Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Workshop Minutes 03.27.2018MINUTES COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1111 4Q1 ' 1KOWIMM- e "01 01 ft, A Council Workshop was held in the Council Chambers and called to order by Mayor Tom Nelson at 6:30 p.m. on March 27, 2018. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: _x Emelie Eaton _ Heidi Sparks _ Bruce McGee x Richard Herr x Scot Stokes x Iry Wilke x Richard Klose x Bill Mountsier OTHERS PRESENT: Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director Carl Jackson, KLJ Forrest Sanderson, KLJ-Interim Planner Public Input Jason Summers, 304 Cedar, expressed his disappointment in the leadership turnout for the Emergency Services Committee meeting. He stated he would continue to pursue the issue. Mayor Nelson assured Mr. Summers that leadership in the Ambulance Department has been brainstorming ideas and is currently looking into the feasibility of these options. All feasible options will be brought to the Emergency Services Committee; please watch for those to be placed on the agenda. General Items There were none. Executive Review • Resolution — YMCA Pool Proposal The YMCA reprehensive was not able to make tonight's meeting. Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director, spoke in regards to the contract. Laurel has used the YMCA's services for approximately 10 years. This contract has gone through Park Board. Park Board requested that August be prorated due to the short month. The YMCA did agree to a prorated August. This will save the City $3,000. The payment schedule will be $16,200 on July 1St, $16,200 on August 1St, and $13,200 on September 1St The YMCA will be offering swimming lessons again this year the fee schedule is listed in Attachments A and B. In the past the YMCA has offered lap swimming by request, they need enough requests to support the required number of lifeguards. Bill questioned if the $3,000 was in addition to the figures listed in the contract. Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Kurt clarified that the $3,000 is already accounted for in the contract with the $13,200 payment due on September 1st, which was originally a payment of $16,200. Iry questioned if the fee schedule per day for the public was included in this proposal. Mayor Nelson clarified that the fee schedule is not part of this resolution. Kurt clarified that the pool's schedule of fees was removed from the City's schedule of fees so the Park Board could discuss and set the fees prior to the pool opening each year. Park Board has discussed changing the fees to family memberships instead of a paying per day. This topic is not before Council. • Resolution —Task Order— East 6th Street Reconstruction Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director, and Carl Jackson, KLJ, presented this Task Order. This Task Order is for the designing and bidding phases of the reconstruction of East 6"' Street from lst Avenue to Wyoming. East 6th Street was chosen for this project because there were no underlying infrastructure that needed to be replaced, such as water and sewer, it had a score of 28 out of 100 for its asphalt condition, and is needed in the future when Montana Avenue, Colorado Avenue, and Pennsylvania Avenue need to be replaced. When these roads are replaced, the heavy equipment will need to not only enter, but exit the street without damaging other streets in the process. East 1st Street is capable of this load, but East 60' Street is not. They may look into creating a Special Improvement District for the sidewalks, gutters, and driveway approaches. KLJ will look into salvaging as much sidewalk as possible. There will be a small portion of water main line and fire hydrant replacement on the corner of East 6th Street and 1st Avenue. The timing of this project will be crucial, as this street is adjacent to Thompson Park. Thompson Park is used for the Fourth of July celebrations each year. East 6th Street is also a major throughway for parents dropping off kids at West and Graff/Middle School. So this project needs to take place after the Fourth of July but be completed before the start of the school year. The area has high groundwater and clay soils, so KLJ will need to design around those two known issues. Richard Klose questioned how many days this project would take. Because there are no underground utilities being replaced this project will not take as long, the contractor should be able to complete the work within the given timeframe. Bill stated when his street was redone all the sidewalks were replaced, he was not given an option to keep his sidewalk. Kurt responded that he was not in charge of that project, but that his goal going forward is only to replace what is needed. There will be areas of good sidewalk that will need to be taken out to accommodate of ADA required ramps. 2 Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Bill questioned if during the replacement of other streets where ADA ramps installed. The City is required to meet all current ADA requirements when designing and building a street. Part of the drainage issue on this street is the water coming from Thompson Park. The good sidewalk may need to be removed to solve the drainage issue. Richard Klose questioned if during the design phase if the City will consider changing the parking to diagonal instead of parallel parking. Citizens have made statements that there needs to be additional parking at Thompson Park. They have looked at how many spots they would gain by creating diagonal parking. The code dictates parking requirements so if the diagonal parking is an option it will need to come before Council for approval. The downside to diagonal parking is if you are parked next to a large vehicle it can be difficult to see when backing up. Being located near both a park and school, this may not be the best option. Mayor Nelson reminded Council that typically a street project is done every two years. They take into consideration not only the asphalt condition but also the condition of the water and sewer lines beneath the street. Because the City is looking to replace the SED Basins this year, the Mayor requested the street selected to be replaced not need any water or sewer improvements. Water and Sewer improvements are taken out of their respective enterprise funds. Kurt stated in the past when creating a Special Improvement District; the City has waited for protest, he would like to try a different approach this year by sending a letter to property owners who have been identified as needing sidewalk or driveway approach replacement. There are also two crosswalks that end in driveway approaches. The City will need to communicate with the school on the locations of these crosswalks. Richard Herr questioned if the proper base would be built for this street. Yes, the street will be built with the proper substructure. The known issues of high water and clay in the soil will need to be incorporated into the design of this street. When the snow melted recently it was thought to be a water main break, in actuality it was just melted snow that had nowhere to go. Drainage of water from the Park is a high priority, KLJ will explore the best options for this water. Richard Herr questioned the concrete work that was done for the bus loading zone at the school and if it will be salvaged. The plan is to save this concrete work and incorporate into the overall street design. That repair was an emergency repair that the School District paid the difference in cost between asphalt and concrete. There is a culvert located there, the buses crush it, and water does not flow very well through it leaving a large puddle for kids to jump over. KLJ will explore the option of a valley drain instead. Iry questioned if all four corners at the intersection of East 6'" Street and Wyoming Avenue would need to be replaced with the ADA required ramps. Yes, all corners will need the required ADA ramps. 3 Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Bill stated that he has watched the past few streets be replaced. They have dug down and established the proper base so that the road will last many years to come. He stated that he was appreciative of the program in place to not only replace the streets but to replace them correctly. When Kurt asked what the number one priority for the City is, KLJ responded that Capital Improvements Plans were the City's top priority. The City is currently using pavement indexing to rank the streets in need. The City will look into implementing a program that looks at the City as a whole, identifies projects that need to be completed, ranks them, and allows for not only Council to discuss what is coming in the future, but to allow an opportunity for citizens to comment on these projects as well. It is not in the best interest of the City to replace a street and not look at the underlying infrastructure. If a water main or sewer line fails, the City will need to tear into the street to address the problem. This will help plan for funding appropriately, both in our enterprise funds and via grants. Mayor Nelson stated that recently they met with Montana Department of Transportation to discuss the City's urban routes, what the City currently has, what routes to create for the future, funding opportunities, etc. There is a TA Grant that the City can apply for, this used to be the CTEP grant. An example of a CTEP project was on East Maryland Lane between Pennsylvania and Iron Horse Station. There were no crosswalks or connectivity of the sidewalks. The City will need to identify a project that they can apply for those funds. Mayor Nelson stated those grants are at an 87 percent/13 percent match rate. The City would be responsible for the 13 percent. Emelie stated that during Public Works Committee there was discussion on what the expectation of KLJ was. They wanted to see more open communication and reduction in costs. The consideration to salvage any sidewalks possible is a great example of cost reductions. Motion — Approve consideration by Staff, an application to annex property constituting less than one half of a City Block: Lots 1-6, Block 7, Nutting Brother Subdivision Forrest Sanderson, KLJ-Interim Planner, introduced himself to Council as this is the first meeting he has not had a prior conflict. Forrest has prepared a staff report regarding this annexation request. He reviewed the highlights of this report, report and supporting documents are attached. The staff s recommendation is to deny this request as it is not in the best interest of the City. Richard Klose noticed the applicant stated on the application that water service is located in the street in front of the property and sewer service is located in the alley of the property. Kurt handed out an aerial view of the property and a diagram of the water and sewer lines near the property, the handout is attached to these minutes. When the City annexes a property, they also annex the adjacent right of ways. 11 Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Richard Herr reiterated that the City prefers the annexation of a full City Block. He asked if the applicant could arrange with the property owner to annex a whole City Block while only building on his half. Yes, the annexation would include the road of Hazel Avenue and the full block of East 8`i' Street, giving the logical extension of roads, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, water, sewer, and all other infrastructure associated with being in the City. Scot questioned if the applicant would be responsible for the infrastructure improvements or if the City would be responsible for those improvements. The policy states that the developer would take on all of the costs associated with the expansion of the infrastructure system. Sidewalks are typically added after a structure has been completed. This allows the contractor access to the lot without destroying a good sidewalk during construction. The City would request a bond of 125 percent of the cost to add the infrastructure that will be held two years. At the end of the two year period, if the developer has not completed all the necessary infrastructure improvements, then the City would go in and complete those improvements. Richard Klose asked about private infrastructure such as natural gas when those would be installed. All private infrastructure is installed concurrently with City infrastructure. Mayor Nelson offered the applicant, Darrell Dyer, a chance to address the Council. Darrel Dyer, the annexation applicant, addressed Council. There are two owners of this property. Mr. Cotter owns the City Block in question, while his ex-wife owns the rest. The road Hazel Avenue separates these owners. If Mr. Dyer annexed the whole block into the City he would be responsible for all the improvements on Hazel Avenue; the ex-wife does not want to participate in the expansion of City services. Therefore, Mr. Dyer's solution to this problem was to annex the half of the block that would not cause any infrastructure improvements on Hazel Avenue, while he and the property owners worked out the details to annex the rest of the property into the City. Emelie gave clarification that motions are given in the affirmative. The motion is to approve consideration by staff The consideration by staff is to deny this request. The vote will be yes or no to accept Forrest's recommendation to the Council. • Motion to allow Council Member Mountsier to be absent from the City of Laurel for more than ten days (LMC 2.12.060) There was no discussion. • Council Discussion o Update on 2011 Yellowstone River flooding event Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director, gave an update on the wetland surveying that was requested this past fall. The weather has finally cooperated, and Great West is out surveying the wetlands to ensure no wetlands were gained or lost during the construction of the new intake. Still working with Wilson Brothers to detennine a good time to remove the rock weir. The river looked like it would be low enough to start the weir removal, but in the few days it took to get the 5 Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 required permits the water levels rose, and it is no longer safe to remove the weir. When the water levels fall to a safe level to remove the weir, the contractor will begin work. Over the winter the new intake was only using one line. With the ice off the river they shut down the 2003 intake, there was a noticeable drop in flow from the new intake. The sensors for the flow rate are located above the reservoir where both intakes feed into. There is no way to tell what percentage of water was coming from the new intake and what was coming from the old intake. With the increase in water level, there was also an increase in turbidities in the river. From the surface you can see approximately 3 inches into the water, the intake is located 4 feet under water. Staff cannot visualize the intake until the water level lowers. Great West is looking into the feasibility of using cameras to look at the intake and make sure there is no obstruction. The 2003 intake is back online in conjunction with the new intake. There was no slush ice coming into the plant this year as the pipeline is 3 miles long and the heat from the ground warmed the water up, so there was no slush. Emelie questioned if they knew if the new intake had ever run at 100 percent capacity. Kurt responded he was unsure. Out of all the alternatives, this was the best option for the City. Mayor Nelson assured Council that they would find what the issues are and resolve it. o Update from staff on electrical work needed in Horseshoe Club building Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director, stated Park Board recommended a lease for the Horseshoe Club building in Riverside Park. Upon further inspection by staff, some electrical concerns were noted. Ace Electric came in and gave an estimate to bring all electrical issues up to code. The question now is who will pay for these repairs. Some are located in the building and some outside the building. Mayor Nelson stated that the City does not own the building and therefore should not be responsible for the cost to bring the building to code. Scot questioned what the cost would be to fix just the outside issues. Kurt did not know the cost of just the outside work but would ask the contractor to split the bid and return to the next Workshop. Mayor Nelson stated in other leases in Riverside Park it has stated that minor repairs outside of the building would be taken care of by the City. This is a Council decision and will be brought forward via resolution. Iry questioned if the Horseshoe Club does not see power outside the building can the outlet and light just be removed. Mayor Nelson suggested the review of the Riverside Park Master Plan and see if the light was included in those plans, prior to making a decision. Other Items Mayor Nelson stated every year he would attend the Elected Officials Boot Camp and Workshop sessions. This year these are located in Billings. All information will be sent out to Council Members, if anyone is interested in attending, please contact the Administrative Assistant. rol Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Review of Draft Council Agenda for April 3, 2018 Mayor Nelson stated that the agenda item "Mayor Update" has been added to the agenda after Council Discussion. This is a regimented place for the Mayor to give updates on topics as needed. This was at the City Attorney's recommendation. Attendance at the April 3, 2018, Council Meeting All in attendance plan to attend next week Council Meeting. Announcements Mayor Nelson announced all vacancies the City is still in need of filling for the various Boards and Commissions. There was a recent resignation from the Emergency Services Committee. The Mayor has received one letter of interest for this position. Other openings are Public Works Committee, City/County Planning Board, and Yellowstone Historical Preservation Board. Mayor Nelson gave an update on who is remaining for City ID's. There is only one Council Member still in need of getting an ID at this time. Richard Herr questioned if Public Works knew of a few large potholes by the Lutheran Church and Catholic Church. Kurt Markegard, Public Works Director, stated they are aware of the issue on W. 2nd Street. This will need to be dug and repaired. The asphalt plants are not operating now; the City is doing what they can right now until those plants open in April. Scot asked for an update on the sidewalk program. Scot asked for the City to look at the viability of the Sheriff s community service program. Mayor Nelson stated that the Council had discussed this program last year and ran into obstacles on who would staff and supervise the work being completed. Emelie gave a reminder of the next Public Works Committee meeting on April 16th at 6 p. in. in Council Chambers. Emelie clarified that the start time for Budget/Finance should be 5:00 p.m., not 5:30 p.m. Emelie asked for an update on when the no parking sign will be placed at the High School. Kurt stated the sign is in his office, and he will get someone out there to place the sign. The curb was painted last fall. Richard Klose announced on March 291h at noon at the National Cemetery the American Legion is doing a Welcome Home Vietnam Vets Ceremony. On April 4th at 11 a.m. the American Legion is doing an Unattended Ceremony for veterans who were not buried with military honors. Bill questioned why a veteran would be buried without military honors. N Council Workshop Minutes of March 27, 2018 Richard Klose stated that sometimes families are unaware of or the person may have been homeless. Each quarter they make sure these people are buried with honors. The council workshop adjourned at 8:19 p.m. Respe lly submit d, Br e Moon Administrative Assistant NOTE: This meeting is open to the public. This meeting is for information and discussion of the Council for the listed workshop agenda items. To The City Of Laurel, I am requesting that six lots which are described by a legal description as follows: Nutting Brothers Subdivision, S10 To2 R24 E Blk 7 Lot 1-6. The current plat map as it now sits recorded does not need to be changed. The only improvements required is the addition of a sidewalk along Juniper and Roosevelt ie 8th street that joins against the property line. The current use is Vacant land. Under the zoning that Noel Eaton had designated the minimum square footage per lot was 6000 and the current lots at at 50x140 or 7000. So my intention of bringing the lots into the city without any changes should fit nicely. I have also submitted the letter from the current owner Jim Cotter to allow for the approval process. Once this has been approved my intent is to close on the land, clean it up, and build 6 individual homes. I paid 1,450 in fees on 12/22. So hopefully this process can be expedited. Best Darrell Dyer 701-527-2100 CITY HALL 115 W. 1sT ST. PUB. WORKS: 628-4796 WATER OFC.: 628-7431 COURT: 628-1964 FAX 628-2241 Office of Planning Date: March 22, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council P.O. Box 10 Laurel, Montana 59044 From: Forrest Sanderson, AICP, CFM — Contract Planner Re: Annexation Request, Darrell Dyer Office of the Director of Public Works On December 22, 2017, an annexation request for Lots 1 — 6, Block 7, Nutting Brothers Subdivision was submitted to Noel Eaton with the City of Laurel. A portion of this request was an initial zoning assignment of Residential Limited Multi -Family (RLMF) and a conceptual Multi - Family development plan. The request to annex half a block was not presented to the City Council for consideration as required by City Council Resolution R08-22 and the City approved Request for Annexation and Plan of Annexation Application form. The property owner is James M. Cotter and the petitioner is Darrell Dyer. The application materials contain an approval letter from the owner that has not been notarized, a series of potential site development plans, application fees, a street view picture of the property in question, tax and property information. These documents are hereby attached to and made part of this report by reference. The Planner, accepted the application and began processing the request including scheduling the matter for public hearing by the City -County Planning Board and sending certified notices to surrounding property owners. The petitioner/owner did not submit all of the additional information in time for the February 1, 2018, City -County Planning Board meeting and the hearing was canceled. In the interim the City Planner has resigned her position with the City with the matter pending. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST City Council Resolution #R08-22 (March 4, 2008) and the aforementioned Application Form establishes the criteria and requirements for the annexation of property. Given that we are dealing with %2 of a Block the analysis will be limited to only those items of initial relevance. Dyer Annexation Standard: 1. Only parcels of land adjacent to the City of Laurel will be considered for annexation. If the parcel to be annexed is smaller that one city block in size (2.06 acres), the city council must approve consideration of the request; the applicant must make a separate written request to the city council stating their wish to annex a parcel of land less than onecity block in size. Once the council approves the request, the applicant can apply for annexation. Findings: A. The property requested for consideration is adjacent to the existing Laurel city limits; B. The property requested for consideration is t/2 block in size (E%2 Block 7); C. The property owner (James Cotter) owns all of Block 7 and the E``/2 of Block 6; D. All of the James Cotter ownership is adjacent to the current Laurel city limits; E. Piecemeal annexation and is not in the best interest of the City of Laurel and appears to be inconsistent with your 2013 Growth Policy. (Infrastructure, Land Use, and Transportation Sections). These sections encourage comprehensive `big picture' looks at development, growth and the extension of public infrastructure. MOVING FORWARD The application does not adequately address the following items as required by Council Policy: a. An extension of City Streets, Water, Sewer, Sidewalks, Storm Water, Curb and Gutter and how the developer/owner intends to pay for these infrastructure extensions; b. An executed waiver of the right to protest the creation of SID's; c. Adequate discussion of the suitability of the proposed zoning for the property to be annexed; d. A notarized signature from the record property owner authorizing the annexation and requested initial zoning; e. Adequate discussion of the subdivision process to create lots that conform to the minimum district requirements and use limitations imposed by the Laurel Zoning Regulations. 2. The application did include a fee for the consideration of annexation and zoning. a. The fee is adequate for the application as presented but depending upon the decision of the Council to proceed may not be adequate if a larger area is required to be annexed. b. Should the request to proceed with %2 Block annexation be disapproved by the Council, the fees should be returned, and the applicant required to start over with a new annexation request. 4 Dyer Annexation RECOMMENDATION: The request to proceed with annexation of Lots 1— 6, Block 7, Nutting Brothers Subdivision should be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. The property owner (James Cotter) owns at least one full City Block and the request for annexation can easily be amended to comply with the City's desire to conduct annexation, zoning, and extension of public infrastructure on a comprehensive basis. 2. The requested annexation is not consistent with the 2013 Laurel Growth Policy. 3. Authorize the return the Application Fees paid by the applicant. Dyer Annexation CITY OF LAURE L9 MONTANA Rti,,QUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND PLAN OF ANNEXATION All blanks of this avvUestionare to be filled in with 2 a ation I not be acgpted, Only parcels of land adjacent to the City of Laurel municipal limits will be considered for annexation. "Adjacent to" also includes being across a public right of way. If the parcel to be annexed is smaller than one city block in size (2.06 acres), the city council must approve consideration of the request; the applicant must make a separate written request to the city council stating their wish to annex a parcel of land less than one city block in. Once the council approves the request, the applicant can apply for annexation. 2. Applicant landowner's name: Address:— 13 . 9 G- 10) L Phone: —t -k a 1-0 9 —5 3. Parcel to be annexed: (if it is not surveyed or of public record, it must be of public record PRIOR to applying for annexation.) Legal description: _9AAM,,jv - Lot size: 0 q (OL4 Present use: V C-IN. L)-, _L=pA4C-) Planned use: H to. no 0 S -i VLA At-s Present �-UUIL16. I (Land which is being annexed automatically beconnes zoned R-7500 when it is officially annexed [City ordinance 17.12.220]) 4. City services: The extension of needed city services shall be at the cost of the applicant after annexation by the city has been approved. As part of the application process, each of the following city services must be addressed with an explanation: Water Service: Location of existing main:— 3 Jv -, � , e--0, Cost of extension of approved service: How cost determined: Timeframe for installation: Sewer Service: Location of existing main: M" r, Cost of extension of approved service: How cost determined: Timeframe for How Streets: Is there any adjoining County ROW to the proposed Location of existing paved access Cost of Flow cost determined: Timeframe for construction: Other required improvements: Provide above information on attached pages, 5. A map suitable for review of this application of the proposed area to be annexed must be submitted with this application. 6. A written Waive of Protest must accompany this application, suitable for recording and containing a covenant to run with the land to be annexed, waiving all right of protest to the creation by the city of any needed improvement district for construction or maintenance of municipal services. This Waiver of Protest must be signed by the applicant prior to annexation by the city. 7. Requests for annexations are referred to. the City -County Planning Board for recommendation to the City Council. Within 30 days after receiving the properly filled out application with all required accompaniments and after conducting a duly advertised public hearing, the City -County Planning Board shall make recommendation to the City Council as to this Request for Annexation. If more information is needed from the applicant during the review of the application, such application shall be deemed incomplete and the timeframe for reporting to the City Council extended accordingly, in needed. 8. A non-refundable application fee of $300 + $25.00 per acre (80 acres or less); $300 + $35.00 per acres (81 acres or more) must accompany the submission of this application. The City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, after review and consideration of this Application for Annexation, found such to be in the best interest of the City, that it complied with state code, and approved this request at its City Council meeting of Form revised by City Attorney April 2008 N TO: City of Laurel 1/25/2018 I Jim Cotter sole owner of the property identified as geocode 03-0821-10-2-07-07-0000 Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Legal Description: NUTTING BROS SUBD, 510, T02 S, R24 E, BLOCK 7, Lot 1 - 6,agree to allow Darrell Dyer who has the property under a current buy sale agreement to proceed with bringing the property from county jurisdictions to the City Limits under a design of his choosing. My agreement is that Mr. Dyer will work directly with the city and will have purchased the property before the final process is complete. Regards Jim Cotted 1 AFFIDAVIT OF WAIVER OF PROTEST BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE!, CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA VOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE HEREINDESCRIBED PROPERTY AND CREATION OF ANY FUTURE, SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT The undersigned hereby waives protest to the annexation of the property described belo", by the City ofLaurel. Undersigned also waives their right to seek judicial review under M.C.A. § 7-2-4741 (2007), subsequent to the City's annexation of the below described property, The undersigned hereby additionally waives protest to the creation of future Special Improvement District(s) created and/or formed for future street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage or any other lawful purpose, This Affidavit is submitted pursuant to and as a part of the Annexation Agreement and future contemplated Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City of Laurel. This Affidavit of Waiver shall run with the land and shall forever be binding upon the Grantee, their transferees, successors and assigns. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY: "I DATED thus -_ day of w, 20 Grantee Name (Company..) STATE OF )ss. County of On this - day of 20_, personally appeared before me, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged the lie/she/they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Sea[ on the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for the State of (SEAL) Residing at: My Commission Expires:_____ 11 Cl L �1 L L L 1C - r— fD (Cl CD :s CL r CITY OF LAUREL PO BOX 10 LAUREL, MT. 59044 This is an application to the Laurel -Yellowstone City -County Planning Board, which acts as the City Zoning Commission, for an amendment/variance to the Official zoning Map or Ordinance. Such applications to re -zone are considered first by the Zoning Commission whose recommendations are then transmitted to the City Council for final action. 1. All questions must be answered fully. Please type or print. You may attach further pages if additional space is needed. Applications not filled out properly will not be accepted! 2. If new construction or a change in use of property is contemplated, building or development plans are helpful in the review process of this application. Photographs are often helpful. . 3. If there are covenants or deed restrictions on the property, submit a copy of them and indicate their expiration date. 4. All plans and other exhibits submitted with this application will be retained as part of the permanent public record. 5. The applicant will prepare a 300 -foot radius map drawn to scale adequately and legibly enough to show the subject property and adjacent property within the 300 feet (of the exterior of the boundary of the property to be considered for re -zoning). MAPS NEED TO BE TURNED BACK IN WITH THE APPLICATION. 6. AF tplicant is required to take the map to the Department of Revenue located in Billings at 175 N. 27 Street, Suite 1400 (14`h floor of the Wells Fargo Building) -896-4000), where they will process it for names, street address, mailing address, legal description and owners of record of all property located within the 300 -foot radius map. They will certify the information and contact you when it is done (this can take up to a full week). There is a charge for certification. 7. To cover the cost of the application review, newspaper advertisements, and mailings, a fee of $1,100.00 (+ $25.00 per acre) must accompany the application. APPLICATION MUST BE MADE ON OR BEFORE THE FIRST DAY OF THE MONTH TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE NEXT MONTH'S MEETING. (1sT Thursday of each month at 7:00 pm) 8. A public hearing must be held on all applications. The City will notify all persons identified as owners of the property within the 300 -foot radius by mail not less than 10 days prior to the date of the Public Hearing before the Planning Board. In addition, notification of the public hearing will be published in the legal section of the local newspaper 15 days prior to the hearing. 9. After the Planning Board makes their recommendation to the city council, the council will set a time for a 2"d public hearing, and a workshop to discuss the Planning Board's recommendation. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE COUNCIL SECRETARY TO FIND OUT THE TIMES OF THOSE MEETINGS, AT 628-7431 EX. 6. 10. Once the City Council has granted or denied the zone change an ordinance must be drawn up by the City Attorney and go before the council for approval. 11. The complete process could take up to 120 days. PETITIONER MUST BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING Revised 2-13-09 PETITIONER MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARINGS. The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described property requests a Zone Change/Land Use Variance as outlined in the City Zoning Ordinance: From: „ elvo-�, i r cac k .s Zone one 1. Legal Description of property: ;» 2. General location: ,j "vg', ?-e-v- j, x-vo 3. Proposed use: Q\ XA t k V i- G. v L l 4. Owner(s): ) (k c, t;0- Y � (Recorded owner) 5. Agent(s): (address) . 5%- (,Lg("2 (phone number) (address) (phone number) 9. Covenants or deed restrictions on property: Yes No x I understand that the fling fee accompanying this application is not refundable, that it pays the cost of processing, and that the fee does not constitute a payment for a Zone Change/ Land Use Variance. Also, that all the information presented is true and correct. Petitioner's Signature -d -- Date %J2 - 1-D /,? d G Fee Paid & Date Paii Q 7. -6 _�� 1 j / -�, City of Laurel, 115 W. First Street, Laurel, Montana 59044 L b1.t.}, St - !'�- T T --- i I 1 1 1 2&cr 710 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 UNITS Jet 2-BDwt i 1 2 -BATH 20 LEVEL 1 740 1 i 2 1 I (� i t A7H 1Sff tall iS0' iS 1 1 I � 1sr IEtE7. 1 iC ACE RACE 1 I I 1S12Y 7mr2Y 7512Y 1512Y .-2- ---- 1 ----.� Tao• i).m � ��-�� � 1 �9�_a I J I 1 now 1 1 1 2-DATH j TAD LEVEL toff r+ji • 1 T UNITS C; 1 n o i 1 uw 1 I 1S0' ta0 1S0'"rt 1 5 1ST 1 1 ',7 1 7 5faD1' 15'rTY 15r1Y 15',1715 15'd IT i 2 uR7Ts � H2DDtE 47. [ 1 J 1 10.0' i '.J 1 �..• 2-BA7" [ tsr aw, LSD' 1S0' iSm 714' 1 1ACE 1 AOE RAGE' 1 r.2Y 1 I 1SriY 1tS.2Y tY.22' 1 1 1 2 WRIM II L 2-80RU 1 1 1 1 2-DATH T/7J LENTIL •,� tar _ ( 11 }� 1 7 ul" t).m tam lSff I&W 7S0• ".W 1 LIST LEVEL M RAGE War 75S2Y War 15•.22' i - - - - - - - - - - - - - -J_J FIR - ---- ----------- -T--8 4 K �1 2E 7' N co 00 4 co --------- LOCUST A 6AG 8 285 To JJJ Yellowstone County Property Tax Information Yel�lc�u��stn"74-1111F., �nn,t►a a : Not all fields are currently maintained. The accuracy of the data is not ed. Please notify the Appraisal/Assessment Office of any inaccuracies. Back to Search 101.111 I'tali Orion Detail Owner Information Page 1 of 2 " 'lease Note: Owner information is supplied by the Montana Department of Revenue. To request updates to addresses or other ownership information, please contact the DOR office at 896-4000. Records for the current year will not be updated after tax bills have been sent out, so changes requested after you receive your bill will appear only on next year's records. Tax ID: B01681D Primary Party Primary Owner Name: COTTER, JAMES M AKA - Also Known As COTTER, JAMES 2018 Mailing Address: COTTER, JAMES M Assessed Value Detail Tax Year: 2017 Class Code Amount 2101 - Tract Land = $ 52,864.00 Total = $ 52,864.00 values shown for the given tax year are for taxation purposes only. They are supplied by the partment of Revenue. For questions about these values, please contact the Montana Department of venue, Appraisal/Assessment Office at 406-896-4000. Rural SID Payoff Information NONE Property Tax Billing History http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/gis/csaprop.asp?propid=229421 3/2/2018 1309 E 8TH ST LAUREL, MT 59044-2211 Property Address: JUNIPER AVE Township: 02 S Range: 24 E Section: 10 Subdivision: NUTTING BROS SUBD Block: 7 Lot: 1 Full Legal: NUTTING BROS SUBD, S10, T02 S, R24 E, BLOCK 7, Lot 1 - 6 GeoCode: 03-0821-10-2-07-07-0000 Show on Map (May not workfor some newer properties.) Property Assessment Information Levy District: Assessed Value Summary Assessed Land Value = $ 52,864.00 Assessed Building(s) Value = $ 0.00 Total Assessed Value = $ 52,864.00 Assessed Value Detail Tax Year: 2017 Class Code Amount 2101 - Tract Land = $ 52,864.00 Total = $ 52,864.00 values shown for the given tax year are for taxation purposes only. They are supplied by the partment of Revenue. For questions about these values, please contact the Montana Department of venue, Appraisal/Assessment Office at 406-896-4000. Rural SID Payoff Information NONE Property Tax Billing History http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/gis/csaprop.asp?propid=229421 3/2/2018 Yellowstone County Property Tax Information Year 1st Half 2nd Half Total 2000 61.75 P 64.06 P 125.81 2001 61.80 P 61.80 P 123.60 2002 63.22 P 63.22 P 126.44 2003 29.02 P 29.02 P 58.04 2004 29.06 P 29.04 P 58.10 2005 30.12 P 30.11 P 60.23 2006 29.57 P 29.56 P 59.13 2007 28.09 P 28.08 P 56.17 2008 26.11 P 26.10 P 52.21 2009 29.70 P 29.69 P 59.39 2010 28.20 P 28.17 P 56.37 2011 29.12 P 29.09 P 58.21 2012 31.15 P 31.13 P 62.28 2013 31.26 P 31.24 P 62.50 2014 31.18 P 31.17 P 62.35 2015 145.80 P 145.78 P 291.58 2016 148.21 P 148.18 P 296.39 2017 185.40 P 185.39 370.79 (P) indicates paid taxes. Click on year for detail. Pay Taxes Online Jurisdictional Information Commissioner Dist: 1 - John Ostlund (R) School Attendance Areas Senate: 28 - Tom Richmond (R) High: LAUREL House: 55 - Vince Ricci (R) Middle: LAUREL Ward: Outside City Limits Elem: LAUREL Precinct: 55.4 Zoning: Residential Tracts Click Flere to view Billines Reeulations Click Here to view Laurel School District Trustee Links Reeulations Click Frere to view Broadview Reeulations comments or questions regarding the web site may be directed to the Page 2 of 2 http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/gis/csaprop.asp?propid=229421 3/2/2018 44 . ti iN 14 f to � ;� I � �4•, � Y ' I I � Cill i --- 1L8ZZ co � 8 i s i -7AV 77ZVH im I LI i LL c 0 a� cr c L a� Q 0 L- CL Q 0 41 c U f6 f6 H a- m L L ai cli V) c a) m 05