HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity/County Planning Board Minutes 01.06.2000 a
Minutes
City-County Planning Board
January 6, 2000, 7.00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Members Present: John H. Smith, Chairman
Gerald Shay, Member-at-Large
Tom Robertus, County Rep.
Clarence Foos, County Rep.
Laurel Haggart, City Rep.
Kate Stevenson, City Rep.
Betty Hart, County Rep.
Others Present: Cal Cumin, City Planner
Cheryll Lund, City Secretary
Motion by Gerald Shay, second by Betty Hart, to approve the minutes of the December 2,
1999 meeting, with several corrections on spelling of names of people that spoke at the Public
Hearing. Motion carried.
Chairman Smith closed the Planning Board meeting temporarily and opened the Zoning
Commission.
Kukes Zone Change Request
Cal passed out his recommendation for the zone change request for Rossmoor Subdivision, Lot 3
Block 1, and read the recommendation into the record. (See attached) The written report
explained both the requested zone change and the process of land development.
Motion by Clarence Foos, second by Tom Robertus, to vote by ballot. Motion carried, 5-0 with
Laurel Haggart not voting.
Motion by Laurel Haggart, second by Betty Hart, to deny the application for zone change.
Discussion.
The question was raised as to who would pay for the additional costs that this zone change could
generate, such as extending water and sewer lines, and possible street widening?
Cal stated such issues are covered in the subdivision process, but that the cost of the extension of
services usually falls on the developer.
Betty Hart wondered how many places are available in the City for manufactured homes?
1
• There are manufactured home zones in Laurel with spaces available.
At this time the motion to approve the zone change was voted on. Motion was defeated by a
vote of 3-4.
Motion by Betty Hart, second by Kate Stevenson,to approve the zone change application.
At this time the motion was voted on and carried 4-3.
PUBLIC HEARING SPECIAL REVIEW-ENTERTAINMENT SUBDIVISION
Proponents:
An application to allow a wood truss and wall panel manufacturing plant, including outside
storage of raw materials and finished product,has been requested for Lot 2, Block 1,
Entertainment Park Subdivision which is located on East Railroad Street next to Big Sky
Nursery.
The application is to allow a 12,000 square foot metal building on 5 of the 10 acres. The agent
for the owners said the business would provide approximately 40 jobs for Laurel.
They have not decided which 5 acres they will place the business on, but it would be located
towards the front of the property on E. Railroad. They will pave the parking lot and keep the rest
of the lot in gravel and landscaping. Their outside storage will be facing the highway and will be
both lumber and trusses.
The irrigation ditch will be covered as was the condition placed on this subdivision when it came
into the city limits.
Discussion.
Opponents:
No one was present to speak against the proposed application.
Question on landscaping requirements. Cal recommends landscaping both on E. Railroad Street
and on the highway side.
Gerald Shay suggests a fast growing tree be planted, such as a seedless cottonwood.
A suggestion was made to make 20% of the tree requirement be evergreens that stay green all
year around.
Suggestion of putting up a fence to hide some of the storage of the products.
2
A question on whether or not they will store their forklifts and vehicles on the outside of the
building, or inside.
Cal states that the board can suggest to the City Council special requirements on this application
that they see fit.
Cal recommends approval of the special review subject to the requirements of trees, landscaping
both on E. Railroad Street and along 1-90, and that the owners provide a written schedule of
maintenance for their landscaping, trees and weeds.
The developer questioned putting large trees on the property, as it would be expensive to do so.
He suggested they look at what the City of Billings requires for landscaping.
Question on how this will affect the other 5 acres, as far as what kind of business can be placed
on the lot if this is granted.
Cal states that the business on the second 5 acres will have to conform to a Highway Commercial
zoning, which is compatible with what kind of businesses are in the area now.
Motion by Laurel Haggart, second by Betty Hart,to recommend approval of the Special Review
for Lot 2, Block 1, Entertainment Subdivision, subject to the requirement oft inch seedless
cottonwood trees every 50 feet along Railroad and the interstate and that 20 percent of the total
number of trees be evergreen;the owner provide an enforceable contract agreement for the
installation and continued maintenance of the landscaping and the control of weeds on non-
improved parts of the two lots; and, that he comply with off-street parking, paving, and other
similar requirements of the Public Works Director. Motion carried 6-0.
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT—MOUNTAIN MUDD
They are attempting to relocate their Mountain Mudd but from the Town Pump location to a
location across the street at the Cono-Mart in the northeast corner of the lot. The lot will be
paved around the Mountain Mudd building and using the existing entrances.
Question on the fence that is located next to the ditch. It appears to be placed for safety issues.
Will it remain?
Yes, it will remain if it is intact now.
Question on alternate route that is showing on the plan. Will it be used?
The existing entrance off of the highway will be used for entering and exiting with the exit and
entrance on S.E. 01 being an alternate route for customers.
Cal recommends approval of this application subject to paving of the lot as required; and the
$1500 cashier's check or money order being given to the city prior to council approval.
Motion by Gerald Shay, second by Clarence Foos, to recommend approval of the temporary use
permit subject to Cal's 2 conditions. Motion carried. 6-0.
The Zoning Commission was closed and the Planning Board meeting re-opened.
ANNEXATION REQUEST—W. 12" STREET
The annexation request is for Lot 2A, Block 15 of Laurmac Subdivision. This is smaller than the
minimum annexation allowed and has gone through the City Council for approval for such
submittal. The site has city water and city sewer. It is right in the middle of the city limit line
and is more of a bookkeeping issue for the city.
Motion by Gerald Shay, second by Tom Robertus to recommend approval of annexation.
Motion carried 6-0.
Home Occupation Ordinance Review
Cal passed out a letter from John Oakes regarding his concern with the home occupations and
with suggestions regarding the same.
Mr. Oakes spoke regarding his concerns.
His main concern is the disruption that some home occupations create in residential areas. He
would like to see the city find a way to issue home occupations in a consistent, orderly manner,
with follow-up done on the applications that are approved.
Cal feels that the issue is enforcement of the Home Occupations. He wants the Board to think
about ways that this could be done.
Question on the ability to renew home occupations? Could their business licenses be contingent
on the compliance of their home occupations?
Councilman Bud Johnson spoke to the board regarding what the council would like to see done
with home occupations. At this time there is no review done by any city department before it
comes to the Planning Board, and then on to the city council. He feels that all of us would
benefit by a more thorough investigation on the part of the city.
Cal states that we need better wording on the home occupation application in regards to staying
in compliance or losing their home occupation and business license.
Motion by Kate Stevenson, second by Laurel Haggart to recommend to the City Council that we
have to have broader department review and that all owners of business licenses that have home
4
occupations must stay in compliance with current home occupation requirements or lose their
home occupation and business license. Motion carried 6-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 p.m..
Respectfully submitted,
Cheryll Lund, Secretary
5
E1SHALL
W ST S:T6Z8-4796 CRY Of Laurel
WATER OFC.6 28-7431
COURT:628-1964 P.O. Box 10 ~
FAX:628-2241 Laurel, Montana 59044
PLANNING BOARD
DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FORM
The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described
property requests a Zone Change/Land Use Variance as outlined in
the City Zoning Ordinance :
Q
From /z A J e 44 /Af-ea I Zone
To IsDif '0WA#4koK cr e Zone
a,+� P" g 6Ar- dL a d d OL .4 i ' .
1 . Legal description of prope ty: S ,S 44 0
2 . General location:
3f ea
3 . Proposed use: Mg& 1L e -tcc.e
4 . Owner (s) U) 1 /e"X H4 XL ke S A.l zj /Y"ke z
(recorded o er)
k a
. (address)
!a. L'rI1
(phone number)
pp
5 . Agent (s) : a ~w �G�y' e� 141 x` a
( ame) a t.� �a:Aj S 0 .tJ
(phone umber) .2 5
6 . Covenants or deed restrictions on property: Yes No_X
(if yes, include copy)
I understand that the filing fee accompanying this application is
not refundable, that it pays part of the cost in processing, and
that the fee does not constitute a payment for a Zone Change/Land
Use Variance . Also, that all the information. presented is true and
correct. PETITIONER MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARINGS.
PETITION NO
r
FEE PAID
PETITIONER' S SIGNATURE c
lave.zcwu" CITY OF LAUREL
115 W. lst
. �®. ®® �s �� dam►.
�r �■ ®� rrr �■
NOS
A
uVir .
GNOME w
' � !NII11i IIIII!°=!II II'-.I�III
�I i
�I
gI --fill L-
s��p', �lula
rlll'8111; IINI 111
CITY HALL
115W. 1STS Cityof Laurel
PUB WORKS:: 628-4796
OTER OFC:628-7431
uRT:628-1964 P.O. Box 10
A ^IIREL
AX:628-2241
Laurel, Montana 59044
P T.AATN T 7\IG—
DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
KUKES 99-12-2
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Laurel-Yellowstone City-County
Planning Board will hold a Public Hearing on Thursday, December 2 ,
1999 at 7 : 00 p .m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall , Laurel ,
Montana, for the purpose of reviewing a proposed zone change to
Residential Manufactured Homes with the south 300 ' strip being
zoned Highway Commercial for the following described property:
Rossmoor Subdivision, Lot 3 , Block 1, located in the S1/2 ,
Section 8 , T2S, R24E, P .M.M.
Information concerning this proposed change can be obtained at the
office of the Public Works Director, 115 W. First Street, Laurel ,
Montana . Anyone wishing to protest or speak in favor of the
proposed change may appear at this hearing with or without counsel .
John H. Smith, Chairman
Published: 11/17/99 & 11/24/99
November 18, 1999
Laurel City/County Planning
City of Laurel
PO Box 10
Laurel, MT 59044
RE: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
new proposed zone change
Rossmoor Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 1 , located in the S1 /2,
Section 8, T2S, R24E, P.M.M.
Dear John Smith and members of the board,
Here we go again! Round 2 .
I am OPPOSED to the new zone change proposal for Residential
Manufactured Homes and Highway Commercial at this time.
Again, I must express my opposition for the following reasons ;
1 . It will lower our property values.
2. It will highly increase traffic on West 4th Street (Trace
Lane) This street is NOT designed for any heavier traffic than
it has and we don' t want it.
3.The next step after a zone change will be an unwanted
FLAGPOLE annexation to the city of Laurel.
4.We have an irrigation system in our agricultural section
that will be tampered with and we can not have that disturbed
by non members of the West City Ditch Company. We do not draw
enough ditch water to accomodate more residents in this area.
This land MUST be kept agriculture. Our intelligence is being
insulted by seeing the lot 3 zone proposal. Once lot 3 is
rezoned all of Block 1 will be easier to rezone and then the
intrapment of FLAGPOLE annexation is available.
The water and sewer lines West 4th Street (Trace Lane) are
private lines and by law cannot be tapped into without
annexation. I, too, am not able to tap into this line from my
home. Any tampering into these lines by this proposed zone change
WILL result in court action.
Please be advised to turn down this new proposed zone change.
Just for the record, enclosed is a copy of a letter that
recently ran in the LAUREL OUTLOOK. I received many positive
compliments in agreement but not one rebuttal. Please read.
S ' erel
Russell BrW-�
1121 West 4th Street
Laurel, MT 59044
Gloria Allwin
185 Golf Course Road
Laurel, MT 59044
Home Phone 40&&28-8800
Email QBGloria@aol.com
November 19, 1999
LaurelNellowstone City County planning Board
City of Laurel
PO Box 10
Laurel, MT 59044
Dear Planning Board Members,
We have recently been notified that a meeting has been scheduled to review the proposed zone change
allowing manufactured homes on the Bill Kukes property. We are not able to attend the meeting as we
will be out of town, but we wanted to voice our opinion especially since this land borders our property to
the west.
We are very much against allowing manufactured homes on the property as it we strongly feel it will
decrease the value of our property. We have seen these type of subdivisions in the Laurel area and
they are generally not kept up, become trashy, and even though we know some very nice people who
live in those areas, there are also a lot of drug problems in those locations because they are generally
low income. After all the trouble given to the O'toole family over their manufactured home on West
Maryland Lane, we don`t understandwhy you wouldeven consider allowing a whole subdivision of these
type of homes. Furthermore, in 1993, we came to you for permission to allow a `temporary' mobile home
on our property to live in while building our new home, and we were told under no uncertain terms, we
were only allowed to have it there for nine months and we would be charged if it were to remain longer.
Yet, you are considering a zone change for a subdivision of these homes??
A zone change and development of this type will also add extra problems for the city to allow water and
sewer to this property as that ground is not suitable for septic systems. This development would also
affect the natural drainage of our property. It would also add more free roaming dogs which would be a
great problem for us who have livestock. We have had problems before and do not wish to have them
again. In the past, we have lost calves to roaming dogs, and also have had our horses injured because
dogs have terrorized them. We forsee this happening again if this subdivision is allowed.
Because of these reasons, we wish our voices to be heard ggainst the zoning for a manufactured home
subdivision.
Sincerely,
Dennis and Gloria Allwin
185 Golf Course Rd.
Laurel, MT 59044
MEMO
SUBJECT: Findings and Conclusions Regarding Rossmoor
Subdivision Zone Change Request
TO: Laurel Zoning Commission
FROM: Cal Cumin, Laurel Planning Director
DATE: January 6, 2000
LEGAL COMMENTS
The Laurel Municipal Code (17.72.050 (G)) requires that, "The planning director shall
report his findings and conclusions in writing to the rezoning commission, which report
shall be a matter of public record."
State code (MCA 76-2-304) requires that local governments take into consideration
during deliberations on proposed zone changes the `Purposes of zoning': (1) Such
regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen
congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote
health and the general welfare;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the
overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;to facilitate the
adequate provision of transportation, water, schools, parks, and other public requirements.
(2) Such regulations shall be made with reasonable consideration, among other things, to
the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with a view
to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land
throughout such municipality.
State code (MCA 76-2-305(2)) provides that when a protest against a proposed zone
change is signed by the owners of 25% or more of the area of the lots within 150 feet from
the subject zone change, such amendment shall not be come effective except by the
favorable vote of two-thirds of all the members of the city council; there is such valid legal
protest.
SPECIFICS OF ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
The applicants have requested a zone change on Lot 3, Block 1, Rossmoor Subdivision,
an area of 28.870 acres. The request is from Residential Tracts (a zone requiring one-acre
minimum tracts of land for single-family residential) to Residential Manufactured Homes
(RMH) for the north approximately 24 acres of the property and to Highway Commercial
(HC) for the south 300 feet--or about 4 acres--of the property.
1
PURPOSES OF ZONING
In reference to `purposes of zoning': The manufactured housing part of the application
request complies with the Comprehensive Plan in that the area is planned as residential.
The requested Highway Commercial does not comply in that the Comprehensive Plan
limits commercial use in this area to south of Main. However, it is very difficult to limit
commercial land uses to just one side of a street. The proposed zoning is not designed to
lessen congestion in the streets; however, if the project develops, the traffic circulation
system will be designed to accommodate traffic in accordance with appropriate design
standards. The same applies to considerations for undue concentration of population and
adequate water, schools, parks, and other public requirements,
Regarding reasonable consideration to the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for manufactured housing: I do not feel that a properly designed, constructed,
and maintained manufactured housing subdivision introducing Class A (new)
manufactured homes will adversely impact the existing neighborhood.
CONSIDERATIONS
This request is apparently in consideration by the agent (Brown for Hansen) of buying the
property from the present owners (Kukes). The request for the south approximately 300
feet to be zoned HC would match similar zoning of most of the property across Highway
10 to the south. (Figgins has some RMH zoning to the southeast across the highway.) I
do not feel the request for HC zoning is a problem as it is a compatible use given the
arterial transportation status of Highway 10 and the similar, existing zoning to the south.
The remaining acreage of the subject property would be zoned RMH if the request is
granted. All of this property is surrounded to the east, west, and north by Residential
Tracts zoning (RT), an area marked by single-family, mostly site-built homes on large lots;
vacant land also makes up the land use composite of the area.
Access to the site currently is via Trace Lane (4th Street) on its east side and Highway 10
on its south side. The property is not adjacent to the City; the boundary of the latter is
approximately 1700 feet to the east just north of and adjacent to Trace Lane. The highest
point of the land area is about two-thirds of the way--east to west--across the top of the
parcel where the elevation is 3358 feet mean sea level. The land slopes to the southeast to
a low point of about 3312 feet. State law requires that lots smaller than one acre in size
(such as those proposed in this project) must have either central water or sewer systems--
or both--to be subdivided.
No inventory of RMH-zoned land--or the amount of the land that is vacant--is available at
present (it will be forthcoming after the completion of the City's current TCSP planning
project). The Planning Board has indicated in the past its unwillingness to rezone at its
own initiative, more land to RMH. Rather it has indicated that such rezoning should come
2
from the private sector at the time of development. This request falls under the latter
condition.
The next step in development, if zoning is granted by the City Council, is to go through
the subdivision process. The City of Laurel exercises extra territorial zoning one mile
beyond its municipal limits. If the land were to be subdivided into small lots as planned, it
would have to annex to the City of Laurel. The City of Laurel, would, therefore, also
exercise approval authority over the subdivision process even though it is currently in the
County.
Subdivision is the detailed planning that is required for actual platting of the land. During
the subdivision planning process, all of the issues that might impact locating housing on
the site must be analyzed, documented, and presented to the Planning Board, the public,
and the City Council for review and discussion--and approval. The size and location of
lots, blocks, and streets must be engineered on a preliminary plat. This plat requires that
all of the lots and streets be surveyed and drawn in detail (as differing from the more
generalized sketches of a proposed master plan). The preliminary plat preparation must
include analysis of soil and subsurface conditions and the impact of such things and soil
stability and high ground water on housing location and road construction. The
transportation system must show what is proposed on-site as well as the impact of the
whole development on the roads off the property that lead to it. If Trace Lane, for
example, must be widened to provide the required standard of service for this project, the
developers will have to share in the cost of doing that. If the existing water line has to be
enlarged to serve the new development, the subdividers must share in the cost of that--or
maybe pay for all of it. In addition to ground water, surface water runoff and existing
irrigation systems must be considered and appropriately addressed. The impact on
municipal services such as fire, police, schools, etc. must be documented.
An important part of the platting process is the preparation of and submission by the
developers of a Subdivision Improvements Agreement. This is a contract between the
City and the property owners spelling out exactly what improvements are required, when
such improvements are to be constructed, and how same are to be financed. Such
improvements as landscaping requirements and park land maintenance are also spelled out
in this Agreement--which is a binding contract on the developers.
During the preliminary platting process, the adjacent property owners are notified by mail
of the public hearing before the Planning Board at which plat is presented; the Planning
Board is the board designated by the City Council in Ordinance 16.56.060 to conduct the
public hearing required under State law. At the public hearing, which is advertised in the
Laurel Outlook, people can speak their minds about the proposal pro or con. The
decision as to whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the subdivision is up to
the City Council after the latter receives the recommendations of the Planning Board.
•
3
12/02/99 14:39 FAX 406+628+2241 CITY OF LAUREL LO Oa
MY HALL ORBS::
628.4796 CityOf Laurel
l l�wR]ST S
OFC:628-7431
COURT:628-1964 P.O.BOX 10
FAX Gas-anal La,ureL Maniana,59044
PLANNING HOARD
DFpAR'IMEN '
APPLICATION FORM- SPECIAL REVIEW
The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described
property requests a Special Review as outlined in the City Zoning
Ordinance :
Legal Description: Lot 2 Block: 1 Entertainment Park, Subdivision
General Description (address) :East Railroad Street
ATTACH MAP SHOWING 13ZKE TSIONS, ACREAGE AND LOCATION OF TRACT;
Owner of Tract: Outdoor Excitement Inc . / Ernie Dutton
Mailing address : nle.tro Realtors , 2029 Grand Avenue Billings , MT 59102
Phone Number: 406-245-9300
Attach site plan: X
Time Schedule for development: Spring 2000
Special Review request:
To allow a wood truss and wall panel manufacturing plant including outside
storage of raw materials and finished product .
T understand that the filing fee accompanying this application
is not refundable and that it pays part of the cost in processing.
Also, that all information presented is true and correct .
Petitioner' s Signature: -"
Petition No. _4 q9--oi-C(C
Fee paid and date_ -:a- all
Cecw.sR.
City Of Laurel is as EEO Employer
Equal Housing Opportunity
10;08/89 08\d8 FAX 90e V828+2241
CITY OF LAUREL to 05
O tl \\\
rn
Z) v I \\\
z
3NVl
\\\ \`.n
a \
y
\ � 1
m �1
s
N a
C
V W
f
z
8 I k I
Y \ /
.............. ....
\
ncd
w
J 01
W w t\1\ V]
� t t�
1/17/99 12:34 FAX 1 701 774 0316 Plum Building 1002
o
DRAFTING
cn V rm
r a & DESIGN -� c
r--a AI,A N STEvEN LOVE _ z
;490 1 TERRY AVE
- BILLINGS, MT 59102 Z t c
HM: 651-8731 -
,�_.
--......._... ...............lC,�h...R�[�,RQq�?....ST$.EET. ........................,..~.... ...................,
° 3
�� j
G
n_
r
LOT 2
10 ACRES
IS
a
va
0
N
SCALE: r - 126-
T -d zwaacce -ZoTa wnt J vrtiL L T T ac J T ^6LI
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF LAUREL
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
1. Name of applicannt:� C�n'( rr<' Tel: '4C6.
2. Name of business: , ` hod
[��
3. _-address of applicant_Yf a�
4. x Proposed address of business/temporary use:4 I I
5. Type of temporary use
Group 2 Temporal—v Use. This group consists of temporary uses of
property continuing for longer than forty-eight(48) but less-than thirty (30) days.
Examples of Group 2 Temporan,Uses are carnivals, circuses, Ch ristnxnas tree sales, etc.
-)(- Group 3 Temporary Use. This group consists of temporary uses of
property continuing for longer than thirty (30) days but less titan one (1)year.
a. The following temporary uses may be allowed in this group:
(1) greenhouses or other similar seasonal-oriented uses, as
determined by the Planning Board, shall be exempt from below subsection (b) Location
and Time Restrictions; or
(2) Other uses, such as car out expresso stands, as allowed in
the appropriate zoning districts.
b. Location and Time Restrictions.
(1) _-any Group 3 temporary use/structure existing upon
adoption of this chapter, shall be deemed a legal nonconforming use. All existing legal
Group 3 nonconforming temporary uses/structures. as of the effective date of this chapter
or any amendment hereto, shall be removed or become a permanent use by complying
with the Uniform Building Code, site development standards, and any other federal, state,
or local requirements within.tvvo (2) years from the date of the ennactnnent of this chapter or
any amendment Hereto.
(2) The owner/operator may. at any time during the two (2)
years as a Group 3 temporary use, become a pennanent use by complying -vyith the
Uniform Building Code. site development standards, and any other federal, state, or local
requirements.
(3) Any Group 3 temporary use/structure which does not exist
upon adoption of this chapter shall meet the supplemental standards in below subsection
(e) and shall also be removed when the two (2) year amortization period in above
subsection (1) expires.
Page 2 of 2
6. Standards:
a. Two (2) signs not to exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area and eight(8)
feet in height shall be allowed, excluding A-frame signs, and shall be removed along with
the temporary use when the approved tune limit or temporary use/structure permit has
expired.
b. The temporary use must provide sufficient space to accommodate the
structure and off-street parking for customer and use-related vehicles. The parking area,
.driving lanes, and egress/ingress shall be paved, and the site shall be approved by the City
Engineer if within the municipal limits of Laurel or by the County Office of Public Works
if located outside of Laurel but`yitlun its one (1) mile zoning jurisdiction.
C. Clear sight vision for site ingress and egress shall be provided as approved
by the City Engineer if within the Laurel municipal limits or b,%-the County Office of
Public Works if outside of Laurel but within its one (1) mile zoning jurisdiction.
d. Access to public right-of-way shall be approved by the City Engineer if
within the municipal limits of:Laurel or by the County Office of Public Works if outside
of Laurel but within its one (1) mile zoning jurisdiction.
e. Application for a temporary use/structure permit shall be made at the City
Public Works Department to the Planning Board at least one (1) month ahead of the
Planning Board's regularly scheduled meeting date accompanied by a one hundred dollar
($100) application review fee.
7. Pernxit required:
Before any Group 2 or Group 3 Temporary Use or Structure is established the
property owner shall obtain a temporary use/structure permit, as delineated above. Iii
addition, the property owner shall post a fifteen hundred dollar($1,500) nnnoney order or
cashiers check with the City of Laurel to ensure timely removal of the use and'or stricture.
8. A copy of the site plan shoving the above referenced requirements must
accompany this application.
9. _approval of proposed plan by City Engineen-County Public Works Office:
a�
10. After approval by the Planning Board, applicant needs to obtain a business license
from the Citv.
FARKN--LLOT PLAN
�CA-E:
POAR Pci,-
0-0
Lij
FUEL ISLAND
9i
FUEL ISLAND
40-0 9-0
FEW. -I
CULVERTS
51-0
-MOURWMUDDROMM
CITY OF LAUREL
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION
And Plan of Annexation
1 . Only parcels of land adjacent to the City of Laurel municipal
limits will be considered for annexation. "Adjacent to" also
includes being across a public right of way. If the parcel to
be annexed is smaller than one city block in size (2 . 06
acres) , the City Council must approve consideration of the
request; the applicant must make a separate written request
to the City Council (for parcels smaller than a city block)
stating their wish to annex a parcel of land less than one
city block in size- and do so prior to fillincr out and
submitting this Request for_Annexation.
2 . Applicant landowner' s name : f} .v:,4, 3R0V4f=— 5
address : U',,7-% 7 O/J-i-.r-v6s 59104
telephone :
3 . Parcel to be annexed: (if it is not surveyed or of public
record, it must be of public record prior to applying for
annexation) . .
Legal Description: 2 A ELt,<
Size :_3 S x ,Z��`'! 0445r .,_.-
Present Use : /.c> T
Planned use : 13,u 1-3!5�l
Present Zoning:
(Land which is being annexed becomes zoned R-7500 when it is
officially annexed (City Or. 17 . 12 .220 .F)
4 . City services : The extension of needed City services shall be
at the cost of the applicant after annexation by the City has
been approved. As part of the application process, each of
the following City services must be addressed:
Water Service :
Location of existing main: r�Ra r'.R s �_V fr-7 CIT >✓I?Ll AJ
Cost of extension of approved service : i5L t17 -7T r( r
How cost determined:
Timeframe for installation:
How financed: 1
1
Sewer Service :
Location of existing main: 5"
Cost of extension of approved service : � v 5
How cost determined: fI f 5 p --a i-fC
Timeframe for installation: 2� ST/9' [-t-)= 4)
How financed: H p
Streets :
Location of existing paved access : 1 5T CV;f-5-r-
Cost of paving: How determined:
Timeframe for construction:
Other required improvements : Provide above information on attached
pages .
S . A map suitable for review of this application of the proposed
area to be annexed must be submitted with this application.
6 . A written Waiver of Protest must accompany this application,
suitable for recording and containing a covenant to run with
the land to be annexed, waiving all right of protest to the
creation by the City of any needed improvement district for
construction or maintenance of municipal services . This
Wavier of Protest must be signed by the applicant prior to
annexation by the City.
7 . Requests for annexations are referred to the City-County
Planning Board for recommendation to the City Council .
Applicants should contact the planning representative prior to
filling out this application.
8 . Within thirty (30) days after receiving the properly filled
out application with all required accompaniments and after
conducting a duly advertised public hearing, the City-County
Planning Board shall make recommendation to the City Council
as to this Request for Annexation. If more information is
needed from the applicant during the review of the
application, such application shall be deemed incomplete and
the timeframe for reporting to the City Council extended
accordingly, if needed.
9 . An application fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) must
accompany the submission of this application.
The City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, after review
and consideration of this Application for Annexation found such to
be in the best interest of the City, that it complied with State
code, and approved this request at its City Council meeting of :
form.annex
2
s • sr
��'-`�L�y�.��.S�C��' 4i.�'�`"iiaxr•'°""'°" MW - t�.e� xi:.""Y::,ii;S.:-,a3;:Y`;•L:c:-
r'Yr -
x tt
Y -
_s
T''F
_ V t '= -
Y
hf-
d r v':
ti
4'• S
a'
�3 L'.r
au r:
s�
m erg d=
- ;
:�...' _ -
!A -
e n�
:a �Y
9 4 t -
r u
k
- an Co
a
fsr`
`th'
� C
y; -
�.x
'Yh 1
L a
_ r_ m ac
151017.
.
a - Q�.
m -
nd
F.
SiT -
L
4 2 R•�0 i c�it. r:y 1 � _c�: { N TS'J �
ti
%f -
`3:
a
r Y
�I Q
Tl L r O•
We
S.
O ri
r " -
e:
Co.
r
and
- s
e ?n. -s
on
cue n u
- H�
_,Y
a'r 1�
Y ri
Lu�
d: i -
2T
s
}.
4 CO
• k Ie�:
u
7 SCALE
o.-
. - - - '-
:.:? STATE OF MONTAN it l
� -
-'3`-3c,.c -...;.: ty of•Yell wetan -.�:. ,' _ - _ - -. - -,- -
This iaetramen ;iSHEET -
-., t xea ht..in my affirr of 2 S HE EIS
T,ft� ii-L-2a.-Ia —
th
EP
. .;t<``h:, - N rr'at /•.; 1-S a'dock_�i:i - - - _.LeT'Z14 _-
-.Z. 1aaa LH.IiLUhDT _ S CGo yfeoy Tn•6 i7YSEt2 i'!Cr
CoantpCIer &Recorder'. NOINT OF BEGPNNINGi
12 fh DePut: - - - ., LoY 3A
STREET Being NE Car.Lat'4
z Block 4,Lourmac Sut•Amended
31Q.dO'
WE FTM STR ET
i
e
I
L -=� 0
�- : c K�
i
.o
0 5
'
/ A *T.R-B R
g }Yi 7H
t 5T!C I!
Chl I
,3
'A.n •r2 Qi..
+ 11 �:
ff i
1
2 A
A
�r
a n
a�
Ric
R Sha erCons Construct]
[ 84 4
a'
v tru tf n.-
.a 5 5
:t z h ff-
0 4• i.t �
•n
3'f
4 8:V
.f 3. 27 Residence I Re� nce for Alan Broyles
-S n I- � s ff.
i.
r
. West ,zt,St
�
f.
F
�L 1 3: [ j
rJSO
A EA _
�i Laurel MT,
MA
P
P
ER.r -
CER
TIFICATE OF �EI}iCATiONs.•.r'�:.,.:i:'.`::_:'. .' .. .- •- -. �.: - �.: :...:..„-.•.S-z::,:;.:'.:.'' '• - - - rt
�9-No-9 STATE. ;.. T_. dated: v 9
:'i..-'>•: +.$' .::'-;: E 6F MONTANA. ,...r - -. - .- ... -f. _
h.
-,
:s - a a:
1
'County-of Yela� _ .S
P9
l w a /s! T -
�i:
' vunw a r i ■
ruccr oo ec rarre.
Wn -f