HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Workshop Minutes 06.25.2002 COUNCIL WORK SESSION
BUDGET PRESENTATIONS BY DEPARTMENT HEADS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JUNE 25, 2002
PRESENT: Mayor Bud Johnson
Aldermen: Lauren Van Roekel Ken Olson,
Gay Easton Dan Mears
Doug Poehls Mark Mace
Daniel Dart John Oakes
Staff: Steve Klotz Jan Faught
Cai Cumin
Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Public Works Department
Steve Klotz used the projector to present a General Fund Overview of the Public Works
Department. The Public Works budget divisions that are supported by the General Fund include:
General Fund Building; Fire Inspections; Building Department; Public Works Director; City
Shop; Cemetery; and Parks.
The budgeted dollars in the General Fund Building have decreased each of the last three fiscal
years. However, there have been cost increases in personnel, utility services, telephone, garbage,
building maintenance, janitorial service, building and liability insurance. The Building
Maintenance needs include ADA compliance, electrical concerns ($8,000 cost to bring up to
date), heating, ventilation and air conditioning issues, additional parking needs, space facilities
studies, and structural failures.
The Fire Inspections budget dollars have also decreased in the previous three years. Costs are
increasing in: personnel; operation; fuel costs; maps and codes; memberships, dues, and
certifications', travel and training; and insurance. Since operational costs are barely covered by
the budgeted dollars, no extra money is available for other progressive projects. The Fire
Inspections needs include travel and training in order to stay up to date with the changes. As a
result of the new direction with the Public Works and Public Utilities Departments, the Fire
Inspections budget may be deleted and absorbed by the Building Department. The building fees
are still set by the 1985 schedule. The method of assigning fees has changed in the New
International Codes. With the new method, overhead is assessed and the fee is billed out using a
complex formula. The New International Code states that the fees are assigned by jurisdiction.
The Building Department budget increased from 1999-2000 to 2000-2001 because a vehicle and
some survey equipment were purchased. However, the budget decreased in the 2001-2002 fiscal
year. The cost increases in the Building Department include: personnel; operation; fuel; maps
and codes; maps and codes; memberships, dues, and certifications; travel and training; insurance;
and accounting and auditing. The Building Department needs include travel and training,
equipment, updating codes, and software. The Building Department covers code enforcement of
Council Work Session - Budget Presentations by Depamnent Heads - June 25, 2002
the Laurel Municipal Code and fire code and building codes. Software is available to organize
the information, to provide a database for record keeping, and to provide public accountability
more efficiently.
The Public Works Director budget has also dropped, but costs have increased. The cost
increases include: personnel; operation; fuel; maps and codes; memberships, dues and
certifications; travel and gaining; insurance; consultant services; grant writer; and office
equipment.
The City Shop budget has remained at a relatively steady, but low level. Cost increases include:
personnel; operation; fuel; clothing and uniforms; utilities; garbage; and insurance. The major
City Shop need is the building maintenance. The major building problems are drainages, roofs,
the structure, doors, and heating. The building problems hamper efficiency at the shop. The
trucks need extra idling time on cold days; manpower is necessary for storing things outside; the
shop is not set up fight for the mechanic; and the plumbing needs to be updated.
The Cemetery budget decreased from $176,226 in 1999-2000 to $69,511 in 2000-2001. The
bare bones budget was at $67,381 in 2001-2002. The Cemetexy cost increases include:
personnel; clothing and uniforms; fuel; utilities; tree care; insurance; vehicles; and operation.
The Cemetery needs include tree care, maintenance equipment, an irrigation system, curb and
gutters, and street repair. Steve stated that it is difficult to have a presentable cemetery without
the necessary funds. Work at the cemetery is done without new mowers and without an
irrigation system. The streets in the cemetery are in great need of repair.
There was discussion regarding whether the proposed budgets include the needs of each
department. Mayor Johnson explained that a number of departments presented budgets that had
to be pared back in order to provide a budget in which revenues and appropriations would
balance without dipping into reserves.
The 2001-2002 Parks budget was $145,862, compared to $239,130 in 2000-2001 and $281,130
in 1999-2000. The Parks cost increases include: personnel; clothing and uniforms; fuel;
utilities; garbage; gravel and sand; building maintenance; tree care; park development; insurance;
vehicles; operation; pool chemicals; and professional services. The lack of revenue affects the
park needs of lawn maintenance equipment, irrigation systems, playground equipment, pool
equipment, parking lot construction, landscaping, professional services, restrooms, and curb and
gutter.
Ken Olson asked how park maintenance districts are funded. Cal explained that a park
maintenance district could be established within a defined area where a majority of the property
owners willingly participate. The district would be established with the county clerk and
recorder or the city, and the districts could be assessed by square or front footage. The dollars
would be spent on park maintenance and those expenses would be taken out of the General Fund.
Creating a park maintenance district would be a step in the tight direction to provide more
funding for the parks. If the district were created by subdivision, the dollars would have to be
spent within that specific subdivision.
2
Council Work Session - Budget Presentations by Depamnent Heads - June 25, 2002
There was further discussion regarding the needs of the city parks. Ken had information
regarding creating a park maintenance district. Cal proposed a citywide park maintenance
district and suggested providing a list of expenditures and documentation to promote it.
Ken explained that the funds from a park maintenance district would free up funds in the General
Fund. Mayor Johnson stated that ongoing discussion is necessary to find ways to bring in more
revenue to address the needs.
Delaying the needs of each of the budget divisions of the Public Works Department results in
higher replacement costs and higher levels of depreciation.
The Public Works Department General Fund Revenue Overview showed that revenue is
decreasing while operational costs continue to increase. Further accumulation of deficit and
decay result each year that solutions to the needs are delayed.
There was a lengthy discussion regarding the needs of the parks and the need for community and
voter support in order to fulfill the needs.
Laurel Volunteer Ambulance
Jan Faught gave a Power Point presentation regarding the ambulance budget. Jan stated that the
ambulance service has the ability to make money and to cover expenses. City rates have been
increased and county rates have been created. The ambulance service is now accepting
assignment from Medicare, which should bring in more money to accounts that were not paid in
the past. Revenues should rise as attendants become more qualified and more hours are covered.
Expenses for medical and office supplies and fuel and oil were raised to cover generalized
increases from manufacturers:
New ambulance attendants must receive the Hepatitis B Series, and TB tests need to be renewed
yearly. The cost of a Hepatitis B shot is $77.00, for a total of $231.00 for the series. The series
needs to be completed every ten years. Jan requested a new budget item to cover the cost of the
series for three new attendants each year. The TB test costs $20.00 each. The total expense for
the immunizations would be $1,455.
Ambulance attendants must recertify every two years with the state and the National Registry
Group. The requirements consist of 48 hours of continuing education and 24 credit hours of
refresher courses. The majority of the hours are completed by traveling to out-of-town
symposiums, seminars, and conferences. Ten crewmembers must recertify by March 3 l, 2003.
Two crewmembers, which are qualified as training coordinators, give the refresher class to the
crew at no charge to the city. Jan stated that it would be possible to do more classes if the
ambulance service had more room available.
Vehicle maintenance has been a large expense this year. The light bar, the air bags, and the left
rear view mirror on Care 2 need to be replaced at an estimated total cost of $1,400.
3
Council Work Session - Budget Presentations by Department Heads - June 25, 2002
The ambulance crewmembers are volunteers. The goal of the ambulance service is to provide
coverage twenty-four hours a day for seven days a week with a trained crew to answer every call.
At the present time, the crew has extra attendants and two calls have been answered at the same
time. The goal has been exceeded, and Jan stated that the crew's experience is an asset to the
city. Jan explained the current and proposed graduated payroll budget, a copy of which is
attached to these minutes. Crewmembers often respond to calls to assist the on-call attendants.
lan requested that the training officer and the vehicle maintenance officer receive $600/year
compensation for their work.
The future needs of the ambulance service include a replacement program for the vehicles, a
repeater station to provide better communications, and an upgrade from Basic Life Support
(BLS) service to Advanced Life Support (ALS) service.
Some immediate needs for the ambulance service include proper office space for the director and
attendants, a dedicated training room, a bathroom with a shower and laundry facilities, and
adequate storage space. The problem caused by ice and snow build up by the door needs to be
corrected in order to provide a safe entry for the attendants. During the winter, the ice and snow
build up makes it difficult to maneuver the ambulance in and out of the bay. Jan suggested that a
solution to the problem would be to build out the bay and provide some extra room and to take
care of the build up and create a dedicated drain o~.. Jan distributed drawings of suggested
solutions to the space problem and a proposal for a structure on the lot located at 1~ Avenue and
1~t Street.
Jan stated that the present ambulance crew is doing a great job, and she requested any help
available from the city to keep the attendants certified and willing to work.
CiW-CounW Planning Board
Cal Cumin distributed a CIP Rating Criteria Worksheet for Community Planning and reviewed it
for the Council.
The last legislature passed a new requirement that every local government would develop and
adopt a growth management plan, which is another name for a comprehensive plan. In order to
enforce subdivision and zoning laws, the city's growth management plan must be referenced.
That was due to go into effect on October 1, 2001. Laurel does not have this done, so it is one of
the problems we face. The Growth Management Plan requires data, plans, maps, and analysis
for land use, housing, public facilities, population and socio-economics, natural resources,
transportation, intergovernmental cooperation, implementation strategies, and provision for
keeping such information current. We do not have those requirements and do not have any
current information. Our comprehensive plan is old, and now we are under a mandate from the
legislature. A lot of work will be required on this.
As part of our planning effort, Cal said that the city needed to work with economic development,
which is the key to making a community work. Most people agree on this but disagree on how it
is to be done most successfully. We need to make a major effort on supporting existing
4
Council Work Session - Budget Presentations by Department Heads - June 25, 2002
businesses and attracting new industry without destroying what is attractive about Laurel as a
place to live and work and without depleting our children's future resources.
Economic development activities the City needs to be involved with include the following:
developing incentives for doing business in Laurel; establishing baselines and methods of
assessing impact of economic development activities; developing public/private partnership (i.e.,
water sports park); supporting development of a Business Improvement District downtown;
creating a private development corporation; coordinating and working with the Laurel
Revitalization League (LRL); working with Big Sky Economic Development Authority, the
Beartooth RC&D, the railroad, the Department of Agriculture, the State Department of
Commerce, Certified Communities, etc.; adopting the streetscape program, and supporting
development of an Airport Industrial Park. With the LRL, we have a core group of local
businesses actively promoting downtown, but it needs encouragement, assistance, and
cooperation from the City government.
The Entryway Zoning District is being considered by the council and is a major step forward for
the City. The draf~ Planned Unit Development/Smart Growth Ordinance is a major revision to
regulations as to how Laurel will grow. Revisions are also needed to the Subdivision Ordinance
to implement many of the things that have come out of the TCSP Oversight Committee program.
The Bike Path Plan and coordination with the Billings area is a big item because it may have to
be done by a consultant. There is a lot of interest in the City of Laurel for developing more
walking paths and bike paths. There is an extensive bikeway system in Billings that we can
coordinate with and organizations like the Yellowstone River Parks Association and Bike Net
that would like to extend trails along the river. There is also the potential for US 212 to have a
bike path and for us to capitalize on the use of that route for biking.
The North First Avenue Planning District grew out of the Ricci's zone change several years ago.
The work needs to be done in anticipation of the State Highway Department improving Buffalo
Trail and the impact of that on the community's north residential neighborhood character.
We need to be proactive in funding this program. We have a vision of where we want to go and
how we want our community to be. Nobody else is going to do it for us. This is not a cost but
an investment, and it is up to all of us to make it work.
Planning and economic development budgets will increase as required activities and growth and
change occur. If the investment in both is not beneficial to the community, the effort can be
reduced to a status quo, non-proactive level.
Cai has done consulting work for Laurel for over twenty years. Cal asked the City of Billings
how much it would cost the City of Laurel to have planning administered in the City of Billings.
The figure was $71,000. He has done the services for Laurel at a much lower fee than he should
have. Cai stated that the City of Laurel needs a planner or more money needs to be invested in
planning services. The only thing that would help is to combine it with an economic
development office and get the Laurel Revitalization League and the downtown business people
Council Work Session - Budget Presentations by Department Heads - June 25, 2002
to finance part of that through a Business Improvement District. Cai stated that the LRL needs
encouragement and help to find the resources available to the organization.
Cai distributed copies of the proposed City-County Planning Budget. The only change is the
$15,000 for the Growth Management Plan. Two large subdivisions are being considered for
approval, and a zone change at the comer of Yard Office Road and Airport Road will be
contentious.
Cal also distributed a sheet of projected revenues, and stated that there is not enough revenue to
go around. Cal stated that the city needed to consider increasing the planning budget. If it were
necessary to replace him, it would cost a considerable larger amount.
There was further discussion regarding the Growth Management Plan.
Mayor Johnson distributed the minutes fi.om the previous budget presentation.
The draf~ council agenda for July 2, 2002, was discussed. The public hearing on the intent to
vacate the public right of way (west of 12th Avenue between 9~h Street and Maryland Lane) is on
the agenda. If the resolution to vacate were approved by the council, a price would be set for the
sale of the property to the petitioner.
Mayor Johnson has been working with the Laurel Outlook to find a way to distribute our printed
material. He received cost figures for an insert similar to The City Link, which is the insert that
the City of Billings places in the Billings Gazette. Layout, printing, and distribution of a color
insert would cost about $680. July 12t~ is the deadline to submit information for the insert. The
insert will be in the July 24th Laurel Outlook issue and about 3,500 copies will be printed. This
will provide communication with the residents of the City of Laurel between two and four times
each year.
MMIA is scheduled to meet with the Public Works Committee on July 8th. On July 9th, MMIA
will present liability education to staff members in the afternoon and to the council at the evening
workshop.
Mayor Johnson thanked Steve, Jan, and Cal for their presentations.
Respectfully submitted,
Cindy Allen
Council Secretary
6