Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMorrison-Maierle Inc.MORRISON 41-A MAIERLE, INC. An Employee-Owned Company December 12, 2008 Mayor Kenneth Olson City of Laurel 115 W. First Street P.Q. Box 10 Laurel, MT 59044 Dear Mayor Olson: ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS 315 N. 25th STREET - SUITE 102 - BILLINGS, MT 59101 -406-656-6000 • FAX: 406-237-1201 DEC i g zoos CITY OF LAUREL This letter shall serve as a follow-up to the Wastewater Project Update presented at the December 9th City Council Workshop. The purpose of this letter is to provide a brief summary of Morrison-Maierle's progress to date, cost and rate information on the proposed alternatives, and to request Council direction on these alternatives. Additionally, further City action items are recommended at the end of this letter. One of the first tasks to be completed for this project was a review of the possible discharge permit limits that may be imposed by the Montana DEQ for Laurel's pending MPDES permit. This analysis was completed in August with the probable outcome that the new permit would very likely include an ammonia limit and most likely also include numerical limits for total nitrogen and phosphorous. This analysis indicates that the recommended treatment alternative should be activated sludge rather than addition of BBC's as indicated in the 2006 Facility Plan update. The activated sludge alternative was contemplated in the Facility Plan and 2006 update, but was to be re- evaluated based on likely discharge permit limits as was recently completed. Therefore, MMI recommends modifying the Facility Plan to include the permit limit analysis and implementation of the activated sludge alternative with the upcoming project. This modification will increase the overall cost of the current project by roughly $1.2 million. This additional cost upfront will be much more efficient in the long run, however, meeting future nutrient permit limits at less overall cost. The August 29, 2008 Technical Memorandum documents and summarizes our findings for the discharge permit. City staff have indicated that the City might be interested in proceeding with the disinfection system improvements outlined in the 2006 Facility Plan with the current project. This project would consist of ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection. The Facility Plan recommends this improvement in a subsequent project as the new permit will most likely include a compliance schedule that would allow it to be installed several years from now. Additionally, it would be a good project to submit to TSEP in May of 2010 for up to a 50 percent grant. MMI recommends postponing this project and submitting for additional grant assistance as long as the City has not contemplated supporting a different TSEP grant project. Finally, MMI was requested by Amendment 1 to Task Order 1 to evaluate options for sewer service to the east end of laurel with other lift station alternatives. MMI has completed this evaluation and identified five alternatives ranging in cost from $5.7 M to $9.2 M. These alternatives and the relative costs are summarized in our technical memorandum dated October 3, 2008. Based on conversations with City staff and you, it appears that the City's decision will "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" ;; . ' MORRISON li MAIERLE, INC. probably be to stick with the originally envisioned lift station improvements rather than one of these more expensive alternatives at this time. The City could proceed with one of these alternatives to service the east side of town at a later date and with other financing. Our estimates for the project alternatives are summarized in the attached table. This table includes the original project cost, the original project with the activated sludge option, and the original project with the activated sludge and UV options. Also shown on this table are the estimated rate increases to support each of these options. As you are aware, the City has a 19 percent rate increase scheduled for 2009. This table shows additional equal rate increases for 2010, 2011, and 2012. Alternatively, these rate increases could all be accomplished in one or two years with the total rate increase being the sum of the three years increases shown. Based on this information and additional questions at the December 30th Council Workshop, MMI is requesting direction on three issues as follows: 1. Endorse activated sludge as part of Phase II or continue with the RBC improvements. (MMI strongly recommends implementation of the activated sludge option). Formal action on the final, revised Facility Plan will be required by MDEQ. 2. Addition of UV light disinfection to the Phase II Project or pursue as a separate project after 2010. (MMI recommends postponing this improvement until after 2010 and implement it as a separate project provided the City agrees that this project could be incorporated into a TSEP grant application in May 2010.) 3. Incorporation of the originally envisioned lift station improvements (basically replace or renovate to existing capacities) or incorporate expanded lift station alternatives to better serve the area on the east side of town. (MMI recommends pursuit of additional funding for these improvements and implementation at a later date). Please review these decisions and let us know if you have any questions or need more information. Again, I will be at the December 30th Council Workshop to answer any questions of you, staff, or the Council. Additionally, to satisfy the start-up conditions for the TSEP grant, the City must show that all of the funds are committed for the project. The other funding source will be an SRF loan. Once the above decisions are made by the City Council, MMI recommends moving forward with the SFR.loan commitment agreement. We have a conference call scheduled with representatives of the SRF program, Great West Engineering (your grant administrator), and City staff to discuss the SRF loan requirements and procedures for securing this loan. Once the loan commitment agreement has been executed, the City will have satisfied the TSEP start-up conditions and can secure the grant money. Please call if you have any questions. I look forward to answering any questions of you, the City Council, or staff on the 30th Sincerely, WJA46w4l Carl J. An son, P, E. VP, Billing Office Manager