HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard of Adjustment Minutes 09.10.1996 MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 7:00
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Andy Muri, Chairman
Bruce Teeters
Johnny Goodman
Bob Western
Marvin Carter
Steve Huschka, 416 7th Avenue
Cheryll Lund, City Secretary
File No. 96-07. Huschka- 416 7th Avenue
Fees paid. Two advertisements put in Laurel Outlook legal section,
as required. No protests received.
Steve Huschka has requested a relief of setbacks in order to add on
to an existing garage that is in violation of the 2 foot sideline
setback.
The north wall of the existing garage is sitting approximately 12-
18 inches off of the property line. He wishes to add the new
garage on and stay within the wall line that is 12-18 inches off of
property line. He also has requested to build the west wall of the
garage right to the alley property line, with the eave extending 12
inches beyond the property line.
The committee after careful consideration and discussion
recommended approval of the variance for the north building line of
the new garage to remain on the same line as the existing garage,
but to deny the garage to extend beyond the 2 foot (from the eaves)
required code.
Motion by Bob Western, seconded by Marvin Carter, to allow the
variance to build a garage along the existing north property line
(12-18" off of property line) but deny the request to build within
the 2 foot (from the eaves) required setback on the west. Motion
carried 5--0. '
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cheryll Lund, Secretary
CITY OF LAUREL
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
LAURE L, MONTAxNA 5 9 0 4 4
WHEREAS, an application for variance was filed with this Board
by Steven Huschka, on the 13th day of July, 1996, being designated
to be file No. 96-07.
WHEREAS, after due and legal notice of the application was
given pursuant to law, and a hearing on the same was held before
the Board at its meeting on the 10th day of September, 1996; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration of the same by the Board at
the said meeting, it was moved by ~1~ t(]J~9~-~ , seconded by
~ ~C~ii~ C~ ~-~i~ tq~gran~t./deny the application for variance;
and the said motion washhOUseS?denied by a vote of .~ in favor
and ~ opposed. (State law requiring the concurrence of at
least 4 board members is required to grant any variance);
that Variance application No. 96-07 is
IT
hereby:
IS HEREBY ORDERED,
Granted
Denied
Dated this 10th day of September, 1996.
~Tairman