HomeMy WebLinkAboutMT Urban & Community ForestryDear Montana Mayor,
Montana's Urban and Community Forestry (UCF) Program needs your support! Many of your communities have benefited
fiom program activities such as Tree City USA, Arbor Day grants, planting project grants and the technical assistance
offered by Department of Natural Resources and Conservatiun's (DNRC) Urban Foresters.
As explained during our presentations at past meetings of the Montana League of Cities and Towns, the funding for UCF
programs nationwide is in question. Montana's UCF program is exclusively funded through a federal grant to the State of
Montana fiom The U.S. Forest Service. The amount of the grant has been reduced over the past few years as described in
the attached fact sheet. The proposed federal 2008 budget includes an additional 40% reduction in funding for the program.
If approved, this reduction will require a significant reduction in services provided by DNRC and may result in the
elimination of the Mont~n~UCF progrem~
To help stabilize funding for this program, DNRC has two proposals regarding urban forestry before the 2007 legislarare.
If these proposals are funded, we could maintain the program while the federal funding picture is clarified.
The first proposal is for a $100,000 grant fiom the Renewable Resources Program within House Bill 6, which would
provide funding for grants to Montana communities to improve management of their urban and neighborhood forest
landscapes. Currently, HB 6 has sufficient funds for the first 51 projects. Our proposal ranked 59th, so is not projected to
receive the requested funds.
The second proposal was for $200,000 over the biennium to replace anticipated federal funding reductions, and ensure
stability for DNRC urban forestry staff. The proposed funding source was the Resource Indemnity Trust fund, which is
enabled through HB116.
Neither proposal has been approved during budget hearings within the Montana House of Representatives. There
remains a possibility that the Senate could restore some of these funds during budget hearings before the Senate
Finance and Claims Committee.
If you feel the Urban Forestry Program is valuable to your community, please contact a member of the Senate
Finance and Claims Committee and/or your state Senator to express support for these two proposals. You should
specifically refer to the following:
· $200,000 for the DNRC Urban Forestry Program within HBII6.
I have included some general information outlining Urban ForesUy Program talking points, benefits, accomplishments and
cunc~rus for your consideration. If you have any questions or wish information specific to your community's participation
in the program please do not hesitate to contact me at 406-582-3204 cobtreesC~lvahoo.com.
Thank you for your support of Montana's Urban and Community Forestry Program.
Sincerely,
Montana Urban and Community Foresl~y Association
POINTS FOR URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY
MISSION: Assist communities with creating, developing, and maintaining local urban forestry
programs.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2001-2006
· Percent of Population: 57% (528,607) of Montana's population (935,670) lives in cities, towns, and
other US Census designated l!laees CDP's).(129 cities & towns and 56 CDP's)
· 37 Tree City USA's; representing 418,664 citizens (45%) of Montana. Of the total population living in
cities and towns (514,550), eighty-one percent (81%) live in TCUSA's.
· Grants: 93 different communities have received 405 grants equaling $207,000.
· Grant leverage: $490,000 in matching local project dollars, 20,416 volunteer hours.
· Trees Planted: Approximately 600 large caliper
· Education: Classes, Poster contest (3th place national winner), arborist training and certification
· Technical Assistance: Provided at no charge to assist community employee tree care providers
PROGRAM BENEFITS
· UCF promotes the economic development, long term community development and quality of life
for ali Montana communities, its citizens and non-citizens alike.
· Healthier More Productive Community Forests
· Available Services: provides, for free, services maybe not be available through private sector.
· Tree Payback Average 40 year old urban tree in Montana
o $840 in energy conserved, storm water, cleaner air & water, higher property values, protection
from rain- sun-wind, improved business, lower urban temperatures, noise and visual buffers,
increased sense of community
o added 10%-15% toproperty values.
o shaved 20% off your cooling costs.
o 100, 40 year old trees cleaned 53 tons of Carbon Dioxide from the air, filtered out 430 lbs or
air borne pollutants, has provided $84,000 in net benefits.
PROGRAM POTENTIAL
· Continue accomplishments; education, grants, more eeffified arborists, assistance to communities
· Link to Biomass and Fuels Reduction
· Insect and Disease support
· Existing urban forest management and maintenance
MONTANA URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY OVERVIEW
Mission: Assist communities with creating, developing, and maintaining local urban forestry programs.
Staff: One full-time state coordinator (Missoula); one full-time urban forester (Poison), and one half-
time urban forester (Billings).
· Services available to all incorporated and unincorporated cities and towns.
· Examples of services provided:
Information and Education to Communities, Volunteers and Tree Care Professionals: School
programs, Arbor Day celebrations, workshops (pruning, planting, inventory) and arborist
certification exams.
Technical Assistance: Management planning, inventory, hazardous tree assessment, insect and
disease, planting, pruning, project planning and rne.intenaane.
Financial Assistance: Since 2001 over $200,000 in grants to communities (communities have
spent an additional $450,000) including Arbor Day, Tree City USA, and other special project grants
(example: Fort Benton).
Volunteer Coordination: Average 5,000 volunteer days per year.
Tree City USA: Currently 36 Tree City USA communities participating.
Partnerships: Association of Montana Turf& Ornamental Professionals (AMTOP), Montana
League of Cities and Towns, Conservation Districts, RC&D's, NRCS, and others.
Montana Urban and Community Forestry Association (MUCFA): Volunteer advisory board providing
recommendations to the State Forester on program management and development.
We believe this is an important program to Montana communities. This program promotes the
economic development and quality of life for Montana communities and citizens. The UCF Program
provides, for free, services that are not consistently available through the private sector, especially in
Cantml and Eastern Montana.
Funding Situation
· This program is currently 100% funded through the USFS State and Private Forestry Program.
· Federal funding reductions from $226,000 in State FY 2004, $221,000 in FY05, $216,000 in FY06 to
$165,000 for FY07.
· National funding trend has been away from the West and rural states. Funding distribution is largely by
formula. Formula changes to more population-based criteria in the last two years have distinctly
favored non-rural regions and states with large urban centers. It took a very concentrated effort in 2005
by the Western State Foresters to maintain enough funding in the West to keep the programs functional.
· Federal 2008 Presidents budget proposes 40% reduction is national Urban Forestry budget.
· Our current budget of $165,000 funds 2.5 FTE ($153,000) leaving about $12,000 for operations and
grants.
The program cannot sustain its current service at this level. Mirdmai operations; vehicles and supplies
for the three positions are over $12,000.
· DNRC is pursuing multiple alternative funding options: Executive Budget Proposal in Governor's
office requesting $100,000 per year of 2008/2009 biennium Resource Indemnity Trust funding. RIT
fl.ulding would maintain and expand our grants to communities program and support minimal operations
expenditures not covered through the federal grant. Federal funding would be utilized to fund FTE and
the majority of our program operations cost. The Urban Forestry Program has also applied for a
$100,000 Ranewable Resource Grant. The CJrant Application did not make the top proposal list that
would be presented to the Legislature.
· RIT funding is appropriate as the Urban and Community Forestry program can benefit the economy of
the state and the lives of Montana citizens. 15-38-102(2) and 15-38-103(4) MCA.
Sen. Tmdi Schmidt
Sen. Keith Bales
Sen. Gregory Barlms
Sen. John Bmeggeman
Sen. John Cobb
Sen. Mike Cooney
Sen Steve Gallus
Sen. Ken Hansen
Sen. Bob Hawks
Sen. Rick Liable
Sen. Lane Larson
Sen. Dave Lewis
Sen. Grog Lind
Sen. Corey Stapleton
Sen. Bill Tash
Sen. Mirth Tropila
Sen. Dave Wanzended
Sen Dan Weinberg
Sen Carol Williams
SENATE FINANCE AND CLAIMS COMMITTEE
2007 LEGISLATURE
Char
SD11 Great Falls
SD20 Otter
SD4 Shelby
SD6 Poison
SD9 Augusta
SD40 Helena
SD37 Butte
SD17 Harlem
SD33 Bozemen
SD44 Darby
SD22 Billings
SD42 Helena
SD50 Missoula
SD27 Billings
SD36 Dillon
SD 12 Groat Falls
SD49 Misoula
SD 2 Whitefish
SD46 Missoula