HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard of Adjustment Minutes 11.14.1995 MINUTES
BOARD OF AD0-gSTMENTS
NOVEMBER 14, 1995 7:00
CITY HALL
P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Andy Muri
John Goodman
Bruce Teeters
Marvin Carter
OTHERS PRESENT:
Cal Cumin
Cheryll Lund
Jim Worthington
Bob Rider
FILE #95-03- DAVID SCHREINER
Fee was paid. Legal ad appeared in the Laurel Outlook two times on
10/25/95 and 11/1/95. No protests received. Received two verbal
statements in favor of the proposed variance. (Nicola Perrigo of
420 Maple and Bob Rider of 103 S. 4th)
Applicant is asking for less than the minimum required lot size of
6,000 square feet to separate two lots going east and west into two
lots with the property line going north and south. Lots will be
5409.6 square feet. Property is zoned residential multi-family.
Legal description of the property is Lots 4 and 5, Block 27 of East
Yellowstone Subdivision.
The reason for asking for this variance is so that the property can
be broken into two separate pieces and then sold.
Question was raised on where the sewer and water lines run.
Jim Worthington states that the two houses have separate water
meters, but he is not sure about where the sewer line runs, and if
it services one or both of the houses.
The sewer and water line issue will be studied and a proposal made
when the plat goes before the Planning Board in the near future.
Motion by Marvin Carter, seconded by Bruce Teeters, that the
application for variance by David Schreiner be approved as written.
Motion carried with all 4 members present voting in favor.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~-L~retary
CITY OF LAUREL
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
LAUREL, MONTANA 59044
WHEREAS, an application for variance was filed with this Board
by C~7~¢~ch~L~ , on the ((~ day of ~~ ,
19~, being designated to be file No. ~[-0~
WHEREAS, after due and legal notice of the application was
given pursuant to law, and a hearing on the same was held before
the Board at its meeting on the ~ ~ day of ~,~!o~ ,
1995; and,
WHEREAS, after full consideration of the same by the Board at
the said meeting, it was moved by ~r~ ~,'~ , seconded by
, to g~a~t~deny the application for variance;
and the said motion wa~.~sed~denzed~, by a vote of ~ in favor
and ~ opposed. (State law requiring the concurrence of at least
4 board members is required to grant any variance)
IT IS ~EREBY ORDERED, that Variance application No.
is hereby:
Granted
Denied
Dated this
day of ~l~]el~t13~f'- , 1995.
Chairman
-.4 ';.*7)
0