HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity/County Planning Board Minutes 08.04.2005DRAFT
MINUTES
Laurel-Yellowstone City-County Planning Board
August 4, 2005 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Members Present:
Others Present:
Gerald Shay, Chairman
Greg Johnson, County Rep.
David Oberly, County Rep.
Clarence Foos, County Rep.
Rick Flanagan, County Rep.
Hazel Klein, City Rep.
Dan Koch, City Rep.
Ed Thurner, City Rep.
Ca] Cumin, City Planner
cherylI Lund, City Secretary
The minutes of July 7, 2005 were approved as sent out.
Public Hearing - Special Review - 1202 E. Railroad Street- Expansion of Fiberglass Structures
The City County Planning Board convened as the Laurel Zoning Commission.
Rob Harris, owner of Fiberglass Structures, has requested that Fiberglass Structures be allowed to
expand into the vacant Plum Building Systems building located at 1202 E. Railroad Street, and to allow
manufacturing in a Highway Commercial zone. He will purchase the building.
Public Heayjng notices were sent out to ail property within 300 feet.
Opponents: None.
Cal recommended approval of the proposed use of the site, and said that this type of use was what the
area was originally intended for until we changed it for a proposed water park.
Motion by Bud Johnson, second by David Oberly, to recommend approval of the Special Review
to allow Fiberglass Structures to expand their business into 1202 E. Railroad Street and to allow them to
manufacture in a Highway Commercial Zone. Motion carried 8-0.
Public Hearing - Zone Change to RLMF for Tracts A-1 & B-1 C/S # 2039 - Patrick Mullaney
Mary Sickle, Patrick Mullaney's daughter, was present to speak regarding this proposed zone change.
Mary stated that Patrick would like to build a single-family home (28' X 60') and a garage (24' X 40')
on parcel B-1 that he plans to live in. It will be fenced and landscaped.
The north parcel, Tract A-1 is planned for multi-family once E. 11th Street is extended.
Opponents:
Debra Horsing, 1051 Montana spoke in opposition. She stated that Mr. Mullaney doesn't need the
RLM~ zone change for his single-family home. RLMF will create extra traffic and the alley will
become a street.
Bob Eastlick, 1017 Montana spoke in opposition. He is wondering how the home will be able to meet
city building codes and setbacks. There is already enough RLMF in the area. This is a front so that Iron
Horse Subdivision can get access to their lots. The drain ditch cannot move. The existing land is not
being taken care of, as there are weeds and junk. They do not need another mess.
Dorine CJratwohl, 1009 Montana spoke in opposition. Originally Clarence Sonstegard gave Patrick
Mullaney the land so that he could plant trees. Mr. Mullaney never planted trees and now it is just
weeds and a mess. Dorine passed around a picture taken on 8-3-05 showing the height of the weeds.
George Metzger, 215 E. Maryland spoke in opposition. Mr. Mullaney has not fenced the land. There
are weeds and junk that create a fire hazard. He stated that Mr. Mullaney moved the ditch and he
(George Metzger) got blamed for it. George went on to say that he keeps his property clean and Mr.
Mullaney doesn't.
Proponent Rebu~:
Mary Sickle stated that the weeds have ,been mowed, recently. Mary would like to see the board
approve this zone change so that her parents, who are in poor health can move closer to her and her
family. They would be able to help Mr. Mul!aney keep the weeds cut.
At this tim-e~the public hearing was closed (7:23 pm). '
A legal'~rotest was received on this zone change application. (see attached)
Discussion by board. Clarification on request was given on B-1 being single-family dwelling and A-1
being RLMF. RLMF allows maximum of 4 units on 10,000 square feet of land. A-1 could not be
accessible until E. 11t~ Street is developed. In the future A-1 could be subdivided to allow more than 4
units, a process that would have to go through this Board and the City Council.
The Board felt that the application was confusing. Mr. Mullaney gave a letter of clarification on what he
was asking for and this was different than what was on the application. (See attached letter from Mr.
Mullaney).. ' '
Col recommends approval of A-1 being zoned for single family dwelling and B-1 to RL1VI~. (See
attached "Findings and Conclusions".
Motion by Rick Flanagan, second by Dan Koch, to request that this submittal be resubmitted to
reflect single family on the lower part and. RLMF on the upper par~, and a legible map be submitted.
Motion carried 7-1.
This application will go to the City Council with a recommendation of denial for the zone change;
however, after seeing the issues presented at the public hearing he recommends denial of the application.
Public Hearing - Zone Change - 1221 & ,1303 Old Highway i0 West - to RMH - Ed Foster
Leslie Foster was present to'/'equ~st 'a~'iofle ~hange from Residential Tracts to Residential Manufactured
Home for the front part of the property. There are 2 existing homes located in the front 3 acres and one
of those homes has been tom down and replaced by a 16' X 68'manufactured home. They are
requesting the zone change for the front of the property so that the manufactured home that has already
been placed is legal.
Opponents:
Charlie White, 2311 E. Maryland Lane, spoke in opposition. In checking with the zoning requirements
for RMH, in his estimation there can be a total of 10 manufactured homes brought into the property. He
has no problem with having a mx/mum of 2 manufactured homes on the property but he does not want
a trailer court. He feels this could be detrimental to the value of his adjacent property if the land around
it becomes a trailer park.
Marge Herman, 837 Old Highway 10 West, stated that the property that is asking to be rezoned is
already zoned residential commercial and therefore a manufactured home is allowed on it. She contacted
Yellowstone County and told her it was zoned residential commercial. She wonders why the applicant
has to go through this process, because the zoning is correct for what they want to do. She went on to
state that Cai had "re-colored" the zoning map and changed the zoning to deprive these people of their
land, and she knows he did so without anyone's knowledge. She told him he needed to wipe the smile
offof his face because he knows he is guilty of doing so. She went on to verbally abuse Cal for
approximately 3 minutes.
At tkis time 2 Bb~rd Members questioned her in regards to the relevance of her tirade to the zoning issue
before ihe Board, and it was indicated that Marge Herman was "out of order". Marge sat down.
Chairman Shay asked if there were any other opponents. There were none.
The public hearing was closed at 8:02 pm.
Discussion by board.
Cal stated that he is sticking with the recommendation as written (see attached). If the property is not
actually divided, as the owner has stated it is~ then he recommends that the application be denied.
Motion by Bud Johnson, second by Rick Flanagan, to approve the zone change as requested.
Motion falle~l by a vote of 0:8. The zone change will be passed on to the Laurel City Council with a
recommendation of denial.
Cal suggested that the owner re:apply for'a Coaditional Use for 1 mobile home.
3
Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat -Cherry Hills Subdivisions 3rd Filing - Tract 1 C/S 3034
Pat Davies, Engineering, Inc. spoke in regards to the preliminary plat.
The gross area of acres is 5.45 and the number of lots will be 17 with a minimum of 8,445 square feet
and maximum of 13,313 square feet.' The land use is vacant; existing zoning is Residential Tracts and
R-7500, and the intended use or purpose is for residential development. The subdivision area is being
proposed and platted as "An Addition to the City of Laurel," and the zoning will automatically become
R7500 at the time the plat and concu~ent aanexation are approved.
Jerry Neuman, owner and developer, spoke. He has previous built homes in Laurel and is looking
forward to building more.
Opponents:
Cindy Hansen, -1030 Betty Avenue spoke. She is not actually against the proposal, but she is concerned
with the low water pressure that exists in Cherry Hills Subdivision.
Bob Koop, 1020 Betty Avenue spoke. Although he is not against the proposal, he is also concerned
with the low water pressure and does not want the citizens of Lanrel to have to pay for more water
services.
Rebuttal:
Pat Davies stated that the developer is aware of the low water pressure problems and there are plans for
putting in a pump station. The developer will comply with whatever the Public Utilities Director feels
is needed to address Short.and long~term issues in the subdivision area.
The public~earing {vas closed at 8:34 pm. '
Discussion by Board.
Cai recommended approval of the subdivision subject to:
1. DEQ approval;
2. Yellowstone County Weed requirements are met;
3. approval by the Public Utilities Director; and
4. approval by the ?ublic Works Dlrector.
He said that this is a logical and.~miform extension of the City's growth westward, and it
complies with the City's C, rox~.lh Management Plan· The latter encourages growth adjacent to the City
where small lots can connect to and geceive centralized water and sewer services. This site is also
import/mt'in the':l~ng-rar/ge plantiing for City infrastructure (large water and sewer mains and the
extension of the minor arterial street -Maryland Avenue)·
Motion by David Oberty, second by Bud lohnson, to recommend approval of the preliminary
plat for Cherry Hills Subdivision, 3rd F~iling, subject to the recommendations by Cai Cumin, City
Planner. Motion
6arried,8-0.
4
Public Hearin~ -'~Delete Chapter i7.64 - Board of Adiustments
Cal explained that the City Council took away the Board of Adjustments ability to change land use
several years ago and the Planning'Board has been hearing variance requests since that time. The issue
of what to do with the Board due to lack'of interest and attendance has been a problem, and, since the
Board is a legal appeals board, the City.needs to be careful how it is supposed to do its business. The
Board of Adjustments is not to be confu'sed with the Board of Appeals, an existing board that hears
building code disputes.
Cai recommends that the Board be dissolved and the chapter of the Zoning Ordinance describing its
function be repealed.
Opponents: None.
Motion by Bud Iohnson, second by David Oberly to recommend that chapter 17.64 of the
L.M.C. be deleted. Motion carried 7-1.
Public Input
Marvin Brown, owner and developer of Iron Horse Station Subdivision spoke to the board and updated
them on the land deal with St. John's Lutheran Ministries.
Marvin donated Lot 7, of Block 3 to St. Johns for a nursing home. St. Johns accepted the land and is to
submit a plan for the nursing home within 90 days. The stipulation will be that they will begin
construction with!n a year and complete the construction within 2 years. The Board thanked Marvin for
his update, and Cai reminded him to be sure and be at the City Council's public hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Cheryll Lund, Secretary
5
C~ r¥ hALL
IISW. lST ST,
PUB WORKS: 628-4796
WATER CFC: 628-7431
COURT: 628-1964
FAX: 628-2241
City Of Laurel
P.O. Box 10
Laurel, Montana 59044
PLANNING BOARD
DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FORM- SPECIAL REVIEW
The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described
property requests a Special Review as outlined in the City Zoning
ordinance: ~O.V-7_..~i ~kOO~-l, ~d'~.-~'I"-JM~M~-kI~ F~/'~'4C'- ~ ~ ~P~
Legal Description:
General Description (address): ~ ~[~Q ~~
ATTACE ~P S~OWING DIMENSIONS, ACREAGE ~ LOCATION OF T~CT:__
Owner of Tract: ~~ ~ ~ ~5
Mailing address: l~5 ~ 0~6~ ~D.~ ~~
Phone Nu~er: ~ - ~
Attach site plan:
Time Schedule for development:
Special Review request:
I understand that the filing fee accompany}ng this application
is not refundable and that i~ays~art of/th~ cost
in
processing.
A1 so, that all informa~~ed~Lrue and correct.
Petitioner's Signature~~_
Petition No.:
Fee paid and date:
CITY I-~(L L
llSW. 1STST
PUB WORKS: 52g-47~6
WATER OFC: 628-7431
COURT:
FAX: 628-2241
City Of Laurel
P.O. Box 10
Laurel, Montana 59044
APPLICATYON FORM
P - ,~%_~ NI~ iNG BOglD
The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described
property requests a Zone Change/Land Use Variance as outlined in
the City Zoning Ordinance:
Prom ~T
Zone
Zone
Legal description of property: 7';~-3 ~-/ ¥ ~-/ _,
Proposed use: ~/~.
5 . Agent (s) :
(recorded owner)
(address)
(phone number
(name)
(address)
(phone number)
Covenants or deed restrictions on property: Yes__ No ~
(if yes, include copy)
I understand that the filing fee accompanying this application is
not refundabler that it pays part of the cost in processing, and
that the fee does not constitute a payment for a Zone Ckange/Land
Use Variance. Also, that all the information presented is true and
correct. PETITIONER MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARINGS.
PETITION NO. 0E-]/Ft{[[~%ey
/
FEE PAIDX ~ ~~~
PETITIONER' S SiGNAT DATE
City Of Laurel is an EEO Employer
Equal Housing Opportunity
CITY Of LAUREL
1 !5 W. lst
P.O. Box i0
,~aurel, Montana o~044
COLDR~DD
MEMO
SUBJECT:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Findings and Conclusions Regarding Zone Change
Request for Tracts A- 1 and B- 1 of Certificate of Survey
2039
Laurel Zoning Commission
Cai Cnrnin~ Laurel Planning Director
August 4, 2005
LEGAL COMMENTS
The Laurel Municipal Code (17.72.050 (G)) requires that, "The planning director shall report kis
findings and conclusions in writing to the rezoning commission, which report shall be a matter of
public record."
State code (MCA 76-2-304) requires that local governments take into consideration during
deliberations on proposed zone changes the 'Purposes of zoning': (I) Such regulations shall be
made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets;
to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to
provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration
of population; to facilitate the adequate provision oftransportatinn, Water, schools, parks, and
other public requirements. (2) Such regulations shall be made with reasonable consideration,
among other things, to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses
and with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout such municipality.
State code (MCA 76-2-305(2)) provides that when a protest against a proposed zone change is
signed by the owners of 25% or more of the area of the lots within 150-feet from the subject zone
change, such amendment shall not be come effective except by the favorable vote of two-thirds of
all the members of the city council.
SPECWICS OF ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
The applicant has requested a zone change from Residential Tracts to Residential Limited Multi-
Family (RLMF) for his property which consists of two tracts sandwiched between the alley west
of Colorado Avenue and what will someday be Colorado Avenue and between what willb e the
extension of 11~ Street to the east and Maryland Lane. The applicant says he plans to build and
live in a single-family home on the south parcel. The Planning Board has recommended
approval of annexation of this property to the City which is contiguous on the west side.
The site is currently zoned Residential Tracts and is part of that transitional land use area around
the City largely made up of such zoning. Along the west side of the property the zoning is
Residential Limited Multi-Family, and Residential 7500 borders the property to the north and
south.
CONSIDERATIONS
In reference to "purposes of zoning:" The proposed rezoning is not contrary to Laurel's Growth
Management Plan (GM2P) which does support kigher densities within the areas of the commtmitiy
served by public systems such as water and sewer facilities. The proposed zoning will not impact
the existing street traffic adversely in that the streets are designed to handle much higher traffic
flows than currently experienced. The north parcel cannot be developed until IIt~ Street is
extended eastward and a bridge built over the ditch, construction that will probably have to be
paid for by private developers. The south parcel will be accessed via Maryland Lane.
The issues of "fire, panic, and other dangers" are adequately addressed by local emergency
service providers. Adequate light and air, the overcrowding of the land, and preventing undue
concentrations of population are not relevant issues, nor are anticipated impacts on schools, parks,
and other public facilities.
RECOIvlMENDATION
The south parcel is only 64 feet wide (and 339 feet long); a single-family house wilt have to be
carefully designed to meet zoning setbacks. Although, the applicant has requested RLMF for
both ~racts, it is recommended that the south parcel be left as single-family (R7500) similar to the
contiguous zoning to the south. The north tract will serve well as RLM[F once 11 ~ Street is
constructed, and the recommendation is to approve the requested zoning for this parcel.
2
DATE: August 1, 2005
TO:
Laurel-Yellowstone City-County planning Board
R.E7
C/S 2039 Tracts A-1 & B-1
North side of East Maryland in the 200 block
We, the undersigned noticed property owners, formally protest the proposed
zone change. At such time that the landowner and/or developer provides us
with the following information, we may reconsider our protest:
Site map showing all proposed improvements to or near the property,
including, but not limited to:
o Street rights-of-way for Colorado Avenue and East I 1~h Street
o Utilities
o Curb, gutter and sidewalks
o Street lighting
Site plan showing the exact use proposed for the parcel, including, but
not limited to:
o Location of buildings
o Square footage of structures
o Setbacks
o Points of ingress and egress - we will continue toprotest any
plan that increases traffic in the alley
o Detailed landscaping plan
o Detailed fencing plan, including a materials list
Detailed financial plan so that we can ensure that the proposed use of
the proposed units will be owner-occupied condominiums as opposed
to rental units - we will continue to protest any plan that allows for
rental units
HI
CITY HALL
llSW. 1ST ST.
?Lq3 WORKS: 628-4796
WATER OFC: 628-7431
COURT: 628-1964
FAX: 628-22~.i
City Of Laurel
P.O. Box 10
Lau.rel, Montana 59044
APPLICATION FORM
P LJL~TNiNG BOARD
DEPARTA<ENT
The undersigned as owner or agent of the following described
property requests a Zone Change/Land Use Variance as outlined in
the City Zoning Ordinance:
Zone
1. Legal description of
General location:
(recorded owner)
320
(address)
{phone number)
Agent (s) :
(name)
( address )
{phone number)
Covenants or deed restrictions on property: Yes No.~,
(if yes, include copy) -- .
I understand that the filing fee accompanying this application is
not refundable, that it pays part of the cost in processing, and
that the fee does not constitute a payment for a Zone Change/Land
Use Variance. Also, that all the information presented is true and
correct. PETITIONER MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARINGS.
PETITION NO. ~--~Z-
~EE PAZD ~Z6~,~
PETITIONER'S SiGNATURE_F~,~__~'
City Of Laurel .is an EEO Employer
Equal Housing Opportunity
DATE ~ ~ ~)~-
C~TY OF LAUREL
115 W./st
P.O. Box i0
Laurel, Montana 590~
F%rLL RECONVEYANCE
ALDEN PEDERSEN, of Billings, Montana, an attorney licensed to
practice law in the State of Montana, Trustee under a Trust
Indenture executed by EDWARD J. FOSTER and LESLIE FOSTER, husband
and wife, and DOUGLAS L. CAZIER and SUSAN CAZIER, husband and
wife, Grantor, dated September 10, 1997, for the benefit of MELVIN
C. VAdg BUREN and MARy LOU VAN BUREN, and recorded on Septe~oer 22,
1997, as Docu~uent No. 1891543, of the official records of the
office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Yellowstone County,
Montana, having been requested in writing by the holder of the
obligation secured by said Trust Indenture to reconvey the estate
granted to Trustee under said Trust Indenture, does hereby
reconvey, release and remise to the person or persons legally
entitled hereto, without warranty of any kind, all the estate,
title and interest acquired by Trustee under said Trust Indenture.
The real property is described as follows:
All of that certain piece and parcel of land in the
SE1/4 of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East,
P.M.M., in Yellowstone County, described as follows,
to-wit:
Beginning at a point one thousand nine hundred forty
(1,940) feet West of the Southeast (SE) corner SE1/4 of
Section Eight (8), running thence North 89 degrees 55'
West a distance of 139.5 feet, thence running North 0
degress 5' East a distance of 755 feet, thence running
South 89 degrees 55' East a distance of 865.5 feet,
thence running South 0 degrees 5' West a distance of
375 feet, thence running North 89 degrees 55' West a
distance of 726 feet, thence running South 0 degrees 5'
West a distance of 380 feet to the point of beginning.
Excepting therefrom a 30 foot strip of land along the
south boundary line of said parcel of land reserved for
public highway./#
DATED this 24th day of March, 2005.
ALDEN PEDA~EN, Trustee
STATE OF MONTANA )
: SS.
County of Yellowstone )
On this 24th day of March, 2005, before me, a Notary Public
for the State of Montana, personally appeared ALDEN PEDERSEN,
known to me to be the perso~ whose name is subscribed to the
within instrument as Trustee.
Notary Public for the~tate of Montana
Residing at Billings, Montana
My Commission Expires 12-28-2007
Peder~en & Har~
MEMO
SUBYECT:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Findings and Conclusions Regarding Zone Change
Request for 1303 US Highway 10 West
Laurel Zoning Commission
Cal Cumin, Laurel Planning Director
August 4, 2005
LEGAL COMMENTS
The Laurel Municipal Code (17.72.050 (G)) requires that, "The planning d/rector shall report his
Endings and conclusions in writing to the rezoning commission, which report shall be a matter of
public record."
State code (MCA 76-2-304) requires that local governments take into consideration during
deliberations on proposed zone changes the 'Purposes of zoning': (1) Such regulations shall be
made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets;
to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to
previde adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concenhation
of population; to facilitate the adequate provision oftrsnsportation, water, schools, parks, and
other public requirements. (2) Such regulations shall be made with reasonable consideration,
among other things, to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses
and with a view to conserving the value of bnildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land throughout such municipality.
State code (MCA 76-2-305(2)) provides that when a protest against a proposed zone change is
signed by the owners of 25% or more of the area of the lots within 150 feet from the subject zone
change, such amendment shall not be come effective except by the favorable vote of two-thirds of
all the members of the city council.
SPECIFICS OF ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
The applicant has requested a zone change from Residential Tracts to Residential Manufactured
Home. The site at 1303 US Highway 10 West formally contained an old white house that the
petitioner has removed and replaced with a new mobile home. The applicant plans to live in the
new mobile home, which he has placed on a permanent foundation, and feels that it is an
improvement to the neighborhood.
The site is adjacent to and west of a cement business (this is zoned Highway Commercial) that
contains several motor vehicles and a partially constructed pole barn; open fields lie to the west
which is a continuation of the existing Residential Tracts zoning. The site is across Highway 10
from existing Residential Manufactured Home zoning and is thus considered contiguous to an
existing zone to which the applicant wishes to change.
CONSIDERATIONS
In reference to "purposes of zoning:" The proposed rezoning is not contrary to Laurel's Growth
Management Plan (GMP) which does not support a continuous strip of commercial development
along Highway 10. Rather, such oommereial development--which is almost inevitable given the
planned west Laurel interstate interchange---needs to intempersed with open space and residential
hind uses. The proposed zoning will not change the street traffic as it is proposed as a single-
family dwelling, the same that previously existed.
The .issues of "fire, panic, and other dangers" are adequately addressed by local emergency
sermce providers. Adequate light and air, the overcrowding of the land, and preventing undue
concentrations ofpopulatinn are not relevant issues, nor are anticipated impacts on schools, parks,
and other public facilities. There is no change in density.
RECOMMENDATION
Given the considerations discussed herein, my recommendation is to approve this request for
zone change. However, in discussing this application with the landowner, he indicated that the
old house and now the new unit were located on a small parcel of land separate from the larger
acreage he owns. If this is not the case, and this application applies to the larger land area, the
application will have to be resubmitted and readvertised. If this is the case, the application should
be for Conditional Use to allow one mobile home only.
2
Property Owners List: Ed Foster Zone Change
1. Ed and Leslie Foster
320 W. 12th Street
Laurel, Mt. 59044
Robert and Rebecca Hagen
1514 Portal Dr.
Laurel, Mt. 59044
3. Timothy and Julie Hicks
% Gabriel Hink
3625 Banff Ave.
Billings, Mt. 59102
Williard and Patsy Hutsell
1306 Old Highway 10 W
Laurel, Mt. 59044
Carole, William and Jessie Kukes
330 Buffalo Trail Rd.
Laurel, Mt. 59044
Matriarch Construction, Inc.
4451 Palisades Park Dr.
Billings, Mt. 59106
G K & Margaret K Murphy
Murphy Trust
PO Box 1370
Red Lodge, Mt. 59068
Charles & Lynet White
2311 E. Maryland Ln.
Laurel, Mt. 59044
Wood's Powr-Grip Co., Inc.
PO Box 368
Laurel, Mt. 59044
To Wllom It May Concern
(print name)
zone change request for address, i221 & 1303 Old Highway 10 West.
am opposed to the
It does not conform to the current makeup of the area consisting of'
agriculture, highway commercial, and existing homes in the area. Ifeel it
will be a detriment to property values, and possible high density problems.
Sincerely,
(signed){~ -
Address
To Whom ]~ May Concera,
( prin~ namO
zone ~h~ ~ for ~, 1~1 & 1303 Old Hi~y 10 W~
It ~ ~t ~ to ~ c~t'~e~ of ~ ~ ~g o~
To W'hom It May Concern.
/ print name)
zone change request for address, 122 ! & 1303 Old Highway 10 West.
It does not conli)rm to the current makeup of the m'ea consisting of
agriculture, highway commercial, and existing homes in the area. Ifeel it
will be a detriment to property values, and possible high density problems.
(s~d)
Address
To Whom It May Concern.
i, ,~Tr_.~JQ/~%E.. [ /'~l'/~/_~ am opposed to the
( print name!
zone change request for address, 1221 & 1303 Old Highway 10 West.
It does not conl-brm to the current makeup of the area consisting of
agricultnre, highway commercial, and existing homes in the area. Ifeel it
will be a detriment to property valnes, and possible high density problems.
Sincerely.
(signed)
Address
City of Laurel
P.O. Box 10
Laurel, Montana 59044
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
1) Name of Subdivision:Cherry Hills Subdivision, Third Filing
2) Location: a) General Description Tract 1, C/S 3034
3)
Subdivider:
Address:
Telephone:
b)
General Location Maryland Lane and Betty Avenue
Gerald A. Neumann and Ardis M. Neumann
2609 Selvig Lane; Billings, MT 59102
406/652-3301
4)
Agent:
Address:
Telephone:
5) Description Data:
Engineering, Inc.
1300 North Transtech Way; Billings, MT 59102
406/656-5255
6)
a. Gross area of subdivision in acres: 5.45
b. Number of lots: 17
c. Minimum and maximum lot sizes: 8,445 SF rain; 13,313 SF max
d. Lineal feet of streets: 1,056
e. Existing land use: Vacant
f. Existing zoning: Residential Tracts/R-7500
g. Intended use or purpose: Residential Development
Park requirement payment:
a. Land N/A acres or b. Cash (to be determined) dollars
7)
8)
9) Engineer: Engineering, Inc.
Address:
Telephone:
Variances requested from terms of the Subdivision Regulations: N/A
List of materials submitted with this application: Preliminary Plat (24 copies), SIA, Waiver,
Exhibits A, B, & C (24 copies), and
Application Fee of $500.00, Findings of Fact
(24 copies)
1300 North Transtech Way; Billings, MT 59102
406/656-5255
10) Attorney:
Address:
Telephone:
I declar~ that I~tr~ the owner of record and have examined all statements and information contained herein,
and a ttac xhibits and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true and correct
Owner
Own er
P:D415B_Oheny_Hills_ Pra_PlaLApp
(08/2B/05) jnp/dml