Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Workshop Packet 09.02.2025 AGENDA CITY OF LAUREL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 02, 2025 6:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Public Input: Citizens may address the Council regarding any item of City business that is not on tonight’s agenda. The duration for an individual speaking under Public Input is limited to three minutes. While all comments are welcome, the Council will not take action on any item not on the agenda. Because of the Rules that govern public meetings, Council is not permitted to speak in response to any issue raised that is a non-Agenda item. The Mayor may provide factual information in response, with the intention that the matter may be addressed at a later meeting. In addition, City Council may request that a particular non-Agenda item be placed on an upcoming Agenda, for consideration. Citizens should not construe Council’s “silence” on an issue as an opinion, one way or the other, regarding that non-Agenda matter. Council simply cannot debate an item that is not on the Agenda, and therefore, they must simply listen to the feedback given during public input. If a citizen would like to speak or comment regarding an item that is on tonight’s agenda, we ask that you wait until the agenda item is presented to the Council by the Mayor and the public is asked to comment by the Mayor. Be advised, if a discussion item has an upcoming public hearing, we would request members of the public to reserve your comments until the public hearing. At the public hearing, the City Council will establish an official record that will include all of your comments, testimony, and written evidence. General Items 1. Appointment of Jon Rutt to the Tree/Park Board. 2. Appointments of Cody Olvera, Keith Guy, Justin Lackore, and Jarit Fitchener to the Laurel Volunteer Fire Department. 3. Appointment of Kay Wilcox to the Library Board for a five-year term ending June 30, 2030. 4. Planning: Zone Change from R-6000 to RMF Ironhorse Subdivision. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) Executive Review 5. Planning: Resolution - Resolution Of The City Council To Approve A Conditional Use Permit For The Owl Café To Allow On-Site Sale And Consumption Of Alcohol At 203 East Main, Laurel, Montana. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 6. Planning: Resolution - Resolution Of Intent Of The City Council To Annex The Property Legally Described As Parcel 1a Of Certificate Of Survey 3034, Amended (24), Being The Proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing, Adjacent To The City Of Laurel, As An Addition To The City Of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana, With Concurrent Approval Of Zoning Designation Upon Annexation Of The Property. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 7. Planning: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Approving The Variance Requested By Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores To Allow Signage Exceeding The Height Limitations Of The Highway Commercial Zoning District. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 8. Planning: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Approving A Conditional Use Permit For Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, Based Upon The Recommendation Of The Laurel Zoning Commission. 9. Public Works: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Authorizing The Mayor To Execute An Independent Contractor Service Contract With True North Contracting. Council Issues 1 Other Items Attendance at Upcoming Council Meeting Announcements The City makes reasonable accommodations for any known disability that may interfere with a person’s ability to participate in this meeting. Persons needing accommodation must notify the City Clerk’s Of fice to make needed arrangements. To make your request known, please call 406-628-7431, Ext. 5100, or write to City Clerk, PO Box 10, Laurel, MT 59044, or present your request at City Hall, 115 West First Street, Laurel, Montana. 2 File Attachments for Item: 1. Appointment of Jon Rutt to the Tree/Park Board. 3 4 File Attachments for Item: 2. Appointments of Cody Olvera, Keith Guy, Justin Lackore, and Jarit Fitchener to the Laurel Volunteer Fire Department.  5 LAUREL FIRE DEPARTMENT 215 West 1st Street • Laurel, Mt •59044•Office 406.628.4911 • Fax 406.628.2185 8/20/2025 Brittney, Please move forward with putting the following elected fire fighters in front of the Mayor and City Council.  Cody Olvera  Keith Guy  Justin Lackore  Jarit Fitchener Thanks, JW Hopper Fire Chief Laurel Volunteer Fire Department (O) 406-628-4911 (C) 406-860-0782 jwhopper@laurel.mt.gov 6 File Attachments for Item: 3. Appointment of Kay Wilcox to the Library Board for a five-year term ending June 30, 2030. 7 August 13, 2025 To whom it may concern, I am interested in the Trustee position at the Laurel Public Library. I have 22 years as a Para-Educator, working in different schools, with children ages from kindergarten through the 12th grade. I also have experience working in the library from being employed at these schools. It is important to me that the Laurel Library is always up to date in all aspects of technology. And available to everyone. Thank you, Kay Wilcox 406-660-7239 8 File Attachments for Item: 4. Planning: Zone Change from R-6000 to RMF Ironhorse Subdivision. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 9 1 CITY HALL 115 W. 1ST ST. PLANNING: 628-4796 WATER OFC.: 628-7431 COURT: 628-1964 FAX 628-2241 City Of Laurel P.O. Box 10 Laurel, Montana 59044 Office of the City Planner ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ZC-25-01 Marvin Brown - Iron Horse Station Subdivision Zone Change Request August 27, 2025 R-6000 to RMF BACKGROUND: The City of Laurel is an incorporated City within the State of Montana with powers established under the Constitution of Montana XI.4. The power and processes for the Cit y to establish zoning regulations are found in §76-2-301 et. seq. M.C.A. Mr. Brown was the original developer for the Iron Horse Station Subdivision. The original intent was to create a mixture of lots and lot sizes that would accommodate a wide array of housing opportunities with the primary focus being on one- and two-family dwellings. Over time, the perceived demand for new lots within the City of Laurel have changed in the opinion of the owner but it is important to remember that just because the property is zoned multi-family that a purchaser of any given lot may construct a single family residence. Our charge is to consider the rational nexus for the adoption of zoning in the City of Laurel. The application materials address several other points that outline the anticipated benefits of the project. The application materials are incorporated into this report by reference. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Block 6, Lots 1 and 2, Block 7 Iron Horse Station Subdivision located in Section 9, Township 24 East, Range 2 South, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. In general, the properties front along Great Northern Road. APPLICANT(S): Marvin Brown – Iron Horse LLC PO Box 80661 Billings MT 59108 10 2 EXISTING CONDITION: The subject property is a platted residential subdivision. The property is served by public water, sewer, streets, solid waste, is surrounded by RMF and CC Zoning Designations, and is greater than 2.07 acres in size. PROCESS:  The application for a Zoning Map Amendment (Zone Change) was submitted on June 30, 2025, and is scheduled for a public hearing on August 20, 2025 by the Laurel Zoning Commission.  The Zoning Commission following the Public Hearing may not make changes to or conditional modifications to the zoning and map. The change may only be recommended for approval or denial. In either case, the decision must be supported by findings of fact and conclusions related to the rational nexus for the adoption of zoning or zoning amendments.  Those findings of fact and conclusions as well as the record minutes of the public hearing will be submitted to the City Council for consideration, hearing and final decision.  The City Council will conduct a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Zoning Commission recommendation and an Ordinance of the City Council on First Reading. o Should the Zoning Commission recommendation be denial and it is upheld by the City Council on First Reading, the request is deemed denied. o Should the Zoning Commission recommendation for approval pass on First Reading, another public hearing and Second Reading and adoption will be scheduled.  If passed on Second Reading, the new zoning map assignment would become effective 30 - days post Second Reading. ZONES INVOLVED: Existing and Proposed  R-6000 - Residential 6000 District. o The residential-6000 zone is intended to promote an area for a high, urban-density, duplex residential environment on lots that are usually served by a public water and sewer system.  RMF – Residential Multifamily District. o The residential multifamily zone is intended to provide a suitable residential environment for medium to high density residential dwellings; and to establish, where possible, a buffer between residential and commercial zones.  CC – Community Commercial District. o The community commercial classification is primarily to accommodate community retail, service, and office facilities offering a greater variety than would normally be found in a neighborhood or convenience retail development. Facilities within the classification will generally serve an area within a one-and-one-half-mile radius and are commensurate with the purchasing power and needs of the present and potential population within the trade area. It is intended that these business facilities 11 3 be provided in business corridors or islands rather than a strip development along arterials. RATIONAL BASIS OF ZONING: In the State of Montana, all jurisdictions proposing to zone or rezone property or to adopt or revise their zoning regulations must issue findings of fact on a twelve-point test that constitute the rational nexus/legal basis for the adoption of a zoning district, zoning regulations, or changes to zoning or zoning regulations. This rational nexus is called the “Lowe Test”. I. Is the zoning in accordance with the growth policy; Findings of Fact:  Both the RMF and R-6000 are generally applicable, City Established, zoning districts.  The requested zoning is based in the Growth Policy. A simple look at the Growth Policy and future land use map will verify that the requested zone assignment is consistent with the text and mapping components of the Growth Policy.  The Growth Policy, Future Land Use Map, designates the property as Residential. The Residential designation supports zoning assignment from R-7500 to RMF.  The RMF designation is typically reserved for areas of proposed development, redevelopment or in areas where adaptive reuse of existing structures that are associated with significant land ownership is contemplated.  Both the R-6000 and RMF have provisions for the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed development could be proposed in the R-6000 via the PUD process.  The requested zoning accomplishes several residential neighborhood goals and strategies are implemented. Diversity of Neighborhoods, historic to modern; accommodation of a diverse population both age and economic condition; Creation of zones where expansion of non-motorized routes and access to the core of the community. Residential districts protected from excessive noise and commercial impacts and the conversion of structures to new uses is encouraged. Conclusion: The requested zoning is in accordance with the Growth Policy and other adopted rules and regulations of the City of Laurel. II. Is the zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets; Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning encourages compact walkable development as well as expanded opportunities for new uses.  The property is located within reasonable walking distance of the Central Business District and adjacent to Community Commercial. As such, the residents would be able to walk or bicycle to essential services which would by default reduce the vehicular traffic on the streets.  The proposed zoning encourages compact urban development as such the need for vehicular travel is limited. 12 4  The property is located where all the necessary public infrastructure exists.  The proposed zoning in conjunction with the development standards adopted with the Subdivision Regulations will provide for flow through development, logical extension of the gridded infrastructure network, and encourage pedestrian- friendly growth. Conclusion: The requested zone should lessen congestion in the streets by ensuring orderly growth and development of the property that is consistent with the proposed zoning and other regulations adopted by the City of Laurel. III. Is the zoning designed to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning will provide for consistency in development along with provision of police and fire protection.  The proposed zoning incorporates enforcement of development standards, setbacks and compliance with the other development standards adopted by the City of Laurel.  In addition to the zoning, the City of Laurel enforces the International Building Codes. The combination of regulations are life safety driven.  The proposed zoning has restrictions on lot coverage, grading and development on steep slopes and other areas that are potentially hazardous. The difference between R-6000 and RMF is minimal. Conclusion: The requested zoning along with other regulatory standards should provide safety for residents and visitors to the city from fire, panic and other dangers. IV. Is the zoning designed to promote health and the general welfare; Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning imposes setbacks, height limits and building restrictions.  The proposed zoning groups together like and consistent uses within existing neighborhoods.  The overall development standards of the RMF do not convey a significant benefit to the subject property that is not available in the R-6000.  In addition to the zoning, the City of Laurel enforces the International Building Codes. The combination of regulations are life safety driven.  The RMF and R-6000 are compatible residential districts. In fact, the RMF and R-6000 are adjacent to one another in multiple examples within the City of Laurel.  The current zoning regulations restrict development in hazardous areas. Conclusion: The grouping together of like and consistent uses promotes the health and general welfare of all citizens of the City of Laurel. Further, the requested zoning is substantially consistent with the land use in the surrounding neighborhoods. 13 5 V. Is the zoning designed to provide adequate light and air; Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning imposes building setbacks, height limits, limits on the number of buildings on a single parcel, and reasonable area limits on new development.  The only difference between the existing and proposed zoning is the building height limit and lot coverage.  The issue of lot coverage was diminished, in part, by the passage of legislation in the 2023 session.  The proposed zoning implements the concept that the City of Laurel was developed historically on a gridded network. Both the existing and proposed zoning requires the perpetuation of this pattern. In doing so as the City plans for growth, the spacing and layout of new development will facilitate provision of light and air to new development. Conclusion: The proposed zoning ensures the provision of adequate light and air to residents of the City through a continuation of the dimensional standards and other development limitations. VI. Is the zoning designed to prevent the overcrowding of land; Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning imposes minimum lot size, use regulations and other limitations on development.  The amenities and parking associated with the proposed zoning can be contained within the subject property.  The RMF is a generally applicable zoning district within the City of Laurel with a minimum district size of 2.07 acres.  The area involved in the proposed rezoning is in excess of 2.07 acres. Conclusion: The existing development standards of the requested zoning prevents overcrowding of land. VII. Is the zoning designed to avoid undue concentration of population; Findings of Fact:  The requested zoning is one of the generally applicable Laurel residential districts that represents a holistic approach to land use regulation for the entirety of the City of Laurel and is not focused on any single special interest.  The overall maximum development densities are substantially similar between the R -600 and RMF.  The requested zoning is one of four residential zoning districts that provide a continuum of residential densities and manage development to create land use compatibility.  The requested zoning imposes minimum lot sizes, maximum number of residences on a single parcel and setback standards.  The RMF is a generally applicable zoning district within the Cit y of Laurel with a minimum district size of 2.07 acres. 14 6  The area involved in the proposed rezoning is in excess of 2.07 acres. Conclusion: The proposed zoning prevent the undue concentration of population by encouraging the most appropriate use and residential density at any given location within the jurisdiction. VIII. Is the zoning designed to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; Findings of Fact:  The requested zoning establishes minimum standards for the provision of infrastructure such as roads, sidewalks, water sewer, wire utilities and storm water management.  The requested zoning encourages compact urban scale development and groups together similar uses that will not detract from the quality of life expected in Laurel while providing the economies of scale to extend water, sewer, streets, parks, quality schools and other public requirements.  The property for the requested zoning is served by City streets, water and wastewater systems.  The parent subdivision provided parkland as provided by the Laurel Subdivision Regulations and the city has numerous developed parks and recreational opportunities. Conclusion: The area affected by the requested zoning is served by insure the adequate transportation, water, sewerage, school, parks, and other public requirements. IX. Does the zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses; Findings of Fact:  The RMF is a generally applicable zoning district within the City of Laurel with a minimum district size of 2.07 acres.  The area involved in the proposed rezoning is in excess of 2.07 acres. The property abuts additional RMF zoning designations.  The uses and development patterns between R-6000 and RMF are subtle. It is for this reason that the Growth Policy supports a wide range of residential zoning designations within the City.  The requested zoning is one of the generally applicable Laurel residential districts that represents a holistic approach to land use regulation for the entirety of the City of Laurel and is not focused on any single special interest.  The overall development standards of the RMF do not convey a significant benefit to the subject property that is not available in the R-6000.  The RMF and R-6000 are compatible residential districts. In fact, the RMF and R-6000 are adjacent to one another in multiple examples within the City of Laurel. Conclusion: The requested zoning gives due consideration to the character of the existing neighborhoods within the city as well as suitability for the particular uses. 15 7 X. Does the zoning give reasonable consideration to the peculiar suitability of the property for its particular uses; Findings of Fact:  The RMF is a generally applicable zoning district within the City of Laurel.  The requested zoning is one of the generally applicable Laurel residential districts that represents a holistic approach to land use regulation for the entirety of the City of Laurel and is not focused on any single special interest.  The overall maximum development densities are substantially similar between the R -600 and RMF.  The overall development standards of the RMF do not convey a significant benefit to the subject property that is not available in the R-6000.  The RMF and R-6000 are compatible residential districts. In fact, the RMF and R-6000 are adjacent to one another in multiple examples within the City of Laurel.  Both the R-6000 and RMF have provisions for the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed development could be proposed in the R-6000 via the PUD process.  The requested zoning accomplishes several residential neighborhood goals and strategies are implemented. Diversity of Neighborhoods, historic to modern; accommodation of a diverse population both age and economic condition; Creation of zones where expansion of non-motorized routes and access to the core of the community. Residential districts protected from excessive noise and commercial impacts and the conversion of structures to new uses is encouraged. Conclusion: The requested zone gives reasonable consideration to the peculiar suitability of the property for its particular uses. XI. Will the zoning conserve the value of buildings; Findings of Fact:  The requested zone groups together like and consistent uses and is consistent with the existing zoning in the various neighborhoods of the City of Laurel.  The RMF and R-6000 are compatible residential districts. In fact, the RMF and R-6000 are adjacent to one another in multiple examples within the City of Laurel.  Both the R-6000 and RMF have provisions for the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed development could be proposed in the R-6000 via the PUD process.  The requested zoning accomplishes several residential neighborhood goals and strategies are implemented. Diversity of Neighborhoods, historic to modern; accommodation of a diverse population both age and economic condition; Creation of zones where expansion of non-motorized routes and access to the core of the community. Residential districts protected from excessive noise and commercial impacts and the conversion of structures to new uses is encouraged.  The proposed zoning reinforces that residential buildings will continue to be used for equal or greater potential residential purposes. Conclusion: The requested zoning will conserve or in many cases enhance the value of buildings. 16 8 XII. Will the zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality? Findings of Fact:  The proposed zoning and zoning map provide for transitional areas between uses that may be incompatible.  The requested zoning expands an existing mixed-use residential district that is specifically intended to ease the transition between residential and commercial uses.  The requested zoning is consistent with the type of development that exists and is occurring in the surrounding neighborhood.  Providing a healthy mix of residential properties is in the best interest of the city, property owners and potential buyers.  The requested zoning accomplishes several residential neighborhood goals and strategies are implemented. Diversity of Neighborhoods, historic to modern; accommodation of a diverse population both age and economic condition; Creation of zones where expansion of non-motorized routes and access to the core of the community. Residential districts protected from excessive noise and commercial impacts and the conversion of structures to new uses is encouraged.  RMF is and has been assigned adjacent to both the R-7500 and R-6000 zoning assignments. With all but one of the current assignments being adjacent to R-6000. Conclusion: The requested zoning should encourage the most appropriate use of land not only in the neighborhood but throughout the City of Laurel. OTHER NOTABLE FACTORS:  The mandates associated with SB 382 and other legislation passed during the 2023 Legislative Session requiring communities with greater than 5,000 population to increase opportunities and options for housing within the community. RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Commission finds that the requested zoning is INCONSISTENT with the Laurel- Yellowstone Growth Policy; that the rational nexus for the adoption of zoning is not met, due to expressed concerns with traffic, lack of adequate infrastructure to support the increased density, and that the citizens of Laurel have participated in the creation of the proposed rezoning process. Further, that the Zoning Commission recommend that the City Council DENY the Zoning Classification of RMF on all of Block 6, Lots 1 and 2, Block 7 Iron Horse Station Subdivision located in Section 9, Township 24 East, Range 2 South, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana (on a 4-3 vote). 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 File Attachments for Item: 5. Planning: Resolution - Resolution Of The City Council To Approve A Conditional Use Permit For The Owl Café To Allow On-Site Sale And Consumption Of Alcohol At 203 East Main, Laurel, Montana. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 55 R25-____ Approve Owl Café Conditional Use Permit RESOLUTION NO. R25-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OWL CAFÉ TO ALLOW ON-SITE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL AT 203 EAST MAIN, LAUREL, MONTANA. WHEREAS, on June 27, 2025, Shelly Van Atta submitted a Special Review Application on behalf of property owner Jodi Roberg, requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-site sale and consumption of alcohol at the Owl Café, located at 203 East Main, legally described as Laurel Realty Subdivision, Block 2, Lots 7, 8, and 9, Section 09, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana; WHEREAS, pursuant to Laurel Municipal Code §17.68.040, the Zoning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, evaluated the request against the applicable standards of review, and considered the effect of the proposed use on surrounding land use, city services, and the Laurel Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was properly advertised and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the subject property in accordance with law; WHEREAS, on August 20, 2025, after considering public comment, the Zoning Commission voted 5–2 to recommend that the City Council approve the requested Conditional Use Permit, finding that the application meets or exceeds all required standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed use is consistent with the objectives of Title 17 of the Laurel Municipal Code, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, as follows: 1. Approval. The Conditional Use Permit for the Owl Café at 203 East Main, Laurel, Montana, to allow on-site sale and consumption of alcohol, is hereby approved. 2. Conditions. The use shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Laurel Municipal Code and any other requirements imposed by the State of Montana regarding alcohol sales and consumption. The City Council may impose additional conditions if necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of August, 2025, by Council Member ________________. 56 R25-____ Approve Owl Café Conditional Use Permit PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the _____ day of August, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor the _____ day of August, 2025. CITY OF LAUREL ___________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney 57 CITY HALL 115 W. 1ST ST. PUB. WORKS: 628-4796 WATER OFC.: 628-7431 COURT: 628-1964 FAX 628-2241 City Of Laurel P.O. Box 10 Laurel, Montana 59044 Office of the Director of Public Works Zoning Commission Recommendation CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT CUP-25-02 Owl Café – On Premise Alcohol Sales and Consumption August 25, 2025 INTRODUCTION On Friday, June 27, 2025, Shelly Van Atta submitted a Special Review Application for onsite sales and consumption of alcohol within the Laurel Central Business Zoning District (CBZD). The property involved in the request is the Owl Café owned by Jodi Roberg, 203 East Main, and is described as Laurel Realty Subdivision, Block 2 Lots 7, 8, and 9, Section 09, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. The project will be presented to the Laurel – Yellowstone City County Planning Board on August 20, 2025, with a recommendation to the Laurel City Council for final decision in late September. PLANNER RESPONSIBILITY A. Consult with other departments of the City or County to evaluate the impact of the special review upon public facilities and services; ACCOMPLISHED B. Study each application with reference to it appropriateness and effect on existing and proposed land use, and reference to the comprehensive plan; ACCOMPLISHED C. Advertise twice in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdictional area of the Laurel – Yellowstone City County Planning Board; ACCOMPLISHED D. Notify by mail, the applicant or his agent at least five days prior to the date of the public hearing of the date, time and place of such hearing; ACCOMPLISHED E. Notify, by mail, all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property subject to the special review of the date, time and location of the public hearing; ACCOMPLISHED F. After the public hearing and as part of the public record, report findings and conclusions and recommendations to the Zoning Commission. ACCOMPLISHED 58 STANDARD OF REVIEW Zoning Commission/City Council  The request complies with the requirements of §17.68.040 of the City of Laurel Zoning;  The request is consistent with the objectives and purpose of Title 17 of the Laurel Municipal Code;  The proposed use is compatible with surrounding land use or is otherwise screened and separated from adjacent land in such a way as to minimize adverse effects;  The zoning commission shall consider and may impose modification or conditions concerning, but not limited to: o Street and road capacity, o Ingress and egress to adjoining streets, o Off-street parking, o Fencing, screening and landscaping. o Building bulk and location, o Usable open space, o Signs and lighting, o Noise, vibration, air pollution and similar environmental influences. VARIANCES REQUESTED N/A. None Requested. RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Commission (on a 5-2 Vote) finds that the application, supporting documentation meet or exceeds the Standard of Review and Recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use for the onsite sale and consumption of alcohol at the Owl Café (203 East Main, and is described as Laurel Realty Subdivision, Block 2 Lots 7, 8, and 9, Section 09, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana). 59 60 June 27, 2025 Laurel City Council 115 West First Street Laurel, MT 59044 Dear Friends, In compliance with Laurel Municipal Code 17.68, this letter is a request for a Special Review to approve the Montana Department of Revenue’s application to purchase the Sonny O’Day’s, Inc., All-Alcoholic Beverages License, by the owners of the Owl Café: Jodi Roberg and her family. In order to verify the truthfulness of all facts presented in this letter, we pre-submitted this letter to, and received approval to send it to you by, the Montana Departments of Revenue and Justice. This letter also was approved by the law offices of Crist, Krogh, Alke & Nord, PLLC. In this letter, I will be providing a more extensive explanation than you might be expecting, but I am doing so with the sole intent of eliminating any preconceived ideas in the greater-Laurel community that are based on rumors instead of fact. I want to put to rest any falsehoods that might negatively affect Jodi Roberg and her family; their future purchase of this license; and, their future bar-and-casino operation using this license. The Purchase Application submitted by Jodi Roberg and her family is the only Purchase Application the State of Montana has received and will consider for this license. Because Jodi Roberg and her family, owners of another bar-and casino in Montana, have an existing license that has been in, and remains in, good standing with the State of Montana, their Purchase Application for this license enjoys broad support from the Montana Departments of Revenue and Justice. As you may be aware, this license is historic, being the longest solely-held liquor license in the State of Montana. It has been an integral part of the greater-Laurel community for nearly 80 years. Because this license holds an irreplaceable chapter in Montana and Laurel history, I know well that its loss to the City of Laurel would be immeasurable. That is why, at my great expense, I have worked diligently to keep the license in Laurel. Because of the license’s historical importance, dating back decades, well before Montana established a quota system, I have been told that I may sell my license, without the gambling component, in Billings. The liquor license, alone, sells for more in Billings than I can get for both the liquor and gambling components in Laurel. I have had a number of inquiries from prospective Billings purchasers; however, I am reluctant to sell outside of Laurel because I know what a loss it would be to the City of Laurel, financially and historically. If I can keep the license in Laurel, adding to the city’s tax base, I will. 61 Page Two I understand that the Montana Department of Revenue mistakenly allocated more liquor licenses than their quota system allows within the City of Laurel boundaries, and thus, the state will issue no new liquor licenses for the City of Laurel. This would mean that if I sell my license to a Billings purchaser, Laurel would have one less liquor license on which it may earn lucrative tax revenue; and, more importantly for me, it would be the end of celebrating a nearly 80-year legacy for my beloved father, Sonny O’Day. My father would be extremely unhappy to know how very expensive his license has been for me to operate under the recent concessionnaire in Laurel. It has cost my family and me dearly. I have earned absolutely no revenue—not one single penny of profit—from its use under the recent concessionaire. I have paid, myself, for all the alcohol that was sold by the recent concessionaire, without receiving any of the profit he received: profit that the State of Montana laws require me to receive from the concessionaire. Even after the recent concessionaire was ordered by the State to pay me what I was owed, it never happened. In addition, I paid for insurance, license application-and-transfer fees, state and city fees, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fees, and more, without receiving one single cent in return. This has been a tremendous financial burden, one I will not continue to impose on my family. Taking care of the paperwork, alone, is exhausting at my age. Last fall, I paid thousands of dollars and spent over 100 hours of my time to draft, complete and submit the paperwork by myself, without help, to transfer this license, at the recent concessionaire’s request, to a larger downtown facility that he owned. Much to the State’s and my dismay, the recent concessionaire decided to cancel the license transfer just one week prior to the State’s assurance that the license transfer would be approved. Both the State and I tried hard to talk him into completing the license transfer. The State and I even collaborated on a legal way to force him to comply, but he remained steadfast. His decision was looked on very unfavorably by the State and generated for himself much negative will with the State of Montana, which could have compromised my license and jeopardized any chance he might have hoped for to purchase the license, himself. His decision to stop the license transfer devastated me. It wasted all the time and money I invested in the license-transfer process. It cost my family and me substantially, both financially and emotionally. If the State and I thought the recent concessionaire stopped the transfer for an exigent reason, his decision might have been better tolerated, but we could not discern a cogent reason for his decision. We still are seeking answers, as explained more fully, below. I cannot and will not go through that debilitating process again. This is why my professional advisors and I have asked the Montana Departments of Revenue and Justice, in collaboration with the IRS, to conduct a complete and thorough financial audit and investigation of my license and its use during the period of time it was operating with the recent concessionaire in Laurel; this includes the failed transfer of my license to the recent concessionaire’s new building. Thus far, no bookkeeping or records from the concessionaire of any kind have been provided, as 62 Page Three requested, to the State or to me. We hope that through this audit and investigation, both the State and I will receive answers to questions we long have been asking. My recent experience in my hometown, regarding this license, has not been a fortunate one, and if the rumors I hear are true, my actions have been falsely represented. The State will attest that I went above and beyond, at my sole expense, to make the operation of this license profitable for the recent concessionaire, receiving nothing in return. Regardless of my financial loss, I recently was delighted to learn that history will be playing a positive, recurring role in saving the Sonny O’Day’s license once again. When my father died, in 2001, his dear friends, business neighbor, and owners of the Owl Café came to my family’s rescue and offered to keep the license operating in good faith until we made other arrangements. Without the then-owners of the Owl Cafe, it is conceivable that our family, and the City of Laurel, would have lost this valuable license. Recently, the Owl Cafe’s owners, Jodi Roberg and her family, once again came to the rescue of the Sonny O’Day’s license by offering to purchase it at a generous price that will help my family and me make a profitable return for the financial drain the license has cost us using a concessionnaire. The Owl’s ownership will keep the license operating in Laurel, earning lucrative revenue, much of which will be spent in Laurel, in addition to decades of tax revenue that will be reinvested in the city. Thank God for Jodi Roberg and family! Without them, I have no doubt that this important license will be in Billings before year ’s end. I understand that there are rumors that my license could be purchased by a different Laurel purchaser. Based on the recent handling of my license, the State of Montana will not allow that to happen. The State’s job is to protect this long-held license which, according to Montana law, belongs to the State of Montana, with me as only a temporary holder of that license. It is the State of Montana, not I, that will determine who will purchase this license. The State will allow an all-alcoholic beverage license to be sold only to a purchaser who has submitted a Purchase Application, with the attendant required paperwork, and who is in good standing with the State. The only prospective purchaser to have submitted a Purchase Application and attendant required paperwork is Jodi Roberg and her family. They also are the only prospective purchasers who are in, and remain in, good standing with the State. They currently are owners of another bar and casino that has remained in exemplary standing with the State, and are, therefore, the only purchasers the State will consider. The Sonny O’Day’s license has passed two previous Special Reviews by the Laurel City Council, and we ask that the same approval be granted once more so that Sonny’s legacy and his license may remain in Laurel, his and his family’s treasured hometown. 63 Page Four Thank you in advance for your consideration of this Special Request. We ask that you place us on your July agenda, and we pray that you will grant us long and valued service in Laurel. Warmest regards, Shelley Van Atta Owner, Sonny O’Day’s, Inc. Jodi Roberg On Behalf of the Owners, The Owl Café Cc: Departments of Revenue and Justice, Elizabeth Burns, Brett Krueger, et al. Crist, Krogh, Alke & Nord, PLLC David Sibley, Attorney for Purchasers Bcc: Various 64 File Attachments for Item: 6. Planning: Resolution - Resolution Of Intent Of The City Council To Annex The Property Legally Described As Parcel 1a Of Certificate Of Survey 3034, Amended (24), Being The Proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing, Adjacent To The City Of Laurel, As An Addition To The City Of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana, With Concurrent Approval Of Zoning Designation Upon Annexation Of The Property. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 65 R25-____ Annexation of Cherry Hill Subdivision and Concurrent Zoning RESOLUTION NO. R24-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO ANNEX THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 3034, AMENDED (24), BEING THE PROPOSED CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION, 4TH FILING, ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, AS AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA, WITH CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION UPON ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY. WHEREAS, Morrison-Maierle, Inc., on behalf of the property owner, Robert Stoltz (hereinafter “Petitioner”), submitted a Petition for Annexation, Request for Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat Application for the Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing, consisting of approximately 18.07 acres; WHEREAS, the property is legally described as S08, T02S, R24E, C.O.S. 3034, Parcel 1A, AMD (24), Yellowstone County, Montana, generally located west of Cherry Hills Drive and West Maryland Lane; WHEREAS, the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing, consists of 48 residential lots; WHEREAS, the current zoning designation is County Residential Tracts, and Petitioner seeks annexation and concurrent zoning as Residential 7500 (R-7500); WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of Laurel’s Annexation Policy, the City Council shall consider various criteria when reviewing a Petition for Annexation; WHEREAS, the Laurel City-County Planning Board/Zoning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on August 20, 2025, and unanimously recommended approval of the Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat with stated conditions; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Laurel held a duly advertised public hearing on the 9th day of September, 2025 at 6:30 p.m. regarding Petitioner’s request for Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat with stated conditions; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that annexation of the property is consistent with the City’s Annexation Policy, Growth Policy, and surrounding land uses, and that the proposed zoning designation of R-7500 is appropriate and consistent with adjacent zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that all statutory and ordinance requirements, including public notice, have been met and that annexation will allow extension of City services, including water, wastewater, and streets, to the subject property. 66 R25-____ Annexation of Cherry Hill Subdivision and Concurrent Zoning NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, as follows: 1. The following described territory is hereby annexed to the City of Laurel: S08, T02S, R24E, C.O.S. 3034, Parcel 1A, Amended (24), consisting of 18.07 acres, together with all contiguous rights-of-way. 2. Upon annexation, the property shall be zoned as Residential 7500 (R-7500). 3. The annexation is conditioned upon execution of an Annexation Agreement, Waiver of Right to Protest, and a Development Agreement, which terms are incorporated by reference herein. 4. All recommended mitigations and conditions identified by the Laurel City-County Planning Board, including but not limited to infrastructure improvements, stormwater management, geotechnical reporting, and weed management, shall be required as conditions of approval. 5. All required documents, including the Annexation Agreement, Waiver of Right to Protest, and this Resolution, shall be filed with the Yellowstone County Clerk & Recorder within ninety (90) days of approval. 6. Connections to City of Laurel water, sewer, and street systems shall be approved by the City’s Public Works Department. 7. Construction and installation of public improvements must be completed within two years of annexation or bonded at 125% of estimated cost, in accordance with Laurel Subdivision Regulations. 8. All improvements shall conform to City of Laurel and Montana Public Works standards. 9. Compliance with all mitigation measures and subdivision conditions set forth in the staff report and Planning Board recommendations, including requirements of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality and the Laurel Department of Public Works. 10. Submission of site-specific geotechnical reports prior to issuance of building permits for residential structures. The Mayor and City staff are authorized and directed to execute all documents necessary to effectuate this annexation and zoning designation. 67 R25-____ Annexation of Cherry Hill Subdivision and Concurrent Zoning This Resolution shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the City Council, and the City Clerk-Treasurer shall file a true and correct certified copy of this Resolution and Meeting Minutes with the Yellowstone County Clerk and Recorder. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ____________________, 2025, by Council Member ________________. PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the _____ day of ____________________, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor the _____ day of ____________________, 2025. CITY OF LAUREL ___________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney 68 1 LAUREL CITY-COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO: Laurel City Council FROM: Laurel-Yellowstone Planning Board and Zoning Commission RE: Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat of the Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing DATE: August 26, 2025 N/LOCATION: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Morrison-Maierle has submitted an annexation application, request for initial zoning and preliminary plat application for the Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4thFiling on behalf of the property owner/developer. The proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision 4thFiling is a 48-lot residential subdivision located on property west of Cherry Hills Drive and W. Maryland Lane in north -west Laurel. Approval of annexation and zone change would bring 18.07 acres of land into the City of Laurel and enable the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4thFiling to connect to the City water, wastewater, and street system. Agent: Martin Gagnon PE – Morison – Maierle Inc Owner: Robert Stoltz Legal Description: S08, T02 S, R24 E, C.O.S. 3034, PARCEL 1A, AMD(24) Address: Approximately 1800 West Maryland Lane Parcel Size: 18.07 acres Existing Land Use: Agricultural, vacant. Proposed Land Use: Residential Subdivision, 48 Lots Existing Zoning: County - Residential Tracts Proposed Zoning: Residential 7500 (R-7500) /LOCATION: BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY  April 16, 2025 - Pre-Application meeting with Morrison-Maierle and City/County Staff  July 2, 2025 – Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4thFiling Annexation application and preliminary plat application submitted to the City.  July 2-7, 2021 –Element Review letter to Morrison-Maierle. All elements required by LMC Chapter 16, Appendix F were present in the application. 69 2  July 15, 2025 – Sufficiency Review letter to Morrison-Maierle. All elements required by LMC Chapter 16, Appendix F were deemed sufficient to move the application forward. Certain comments were noted by the Planning Director from city various departments.  August 20, 2025 – A Public Hearing is scheduled by the Planning Board on the proposed Annexation, Initial Zoning, and Subdivision applications. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Applicant has submitted an application for annexation and preliminary plat containing all the necessary components needed for both to move forward. a. The annexation petition is consistent with the City of Laurel Annexation Policy. b. The requested Zoning Assignment is R-7500. i. The R-7500 assignment is consistent with the Growth Policy, surrounding land uses, zoning, and is the minimum required by the Laurel Annexation Policy. 2. Applicant has provided additional details of subdivision plans and documents where necessary. 3. Applicant has worked with multiple city departments to determine ef fectiveness of the proposed utilities for the property. 4. Applicant has provided updated documents whenever required by City departments. 5. City staff determined that the applications for annexation and preliminary plat were sufficient to move forward to Planning Board and City Council. 6. City staff have found only minor issues with the applications that require conditions of approval prior to the final plat approval stage. 7. The public noticing requirements of LMC 16.03.030 have been met. PLANNING BOARD AND GOVERNING BODY REVIEW CRITERIA LMC Chapter 16.03.040 - Staff and Agency Review: A. Review Procedure Schedule. Upon receipt of a complete and sufficient major preliminary plat application, the planning director or designee shall schedule the plat before the city- county planning board. B. Submittal Distribution. Planning staff shall distribute the application to all affected city and county departments, local, state, and federal agencies, school districts and public utilities for review as appropriate and indicate the review timeframe. Failure of any agency to complete a review of a plat will not be the basis for denial of the plat by the AGB. C. Plat Review. The planner shall review the major subdivision plat submittal and make a staff report of issues, concerns, conditions, or recommendations and send out the list to the planning board members with the agenda of the meeting at which the plat is to reviewed; a copy must also be sent to the subdivider or his representative. 70 3 D. Hearing Notice. The planning board shall hold a public hearing on all major and applicable subsequent minor preliminary plat applications, placing a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in Laurel not less than fifteen days prior to the date of a public hearing. The planner shall also notify the subdivider and each property owner of record, and each purchaser under contract for deed of record of property immediately adjoining land included in the plat and located within three hundred feet of the proposed subdivision by certified mail not less than fifteen days prior to the date of hearing (MCA § 76 -3-605(3)). E. Planner's Report. The planner shall prepare a draft findings of fact (the effect on agriculture, agricultural water user facilities, local services, the natural environment, wildlife and wildlife habitat, and public health and safety as per MCA § 76-3-608(3)(a)) for review by the planning board. The planner shall also forward the recommendation of the planning board to the AGB including basis for such recommendation and its compliance with adopted Growth Management Plan, the Bike/Ped Plan, and other adopted city and county plans and policies in writing no later than ten days after the public hearing (MCA § 76-3-605(4)). F. Subsequent Hearing. Before acting on the subdivision application, the AGB shall determine whether, subsequent to the public hearing, new information has become available or information that the public has not had a reasonable opportunity to examine. If so, the AGB may act on the subdivision application in accordance with this chapter or schedule a subsequent public hearing for consideration of only the new information that may have an impact on the findings and conclusions that the AGB will rely upon in making its decision on the proposed subdivision. The AGB may chose to hold the subsequent public hearing or may direct the planning board to hold it. In either case, the subsequent public hearing shall be held at the next scheduled meeting for which proper notice for the public hearing on the subdivision application can be provided. If a subsequent hearing is held, the sixty- or eighty-day working day review period is suspended, and the new hearing must be noticed and held within forty-five days of the AGB's determination to hold a subsequent public hearing. The sixty- or eighty- working day review period will resume from the date of the subsequent public hearing. The governing body may not consider any information that is presented after the subsequent hearing (MCA § 76 -3-615). G. Subdivider's Preference. The AGB shall give due weight and consideration to the subdivider's expressed preferences if the AGB requires mitigation of significant adverse impacts (MCA § 76 - 3-608(5)(b)). In reviewing a subdivision and when requiring mitigation, the AGB may not unreasonably restrict a landowner's ability to develop land, but it is recognized that in some instances the unmitigated impacts of a proposed development may be unacceptable and will preclude approval of the plat (MCA §76-3-608(5)(a)). The AGB shall send the subdivider written notice of its decision and the reason therefore. (MCA § 76-3-608(4)). 71 4 RECOMMENDATIONS Advisory Recommendations to the City Council: 1. The Planning Board encourages the City Council to use the Cash-in-lieu of Parkland for the 4th Filing to improve the dedicated Parkland associated with the Cherry Hill Subdivision developments. Such improvements could include, irrigation systems and playground equipment. 2. That the City Council accept the offer to prepare all of the documentation to create a Special Improvement District for the installation of the bridge across the Big Ditch. The Planning Board recognizes that there are significant challenges that must be overcome, but the east -west connection of West Maryland and NW Maryland from 1st Ave to Golf Course Road are crucial to the future growth and development of the City of Laurel. 3. That the City Council accepts the minor street design modifications and allow for curb walk in those portions of the subdivision where the road network is located within regulated wetlands. This minor modification has been requested by the US Army Corps of Engineers and would require that the owners within the 4th filing ensure that the snow is removed from the sidewalks in addition to their individual lots. The Planning Board recommends that the City Council approve the Annexation and Initial Zoning, and Preliminary Plat of the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4thFiling to Residential R-7500 with the following conditions. 1. The Annexation Agreement, Waiver of Right to Protest, and the City Council Resolution approving annexation shall be filed with the Yellowstone County Clerk & Recorder within 90-days of annexation approval. 2. All recommended mitigations contained in the subdivision application and supporting materials submitted for public review shall be required for Final Plat approval. 3. The Final Plat, plans and specifications shall substantially comply with what has been submitted and reviewed during preliminary plat review. The only exceptions would be to comply with stricter requirements in the MDEQ approval or imposed by the Laurel City Council either by condition or adopted city ordinance. 4. All construction and installation of public improvements must conform to the standards of the Laurel Department of Public Works and Montana Public Works standards. 5. All construction and installation of public improvements must be completed within two years of annexation or bonded for as provided by the Laurel Subdivision Regulations. 6. If the public improvements are not constructed at the time of annexation, the property owner shall provide the city a bond or letter of credit that equals 125% of the estimated engineering costs for the construction of improvements. If the property owner fai ls to construct the improvements or to obtain the agreed upon engineering, the city shall utilize the bond or letter of credit to pay for the construction, including engineering; In accordance with GASB-34, the Developer of Landowner shall provide the city the total cost and/or value of the improvements including, but not limited to, parks, sidewalks, curb and gutter, lift stations, and sewer and water lines, that are conveyed to the city. 7. As discussed in the geotechnical report, the soils within the subdiv ision are variable and not well suited for standard construction protocols. As such, any construction of public infrastructure or residential structures on the resulting lots will first require site specific geotechnical reports prior to the start of construction. In the case of residential 72 5 construction, a building permit should not be issued until a site-specific geotechnical report has been prepared and submitted along with the building permit application. The Planning Board recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for the Cherry Hill Subdivision 4thFiling with the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plat and supporting water and wastewater design will be approved by Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). 2. The Preliminary Plat, Subdivision Improvements Agreement, and City Council Resolution granting approval shall be filed with the Yellowstone County Clerk & Recorder within 90 - days of preliminary plat approval. 3. The Roadways and Right-of-Ways shall be constructed to the specifications presented in the plat plan and supporting documentation except as modified by these conditions. 4. This Preliminary Approval shall be valid for 3 calendar years from the date of approval. 5. Hydrant flow tests must be approved by the City and its contracted engineer. 6. Verification must be provided to the City for the water modelling noted by the engineer in the field 7. Water model exhibits must be provided to and approved by the City showing the system characteristics and modeled properties compared to measured properties 8. Wastewater/Sewer analysis must be provided to and approved by the City. 9. A map of pre-developed stormwater conditions including the boundary, routing, and calculations must be provided to and approved by the City. 10. Water quality storm volumes and calculation sheets shall be provided to the City. 11. Any construction of public infrastructure or residential structures on the resulting lots will first require site specific geotechnical reports prior to the start of construction. In the case of residential construction, a building permit should not be issued until a site-specific geotechnical report has been prepared and submitted along with the building permit application. 12. The conditions of the Geotechnical report shall be followed durin g the construction of the public infrastructure. 13. A Weed Management Plan shall be prepared for the project and approved by the Yellowstone County Weed District. ATTACHMENTS Annexation and Zone Change: 1. Annexation Application cover Letter 2. Annexation Application Form 3. Annexation Agreement 4. Waiver of Right to Protest Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4thFiling: 1. Cover Sheet 2. Preliminary Plat Application 73 6 3. Adjacent Property owners list 4. Draft Subdivision Improvements Agreement 5. Environmental Assessment 6. Traffic Impact Study 7. Lot Layout 8. Geotechnical Report 9. Subdivision Bylaws 10. Homeowners Association Bylaw 11. ROW Easement documents 12. LMC 16.03 – Subdivision Review Procedures 13. LMC 16.04 – Development Requirements 14. KLJ. Inc Preliminary Plat Review Comments letter (July 2025) 74 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Preliminary Plat Application July 2025 Prepared for: Western Holdings, LLC PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105 Prepared by: 75 July 2nd, 2025 Kurt Markegard City Planning Director City of Laurel PO Box 10 115 West First Street Laurel, MT 59044-0010 Re: Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Preliminary Plat Application Dear Mr. Markegard: Enclosed is an application for Preliminary Plat for the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing, located in the North ½ of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East, Yellowstone County, Montana as COS #3034. Please find the following information included with this letter for your review a Joint Application: · Preliminary Plat Application Form · Review Fee of $6,100.00 (includes pre-application meeting fee) · Required Supplementary Information · Preliminary Plat Drawings o 24” x 36” (Full Size) – 2 Copies (attached separately) o 11” x 17” (Reduced) – 6 Copies (in binder) · Vicinity Map · Preliminary Engineering Plans · Conceptual Lot Layout · Legal Description for Property (COS #3034) · Existing Easement Documents If you have any questions or comments about this project, please feel free to contact me at (406) 371-6052 or kkukes@m-m.net. Sincerely, _____________________________ Kolter Kukes, PE cc: MMI File # 6683.001.004 76 Bookmark Summary Section 1 - Preliminary Plat Application Form Page 5 Section 2 Supplementary Information Summary Page 9 Section 3 - Adjoining Property Owners Page 16 Section 3.5 - Draft Subdivision Improvements Agreement Page 19 Section 4 - Environmental Assessment Page 29 Section 5 - Traffic Accessibility Study (TAS)Page 150 Section 6 - Geotechnical Report & Supplementary Memos Page 195 Section 7 - Draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Page 218 Section 8 - Draft Bylaws Page 230 Section 9 - Draft Articles of Incorporation Page 244 Section 10 - Preliminary Plat Page 247 Section 11 - Engineering Plans Page 249 Section 12 - Conceptual Lot Layout Page 274 Section 13 - Certificate of Survey Page 277 Section 14 - Existing Utility Easements Page 279 Section 15 - Perpetual ROW Page 282 7/2/2025 77 78 SECTION 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM 79 Preliminary Plat Application Subdivision Name: Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Date of Preapplication Meeting: April 16th, 2025 at 2 p.m. Type: Major First Minor _______ Subsequent Minor _______ Tax Code: 000D125620 Location: COS 3034 – TRACT 1A Legal Description: S08, T02 S, R24 E, C.O.S. 3034, PARCEL 1A, AMD (24) ¼ Section: NW 1/4, Township: 02S, Range: 24E General Location: City of Laurel, Montana Subdivider Information: Name (Include a list of officers if corporation): Western Holdings, LLC Address: 3329 McMasters Rd Billings, MT 59101 Telephone: (307) 752-7003 E-mail: jrcivil.com Owner Information: Name: Robert Stoltz Address: PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105 Telephone: 406-259-3741 Email: jrcivil@jrcivil.com Plat Data: Gross Area: 18.07 AC Net Area: 10.20 AC Number of Lots: 48 Maximum Lot Size: 13,529 SF Minimum Lot Size: 7,532 SF Linear Feet of Streets: 2,956 LF Existing Zoning: Residential Surrounding Zoning North: Residential South: Residential 7500 East: Residential 7500 West: Residential 7500 Existing Land Use: Agricultural Proposed Land Use: Residential Parkland Requirement: Land: N/A Acres: N/A Cash: Cash: $ 14,700 80 Variances Requested (list and attach Variance Request): 1. N/A Service Providers for Proposed Subdivision Gas: Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. Electric: Northwestern Energy Telephone: Century Link School (Elementary, Middle, High): Elementary – South, West, or Graff (dependent on grade level) Middle School – Laurel Middle School High School – Laurel High School Irrigation District: N/A Cable Television: TBD List of Materials Submitted with Application 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Required Supporting Documents for Major Preliminary Plat Applications 3. Immediately Adjoining Property Owners List 4. Environmental Assessment 5. Traffic Impact Study 6. Conceptual Lot Layout 7. Geotechnical Report 8. Draft Protective Covenants 9. Draft Subdivision Bylaws 10. Draft HOA Articles of Incorporation 11. Preliminary Plat Drawings – 11” x 17” & 24” x 36” 12. Legal Description – COS 3034 13. Pipeline Easement 14. ROW Easement Agent Information Name: Martin E. Gagnon, PE – Morrison-Maierle Inc. Address: 2880 Technology Blvd W Bozeman, MT 59771 Telephone: (406) 587-0721 Email: mgagnon@m-m.net 81 82 SECTION 2 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUMMARY 83 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Preliminary Plat Supplemental Information Summary According to Appendix F The following document is intended to summarize the supporting documents required by Appendix F of the Subdivision Regulations for the City of Laurel. The requirements from the appendix have been reproduced with responses provided in bold text. Required Supporting Documents for Major Preliminary Plat Applications 1. Names and addresses of immediately adjoining property owners typed or neatly printed on address labels. A list of immediately adjoining property owners has been prepared and is attached at the front of the package, as well as address labels. 2. Draft Subdivision Improvements Agreement (Appendix L). A subdivision improvements agreement has been included. 3. Environmental Assessment or Summary of Probable Impacts, when applicable (Article 23-900). An environmental assessment report has been prepared and is attached. 4. Traffic Accessibility Study (TAS) when applicable, containing the following information: a. Trip generation, using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; b. Trip distribution; c. Traffic assignment; d. Capacity analysis; e. Evaluation; and f. Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications, and any mitigation techniques. g. Land use and trip generation in the form of a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used (daily and peak) and resulting trip generation. h. Traffic graphics, which show: · AM peak hour site traffic; · PM peak hour site traffic; · AM peak hour total traffic; · PM peak hour total traffic; · Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately). i. AM and PM capacity analysis with an AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis provided for: · All major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets or roads; and · All arterial-arterial, collector-collector and arterial-collector intersections within one mile of the site, or as required by the Director of Public Service during the pre-application review. 84 j. Capacity. Indicate the levels of service (before and after development) of existing and proposed streets and roads, including appropriate intersections, to safely handle any increased traffic. Describe any anticipated increased maintenance that will be necessary due to increased traffic and who will pay the cost of maintenance. k. Bicycle and Pedestrian Pathways, Lanes and Routes. Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways, lanes or routes to be developed with the development. l. Traffic Calming. Detailed drawings of any proposed traffic calming installations, including locations and turning radius templates. A Traffic Impact Study Report for the proposed subdivision has been completed by Morrison Maierle and is attached. 5. Preliminary water and sanitation information, including: a. A site plan or exhibit that shows: - The location, within 100 feet outside of the exterior property line of subdivision and on the proposed lots, of: · Floodplains None exist on or near the property. · Surface water features All are shown on preliminary plat. · Springs None exist on or near the property. · Irrigation ditches All are shown on preliminary plat. · Existing, previously approved, and, for parcels less than 20 acres, proposed water wells and wastewater treatment systems; None are proposed for the property. · For parcels less than 20 acres, mixing zones identified, and Not applicable – service provided by public water/sewer. · The representative drain field site used for the soil profile description, and Not applicable – no subsurface drain fields are proposed. - The location, within 500 feet outside of the exterior property line of the subdivision, of public water and sewer facilities. All are shown on preliminary plat. An independent site plan for the property has not been provided, as this information is provided by on the Preliminary Plat document. The subdivision is not proposing to utilize groundwater wells or septic drain fields. b. A description of the proposed subdivision's water supply systems, storm water systems, solid waste disposal systems, and wastewater treatment systems, including whether the water supply and wastewater treatment systems are individual, shared, multiple user, or public as those systems are defined in rules published by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). 85 Water Supply System Description The Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision consists of 48 lots and is proposed to connect to existing 8” and 12” water main owned and operated by the City of Laurel. The existing 12” main is located in an existing easement through the southern portion of the property along the proposed extension of W. Maryland Lane. Two additional connections are proposed along the southern portion of the property along W. Maryland Lane to complete a looped water main that will serve the proposed subdivision. The subdivision is proposed downstream of an existing booster station. The average daily demand is approximated to be 130 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The 48 lots account for a single-family residence as well as an additional dwelling unit. The single-family home population estimate is 2.83 persons per dwelling and 1.5 persons per ADU since proposed lot areas will not provide a large ADU footprint area. The total population estimate for the proposed subdivision is 208 people. Maximum daily demands (MDD) for residential developments can be calculated by multiplying average demand by the MDD peaking factor of 2.5. Fire flows required by the Standards for low and medium density developments is 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Using the parameters above, the demands for the subdivision were approximated as follows: Table 1: Cherry Hill 4th Filing Proposed Demands Demand Parameter Demand (gpd)* Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand 27,259 18.9 Maximum Day Demand 68,148 47.3 Maximum Day + Fire Flow Demand -- 1,047.3 * Note: The average day demand per ADU was rounded from 195 to 200 gpd. In addition to the water demands associated with the proposed subdivision, water demands from the existing Elena and Cherry Hill 3rd Filing subdivisions and Elena Park irrigation were included in a water model to verify the existing public water system is sufficient. The Elena subdivision contributes 62.7 gpm maximum day demand, Cherry Hill 3rd Filing development adds 17.4 gpm, and Elena Park was accounted for with 4.52 gpm of park irrigation. The total analyzed maximum day demand from the proposed and existing development is 132 gpm. The existing system is capable of supplying the water demand. Storm Water Systems Description Storm water collection is proposed via network of street curbs and inlets, conveyed via stormwater piping, and treated using an existing stormwater retention pond within the Utility Lot 1 of the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing Subdivision. The retention facility was oversized during the design of Cherry Hill 3rd Filing in anticipation of providing capacity for the future phase of development. The 86 facilities were designed using MDEQ Circular 8. Further information on the proposed system can be found in Section 4. Wastewater Treatment System Description There are 48 lots within the proposed subdivision. Based on an average flow value of 100 gpcd and 2.83 persons per single-family dwelling and 1.5 persons per ADU, there will be an average of approximately 20,784 gpd (14.4 gpm) generated by the subdivision. Peak flow assuming a population of 208 people, and a peaking factor of 4.1 (DEQ-2 Equation 10-1) is estimated at 59.8 gpm. The subdivision will convey waste to an existing 8” public sewer main located in an existing easement through the southern portion of the property along the proposed extension of Maryland Lane. The Elena Subdivision is estimated to contribute an average flow of 27,734 gpd to the existing mains assuming the lot counts are 48 condominiums and 50 single family residences. The population assumed for this calculation is approximately 278 persons. The Cherry Hill 3rd filing contributes an estimated 7,700 gpd to the existing mains based on 77 persons. The total estimated population is 563 within the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision 4th Filing, the existing Cherry Hill Subdivision 3rd Filing and the Elena Subdivision. The peaking factor based on a population of 563 people when calculated using DEQ-2 Equation 10-1 is 3.9. The average estimated flow from these combined populations is 56,300 gpd (39.1 gpm), with peak flow approximated to be 154.3 gpm. Eight-inch sewer mains installed at minimum slope are capable of conveying flows at 50% capacity of 167 gpm. There is a remaining capacity of 12.7 gpm of flow in existing 8” sewer mains downstream prior to connecting larger mains. c. A drawing of the conceptual lot layout at a scale no smaller than 1 inch equal to 200 feet that shows all information required for a lot layout document in rules adopted by MDEQ pursuant to MCA §76-4-104. A conceptual lot layout meeting the requirements above is attached. d. Evidence of suitability for new onsite wastewater treatment systems that, at a minimum, includes: - A soil profile description from a representative drain field site identified on the vicinity map, as provided above, that complies with standards published by the MDEQ, - Demonstration that the soil profile contains a minimum of 4 feet of vertical separation distance between the bottom of the permeable surface of the proposed wastewater treatment system and a limiting layer, and - In cases in which the soil profile or other information indicates that groundwater is within 7 feet of the natural ground surface, evidence that the groundwater will not exceed the minimum vertical separation distance. Wastewater service will be provided by the City of Laurel via service connection to existing sewer mains. This section is not applicable. e. For new water supply systems, unless cisterns are proposed, evidence of adequate water availability; - Obtained from well logs or testing of onsite or nearby wells; - Obtained from information contained in published hydro-geological reports; or - As otherwise specified by rules adopted by the MDEQ pursuant to MCA §76-4-104. Water service will be provided by the City of Laurel via service connection to existing water mains. This section is not applicable. 87 f. A preliminary analysis of potential impacts to the groundwater quality from new wastewater treatment systems, using as guidance rules adopted by the Board of Environmental Review pursuant to MCA §75-5-301 and MCA §75-5-303 related to standard mixing zones for groundwater, source specific mixing zones, and nonsignificant changes in water quality. The preliminary analysis may be based on currently available information and must consider the effects of overlapping mixing zones from proposed and existing wastewater treatment systems within and directly adjacent to the subdivision. Instead of performing the preliminary analysis required under this subsection, the subdivider may perform a complete nondegradation analysis in the same manner as is required for an application that is reviewed under Title 76, Chapter 4, Mont. Code Ann. Wastewater service will be provided by the City of Laurel via service connection to existing sewer mains. This section is not applicable. g. A subdivider whose land division is excluded from review under MCA §76-4-125(2) is not required to submit the water and sanitation information listed above. Not applicable. 6. Geotechnical Report that includes: a. A summary of hazards present and recommended actions. b. A description of proposed construction. c. A description of the investigation methods, including field investigations, laboratory analysis and report preparation. d. A description of the site conditions, including soil, bedrock, groundwater and other physical features present that may limit development. e. Analysis of engineering properties and recommendations in relation to foundations; over- excavation and engineered fill; bearing capacity; lateral loads on basement walls; soil friction factor; earthwork; site grading and runoff control; foundation and retaining wall drainages; slabs on grade; reinforcing, utilities testing and concrete considerations; and ventilation and radon. f. Summary of engineering limitations. g. The report shall be accompanied by figures and tables sufficient to convey the results of each test hole and an overall site plan showing the location of each test hole. The spacing of test holes will be dependent of the horizontal and vertical variation of the subsurface material. In all cases, the spacing should result in a representation of all soils present on the subdivision. A geotechnical report was prepared by Rawhide Engineering, Inc. This report is attached. The report addresses excavation, backfill and imported fill requirements for the utility trenches and road construction. Analysis regarding foundations according to requirements of item 6.e. were not included in the report. This application includes a Geotechnical Requirements Memo that details the challenges with accurately fulfilling this requirement prior to the foundation type being selected for each lot. In lieu of providing geotechnical recommendations in accordance with item 6.e. for the entire subdivision, the memo proposes several solutions for informing each lot owner they are required to complete a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes information required in item 6.e. The solutions include language in the Preliminary Plat stating, “All Lot Owners will be required to provide a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes information required in Item 6e. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer in Montana, and be included in the Building Permit Application to the City of Laurel.” The preceding language is also included in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Geotechnical Evaluation Report must be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee and realtors will be informed of 88 the Geotechnical Evaluation requirements and required to inform all potential lot buyers of the requirement. The Geotechnical Requirements memo is included in the supplementary information of this application. 7. Draft protective and restrictive covenants, if any. A draft copy of protective and restrictive covenants is attached, along with draft bylaws. 8. Draft Articles of Incorporation when Homeowner's Association is proposed. A Draft Articles of Incorporation is attached. 9. When a tract of land is to be subdivided in separate filings, a Master Plan of the entire area to be developed. Not applicable. No further filings are proposed at this time. 89 SECTION 3 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS 90 MARK W & JOYCE A CARLSON PO BOX 216 LAUREL, MT 59044 TODD M & KIMBERLY N BENSON 1480 W 12TH STREET LAUREL, MT 59044 JEROME P & HAZEL L KLEIN 411 W 14TH STREET LAUREL, MT 59044 MARC A LACKMAN TRUSTEE PO BOX 74 LAUREL, MT 59044 TY HEPPNER 11 BACKFORTY RD PARK CITY, MT 59063 CHARLES JAMES S & KYLEE S EDGMOND 926 7TH AVE LAUREL, MT 59044 WESTERN HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC 3329 MCMASTERS RD BILLINGS, MT 59101 SPENCER & BEVERLY ZUAGG 235 S 41ST ST W BILLINGS, MT 59106 AMISH HERITAGE HOMES INC 12715 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL MOLT, MT 59057 JOHN CHARLES & LAURA BRYANT FLEMMING 2414 IVY LN BILLINGS, MT 59102 BRENNAN & KATELYN WHITTMEYER 1019 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 PAUL E & SANDRA L THOMAE 1013 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 KAREN MEYER MARONEY 1008 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 SETH D BYLER 1014 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 ALINA & TAYLOR BLAESIUS 1020 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 JAMES D & LAURA D KEMPER 1026 JENEA DR LAUREL, MT 59044 NATHAN LEE CREEK 307 14TH AVE SW SIDNEY, MT 59270 MATTHEW WILLIAM WHEELER 1310 HILL CREST AVE LAUREL, MT 59044 JAMES L HOTCHKISS REVOCABLE TRUST 1603 W 9TH ST LAUREL, MT 59044 KENNETH J & ROSALINA J SHERMAN 1649 W 9TH ST LAUREL, MT 59044 MATTHEW WILLIAM WHEELER & JASON JOHN WHEELER 1310 HILL CREST AVE LAUREL, MT 59044 JOHN P & MEGAN E WETENDORF 905 17TH AVE LAUREL, MT 59044 KEITH W & NANCY E METZGER 1731 W MARYLAND LN LAUREL, MT 59044 ROBERT & DEE BAXTER FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 932 LAUREL, MT 59044 DRAKE & MICHAEL B WEBINGER 1001 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 STACENE STRALEY 1003 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 CHRISTOPHER B & CRYSTAL ANN GOMEZ 1785 PHEASANT BROOK DR LAUREL, MT 59044 91 RUSSELL W & ROBBIN G NAUMAN 1007 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 LANCE HULL 1107 2ND AVE LAUREL, MT 59044 WILLIAM W & NICKOLETTE S HAGEMAN 1011 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 RONALD W SLETTEN 1013 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 STEVEN A & MARY ELIZABETH RIESINGER 1103 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 PATRICK & TERESA LYNCH 1105 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 TYLER & KRISTIN NOSE 1107 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 DAK ROY FIKE & JOY CROFT FIKE 1109 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 CHRISTINE A GOODPASTER & KAREN R TUMBERG 1108 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 GEORGINA T CLEGG TRUSTEE 1106 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 CLINT & TRACI BOGGESS 1104 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 TREVOR L & MARKI R KIRSCHENMANN 1102 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 JESSE J & JILLIAN T STENSVAD 1012 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 CHRISTOPHER L ANDERSON 1010 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 JAMIE D PLUHAR 1008 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 PATRICK J & LANA L THOMPSON 1006 DAVIS CIR LAUREL, MT 59044 DERRICK CHRISTOPHER & MARY JUNE SAMMONS 1007 ELS DR LAUREL, MT 59044 CITY OF LAUREL PO BOX 10 LAUREL, MT 59044 92 SECTION 3.5 DRAFT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT 93 SIA-1 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing I. Variances (page #): II. Conditions that Run with the Land: III. Transportation: A. Streets B. Sidewalks C. Street Lighting D. Traffic Control Devices E. Access F. Heritage Trail Plan G. Public Transit IV. Emergency Services: V. Storm Drainage: VI. Utilities: A. Water B. Sanitary Sewer C. Power, Telephone, Gas, and Cable Television VII. Parks/Open Space: VIII. Irrigation: IX. Soils/Geotechnical Study: X. Phasing of Improvements: XI. Financial Guarantees: XII. Legal Provisions: 94 SIA-1 This agreement is made and entered into this _______ day of ________, 20___, by and between WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC (Subdivider), whose address for the purpose of this agreement is PO Box 51330, Billings, MT 59105, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF LAUREL, 115 W 1st Street or PO Box 10, Laurel, MT 59044, hereinafter referred to as "City." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, at a regular meeting conducted on _______ day of ________, 20___, the Laurel City-County Planning Board recommended conditional approval of a preliminary plat of Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting conducted on _______ day of ________, 20___, the Laurel City Council conditionally approved a preliminary plat of Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing; and WHEREAS, a Subdivision Improvements Agreement is required by the City prior to the approval of the final plat. WHEREAS, the provisions of this agreement shall be effective and applicable to Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing upon the filing of the final plat thereof in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Yellowstone County, Montana. The Subdivision shall comply with all requirements of the City of Laurel Subdivision Regulations, the rules, regulations, policies, and resolutions of the City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, and the laws and administrative rules of the State of Montana. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT, for and in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, do hereby agree as follows: I. VARIANCES A. A variance to utilize 60-ft rights-of-way is being requested for the Residential Local Access Road (Table 16.4.C.1). The existing rights-of-way on adjacent subdivision roads are 60 feet, and this would allow the development to match and continue those to be consistent. II. CONDITIONS THAT RUN WITH THE LAND (Insert any applicable conditions in the provided A, B, C format. The following are typical conditions that run with the land, which may or may not be applicable to this subdivision): A. Lot owners shall be required to construct that segment of the required sidewalk that fronts their property at the time of lot development. B. Lot owners should be aware that this subdivision is being built in close proximity to prime deer and antelope habitat and it is likely that homeowners will experience problems 95 SIA-2 with damage to landscaped shrubs, flowers, and gardens. The Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Department does not provide damage assistance unless there is damage to commercial crops and/or a threat to public health and safety. C. Lot owners should be aware that soil characteristics within the area of this subdivision, as described in the 1972 Yellowstone County Soil Survey, indicate that there could be potential limitations for proposed construction on the lots, which may require a geotechnical survey prior to construction. D. No water rights have been transferred to the lot owners. Irrigation ditches that exist on the perimeter of this development are for the benefit of other properties. Perimeter ditches and drains shall remain in place and shall not be altered by the Subdivider or subsequent owners. E. There is attached hereto a Waiver waiving the right to protest the creation of the special improvement district or districts, which by this reference is expressly incorporated herein and made as much a part hereof as though fully and completely set forth herein at this point. The Waiver shall be filed with the plat, shall run with the land, and shall constitute the guarantee by the Subdivider and property owner or owners of the developments described herein. Said Waiver is effective upon filing and is not conditioned on the completion of the conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Subdivider and owner specifically agree that they are waiving valuable rights and do so voluntarily. III. TRANSPORTATION A. Streets Right-of-Way (ROW) dedications shall be made for extensions of Cherry Hills Drive (60 feet) and Maryland Lane (80 feet), as well as new internal roads Heather Drive (60 feet) and Rochelle Lane (60 feet). Streets shall have widths of 33 feet edge-of-pavement to edge-of-pavement (i.e., 37’ TBC to TBC) within 60-foot ROWs. 45 feet edge-of-pavement to edge-of-pavement (i.e., 49’ TBC to TBC) within 80-foot ROWs. Streets shall include standard 2’ catch curb and gutters on each side of the road. Some valley gutters may be required. These curb/gutter and valley gutter items shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Laurel Public Works Department prior to installation. B. Bridges The project owner will apply for a Subdivision Improvements District for the proposed future bridge that will cross the Big Ditch irrigation lateral. C. Sidewalks A standard 5’ sidewalk is proposed on both sides of each street. Sidewalks shall be located within the public Rights-of-Way and be located 1 foot offset from the Rights-of-Way extents. 96 SIA-3 D. Street Lighting Streetlights are not anticipated or proposed for this development. E. Traffic Control Devices Stop signs shall be placed to control northbound and southbound traffic from Sophia Lane and Cherry Hills Drive onto Maryland Lane. F. Access Access to the subdivision will be by extensions of West Maryland Lane and Cherry Hills Drive. The extension of West Maryland Lane will provide a connection to the Elena Subdivision. Lots shall include single accesses from the public Rights-of-Way. Each lot shall be limited to a single access. G. Bike or Pedestrian Trail Plans West Maryland Lane appears to be a Primary Bikeway (on-street bikeway). The proposed 49’ TBC-TBC section for the extension of Maryland Lane should provide a bike route to provide separation between vehicles and bicyclist. The bikeway should not require markings. H. Public Transit No locations for public transportation will be installed within the development. IV. EMERGENCY SERVICE Two emergency accesses to the subdivision are proposed using Cherry Hills Drive (37’ TBC-TBC) and Maryland Lane (49’ TBC-TBC). These shall be paved roadways constructed to City of Laurel standards. V. STORM DRAINAGE All drainage improvements shall comply with the provisions of the Storm water Management Manual, and a storm water management plan shall be submitted to and approved by the MDEQ. No existing treatment facilities exist on the property. A retention pond constructed within the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 3rd Filing was over-sized to anticipate the retention storage requirement for the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing. The Cherry Hill – 4th Filing subdivision will use the existing retention storage pond to treat stormwater runoff. No other improvements are proposed to existing storm drain systems. 97 SIA-4 VI. UTILITIES The SIA does not constitute an approval for extension of or connection to water mains and sanitary sewers. The property owner shall make application for extension/connection of water mains and sanitary sewers to the Public Works Department. The extension/connection of/to water mains and sanitary sewers is subject to the approval of the applications and the conditions of approval. Applications shall be submitted for processing prior to the start of any construction and prior to review and approval of any project plans and specifications. The appropriate water and wastewater hookup fees in effect shall be submitted with the applications. Fees shall be paid for the lots in Cherry Hill 4th Filing for the extension of services as per the first paragraph above. The Developer/Owner acknowledges that the subdivision shall be subject to the applicable System Development Fees in effect at the time new water and/or sanitary sewer service connections are made. The design/installation of sanitary sewers and appurtenances, and water mains and appurtenances (fire hydrants, etc.) shall be in accordance with design standards, specifications, rules, regulations of and as approved by the City of Laurel Public Works Department, Fire Department, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, and Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. A. Water No unique water facilities are proposed for the subdivision. Water services are proposed to be extended from the existing City of Laurel public water mains located in West Maryland Lane and Cherry Hills Drive. B. Sanitary Sewer No unique sanitary sewer facilities are proposed for the subdivision. Sewer services shall be extended from the existing City of Laurel public sewer mains. C. Power, Telephone, Gas, and Cable Television No public services are proposed within the public right-of-way. Power, telephone, gas, and cable television services will be provided within 10-foot-wide public utility easements along lot frontages to proposed rights-of-way. VII. PARKS/OPEN SPACE The developer is proposing a cash-in-lieu payment of $14,700 as a substitution for parks/open space and shall be paid concurrently with Final Platting or as required by the City of Laurel. 98 SIA-5 VIII. IRRIGATION No irrigation districts are proposed to be affected by the development. No existing easements exist for ditches within the property. Irrigation ditches (if encountered) shall be undisturbed during construction if possible or piped using culverts. If piping is proposed, those ditches will be evaluated to maintain the required capacity. Storm water best management practices shall be implemented to prevent impacts from construction runoff as applicable. IX. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL STUDY Based on a geotechnical investigation, lean clay with sand was encountered at the site. Soils were generally medium stiff to soft with a moderate plastic index. Water table was not encountered during the exploration up to depths of 8.5 feet. The geotechnical investigation provided recommendations for excavations, utility trench backfill, structural fill material, compaction requirements and asphalt pavement sections that should be incorporated during construction. All Lot Owners will be required to provide a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes the information required in Appendix F, Item 6.e, of the Laurel Subdivision Regulations. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer in Montana and be included in the Building Permit Application from the City of Laurel. The Geotechnical Evaluation Report must be submitted to and reviewed by the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Architecture and Building Development Group. X. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES Except as otherwise provided, Subdivider shall install and construct said required improvements with cash or by utilizing the mechanics of a special improvement district or private contracts secured by letters of credit or a letter of commitment to lend funds from a commercial lender. All engineering and legal work in connection with such improvements shall be paid by the contracting parties pursuant to said special improvement district or private contract, and the improvements shall be installed as approved by the Public Works and Public Utilities Department. At this time, no financial guarantees are anticipated for required infrastructure. XI. LEGAL PROVISIONS A. Subdivider agrees to guarantee all public improvements for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance by the AGB. B. The owners of the properties involved in this proposed Subdivision by signature subscribed herein below agree, consent, and shall be bound by the provisions of this Agreement. 99 SIA-6 C. The covenants, agreements, and all statements in this Agreement apply to and shall be binding on the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties. D. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing party or the party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs. E. Any amendments or modifications of this Agreement or any provisions herein shall be made in writing and executed in the same manner as this original document and shall after execution become a part of this Agreement. F. Subdivider shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, ordinances, and administrative regulations during the performance and discharge of its obligations. Subdivider acknowledges and agrees that nothing contained herein shall relieve or exempt it from such compliance. 100 SIA-7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the _____ day of ___________________, 20____. “SUBDIVIDER” WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC By: Title: _______________________________ STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Yellowstone ) On this ____ day of , 20___, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Montana, personally appeared _______________________, known to me to be the person who signed the foregoing instrument as_____________________ of (Name of Subdivider), and who acknowledged to me that said Subdivider executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year hereinabove written. Notary Public in and for the State of Montana Printed name: Residing at: My commission expires: 101 SIA-8 This Agreement is hereby approved and accepted by City of Laurel, this ___ day of , 20___. “CITY” CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Yellowstone ) On this _____ day of , 20___, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared __________________________________, and , known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Laurel, Montana, whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument in such capacity and acknowledged to me that they executed the same on behalf of the City of Laurel, Montana. Notary Public in and for the State of Montana Printed name: Residing at: My commission expires: Approved as to Form: City Attorney 102 SECTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 103 1 of 15 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 16.09.030 – Environmental Description Contents A. Surface Water 1. Locate on a plat overlay or sketch map all surface water and the delineated floodways that may affect or be affected by the proposed subdivision including natural water systems (streams, lakes, rivers, or marshes), artificial water systems (canals, ditches, aqueducts, reservoirs, irrigation or drainage systems), and land subject to flooding (see also Section 16.04.140 and Appendix O, Flood Hazard Evaluation). Response: See Preliminary Plat, Section 10. 2. Describe all surface water that may affect or be affected by the proposed subdivision including name, approximate size, present use, and time of year that water is present. Response: A wetland delineation of the proposed subdivision, included in Appendix I, was performed by Morrison-Maierle on November 2, 2020, with a wetland delineation report date of March 2021. A 3.58-acre wetland was delineated within the proposed Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision boundary. Construction disturbance in the wetlands will be minimized by lot boundaries that maximize the wetlands area within the open space lots. Maryland Lane and Cherry Hills Drive roadways will be constructed across the south and two north portions of the wetland. The Maryland Lane south wetland crossing traverses the wetland along an existing gravel road that crosses wetland to minimize disturbance. Maryland Lane will cross the Big Ditch Canal via a bridge to connect to the existing NW Maryland Lane dead end. The Big Ditch Canal surface water spans a width of around 18 feet. The Mayland lane connection will provide improved access for the proposed subdivision, existing subdivisions and emergency personnel to Interstate 90. The proposed subdivision does not lie within the FEMA floodway or 100-year floodplain. The property is located on FEMA Panel 300142 and 300086 and lies within Zone X (Area of Minimal Flood Hazard) and Zone D (Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard). 3. Describe the proximity of proposed construction (such as buildings, sewer systems, roads) to surface water. Response: The nearest surface water to Cherry Hill 4th Filing is the Big Ditch Canal that bounds the northern boundary of the proposed subdivision. The northern project boundary consists of an approximately 30-foot vegetative buffer from the Big Ditch Canal bank. Residential – 7500 zoning regulations require 5’ side and rear building setbacks. Therefore, single-family home foundations will be at least 35 feet from the Big Ditch Canal. The construction of Cherry Hills Drive will be over 100 feet from the canal. 4. Describe any existing or proposed stream bank or shoreline alterations and/or any proposed construction or modification of lakebeds or stream channels. Provide information on the location, extent, type, and purpose of any proposed alteration. 104 2 of 15 Response: No lakes will be impacted by the proposed subdivision. There will be a proposed bridge constructed across the Big Ditch Canal to complete the NW Maryland Lane connection adjacent to Elena Subdivision. Response 5 reviews the permits required for the bridge across the Big Ditch irrigation canal. 5. Please indicate which of the following water quality permits have been or will be applied for and describe the reasons why these permits are required. Response: A Section 404 Permit with the US Army Corps of Engineers will be required to permit the disturbance of the wetland from the Maryland Lane and Cherry Hills Drive road wetland crossings. Maryland Lane will be extended across the Big Ditch irrigation canal via a bridge to connect to the existing NW Maryland Lane dead end. A 318 Authorization will be completed to account for short-term increases in turbidity and total suspended solids in the Big Ditch from bridge construction. The 318 Authorization is administered by either Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks or the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. B. Ground Water 1. Using available information, provide the estimated seasonal minimum and maximum depth water table, dates on which these depths were determined, and the location and depth of all known aquifers that may be affected by the proposed subdivision. Response: The Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) maintains an interactive map of registered water wells in Montana. The well located near the northern subdivision boundary was completed on October 2, 2003, with a total depth of 40 feet and a static water level of 17.7 feet. The next closest well, located near the southwest corner of the subdivision, was completed on March 3, 1998, with a total depth of 74 feet and a static water level of 22 feet. See Appendix H for Well Logs and Locations. According to the MBMG Groundwater Assessment Atlas No. 3 (2014), the Laurel area is located within an alluvial aquifer. 2. Provide a description of any steps necessary to avoid the degradation of groundwater and groundwater recharge areas. Response: Water will be provided to the subdivision for domestic use and fire protection via the City of Laurel municipal services. Wastewater will be provided by the City of Laurel public wastewater treatment system. C. Geology/Soils/Slopes 1. Using available information locate on a plat or overlay any known geologic hazards affecting the proposed subdivision which could result in property damage or personal injury due to any of the following: rock falls or slides; land, mud or snow slides; high water table, unstable or expansive soil conditions, slopes greater than twenty-five percent. Response: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey was utilized for soil properties within the proposed subdivision. A map of the existing soil map units is provided in Appendix A. The following soil types are located within the project area: Arvada-Bone silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes (Ax), Haverson silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slope (He), and Hydro-Allentine complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes (Hv). See Appendix A for the full NRCS Soil Report. 105 3 of 15 2. Explain the measures that will be taken to prevent or materially lessen the danger of future property damage or injury due to existing geologic hazards. Response: No geologic hazards were identified on the subject property. 3. Provide a statement describing any unusual soil, topographic or geologic conditions on the property, which may limit the capability for construction or excavation using ordinary and reasonable techniques, The statement should address conditions such as shallow bedrock, high water table, unstable or expansive soil conditions, and slope. Describe the location and amount of any cut or fill three or more feet in depth. Where cuts or fills are necessary, describe prevention of erosion and the promotion of re-vegetation, such as replacement of topsoil and grading. Response: The site’s topography includes gentle sloping from 0.5% to 4% grades. A Geotechnical Report for the site performed by Rawhide Engineering determined the site generally consisted of a 1’ thick layer of topsoil over top of 6 to 8.5 feet of lean clay with sand. The lean clay was medium stiffness to soft with a moderate plasticity index. No groundwater nor bedrock was encountered during the test pit exploration in April 2025. Additionally, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology groundwater wells onsite indicate the average depth to ground water is approximately 19.85 feet. Based on the preceding findings, ordinary construction and excavation techniques should be suitable for the site. The Cherry Hill Drive and W Maryland Lane wetland crossings require more than three feet of fill. The road fill slopes will be graded with topsoil, track walked and seeded to re- vegetate the slopes and prevent erosion. 4. Include soil reports obtained from the USDA, Natural Resource and Conservation Service (NRCS) containing the physical properties and engineering indexes for each type of soil, the soil limitations for sanitary facilities, building site development, and water features for each soil type. Describe any special design methods planned to overcome the soil limitations. Response: The NRCS soils report for the project is included in Appendix A. Sanitary facilities will be provided by a public sewer main. No septic drain fields are proposed. Water facilities will be provided by a public water main from the City of Laurel. No individual water wells are proposed. The onsite soil requires a known foundation type and location to enable a geotechnical engineer to provide lot specific geotechnical recommendations prior to the approval of building permits. Any special design methods for building site development will be provided in the geotechnical reports provided for each lot. The geotechnical report provided by Rawhide Engineering recommends minimum compaction of 97% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698 while within asphalt pavement, concrete or building envelope areas. Recommendations for the pavement structural sections as interior streets with 3 inches of asphalt on 6 inches of crushed base course on 8 inches of pit run gravel. Collector road pavement sections were recommended to consist of 4 inches of asphalt on 6 inches of crushed base course on 10 inches of pit run gravel. The geotechnical report is included in the Preliminary Plat Supplemental Documents. D. Vegetation 1. Indicate the distribution of the major vegetation types and identify critical plant communities as identified by the NRCS. Response: The Montana State Digital Library Land Cover Interactive Map shows that the 106 4 of 15 majority of the project area consists of Great Plains Mixed grass Prairie. The Natural Heritage Map Viewer was utilized to identify any state critical plant communities, and none were identified on or near the proposed subdivision property. A wetland delineation was performed on November 4, 2020, and the following information was described in the report. The wetland vegetation was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia, FAC), Nebraska sedge (Carex nebrascensis, OBL), and common cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL). The upland vegetation was dominated by smooth brome (Bromus inermus, UPL), intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium, UPL), curlycup gumweed (Grindelia squarrosa, FACU), and sagebrush (Artemisia ludoviciana, FACU). See figure 5 in the wetland delineation report for data points. The wetland delineation report is included in Appendix I. 2. Describe measures to preserve trees and critical plant communities (e.g., design and location of roads, lots, and open spaces). Response: There will be no impacts to critical plant communities. The proposed subdivision is composed of 48 single family residential lots, roads, and open space. The maximum number of trees and wetlands will be preserved with designated open space. E. Wildlife 1. Describe species of fish and wildlife that inhabit the area affected by the proposed subdivision. Response: There is no aquatic habitat located on the property; therefore, no fish species inhabit the area. An existing subdivision is located to both the east and west of the proposed subdivision. The other surrounding properties are rural with light residential development. 2. Identify on an exhibit map of any known critical or “key” wildlife areas, such as big game winter range, migration routes, waterfowl nesting areas, habitat for rare or endangered species, and wetlands. Response: The US Fish & Wildlife Service provides Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) that searches for species and habitat within a proposed project boundary. A search in IPAC was conducted for the Cherry Hill 4th Filing project. The IPAC search found the following species could potentially be affected by activities at the project location, the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus) that is a proposed threatened species and Suckley's Cuckoo Bumblebee (Bombus suckleyi), which is a proposed endangered species. Neither of the insect species have critical habitat within the project area. The IPAC search did not find any critical habitat within the project area. IPAC also searched for conflicts between the project area and Bald and Golden Eagles. The search found that there have been no eagles observed in the area. Similarly for migratory birds, there is no data showing the project area conflicts with migratory birds. Morrison-Maierle completed a Wildlife Assessment for the proposed subdivision that confirms the property contains no critical wildlife habitat and contains limited habitat value for wildlife. The complete Wildlife Assessment is included in Appendix E. 3. Submit the impacts of the proposed development on fish and wildlife as identified by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Provide a written statement outlining any recommendations of MFWP and any mitigation efforts to mitigate adverse impacts. 107 5 of 15 Response: A wildlife assessment memo and Wildlife Assessment of the Proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision was sent by MMI on May 5, 2025, to MFWP. A response on the potential effects and their recommendations will be provided once received. 16.09.040 – Community Impact Report Contents A. Impact on agriculture and agricultural water use facilities. 1. Describe the number of acres in crop production and whether the property is in whole or in part of a viable farm unit, e.g., was the property under production during the last regular season. Response: A review of aerial photography available on Google Earth Pro dating back to 1985 indicates that the property has not been developed previously. Based on a water right query on the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, no rights were discovered for the parcel (Appendix B). The site is currently vacant land. 2. Describe the uses of land within the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. Response: Land uses within the vicinity of the proposed subdivision include medium density to rural residential and agricultural. 3. Describe existing irrigation rights on the property and whether the rights will be transferred, retained by the original owner, or severed. Response: Based on a water right query on the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, no rights were discovered for the parcel. The parcel is within the place of use for the City of Laurel. A summary is provided as Appendix B. 4. Explain any modification or relocation of ditches or any easements to be provided with the subdivision. The subdivider shall notify the affected ditch company of the subdivision and shall obtain permission to reroute or alter the ditch in any way. Response: The Big Ditch is located to the north and west of the proposed subdivision. Aside from the future bridge that will convey NW Maryland Lane across The Big Ditch, no modification or relocation of ditches is anticipated to occur. There are no existing ditch easements through the development property. Any modification or relocation of ditches located on the property will require permission from the affected ditch company or owner prior to the modification or relocation of the ditch. B. Impact on local services and public health and safety. 1. Water Supply. a. Describe how water will be provided for domestic use and fire protection. Response: Water will be provided to the subdivision for domestic use and fire protection via the City of Laurel municipal services. b. Indicate the number of gallons per day of water the proposed subdivision will require and whether the water supply is sufficient to meet the needs of the anticipated population of the subdivision. Describe any anticipated effects on existing water systems or wells within the area. Response: The Cherry Hill - 4th Filing development includes 48 lots with a single- family house and additional dwelling unit (ADU). Maximum daily demands (MDD) 108 6 of 15 for residential developments were calculated using an average day demand of 130 gpcd. Population estimates were allocated as 2.83 persons per single-family dwelling and 1.5 persons per ADU. A MDD peaking factor of 2.5 was used. Fire flows required by the Standards for low and medium density developments is 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Using the MDD parameters above, the proposed subdivision will require a MDD of 68,148 gpd or 47.3 gpm. Morrison- Maierle provided an onsite fire hydrant flow test on May 8th, 2025, that confirmed the existing water system is sufficient to meet the needs of the Cherry Hill – 4th Filing Subdivision. The fire hydrant flow test is provided in Appendix F. The water demands from the existing subdivisions and Elena Park irrigation were also considered while verifying the existing public water system has capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. The Elena subdivision maximum day demand is 62.7 gpm, Cherry Hill 3rd Filing development added 17.4 gpm and Elena Park irrigation requires 4.52 gpm for a total maximum day demand of 132 gpm from the existing and proposed subdivision. The existing City of Laurel Public Water System supply is sufficient to meet the needs of the existing and proposed subdivision. c. Based on available information, specify whether the proposed water supply satisfies the standards set forth by MDEQ for quality, quantity and construction criteria. Response: Because the subdivision would be connected to the existing City public system, it is assumed that the proposed water supply satisfies the standards set forth by MDEQ for quality and quantity. The design of the water system will adhere to construction criteria set forth by MDEQ. d. If connection to an existing public, community, or shared water system is proposed, identify and describe the existing system and approximate distance to the connection from the proposed subdivision. (1) Provide written evidence that permission to connect to that system has been obtained. Response: A consultation letter was sent by MMI on May 21, 2025, regarding the project. Evidence of written permission to connect to the system will be provided as Appendix G once a response is received. (2) Provide information regarding the capacity of the existing water system and its adequacy for serving the proposed subdivision. Response: The proposed connection point for the system is to the existing 12-inch diameter PVC water main located within Maryland Lane in the southern portion of the subdivision boundary. Improvements proposed for the Cherry Hill Subdivision include installing new 8-inch water mains to provide potable water service and fire suppression. The information in Section “b.” above provides evidence for supply adequacy for serving the proposed subdivision. e. If a new community or shared water system is proposed, identify who will install that system, and how the system will be maintained. 109 7 of 15 Response: A new community or shared water system is not proposed for the Cherry Hill Subdivision 4th Filing. f. If individual water systems are proposed, describe the adequacy of supply of ground water for individual wells or cisterns and the method used to determine adequacy. Response: Individual water systems are not proposed for the Cherry Hill Subdivision 4th Filing. 2. Sewage Disposal. a. Describe the proposed method of sewage disposal. Response: Sewage disposal services will be provided to the subdivision via the City of Laurel municipal services. All sewage waste will be treated by the City of Laurel Wastewater Treatment Plant. b. Indicate the number of gallons of effluent per day that will be generated by the proposed subdivision at full occupancy, whether the proposed method of sewage disposal is sufficient to meet the anticipated needs of the subdivision, and whether it meets the standards of MDEQ. Response: There are 48 lots within the proposed subdivision. Based on an average flow value of 100 gpcd and 2.83 persons per dwelling unit and 1.5 persons per ADU there will be an average day flow of approximately 20,784 gpd (14.43 gpm) generated by the subdivision. Peak flow, assuming a population of 208 people and a peaking factor of 4.1 (DEQ-2 Equation 10-1) is estimated at 59.8 gpm. The subdivision will convey waste to an existing 8” public sewer main located in an existing easement through the southern portion of the property along the proposed extension of Maryland Lane. c. If connection to an existing public sewer system is proposed, provide a description of the system and the approximate distance from the proposed subdivision. Response: Connection will be made to the existing sewer mains that serve the subdivision to the east of the property. The connection to the existing sewer main will occur within an existing easement along the southern portion of the property. (1) Provide written evidence from the appropriate sewer jurisdiction granting permission to connect to that system shall be submitted with the preliminary plat. Response: A consultation letter was sent by MMI on May 21, 2025, regarding the public sewer connection for the project. Evidence of written permission to connect to the system will be provided as Appendix G once a response is received. (2) Provide information regarding the installation, maintenance, and phasing of any proposed public sewage disposal system. Response: Gravity sewer main extensions from existing facilities located along Maryland Lane will be constructed to provide 110 8 of 15 sewage disposal. No phasing or maintenance of these facilities is expected at this time. d. If a new community or shared sewer system is proposed, identify who will install that system, and how the system will be maintained. Response: The proposed subdivision will be connected to an existing sewer main and therefore a new or shared sewer system is not proposed. e. If individual septic systems are proposed, describe the location and specifications of septic systems. Response: The proposed subdivision will be connected to an existing sewer main and therefore individual septic systems are not proposed. 3. Solid Waste Disposal. a. Provide evidence that there is an existing solid waste collection and disposal system available that can accommodate the anticipated additional volume. Response: The City of Laurel Public Works Department provides exclusive solid waste collection services within city limits. b. If no existing collection and disposal system is available, describe the proposed method of solid waste collection and disposal. Response: Solid waste disposal services will be provided by the City of Laurel. c. Describe how the proposed system satisfies the standards set forth by MDEQ. Response: The City of Laurel meets the requirements for solid waste disposal as required by MDEQ. 4. Storm Water. a. Provide calculations indicating how much storm water run-off will be generated as a result of the proposed development. Response: Storm water calculations were performing in accordance with current MDEQ Circular 8 requirements and are provided in Appendix C. b. Provide a description of the proposed storm water collection and drainage systems that satisfy the standards set forth by Section 16.04.070. Response: Storm water collection is proposed via network of street curbs and inlets, conveyed via stormwater piping, and treated using a retention pond. The retention storage facility supplying adequate retention storage for Cherry Hill 4th Filing is located in Utility Lot 1 of the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing development. The existing retention pond was oversized during the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing design to account for the future phase of development. The facilities were designed using MDEQ Circular 8. Maintenance of the retention facility is currently performed by the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 3rd Filing Owner’s Association. 5. Roads. 111 9 of 15 a. Describe any proposed access roads or substantial improvements to existing public or private access roads. Response: Cherry Hill 4th Filing will be accessed by extending existing roads, Cherry Hills Drive and W. Maryland Lane. b. If connections to any existing roads are proposed, identify all access permits that are necessary from the city, county or state. Response: “Public Right of Way Permit” applications from the City of Laurel may be required at the connection points to W. Maryland Lane and Cherry Hills Drive. c. Discuss whether any of the individual lots or tracts have access directly to arterial roads. Response: No lots in within the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing have direct access to arterial roads. Maryland Lane is identified as a collector. d. Explain any proposed closure or modification of existing roads. Response: Road closures are not required. Existing road modifications are not expected. e. Describe provisions considered for dust control on roads. Response: All roads within Cherry Hill 4th Filing will be paved. It is assumed that the City of Laurel will sweep these streets as a part of normal road maintenance. f. Explain how road maintenance will be provided to meet MDEQ guidelines for prevention of water pollution and erosion. Response: Stormwater BMPs will be installed during construction to prevent water pollution and erosion per MDEQ SWPPP requirements. The City of Laurel will maintain roads including cleaning and sweeping as necessary once complete. g. Indicate who will pay the cost of installing and maintaining the roads. Response: The installation cost of the proposed roadways will be paid for by the developer. Road maintenance will be the responsibility of the City of Laurel once roadways are completed and dedicated to the public. h. Discuss how much daily traffic will be generated on existing local and neighborhood roads and main arterials when the subdivision is fully developed. Response: The normal traffic impacts on streets indicate that W. Maryland Lane would see the largest impact, with an estimated 31% increase. NW. Maryland Lane is estimated to have an increased traffic increase of 30%. 8th Avenue is expected to experience an estimated increase in traffic of 16%. W. 12th Street and Cherry Hills Drive will experience the least estimated increase at 14%. i. Indicate the capacity of existing and proposed roads and if they are capable of safely handling the increased traffic resulting from the proposed subdivision. 112 10 of 15 Describe any additional maintenance that will be necessary due to increased traffic and who will pay the cost of maintenance. Response: Per the traffic study, all roads and intersections should be capable of safely handling the increased traffic. Increased traffic should not have an effect on the Level of Service (LOS) for the intersections. j. Indicate ownership of any private access to the subdivision, including private driveway easements. Response: Cherry Hill 4th Filing will be accessed via public rights-of-way. 6. Utilities. a. Indicate which utility companies are proposed to serve the subdivision. Response: Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste will be provided by the City of Laurel. Electricity will be provided by Northwestern Energy. Natural Gas will be provided by Montana-Dakota Utilities Company. Telephone and Cable/Internet services will be provided by Century Link. b. State the method of furnishing electric, natural gas or telephone service, where provided, the extent to which these utilities will be placed underground, and the estimated completion of each utility installation. Response: There are existing electric, natural gas, and telephone services located near the proposed subdivision. These utilities will be installed after the curb and gutter is placed for the proposed roadways. All utilities are estimated to be complete by Spring 2027. c. Indicate if there are any existing utility lines on the property such as transmission lines, pipelines, etc. and if so, describe the impacts they may have on the proposed subdivision. Response: Existing water and sewer utilities are located within an existing utility easement that will become an extension of Maryland Lane, which will be used to provide service for the proposed subdivision. There is existing overhead power located along the south boundary of the property; there is no expected impact on the subdivision. 7. Emergency Services. a. Describe the emergency services available to the subdivision including fire protection, police protection, ambulance, and medical services. Response: According to the Yellowstone County GIS Interactive Mapper and the City of Laurel Website, Cherry Hill Subdivision -4th Filing will be served by Laurel Fire District 7, Laurel Police Department, Laurel Emergency Medical Services, and Intermountain Health Clinic and Advanced Care Hospital of MT (Billings). b. Provide an estimate of the number of responses generated by the subdivision, and the method of determining those numbers. Response: Based on data received from the Laurel Police Department, from May 2020 thru May 2021, there were 2,413 emergency calls received by the department serving a population of 6,834. This equates to a per capita call 113 11 of 15 volume of 0.35 calls/person/year. Assuming 2.83 persons per household and 1.5 persons per ADU among 48 lots, the subdivision would have a population of 208 persons and generate approximately 73 calls per year. c. Describe roads to the subdivision and provide information on compaction standards and widths that satisfy the requirements set forth for emergency vehicle access. Response: Compaction for roadways shall comply with the current edition of Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Road widths will comply with the Subdivision Regulations of the Laurel-Yellowstone City-County Planning Board requirements. d. In the event that the proposed subdivision is located within the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), the subdivider shall submit a plan to mitigate fire hazard in accordance with the fire department having jurisdiction. Response: Cherry Hill Subdivision 4th Filing is not located within the Wildland Urban Interface. e. Describe any health or safety hazards on or near the subdivision, such as mining activity, high pressure gas lines, dilapidated structures or high voltage powerlines. These conditions should be accurately described and their origin and location identified and any proposed mitigation. Response: Buried natural gas and overhead electrical transmission lines exist within the proposed subdivision boundary. Natural gas and overhead power are located along the southern property boundary. Utility locates will be performed during construction. 8. Schools. a. Describe the available educational facilities that would service this subdivision. Response: According to the Yellowstone County GIS website, Cherry Hill 4th Filing is served by Laurel Public Schools. b. Provide an estimate of the number of school children that will be generated from the proposed subdivision and provide the basis for the estimate. Response: A conservative estimate of the number of school age children can be calculated as 50% of the number of homes. With 48 homes, the estimated number of students will be 24 students. Of the 24 students, two-thirds, or 16 students, will be elementary age (K-8) and one-third, or 8 students, will be high school age. c. Provide information regarding whether the increased enrollment can be accommodated by the present personnel, facilities and existing school bus system. This should include any recommendations of the administrator(s) and plans to mitigate adverse impacts of the proposed development on the provision of educational services. Response: A consultation letter was sent by MMI on March 7, 2025, regarding the project. No response yet. The response will be provided once it is received. 114 12 of 15 9. Parks and Recreation Facilities. a. Describe any park and recreation facilities to be provided within the proposed subdivision and other recreational facilities that may serve the subdivision. Response: No park or recreation facilities will be provided within the proposed subdivision. It is assumed that parks near to the subdivision will adequately serve the subdivision. b. State how the required parkland dedication is being satisfied. Response: A cash-in-lieu payment will be provided by the developer to satisfy the parkland requirement. The parkland area requirement was calculated based on 11% of the 10.20 acres of lots and 0.11 acres of Open Space 03 that are parcels less than 0.5 acres. Additionally, 7.5% of the open space 01 area of 0.6 acres, 5% of the Open Space 2 area of 2.4 acres, and 2.5% of the ROW area of 4.43 acres contributed to the total parkland area requirement of 1.44 acres. The cash payment is based on an assumed market value of $10,208 per acre. C. Land Use. 1. Indicate compliance with zoning encompassing all or part of the proposed subdivision. If the proposed subdivision is located near the jurisdictional area of an incorporated city or town, state whether annexation is proposed. Response: According to the City of Laurel Growth Management Plan Existing Land Use Map (2020), the area surrounding the subject property is identified as single household residential and rural residential. Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing will create additional single-family residential lots. 2. Describe how the subdivision will affect access to public lands. Where public lands are adjacent to or near the proposed development, describe present and anticipated uses for those lands. Response: The proposed subdivision will not affect access to public lands. 3. Describe the effect of the subdivision on adjacent land uses. Response: The proposed subdivision will be residential. Cherry Hill 4th Filing will have similar land use to the adjacent lands, both residential areas to the East and West. 4. Describe any on-site or off-site land uses creating a nuisance, such as unpleasant odors, unusual noises, dust or smoke. Response: There are currently no land uses surrounding the proposed subdivision that would create a nuisance. D. Historical Features. Provide a letter from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) indicating whether any historic features such as paleontological, archeological or cultural sites, structures, or objects are present on the subject property. If such features are present, provide a written statement outlining any recommendations of SHPO and any plans for inventory, study, and/or preservation and mitigation for any adverse impacts. Response: A SHPO file search request was sent to the Cultural Records Manager, Damon 115 13 of 15 Murdo, on April 22, 2021, regarding COS 3034 Tract 1, which includes both Cherry Hill 3rd and 4th Filings. Mr. Murdo responded on April 26, 2021, and stated that a cultural resources inventory is unwarranted at this time. He stated that the Big Ditch, which runs north and west of the proposed subdivision boundary, is considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The results of the SHPO file search request and correspondence with Mr. Murdo are located in Appendix J. E. Visual Impact. 1. Describe any efforts to visually blend development activities with natural surroundings. Response: Roads and other facilities will be designed to mimic existing grades. Boulevards will be provided to include green space. 2. If the subdivision is located near the Yellowstone River or the Rimrocks, describe any potential impacts to these natural amenities. Discuss any mitigation efforts to preserve the views. Response: The subdivision is not located near the Yellowstone River or the Rimrocks. 3. Provide information regarding revegetation after construction and any proposed landscaping to be provided along streetscapes. Response: Areas disturbed during construction will be controlled for weeds and re- vegetated following construction. Boulevards will be seeded with grass. 16.09.050 – Summary of Probable Impacts A. Describe the effects the proposed subdivision has on the following: 1. Agriculture; Response: Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing anticipates no impacts to agriculture. 2. Agricultural water user facilities; Response: Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing anticipates no impacts to agricultural water user facilities. 3. Local services; Response: Water, sewer, and solid waste impacts are proposed to increase as a result of the proposed subdivision, all will be provided by the City of Laurel. 4. The natural environment; Response: Natural environmental impacts will be minimized by utilizing public water and sewer services. Stormwater impacts will be minimized by using retention facilities to treat any additional runoff that is generated. 116 14 of 15 5. Wildlife and wildlife habitat; and Response: The subject property contains limited habitat value for wildlife. No Endangered Species Act-listed species or critical habitat was observed during the onsite visit from MMI Environmental Scientists. Several species of concern were documented in the broader area; however, these species are unlikely to occur on the property due to habitat constraints. 6. Public health and safety. Response: Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing anticipates no impacts to public health and safety. 117 15 of 15 References Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). 2024. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG). 2024. Groundwater Information Center (GWIC) Wells Mapper. https://mbmg.mtech.edu/mapper/mapper.asp?view=Wells& Montana State Digital Library (MSDI). 2024. Land Cover. Updated December 2015. http://geoinfo.msl.mt.gov/msdi/land_use_land_cover Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2024. Natural Heritage Map Viewer. http://mtnhp.org/mapviewer/?t=1 Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2024. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024. IPAC Information for Planning and Consultation. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/ N:\6683\001\04 Design\Platting\PreliminaryPlat - 4th Filing\Enviornmental Assessment\Cherry Hill 4th Filing Environmental Assessment_16.09.docx 118 Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 119 © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by haaken syvrud on May/21/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ 2 0 2 5 _ V I C I N I T Y M A P . d w g 6683.001 1 CHERRY HILLS SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA VICINITY MAP BLK KCK MEG 03/2025 PROJECT LOCATION INTERS T A T E 9 0 GO L F C O U R S E R D EAST M A I N S T LAUREL HIGH SCHOOL 8T H A V E N U E 120 Appendix A: NRCS Soil Resource Report Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 121 United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Yellowstone County, Montana Cherry Hills 4th Filing Subdivision Boundary Natural Resources Conservation Service March 3, 2025122 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 123 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 124 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Yellowstone County, Montana.........................................................................13 Ax—Arvada-Bone silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes...........................13 He—Haverson silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes..................................15 Hv—Hydro-Allentine complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes..................................16 References............................................................................................................19 4 125 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 126 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 127 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 128 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 129 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 50 6 0 7 6 0 50 6 0 8 1 0 50 6 0 8 6 0 50 6 0 9 1 0 50 6 0 9 6 0 50 6 1 0 1 0 50 6 1 0 6 0 50 6 0 7 6 0 50 6 0 8 1 0 50 6 0 8 6 0 50 6 0 9 1 0 50 6 0 9 6 0 50 6 1 0 1 0 50 6 1 0 6 0 671460 671510 671560 671610 671660 671710 671760 671810 671860 671910 671960 671510 671560 671610 671660 671710 671760 671810 671860 671910 671960 45° 40' 54'' N 10 8 ° 4 7 ' 5 3 ' ' W 45° 40' 54'' N 10 8 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 ' ' W 45° 40' 44'' N 10 8 ° 4 7 ' 5 3 ' ' W 45° 40' 44'' N 10 8 ° 4 7 ' 3 0 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 30 60 120 180 Meters Map Scale: 1:2,310 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 130 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Yellowstone County, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 23, Aug 28, 2024 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 22, 2021—Oct 4, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 131 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Ax Arvada-Bone silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes 6.9 37.9% He Haverson silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 3.8 21.0% Hv Hydro-Allentine complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes 7.4 41.0% Totals for Area of Interest 18.1 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or Custom Soil Resource Report 11 132 landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 133 Yellowstone County, Montana Ax—Arvada-Bone silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: clq3 Elevation: 2,500 to 4,700 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 115 to 135 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Arvada and similar soils:60 percent Bone and similar soils:30 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Arvada Setting Landform:Terraces, fans Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile E - 0 to 4 inches: loam Btn - 4 to 28 inches: clay Bkny - 28 to 60 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature:0 to 8 inches to natric Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:15 percent Maximum salinity:Moderately saline to strongly saline (8.0 to 16.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:30.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 0.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 7s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: R058AC040MT - Silty (Si) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 134 Description of Bone Setting Landform:Lakebeds (relict), terraces, fans Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile Btk - 0 to 3 inches: silty clay C1 - 3 to 52 inches: silty clay C2 - 52 to 62 inches: stratified loam to clay Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:5 percent Maximum salinity:Strongly saline (16.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:70.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: R058AC050MT - Saline Upland (SU) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Hydro Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Fans, low hills Landform position (two-dimensional):Footslope Landform position (three-dimensional):Base slope Down-slope shape:Linear, concave Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R058AC041MT - Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 14 135 He—Haverson silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: clrk Elevation: 1,900 to 6,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 115 to 135 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Haverson and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Haverson Setting Landform:Flood plains, terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Concave, linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 12 inches: clay loam C - 12 to 68 inches: stratified fine sandy loam to clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:Rare Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:5 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R058AC041MT - Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 15 136 Minor Components Lohmiller Percent of map unit:9 percent Landform:Terraces, flood plains Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear, concave Ecological site:R058AY701MT - Clayey 10-14 Hydric soil rating: No Grail Percent of map unit:6 percent Landform:Hills, terraces, fans Landform position (three-dimensional):Base slope, tread Down-slope shape:Concave, linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R058AC041MT - Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Hv—Hydro-Allentine complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: clrx Elevation: 1,900 to 4,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 11 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 115 to 135 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Hydro and similar soils:60 percent Allentine and similar soils:30 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hydro Setting Landform:Fans, low hills Landform position (two-dimensional):Footslope Landform position (three-dimensional):Base slope Down-slope shape:Linear, concave Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Clayey alluvium Typical profile EB - 0 to 5 inches: clay loam Btn - 5 to 19 inches: clay Bky - 19 to 60 inches: clay loam Custom Soil Resource Report 16 137 Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:15 percent Maximum salinity:Slightly saline to strongly saline (4.0 to 16.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:30.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R058AC041MT - Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Description of Allentine Setting Landform:Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 3 inches: clay Btn - 3 to 13 inches: clay Bkyz - 13 to 32 inches: clay Cr - 32 to 60 inches: bedrock Properties and qualities Slope:2 to 7 percent Depth to restrictive feature:3 to 10 inches to natric; 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:15 percent Maximum salinity:Slightly saline to strongly saline (4.0 to 16.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:30.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 0.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: R058AC041MT - Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Custom Soil Resource Report 17 138 Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Arvada Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Terraces, fans Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R058AC040MT - Silty (Si) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 18 139 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19 140 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 20 141 Appendix B: Water Rights Summary Memo Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 142 Technical Memo To: Kolter Kukes, PE From: Faith Doty, Environmental Scientist Date: June 23, 2025 Job: 6683.001 Re: Cherry Hill Water Rights Memo This memo documents the presence or absence of water rights on a parcel of land in Yellowstone County, Montana. This parcel is legally described as: S08, T02 S, R24 E, C.O.S. 3034, PARCEL 1A, AMD (24) The total area investigated is 18.07 acres. In addition to the desktop assessment, Morrison- Maierle environmental scientists conducted field visits to the subject property on November 4, 2020 and June 12, 2025. The results of our investigation are presented below. A vicinity and aerial map of the investigation areas are attached. Type, Description, Ownership, and User Facilities The following agricultural water facilities are present on, or adjacent to, the subject property: Irrigation ditch lateral: Approximately 860 lineal feet of a man-made channel transects the eastern side of the investigation area before connecting to the Big Ditch canal. The Big Ditch canal borders the investigation area on the west and north sides (see attached map). Big Ditch Canal: A wide irrigation canal borders the property along its west and north sides, flowing generally westward. The canal—commonly referred to as the Big Ditch— originates at the Yellowstone River in Laurel, Montana. It flows through Billings and continues via tunnel beneath the Rimrocks into the Billings Heights, eventually discharging back into the Yellowstone River near Shepherd. The Billings Bench Water Association (BBWA), a nonprofit organization formed in 1915, operates and maintains the canal. The BBWA Canal is the largest in the Billings area and serves as a critical water source for regional agriculture. The system includes a 63-mile main canal and over 200 miles of lateral ditches. It delivers irrigation water to approximately 1,200 users, who also hold shares in the association. Each year, BBWA initiates canal flow around April 15 and shuts it off around October 15. Flow rates typically range from 200 to 600 cubic feet per second. The system provides irrigation water to approximately 18,000 acres of agricultural land and also supplies water to golf courses, public parks, and private lawns. 143 Cherry Hill Agricultural Water User Facilities Memo The Yellowstone County Irrigated Area Maps from 1943 show that the subject property was partially irrigated by the Big Ditch at the time of publication. An annotated copy of the map showing the subject property is attached, and also shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Water Resources Survey for Gallatin County, MT, 1953 The Big Ditch Canal functions solely as an irrigation feature and is not considered a perennial stream. In a June 5, 2025 email, the Yellowstone Conservation District confirmed that it does not assert jurisdiction over irrigation ditches, canals, or drainage ditches—including the Big Ditch Canal. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) stated in an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) letter on July 13, 2021 that the irrigation ditch that transects the property is not a regulated water of the United States and is therefore out of their jurisdiction. The AJD is attached to this memo. Water Rights The Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) manages the state’s Water Rights Query System. In June 2025, Morrison-Maierle used the database to evaluate whether any water rights are associated with the subject property. A geocode-based search (03-0821-08-2-40-01-0000) returned no results for either a point of diversion or a place of use located on the property. To supplement this query, we conducted a 144 Cherry Hill Agricultural Water User Facilities Memo location-based search using the property’s Section, Township, and Range (T2S, R24E, Section 8) to identify any existing water rights within the surrounding area. This broader search yielded 66 water rights, summarized in Table 1. However, none of these records identify the subject property as a place of use. Based on this result, we interpret that the documented rights belong to other landowners within the same section. The absence of parcel- specific water rights suggests that the property historically received water through shared use of irrigation ditch rights, rather than holding an independent water right. No private or sole-source water rights are currently recorded for the parcel. Table 1. Water Right Query Results for Cherry Hill Water Right Status Source Purpose Owner 43QJ 208 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CATHERINE W TOOLEY; CREATH A TOOLEY 43QJ 4261 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC H R OXYGEN SUPPLY INC 43QJ 6132 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC RACHEL LESNIK; THADDEUS LESNIK 43QJ 11628 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC KENNETH HELMAN; SANDRA E HELMAN 43QJ 12501 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; STOCK ALICIA M ANDERSON; TRAVIS R ANDERSON 43QJ 16610 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC RICHARD BLASKOVICH; SUSAN BLASKOVICH 43QJ 15920 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CONWAY, DENNIS AND SANDRA TRUSTEES 43QJ 22305 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC KURT N JOHNSON 43QJ 25057 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC DAVID M YAKES; DAYNA M YAKES 43QJ 54036 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST #7 43QJ 64401 00 Active GROUNDWATER IRRIGATION TERRIE A CASEY; TIMOTHY J CASEY 43QJ 64421 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC RAGLAND FARMS INC 43QJ 80814 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN HEIDI MATELICH; NATHAN MATELICH 43QJ 88848 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN ROY K THURMAN; SUSAN E THURMAN 43QJ 94794 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN LAUREN E ROGERS; SELWYN P ROGERS 43QJ 101407 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN CYNTHIA M RIESINGER; JERRY RIESINGER 43Q 107025 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC GARY KENNEDY; MARTHA KENNEDY 43Q 111870 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN BRIDGET S MENNIE; KELLY L MENNIE 43Q 112008 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CORTNEY G RUTH 43Q 116124 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN THOMAS S MONTGOMERY 43Q 116156 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CHRISTINE N HOFSCHULTE; KENNETH J HOFSCHULTE 145 Cherry Hill Agricultural Water User Facilities Memo Water Right Status Source Purpose Owner 43Q 116165 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN ANTHONY ROBERG 43Q 116166 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC KATHLEEN A FURROW 43Q 115320 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN LAURA DIETZ; PHILLIP DIETZ 43Q 116235 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN CURTIS L ANDERSON; GERALDINE K ANDERSON 43QJ 28069 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC TJ SKE LLC 43Q 113537 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN MITCH WARDELL 43QJ 30004989 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN JANEL I ALLISON; MARK D ALLISON 43QJ 30007337 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC NATALIE CHANEY; NICHOLAS M CHANEY 43QJ 30006537 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; STOCK GRACE FRAZIER; GRANT FRAZIER 43QJ 30007409 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN TERRY L RUFF 43Q 30007775 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN BRENDA L YOUNKIN 43QJ 38235 00 Active YELLOWSTONE RIVER STOCK BIG DITCH CO INC; HIGH DITCH CO INC 43Q 30011001 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC SARAH L HARRIS 43Q 30012064 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC ROSS V KING 43Q 30012754 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC JEAN M KERR 43QJ 30006508 Active UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOWSTONE RIVER IRRIGATION GRACE FRAZIER; GRANT FRAZIER 43QJ 30007499 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN JODY BOHAN; MARK BOHAN 43Q 30014994 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN SIERRA L HARBISON; LEIF A RIESINGER 43QJ 772 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CLYDE A BRAY 43QJ 14502 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC JEROLD CANTRELL; JUANITA CANTRELL 43QJ 10198 00 Active YELLOWSTONE RIVER IRRIGATION BIG DITCH CO INC; HIGH DITCH CO INC 43QJ 21608 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC LES L MASSAD 43QJ 70815 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC CASEY MEIER; TIFFANY MEIER 43QJ 117626 00 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN WENDY CATHLEEN MEANS 43QJ 26376 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC KENNETH J SHERMAN; ROSALINA J SHERMAN 43QJ 62414 00 Active UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOWSTONE RIVER LAWN AND GARDEN JOHN MARSTAELLER 43Q 30011824 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC RANDY M MAYES 43Q 30000645 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN BARBARA J JOHNSON; MERTON O JOHNSON 146 Cherry Hill Agricultural Water User Facilities Memo Water Right Status Source Purpose Owner 43Q 30022253 Active GROUNDWATER IRRIGATION LEONARD A COOK; AMANDA N VICK 43Q 30017826 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC APRIL BONHAM; KENNETH BONHAM 43QJ 30022859 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC JACKIE L BRILZ 43QJ 30025001 Active UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOWSTONE RIVER LAWN AND GARDEN DAVID GIGOUX 43QJ 30050849 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN WEST CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAS WITNESSES 43QJ 30050825 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN COREEN TOMEK; JOHN J TOMEK 43Q 30072162 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN DANIEL J KLEIN 43Q 30070469 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN JEFFREY L KOGELMANN; TIFFANY G KOGELMANN 43QJ 30107789 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN DON RUSSELL; LISA RUSSELL 43Q 45730 00 Active YELLOWSTONE RIVER MUNICIPAL LAUREL, CITY OF 43QJ 30112847 Active GROUNDWATER LAWN AND GARDEN TJ SKE LLC 43QJ 30134092 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC; LAWN AND GARDEN; STOCK DENNIS ALLWIN; GLORIA ALLWIN 43QJ 6531 00 Active GROUNDWATER DOMESTIC ANTHONY R URQUIDI; KATHERINE V URQUIDI 43QJ 45735 00 Active YELLOWSTONE RIVER STOCK COVE IRRIGATION CO 43QJ 6530 00 Active SPRING, UNNAMED TRIBUTARY OF YELLOWSTONE RIVER STOCK ANTHONY R URQUIDI; KATHERINE V URQUIDI 43QJ 19149 00 Active YELLOWSTONE RIVER IRRIGATION COVE IRRIGATION CO 43QJ 30163821 Active GROUNDWATER IRRIGATION; DOMESTIC BAILEY DEMPSTER; JAY D DEMPSTER Note: Because the water rights query search was completed using the Township/Range/Section of the subject property, some of the water rights in Table 1 may be for adjacent properties. 147 Cherry Hill Agricultural Water User Facilities Memo References Montana Department of Natural Resources (DNRC). 2025. Water Right Query System. Accessed June 23, 2025. http://wrqs.dnrc.mt.gov/ Montana State Engineer Office (1943). Maps Showing the Irrigated Area in Yellowstone County by Source of Supply. Accessed June 23, 2025. https://dnrc.mt.gov/Water- Resources/Water-Rights/Understanding-Water-Rights/Water-Resource-Survey-Books "Some History". Billings Bench Water Association. Retrieved 17 May 2025. Olson, John L.; Reiten, Jon C. (2002). "Hydrogeology of the West Billings Area: Impacts of Land- Use Changes on Water Resources" (PDF). Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. p. 11. Retrieved 17 May 2025. 148 149 150 !(!( !(!( MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2021 N:\6683\001\GIS\Fig 5_WD Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 6683.001 5 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 6/29/2021 Legend Project Area Wetland (3.26 acres) Ditch !(Data Point ±0 300 600150 Feet WETLAND DELINEATION MAP Cherry Hills Subdivision Wetland Delineation YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE:  UDP 1 WDP 1 WDP 2 UDP 2 Headgate 860 LF Irrigation Ditch 151 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT HELENA REGULATORY OFFICE 10 WEST 15TH STREET, SUITE 2200 HELENA, MONTANA 59626 -9705 July 13, 2021 SUBJECT: Approved Jurisdictional Determination - Cherry Hills Subdivision; USACE No. NWO-2021-00433-MTB Morrison-Maierle Attn: Ms. Christine Pearcy 2880 Technology Boulevard W. Bozeman, Montana 59718 Dear Ms. Pearcy: We are responding to your request for an approved jurisdictional determination regarding the above-referenced project. The approximate 25-acre project site is located at Latitude 45.680435°, Longitude -108.794173°, within Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East, Laurel, Yellowstone County , Montana. Based on available information, an on-site approved jurisdictional determination has been completed for the areas identified in your request and is enclosed for your information. We concur with the estimate of aquatic resources, as depicted on the enclosed map, dated June 29, 2021, entitled Wetland Delineation Map, prepared by Morrison-Maierle. Approximately 3.26 acres of Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (Wetland 1) and approximately 860 linear feet (LF) an irrigation ditch are present within the survey area. Wetland 1 is regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), since Wetland 1 is a slope wetland that abuts an a(2) water that flows directly into the Yellowstone River. The 860 LF of Irrigation Ditch is excluded as a b(5) water as the ditch does not relocate a tributary and was not constructed in a tributary or otherwise adjacent wetland. Thus, the irrigation ditch depicted on the attached map, is not a regulated water of the United States. This letter contains an approved jurisdictional determination for your subject site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under USACE regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) and Request for Appeal (RFA) form is enclosed. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the Northwestern Division Office, Regulatory Appeals Review Officer, Melinda Larsen at Melinda.M.Larsen@usace.army.mil. For any questions you may contact her at (503) 808-3888. In order for an RFA to be accepted by USACE, it must be determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 C.F.R. part 331.5, and that it has 152 -2- been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 60 days from the date of this letter. It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this letter. This determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps of Engineers' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. This determination may not be valid for the wetland conser vation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are U .S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service prior to starting work. This determination is valid for five (5) years from the date of this letter, unless new information warrants revision of the determination before the expiration date. Please refer to identification number NWO -2021-00433-MTB in any correspondence concerning this project. If you hav e any questions, please contact Mr. Swade Hammond by email at swade.d.hammond@usace.army.mil or by telephone at 701-715-3179. Sincerely, Sage L. Joyce Montana Section Chief 2 Enclosures: 1. Notification of Administrative Appeal Options & Process Request for Appeal (NAP/RFA) 2. Delineation Map 153 Appendix C: Draft Stormwater Calculations Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 154 Cherry Hill 4th Filing – Preliminary Drainage Report Pre-Development Conditions: The Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision in Laurel, Montana is located between the Elena and Cherry Hill 3rd Filing Subdivisions. The drainage basin analyzed for the subdivision is 18.07 acres and located on Tract 1A of COS 3034. Surrounding the northern proposed subdivision boundary is the Big Ditch irrigation lateral that serves as a boundary preventing offsite stormwater runoff from entering the project site. The drainage basin is currently vacant land consisting of short grass pasture and with a moderate number of trees. The existing drainage pattern generally flows to the central wetland that conveys water through the south property boundary at a grade of approximately 1% or less. The subdivision is not within the FEMA floodway or 100-year floodplain. A pre-development stormwater exhibit is attached that provides an aerial image and display of the pre-development drainage patterns. Post-development Conditions: The existing land is vacant; the proposed development plan will extend the existing residential roads to serve medium density single family residential lots that will meet the City of Laurel Residential – 7500 zoning requirements. As part of the development improvements, W. Maryland Lane will be extended to provide a critical local connection for residents, emergency services, recreation access and nearby businesses. The proposed development will not make changes to floodplains, however, will contribute drainage to the existing stormwater retention pond within Utility Lot 1 of the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing Subdivision. The design for the existing storage pond over- sized the storage volume in anticipation of providing retention storage for the future Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision. The proposed subdivision will convey post-development drainage through a network of storm drain inlets and storm drain piping to the existing storage pond. Two 18-inch culverts will be installed to maintain the existing drainage pattern flowing south along the center of the subdivision by piping water below Cherry Hills Drive and W. Maryland Lane. Drainage Analysis Methods: Storm analysis for the project included 2, 10 and 100-year storm events. Hydrologic methods were completed in accordance with COL Standards and Montana Department of Environmental Quality Circular 8 (DEQ-8). The 2-year 24-hour precipitation depth of 1.57 inches from COL Standards Table 8.3 was employed to determine the preliminary retention storage requirement. Runoff coefficients for the pre- and post-development conditions were selected from Table 8.8 in the COL Standards and used in the DEQ-8 Standard Plan spreadsheet to find the required retention storage volume. The 10 and 100-year storms were analyzed using the Rational Method to ensure the 18-inch culvert size is adequate to properly convey the 100-year storm runoff. Time of concentration calculations were found using the TR-55 Method. The culvert calculations were completed in Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk Civil 3D by Autodesk, Inc and are attached to this report. The hydraulic Analysis for the network of storm drain inlets and piping was completed using Storm and Sanitary Sewer Analysis (SSA) for Autodesk Civil 3D by Autodesk, Inc. All hydraulic analysis techniques were completed in accordance with COL Standards and DEQ-8. Gutter flow was analyzed to ensure compliance with allowable flow spread in accordance with Table 8.9 of the COL Standards. 155 Pre-development Hydraulic Analysis: Pre-development runoff was calculated by evaluating the entire subdivision basin of 18.07 acres. The runoff coefficient used for the predevelopment condition was 0.2 (unimproved land). The pre- development runoff volume for a 2-year 24-hour storm event has been calculated to be 20,597 cubic feet of stormwater. Post-development Drainage System: As discussed previously, the existing drainage conditions drain runoff to the central drainage channel then directly south before exiting the southern subdivision boundary. Storm water collection for the subdivision is proposed via a network of street curbs and inlets, conveyed via stormwater piping, and treated using a retention pond. The retention facility was constructed during the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing and was oversized by 30,844 cubic feet to provide storage for the proposed Cherry Hill 4th Filing. The inlets and piping in the northern portion of the subdivision within Cherry Hills drive will collect and convey storm water through 12” PVC piping before transitioning to 18” PVC piping as stormwater is conveyed to the Cherry Hills Drive and Sophia Lane intersection. Drainage then flows south along Sophia Lane to the intersection of W. Maryland Lane. Then the drainage is piped east and will connect to existing storm drain piping installed during the Cherry Hill 3rd Filing that will convey water to the existing stormwater retention Pond in Utility Lot 1 of the 3rd Filing. Similarly, storm drain inlets located in the south-west portion of Cherry Hills Drive will capture stormwater and will drain east along W. Maryland Lane until reaching the existing storm piping connection that travels to the existing pond. The attached Stormwater Layout Exhibit displays the overall post-development drainage system. The Big Ditch irrigation lateral provides a raised bank that serves as a barrier from offsite runoff entering the project site. There have been no reported issues of the Big Ditch irrigation lateral flooding into the existing Elena subdivision that is adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Therefore, offsite runoff is not a concern. A Geotechnical Report has been completed for this project. The finish grading will direct drainage away from single family dwellings and will be re-seeded post construction to reduce erosion. Retention Storage Calculation: The DEQ-8 standard plan spreadsheet was used to establish a preliminary retention storage volume for the subdivision. It was calculated that the total area of 18.07 acres would comprise approximately 3.34 acres of paved roadways, concrete curbs and sidewalks, 10.20 acres of single-family lots, a conservative lawn/landscaping area estimate of 2 acres that is less than 20% of the lot surface areas and 2.53 acres of unimproved area. Using these estimated areas, a weighted C coefficient of 0.50 was calculated. A post-development runoff volume of 50,945 cubic feet (CF) was calculated using the design storm depth of 1.57 inches and a weighted C value of 0.50. Per DEQ-8, the volume required to be retained onsite is either the difference between the pre-development and post-development volumes or the first 0.5 inch of runoff from the impervious area, whichever is greater. Since the first 0.5 inch of precipitation amounts to 15,318 CF, it is required to treat the total difference of the design storm event. The required retention volume for the proposed subdivision is 30,575 CF. The existing pond was oversized to provide an adequate 30,844 CF of storage for the Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision. Summary: The existing site drains water to the center of the subdivision open space then south until exiting the southern property boundary. The subdivision open space will preserve the existing wetland and mimic the existing drainage pattern by implementing two culverts that will allow stormwater drainage to pass below the roads and travel along the existing drainage pattern and exit the southern property boundary. The proposed subdivision roads will be equipped with storm drain inlets, and storm drainage piping network that collects and conveys runoff from impervious surfaces to the existing stormwater retention pond within Cherry Hill Subdivision 3rd Filing. The existing storage pond had been oversized to meet the storage requirement of the proposed 156 subdivision with an excess of 269 CF. The existing retention pond is equipped with a gravel sub- surface infiltration system that directs water to a lift station that pumps and discharges the retained water into the Big Ditch irrigation lateral. The Cherry Hill 3rd Filling Subdivision solidified an agreement with the Big Ditch irrigation lateral operators that allows the existing stormwater pond to discharge into the Big Ditch irrigation lateral. All finish grading will be re-seeded post construction, and graded to drain runoff away from structures. Best management stormwater practices in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan permit will be implemented and maintained throughout construction. All stormwater infrastructure for the Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision will be designed in accordance with the COL Standards and DEQ-8. 157 [][][][][][][][][][][] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] GV T 336 0 33 6 5 33 7 0 33 7 0 337 0 337 5 337 5 3375 3365 33 7 0 3370 3370 3375 33 6 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by haaken syvrud on Jun/16/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ P R E - D E V E L O P E M E N T S T O R M W A T E R . d w g 6683.001 1/2 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER EXHIBIT HPS KCK MEG 6/2025 50 10025500 SCALE IN FEET STORMWATER DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY LEGEND >PRE-DEVELOPMENT FLOW PATH EXISTING GRADE MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING GRADE MINOR CONTOUR BIG D I T C H IRRI G A T I O N L A T E R A L WETLANDS (TYP.) 158 BLOCK 10 LOT 8 0.24 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 17 BLOCK 10 LOT 16 BLOCK 10 LOT 15 BLOCK 10 LOT 14 BLOCK 10 LOT 13 BLOCK 10 LOT 12 BLOCK 10 LOT 11 BLOCK 10 LOT 10 BLOCK 10 LOT 9 BLOCK 10 LOT 8 BLOCK 10 LOT 7 BLOCK 10 LOT 3 BLOCK 10 LOT 17 0.23 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 16 0.29 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 15 0.18 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 14 0.17 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 13 0.17 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 12 0.17 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 11 0.17 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 10 0.17 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 9 0.20 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 7 0.30 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 3 0.21 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 5 BLOCK 9 LOT 4 BLOCK 9 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 5 0.20 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 4 0.22 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 3 0.18 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 2 BLOCK 6 LOT 3 BLOCK 6 LOT 4 BLOCK 6 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 LOT 6 BLOCK 6 LOT 7 BLOCK 6 LOT 8 BLOCK 7 LOT 2 BLOCK 7 LOT 3 BLOCK 7 LOT 4 BLOCK 7 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 LOT 2 0.23 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 3 0.24 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 4 0.21 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 5 0.17 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 6 0.17 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 7 0.18 acs. BLOCK 6 LOT 8 0.17 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 1 0.23 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 2 0.19 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 3 0.19 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 4 0.18 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 5 0.19 acs. O.S. 03O.S. 03 0.44 acs. BLOCK 7 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 0.31 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 18 0.27 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 18 BLOCK 8 LOT 2 BLOCK 8 LOT 1 BLOCK 8 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 2 BLOCK 9 LOT 1 BLOCK 9 LOT 10 BLOCK 9 LOT 9 BLOCK 9 LOT 8 BLOCK 9 LOT 7 BLOCK 9 LOT 6 BLOCK 9 LOT 5 0.20 acs.BLOCK 8 LOT 2 0.21 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 1 0.22 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 3 0.19 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 2 0.19 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 1 0.21 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 10 0.21 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 9 0.22 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 8 0.27 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 7 0.23 acs. BLOCK 9 LOT 6 0.23 acs. O.S. 02O.S. 02 2.40 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 BLOCK 8 LOT 5 BLOCK 8 LOT 4 BLOCK 8 LOT 4 0.19 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 5 0.21 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 0.27 acs. O.S. 01 BLOCK 10 LOT 6 BLOCK 10 LOT 5 BLOCK 10 LOT 4 BLOCK 10 LOT 2 BLOCK 10 LOT 1 BLOCK 10 LOT 6 0.27 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 5 0.24 acs.BLOCK 10 LOT 4 0.21 acs. BLOCK 10 LOT 2 0.19 acs.BLOCK 10 LOT 1 0.18 acs. O.S. 01 0.60 acs. BLOCK 8 LOT 6 BLOCK 8 LOT 6 0.23 acs. SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD T TT 6 S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D > > > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > >> 3 3 7 5 33 7 0 3365 3 3 7 0 3370 33 7 0 FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by haaken syvrud on Jun/16/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S T O R M W A T E R L A Y O U T . d w g 6683.001 2/2 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA STORMWATER LAYOUT EXHIBIT HPS KCK MEG 6/2025 60 12030600 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND STORM SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AREAS TOTAL AREA OF 4TH FILING TOTAL AREA OF LOTS 18.07 AC 10.20 AC 8.44 AC TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREAS 2.00 AC LAWN/ LANDSCAPING OF LOTS SD STORMWATER DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY W. MARYLAND LN. CHER R Y H I L L S D R . NW. MA R Y L A N D L N . SO P H I A L N . EXST STORMWATER RETENTION POND TOTAL VOLUME = 47,135 CF EXST STORAGE REQUIREMENT= 16,291 CF PROPOSED ADDITIONAL STORAGE REQUIREMENT = 30,575 CF TOTAL STORAGE REQUIREMENT = 46,866 CF STORM SEWER FLOW DIRECTION> PRELIMINARY FINISH GRADE CONTOUR (TYP) EXST STORMWATER WET WELL PUMPING STATION EXST STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO THE BIG DITCH LATERAL BIG D I T C H IRRI G A T I O N L A T E R A L PROPOSED CULVERT 1 PROPOSED CULVERT 2 WETLANDS (TYP.) 159 Sudivision Name EQ# County Yellowstone County 0.95 Location City of Laurel 0.8 Lot/Area No.Subdivision Boundary 0.5 0.1 0.2 Intensity Values Q=C*i*A 2-year, Tc inches/hour 2-year, 24-hour 1.57 inches 10-year, Tc inches/hour 100-year, Tc inches/hour 100-year, 24-hour inches Total Area/Lot Size 18.07 acres = 787129.2 ft2 Initial Stormwater Facility Volume (0.5" x Impervious Area) =15318 ft3 Paved/hard surface areas 0 acres ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Single-family Areas 0 acres ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Lawn/Landscaping 0 acres ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Unimproved Area 18.07 acres 787129.2 ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 20596.547 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Total 18.07 acres 787129.2 ft2 QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec VTotal=20596.547 ft3 QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec VTotal=0.000 ft3 Paved/hard surface areas 3.339807163 acres 145482 ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 18082.200 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Single-family Areas 10.2 acres 444312 ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 29065.410 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Lawn/Landscaping 2 acres 87120 ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 1139.820 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Unimproved Area 2.530192837 acres 110215.2 ft2 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 2883.964 ft3 Q= 0.000 ft3/sec Q= 0.000 ft3/sec V= 0.000 ft3 Total 18.07 acres 787129.2 ft2 QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec VTotal=51171.395 ft3 QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec QTotal=0.000 ft3/sec VTotal=0.000 ft3 ΔQ=0.000 ft3/sec ΔV=30574.847 ft3 ΔQ=0.000 ft3/sec ΔQ=0.000 ft3/sec ΔV=0.000 ft3 30575 ft3 = input field Pre-Development Characteristics Post-Development Characteristics 2-year, Tc (flow rate) 2-year, Tc Required Minimum Facility Volume: Appendix G: Standard Storm Drainage Plan 100-year, Tc (flow rate)(volume) 2-year, 24-hour 10-year, Tc (flow rate) Cherry Hill 4th Filing Subdivision Rational Method Co-Efficients (C) Paved/hard surfaces Gravel surfaces Single-family Areas Unimproved areas Lawn/landscaping Runoff Flow/Volume Change 2-year, 24-hour 100-year, Tc (flow rate) volume)(flow rate) 10-year, Tc (flow rate) 100-year, 24-hour (volume) 100-year, 24-hour (volume) 160 Hydrology Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill 4th Filing - Culvert 1 (north culvert) Basin Hydrology Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge (cfs) = 0.776 Storm frequency (yrs) = 10 Time interval (min) = 1 Drainage area (ac) = 0.790 Runoff coeff. (C) = 0.2 Rainfall Inten (in/hr) = 4.912 Tc by User (min) = 5 IDF Curve = Cherry Hill 4th Filing_IDF.IDF Rec limb factor = 1.00 Hydrograph Volume = 233 (cuft); 0.005 (acft) 0 5 10 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) Runoff Hydrograph 10-yr frequency Runoff Hyd - Qp = 0.78 (cfs) 161 Hydrology Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill 4th Filing - Culvert 1 (north culvert) Basin Hydrology Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge (cfs) = 1.266 Storm frequency (yrs) = 100 Time interval (min) = 1 Drainage area (ac) = 0.790 Runoff coeff. (C) = 0.2 Rainfall Inten (in/hr) = 8.010 Tc by User (min) = 5 IDF Curve = Cherry Hill 4th Filing_IDF.IDF Rec limb factor = 1.00 Hydrograph Volume = 380 (cuft); 0.009 (acft) 0 5 10 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) Runoff Hydrograph 100-yr frequency Runoff Hyd - Qp = 1.27 (cfs) 162 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill - 4th Filing_Culvert 1 (North)_10 YR Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 3363.10 Pipe Length (ft) = 103.00 Slope (%) = 1.00 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 3364.13 Rise (in) = 18.0 Shape = Circular Span (in) = 18.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe Culvert Entrance = Headwall Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0078, 2, 0.0379, 0.69, 0.5 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 3370.00 Top Width (ft) = 37.00 Crest Width (ft) = 0.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs) = 0.78 Qmax (cfs) = 0.78 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs) = 0.78 Qpipe (cfs) = 0.78 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 0.69 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 2.73 HGL Dn (ft) = 3364.01 HGL Up (ft) = 3364.46 Hw Elev (ft) = 3364.57 Hw/D (ft) = 0.29 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 163 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill - 4th Filing_Culvert 1 (North)_100 YR Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 3363.10 Pipe Length (ft) = 103.00 Slope (%) = 1.00 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 3364.13 Rise (in) = 18.0 Shape = Circular Span (in) = 18.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe Culvert Entrance = Headwall Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0078, 2, 0.0379, 0.69, 0.5 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 3370.00 Top Width (ft) = 37.00 Crest Width (ft) = 0.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs) = 1.27 Qmax (cfs) = 1.27 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs) = 1.27 Qpipe (cfs) = 1.27 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 1.06 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.12 HGL Dn (ft) = 3364.06 HGL Up (ft) = 3364.55 Hw Elev (ft) = 3364.70 Hw/D (ft) = 0.38 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 164 Hydrology Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill 4th Filing - Culvert 2 (South Culvert) Basin Hydrology Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge (cfs) = 3.476 Storm frequency (yrs) = 10 Time interval (min) = 1 Drainage area (ac) = 4.270 Runoff coeff. (C) = 0.2 Rainfall Inten (in/hr) = 4.070 Tc by TR55 (min) = 9 IDF Curve = Cherry Hill 4th Filing_IDF.IDF Rec limb factor = 1.00 Hydrograph Volume = 1,877 (cuft); 0.043 (acft) 0 5 10 15 20 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) Runoff Hydrograph 10-yr frequency Runoff Hyd - Qp = 3.48 (cfs) 165 Hydrology Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill 4th Filing - Culvert 2 (South Culvert) Basin Hydrology Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge (cfs) = 5.668 Storm frequency (yrs) = 100 Time interval (min) = 1 Drainage area (ac) = 4.270 Runoff coeff. (C) = 0.2 Rainfall Inten (in/hr) = 6.637 Tc by TR55 (min) = 9 IDF Curve = Cherry Hill 4th Filing_IDF.IDF Rec limb factor = 1.00 Hydrograph Volume = 3,061 (cuft); 0.070 (acft) 0 5 10 15 20 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) Runoff Hydrograph 100-yr frequency Runoff Hyd - Qp = 5.67 (cfs) 166 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill - 4th Filing_Culvert 2 (South)_10 YR Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 3357.50 Pipe Length (ft) = 116.00 Slope (%) = 1.22 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 3358.91 Rise (in) = 18.0 Shape = Circular Span (in) = 18.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe Culvert Entrance = Headwall Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0078, 2, 0.0379, 0.69, 0.5 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 3364.00 Top Width (ft) = 49.00 Crest Width (ft) = 0.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs) = 3.50 Qmax (cfs) = 3.50 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs) = 3.50 Qpipe (cfs) = 3.50 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 2.50 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 4.23 HGL Dn (ft) = 3358.61 HGL Up (ft) = 3359.62 Hw Elev (ft) = 3359.92 Hw/D (ft) = 0.67 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 167 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, May 7 2025 Cherry Hill - 4th Filing_Culvert 2 (South)_100 YR Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 3357.50 Pipe Length (ft) = 116.00 Slope (%) = 1.22 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 3358.91 Rise (in) = 18.0 Shape = Circular Span (in) = 18.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe Culvert Entrance = Headwall Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0078, 2, 0.0379, 0.69, 0.5 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 3364.00 Top Width (ft) = 49.00 Crest Width (ft) = 0.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs) = 5.67 Qmax (cfs) = 5.67 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs) = 5.67 Qpipe (cfs) = 5.67 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 3.71 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 5.00 HGL Dn (ft) = 3358.71 HGL Up (ft) = 3359.83 Hw Elev (ft) = 3360.29 Hw/D (ft) = 0.92 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 168 Appendix D: Agency Responses Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 169 March 7, 2025 Laurel Public Schools 410 Colorado Avenue Laurel, MT 59044 Re: Cherry Hills Subdivision – 4th Filing MMI# 6683.001 To Whom It May Concern: As a part of the subdivision application process, we are soliciting your comments regarding a proposed major subdivision northwest of the city center in Laurel, Montana. The objective is to subdivide Tract 1A of C.O.S. 3034 (amendment of Tract 1), an 18.07-acre parcel, into 47 single family, residential lots with several open space tracts. The proposed configuration and location of these lots is illustrated on the enclosed Concept Plan and Vicinity Map. The proposed subdivision is projected to increase the enrollment of Laurel Public Schools (South Elementary, West Elementary, Graff Elementary, Laurel Middle School, and Laurel High School), thereby impacting the services of the present personnel, facilities, school bus system, etc. We would be happy to provide any further information, if needed. Please feel free to contact me at (406) 371-6052 or kkukes@m-m.net. Sincerely, _____________________________ Kolter Kukes, P.E. Civil Engineer Enclosure cc: MMI File 170 May 5, 2025 Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Submitted via email: fwpcomments@mt.gov Subject: Request for Comment – Proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing MM Project No. 6683.001 | Laurel, MT To Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, On behalf of our client, Morrison-Maierle requests Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) review and comments on the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision, 4th Filing, located in Laurel, Montana. Enclosed for your consideration are a conceptual site plan and a wildlife and habitat assessment memo prepared in accordance with the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Recommendations for Subdivision Development in Montana (2012). The proposed subdivision will develop a currently vacant parcel that is bordered by existing residential neighborhoods. As part of the proposed improvements, Maryland Lane will be extended to provide a critical local connection for residents, emergency services, recreation access, and nearby businesses. The project is currently in the review stage. If approved, construction will be completed in compliance with all applicable regulations and best management practices. Prior to ground disturbance, a Joint Application will be submitted for review by the appropriate agencies. Anticipated wildlife and habitat related permits include: • Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • 310 Permit from the Yellowstone Conservation District • 318 Authorization from Montana FWP This packet includes the Wildlife Memo, conceptual development plan, and other supporting documentation. Please review the enclosed application at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions regarding the information provided, please contact me at (406) 922-6772 or fdoty@m-m.net. Sincerely, _________________________ Faith C. Doty, PWS Environmental Scientist CC: India Rhinehardt, Environmental Scientist Kolter Kukes, PE Haaken Syvrud, EI 171 Appendix E: Wildlife Assessment Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 172 1 | Page Technical Memo To: Kolter Kukes, PE, Nic Amestoy From: India Rhinehardt, Environmental Scientist, Faith Doty, Environmental Scientist, Date: May 2, 2025 Job: 6683.001 Re: Wildlife Assessment of the Proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision This memo documents the presence or absence of wildlife resources and US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered Species Act (ESA) federally listed species on a parcel of land in Yellowstone County, Montana. This parcel is legally described as: S08, T02 S, R24 E, C.O.S. 3034, PARCEL 1A, AMD (24) The total area investigated is 18.07 acres. A vicinity, topographic, and aerial map of the investigation areas are attached to this memo. A field visit to the subject property was conducted by a Morrison-Maierle Environmental Scientist on November 4, 2020. The results of the data investigation and field visit are presented below. A vicinity map is included as figure 1 of this memo. Data from the Montana Natural Heritage Program: The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MNHP) collects and manages data on species occurrences, biological communities, and habitat across the state. Data is aggregated into a model and customized reports for a specified project area are provided from the MNHP upon request. For these reports, the project area is buffered up to one square mile in all directions, and the data is summarized to allow for “consistent and rapid delivery of summaries based on a uniform grid that has been used for planning efforts across the western United States” (MNHP 2023). Thus, a species listed in a MNHP data set as occurring within the project area may in fact have habitat in the larger, buffered, search area, and does not necessarily indicate habitat on the subject property. Three categories of data are presented in this report: 1. Species occurrences for species of concern (this includes special status species and important animal habitat) 2. Other observed non-species of concern, or species of concern lacking enough data to be completely mapped 3. Other species that have not been documented in the buffered project area, but that could be present based on habitat distribution Data from the MNHP was reviewed by a Morrison-Maierle Environmental Scientist and is presented in this memo. The complete MNHP report is attached for reference. 173 2 | Page General Habitat: Historic aerial imagery of the subject property indicates that it has been undeveloped at least throughout the period of record (1985-2023) (Google Earth 2025). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps an unnamed ditch flowing through the properly southeastward from Big Ditch, which is located just north of the subject property. Vegetation consists of grasses such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) in upland areas. Wetland zones are dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), and Nebraska sedge (Carex nebrascensis), and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Sagebrush (artemisia ludoviciana) was also present in upland areas. These conditions create habitat for small mammals. The Land Cover/Land Use database records managed by the MNHP indicate that this parcel is primarily Cultivated Crop cover and other roads. The MNHP environmental summary report listing the land cover present on the subject property is attached to this memo. Species of Concern: The species of concern documented within the property area by the MNHP are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Common Name Scientific Name Species Group Habitat Distribution Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Birds Riparian forest Resident Year Round Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Birds Riparian forest Resident Year Round Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia Birds Grasslands Migratory Summer Breeder Rocky Mountain Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus virginalis Fish Mountain streams, rivers, lakes Resident Year Round Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Invertebrates Milkweed Migratory Summer Breeder Alberta Snowfly Isocapnia integra Invertebrates Mountain Streams to Rivers Resident Year Round Snapping Turtle Chelydra serpentina Reptiles Prairie rivers and streams Resident Year Round Greater Short-horned Lizard Phrynosoma hernandesi Reptiles Sandy / gravelly soils Resident Year Round Bat Roost (Non-Cave) Bat Roost (Non-Cave) Other N/A Species Group or Habitat Most species listed in Table 1 are unlikely to have habitat on the subject property due to habitat constraints. The subject property is primarily undeveloped field, with a small wetland that bisects the parcel. Based on habitat, the species that have higher potential to occur on the subject property are the burrowing owl, and potentially the greater short-horned lizard. Other MNHP Observed Species: Other observed species documented in the property vicinity by the MNHP are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Common Name Scientific Name Species Group Habitat Distribution Hooded Merganser Lophodytes cucullatus Birds Rivers, Riparian/Wetland Resident Year Round American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Birds Lakes, ponds, reservoirs Migratory Summer Breeder Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus Birds Riparian shrub Migratory Summer Breeder 174 3 | Page Common Name Scientific Name Species Group Habitat Distribution Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Birds Shrubland Migratory Summer Breeder Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Birds Grasslands Resident Year Round Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia Birds Large rivers, lakes Migratory Summer Breeder Common Loon Gavia immer Birds Mountain lakes w/ emergent veg Migratory Summer Breeder Common Tern Sterna hirundo Birds Large rivers, lakes Migratory Summer Breeder North American Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum Mammals Mixed forest Resident Year Round Potential Species: Species that have the potential to occur in the greater buffered subject property area are summarized in the MNHP report attached to this memo. Wetland and Riparian Areas: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) maintains the National Wetland Inventory (NWI), which is a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristic, and distribution of US Wetlands. Data from the NWI database was analyzed to evaluate for the potential presence of wetland on the subject property. An unnamed excavated ditch (R4SBCx) is mapped flowing southeastward through the subject property, from Big Ditch (NWI 2025). The NWI database is based on a model that predicts the presence of wetlands from various parameters and does not necessarily reflect ground conditions. A subsequent field investigation in the fall of 2020 delineated approximately 3.58 acres of palustrine emergent and scrub/shrub wetland. There were no waterways delineated on the subject property. Figure 2 depicts the delineated wetland and is attached to this memo. Observed Species: A Morrison-Maierle Environmental Scientist assessed the property and found suitable habitat for small rodents, insects, and passing birds. The area has been influenced by human activity throughout the period of record; first by agriculture and later residential development. There are several agricultural operations still in use in the greater project vicinity. The proximity of ongoing residential development and agricultural activity reduces habitat suitability and limits the presence of species in the immediate project area. Golden and Bald Eagle Occurrences: The MNHP maintains a database of documented eagle nests in Montana. Documented nests are buffered by the normal range of the eagle species. There are five documented bald eagle range areas within the greater area of the subject property. However, none of the individual ranges come within one mile of immediate subject property (MNHP 2025). The closest documented nests are located south of I-90, near the Yellowstone River. The bald eagle occurrence summary report is attached to this memo. US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Federally Listed Species: The Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC) database was used to generate a list of Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed species that have the potential to occur within the investigation area. The results are summarized in Table 3 (USFWS 2025a). There is no critical habitat for any ESA-listed species in the investigation area. A copy of the IPaC report is attached to this memo. 175 4 | Page Table 1 Species ESA Status Likelihood of Presence Critical Habitat? Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Proposed Threatened Low No Suckley’s Cuckoo Bumblebee (Bombus suckleyi) Proposed Endangered Low No No milkweed (Asclepias spp.), the essential host plant for monarch butterfly reproduction, was observed within the investigation area. While occasional monarchs may pass through, the site lacks suitable forage and breeding habitat. Similarly, the Suckley’s cuckoo bumble bee, which depends on intact native plant communities and undisturbed environments away from human activity (MacKenzie and Winston 1984), is unlikely to find suitable habitat within the investigation area. Therefore, habitat for either of these proposed species is not expected to be present. Sage Grouse Habitat Review: Data from the Montana Sage Grouse Habitat Conservation Program indicates that no sage grouse habitat is present on the subject property. See Figure 3 attached to this memo for a map of sage grouse habitat in the greater subject property area. Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP) Directives: FWP’s document of recommendations for subdivision development in Montana outlines six components of wildlife habitat considerations, which are listed in Table 4. No known critical or key wildlife areas are present on the property. Table 4 Type Critical or key area(s) present? Description Conservation Measures Yes No Big game winter range  No key or critical big game winter range habitat is present. The property is outside of priority areas identified for Department of the Interior Secretarial Order 3362, which aims to improve habitat quality in winter range and migration corridors for big game species (FWP 2020). NA Waterfowl nesting areas  The lack of trees on the subject property limits waterfowl nesting areas. There are no critical or key waterfowl nesting sites on the property. NA Wetlands  A 3.58 acre palustrine emergent/ scrub-shrub wetland bisects the east central portion of the property and empties into Big Ditch. The wetland likely exists due to irrigation infrastructure for agricultural operations surrounding the parcel. Project design preserves most of the wetland area, although impacts will be necessary to construct roadways. A Joint Application will be prepared to minimize potential impacts and ensure compliance. Native grasslands and native shrub habitats  Historic farming and agricultural use of this property precludes designation of the property as critical or key native grassland. NA Critical habitat for T&E species  No critical habitat for T&E species is present. NA 176 5 | Page Type Critical or key area(s) present? Description Conservation Measures Yes No Species of concern  Several species of concern may pass through the property but are unlikely to have key habitat on the property due to habitat constraints and incompatibilities. To support habitat connectivity, the wetland will be preserved and left undisturbed to the greatest extent practicable. Summary: A desktop review and field visit confirmed that the subject property contains limited habitat value for wildlife. A 3.58-acre wetland bisects the parcel, but overall habitat is degraded due to past agricultural use, adjacent residential development, and dominance of non-native vegetation. No ESA-listed species or critical habitat were observed on site. While several species of concern are documented in the broader area, these species are unlikely to occur on the property due to habitat constraints. 177 6 | Page REFERENCES Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks. 2012. Fish and Wildlife Recommendations for Subdivision Development in Montana. Accessed April 2025 Montana Natural Heritage Program. Environmental Summary Report. for Latitude 45.65284 to 45.71126 and Longitude -108.75633 to -108.83852. Retrieved on May 1, 2025. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025a. Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC). 2025. IPaC Resource List for location in Yellowstone County, Montana. Accessed April 2025. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025b. National Wetlands Inventory Data Set. Accessed April 2025. 178 Appendix F: Fire Hydrant Flow Test Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 179 FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST #1 (SINGLE HYDRANT) Location:Future Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing (Laurel, MT) Date: Time:10:20 Weather and Temp:60's & Sunny MM Project #:6683.001 Data collected during the test: Flowed Hydrant Elena Sub. - Els Drive Pitot Pressure, P (psi)38 Flowrate at Hydrant 1 during test, Qt (gpm)1040 Residual Hydrant Jenea and Maryland intersection Static Pressure, Ps (psi)66 Residual Pressure during test, Pt (psi)56 Note- The residual fire hydrant is located upstream of the pump station. Calculations: Discharge Coefficient, Cd 0.9 Outlet diameter, D (in)2.5 Unit conversion factor, Cf (29.8 English)29.8 Hydrant discharge, Q (gpm)=Cf*Cd*D2(P)1/2 1033 Hazen-Williams Formula: QR=Qt*((Ps-Pr)/(Ps-Pt))0.54 Desired residual pressure, Pr (psi)20 Fire flow at residual pressure, QR (gpm) =2,371 Pressure vs. Flow curve data points:2.5" Nozzle Test Conducted By: P (psi)Q (gpm)Kolter Kukes and Haaken Syvrud 66 0 56 1040 Equipment: Pollard Water 2.5" Swivel Piezo Diffuser 20 2371 * Determined from Pollard Water Flow Test Gauge Note - prior to the pump 4 fire flow pump turning on, the residual pressure was 42 psi. Thursday, May 8, 2025 Note: Hydrant discharge, Q, is calculated as a check for the reliability of Qt above Note: QR is calculated to evaluate the capacity of the distribution system near the tested hydrant at a given residual pressure. y = -7E-06x2 - 0.002x + 66 R² = 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Pr e s s u r e , P ( p s i ) Flow, Q (gpm) Water Main Pressure vs. Flow Capacity N:\6683\001\04 Design\Testing\Hydrant Flow Test_20250508\20250508_CherryHills-HydFlowTests.xlsx Printed: 6/19/2025 180 Appendix G: City of Laurel Water and Sewer System Connection Permission Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 181 182 Appendix H: Groundwater Well Logs Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 183 184 MONTANA WELL LOG REPORT Other Options This well log reports the activities of a licensed Montana well driller, serves as the official record of work done within the borehole and casing, and describes the amount of water encountered. This report is compiled electronically from the contents of the Ground Water Information Center (GWIC) database for this site. Acquiring water rights is the well owner's responsibility and is NOT accomplished by the filing of this report. Go to GWIC website Plot this site in State Library Digital Atlas Plot this site in Google Maps View scanned well log (6/10/2010 10:45:48 AM) Site Name: ENDERBY JOHN GWIC Id: 206957 Section 1: Well Owner(s) 1) ENDERBY, JOHN (MAIL) 1025 BETTY AVE LAUREL MT 59044 [10/02/2003] Section 2: Location Township Range Section Quarter Sections 02S 24E 8 NE¼ NW¼ County Geocode YELLOWSTONE Latitude Longitude Geomethod Datum 45.681232 -108.794701 TRS-SEC NAD83 Ground Surface Altitude Ground Surface Method Datum Date Addition Block Lot CHERRY HILL Section 3: Proposed Use of Water IRRIGATION (1) Section 4: Type of Work Drilling Method: ROTARY Status: NEW WELL Section 5: Well Completion Date Date well completed: Thursday, October 2, 2003 Section 6: Well Construction Details Borehole dimensions From To Diameter 0 40 6 Casing Section 7: Well Test Data Total Depth: 40 Static Water Level: 17.7 Water Temperature: Pump Test * Depth pump set for test 36.7 feet. 44 gpm pump rate with 5 feet of drawdown after 3 hours of pumping. Time of recovery 0.25 hours. Recovery water level 17.7 feet. Pumping water level 22.7 feet. * During the well test the discharge rate shall be as uniform as possible. This rate may or may not be the sustainable yield of the well. Sustainable yield does not include the reservoir of the well casing. Section 8: Remarks Section 9: Well Log Geologic Source 111ALVM - ALLUVIUM (HOLOCENE) From To Description 0 2 TOPSOIL 2 11 DENSE CLAY 11 23 SANDY CLAY 23 24 BROWN / FINE / SAND 24 38 GRAVEL / SAND / WATER 38 39 SANDSTONE 39 40 SHALE 185 From To Diameter Wall Thickness Pressure Rating Joint Type -1.5 37 6 0.250 WELDED STEEL Completion (Perf/Screen) From To Diameter # of Openings Size of Openings Description 40 40 6 OPEN BOTTOM Annular Space (Seal/Grout/Packer) From To Description Cont. Fed? 0 36.7 #8 CASING SEAL Y Driller Certification All work performed and reported in this well log is in compliance with the Montana well construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge. Name:MARVIN W. JEWETT Company:A-1 DRILLING/BILLINGS DRILLING License No:WWC-532 Date Completed:10/2/2003 186 MONTANA WELL LOG REPORT Other Options This well log reports the activities of a licensed Montana well driller, serves as the official record of work done within the borehole and casing, and describes the amount of water encountered. This report is compiled electronically from the contents of the Ground Water Information Center (GWIC) database for this site. Acquiring water rights is the well owner's responsibility and is NOT accomplished by the filing of this report. Go to GWIC website Plot this site in State Library Digital Atlas Plot this site in Google Maps View scanned well log (6/10/2010 10:45:54 AM) Site Name: MILLER DONALD D GWIC Id: 192109 Section 1: Well Owner(s) 1) MILLER, DONALD (MAIL) 1107 GOLF COURSE RD LAUREL MT 59044 [03/03/1998] Section 2: Location Township Range Section Quarter Sections 02S 24E 8 NW¼ County Geocode YELLOWSTONE Latitude Longitude Geomethod Datum 45.6794 -108.797293 TRS-SEC NAD83 Ground Surface Altitude Ground Surface Method Datum Date Addition Block Lot SHAWN ESTATES 1A Section 3: Proposed Use of Water DOMESTIC (1) Section 4: Type of Work Drilling Method: ROTARY Status: NEW WELL Section 5: Well Completion Date Date well completed: Tuesday, March 3, 1998 Section 6: Well Construction Details Borehole dimensions From To Diameter 0 74 7 Casing Section 7: Well Test Data Total Depth: 74 Static Water Level: 22 Water Temperature: Pump Test * Depth pump set for test feet. 15 gpm pump rate with feet of drawdown after 1 hours of pumping. Time of recovery 1 hours. Recovery water level 22 feet. Pumping water level 46 feet. * During the well test the discharge rate shall be as uniform as possible. This rate may or may not be the sustainable yield of the well. Sustainable yield does not include the reservoir of the well casing. Section 8: Remarks Section 9: Well Log Geologic Source 111TRRC - TERRACE DEPOSITS (HOLOCENE) From To Description 0 2 TOPSOIL 2 18 SANDY CLAY 18 52 CLAY 52 74 SAND AND GRAVEL MIXED 187 From To Diameter Wall Thickness Pressure Rating Joint Type -1.5 74 6 0.250 STEEL Completion (Perf/Screen) From To Diameter # of Openings Size of Openings Description 74 74 6 OPEN BOTTOM Annular Space (Seal/Grout/Packer) From To Description Cont. Fed? 0 74 BENTONITE Driller Certification All work performed and reported in this well log is in compliance with the Montana well construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge. Name:CURTIS SCHELLE Company:AMERICAN DRILLING & SUPPLY License No:WWC-344 Date Completed:3/3/1998 188 Appendix I: Wetland Delineation Report Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 189 Cherry Hills Subdivision Wetland Delineation - November 4, 2020 Laurel, Montana Prepared for: Western Holdings LLC Prepared by: 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 March 2021 Project No. 6683.001 190 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Soil .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 2 3 Results ................................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Soil .............................................................................................................................. 2 3.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 2 3.3.1 Topography .......................................................................................................... 2 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory ................................................................................... 3 3.3.3 Floodplains ........................................................................................................... 3 4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 3 5 References ......................................................................................................................... 4 Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B USACE Wetland Determination Forms Appendix C Site Photographs 191 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A wetland delineation was performed by Morrison-Maierle, Inc. (Morrison-Maierle) for Western Holdings LLC (Client) on the Cherry Hills Subdivision. The project area consists of an undeveloped parcel of land west of Cherry Hills Drive in Laurel, Montana (Appendix A, Figure 1). The subject property was evaluated for its content of potential jurisdictional wetlands and waterbodies, based on criteria set forth in the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (Environmental Laboratory 2010). Prior to the site visit, Morrison-Maierle reviewed existing project area literature including historical aerial photography, topographic maps, and hydrology data. A subsequent field evaluation was performed to identify hydric soils, hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. Vegetation communities were evaluated and documented to delineate wetland and upland boundaries. Based on the wetland delineation presented in this report and the data collected, it is Morrison- Maierle’s professional judgement that waters of the U.S. were present within the project area. The project area contains 3.58 acres of wetlands, including palustrine emergent, scrub shrub, and forested wetlands. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are the final authority over the jurisdictional status of both wetlands and waters of the U.S. per Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The findings discussed in this report are solely the opinion of Morrison-Maierle and have not been verified by the aforementioned regulatory government agencies. 192 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation Page 1 1 Introduction At the request of the Client, Morrison-Maierle completed a wetland delineation for the Cherry Hills Subdivision. The area of investigation covered approximately 27.4 acres of undeveloped land in Laurel, Montana (Appendix A, Figure 1). This technical report summarizes the findings of the wetland delineation. 2 Methods This wetland delineation utilized the methodology presented in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and subsequent modifications outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (Environmental Laboratory 2010). The methodology includes sampling procedures for vegetation, hydrology, and soil parameters. Upland data points (UDP) and wetland data points (WDP) were established as needed during the field visit. Sample data points were labeled with an UDP or WDP, followed by the number associated with the data point, (e.g. noted here in bold (UDP 1) to correspond to the sample points for that location. Data for vegetation, hydrology, and soils were recorded in the field and entered on Wetland Determination Data Forms. Corresponding photographs were taken at each data point. Sample points and wetland boundaries (if present) were recorded using a Trimble® Geo 7X™ Global Positioning System (GPS) unit and post-processed to sub-meter accuracy. Locations were then converted to shapefiles uploaded into ArcMap 10.7.1 for display on figures included in Appendix A. 2.1 Vegetation Vegetation at upland and wetland data points was classified based on its wetland indicator status derived from the 2018 National Wetland Plant List (USACE 2018). Using the current plant list, vegetation cover qualifies as hydrophytic when over 50% of the dominant plant species have an indicator status of obligate (OBL), facultative wet (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC). FAC plants, such as Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), are equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wetlands. Vegetation cover was considered as upland where over 50% of the dominant plant species were classified as upland (UPL), and/or facultative upland (FACU). Plants observed within each data plot were identified using Montana Manual of Vascular Plants (Lesica 2012) along with other reference books. Vegetation nomenclature follows Lichvar et al. (2018) and Lesica (2012). 2.2 Soil Wetlands must meet the qualifications of at least one hydric soil indicator, or meet the definition of a hydric soil (a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (NRCS 2019a)). Soils at each data point were evaluated and described notating the depth, matrix color, mottle abundance and contrast (if present), texture, etc. (Environmental Laboratory, 1987 and 2010). 193 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation Page 2 Moist matrix color and moist mottle color of the soils were determined utilizing the Munsell Soil Color Chart (Kollmorgan Instruments Corporation, 2009). 2.3 Hydrology Primary and secondary hydrologic indicators were assessed at each wetland and upland data point; one primary indicator or two secondary indicators are required to qualify the area as containing wetland hydrology. Examples of primary hydrology indicators are saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface, surface water, and water table within 12 inches of the ground surface. Examples of secondary hydrology indicators are FAC-neutral test and geomorphic position on the landscape. 3 Results A wetland delineation of the project area was performed by Morrison-Maierle environmental scientists on November 4, 2020. The vegetation, hydrology, and soil characteristics at each of 4 data points were documented in the field and recorded on Wetland Determination Data Forms for the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Supplement, 2010). 3.1 Vegetation Vegetation communities were evaluated and documented to delineate wetland and upland boundaries. The wetland vegetation was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia, FAC), Nebraska sedge (Carex nebrascensis, OBL), and common cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL). The upland vegetation was dominated by smooth brome (Bromus inermus, UPL), intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium, UPL), curlycup gumweed (Grindelia squarrosa, FACU), and sagebrush (Artemisia ludoviciana, FACU). The location of all data points are identified on Figure 5 of Appendix A. 3.2 Soil Mapped soil types within the project area were obtained from the Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2021). Three mapped soils were identified in the project area: Arvada-Bone silty clay loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes (Ax), Haverson silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes (He), and Hydro-Allentine complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes (Hv) (Appendix A, Figure 3). Soils were analyzed in the field for texture and color using the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 2009). Soils within upland areas exhibited a 10YR 3/2 (very dark grayish brown) or 10YR 4/2 (dark grayish brown) clay loam matrix. Soil within the wetland areas exhibited a 10YR 3/2 organic surface layer approximately four to six inches thick with Gley1 2.5/N (black) clay loam. The soil within the wetland area meets the characteristics of a Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2). 3.3 Hydrology 3.3.1 Topography The project area lies within the Laurel, Montana (2020), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute Topographic Map. The project area is shown to be gently sloping to flat with elevations at approximately 3,360 feet above sea level (Appendix A, Figure 1). Additionally, an unnamed ditch is shown bordering the north boundary of the subject property. During the site evaluation, the 194 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation Page 3 elevation and slope of the project area appeared to be consistent with the USGS topographic map. 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service maintains the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), which serves as a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristics, and distribution of U.S. wetlands. According to the NWI database, freshwater emergent wetland features exist within the subject property (USFWS 20 21). Appendix A, Figure 4 depicts the NWI features in the project vicinity. 3.3.3 Floodplains The project area is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 30111C1420E, effective November 6, 2013. The project area lies within an area designated Zone X (area of minimal flood hazard) and Zone D (area with flood risk due to levee) (FEMA 2021). A map of the FIRM is located in Appendix A. 4 Conclusions Based on the results of the wetland delineation performed according to USACE guidelines, it is Morrison-Maierle’s professional judgement that portions of the project area meet the technical criteria to be classified as wetland. Approximately 3.58 acre of wetlands were delineated on the subject property (Appendix A, Figure 5). Wetlands on the subject property consisted of a combination of palustrine emergent and forested/scrub shrub willow wetlands. No waterways were delineated on the subject property. 195 Cherry Hills Wetland Delineation Page 4 5 References Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Laboratory. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. (Version 2.0) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). National Hydrography Dataset Plus. 2021. https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/nhdplus-national-hydrography-dataset-plus Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). 2021. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home Kollmorgan Instruments Corporation. 2009. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division, New Windsor, NY. Lesica, P. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Brit Press. Fort Worth, Texas. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019a. Hydric Soils Definition. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/hydric/?cid=nrcs142p2_053961 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2018. National Wetland Plant List 2018. http://wetland- plants.usace.army.mil/ US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2021. National Wetland Inventory Wetlands Mapper. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html U.S. Geological Survey. 2020. Laurel, Montana, 7.5-minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. 196 APPENDIX A: FIGURES 197 MT COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2021 \\mmi\Share\Bozeman\Projects\6683\001\GIS\Fig 1_Topo Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PROJECT NO. 6683.001 1 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 1/19/2021 Legend Project Area ±0 0.5 10.25 Miles VICINITY MAP Cherry Hills Subdivision Wetland Delineation YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE:  Yellowstone County, MontanaSection 08, Township 02 South, Range 24 EastC.O.S. COS 3034, Parcel TR1, IN N2 (01)0 2 4Miles 198 MT COPYRIGHT MOR RISON-MAIE RLE , INC., 2021 \\mm i\Share\Bozeman\Projects\6683\001\GIS\Fig 2_Aerial Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PRO JECT NO. 6683.001 2 2880 Technology B lvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 1/20/2021 Lege nd Proje ct Area ±0 400 800200 Feet AERIAL MAP Ch erry Hills Su bdivision Wetland Delin eatio n YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 199 He Ax He Hv Lo Ax Kg Tm Ls Lo Hy Vd An Th Ke Ls Am Lr W An Th Lr MT COPYRIGHT MOR RISON-MAIE RLE , INC., 2021 \\mm i\Share\Bozeman\Projects\6683\001\GIS\Fig 3_Soils Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PRO JECT NO. 6683.001 3 2880 Technology B lvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 1/20/2021 Lege nd Proje ct Area Soil Map Unit ±0 400 800200 Feet NRCS SOILS MAP Ch erry Hills Su bdivision Wetland Delin eatio n YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 200 MT COPYRIGHT MOR RISON-MAIE RLE , INC., 2021 N:\6683\001\GIS\Fig 4_NWI Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PRO JECT NO. 6683.001 4 2880 Technology B lvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 1/20/2021 Lege nd Proje ct Area Freshwate r Emerge nt Wetland Freshwate r Pond Riverine ±0 400 800200 Feet NATIO NAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP Ch erry Hills Su bdivision Wetland Delin eatio n YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE: 201 !(!( !(!( MT COPYRIGHT MOR RISON-MAIE RLE , INC., 2021 N:\6683\001\GIS\Fig 5_WD Map.mxd FIGURE NO. PRO JECT NO. 6683.001 5 2880 Technology B lvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 1/20/2021 Lege nd Proje ct Area Wetland (3.58 acres) !(Data Point ±0 300 600150 Feet WETLAND DELINEATION MAP Ch erry Hills Su bdivision Wetland Delin eatio n YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DRAWN BY: BC CHK'D BY: CP APPR. BY: CP DATE:  UDP 1 WDP 1 WDP 2 UDP 2 202 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mileZone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 3/1/2021 at 11:29 AM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS 8 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. 1:6,000 108°47'58"W 45°41'2"N 108°47'20"W 45°40'37"N Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 203 APPENDIX B: USACE WETLAND DETERMINATION FORMS 204 Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:11/4/2020 Applicant/Owner: Western Holdings LLC State:Montana Sampling Point:UDP 1 Investigator(s):C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat:45 40.53' 93 Long:108 47.39' 91" Soil Map Unit Name:(HV) Hydro-Allentine Complex 2 to 7 percent slopes Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No X Yes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Cherry Hills Subdivision Laurel/Yellowstone Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: NE1/4, NW1/4 Section 8, T2S, R24E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland? 205 Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 1 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 0 (A) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 0%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 0 x 3 =0 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 95 x 5 =475 7 Column Totals:95 (A) (B)475 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =5 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 95 YES UPL in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 5 NO #N/A height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Thinopyrum intermedium Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Sapling Stratum (30') Bromus inermis Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') 206 SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP 1 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-14 100 silty clay loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Color (moist) Redox Fetures 10YR 3/2 Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. 207 Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:11/4/2020 Applicant/Owner: Western Holdings LLC State:Montana Sampling Point:UDP 2 Investigator(s):C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat:45 40.51' 83 Long:108 47.39' 49" Soil Map Unit Name:(HV) Hydro-Allentine Complex 2 to 7 percent slopes Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes No X Yes No X Yes Yes No X No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?Yes No X Depth (inches)Yes (includes cappillary fringe)No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology, this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Remarks: Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Cherry Hills Subdivision Laurel/Yellowstone Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: NE1/4, NW1/4 Section 8, T2S, R24E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland? 208 Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 50%(A/B) Total Cover 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 20 x 3 =60 5 FACU species 10 x 4 =40 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:30 (A) (B)100 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =3 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 10 NO FACU in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 40 YES #N/A height 3 10 NO #N/A 4 20 YES FAC Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 80 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Thinopyrum intermedium Artemisia tridentata Alopecurus pratensis Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Sapling Stratum (30') Grindelia squarrosa Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') 209 SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana UDP 2 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-12 100 clay loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Color (moist) Redox Fetures 10YR 4/2 Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Remarks Color (moist) 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. 210 Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:11/4/2020 Applicant/Owner: Western Holdings LLC State:Montana Sampling Point:WDP 1 Investigator(s):C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat:45 40.53' 81 Long:108 47.40' 67" Soil Map Unit Name:(HV) Hydro-Allentine Complex 2 to 7 percent slopes Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes x No Yes x No Yes X Yes x No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) x Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)x Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present?Yes x No Depth (inches 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?Yes x No X Depth (inches 0 Yes X (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Hydrogen sulfide smell HYDROLOGY Remarks: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Cherry Hills Subdivision Laurel/Yellowstone Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: NE1/4, NW1/4 Section 8, T2S, R24E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland? 211 Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 1 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 10 YES FAC Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100%(A/B) Total Cover 10 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 0 x 1 =0 3 FACW species 100 x 2 =200 4 FAC species 10 x 3 =30 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:110 (A) (B)230 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 100 YES FACW in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 100 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: Elaeagnus angustifolia Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Sapling Stratum (30') Phalaris arundinacea Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') 212 SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP 1 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 0-4 100 clay loam 4-12 100 clay loam 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) x Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)x Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Color (moist) Redox Fetures 10YR 3/2 Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Gley12.5/N Remarks Color (moist) 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. 213 Project Site:City/County:Sampling Date:11/4/2020 Applicant/Owner: Western Holdings LLC State:Montana Sampling Point:WDP 2 Investigator(s):C. Pearcy Section/Range:Slope (%):0 - 5 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Plain flat Datum:NAD83 SP MT Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Northern Rocky Mountain Valleys Lat:45 40.51' 50 Long:108 47.39' 72" Soil Map Unit Name:(HV) Hydro-Allentine Complex 2 to 7 percent slopes Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes x No Yes x No Yes X Yes x No No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) x Surface Water (A1)Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2)MLRA 1, 2, 4A, an d4B)4A, an d4B) x Saturation (A3)Salt Crust (B11)Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1)Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2)x Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3)Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Shallow Aquitard (D3) x Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A)Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Other (Explain in Remarks)Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present?Yes x No Depth (inches 0 Water Table Present?Yes x No Depth (inches 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present?Yes x No Depth (inches 0 Yes X (includes cappillary fringe)No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Hydrogen sulfide smell HYDROLOGY Remarks: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Cherry Hills Subdivision Laurel/Yellowstone Local relief (concave, convex, none): NWI classification: NE1/4, NW1/4 Section 8, T2S, R24E WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Is the Sample Area within a Wetland? 214 Vegetation- Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 2 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 20 YES FAC Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100%(A/B) Total Cover 20 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 2 OBL species 80 x 1 =80 3 FACW species 0 x 2 =0 4 FAC species 20 x 3 =60 5 FACU species 0 x 4 =0 6 UPL species 0 x 5 =0 7 Column Totals:100 (A) (B)140 Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index = B/A =1 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is >50% 3 X Prevalence Index < 3.01 4 Morphological Adaptation1 (Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 7 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Total Cover 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 inches or more 1 30 YES OBL in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 2 50 YES OBL height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 8 of size, and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 11 height. 12 Total Cover 80 Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status 1 2 3 X 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Total % Cover of:Multiply by: carex nebrascensis Elaeagnus angustifolia Tree Stratum (Plot Sizes: 30') Sapling Stratum (30') Typha latifolia Shrub Stratum (30') Herb Stratum (30') Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. Woody Vine Stratum (30') 215 SOIL Profile Desription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Montana WDP 2 Depth (inches) % % Type1 Loc2 Texture 1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1)Sandy Redox (S5)2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2)Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1)Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) x Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Matrix Color (moist) Redox Fetures soil so saturated hard to color Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Remarks Color (moist) 3Indicators of hydrolophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. 216 APPENDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 217 Cherry Hills Delineation Photos from November 4, 2020 Photo 1: An unvegetated portion of the wetland on the subject property Photo 2: Wetland Data Point (WDP-1) 218 Cherry Hills Delineation Photos from November 4, 2020 Photo 3: Upland Data Point (UDP-1) Photo 4: Wetland Data Point (WDP-2) 219 Cherry Hills Delineation Photos from November 4, 2020 Photo 5: Upland Data Point (UDP-2) Photo 6: Small dry ditch that runs along the fence line. Channel is almost vegetated in. No longer appears in use. 220 Appendix J: State Historic Preservation Office Report Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing: 16.09 – Environmental Assessment 221 Site # Twp Rng Sec Qs Site Type 1 Site Type 2 Time Period Owner NR Status 24YL0662 2S 24E 8 Historic Irrigation System Historic More Than One Decade Private Eligible 24YL0663 2S 24E 8 Comb Historic Irrigation System Historic More Than One Decade Private Eligible 24YL0664 2S 24E 8 Comb Historic Irrigation System Historic More Than One Decade Private Eligible 24YL0989 2S 24E 8 NE Historic Building Foundation Historic More Than One Decade Private Undetermined* 24YL1508 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Homestead/Farmstead Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1509 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1510 2S 24E 8 NE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1512 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1513 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1514 2S 24E 8 SE Historic School Historic More Than One Decade Other Ineligible 24YL1664 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible 24YL1665 2S 24E 8 SE Historic Residence Historic More Than One Decade Private Ineligible STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Cultural Resource Information Systems CRIS Township, Range, Section Report Report Date:4/26/2021 Page 1 of 1 222 Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 CAYWOOD JANENE M., ET AL. 1/6/1984 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY BRIDGER TO LAUREL TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT CRABS Document Number: CB 6 1609 Agency Document Number: Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 FANDRICH BLAIN ET AL. 7/4/2000 LAUREL MONTANA: CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ALONG EIGHTH AVENUE WEST BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND WEST EIGHTH STREET, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY CRABS Document Number: YL 4 23065 Agency Document Number: Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 HOPE SHANE, AND LYNELLE PETERSEN 3/1/2007 WEST LAUREL INTERCHANGE: A CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY NEAR INTERSTATE 90, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA CRABS Document Number: YL 4 29363 Agency Document Number: Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 HOGAN MATTHEW C 5/21/2009 EIGHTH STREET LAUREL MONTANA: A CLASS III INVENTORY OF TWO PROPOSED CONTAINMENT PONDS CRABS Document Number: YL 2 30877 Agency Document Number: 3927-005 Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 MANDELKO SIERRA A. 3/1/2011 WEST LAUREL INTERCHANGE: AN ADDENDUM TO THE 2007 CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY NEAR INTERSTATE 90, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA CRABS Document Number: YL 4 32807 Agency Document Number: Township:2 S Range:24 E Section: 8 KUNTZ PATRICK J. 9/13/2020 NORTH FORK AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY IN YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA. CRABS Document Number: YL 6 40703 Agency Document Number: STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Montana Cultural Resource Database CRABS Township,Range,Section Results Report Date:4/26/2021 Page 1 of 1 223 SECTION 5 TRAFFIC ACCESSIBILITY STUDY (TAS) 224 2880 Technology Blvd. W • Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 587-0721 • www.m-m.net Traffic Impact Study Cherry Hill Subdivision 4th Filing Laurel, Montana June 2025 MMI Project No. 6683.001 225 0 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 Proposed Development/Study Area ........................................................................................ 3 Study Area Traffic Characteristics ........................................................... 5 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................. 5 Development-Induced Traffic Characteristics ........................................ 6 Trip Generation....................................................................................................................... 6 Trip Distribution ...................................................................................................................... 6 Forecasted Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 8 Intersection Capacity Analysis .............................................................. 12 Average Vehicle Delay & Level of Service (LOS) ...................................................................12 1 NW Maryland Lane & Golf Course Road ....................................................................................... 13 2 W 12th Street & 8th Avenue ............................................................................................................. 14 3 W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) ......................................................................................... 15 4 W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) ......................................................................................... 16 Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 16 Adopted Transportation Plans ............................................................... 17 Multimodal Transportation ..................................................................... 17 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 18 226 1 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study List of Tables Table 1: Estimated Site Trip Generation ...................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Golf Course Road & NW Maryland Lane – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS .................. 13 Table 3: W 12th Street & 8th Avenue – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS .................................... 14 Table 4: W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS ................... 15 Table 5: W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS ................... 16 List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location & Study Area ....................................................... 4 Figure 2: Study Area Existing Volumes ....................................................... 5 Figure 3: Arrival Trip Distribution ....................................................... 7 Figure 4: Departure Trip Distribution ....................................................... 7 Figure 5: Site Generated Traffic ....................................................... 9 Figure 6: 2030 Traffic Volumes, No-Build .............................................................. 9 Figure 7: 2030 Redistributed Volumes, Full Buildout of Proposed Development ......................... 10 Figure 8: 2030 Traffic Volumes, Full Buildout of Proposed Development ................................... 11 List of Appendices Appendix A: Development Site Plan Appendix B: On-site Count Data Appendix C: HCS Analysis Reports Appendix D: Level of Service Definitions 227 2 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary This Traffic Impact Study evaluates the anticipated effects of the proposed Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing on the surrounding transportation network in Laurel, Montana. The subdivision is planned to include 48 single-family homes, with full buildout expected by the year 2030. The study focuses on projected traffic volumes, intersection operations, and th e need for potential infrastructure improvements. Four key intersections were analyzed: 1. NW Maryland Lane & Golf Course Road 2. W 12th Street & 8th Avenue 3. W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) 4. W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) Using McTrans Highway Capacity Software (HCS), the study assessed traffic conditions under both 2030 no-build and 2030 full-buildout scenarios. Metrics such as Level of Service (LOS) and vehicle delay were evaluated to quantify intersection performance. Key findings include: • The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 514 daily vehicle trips, including 38 AM peak hour trips and 50 PM peak hour trips. • Traffic generated by the development was distributed across the existing roadway network with consideration of expected travel patterns and access points. • All four analyzed intersections are projected to operate at LOS A or B, both in the no-build and full buildout conditions, indicating minimal congestion and delay. • The new east-west connection formed by the extension of NW Maryland Lane and W Maryland Lane is expected to slightly redistribute existing traffic patterns, enhancing overall local connectivity. • No mitigation measures or intersection improvements are warranted as a result of this development. • The subdivision includes multimodal enhancements such as 5’ sidewalks with boulevards, aligning with City of Laurel design standards and supporting pedestrian connectivity. Overall, the traffic generated by the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing is consistent with expectations for a low-density residential area and will not adversely impact traffic operations in the study area. The development complements the existing transportation network and adheres to applicable planning guidelines. 228 3 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Introduction This report analyzes the traffic impacts of the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing on the surrounding transportation network. Traffic volumes, intersection delay, and other traffic characteristics were studied and analyzed, and recommendations of any warranted improvements are discussed. Proposed Development/Study Area At full buildout, the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing is proposed to include 48 single family homes. The development site is located in Laurel, Montana at the current termination of Cherry Hills Drive and W Maryland Lane, to the west of Betty Avenue and east of Golf Course Road. Full buildout of this development is expected to require five years, thus the design year for this traffic analysis is 2030. Currently, the development site consists of a singular, 18.07 acre parcel. Bordering this proposed development in all directions are low density residential lots. More specifically, to the south are single family housing lots, to the west is the Elena Subdivision, to the east is the 3rd Filing of Cherry Hill Subdivision, consisting of single family housing, and to the north is a residential lot with single family housing. Proposed access to this development is provided through three approaches, NW Maryland Lane from the west, W Maryland Lane from the east, and Cherry Hills Drive from the east. There will be 3 streets constructed throughout the proposed development site. Cherry Hills Drive, designed as a local street, will extend further west from its current termination point, just west of Jenea Drive, and will continue to the southwest until it reaches Maryland Lane. Sophia Lane, also designed as a local street, will run north/south between Cherry Hills Drive and W Maryland Lane. W Maryland Lane, designed as a collector street, will extend west until its intersection with Cherry Hills Drive. NW Maryland Lane, designed as a collector street, will extend east to the T-intersection with Cherry Hills Drive and W Maryland Lane. Figure 1, below, shows the location of the proposed development, streets, accesses, study area, and locations of the intersections to be analyzed for existing and future conditions. Through consultation with the City of Laurel Planning Department, the following intersections were identified for detailed traffic analysis: 1. NW Maryland Lane & Golf Course Road 2. W 12th Street & 8th Avenue 3. W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) 4. W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) 229 4 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 1: Site Location & Study Area 230 5 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Study Area Traffic Characteristics Existing Conditions To determine current vehicle and pedestrian volumes within the study area, data collection via CountCam video systems provided counts during the typical AM and PM peak periods for the four study intersections on Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Figure 2 displays the vehicular volume data collected for all intersections within the study area. Figure 2: Study Area Existing Volumes 231 6 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Development-Induced Traffic Characteristics Trip Generation Trip generation is a forecast of the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The traffic generated is a function of the quantity and type of proposed land use. This study utilizes trip generation rates found in the Trip Generation Manual, (11th Edition) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The total estimated trip generation for the site is provided in Table 1 . Table 1: Estimated Site Trip Generation Trip Distribution The existing peak hour turning movements at the study intersections, along with Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) values pulled from MDT’s Traffic AADT Maps for each major corridor was analyzed to determine trip directionality through the study area. Trip distribution at the site access points was estimated based on the distribution of development within the site relative to the three access locations. Figures 3 & 4 below display a visual reference for the estimated trip approach/departure distribution for Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing. Land Use Units Average Weekday Trips Average Weekday, AM Peak Hour Trips Average Weekday, PM Peak Hour Trips Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Estimated Total Site Generated Trips (Units = 1 Dwelling Unit, 1,000 sq. ft. GFA, or 1 Employee) Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 48 DU 257 257 514 10 28 38 31 19 50 232 7 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 3: Arrival Trip Distribution Figure 4: Departure Trip Distribution The vehicle trips generated from Cherry Hill Subdivision– 4th Filing were distributed throughout the study intersections in accordance with the estimated trip distribution for both AM and PM peak hours. These vehicle trips are new to the roadway network after the full buildout of the proposed development. See Figure 5 below. 233 8 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 5: Site Generated Trips Forecasted Traffic Volumes Without Proposed Development (2030 No-build) To understand the future implications of the proposed development, it is necessary to first forecast the traffic volumes of the study area without the generation of traffic from the new development. To do this, the three corridors with available MDT Traffic Data were utilized for average growth calculations, resulting in an average growth factor of +1.50%. Figure 6, on the following page, displays the forecast traffic volumes for the transportation network within the study area. 234 9 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 6: 2030 Traffic Volumes, No-Build Trip Re-Distribution The construction of NW Maryland Lane and W Maryland Lane with this proposed development provides a new east/west connection between Golf Course Road and 8th Avenue. It can be expected that some traffic that exists in the area surrounding this proposed development will alter their driving patterns to utilize this new connection. In order to account for this in the 2030 full buildout condition, an anlysis and redistribution was completed and the results are displayed in Figure 7, below. With Full Buildout of Proposed Development (2030 Full Buildout) The 2030 Full buildout volumes are calculated from the volumes estimated from the trip generation analysis combined with the forecast traffic volumes in the no-build condition, and with the redistributed trips induced by the connection of NW Maryland Lane and W Maryland Lane considered. Figure 8 displays the total forecast traffic volumes upon full buildout of the proposed development. 235 10 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 7: 2030 Redistributed Volumes, Full Buildout of Proposed Development 236 11 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Figure 8: 2030 Traffic Volumes, Full Buildout of Proposed Development 237 12 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Intersection Capacity Analysis To provide objective analysis-based recommendations and provide insight into the future operations of the surrounding transportation network, capacity analyses of the study intersections were completed. The future conditions analyzed are 2030 No-Build and 2030 Full Buildout, discussed in the above sections. Average Vehicle Delay & Level of Service (LOS) The analysis of intersection capacity within the study area was conducted using McTrans Highway Capacity Software (HCS), which applies concepts from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) to evaluate traffic conditions. This software is utilized to assess key metrics such as Level of Service (LOS), which quantifies average vehicle delay, and Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratios, which indicate the degree of congestion at each intersection. By utilizing HCS, the study provides a standardized and reliable evaluation and comparison of future traffic operations, ensuring that projected traffic conditions are accurately represented and appropriate mitigation measures are identified if necessary. 238 13 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study 1 NW Maryland Lane & Golf Course Road Existing Conditions Golf Course Road is a north/south collector street with one travel lane in each direction. NW Maryland Lane is a east/west local street with one travel lane in each direction. NW Maryland Lane intersects Golf Course Road from the east at a full movement, 3-way intersection with no eastbound approach. There are no turn lanes present, and stop control on NW Maryland Lane. At this intersection, the speed limits for Golf Course Road and NW Maryland Lane are 45 mph and 25 mph, respectively. Capacity Analysis Capacity of this intersection was conducted using the 2030 no-build and 2030 full buildout traffic volumes derived earlier within this report and the intersection layout described above. The HCS Two-way Stop Control Analysis tool was utilized to provide an objective comparison of the future conditions . The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Golf Course Road & NW Maryland Lane – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS The analysis summarized in Table 2 shows that site-generated traffic will have no significant impact on delay or operations at this intersection. No intersection improvements are required. Direction - Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No-Build Full Buildout No-Build Full Buildout Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Westbound 9.8 A 10.2 B 9.5 A 9.6 A Southbound 7.4 A 7.5 A 7.5 A 7.5 A 239 14 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study 2 W 12th Street & 8th Avenue Existing Conditions W 12th Street is a east/west local street with one travel lane in each direction. 8th Avenue is a north/south collector street with one travel lane in each direction. 8th Avenue intersects W 12th Street at a full movement, 3-way intersection with no southbound approach, no turn lanes present, and stop control on the northbound approach. At this intersection, the speed limit for both W 12th Street and 8th Avenue is 25 mph. Capacity Analysis Capacity of this intersection was conducted using the 2030 no-build and full buildout traffic volumes derived earlier within this report and the aforementioned intersection layout. The HCS Two-way Stop Control Analysis tool was utilized to provide an objective comparison of the future conditions. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: W 12th Street & 8th Avenue – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS The analysis summarized above shows that site-generated traffic will have no significant impact on delay or operations at this intersection. No intersection improvements are required. Direction - Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No-Build Full Buildout No-Build Full Buildout Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Westbound 7.4 A 7.4 A 7.3 A 7.3 A Northbound 8.9 A 8.9 A 8.8 A 8.9 A 240 15 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study 3 W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) Existing Conditions W Maryland Lane, west of 8th Avenue, is a east/west local street with one travel lane in each direction. 8th Avenue is a north/south collector street with one travel lane in each direction. W Maryland Lane intersects 8th Avenue at a full movement, 3-way intersection with no westbound approach, no turn lanes present, and stop control on W Maryland Lane. At this intersection, the speed limit for both W Maryland Lane and 8th Avenue is 25 mph. Capacity Analysis Capacity of this intersection was conducted using the 2030 no-build and full buildout traffic volumes derived earlier within this report and the proposed intersection layout. The HCS Two -way Stop Control Analysis tool was utilized to provide an objective comparison of the future conditions . The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 4. Table 4: W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (North) – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS The analysis summarized above shows that site-generated traffic will have no significant impact on delay or operations at this intersection. No intersection improvements are required. Direction - Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No-Build Full Buildout No-Build Full Buildout Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 9.0 A 9.3 A 8.8 A 8.9 A Northbound 7.4 A 7.4 A 7.4 A 7.4 A 241 16 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study 4 W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) Existing Conditions W Maryland Lane, east of 8th Avenue, is a east/west collector street with one travel lane in each direction. 8th Avenue is a north/south collector street with one travel lane in each direction. W Maryland Lane intersects 8th Avenue at a full movement, 3-way intersection with no eastbound approach, no turn lanes present, and stop control on W Maryland Lane. At this intersection, the speed limit for both W Maryland Lane and 8th Avenue is 25 mph. Capacity Analysis Capacity of this intersection was conducted using the 2030 full buildout traffic volumes derived earlier within this report and the aforementioned intersection layout. The HCS Two-way Stop Control Analysis tool was utilized to provide an objective comparison of the future conditions. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 5. Table 5: W Maryland Lane & 8th Avenue (South) – Average Vehicle Delay & LOS The analysis summarized above shows that the proposed intersection will have no significant impact on delay or operations at this intersection. No intersection improvements are required. Direction - Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No-Build Full Buildout No-Build Full Buildout Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Westbound 10.6 B 11.2 B 9.4 A 9.5 A Southbound 7.6 A 7.6 A 7.5 A 7.5 A 242 17 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Adopted Transportation Plans The City of Laurel Long Range Transportation Plan - 2014 applies to the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing study area. This report analyzes the operations of the multi-modal transportation system and provides recommendations in the form of improvement projects and programs with the intent to address existing problems and meet future demands. No specific projects or programs are recommended within the the study area discussed in this report. Multimodal Transportation Multimodal transportation is an important consideration for the sustainable development of transportation networks. Throughout the study area, there exists sidewalk along all developed lots with consistent width of 5’ and no boulevard. Upon full buildout, Cherry Hill Subdivision– 4th Filing will have two typical sections regarding the pedestrian facilities. On Sophia Lane and the continuation of Cherry Hills Drive there will be a 5’ wide concrete sidewalk with 5.5’ of boulevard between curb and sidewalk on both sides of the streets. On W Maryland Lane and NW Maryland Lane, there will be a 5’ wide concrete sidewalk with 9.5’ of boulevard between curb and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. These will provide safe, multimodal transportation avenues for pedestrians within and surrounding the development area and are consistent with the standards outlined in the City of Laurel Municipal Code Table 16.4.C.1. 243 18 Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Traffic Impact Study Conclusions • The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 514 daily vehicle trips, including 38 AM peak hour trips and 50 PM peak hour trips. • Traffic generated by the development was distributed across the existing roadway network with consideration of expected travel patterns and access points. • All four analyzed intersections are projected to operate at LOS A or B, both in the no-build and full buildout conditions. • The new east-west connection formed by the extension of NW Maryland Lane and W Maryland Lane is expected to slightly redistribute existing traffic patterns, enhancing overall local connectivity. • No mitigation measures or intersection improvements are warranted as a result of this development. • The subdivision includes multimodal enhancements such as 5’ sidewalks with boulevards, aligning with City of Laurel design standards and supporting pedestrian connectivity. 244 Appendix A On-site Vehicle Counts Road Design Report for Spanish Peaks Resort 245 Turn Movement Counts NW Maryland Ln & Golf Course Rd. Laurel, MT Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Peak AM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 13 0 7 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 27 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 21 0 4 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 35 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 25 0 7 0 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 45 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 32 0 12 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 53 160 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 27 0 5 0 1 0 21 4 0 0 0 58 191 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 13 0 7 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 36 192 <-- Peak Hour 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 30 177 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 25 149 Peak Hour 0 97 0 31 0 1 0 52 11 0 0 0 Volume PHF = 0.83 AM PH HV 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM Ped Vol 0 0 0 0 Peak PM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 19 7 0 0 0 36 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 14 6 0 0 0 32 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 19 4 0 0 0 37 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 1 15 0 3 0 0 0 23 8 0 0 0 50 155 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 11 0 5 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 0 40 159 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 27 8 0 0 0 49 176 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 13 0 5 0 0 0 20 7 0 0 0 45 184 <-- Peak Hour 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 21 0 4 0 0 0 19 6 0 0 0 50 184 <-- Peak Hour Peak Hour 1 49 0 13 0 0 0 90 23 0 0 0 Volume PMPH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Ped Vol 0 0 0 0 PHF = 0.92 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 4*15V VPHF= 246 Turn Movement Counts 12th St. & 8th Ave. Laurel, MT Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Peak AM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 5 14 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 4 1 0 3 0 3 0 6 3 20 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 2 0 15 3 27 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 0 0 8 7 0 3 0 4 0 16 1 39 100 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 26 112 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 6 0 5 2 27 119 <-- Peak Hour 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 10 102 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 7 0 2 0 1 0 5 1 17 80 Peak Hour 0 0 0 28 19 0 5 0 21 0 40 6 Volume PHF = 0.76 AM PH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM Ped Vol 0 0 3 0 Peak PM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 6 0 4 0 4 0 5 1 21 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 10 0 2 3 22 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 23 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 0 10 8 0 2 0 8 0 2 2 32 98 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 0 0 4 10 0 2 0 7 0 2 1 26 103 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 0 0 7 6 0 8 0 4 0 0 3 28 109 <-- Peak Hour 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 0 0 3 9 0 1 0 6 0 2 1 22 108 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 0 0 6 8 0 4 0 6 0 2 4 30 106 Peak Hour 0 0 0 26 29 0 12 0 28 0 8 6 Volume PMPH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Ped Vol 0 0 4 0 PHF = 0.85 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 4*15V VPHF= 247 Turn Movement Counts W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave. (North) Laurel, MT Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Peak AM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 7 21 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 22 37 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 16 33 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 14 1 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 21 50 141 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 9 0 0 0 0 14 10 0 1 0 16 50 170 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 0 14 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 10 38 171 <-- Peak Hour 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 5 16 154 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 15 27 131 Peak Hour 0 45 1 0 0 0 33 27 0 2 0 63 Volume PHF = 0.86 AM PH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM Ped Vol 0 0 0 1 Peak PM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 16 8 0 1 0 8 36 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 8 1 0 0 0 13 13 0 1 0 6 42 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 10 0 0 0 12 42 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 14 0 0 0 0 20 9 0 0 0 7 50 170 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 0 6 0 0 0 0 18 9 0 1 0 13 47 181 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 0 11 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 14 45 184 <-- Peak Hour 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 0 5 1 0 0 0 16 8 0 1 0 4 35 177 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 0 13 1 0 0 0 17 12 0 1 0 7 51 178 Peak Hour 0 35 0 0 0 0 61 41 0 1 0 46 Volume PMPH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Ped Vol 4 0 0 1 PHF = 0.92 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 4*15V VPHF= 248 Turn Movement Counts W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave. (South) Laurel, MT Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Peak AM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 2 16 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 22 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7 23 0 3 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 44 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 9 15 0 9 0 3 0 6 6 0 0 0 48 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 14 21 0 14 0 2 0 12 16 0 0 0 79 193 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 10 15 0 18 0 8 0 16 17 0 0 0 84 255 <-- Peak Hour 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 5 19 0 2 0 4 0 9 2 0 0 0 41 252 <- Adjusted PH to match rest of study area 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 1 7 0 3 0 3 0 5 4 0 0 0 23 227 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 5 11 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 28 176 Peak Hour 38 70 0 43 0 17 0 43 41 0 0 0 Volume PHF = 0.75 AM PH HV 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 1.43 0.00 2.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM Ped Vol 1 1 0 0 Peak PM Period Interval Hourly Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Total Total 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 3 8 0 6 0 7 0 18 1 0 0 0 43 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 1 12 0 4 0 7 0 20 6 0 0 0 50 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5 10 0 6 0 6 0 21 5 0 0 0 53 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5 16 0 6 0 12 0 16 7 0 0 0 62 208 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 4 15 0 3 0 8 0 19 5 0 0 0 54 219 <-- Peak Hour 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 2 23 0 1 0 6 0 14 3 0 0 0 49 218 <- Adjusted PH to match rest of study area 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 2 7 0 3 0 6 0 17 6 0 0 0 41 206 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 4 16 0 4 0 11 0 18 0 0 0 0 53 197 Peak Hour 16 64 0 16 0 32 0 70 20 0 0 0 Volume PMPH HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %HV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM Ped Vol 0 2 0 0 PHF = 0.88 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 4*15V VPHF= 249 Appendix B Existing and Forecast Volumes Traffic Impact Study for Walker Springs 250 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection NW Maryland Ln & Golf Course Rd. Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed AMPH - 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)33 1 56 12 0 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.23 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)41 0 Capacity, c (veh/h)798 1509 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.0 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.8 7.4 0.0 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.8 0.0 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:42:55 PM NBAM - 1 NWML & GCRd.xtw 251 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection NW Maryland Ln & Golf Course Rd. Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed AMPH - 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)47 7 56 14 31 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.23 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)65 37 Capacity, c (veh/h)759 1506 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)7.5 2.6 Control Delay (s/veh)10.2 7.5 0.2 Level of Service (LOS)B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)10.2 2.4 Approach LOS B A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:06:54 PM FBAM - 1 NWML & GCRd.xtw 252 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection NW Maryland Ln & Golf Course Rd. Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed PMPH - 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)14 0 97 25 1 53 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.23 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)15 1 Capacity, c (veh/h)815 1446 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 7.5 0.0 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.5 0.1 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:41:51 PM NBPM - 1 NWML & GCRd.xtw 253 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection NW Maryland Ln & Golf Course Rd. Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed PMPH - 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)22 8 97 32 18 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.40 6.23 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.50 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)33 20 Capacity, c (veh/h)814 1437 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.0 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 7.5 0.1 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.6 2.5 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:07:35 PM FBPM - 1 NWML & GCRd.xtw 254 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W 12th St & 8th Ave Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W 12th Street Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Avenue Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.76 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume (veh/h)43 6 30 20 5 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.40 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)39 37 Capacity, c (veh/h)1539 959 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 2.5 Control Delay (s/veh)7.4 0.2 8.9 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)4.5 8.9 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:43:39 PM NBAM - 2 12th & 8th.xtw 255 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W 12th St & 8th Ave Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W 12th Street Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Avenue Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.76 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume (veh/h)47 6 30 22 5 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.40 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)39 47 Capacity, c (veh/h)1533 961 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 5.0 Control Delay (s/veh)7.4 0.2 8.9 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)4.4 8.9 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:06:30 PM FBAM - 2 12th & 8th.xtw 256 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W 12th St & 8th Ave Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W 12th Street Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Avenue Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume (veh/h)9 6 28 31 13 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.40 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)33 51 Capacity, c (veh/h)1597 988 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 5.0 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 0.2 8.8 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)3.5 8.8 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:42:08 PM NBPM - 2 12th & 8th.xtw 257 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W 12th St & 8th Ave Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W 12th Street Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Avenue Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume (veh/h)12 6 29 36 13 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.10 6.40 6.20 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.20 3.50 3.30 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)34 55 Capacity, c (veh/h)1592 986 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.06 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.5 5.0 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 0.2 8.9 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)3.4 8.9 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:09:55 PM FBPM - 2 12th & 8th.xtw 258 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (North) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)2 68 36 29 48 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.43 6.23 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 3.33 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)84 43 Capacity, c (veh/h)994 1554 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)7.7 2.5 Control Delay (s/veh)9.0 7.4 0.2 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.0 4.2 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:43:59 PM NBAM - 3 WML & 8th (North).xtw 259 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (North) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)10 108 45 26 38 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.43 6.23 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 3.33 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)142 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)983 1554 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.5 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)12.8 2.5 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 7.4 0.3 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.3 4.8 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:07:19 PM FBAM - 3 WML & 8th (North).xtw 260 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (North) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)1 50 66 44 38 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.43 6.23 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 3.33 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)55 72 Capacity, c (veh/h)1015 1577 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.1 2.5 Control Delay (s/veh)8.8 7.4 0.3 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)8.8 4.6 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:42:29 PM NBPM - 3 WML & 8th (North).xtw 261 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (North) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street NW Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street Golf Course Rd Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h)5 73 45 26 38 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.43 6.23 4.10 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.53 3.33 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)85 49 Capacity, c (veh/h)998 1564 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)7.7 2.5 Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 7.4 0.2 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)8.9 4.8 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:05:58 PM FBPM - 3 WML & 8th (North).xtw 262 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (South) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Ave Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.75 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)46 18 46 44 41 75 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.42 6.20 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 3.30 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)85 55 Capacity, c (veh/h)726 1458 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)10.1 2.6 Control Delay (s/veh)10.6 7.6 0.3 Level of Service (LOS)B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)10.6 2.9 Approach LOS B A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:44:20 PM NBAM - 4 WML & 8th (South).xtw 263 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (South) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Ave Time Analyzed AMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.75 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)46 20 50 44 56 100 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.42 6.20 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 3.30 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)88 75 Capacity, c (veh/h)665 1451 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.5 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)12.7 5.1 Control Delay (s/veh)11.2 7.6 0.4 Level of Service (LOS)B A A Approach Delay (s/veh)11.2 3.0 Approach LOS B A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:09:22 PM FBAM - 4 WML & 8th (South).xtw 264 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (South) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Ave Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 No Build Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)17 34 75 22 17 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.42 6.20 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 3.30 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)58 19 Capacity, c (veh/h)881 1466 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.0 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh)9.4 7.5 0.1 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.4 1.6 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:43:21 PM NBPM - 4 WML & 8th (South).xtw 265 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst C. Grant Duininck Intersection W Maryland Ln & 8th Ave (South) Agency/Co.Morrison-Maierle Jurisdiction City of Laurel, Montana Date Performed 5/20/2025 East/West Street W Maryland Ln Analysis Year 2025 North/South Street 8th Ave Time Analyzed PMPH 2030 Full Buildout Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Cherry Hill - 4th Filing Lanes Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h)17 41 86 22 26 83 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 0 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec)6.42 6.20 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.52 3.30 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)66 30 Capacity, c (veh/h)858 1451 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.0 2.6 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 7.5 0.2 Level of Service (LOS)A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.5 1.9 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS™TWSC Version 2025 Generated: 6/17/2025 3:05:06 PM FBPM - 4 WML & 8th (South).xtw 266 Appendix C HCS Analyses Traffic Impact Study for Walker Springs 267 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION Level of service (LOS) is determined by the control delay experienced by drivers and is calculated for each movement, each approach, and for the intersection as a whole in signalized conditions. Control delay is defined as the total delay experienced by a driver and include initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. In unsignalized conditions the delay a vehicle experiences is determined by the capacity of the approach, the degree of saturation on the uncontrolled roadway, and the number of acceptable gaps in the passing traffic stream. The delay a vehicle experiences is a function of the capacity of the approach, the volume of traffic, and the signal timing in signalized conditions. LOS values range from A to F. The delay range for each LOS value under unsignalized and signalized conditions is shown in the following tables. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SECONDS/VEHICLE) A 0-10 B >10-15 C >15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F >50 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SECONDS/VEHICLE) A 0-10 B >10-20 C >20-35 D >35-55 E >55-80 F >80 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition 268 SECTION 6 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MEMOS 269 Preliminary Plat Application Memo Page 1 TO: City of Laurel Planning Department FROM: Morrison-Maierle RE: Cherry Hill 4th Filing Preliminary Plat Application – Geotechnical Requirements The purpose of this memo is to request alternative timing for providing the information required in the City of Laurel Code of Ordinances, Title 16 Subdivisions, Appendix F.6.e. The required information within Appendix F, Item 6.e, is listed below: · Analysis of engineering properties and recommendations in relation to foundations; over- excavation and engineered fill; bearing capacity; lateral loads on basement walls; soil friction factor; earthwork; site grading and runoff control; foundation and retaining wall drainages; slabs on grade; reinforcing, utilities testing and concrete considerations; and ventilation and radon. We agree that this information is necessary for proper foundation design and construction and to protect future owners within the development. However, to accurately fulfill this requirement, specific site information and detailed foundation information are necessary. Without knowing the type of foundation planned for each specific site, it is not possible to provide the detailed information required under item 6.e. Once the lot owner has selected the home plan and associated foundation layout, geotechnical foundation recommendations based on site specific information can be provided. The timing for the provision of this sort of information is typically at the building permit stage. Since this is not a current requirement of the City of Laurel Building Permit, the following solutions are proposed: · Language will be included on the Plat stating, “All Lot Owners will be required to provide a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes the information required in Item 6.e. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer in Montana and be included in the Building Permit Application from the City of Laurel.” · The above language will also be included within the Subdivision Covenants. · The Geotechnical Evaluation Report must be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee in addition to the items already reviewed by this committee. · Realtors will be informed of this requirement by the Owner and must inform all potential buyers of this requirement during the showing of the property. 270 Page 2 We are open to any additional recommendations from the City of Laurel that will ensure future lot owners are aware that a geotechnical report is required for each lot. Sincerely, ___________________ Kolter Kukes Development Engineer 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 SECTION 7 DRAFT DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS 292 RETURN AFTER RECORDING: Western Holdings Company, LLC PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION – 4TH FILING THIS DECLARATION is made this ____ day of _______, 2025, by Western Holdings Company, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant". WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real property situated in Yellowstone County, Montana, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"); WHEREAS, Declarant intends to develop, sell, and convey the above-described real property, hereinafter referred to as the "Cherry Hill Subdivision- 4th Filing"; and, WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property, together with the Lots contained therein to the covenants, conditions, restrictions, and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants"; NOW THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, declare, publish and impose upon the Property the following Protective Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions which shall nm with the land, and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such Property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design use, and development of the Property. Such Covenants shall apply to the entire Property, including but not limited to all Lots, Utility Lot and improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted herein. The Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, Lot, or division. Said Covenants shall be as follows: 293 2 I. DEFINITIONS 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided, the following terms when used in this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions shall have the following meanings: (a) "Accessory Building" shall mean a building, such as a garage or shed, detached from a dwelling. (b) "Dwelling" shall mean any single-family structure permitted to be constructed upon a Lot. (c) "Lot" shall mean and refer to any of the above-described Lots which are subject to this Declaration. It does not refer to the Utility Lot which is excluded from the provisions of this Declaration. (d) "Owner" or "Lot Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owners of each Lot, whether one or more persons or entities, excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. If any Lot has been sold under a contract for deed or agreement for future delivery of title, the purchasers of that Lot shall be deemed to be the only owner. (e) "Property" shall mean and refer to the Lots subject to this Declaration. (f) "Residential Purpose" shall mean uses for private single-family living and shall exclude professional and commercial uses of any character. (g) "Single Family" shall mean one or more persons living together as a single, non- profit housekeeping unit, as distinguished from a group occupying a hotel, motel, club, fraternity or sorority, commune, or the like. II. USE RESTRICTIONS 2. The following use restrictions shall be applicable to the Property: (a) Each of the Lots shall be used and improved for single-family residential purposes only. (b) No more than one (1) dwelling is allowed on any Lot. No buildings used as multifamily housing or for any commercial or business use shall be allowed on any Lot. None of the Lots nor any accessory building or other improvements erected 294 3 thereon shall at any time be used for the purpose of any trade, profession, manufacturing, or business of any description. Any uses of the foregoing nature are expressly prohibited. (c) An owner may use a portion of his unit for an office so long as the activities therein shall not interfere with the quiet enjoyment or comfort of any other owner or occupant, and there are no employees at work at the unit. In addition, the Developer shall have the right to maintain a construction office and a sales office on the property until all units are sold. (d) All Lot Owners will be required to provide a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes the information required in Appendix F Item 6.e, of the Laurel Subdivision Regulations. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer in Montana, and be included in the Building Permit Application to the City of Laurel. (e) The Geotechnical Evaluation Report must be submitted to and reviewed by the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Architecture and Building Development Group. (f) Accessory buildings shall only be used for purposes which are incidental and subordinate to residential uses. (g) Accessory buildings may not be used as a residence, temporarily or permanently, nor shall trailers, RVs, mobile homes or temporary structures be used as a residence or dwelling. (h) Mobile homes, modular homes, manufactured homes, trailers, guest houses, servant quarters, and hospitals are not permitted on any Lot. Log homes, A-Frame homes, and Geodesic Dome homes are prohibited on all Lots. (i) No junk (including non-operable motor vehicles or parts thereof), trash, debris, organic or inorganic waste shall be permitted to accumulate on any Lot or tract or in any street adjacent thereto, but shall be promptly and effectively disposed of. Vacant or other Lots or Tracts shall not be used as a dumping ground or burial pit. Storage tanks for fuel or water are not allowed. (j) No noxious or offensive activity shall be conducted or permitted upon any Lot, nor shall any unsightly object, nuisance, or sign be erected, placed, or permitted upon any Lot. The Property shall not be used in any way or for any purpose which may unreasonably disturb the neighborhood or endanger the health of its residents. (k) No signs, billboards. posters or advertising displays or devices of any kind or 295 4 character shall be erected or displayed, excepting subdivision promotion signs, "for sale" signs, and mailbox and house numbers in conformity with applicable laws, regulations, and codes to identify the address of a dwelling. (l) Street lights shall remain lighted from sunset to the following sunrise. (m) Lot Owners shall not permit recreational vehicles, boats, campers, House trailers, trailers, unlicensed vehicles, or junked or otherwise inoperable vehicles to be parked upon a Lot for more than a 72-hour period for more than five days in any calendar year. (n) Noise by residences of the Lot or their guests which may disturb other residents of Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing, between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and the following 7:00 a.m. is not permitted. (o) Lot owners shall be allowed domestic pets only. Livestock, chickens/roosters, and other non-domestic pets shall be prohibited. Commercial breeding of pets is prohibited. III. BUILDING RESTRICTIONS 3. The following building restrictions shall be applicable to the Property: (a) All improvements erected on a Lot shall be of new construction, and no old buildings of any kind may be moved upon a Lot. Erection of newly-constructed modular, manufactured, or factory-built residences or other structures is prohibited. Subject to prior written approval of the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing Architecture & Building development Group (ABDG), one prefabricated storage unit is permitted on the Lot if it is no larger than 10' x 15' and no more than 10' in height. The exterior finish shall blend and be compatible with the dwelling. (b) Only those materials commonly used in standard construction shall be permitted on the exterior of any building. The use of sheet or galvanized steel, corrugated siding, vinyl siding, or asphalt siding on the outside of any structure is prohibited. (c) Siding, roofing, and trim must be white or a lightened neutral earth-tone color; the color must be approved in advance, in writing, by the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing ABDG. (d) No plastic or vinyl basement window wells are allowed on any building. (e) Two story dwellings are only permitted on Lots 1-6 on Block 5 in Phase 1 of the subdivision. 296 5 (f) Single story dwellings and split-level dwellings with daylight basements are permitted on all Lots subject to this Declaration. (g) The minimum finished square footage for the gro1md level of any single story or split- level dwelling constructed, exclusive of open porches and garages, shall be 1,400 square feet. The minimum finished square footage for a bi-level or tri-level home shall be 2,200 square feet, excluding basements, porches, and garages measured at the intersection of a plane passing at right angles through a vertical projection of such walls of not less than 2,200 sq. ft. with a full basement, 2,200 sq. ft. if no or partial basement. (h) Accessory buildings shall not be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on a Lot prior to the construction of a dwelling on that Lot. (i) All construction on any Lot shall be in accord with all state, federal, and local laws, and regulations, including setback and height restrictions imposed by the Laurel Municipal Code. (j) All Lot Owners will be required to provide a Geotechnical Evaluation Report that includes the information required in Appendix F Item 6.e, of the Laurel Subdivision Regulations. The geotechnical report shall be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer in Montana, and be included in the Building Permit Application to the City of Laurel. (k) The Geotechnical Evaluation report must be submitted to and reviewed by the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing ABDG. (l) Prior to beginning construction, all building plans shall be submitted for review and shall be approved by the by the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing ABDG. Once approved by the ABDG, plans should be submitted to the City of Laurel and any other agencies having jurisdiction regarding building permitting. (m) Addresses shall be posted as provided by the Uniform Fire Code, Article 9, Section 901.4.4. (n) Any fences installed upon any Lot shall be in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including the Laurel Municipal Code. (o) Under no circumstances shall a fence of any kind be placed in the front of any dwelling or on the side of any Lot between the dwelling and a public street. Exceptions may be permitted with prior written approval of the Architecture & Building Development Group. (p) Fences may be colored or white PVC, or black or colored chain link and posts. No other fencing materials may be used on any of the Lots, including but not limited to 297 6 galvanized chain link, wood, barbed wire, and brick or stone. (q) Flat roofs and nearly flat roofs are prohibited on all dwellings and accessory buildings located upon a Lot (r) All accessory buildings constructed upon any Lot shall be of the same color and shall have the same siding and roofing material as the dwelling constructed upon the Lot. (s) All dwellings shall be constructed with an attached garage for two or more vehicles. (t) At the time a dwelling is constructed on any Lot, the Lot Owners shall install sidewalks along all street frontages, whether said street frontage runs along the front or side of the Lot (u) Lot Owners shall install and maintain landscaping on their Lots; landscaping shall be complete within six months of completion of construction weather permitting. (v) Lot owners must utilize grass or other natural vegetation as the primary final surfacing of lawns. Landscaping rock is prohibited to be more than 30% of front, rear, and side lawns, separately. Grasses shall be mowed and/or otherwise maintained to provide a pleasing aesthetic. Landscaping rock may be used in the boulevard and as a supplementary landscaping feature within the lawn of the residence. (w) At the time a dwelling is constructed on any Lot, the Lot Owner shall install on his or her Lot the mailbox of the type and style shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. The mailbox shall be installed on the left side of the driveway as determined by facing the garage door(s). The mailbox must be located at least five (5) feet from the edge of the driveway approach. and shall be installed in compliance with all United States Postal Service requirements. (x) Any structures constructed upon any Lot shall be completed within one year from the date construction commences. Construction is deemed to have commenced when equipment and/or materials to be used in construction arrives at or the Lot. 298 7 IV. CHERRY HILL 4TH FILING SUBDIVISIONARCHITECTURE & BUILDING DEVELOPMENT GROUP 4. The Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing Architecture & Building Development Group (the ABDG) shall include Western Holdings, LLC as its' sole member upon initial final platting of the subdivision. Additional members may be added to ABDG and may consist of Lot owners and/or licensed Architectural professionals. A list of members shall be incorporated as Exhibit "C" to this document and updated as necessary with the effective date the list was updated. 5. Required Plan Review. No dwelling or other improvement shall be erected, constructed, placed, or maintained upon any Lot, nor shall any additions, remodeling, reconstruction, or alteration of the exterior of any residence or improvement be made or continue to be made, unless and until the same has been approved in writing by the ABDG. Lot owners must also obtain ABDG approval for an changes to the approved Plans if those changes affect the exterior of a dwelling or any improvement. 6. Review Application. Before beginning the construction of any dwelling or other improvement, or before any alteration of the exterior thereof, the person desiring to erect, construct, or modify the same shall submit to the ABDG two sets of the following Plans for the proposed dwelling or other improvement in addition to any other information the ABDG requests: (a) Site Plan: A site plan showing: 1) The location of all improvements, including structures, fences, walls, driveways, parking areas, utilities, outbuildings, and decks. 2) Other pertinent information relating to the dwelling or other improvement. (b) Building Plan: A building plan consisting of:_ 1) The structure's dimensions. 2) Elevation drawings or sketches of the exterior of the structure(s). 3) Information concerning the exterior of the structure(s) including all exterior colors, materials, finishes, roofing materials to be used. The ABDG may, in its sole discretion, require the Lot owner to furnish additional specifications, drawings, material samples, and such other information as it deems necessary for the purpose of reviewing the application. 299 8 7. Basis of Approval. Approval by the ABDG shall be based upon, among other things, the following: (a) Conformity and harmony of external design with neighboring dwellings or other improvements. (b) Effects of location of the proposed dwelling or other improvements on neighboring Lots. (c) Relation of dwelling or other improvements and finished ground elevations to existing topography and grades. (d) The overall aesthetic of cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing. (e) Conformity of Plans to the provisions of this Declaration. The review will include subjective judgments about aesthetics which cannot be clearly defined in this Declaration. Each Lot owner, by acceptance of a deed to any Lot subject to this Declaration, agrees to accept the decisions of the ABDG as final and binding, and waives any right to challenge those decisions through legal action. 8. Decision. The ABDG shall render its decision with respect to an application within 15 business days after the receipt of a complete application. The decision of the ABDG can be in the form of an approval, a conditional approval, or denial and shall be in writing. A copy shall be mailed to the applying Lot owner and to the Association's Board of Directors. 9. Non-Liability. Neither the ABDG nor any member thereof, nor the Developer nor any member, officer, employee, agent, successor, or assign thereof, shall be liable to the Association, any Lot owner, or any other person for any loss, damage, or injury arising out of or connected with the ABDG members' performance of their duties and responsibilities by reason of a mistake in judgement, negligence, or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the approval. disapproval, or failure to approve an application. The aforementioned parties will not make decisions on and assume no responsibility for the following: (a) The structural capacity, safety features, or building code compliance of any dwelling or other improvement (b) Whether the proposed location of a dwelling or other improvement is free from possible geologic or natural hazards or other possible hazards caused by conditions occurring either on or off the subject property. (c) The internal operation or functional integrity of any dwelling or other improvement. (d) Conformity with or violation of any City of Laurel zoning ordinance or any applicable building code. 300 9 Every person who submits an application to the ARBG, by submission of such an application, and every Lot owner by acceptance of a deed to any Lot agrees not to bring any action or suit against the Association, its Board, members of the ARBG, or the Developer or its members, officers, employees, agents, successors, or assigns to recover damages resulting from the architectural review process set forth herein. The decisions of the ABDG and the requirement to obtain approval of the ABDG may be enforced by the Association or by any Lot owner by bringing an action for specific perfo1mance or for an injunction, prohibitory or mandatory. Such actions shall be timely if brought within four months after it becomes apparent that any Lot owner has not obtained the required approval or has deviated from the approved Plans, whichever occurs later. In any such action, the prevailing patty shall be entitled to recover from the losing party all costs and attorney fees incurred. V. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 10. A stormwater pond shall be required to treat stormwater runoff from the subdivision and will be located on a dedicated Utility Lot. The cost of maintaining said stormwater facilities and the lot shall be paid by the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing Owners' Association, Inc. 11. Each Lot and the exterior appearance of improvements which are part of the Lot shall be maintained in a clean, neat, and orderly condition at all times. (a) General Maintenance. Each Lot Owner shall maintain both the exterior of all improvements on the Owner's Lot, including buildings, fences, and the landscaping in good repair. Owners shall keep the buildings painted or stained, lawns cut, shrubbery trimmed, rubbish and debris removed, and shall otherwise maintain the same in a neat and aesthetically pleasing condition. All damage to any exterior part of a building or other improvement shall be repaired as promptly as is reasonably possible. (b) All costs of repairs, construction, and maintenance pertaining to each Lot, dwelling, and all other accessory buildings upon the Lot shall be at the Owner's expense. (c) All noxious weeds listed on the latest Yellowstone County noxious weed list must be controlled on all Lots in the Cherry Hill Subdivision - 4th Filing. All costs for noxious weed control shall be paid by the Lot Owners of record. 301 10 IV. RIGHT TO ENFORCE The restrictions herein set forth shall run with the land and bind the present Owners, their heirs, devisees, trustees, and assigns; and to any and all parties claiming by, through, or under them shall be taken to hold, agree and covenant with the Owners of said Lots, their heirs, devisees, trustees, and assigns, and with each of the Owners of said Lots, to conform with and observe said Covenants and Restrictions. No restrictions herein set forth shall be personally binding upon any business entity or person except in respect to breaches committed during the entity's or person's ownership of or interest in said Lot. In addition to an action for damages, the Owner(s) of any Lot and Developer shall have the right to sue for and obtain an injunction, prohibitive or mandatory, to prevent the breach or enforce the observance of the Covenants and Restrictions set forth above or hereafter imposed. The failure of any Owner to enforce these Covenants and Restrictions at the time of any violation thereof shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to do so. When the initial sale of all Lots is completed, Developer's right to enforce these Covenants and Restrictions is terminated. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. The losing party in any action, lawsuit. or arbitration proceeding brought to enforce this Declaration shall be obligated to pay the reasonable attorney fees incurred by the prevailing party, together with costs incurred in the action, lawsuit, or arbitration proceeding. Costs and attorney fees shall be a lien on the property of the violating Owner and may be foreclosed in the same manner as the lien for common expenses. IV. AMENDMENT Any provision herein may be amended or revoked, and additional provisions added at any time by a written instrument recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Yellowstone County, Montana, duly signed and acknowledged by the Owners of record of not less than 75% of the Lots subject to this Declaration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as long as Developer owns any Lot in the Property, Developer's consent shall be required before these Covenants and Restrictions may be altered or amended. Developer's consent shall be considered in the calculation and determination of the said 75% minimum consent requirement. 302 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set its hand as of this _______ day of ______________, 20____. DECLARANT: Western Holdings Company, LLC ______________________________ By: ___________________________ Its: ___________________________ STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss County of Yellowstone ) On this _____ day of _________________, 20____, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared_____________________ (name) , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above instrument and acknowledged to me that they he/she is the _________________ (capacity) of Western Holdings Company, LLC and executed the same. Notary Public for the State of Printed Name Affix seal to the left 303 SECTION 8 DRAFT BYLAWS 304 1 RETURN AFTER RECORDING: Western Holdings Company, LLC PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105 BYLAWS FOR CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION – 4th FILING OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. 1. PURPOSE AND APPLICATION These Bylaws are and shall be the Bylaws for the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Owners’ Association Owners’ Association, Inc. These Bylaws shall govern and control the administration of the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Owners’ Association, Inc. (“Association”). All Members in the Association, their guests, invitees, lessees and/or sublessees present and future shall be subject to the provisions of these Bylaws along with the provisions of the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Owners’ Association (“Covenants”), incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. The acquisition of an ownership interest in a Lot in the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing (“Subdivision”) signifies that the Owner (“Owner”) accepts, ratifies and agrees to comply with these Bylaws. 2. MEMBERSHIP Persons owning a Lot in the Subdivision (“Lot”) or owning a Lot in the Subdivision in any real estate tenancy relationship recognized by the State of Montana, including, but not limited to, contract purchasers, shall be Members of the Association (“Member”). The legal title retained by the Seller under a contract for deed shall not qualify such Seller as a Member. In the event of ownership by more than one person or entity, the Owners shall designate one person or 305 2 entity to be the agent for receiving notices hereunder, and for the purpose of voting. Each Owner shall be responsible for advising the Association, in writing, of their current address and the person designated to vote. Membership in the Association begins concurrently with the acquisition of an ownership interest in a Lot and terminates at the time such ownership interest is terminated, but such termination shall not relieve any Owner of liability for obligations incurred while a Member of the Association. No Member shall be expelled, nor shall any Member be permitted to withdraw or resign while possessing an ownership interest in a Lot. Membership in the Association does not, in any way, negate or impair any Member’s legal remedies, right to bring legal action, or defenses to any and all actions involving the Association, or the Management which may arise from or be incident to ownership. 3. OBLIGATIONS Each Member shall be obligated to comply with these Bylaws, the Covenants, and the laws of the City of Laurel, County of Yellowstone, and State of Montana. Such obligation shall include, but not be limited to, the paying of assessments to the Association. Failure of any Member to abide by these Bylaws and all rules made pursuant thereto, the Covenants, and the laws of the City of Laure, County of Yellowstone, and the State of Montana, shall be grounds for appropriate legal action by the Association or by an aggrieved Member against such non- complying Member. 4. MEETINGS AND VOTING A. Regular Meetings: There shall be a regular meeting of the Association annually on such date as determined by the Board of Directors of the Association (“Board”) and properly announced by the Board. Any first lienholder shall have the right to have a representative attend any regular meeting and shall be given notice thereof, provided that such lienholder requests notice to be given. The first meeting of the Association shall take place not more than one year following the date of signing these Bylaws, if not sooner held. B. Special Meetings: Pursuant to these Bylaws, the Association may, at any time, hold special meetings, notice of which must be sent to first lienholders who so request notice, who shall have the right to have a representative attend. Such special meetings may be called on the initiative of the President of the Association, or a signed request of the Manager, or a petition signed by 25% of the total votes of the Members of the Association. Notice of any special meetings must specify the reason for such meeting and the matters to be raised. Only matters set forth in the petition or request may be brought before such meeting, unless 75% of the aggregate votes present agree otherwise. C. Notice: Written or printed stating the place, day, and hour of the meeting, and, in case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called shall be delivered personally, by mail or electronically. Said notices shall be personally delivered, mailed or 306 3 delivered electronically to each Member of record entitled to vote at such meeting at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting and not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the meeting. Such notices shall make provision to allow for the voting of each Member’s interest by proxy at the discretion of the Member. If mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mail, addressed to the Member at his, her or its address as it appears on the books of the Association, with postage thereon prepaid. If delivered electronically, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered upon the Association’s transmittal of the electronic communication to the Member at the authenticated electronic identification designated by the Member for such communications. The Members shall have the responsibility of keeping the Association notified of their current mailing and electronic mail addresses. In the absence of such notice, the Member’s address shall be the address of record with the Yellowstone County Assessor’s Office. D. Quorum: No Association meeting, regular or special shall be convened to conduct business unless a quorum of Members is present in person or by proxy. A quorum shall consist of at least fifty percent (50%) of the total votes of the Members. At any time, during any meeting that a quorum is not present, such meeting shall be adjourned forthwith; provided, however, that in the event a quorum cannot be established for a properly notice meeting, then the Board may postpone the meeting to a date no more than thirty (30) days later. In the event that the meeting is postponed in accordance with the preceding sentence, a quorum for the second meeting shall consist of at least forty percent (40%) of the total votes of the Members. E. Directors Meeting: The Board of Directors shall have an annual meeting to elect officers and to take care of such annual business as preparing a budget and other matters. The President or a majority of the Board may call a special meeting of the Board at any time upon seven days written or printed notice. Notice of any meeting may be waived in writing. The Board of Directors shall act by a majority vote. F. Telephonic Participation: So long as the Association has 50 or fewer Members, Members may participate in a meeting of the Members by means of a conference telephone call or similar communications equipment through which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other at the same time. Participation in this manner constitutes presence in person at a meeting. 5. VOTING INTEREST; PROXY An Owner shall have one (1) vote for each Lot owned in the Subdivision. Multiple Owners of a Lot will collectively have only one vote, and shall decide amongst themselves how to vote. If more than one Lot is owned within the Subdivision, the Owner or Owners thereof would have one vote for each separate Lot. In no event shall more than one vote be cast with respect to any Lot. Pursuant to the Covenants, voting privileges may be suspended by the Board for failure to pay assessments when due. Whenever a quorum is present at a meeting of the Association, those present may do any and all acts they are empowered to do unless specific provision of these Bylaws, the Covenants, or the laws of the State of Montana direct otherwise. 307 4 At all meetings of Members, each Member may vote in person or by proxy. All proxies shall be in writing and filed with the Secretary of the Association before the appointed time of each meeting. Every proxy shall be revocable and shall automatically cease upon conveyance by the Member of the Member’s Lot, or upon receipt of written notice by the secretary of the Association of the death or judicially declared incompetence of a Member, or upon the expiration of eleven (11) months from the date of the proxy. The proxy shall identify the person or persons authorized to exercise the proxy and the length of time it will be valid. If the Member specifies a choice of his or her proxy, the vote shall be cast in accordance with that choice. In addition, voting by proxy shall comply with any other applicable requirements of the Montana Code Annotated § 35-2-539. 6. BOARD OF DIRECTORS The governance of the Subdivision shall be by a Board of Directors. Such Board shall have all powers and responsibilities attendant to the general administration and control of the Subdivision. Additionally, the Board shall have the authority necessary to carry into effect the powers and duties specified by these Bylaws. The Association shall have no less than three (3) directors (“Directors”) who shall constitute the Board of Directors as the governing body of the Association. The number of Directors may be increased or decreased, but not to fewer than three (3) Directors, from time to time, as determined by the Members of the Association. Upon the expiration of the term of the Initial Directors (hereinafter defined), the election of the Board shall be conducted at the annual meeting of the Association with three (3) Directors being elected from among the Members, with two (2) Directors elected to terms of two (2) years, and one (1) Director elected to a one (1) year term. Unless otherwise provided herein, a Director must be a Member in good standing. At such election, the Members or their proxies may cast their vote(s) for each vacancy. The persons receiving the largest number of votes shall be elected. There shall be no cumulative voting. Voting for Directors or their removal may be by secret written ballot. After the expiration of the term of the Initial Directors, any vacancy in the Board shall be filled by the remaining Board at a duly held meeting or by the sole remaining director; provided, however, a vacancy created by the removal of a director by the Members can only be filled by election by the Members. A successor Director shall serve for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor. The initial Directors shall be appointed by the Declarant and need not be Members (the “Initial Directors”). Each Initial Director shall serve until the earlier of the time when (1) Declarant no longer owns any Lots in the Subdivision or (ii) Declarant voluntarily relinquishes its rights to appoint Initial Directors. Until the earlier of the time when (i) Declarant no longer owns any Lots in the Subdivision or (ii) Declarant voluntarily relinquishes its rights to appoint Initial Directors, the Declarant, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall be entitled to fill by appointment any vacancy in the Initial Directors or to remove any Initial Director. Notwithstanding any other provision of these Bylaws to the contrary, the Members shall have no power to remove the Initial Directors nor to appoint any additional or successor Director until the 308 5 earlier of the time when (i) Declarant no longer owns any Lots in the Subdivision or (ii) Declarant voluntarily relinquishes its rights to appoint Initial Directors. The Association shall indemnify any present or former Director or officer of the Association to the fullest extent authorized under Montana Code Annotated §§ 35-2-447 and 352-452, or any successor statutes. 7. OFFICERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The officers of the Association shall be a President, Secretary and Treasurer, each of whom shall be appointed by the Board. Such other officers and assistant officers as may be deemed necessary may be appointed by the Board. Each officer shall hold office until the earlier of the officer’s successor being duly appointed, or his death, resignation or removal. Any officer or agent appointed by the Board may be removed by the Board whenever in their judgment the best interests of the Association would be served thereby. Any officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. A vacancy in any office may be filled by the Board. The officer appointed to such vacancy shall serve the remainder of the term of the officer he or she replaces. A. President: The President shall be the principal executive officer of the Association, and, subject to the control of the Board, shall in general supervise and control all the business and affairs of the Association, including the filing of liens for unpaid assessments in accordance with the Covenants and the enforcement activities of the Association. The President, when present, shall preside at all meetings of the Association and meetings of the Board. The President may sign, with the Secretary or any other proper officer of the Association authorized by the Board, any deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts, or other instruments which the Board has authorized to be executed, except in cases where the signing and execution thereof shall be expressly delegated by the Board or by the Covenants to some other officer or agent of the Association, or shall be required by law to be otherwise signed or executed, and in general shall perform all duties incident to the office of President and such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board from time to time. B. Secretary: The Secretary shall keep the minutes of the Board meetings in one or more books provided for that purpose, see that all notices are duly given in accordance with the provisions of the Covenants and these Bylaws, be custodian of the Association records, regulations, rules and resolutions and keep a register or the post office address of each Director which shall be furnished to the Secretary by each Director, and in general perform all duties incident to the office of Secretary and such other duties as from time to time may be assigned to him or her by the Board or by the Association. C. Treasurer: The Treasurer shall be responsible for the funds of the Association and shall be responsible for keeping and having kept full and accurate financial records and books 309 6 of account showing all receipts and disbursements of the Association and any other financial data required by the Board. He or she shall be responsible for the deposit of all funds in the name of the Association in such depositories as may be designated by the Board from time to time. The Treasurer shall be responsible for the collection of periodic assessments to be collected. Further, the Treasurer shall record the assessments due and paid and shall prepare quarterly reports reflecting the Association’s assets, including the assessments due and paid and shall mail or otherwise provide a copy of the quarterly reports to each Director. In general, the Treasurer shall perform all of the duties incident to the office of Treasurer and such other duties as from time to time may be assigned to him or her by the Board or by the Association. The Board may delegate such of the Treasurer's powers and duties to a manager as it deems advisable. 8. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Board of Directors shall have the following powers and duties: A. To call annual meetings of the Association and give due notice thereof. B. To conduct elections of the Board. C. To enforce the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, and the Covenants of the Subdivision by appropriate action. D. To promulgate and adopt rules and regulations for the use of the Utility Lot and for the occupancy of the Lots so as to not interfere with the peace and quiet of all the Members. Such rules must be approved by fifty-one percent (51%) of the total votes of the Members, voting in person or by proxy, at any regular or special meeting of the Association. E. The Board may provide for the management of the Subdivision by hiring or contracting with suitable and capable management personnel (“Manager”) for the day-today operation, maintenance, upkeep and repair of the Subdivision and its’ facilities, open space, and utilities. F. To levy assessments as allowed by the Covenants, these Bylaws, and the State of Montana, and to provide for the collection, expenditure, and accounting of said assessments. G. To collect the assessments for the Association for the operation, maintenance, repair, utilities and insurance related to the Utility Lot within the Subdivision. H. To pay for the expenses of the operation, maintenance, improvement, repair, and insurance related to easements, common areas, Utility Lot, mail boxes, community signs 310 7 or identification, and community boulevard trees and landscaping within the Subdivision, general maintenance, management and administration of common areas, Utility Lot, and, taxes for open space, and weed control in the Utility Lot or common areas, and for any other purposes, expressed or implied, in the Covenants and to approve payment vouchers, either at regular or special meetings. I. To delegate authority to the Manager for the conduct of Subdivision business, to carry out the duties and powers of the Board; however, such authority shall be precisely defined with ultimate authority at all times residing in the Board of Directors. J. To provide a means of hearing grievances and foreclosure proceedings of Members and to observe all due process requirements imposed upon the Association and non-profit corporations. K. To meet at regularly scheduled times and hold such meetings open to all Members or said Member’s representative. L. To prepare an annual budget for the Subdivision in order to determine the amount of the assessments payable by Members, to meet the expenses, and to allocate and assess such charges among the Members for their pro-rata share of the budget each year, and to submit such budget to the Members on or before the date of the annual meeting. M. To levy and collect special assessments whenever, in the opinion of the Board, it is necessary to do so in order to meet increases in expenses or costs related to the operation, maintenance, and repair of the Subdivision, or related to additional capital expenses or emergencies expenses. N. To file liens and to foreclose liens and to otherwise take appropriate legal action to collect any delinquent assessments, payments of amounts due from Members or from any person or persons owing money to the Subdivision, and to levy a penalty and to charge interest up to the legal rate on unpaid amounts due and owing. O. To defend in the name of the Association any and all lawsuits wherein the the Subdivision is a party defendant. P. To enter into contracts with third parties to carry out the duties set forth, for and on behalf of the Board and the Association. Q. To establish a bank account for the Subdivision and to keep therein all funds of the Association. Withdrawal of monies from such accounts shall only be by checks signed by such persons as are authorized by the Board of Directors. R. In general, to act for and carry on the administration and affairs of the Association as authorized and prescribed by the Covenants and to do all those things which are 311 8 necessary and reasonable in order to carry out the governance and operation of the Subdivision. S. To arrange, keep, maintain, and renew adequate liability insurance for the Association and the Board. T. To carry out the duties and responsibilities of the Board in all other matters as may be authorized, needed or required by the Covenants. U. To allow first lienholders to inspect Association and Board records upon proper notice and during reasonable business hours. V. To serve as the Design Review Committee of the Association or to appoint Members to such Committee and to carry out the duties thereof as described in the Covenants. 9. VACANCIES AND REMOVAL After the expiration of the term of the Initial Directors, any vacancy in the Board shall be filled by the remaining Board at a duly held meeting or by the sole remaining director; provided, however, a vacancy created by the removal of a Director by the Members by a majority vote can only be filled by election by the Members. A successor Director shall serve for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor. Voting for Directors or their removal may be by secret written ballot. 10. COMPENSATION No member of the Board of Directors shall receive any compensation for acting as such, except to be reimbursed for approved expenses incurred in attending Board meetings or carrying out Board functions. Nothing herein however, shall be construed to preclude compensation being paid to any Manager who is hired by the Board. 11. LIABILITY OF MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS No Member of the Board shall be liable to the Association or any of the Members or any third party for harm, injury, loss or damage suffered because of any action taken or omitted to be taken by any Board of Director serving as a Director in good faith if the Board of Director: A. exercised and used the same degree of care and skill as a prudent man or woman would have exercised or used under the circumstances in the conduct of his own affairs; or B. took or did not take action in reliance upon advise of counsel or upon statements or information of other Members, the Manager or employees of the Association which he or she has reasonable grounds to believe. 312 9 12. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A Manager may be appointed and/or removed by the Board of Directors. The Manager or any Member of the Board or Association handling Association funds or having power to withdraw or spend such funds shall be bonded, and shall have maintained records of the financial affairs of the Subdivision. Such records shall also detail all assessments made by the Association and the status of payments of said assessments by all Members. All records shall be available for examination during normal business hours by any Member or the Member’s representative. All functions and duties herein provided for the Manager may be performed by the Board, or the President, if the Board should decide not to have a Manager. A. The receipts and expenditures of the Association shall be under the direction of the Board or the Manager and shall include a provision for: 1. Current Expenses: Which shall include all receipts and expenditures to be made within the year for which the budget is made, including a reasonable allowance for contingencies and working funds, except expenditures chargeable to reserve or to betterments. The balance in this fund at the end of each year shall be applied to reduce the assessments for current expenses for the succeeding year. 2. Reserve for Deferred Maintenance: Which shall include funds for maintenance and items which occur less frequently than annually. 3. Reserve for Replacement: Which shall include funds for repair or replacement required because of damage, depreciation or obsolescence. 4. Betterments: Which shall include the funds to be used for capital expenditures for additional improvements or additional personal property which shall be a part of the common elements of Subdivision. B. The Manager, if any, shall prepare and submit to the Board a budget, or the Board must prepare the budget each calendar year. The budget shall include the estimated funds required to carry out the functions of the Association, including a reserve for contingencies, to pay for services and materials furnished to the Association, and to provide and maintain funds for the foregoing accounts according to good accounting practices. Copies of the budget and proposed assessments shall be transmitted to each Member on or before the date of the annual meeting of the Association preceding the year for which the budget is made. If the budget is subsequently amended, a copy of the amended budget shall be furnished to each Member. The budget shall be amended if necessary and approved by a majority of the total votes of the Members voting in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. 313 10 C. A financial report of the accounts of the Association shall be made annually by an accountant, and a copy of the report shall be furnished to each Member at the annual meeting. The Board or the Manager shall generally operate and manage the Subdivision for and on behalf of the Members and shall have such other powers and authority as the Members may designate. If there is no Manager or if the Manager resigns, is terminated or the Manager’s contract expires and a successor is not chosen, the Board shall perform all the duties of the Manager until a Manager shall be replaced. 13. AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS These Bylaws may be amended at any regular or special meeting of the Association providing that a copy of the proposed amendment is included in the notice of such meeting. Upon a vote of seventy-five (75%) of the votes of Members present and voting in person or by proxy at such meeting, based on one vote per Lot, the amendment shall be declared adopted. The Bylaws may also be amended by the execution and acknowledgment of such amendment by seventy-five (75%) of the total votes, based on one vote per Lot. The Secretary shall as soon as practicable after adoption, prepare a copy of these Bylaws as amended for certification by the President and Secretary of the Association and recording with the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Yellowstone County. Bylaws as amended shall become effective at the time of recording, and a copy shall be mailed or delivered to each Member. 14. ASSESSMENTS The Association, acting through the Board of Directors, shall have the power to levy assessments on its Members for capital and operating expenses. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Subdivision, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of the common areas, open space, utility lines, and common area landscaping, property liability insurance, Association employees’ wages, mailing costs and other related expenses incurred on behalf of the Association as further described hereafter. In addition, assessments may be levied for any necessary capital improvements. Notice of each Member’s assessments shall be mailed to said Member at the Member’s address of record. The assessments shall be levied consistent with the Covenants. 15. NOTICE OF DEFAULT TO LIENHOLDERS A first lienholder, upon request, will be entitled to written notification from the Association of any default in the performance by an individual Member borrower of any obligation under the Covenants or these Bylaws that is not cured within sixty (60) days. 16. FISCAL YEAR 314 11 The fiscal year of the Association shall commence on January 1 of each year and end on December 31 of each year, unless changed by the Board of Directors. 17. DUE PROCESS BY THE ASSOCIATION In the event there shall be a default, except in the payment of assessments, by a Member or a violation of any of the provisions of the Covenants or these Bylaws, or non-compliance, notice of the same shall be sent to the Member in writing by the Board of Directors setting forth the nature of the violation or non-compliance and providing for a time certain when the Member shall be confronted by the Board to respond. At such hearing the Member shall be confronted by the person or persons bringing the charges if they are individuals other than the Board of Directors; the Member shall have an opportunity to cross-examine such individuals and present his or her own witnesses, exhibits or testimony in his or her own behalf. At such hearing, if the Member desires, he or she may request an impartial hearing examiner to be present and conduct the proceedings. Following such a hearing, the Board shall enter its findings of fact following the recommendations of any examiner, if any, and setting forth its decision and any actions it deems appropriate if it finds in fact that a violation or default has occurred. 18. MISCELLANEOUS A. Costs and Attorney's Fees: In any proceeding arising because of an alleged default by a Member, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs of the proceedings and such reasonable attorney’s fees as may be determined by the Court. B. No Waiver of Rights: The failure of the Association or of a Member to enforce any right, provision, covenant or condition which may be granted by the Subdivision documents, including, but not limited to, the Covenants and these Bylaw, shall not constitute a waiver of the right of the Association or Member to enforce such right, provision, covenant or condition in the future. C. Election of Remedies: All rights, remedies and privileges granted to the Association or a Member pursuant to any term, provision, covenant or condition of the Subdivision documents, including, but not limited to, the Covenants and these Bylaw shall be deemed cumulative and the exercise of any one or more shall not be deemed to constitute an election of remedies nor shall it preclude the party thus exercising the same from exercising such other and additional rights, remedies or privileges as may be granted to such other party by the subdivision documents, or at law or in equity. D. Surplus: Any surplus of the common expense payment by the Members over the actual expenses (including the reserve for contingencies and replacements) during a fiscal year of the Association shall be applied toward the common expenses for the following year, or shall be applied in any other manner which shall benefit the Association and which, on the basis of the United States Federal Income Tax Law, regulations and interpretations existing from time to time, in the sole discretion of the Board, is most likely to avoid taxation of such surplus. 315 12 E. Parliamentary Rules: Roberts Rules of Order (latest edition) shall govern the conduct of the Association's meetings when not in conflict with the Articles of Incorporation, the Covenants, or these Bylaws. F. Invalidity: The invalidity of any part of these Bylaws shall not impair of affect in any manner the validity, enforceability or effect of the balance hereof, nor shall it affect the validity, enforceability, or effect of the Covenants. 19. THE COVENANTS The Declarant has recorded the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing. These Covenants shall govern the acts, powers, duties and responsibilities of the Association and in the event these Bylaws and Covenants are in conflict, the Covenants shall prevail. The definition of terms set forth in the Covenants shall be applicable throughout these Bylaws and the interpretation thereof. By virtue of these Bylaws and the Covenants, each Owner has the right to membership in the Association and any Owner is eligible to be elected to the Board of Directors of the Association. The Association and its Board of Directors shall have the primary and final authority on all matters solely affecting the Subdivision area, subject to the laws, rules and regulations of the County of Yellowstone, and the State of Montana. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, , authorized representatives of, the owner of record of Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing and having a majority of the voting interest of the said Subdivision as of the date hereof, hereby appoints the following persons to serve on the initial Board of Directors until the first meeting of the Association, to-wit: President: Secretary: Treasurer: and the undersigned record owner and the said Board hereby certify, declare and affirm the adoption of the foregoing Bylaws on the _____ day of ___________, 2025. 316 13 DECLARANT: WESTERN HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC BY:_______________________________________ ITS:_______________________________________ STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss County of Yellowstone ) On this _____ day of _________________, 20____, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared_____________________ (name) , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above instrument and acknowledged to me that they he/she is the _________________ (capacity) of Western Holdings Company, LLC and executed the same. Notary Public for the State of Printed Name Affix seal to the left 317 SECTION 9 DRAFT ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 318 (SEAL) STATE OF MONTANA Montana Secretary of State Filed: BID: Articles of Incorporation Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Owner’s Association, Inc General Details Handling Option Delayed Effective Date Corporate Type Mutual Benefit Corporation with members Business Entity Name Cherry Hill Subdivision – 4th Filing Owner’s Association, Inc. Registered Agent in Montana Name Street Address Mailing Address Registered Agent The appointment of the registered agent listed above is an affirmation by the represented entity that the agent has consented to serve as a registered agent. Business Mailing Address of Principal Office Postal Address PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105 Term Perpetual Purpose Property Homeowner’s Association This Nonprofit Corporation a) Is not applying through the IRS for 501©(3) 319 Status and upon dissolution, the assets shall be distributed in the following manner: Manner of asset distribution On dissolution Upon the dissolution of the Corporation, the Board of Directors shall use the assets to pay all expenses of the Corporation and any remaining assets shall be distributed to the members of the Corporation as tenants in common. Incorporators Registered Business Entity Entity Name Western Holdings Company, LLC Business Identifier Status Active Business Mailing Address PO Box 51330 Billings, MT 59105, United States Signature I have been authorized by the business entity to file this document online. I, HEREBY SWEAR AND/OR AFFIRM, under penalty of law, including criminal prosecution, that the facts contained in this document are true. I certify that I am signing this document as the person(s) whose signature is required, or as an agent of the person(s) whose signature is required, who has authorized me to place his/her signature on this document. Daytime Contact Phone Email 320 SECTION 10 PRELIMINARY PLAT 321 NATHAN LEE CREEKMICHAEL P WHEELERJAMES L HOTCHKISSMICHAEL P WHEELER 1649 W 9TH ST S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S S S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W SS S S S S 8S 8S 8 S 8 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S S S SS SSSS S S SS SS W SWS WS WS WS SS SS SS WS SS SS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD EXISTING 80' EASEMENT DOC# 3358070 [][][][][][] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] GV GV WV WV WV WV WV WV T WV BLOCK 10 LOT 8 10304 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 17 10048 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 16 12442 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 15 7661 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 14 7577 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 13 7560 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 12 7532 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 11 7554 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 10 7639 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 9 8592 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 7 12926 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 3 9081 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 4 9774 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 3 7919 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 2 9892 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 3 10385 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 4 9353 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 5 7572 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 6 7579 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 7 7654 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 8 7613 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 1 10171 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 2 8158 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 3 8192 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 4 8013 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 5 8292 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE 03 18958 sq.ft.BLOCK 6 LOT 1 13519 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 18 11584 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 5 8695 sq.ft.BLOCK 8 LOT 2 9166 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 1 9626 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 3 8086 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 2 8086 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 1 9153 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 10 9225 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 9 9371 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 8 11592 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 7 9974 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 6 9856 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE 02 104589 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 4 8249 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 5 9219 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 11911 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 6 11884 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 5 10284 sq.ft.BLOCK 10 LOT 4 9238 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 2 8465 sq.ft.BLOCK 10 LOT 1 7834 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE 01 26162 sq.ft. N89°30'10"W 312.97' C1 C2 C3 S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 0 7 . 4 3 ' S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 2 . 2 5 ' N89°29'17"W 85.00' C4 S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 1 9 . 4 0 ' N89°30'26"W 85.00' C5 C6 L 1 L 2 S 2 6 ° 5 9 ' 1 9 " E 6 2 . 5 4 ' L 3 N89°30'06"W 108.41' C7 C8 L4 L 5 S 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 2 8 " E 5 7 . 3 3 ' N89°30'02"W 171.78' C9 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 4 . 5 7 ' N89°30'02"W 49.28' S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 6 . 2 5 ' N89°30'02"W 72.00' C10 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 9 . 6 5 ' N89°30'02"W 71.00' C11 C12 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 1 4 . 5 2 ' N89°30'02"W 68.00' N88°47'34"E 110.00' S1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " E 91 . 0 4 ' C13 N1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " W 93 . 1 8 ' L30 L 2 9 S88°48'36"E 129.27' S1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " E 75 . 4 9 ' C17 L 2 8 L2 7 S88°48'36"E 127.17' C1 8 L8 L7 C1 4 N89°38'12"E 107.18' S0 ° 2 1 ' 4 8 " E 64 . 7 2 ' L6 L2 6 L2 5 S89°30'23"E 111.26' L1 1 C1 9 C1 5 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 57 . 2 6 ' S85°30'51"E 94.40' L1 0 L9 L1 4 L2 4 L23 S78°25' 0 6 " E 9 4 . 6 9 ' N1 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 6 " E 66 . 3 4 ' S77°05 ' 0 1 " E 1 0 3 . 9 0 ' L53 L22 L1 2 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 95 . 4 3 ' S78°25' 0 6 " E 8 6 . 9 8 ' L1 3 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 96 . 1 1 ' C16 S79°53'2 7 " E 37.11' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 96 . 0 0 ' N1 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 6 " E 10 1 . 9 0 ' C20 S73° 1 3 ' 5 0 " E 81.36 ' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 95 . 5 6 ' L2 1 L20 L1 9 L 1 8 L 1 7 L16 L1 5 C21 S58° 1 9 ' 0 5 " W 53.6 2 ' N 2 1 ° 5 8 ' 1 4 " W 1 3 6 . 4 1 ' C34 S 7 ° 3 2 ' 0 1 " E 1 3 2 . 6 1 ' S58° 1 9 ' 0 5 " W 53.6 2 ' N 3 5 ° 4 2 ' 2 1 " W 1 3 1 . 4 8 ' C33 S41 ° 3 2 ' 2 5 " W 66. 7 2 ' N 5 3 ° 3 6 ' 3 1 " W 1 3 2 . 4 3 ' C32 S34 ° 0 0 ' 1 2 " W 73 . 3 7 ' N 5 5 ° 2 1 ' 5 1 " W 1 3 1 . 5 6 ' N3 2 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 49 . 1 4 ' C3 1 S34 ° 0 0 ' 1 2 " W 73 . 3 7 ' N 5 7 ° 0 8 ' 2 6 " W 1 2 9 . 9 1 ' N3 2 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 77 . 4 4 ' S71°34 ' 0 1 " W 8 3 . 9 6 ' S85°47'10"W 79.41' C3 0 N3 2 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 52 . 6 4 ' S 1 6 ° 4 8 ' 5 1 " E 9 9 . 9 4 ' C28N 1 9 ° 0 6 ' 5 2 " W 6 3 . 2 3 ' C 2 9 S 9 ° 2 4 ' 3 1 " E 1 0 8 . 0 2 ' C27 N89°53'00"E 86.51' S0 ° 3 7 ' 0 1 " E 1 0 0 . 9 7 ' C26 S2 3 ° 5 3 ' 0 5 " W 46 . 2 3 ' C24C25 N89°53'00"E 88.29' S 6 ° 1 0 ' 2 8 " E 6 4 . 0 1 ' C36 N6 ° 0 1 ' 4 7 " E 1 0 9 . 2 3 ' S87°09'51"E 88.18' S 1 9 ° 0 6 ' 5 2 " E 7 4 . 0 0 ' C35N89°30'02"W 84.30' N2 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 4 " E 12 2 . 5 5 ' S87°09'51"E 85.90' N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 64 . 5 1 ' S70 ° 2 7 ' 2 0 " E 1 2 2 . 9 0 ' C 3 7 L 3 1 L3 2 S6 1 ° 5 3 ' 2 2 " E 1 0 1 . 4 2 ' C3 8 N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 78 . 0 0 ' S6 1 ° 5 3 ' 2 2 " E 1 0 1 . 4 6 ' L3 3 C3 9 N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 76 . 0 0 ' N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 76 . 7 7 ' S5 7 ° 1 3 ' 5 3 " E 1 0 7 . 3 6 ' S3 2 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " W 68 . 2 8 ' L35 S 5 7 ° 1 3 ' 5 3 " E 1 1 0 . 9 4 ' S3 2 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " W 68 . 5 0 ' L3 4 S 5 3 ° 0 8 ' 2 3 " E 1 0 8 . 4 4 ' C40 L5 4 L36 S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 1 4 . 2 7 ' C41 N36 ° 5 1 ' 3 7 " E 65. 1 7 ' N40 ° 4 2 ' 2 7 " E 72. 0 0 ' S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 2 6 . 2 0 ' C42 S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 5 0 . 7 5 ' C43 N40 ° 4 2 ' 2 7 " E 75. 0 0 ' L4 4 C44 L37 L38 L 3 9 L4 0 L41 S 3 9 ° 1 0 ' 3 0 " E 7 6 . 3 4 ' L4 3 L 4 8 C45 L42 N75°50'4 6 " E 119.56' S83°57'05"E 77.56' L 4 5 L4 6 L 4 7 C46 S83°52'46"E 75.59' L49 S1 ° 2 2 ' 5 3 " W 1 3 3 . 7 7 ' C47 S73° 1 4 ' 3 5 " E 91.11 ' S7 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 1 1 8 . 3 0 ' C48 S73° 1 4 ' 3 5 " E 83.95 ' S1 1 ° 1 4 ' 4 8 " W 1 1 5 . 4 5 ' S73° 1 9 ' 0 1 " E 81.50 ' S1 3 ° 4 4 ' 2 8 " W 1 1 5 . 1 9 ' N73° 1 3 ' 5 0 " W 76.47 ' C49 L52 S73° 1 1 ' 1 6 " E 72.94 ' S1 2 ° 2 9 ' 4 3 " W 1 1 2 . 1 2 ' L50 S7 ° 3 7 ' 4 5 " W 1 0 9 . 3 8 ' N79°53'2 7 " W 76.31' L51 C22 C23 N73° 1 3 ' 5 0 " W 32.74 ' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 89 . 8 7 ' BLOCK 8 LOT 6 10155 sq.ft. L55 PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 LENGTH 209.22 15.41 109.52 86.44 70.94 14.24 40.18 193.00 96.91 72.02 71.09 68.18 110.03 52.96 29.63 49.92 143.74 29.50 66.48 20.32 77.65 161.93 170.88 14.14 61.44 70.24 70.22 RADIUS 444.83 440.00 410.01 410.01 410.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2860.00 370.00 369.99 530.00 2860.00 430.00 429.49 440.00 440.00 440.00 2860.00 2860.05 490.00 490.00 502.73 DELTA 026°56'55" 002°00'25" 015°18'19" 012°04'48" 009°54'48" 000°16'39" 000°46'59" 003°45'41" 001°53'19" 001°24'13" 001°23'07" 001°19'44" 002°12'15" 008°12'04" 004°35'17" 005°23'47" 002°52'46" 003°55'51" 008°52'07" 002°38'44" 010°06'39" 021°05'08" 003°25'24" 000°17'00" 007°11'03" 008°12'48" 008°00'11" PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42 C43 C44 C45 C46 C47 C48 C49 LENGTH 87.30 63.92 62.86 28.31 107.97 86.06 86.06 35.99 129.15 52.32 63.25 49.63 49.58 65.33 73.05 79.00 106.79 80.27 72.69 75.55 32.01 54.62 RADIUS 498.16 140.00 140.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 360.00 360.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 595.50 621.43 273.77 710.48 DELTA 010°02'28" 026°09'32" 025°43'27" 003°41'13" 014°03'33" 011°12'23" 011°12'23" 005°43'40" 020°33'17" 014°59'21" 018°07'10" 014°13'07" 005°40'54" 007°29'10" 008°22'14" 009°03'09" 012°14'12" 009°11'54" 006°59'38" 006°57'56" 006°41'57" 004°24'16" PARCEL LINE DATA SEGMENT L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 LENGTH 11.34 22.90 39.34 15.70 44.72 8.96 22.47 39.54 33.60 43.80 3.00 54.21 29.97 65.70 25.75 32.91 32.53 41.21 31.37 42.33 26.04 20.28 50.58 41.07 10.85 60.73 35.66 36.15 DIRECTION S40° 17' 26"E S48° 00' 24"E S21° 51' 17"E S2° 21' 36"E S37° 01' 54"E S1° 12' 26"E N1° 12' 26"W S1° 12' 26"E S0° 21' 48"E S4° 29' 09"W S11° 31' 25"W S4° 29' 09"W S11° 34' 54"W S11° 34' 54"W N9° 54' 48"E N49° 04' 33"E N7° 20' 41"W N26° 08' 05"W N27° 21' 45"E N65° 53' 27"W N55° 21' 17"W N55° 21' 17"W N35° 00' 09"E N3° 44' 01"E N22° 31' 52"E N19° 49' 45"E N17° 34' 30"E N14° 36' 08"W PARCEL LINE DATA SEGMENT L29 L30 L31 L32 L33 L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L39 L40 L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 L46 L47 L48 L49 L50 L51 L52 L53 L54 L55 LENGTH 45.86 38.83 15.17 45.18 26.63 55.56 13.15 73.24 24.38 25.26 14.35 19.40 49.78 65.68 31.20 35.63 32.28 51.36 32.65 32.17 14.74 31.83 35.35 20.70 19.65 15.81 7.51 DIRECTION N14° 36' 08"W N38° 56' 24"E S16° 43' 37"E N21° 56' 21"E S32° 46' 07"W N28° 06' 38"E N36° 51' 37"E N36° 51' 37"E N40° 42' 27"E N50° 28' 13"E S35° 03' 13"E S60° 18' 49"E N70° 01' 52"E N50° 32' 30"E S58° 35' 00"E S63° 50' 14"E S5° 44' 39"E S9° 11' 12"W S20° 49' 00"E S13° 10' 38"E S83° 58' 40"E S82° 23' 29"E S73° 11' 16"E N73° 13' 50"W N35° 00' 09"E S32° 46' 07"W N40° 42' 27"E ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2025 PLOTTED DATE: Jun/19/2025 PLOTTED BY: cody farley DRAWING NAME: N:\6683\001\ACAD\Concept\PreliminaryPlat\6683.001_CherryHills-4thFiling-PPlat.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA COUNTY, MONTANADATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 11WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC YELLOWSTONE 6683.001 1" = 80' 06/2025 KCK CJF MMI 24E 2S 8 NE NW MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANABearings for this plat are grid, derived from GPS observations with survey-grade receivers and referenced to the Montana coordinate system, single zone, NAD83. BASIS OF BEARINGS AREA SUMMARY TOTAL AREA: 18.07 ACRES LOT AREAS: OPEN SPACE & PARKLAND: PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY: 10.21 ACRES 3.44 ACRES 4.42 ACRES LEGEND TRACT 1A OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 3034, SITUATED IN THE N1/2 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 24 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA. CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4th FILING OWNER WESTERN HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC 3329 McMASTERS RD. BILLINGS, MT 59101 ZONING CITY OF LAUREL RESIDENTIAL - 7500 PURPOSE TO CREATE A SUBDIVISION FOR RESIDENTIAL USE PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL LOT OWNERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT THAT INCLUDES THE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN APPENDIX F, ITEM 6.E, OF THE LAUREL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SHALL BE PREPARED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN MONTANA AND BE INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FROM THE CITY OF LAUREL. PLSS CORNER POSITION ESTABLISHED FROM FOUND MONUMENTS AND PRIOR PLATS OF RECORD ENGINEER:MORRISON-MAIERLE INC. SURVEYOR:MORRISON-MAIERLE INC. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PROJECT AREA ROAD LENGTH SUMMARY TOTAL LENGTH: 2,956.60 LF CHERRY HILLS DR: W. MARYLAND LN: NW. MARYLAND LN: SOPHIA LANE: 1,313.74 LF 807.38 LF 309.17 LF 526.31 LF SITE DATA PROPOSED LOTS = 48 MIN. LOT AREA = 7,532.39 SQ.FT. MAX. LOT AREA = 13,518.85 SQ.FT. EXISTING ZONING = RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED ZONING = RESIDENTIAL 7500 EXISTING LAND USE = AGRICULTURAL PROPOSED LAND USE = RESIDENTIAL 7500 SSSS 8W 8W SD SD PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORM MAIN SUBDIVIDER WESTERN HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC 3329 McMASTERS RD. BILLINGS, MT 59101 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LAUREL FOUND REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. FOUND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PROPERTY CORNER; SET REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP MARKED 13108 LS SET REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH 2" ALUMINUM CAP MARKED 13108 LS; PC-PT CURVE POINT ON RIGHT-OF-WAY. W. MARYLAND LN. CH E R R Y H I L L S D R . SO P H I A L A N E BIG D I T C H IR R I G A T I O N L A T E R A L BIG D I T C H IRRI G A T I O N L A T E R A L 10' PUE ALONG LOT/ROW FRONTAGES (TYP.) TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED DURING FINAL PLAT 10' PUE ALONG LOT/ROW FRONTAGES (TYP.) COS 21 7 1 PARC E L 1 C T R 1 C 2 ND AMN D NW MARYLAND LN CHER R Y H I L L SUBDI V I S I O N 3 RD FILIN G EXISTING 12' PIPELINE EASEMENT YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DOC. #3212529 EXISTING BOUNDARY OF COS 3034 TRACT 1A WETLAND AREA (TYP.) DA V I S C I R ELENA SUBDI V I S I O N 1 1 KEY NOTES 1.15.0' EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT CENTERED ON LOT LINE.1 LOT SETBACKS PER R-7500 ZONING FRONT: 20.0' REAR: 5.0' SIDE: 5.0' 322 SECTION 11 ENGINEERING PLANS 323 N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ C O V E R S H E E T . D W G P L O T T E D B Y : HA A K E N S Y V R U D O N Ju n / 0 9 / 2 0 2 5 ©T h i s d o c u m e n t w a s p r e p a r e d b y M o r r i s o n -M a i e r l e a n d m a y c o n t a i n c o n f i d e n t i a l o r p r i v i l e g e d i n f o r m a t i o n . Morrison-Maier le, Inc. retains all common law, statutory, and reserved rights including the copyright thereto. Unauthorized use of t h i s d o c u m e n t o r c h a n g e s a r e s t r i c t l y p r o h i b i t e d a n d m a y b e u n l a w f u l . PROJECT LOCATION PREPARED BY: PROJECT LOCATION SET NO. MORRISON-MAIERLE PROJECT NO. 6683.001 APPROVED BY:APPROVED BY: ROB STOLTZ OWNER/CONTRACTOR MARTIN E. GAGNON, PE PROJECT MANAGER engineers surveyors plan ners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Boulevard West, Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net AGENCY REVIEW DRAWINGS FOR CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - FOURTH FILING LAUREL, MONTANA JUNE 2025 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LIBBY KALISPELL BROWNING POLSON CUT BANK SHELBY CONRAD HAVRE MALTA GREAT FALLS GLASGOW WOLF POINT PLENTYWOOD SIDNEY GLENDIVE MILES CITY FORSYTH HARDINBILLINGS ROUNDUP LEWISTOWN HARLOWTON LIVINGSTON WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS BOZEMAN DILLON ANACONDA HELENA LINCOLN DEER LODGE MISSOULA HAMILTON PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER OFFICE QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR PEER REVIEWER Q.A. APPROVAL DATE Q.A. PROJECT NUMBER engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle MARTIN E. GAGNON JAMES A. ULLMAN XXX XX\XX\XX 6683.001.088-000318 Sheet List Table SHT. No.DWG. No.TITLE 0 COVER SHEET 1 G-1 GENERAL NOTES 2 C-1 SHEET INDEX 3 R-1 W. MARYLAND LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+25 TO 12+25 4 R-2 W. MARYLAND LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+25 TO 18+00 5 R-3 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 6 R-4 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 7 R-5 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 8 R-6 SOPHIA LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 9 W-1 W. MARYLAND LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+25 TO 12+25 10 W-2 W. MARYLAND LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+25 TO 18+00 11 W-3 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 12 W-4 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 13 W-5 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 14 W-6 SOPHIA LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 15 S-1 W. MARYLAND LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+50 TO 12+50 16 S-2 W. MARYLAND LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+50 TO 18+00 17 S-3 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 18 S-4 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 19 S-5 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 20 S-6 SOPHIA LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 21 D-1 WATER AND UTILITY DETAILS (1 OF 2) 22 D-2 WATER AND UTILITY DETAILS (2 OF 2) 23 D-3 STANDARD ROAD CROSS SECTIONS 324 H YD LEGEND EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING WATER VALVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING STORM DRAIN FACILITIES EXISTING FIBER/TELEPHONE FACILITIES EXISTING ELECTRICAL FACILITIES EXISTING GAS FACILITIES EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN EXISTING WELL EXISTING CMP CULVERT EXISTING RCP CULVERT SD EXISTING STORM SEWER MAIN S S EXISTING SAN SEWER MAIN SS EXISTING SAN SEWER SERVICE F EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWERBPBP EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE C C EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE G G EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER OHT EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE PETRO EXISTING PETROLEUM LINE W EXISTING WATER MAIN WS EXISTING WATER SERVICE SD SD RD RD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN PROPOSED SAN SEWER CLEANOUTS WS WS UTIL UTIL PROPOSED GRAVITY SAN SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PROPOSED UTILITY CONDUIT SS SS EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING ROOF EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CURB FACE EXISTING CURB FLOWLINE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB EXISTING PARKING STRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING GRAVEL EDGE EXISTING SIDEWALK PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED CURB FLOWLINE PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB PROPOSED PARKING STRIPE PROPOSED ASPHALT PROPOSED GRAVEL EDGE PROPOSED SIDEWALK GRAPHICAL SIDEWALK JOINT PROPOSED ASPHALT GRADE BREAK EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 4654 4653.50 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 4656 4655.50PERFPERFPROPOSED PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE IRRIG IRRIG PROPOSED IRRIGATION SLEEVE PROPOSED PRESSURIZED SAN SEWER SERVICESS FM SS FM FIRE FIRE PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE BT BT PROPOSED UTILITY CONDUIT NOTE: SOME LINE TYPES AND SYMBOLS SHOWN MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS. VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ G E N E R A L N O T E S . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA GENERAL NOTES 6683.001 1 G-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONTANA PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SEVENTH EDITION DATED APRIL 2021 (MPWSS); THE CITY OF LAUREL MODIFICATIONS TO THE MPWSS, INCLUDING ADDENDA; AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL REGULATIONS (OSHA) SAFETY STANDARDS. IF REQUESTED BY THE INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF A PERMIT FROM SAID DIVISION. 3.THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONFINED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED ON THE PROJECT SITE WHERE APPROVED BY THE OWNER. IT SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION AND SAFEKEEPING OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ON OR NEAR THE SITE WILL BE ENTIRELY THAT OF THE CONTRACTOR AND THAT NO CLAIM SHALL BE MADE AGAINST THE OWNER BY REASON OF ANY ACT OF AN EMPLOYEE OR TRESPASSER. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LINE AND GRADE OF EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ENGINEER'S ATTENTION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OR CONTINUATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5.REFERENCE ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS, SECTION CORNERS, 1/4 CORNERS, AND PROPERTY CORNERS PRIOR TO BEING DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. ANY MONUMENTS AND CORNERS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR (PLS) REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MONTANA. 6.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING (AS REQUIRED) SHALL BE HELD WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, SITE SUBCONTRACTOR, CITY OF LAUREL, OWNER, AND MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY, COUNTY, AND/OR STATE INSPECTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AND 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SPECIFIC INSPECTION NEEDS DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS AND SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF AN INSPECTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE BILLED FOR SAID INSPECTION SERVICES AS PROVIDED IN THE MOST RECENTLY ADOPTED FEES FOR SUCH SERVICES. 8.IF THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZES A COMPUTERIZED GRADE CONTROL SYSTEM WHEN GRADING/FINISHING SUBGRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE, UTILITIES, ETC., THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING THEIR OWN MACHINE CONTROL FILES. THE CONTRACTOR MAY CREATE THIS DATA FROM SUPPLEMENTAL CAD INFORMATION AND THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE PLANS IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ENGINEER MAY PROVIDE THE CONTRACTOR SUPPLEMENTAL CAD INFORMATION IN THE FORM OF AN XML SURFACE AND/OR CAD LINE WORK (DERIVED FROM AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SIGN AN ELECTRONIC RELEASE.. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY INSOFAR AS IT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THESE OPERATIONS, ALL COSTS FOR PROTECTING, REMOVING, AND RESTORING EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE BORNE SOLELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY TO ASSURE THE PROPER CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF POLLUTANTS ON THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEAN UP ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INADVERTENTLY DEPOSITED ON EXISTING STREETS, SIDEWALKS, OR OTHER PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND MAKE SURE STREETS AND WALKWAYS ARE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL CONCRETE WASTE FROM PROJECT SITE RESULTING FROM CURBS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS. 12.CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE TRAFFIC SIGNS SHALL BE FURNISHED, INSTALLED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REGULATORY AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR, MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY OR STATE. "CONSTRUCTION AHEAD" WARNING SIGNS ARE TO TO BE INSTALLED ALONG ADJACENT ROADS OR DRIVEWAYS. FLASHERS WITH CAUTION TAPE ARE TO BE INSTALLED WHERE ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CROSSES A SIDEWALK OR PEDESTRIAN PATH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND ANY OR ALL LOCAL REGULATIONS. 13.AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE GRADED SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED OF ALL VEGETATION AND DEBRIS. THESE MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 14.SURFACE SOILS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS CONTAINING ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATTER SHALL BE STRIPPED DOWN AND STOCKPILED OR DISCARDED AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. DEEPER STRIPPING WHERE REQUIRED TO REMOVE WEAK SOILS OR ACCUMULATIONS OR ORGANIC MATTER, SHALL BE PERFORMED WHEN DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. STRIPPING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE OR STOCKPILED AT A LOCATION DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. 15.THE GROUND SURFACE EXPOSED BY STRIPPING SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF EIGHT INCHES (8"), MOISTURE CONDITIONED TO THE PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT FOR COMPACTION, AND COMPACTED AS REQUIRED FOR COMPACTED FILL. RECOMPACTION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACING FILL. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL ROADWAY SURFACES TO EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION THAN EXISTED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AS DETERMINED BY AGENCY, OWNER, AND/OR ENGINEER. 17.ASPHALT AND CONCRETE SHALL BE SAW CUT OR NEAT CUT AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE CURB/GUTTER AND/OR SIDEWALK TO THE NEAREST PANEL CONSTRUCTION JOINT WHEN DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 18.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE COMPACTION EQUIPMENT SUITABLE FOR THE SOIL TYPES AND SURFACE MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT. 19.SUBGRADE, SUB-BASE, BASE, AND SURFACE COURSE COMPACTION SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS NOTED IN THE MPWSS; CITY OF LAUREL MODIFICATIONS TO THE MPWSS; AND/OR THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BY RAWHIDE ENGINEERING. 20.CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS M-4000 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 21.CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY SAWING OR SCORING. WHEN SCORING, A TOOL SHALL BE USED THAT WILL LEAVE CORNERS ROUNDED AND TO DESTROY AGGREGATE INTERLOCK FOR SPECIFIED MINIMUM DEPTH. 22.GRADE ELEVATIONS INDICATED BY "XX.XX" ON PLANS ARE +3300' TO PROJECT DATUM. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM = ROCKY MOUNTAIN TRIBAL CRS 2011: BILLINGS INTERNATIONAL FEET, VERTICAL DATUM = NAVD 88. 23.SIDE SLOPES FROM DRIVE AND PARKING AREAS SHALL BE 4:1 MAX UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 24.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THERE IS A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVED BY THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (MDEQ) OR LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE CONTROL OF STORM WATER RUNOFF. IF THERE IS NOT AN APPROVED PERMIT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM MDEQ OR THE LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY. 25.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROJECT DUST CONTROL. 26.ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM. RUNNING SLOPE OF 5%. 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL TACK ALL JOINTS AND BETWEEN ASPHALT LIFTS PRIOR TO PAVING. 28.ALL QUALITY CONTROL TESTING RESULTS FOR ROADS AND UTILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF LAUREL FOR THEIR RECORDS. THIS INCLUDES COMPACTION, PRESSURE TESTING, VACUUM TESTING, ETC. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1.THE LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SIZE OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE EXISTENCE, LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, LINE, AND GRADE OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING FACILITIES DUE TO FAILURE TO LOCATE OR PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION WHEN LOCATION IS KNOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SERVICE OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. IF SAID SERVICE IS DAMAGED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR THE DAMAGE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2.LOCATION OF SITE UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE UTILITY COMPANY PROVIDING SERVICE. ANY PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO DRY UTILITY LOCATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE MONTANA ONE CALL CENTER @ 811 OR (800) 551-8344 FOR ON-SITE UTILITY LOCATION. ALL KNOWN EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MARKED BEFORE DIGGING. 4.SITE TO BE ROUGH GRADED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES TO ASSURE 6.5 FEET (78 INCHES) OF MINIMUM COVER ON BURIED WATER PIPING OR DEEPER AS SPECIFIED. IF 6.5 FEET OF MINIMUM COVER CANNOT BE OBTAINED, INSULATION OF BURIED WATER PIPING SHALL BE REQUIRED. 5.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE APPROVAL OF ALL GOVERNING AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER ANY UTILITY SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 6.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EXISTING WATER LINES OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF LAUREL. 7.ALL WATER VALVES OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE CITY OF LAUREL SHALL BE OPERATED BY CITY OF LAUREL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL ONLY. 8.SEWER AND WATER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED PLUMBER. 9.GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TAP AND TIE-IN FEES REQUIRED, AS WELL AS THE COST OF UNDERGROUND SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDING. 10.ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 3034, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 5 FEET (60 INCHES) OR DEEPER AS SPECIFIED. IF 5 FEET OF MINIMUM COVER CANNOT BE OBTAINED, INSULATION OF BURIED SANTIARY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE REQUIRED. 12.DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE TYPE SDR-7 PE FOR SERVICES LESS THAN 1" AND SDR-9 PE FOR SERVICES GREATER THAN 1" AND LESS THAN 2" , UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO CENTERLINE OF PIPE OR FITTING. 14.THE PIPE GRADES SHOWN ARE CALCULATED FROM ACTUAL DISTANCES, EDGE-OF-MANHOLE TO EDGE-OF-MANHOLE FOR BOTH SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN AS APPLICABLE. THE DISPLAYED PIPE LINEAL FEET REFLECTS THE DISTANCE FROM CENTER-OF-MANHOLE TO CENTER-OF-MANHOLE ON ALL GRAVITY PIPING. 15.LAY PIPE TO UNIFORM GRADE BETWEEN INDICATED ELEVATION POINTS. 16.SIZE OF FITTINGS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS SHALL CORRESPOND TO ADJACENT STRAIGHT RUN OF PIPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TYPE OF JOINT AND FITTING MATERIAL SHALL BE THE SAME AS SHOWN FOR ADJACENT STRAIGHT RUN OF PIPE. 17.THRUST BLOCKS ARE NOT GENERALLY SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL FITTINGS, INCLUDING BENDS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN ELEVEN AND ONE-QUARTER DEGREES (11.25°), TEES, AND PLUGS, SHALL BE THRUST BLOCKED IN CONFORMANCE WITH MPWSS, CITY OF LAUREL MODIFICATIONS TO THE MPWSS, OR MUST HAVE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED JOINTS WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 18.ALL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THRUST BLOCKING AND VALVE BOXES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPWSS AND CITY OF LAUREL STANDARDS. 19.VALVE BOXES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL VALVES IN A BURIED SERVICE. 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL NEW AND EXISTING VALVE BOXES, CURB BOXES, AND MANHOLES TO FINAL GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION. ANY BOXES OR MANHOLES DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR ANY SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL NOT BE MADE. 23.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LAUREL WATER DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. DETAIL AND SECTION DESIGNATION A - X-X SECTION (LETTER) OR DETAIL (NUMERAL) DESIGNATION DRAWING NUMBER (OR SAME DRAWING) ON DRAWING WHERE SECTION OR DETAIL IS TAKEN: DRAWING NUMBER WHERE SHOWN ON DRAWING WHERE SECTION OR DETAIL IS SHOWN: DRAWING NUMBER(S) WHERE TAKEN Know what's below. before you dig.Call R ENTITY POWER & GAS PROJECT CONTACT LIST FIRM OR AGENCY ADDRESS CONTACT PHONE & EMAIL NORTHWESTERN ENERGY 1944 MONAD ROAD BILLINGS, MT 59102 TAYLOR ERSKINE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER (406)655-2539 Taylor.Erskine@northwestern.com TELEPHONE CENTURYLINK 2525 KING AVE WEST BILLINGS, MT 59102 CHRIS WILLIAMS (FIELD ENGINEER) (406)598-8554 christopher.williams1@centurlink.com BROADBAND CABLE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 1860 MONAD ROAD BILLINGS, MT 59102 MATT COLE (406) 200-7725 matthew.cole@charter.com GAS MONTANA-DAKOTA UTILITIES CO. 5181 SOUTHGATE DRIVE BILLINGS, MT 59101 ERIN ROBBINS (ENERGY SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE) (406)896-4241 erin.king@mdu.com CITY ENGINEERING CITY OF LAUREL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 115 WEST 1ST STREET LAUREL, MT 59044 KURT MARKEGARD (DIRECTOR) (406) 628-4796 kmarkegard@laurel.mt.gov CITY PLANNING & ZONING CITY OF LAUREL PLANNING DEPARTMENT FORREST SANDERSON (KLJ ENGINEERING) (406) 245-5499 forrest.sanderson@kljeng.com WATER & SANITARY SEWER CITY OF LAUREL UTILITY DIVISION 115 WEST 1ST STREET LAUREL, MT 59044 NATHAN HERMAN (406) 628-4410 nherman@laurel.mt.gov ENGINEER OF CONTENT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.2880 TECHNOLOGY BLVD W BOZEMAN, MT 59718 MARTIN GAGNON (406) 587-0721 mgagnon@m-m.net ENVIRONMENTAL MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.2880 TECHNOLOGY BLVD W BOZEMAN, MT 59718 CHRISTINE PEARCY (406) 587-0721 cpearcy@m-m.net 115 WEST 1ST STREET LAUREL, MT 59044 POWER & GAS YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 150 COOPERATIVE WAY HUNTLEY, MT 59037 (406)208-8323 b.koch@yvec.comBRENT KOCH SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES: * THE BELOW NOTES APPLY ONLY TO S-1 THROUGH S-6. 1.CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE OF PROTECTIVE ROAD BOX WHEN LOCATED WITHIN ASPHALT ROADWAY AND BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADE PER MPWSS DETAIL 02213-2. 2.SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH UTILIZING TYPE 1 TRENCH BACKFILL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02221-1. 3.WATER MAIN AND SEWER MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. WHERE SEWER MAIN AND WATER MAINS CROSS A MINIMUM 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. SEE MPWSS DETAIL 02660-2. 4.SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02720-3. 5.ECCENTRIC SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE UTILIZED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02720-5. MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE ROTATED TOWARD CENTERLINE OF ROAD. 6.SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE COVERS SHALL BE PER MPWSS DETAILS 02720-8 & 9. 7.SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CHANNELS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 0.2 FOOT DROP ACROSS MANHOLE AND CHANNELS GROUTED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02720-7. 8.SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADE PER MPWSS DETAIL 02213-1. 9.SANITARY SEWER SERVICE STUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02730-2 AND 3. 10.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONNECTIONS TO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. WATER GENERAL NOTES: * THE BELOW NOTES APPLY ONLY TO W-1 THROUGH W-6. 1.WATER VALVES SHOULD BE INSTALLED INSIDE OF PROTECTIVE ROAD BOX AND BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADE PER MPWSS DETAIL 02213-2. 2.WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH UTILIZING TYPE 1 TRENCH BACKFILL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02221-1. 3.WATER FITTINGS AND APPURTENANCE SHALL BE OF MECHANICAL JOINT TYPE AND FULLY RESTRAINED (EBAA MEGALUG®SIGMA ONE-LOCTM, APPROVED EQUIVALENT) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. FITTINGS SHALL MEET AWWA C153 OR C110. 4.IF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS ARE REQUIRED OR ELECTED: 4.1.THRUST BLOCKS FOR FITTINGS AND BENDS GREATER THAN 22.5° SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-1. 4.2.THRUST BLOCKS FOR APPURTENANCES AND VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-3. 5.WATER MAIN AND SEWER MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. WHERE SEWER MAIN AND WATER MAINS CROSS A MINIMUM 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. SEE MPWSS DETAIL 02660-2. 6.BLOWOFF VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE OF PROTECTIVE ROAD BOX AND INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-7. 7.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONNECTIONS TO ALL EXISTING FACILITIES. 8.WATER SERVICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SDR-7 PE PIPE AND INCLUDE CURB STOP AT THEIR TERMINATION POINT SHOWN. SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH MPWSS DETAIL 02660-6 EXCEPT THE LOCATION OF THE CURB STOP SHALL BE LOCATED 10 FEET BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. CURB STOP/BOX SHALL BE LOCATED AS DESIGNATED ABOVE BY STATION AND OFFSET. CORPORATION STOP AND CURB STOP/BOX MATERIALS SHALL BE PER CITY OF LAUREL REQUIREMENTS. 9.TRACER WIRE MUST BE INSTALLED ALONG ALL NEW WATER PIPING PER CITY OF LAUREL REQUIREMENTS AND BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY CITY PERSONNEL PRIOR TO PAVEMENT. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE-PAVE WALKTHROUGH WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO FINAL ASPHALT PLACEMENT. 11.ONCE ALL PIPING IS COMPLETE AND TESTED, THE CONTRACTOR AND CITY OF LAUREL PERSONNEL SHALL SCHEDULE A FINAL WALKTHROUGH TO VERIFY ALL VALVES ARE OPEN. ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES: * THE BELOW NOTES APPLY ONLY TO R-1 THROUGH R-6. 1.STORM SEWER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH UTILIZING TYPE 1 TRENCH BACKFILL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02221-1. 2.WATER MAIN AND STORM SEWER MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. WHERE SEWER MAIN AND WATER MAINS CROSS A MINIMUM 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. SEE MPWSS DETAIL 02660-2. 3.STORM SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02720-3. 4.MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE ROTATED TOWARD CENTERLINE OF ROAD. 5.INLETS SHALL BE EJIW 7030Z1 FRAME & 7030MG GRATE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6.ALL STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES SHALL INCLUDE A 1.5-FT SUMP. 7.MANHOLE FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADE PER MPWSS DETAIL 02213-1. 8.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONNECTIONS TO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 9.ALL PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER. LOT OWNERS SHALL INSTALL SIDEWALK FRONTAGES WHEN RESIDENCE IS BUILT. 325 SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S S S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S 8S 8S 8 S WS WS O O [][][][][][][][] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYH GV GV DYH S S S S S S SS S S SS SS S S S S WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV T TT TWV WV WV WV TTT WV WV S W BLOCK 10 LOT 17 BLOCK 10 LOT 16 BLOCK 10 LOT 15 BLOCK 10 LOT 14 BLOCK 10 LOT 13 BLOCK 10 LOT 12 BLOCK 10 LOT 11 BLOCK 10 LOT 10 BLOCK 10 LOT 9 BLOCK 10 LOT 8 BLOCK 10 LOT 7 BLOCK 10 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 5 BLOCK 9 LOT 4 BLOCK 9 LOT 3 BLOCK 6 LOT 2 BLOCK 6 LOT 3 BLOCK 6 LOT 4 BLOCK 6 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 LOT 6 BLOCK 6 LOT 7 BLOCK 6 LOT 8 BLOCK 7 LOT 2 BLOCK 7 LOT 3 BLOCK 7 LOT 4 BLOCK 7 LOT 5 O.S. 03 BLOCK 7 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 BLOCK 10 LOT 18 BLOCK 8 LOT 2 BLOCK 8 LOT 1 BLOCK 8 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 2 BLOCK 9 LOT 1 BLOCK 9 LOT 10 BLOCK 9 LOT 9 BLOCK 9 LOT 8 BLOCK 9 LOT 7 BLOCK 9 LOT 6 O.S. 02 BLOCK 8 LOT 7 BLOCK 8 LOT 5 BLOCK 8 LOT 4 O.S. 01 BLOCK 10 LOT 6 BLOCK 10 LOT 5 BLOCK 10 LOT 4 BLOCK 10 LOT 2 BLOCK 10 LOT 1 BLOCK 8 LOT 6 L55 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S S S S VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S H E E T G U I D E . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/25/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA SHEET INDEX 6683.001 2 C-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 0 SCALE IN FEET 80 1608040 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 SHEETS R-2, W-2 AND S-2 SHEETS R-3, W-3 AND S-3 SHEETS R-6, W-6 AND S-6 BIG D I T C H W. MARYLAND LANE CHERR Y H I L L S D R I V E CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 3RD FILING ELENA SUBDIVISION - 2ND FILING SHEETS R-4, W-4 AND S-4 SHEETS R-5, W-5 AND S-5 SHEETS R-1, W-1 AND S-1NW. MARYLAND LANE SO P H I A L A N E 326 3350 3360 3370 3350 3360 3370 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 2 0 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 4 6+25 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 2 5 8+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 1 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 8 0 9+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 7 6 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 6 4 10+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 9 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 8 5 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 0 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 12+25 0.50% VPI STA=7+24.66 VPI ELEV=3362.74 K=1846.59 LVC=100.00' HP STA 7+74.66 HP ELEV=3362.99 VPC STA=6+74.66 VPC ELEV=3362.47 VPT STA=7+74.66 VPT ELEV=3362.99 129.46 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.36% 228.30 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.76% 71.63 24" Ø A-2000 PVC 1.05% M-03B_INLET STA 11+17.18 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3364.14 18" INV IN (W) = 3360.52 15" INV IN (S) = 3360.52 18" INV OUT (E) = 3360.52 SUMP = 3359.02 M-10_INLET STA 6+89.07 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3361.99 24" INV IN (W) = 3356.94 24" INV IN (N) = 3356.94 30" INV OUT (E) = 3356.94 SUMP = 3355.44 201.16 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.95% M-08_INLET STA 7+60.13 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.37 18" INV IN (W) = 3357.65 24" INV OUT (E) = 3357.65 SUMP = 3356.15 M-05_INLET STA 9+86.65 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3363.50 18" INV IN (W) = 3360.07 18" INV OUT (S) = 3360.07 SUMP = 3358.57 CR O S S I N G C E N T E R L I N E SO P H I A L A N E ST A 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 STORM CULVERT CROSSING STA 10+16.22 TOP = 3359.63 BOT = 3358.12 SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD S D S D SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD 8 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 6W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] S S SS WV WV WV WV WVWV7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 PR C : 1 1 + 7 0 . 8 2 M-04_INLET STA 11+17.15, 23.50 LT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3364.14 15" INV OUT (N) = 3360.71 47.00 24" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.44% 70.48 24" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.26% 47.00 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 1.64% 33 6 0 3 3 6 0 33 6 0 3 3 6 0 3 3 6 0 336 5 47.02 15" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.43% M-06_INLET STA 9+86.65, 23.50 LT INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMBINATION MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3363.49 18" INV IN (N) = 3359.36 18" INV OUT (E) = 3359.36 SUMP = 3357.86 M-09_INLET STA 6+89.07, 23.50 RT INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMBINATION MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.00 24" INV IN (W) = 3357.13 24" INV OUT (S) = 3357.13 SUMP = 3355.63 M-07_INLET STA 7+60.13, 23.50 RT INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMBINATION MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.37 24" INV IN (NW) = 3357.30 24" INV OUT (E) = 3357.30 SUMP = 3355.80 M-05_INLET STA 9+86.65, 23.50 RT M-08_INLET STA 7+60.13, -23.51 LTM-10_INLET STA 6+89.07, -23.50 LT M-03B_INLET STA 11+17.18, 23.52 RT 3360 3360 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+25 TO 12+25 6683.001 3 R-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 49' TBC-TBC, 9.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TY P . ) W. MARYLAND LANE SO P H I A L A N E SEE SHEET R-6 FUTURE SDWK SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CLEAN EDGE. APPLY TACK COAT TO EDGE PRIOR TO PAVING AND DISPOSE OF ASPHALT AND CURB SECTIONS BEGIN NEW ASPHALT TRANSITION TO EXISTING STA 6+65 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) R15 ' R 1 5 ' KEY NOTES: PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE STEEL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. INSTALL 3" MINIMUM BASE COURSE ON TOP OF COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. 1 1 1 1 MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.)INSTALL 116 LF OF 18" CMP CULVERT W/ F.E.S. INV IN (N) = 3358.94 INV OUT (S) = 3357.26 EXISTING GRAVEL TURN AROUND TO BE REMOVED REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CULVERT INSTALL 30" A-2000 PVC COUPLING STA 6+80 INSTALL 30" A-2000 PVC COUPLING STA 6+80 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CULVERT 327 MARYLAND LANE 3354 3360 3370 3380 3354 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 5 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 7 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 2 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 4 13+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 0 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 2 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 7 5 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 9 2 14+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 5 7 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 6 7 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 1 2 15+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 6 16+00 FG - 3 3 7 4 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 7 5 FG - 3 3 7 5 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 0 2 17+00 FG - 3 3 7 7 . 1 7 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 8 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 6 . 2 8 18+00 1.51% 3.05% VPI STA=12+36.47 VPI ELEV=3365.28 K=98.63 LVC=100.00' LP STA 11+86.47 LP ELEV=3365.03 VPC STA=11+86.47 VPC ELEV=3365.03 VPT STA=12+86.47 VPT ELEV=3366.04 VPI STA=14+80.98 VPI ELEV=3368.97 K=81.69 LVC=125.41' LP STA 14+18.28 LP ELEV=3368.03 VPC STA=14+18.28 VPC ELEV=3368.03 VPT STA=15+43.69 VPT ELEV=3370.88 M-03_INLET STA 13+12.42 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø STORM DRAIN MH COVER RIM = 3365.87 12" INV IN (W) = 3362.38 12" INV IN (S) = 3362.38 18" INV OUT (E) = 3362.38 201.16 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.95% M-01_INLET STA 14+29.03 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3367.64 12" INV IN (NW) = 3363.36 12" INV OUT (E) = 3363.36 SUMP = 3361.86 CR O S S I N G C E N T E R L I N E CH E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E - 4 T H F I L I N G ST A 1 3 + 4 3 . 0 3 122.36 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.83% SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSD S D S D S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W S S S S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S SS SS SS SS SS S S S S SS S S S S SS SS S S S S SS SS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS S S S S S WV WV WV WV 12 + 0 0 1 3 + 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 1 5 + 0 0 1 6 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 18 + 0 0 P R C : 1 4 + 6 3 . 7 7 PT : 1 6 + 8 1 . 7 9 PI : 1 7 + 8 1 . 8 3 47.00 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 2.09% 33 6 5 3 3 7 0 33 7 0 337 0 33 7 5 337 5 33 7 5 336 5 33 7 0 3 3 7 5 M-02_INLET STA 13+12.42, 23.50 LT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3365.89 12" INV OUT (N) = 3363.30 M-01_INLET STA 14+29.03, 23.50 RT M-03_INLET STA 13+12.42, 23.50 RT PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+25 TO 18+00 6683.001 4 R-2 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 49' TBC-TBC, 9.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 10' PUBL I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) W. MARY L A N D L A N E C H E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E SEE SHEET R-5 FUTU R E S D W K PROPOSED FUTURE BRIDGE PROPOSED FUTURE BRIDGE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) EXISTING BURIED POWER (TYP.) EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP.) BIG D I T C H C A N A L EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) R1 5 ' R15' EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SEWER MAIN KEY NOTES: PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE STEEL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. INSTALL 3" MINIMUM BASE COURSE ON TOP OF COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. 1 1 1 1 MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.)PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) NW. MAR Y L A N D L A N E END SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION STA 14+77.74 INSTALL DEAD END BARRICADE 328 OPEN SPAC E 0 1 26162 sq.ft. SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S 6 W S S S SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS SS S S SS SS SS SS WSSS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS SS S S SS 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4 + 0 0 5 + 0 0 6 + 0 0 35.00 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.44% 35.00 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.44% 35.00 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.44% 33 6 5 3365 3370 3 3 7 0 3370 337 0 CH-04_INLET STA 4+16.52, -17.50 LT CH-05_INLET STA 2+60.54, 17.50 RT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3368.44 18" INV OUT (S) = 3364.39 CH-03_INLET STA 4+16.52, 17.50 RT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3369.15 12" INV OUT (S) = 3365.14 CH-07_INLET STA 1+49.18, 17.50 RT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3369.87 12" INV OUT (S) = 3363.53 CH-08_INLET STA 1+49.18, -17.50 LT CH-06_INLET STA 2+60.54, -17.50 LT 3370 3365 3370 3365 3355 3360 3370 3380 3355 3360 3370 3380 FG - EG - 3 3 7 0 . 7 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 4 4 1+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 8 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 8 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 3 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 6 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 1 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 2 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 6 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 0 1 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 0 2 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 5+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 -2.01% 0.50% VPI STA=5+00.03 VPI ELEV=3370.01 K=1403.49 LVC=100.00' LP STA 4+50.03 LP ELEV=3369.76 VPC STA=4+50.03 VPC ELEV=3369.76 VPT STA=5+50.03 VPT ELEV=3370.30 VPI STA=2+30.46 VPI ELEV=3368.67 K=39.84 LVC=100.00' LP STA 2+60.54 LP ELEV=3368.87 VPC STA=1+80.46 VPC ELEV=3369.67 VPT STA=2+80.46 VPT ELEV=3368.92 111.86 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.80% CH-08_INLET STA 1+49.18 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3369.87 12" INV IN (N) = 3363.39 18" INV IN (W) = 3363.39 18" INV OUT (SW) = 3363.39 SUMP = 3361.89 CH-04_INLET STA 4+16.52 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3369.18 12" INV IN (N) = 3365.00 18" INV OUT (E) = 3365.00 SUMP = 3363.50 150.85 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.51% CR O S S I N G C E N T E R L I N E SO P H I A L A N E ST A 5 + 2 6 . 3 0 CH-06_INLET STA 2+60.54 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3368.44 18" INV IN (W) = 3364.25 18" INV IN (N) = 3364.25 18" INV OUT (E) = 3364.25 SUMP = 3362.75 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 6683.001 5 R-3 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SO P H I A L A N E SEE SHEET R-6 FUTURE SDWK BEGIN NEW ASPHALT TRANSITION TO EXISTING STA. 0+29.29 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE CHERRY HILLS DRIVE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 37' TBC-TBC, 5.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) R 1 5 ' R15' PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) KEY NOTES: PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE STEEL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. INSTALL 3" MINIMUM BASE COURSE ON TOP OF COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. 1 1 1 1 M A T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 INSTALL 106 LF OF 18" CMP CULVERT W/ F.E.S. INV IN (NW) = 3364.19 INV OUT (SE) = 3363.14 PROPOSED CULVERT PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CLEAN EDGE. APPLY TACK COAT TO EDGE PRIOR TO PAVING AND DISPOSE OF ASPHALT AND CURB SECTIONS PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING GRAVEL TURN AROUND TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) 329 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W SS SS SS 6W 6 W S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S S S W S W S W S W S 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9 + 0 0 1 0 + 0 0 1 1 + 0 0 3 3 6 5 3 3 7 0 33 7 0 3370 3370 3360 3370 3380 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 5+50 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 6 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 7 3 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 1 8+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 2 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 9+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 8 2 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 6 10+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 0.57% VPI STA=10+28.45 VPI ELEV=3373.03 K=45.82 LVC=100.00' HP STA 10+04.62 HP ELEV=3372.82 VPC STA=9+78.45 VPC ELEV=3372.75 VPT STA=10+78.45 VPT ELEV=3372.23 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 2.55 5 10 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 6683.001 6 R-4 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 37' TBC-TBC, 5.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CHERRY HILLS DRIVE FUTURE SDWK PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 330 S D SD S D S D S D 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S W S W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S SS WS WS WS WV 10+ 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 1 3 + 0 0 1 3 + 4 3 M-01_INLET STA 13+12.35, -40.05 LT 35.00 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 2.73% 3370 337 0 CH-01_INLET STA 12+87.31, 17.50 RT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3368.43 12" INV OUT (E) = 3364.75 CH-02_INLET STA 12+87.31, -17.50 LT 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 10+50 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 3 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 8 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 4 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 9 7 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 6 13+00 FG - EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 2 13+43 -1.61% 2.38% 33.69 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 1.70% M-01_INLET STA 13+12.35 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3367.64 12" INV IN (NW) = 3363.36 12" INV OUT (E) = 3363.36 SUMP = 3361.86 CH-02_INLET STA 12+87.31 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3368.43 12" INV IN (W) = 3363.87 12" INV OUT (SE) = 3363.87 SUMP = 3362.37 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 6683.001 7 R-5 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 KEY NOTES: PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE STEEL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. INSTALL 3" MINIMUM BASE COURSE ON TOP OF COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT 10' P U B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEE SHEET R-2 FUTURE S D W K PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE CHERRY HILLS DRIVE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 37' TBC-TBC, 5.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 N W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER (TYP.) EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) R1 5 ' R1 5 ' GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. 1 1 1 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.)PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E 331 SD SD SD SD SD S D SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S D S D S D SD S D SD SD SD SD S D S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 6W 6W SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS S S S S S S SS WS WS W S W S W S W S WS WS W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS WS SS SS SS SS WSWS SSSSSS S S WV W V W V P C : 1 + 5 5 . 5 0 PT : 2 + 4 4 . 7 8 0 + 0 0 1 + 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 5+ 2 6 35.00 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 3.77% 35.00 12" Ø A-2000 PVC 1.41% 3 3 7 0 33 6 5 3365 33 6 5 3 3 6 5 S-04_INLET STA 0+52.32, 17.50 LT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.91 18" INV OUT (E) = 3358.61 S-02_INLET STA 1+82.94, 17.50 LT INSTALL NEW 24" X 36" INLET GRATE @ FL = 3365.39 12" INV OUT (E) = 3360.50 S-01B_INLET STA 4+89.90, 17.50 RT S-01_INLET STA 1+82.94, 17.50 RT CH-08_INLET STA 5+05.82, 34.48 RT M-07_INLET STA 0+23.40, 46.38 RT S-03_INLET STA 0+52.32, 17.50 RT 3365 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 5 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 1 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 3 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 0 1+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 6 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 2 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 8 4 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 5 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 0 5 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 3 6 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 5 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 5+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 1 5+26 129.40 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 2.11% 40.87 24" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.27% 304.05 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 1.07% 23.28 18" Ø A-2000 PVC 0.60% M-07_INLET STA 0+23.40 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.37 24" INV IN (NW) = 3357.30 24" INV OUT (E) = 3357.30 SUMP = 3355.80 S-03_INLET STA 0+52.32 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3362.91 18" INV IN (N) = 3357.40 18" INV IN (W) = 3357.40 24" INV OUT (SE) = 3357.40 SUMP = 3355.90 S-01_INLET STA 1+82.94 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3365.42 18" INV IN (N) = 3360.05 12" INV IN (W) = 3360.05 18" INV OUT (S) = 3360.05 SUMP = 3358.55 S-01B_INLET STA 4+89.90 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3368.61 18" INV IN (NE) = 3363.27 18" INV OUT (S) = 3363.27 SUMP = 3361.77 CH-08_INLET STA 5+05.82 INSTALL NEW 48" Ø COMB. MH/INLET GRATE @ FL = 3369.87 12" INV IN (N) = 3363.39 18" INV IN (W) = 3363.39 18" INV OUT (SW) = 3363.39 SUMP = 3361.89 VPI STA=2+70.45 VPI ELEV=3366.47 K=202.63 LVC=100.00' LP STA 2+20.45 LP ELEV=3366.11 VPC STA=2+20.45 VPC ELEV=3366.11 VPT STA=3+20.45 VPT ELEV=3367.08 1.22% -1.99% 2.15% 0.73% PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ R O A D A N D S T O R M . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA SOPHIA LANE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 6683.001 8 R-6 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ( T Y P . ) CH E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E SOPHIA LANE SEE SHEET R-1 SEE SHEET R-3 FUTURE SDWK SOPHIA LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL & TYPE 1 BEDDING 37' TBC-TBC, 5.5' BLVD, & 5' SIDEWALKS STRUCTURAL SECTION PER DETAIL SHEET D-3 W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CONTOURS (TYP.) PROPOSED FINISH GRADE SURFACE EXISTING GRADE SURFACE PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) R 1 5 ' R15 ' R1 5 ' R 1 5 ' KEY NOTES: PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE STEEL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. INSTALL 3" MINIMUM BASE COURSE ON TOP OF COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR ROAD & STORM GENERAL NOTES. 2. FG AND EG PROFILE SHOWN REPRESENTS ROAD CL. 1 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) 332 SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD S D S D SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD S S SS WV WV WV WV WV WV 8 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 6W SSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WSWS WS WS WS 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 BLOCK 7 LOT 1 10171 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 1 9626 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 1 9153 sq.ft. NEW 12" GATE VALVE STA 8+19.54, 3.45' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 6+78.70, 49.99' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 7+50.55, 50.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 8+26.34, 50.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 9+21.61, 50.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 11+50.84, 49.95' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+43.71, 49.99' LT 7613 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 8 7654 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 7 7579 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 6 7572 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 5 9353 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 4 10385 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 3NEW 12" GATE VALVE STA 8+09.55, 3.61' LT NEW 12"x8" TEE STA. 8+14.54, 3.52' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+13.67, 50.07' RT 3350 3360 3370 3350 3360 3370 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 2 0 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 4 6+25 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 2 5 8+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 1 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 8 0 9+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 7 6 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 6 4 10+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 9 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 8 5 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 0 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 12+25 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 6+95.80 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 6+89.07 TOP = 3359.03 BOT = 3356.98 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 9+86.65 TOP = 3361.22 BOT = 3359.68 STORM CULVERT CROSSING STA 10+16.22 TOP = 3359.63 BOT = 3358.12 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 11+17.16 TOP = 3361.87 BOT = 3360.59 12" GATE VALVE STA 8+09.55 INV = 3353.42 12" GATE VALVE STA 8+19.54 INV = 3353.45 12"x8" TEE STA 8+14.54 12" INV = 3353.43 1" WTR SVC STA 12+12.15 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 11+24.01 1" WTR SVC STA 6+76.48 1" WTR SVC STA 7+49.27 1" WTR SVC STA 8+25.88 1" WTR SVC STA 9+22.67 1" WTR SVC STA 11+54.02 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 6+27.62 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 8+34.14 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 11+64.19 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 7+66.89 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+25 TO 12+25 6683.001 9 W-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 SO P H I A L A N E FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING SEWER MAIN PROPOSED STORM MAIN W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING W. MARYLAND LANE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) SEE SHEET W-6 GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 REMOVE EXISTING GATE VALVE PROPOSED STORM CULVERT CROSSING INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 EXISTING WATER MAIN 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING GATE VALVE 333 SD S D SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S S S S S WV WV WV WV T S 8W 8W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W S S S S 8S 8 S 8S 8 S 8 S 8S SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S SS S S S S SS SS S S S S SSSS SS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS 12 + 0 0 13 + 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 1 5 + 0 0 16 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 18 + 0 0 BLOCK 1 0 LOT 17 10048 s q . f t . BLOCK 9 LOT 4 9774 sq . f t . BLOCK 9 7919 sq . f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 2 9892 sq . f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 1 13519 s q . f t . BLOCK 1 0 LOT 18 11584 s q . f t . BLOCK 9 LOT 2 8086 sq . f t . NEW 12" GATE VALVE STA 14+77.36, 6.25' LT NEW 12"x8" TEE STA. 14+82.03, 5.72' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+43.71, 49.99' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 13+40.93, 49.66' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 14+98.30, 50.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 13+51.72, 50.05' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+85.89, 49.90' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 17+57.47, 50.00' RT 10385 s q . f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 3 7919 s q . f t . BLO C K 9 LOT 3 8086 s q . f t . BLO C K 9 LOT 2 9892 sq . f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 2 13519 s q . f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 1 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 5 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 7 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 2 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 4 13+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 0 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 2 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 7 5 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 9 2 14+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 5 7 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 6 7 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 1 2 15+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 6 16+00 FG - 3 3 7 4 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 7 5 FG - 3 3 7 5 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 0 2 17+00 FG - 3 3 7 7 . 1 7 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 8 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 6 . 2 8 18+00 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 13+12.42 TOP = 3363.84 BOT = 3362.82 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 12+51.47 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 13+52.65 1" WTR SVC STA 12+95.84 1" WTR SVC STA 13+30.21 1" WTR SVC STA 13+46.63 1" WTR SVC STA 14+98.30 1" WTR SVC STA 17+57.45 1" WTR SVC STA 12+42.36 12" GATE VALVE STA 14+77.36 INV = 3359.95 12"x8" TEE STA 14+82.03 12" INV = 3359.95 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+25 TO 18+00 6683.001 10 W-2 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 2.55 5 10 1020 20 40 W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING SEWER MAIN C H E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E PROPOSED STORM MAIN NW. MARYLAN D L A N E EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.)PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER (TYP). EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP). EXISTING BURIED POWER (TYP). GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) W. MARYLAND L A N E EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE (TYP.) INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 EXISTING GATE VALVE (TYP.) PROPOSED FUTURE BRIDGE 334 SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S D SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S 6 W S S S SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS SS SS S S SS SS SS WSSS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5 + 0 0 6 + 0 0 8S8S8S 8W8W8W S BLOCK 10 LOT 3 9081 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 5 8292 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 11911 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 2 8465 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 1 7834 sq.ft. OPEN SPAC E 0 1 26162 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 6 10155 sq.ft. 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 0+34.29, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 0+73.49, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 2+50.09, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+30.17, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+09.10, 39.97' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 1+16.47, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+93.97, 39.95' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 4+70.43, 39.91' RT1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+99.80, 40.00' RT 9081 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 3 NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+45.31, 3.25' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+55.23, 3.62' RT HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3370.39' DEPTH = 9.0' STA. 5+49.63, 21.50' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 1+92.50, 4.26' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 3+07.18, 6.14' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+97.37, 7.12' RT HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3369.12' DEPTH = 9.0' STA. 3+03.67, 21.50' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 1+82.53, 3.46' RT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 1+07.34, 7.50' RT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 2+25.20, 6.89' RT 9238 sq . f t . BLOCK 1 0 LOT 4 10284 sq . f t . BLOCK 1 0 LOT 5 11884 sq . f t . BLOCK 1 0 LOT 6 NEW 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA. 1+74.88, 2.86' RT NEW 8" TEE STA. 1+87.51, 3.87' RT NEW 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA. 2+69.06, 10.41' RT NEW 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA. 4+37.46, 13.00' RT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 5+50.27, 3.41' RT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 3+02.28, 6.60' RT 3355 3360 3370 3380 3355 3360 3370 3380 FG - EG - 3 3 7 0 . 7 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 4 4 1+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 8 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 8 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 3 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 6 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 1 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 2 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 6 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 0 1 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 0 2 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 5+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 CONNECTION TO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN STA 0+39.29 INV = 3365.28 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 5+00.60 TOP = 3365.19 BOT = 3363.68 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 2+60.54 TOP = 3365.82 BOT = 3364.29 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 1+49.18 TOP = 3364.46 BOT = 3363.44 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 1+99.45 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 2+70.92 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 3+49.87 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 5+70.72 1" WTR SVC STA 0+34.29 1" WTR SVC STA 2+52.57 1" WTR SVC STA 2+92.51 1" WTR SVC STA 3+12.87 1" WTR SVC STA 3+28.82 1" WTR SVC STA 3+89.53 1" WTR SVC STA 4+03.31 1" WTR SVC STA 4+66.22 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 4+16.52 TOP = 3366.07 BOT = 3365.05 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA 1+74.88 INV = 3358.55 8" GATE VALVE STA 1+82.53 INV = 3358.12 8" GATE VALVE STA 1+92.50 INV = 3358.12 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA 2+69.06 INV = 3360.02 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+97.37 INV = 3360.04 8"x6" TEE STA 3+02.28 INV = 3360.04 8" GATE VALVE STA 3+07.18 INV = 3360.04 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA 4+37.46 INV = 3360.75 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+45.31 INV = 3361.31 8"x6" TEE STA 5+50.27 INV = 3361.31 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+55.23 INV = 3361.31 8" TEE STA 1+87.51 INV = 3358.12 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 4+11.57 1" WTR SVC STA 0+73.49 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 1+68.42 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 0+95.60 1" WTR SVC STA 1+15.75 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 6683.001 11 W-3 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 568 LF DR18 C900 PVC WATER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN CHERRY HILLS DRIVE PROPOSED STORM MAIN SO P H I A L A N E PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP). SEE SHEET W-6 GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM CULVERT CROSSING INSTALL BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET D-1 STA 0+39.29 INSTALL BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET D-1 STA 0+39.29 CONNECT TO EXST 8" WATER MAIN STA 0+39.29 335 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W SS SS SS 6W 6 W S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S W S S S W S W S W S W S 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9 + 0 0 1 0 + 0 0 1 1 + 0 0 B L O C K 1 0 L O T 1 4 7 5 7 7 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 7 5 6 0 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 L O T 7 1 2 9 2 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 5 8 6 9 5 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 1 0 9 2 2 5 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 9 9 3 7 1 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 8 1 1 5 9 2 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 7 9 9 7 4 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 6 9 8 5 6 s q . f t . 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 6+46.44, 39.88' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 6+56.44, 39.98' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 7+50.50, 39.98' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 8+46.63, 40.14' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 9+44.78, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 10+22.21, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 10+48.28, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 9+80.00, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 9+08.01, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 7+86.57, 39.89' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 7+19.24, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 8+50.39, 39.94' RT 12926 s q . f t . BLOC K 1 0 LOT 7 10304 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 8 8592 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 9 7639 s q . f t . BLOC K 1 0 LOT 1 0 7554 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 1 1 7532 s q . f t . BLOC K 1 0 LOT 1 2 7560 s q . f t . BLOC K 1 0 LOT 1 3 7577 s q . f t . BLOC K 1 0 LOT 1 4 INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 10+41.73, 3.84' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+45.31, 3.25' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 5+55.23, 3.62' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 9+11.40, 4.20' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 9+21.40, 4.18' RT HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3372.48' DEPTH = 7.5' STA. 9+16.44, 21.50' RT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 5+50.27, 3.41' RT NEW 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA. 6+20.51, 11.44' RT NEW 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA. 8+17.15, 12.06' RT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 9+16.38, 4.18' RT 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 5+50 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 6 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 7 3 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 1 8+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 2 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 9+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 8 2 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 6 10+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 6+51.77 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 7+30.78 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 7+95.06 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 8+60.40 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 9+36.81 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 9+89.31 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 10+57.59 1" WTR SVC STA 6+41.57 1" WTR SVC STA 6+62.19 1" WTR SVC STA 7+19.40 1" WTR SVC STA 7+47.54 1" WTR SVC STA 7+91.35 1" WTR SVC STA 8+46.87 1" WTR SVC STA 8+52.11 1" WTR SVC STA 9+07.91 1" WTR SVC STA 9+44.90 1" WTR SVC STA 9+79.90 1" WTR SVC STA 10+22.33 1" WTR SVC STA 10+48.18 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA 6+20.51 INV = 3362.19 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA 8+17.15 INV = 3364.38 8" GATE VALVE STA 9+11.40 INV = 3364.87 8"x6" TEE STA 9+16.38 INV = 3364.90 8" GATE VALVE STA 9+21.40 INV = 3364.88 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 6683.001 12 W-4 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 508 LF DR18 C900 PVC WATER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CHERRY HILLS DRIVE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP). FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINEEXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN 336 S D SD S D S D S D WV 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S W S W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S SS WS WS WS 10+ 0 0 11 + 0 0 1 2 + 0 0 1 3 + 0 0 1 3 + 4 3 BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 7 10 0 4 8 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 4 75 7 7 s q . f t . BL O C K 9 LO T 4 97 7 4 s q . f t . BL O C K 9 LO T 5 86 9 5 s q . f t . HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3368.76' DEPTH = 7.5' STA. 13+00.01, 21.50' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 10+22.21, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 10+48.28, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 11+07.94, 39.86' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 11+35.41, 39.98' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 11+47.04, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+71.30, 39.99' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 12+36.92, 39.93' RT1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 11+87.76, 39.88' RT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 12+65.77, 12.59' RT BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 5 76 6 1 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 6 12 4 4 2 s q . f t . NEW 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA. 11+26.95, 10.46' RT NEW 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA. 11+79.77, 12.56' RT NEW 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA. 12+57.94, 12.98' RT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 12+99.47, 10.89' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 12+94.48, 11.16' RT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 13+04.47, 10.66' RT 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 12+87.31 TOP = 3365.31 BOT = 3364.29 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 10+50 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 3 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 8 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 4 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 9 7 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 6 13+00 FG - EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 2 13+43 1" WTR SVC STA 11+49.47 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 11+71.48 1" WTR SVC STA 12+73.91 1" WTR SVC STA 12+40.34 1" WTR SVC STA 11+83.86 1" WTR SVC STA 11+33.44 1" WTR SVC STA 11+13.12 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA 11+26.95 INV = 3364.13 8"x22 1/2° ELBOW STA 11+79.77 INV = 3363.32 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA 12+57.94 INV = 3362.04 8" GATE VALVE STA 12+94.48 INV = 3361.27 8"x6" TEE STA 12+99.47 INV = 3361.18 8" GATE VALVE STA 13+04.47 INV = 3361.05 EXISTING SEWER MAIN CROSSING STA 13+33.63 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 12+26.97 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R - W - 5 . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 6683.001 13 W-5 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 262 LF DR18 C900 PVC WATER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING 10' P U B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN CHERRY HILLS DRIV E PROPOSED STORM MAIN N W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER (TYP). SEE SHEET W-2 EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP). GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 337 SD SD SD SD SD S D SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S D SD SD SD SD SD SD S D S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 6 W 6W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S S SS SS SS SS S S SS SS SS S S S S SS WS WS WS WS W S WS WS W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS WS SS SS SS WSWS SSSSSS 0 + 0 0 1 + 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 5+ 2 6 SD SD S WV WV WV BL O C K 1 0 9 0 8 1 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 1 1 0 1 7 1 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 LO T 2 8 1 5 8 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 3 8 1 9 2 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 4 8 0 1 3 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 5 8 2 9 2 s q . f t . 91 6 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 1 96 2 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 3 8 0 8 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 4 8 2 4 9 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 5 9 2 1 9 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 L O T 2 8 4 6 5 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 6 10 1 5 5 s q . f t . NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+53.46, 3.52' LT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+43.47, 3.27' LT HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3363.31' DEPTH = 8.5' STA. 0+28.14, 37.71' LT NEW 8" GATE VALVE STA 0+32.17, 6.82' LT HYDR & LEAD VALVE ASSEMBLY PER MPWSS DETAIL 02660-4 BURY = 3366.42' DEPTH = 8.0' STA. 2+47.99, 21.50' LT NEW 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA. 4+88.22, 9.55' LT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 2+48.46, 3.39' LT NEW 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA. 2+04.00, 4.32' LT NEW 8"x6" TEE STA. 0+27.11, 6.98' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 1+11.27, 39.99' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 1+72.60, 39.89' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 2+38.18, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+09.52, 40.00' LT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+92.73, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 2+97.30, 40.00' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 2+06.59, 39.98' RT 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 1+27.71, 39.99' RT 91 6 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 2 96 2 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 1 80 8 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 3 82 4 9 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 4 1" WTR SVC CURB STOP LOCATION STA 3+98.08, 40.00' LT 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 5 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 1 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 3 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 0 1+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 6 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 2 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 8 4 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 5 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 0 5 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 3 6 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 5 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 5+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 1 5+26 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 1+20.57 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 1+89.62 SEWER SERVICE CROSSING STA 2+68.16 1" WTR SVC STA 1+10.14 1" WTR SVC STA 1+73.01 1" WTR SVC STA 2+09.63 1" WTR SVC STA 2+38.51 1" WTR SVC STA 2+96.15 1" WTR SVC STA 3+91.52 1" WTR SVC STA 1+29.10 1" WTR SVC STA 3+10.42 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 0+52.32 TOP = 3359.50 BOT = 3357.97 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 5+08.88 TOP = 3365.16 BOT = 3363.62 8"x6" TEE STA 0+27.11 INV = 3354.73 8" GATE VALVE STA 0+32.17 INV = 3354.88 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA 2+04.00 INV = 3358.01 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+43.47 INV = 3358.34 8"x6" TEE STA 2+48.46 INV = 3358.34 8" GATE VALVE STA 2+53.46 INV = 3358.34 8"x11 1/4° ELBOW STA 4+88.22 INV = 3358.12 SEWER MAIN CROSSING STA 5+15.43 EXISTING SEWER MAIN CROSSING STA 0+07.45 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 1+82.94 TOP = 3361.28 BOT = 3360.25 1" WTR SVC STA 3+98.92 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ W A T E R _ W - 6 . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA SOPHIA LANE WATER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 6683.001 14 W-6 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 SOPHIA LANE INSTALL 537 LF DR18 C900 PVC WATER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP . ) FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN CH E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E PROPOSED STORM MAIN W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) SEE SHEET W-3 SEE SHEET W-1 GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR WATER GENERAL NOTES. SOPHIA LANE PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE (TYP.) INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 338 S S SS WV WV WV WV WV 8 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 6W SSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WSWS WS WS WS 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+ 0 0 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD S D S D SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD BLOCK 7 LOT 1 10171 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 1 9626 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 1 9153 sq.ft. 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 11+64.62, 49.98' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 11+59.53, 49.98' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 11+24.45, 49.99' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB INSTALL PER DETAIL 7 SHEET D-2 STA. 8+34.00, 49.99' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB INSTALL PER DETAIL 7 SHEET D-2 STA. 7+66.91, 49.99' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB INSTALL PER DETAIL 7 SHEET D-2 STA. 6+95.86, 50.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 6+69.75, 50.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB INSTALL PER DETAIL 7 SHEET D-2 SEE NOTE 2 STA. 6+27.61, 49.95' LT 7613 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 8 7654 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 7 7579 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 6 7572 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 5 9353 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 4 10385 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 3 3350 3360 3370 3350 3360 3370 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 2 0 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 4 6+25 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 6 2 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 2 5 8+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 7 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 5 1 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 8 0 9+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 7 6 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 6 4 10+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 0 . 9 9 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 0 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 8 5 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 0 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 12+25 STORM CULVERT CROSSING STA 10+16.22 TOP = 3359.63 BOT = 3358.12 WATER MAIN CROSSING STA 8+14.48 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 11+17.16 TOP = 3361.87 BOT = 3360.59 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 9+86.65 TOP = 3361.22 BOT = 3359.68 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 6+89.07 TOP = 3359.03 BOT = 3356.98 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+50 TO 12+50 6683.001 15 S-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING W. MARYLAND LANE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING WATER MAIN SO P H I A L A N E PROPOSED STORM MAIN JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) SEE SHEET S-6 EXISTING SEWER MAIN EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) 116°57° 150° GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. 2. RESTORE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPWSS STND DWG 02221-1. NEW ASPHALT THICKNESS SHALL MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT THICKNESS AND TACK COAT ALL JOINTS. INSTALL GRAVEL SECTION PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET D-3. MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) 339 S S S S S WV WV WV WV T S 8W 8W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W S S S S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S SS S S S S SS SS S S S S SS SS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS 12 + 0 0 13 + 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 1 5 + 0 0 16 + 0 0 17 + 0 0 18 + 0 0 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 16+50.44, 49.96' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 15+05.69, 49.98' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 13+58.50, 50.03' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 13+02.30, 49.99' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 12+51.05, 49.98' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 12+32.45, 50.00' RT SD S D SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD BLOCK 1 0 LOT 17 10048 sq. f t . BLOCK 9 9774 sq.f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 2 9892 sq.ft . BLOCK 6 LOT 3 10385 sq. f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 1 13519 sq. f t . BLOCK 1 0 LOT 18 11584 sq. f t . 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 11+64.62, 49.98' LT MH-(11) STA 14+58.33, 7.25' RT BLOCK 9 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 13+49.05, 49.57' LT 8086 s q . f t . BLOC K 9 LOT 2 7919 s q . f t . BLOC K 9 LOT 3 9774 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 4 10385 sq. f t . BLOCK 6 LOT 3 7919 s q . f t . 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 1 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 7 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 5 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 1 7 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 2 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 5 4 13+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 0 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 2 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 7 5 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 9 2 14+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 5 7 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 6 7 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 1 2 15+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 6 16+00 FG - 3 3 7 4 . 1 2 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 7 5 FG - 3 3 7 5 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 0 2 17+00 FG - 3 3 7 7 . 1 7 EG - 3 3 7 3 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 8 . 6 4 EG - 3 3 7 6 . 2 8 18+00 MH-(11) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 14+58.33 RIM ELEV=3368.59 8" INV IN (N) = 3357.57 8" INV IN (W) = 3357.57 8" INV OUT (E) = 3357.37 DEPTH = 11.22' WATER MAIN CROSSING STA 14+81.42 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 13+12.42 TOP = 3363.84 BOT = 3362.82 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA W. MARYLAND LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 12+50 TO 18+00 6683.001 16 S-2 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 W. MARYLAND LANE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING W. MARY L A N D L A N E FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING WATER MAIN C H E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E PROPOSED STORM MAIN SEE SHEET S-5 EXISTING SEWER MAIN EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER (TYP.) EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP.) 90° 90° EXISTING BURIED POWER (TYP.) GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 + 2 5 EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) NW. MAR Y L A N D L A N E 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED FUTURE BRIGE 340 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S 6 W S S S SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S W S W S WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 0+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5 + 0 0 6 + 0 0 W W 8S8S8S 8W8W8W S BLOCK 10 LOT 3 9081 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 11911 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 11884 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 4 9238 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 2 8465 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 1 7834 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE 01 26162 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 6 10155 sq.ft. 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 1+67.27, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 1+99.46, 40.01' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 2+70.93, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 3+19.85, 39.98' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 3+48.72, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 4+11.69, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 5+71.33, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 5+75.69, 39.99' LT MH-(4) STA 4+72.97, 8.25' LT MH-(3) STA 3+41.81, 8.25' LT MH-(2) STA 1+75.60, 10.83' LT MH-(1) STA 0+85.60, 6.00' LT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 1+08.28, 6.01' LT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 2+25.15, 10.78' LT 8292 sq.f t . BLOCK 7 LOT 5 11911 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 10284 sq.ft . BLOCK 10 LOT 5 11884 sq.ft . BLOCK 10 LOT 6 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB INSTALL PER DETAIL 7 SHEET D-2 STA. 0+95.60, 40.00' RT 3355 3360 3370 3380 3355 3360 3370 3380 FG - EG - 3 3 7 0 . 7 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 8 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 4 4 1+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 8 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 3 3 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 8 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 3 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 3 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 6 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 1 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 1 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 2 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 6 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 0 1 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 0 2 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 5+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 MH-(1) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 0+85.60 RIM ELEV=3371.46 8" INV OUT (W) = 3362.41 DEPTH = 9.05' MH-(2) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 1+75.60 RIM ELEV=3369.55 8" INV IN (W) = 3360.29 8" INV IN (E) = 3360.29 8" INV OUT (S) = 3360.09 DEPTH = 9.46' MH-(3) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 3+41.81 RIM ELEV=3369.06 8" INV IN (W) = 3361.15 8" INV OUT (E) = 3360.95 DEPTH = 8.11' 91.05 LF 8" PVC @ 2.44% 165.29 LF 8" PVC @ 0.41% MH-(4) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 4+72.97 RIM ELEV=3369.72 8" INV IN (W) = 3361.85 8" INV OUT (E) = 3361.65 DEPTH = 8.07' 152.92 LF 8" PVC @ 0.40% STORM CULVERT CROSSING STA 5+00.60 TOP = 3365.19 BOT = 3363.68 WATER MAIN CROSSING STA 1+87.82 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 4+16.52 TOP = 3366.07 BOT = 3365.05 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 2+60.54 TOP = 3365.82 BOT = 3364.29 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 1+49.18 TOP = 3364.46 BOT = 3363.44 128.43 LF 8" PVC @ 0.40% VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 6+00 6683.001 17 S-3 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 512 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING CHERRY HILLS DRIVE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED WATER MAIN SO P H I A L A N E PROPOSED STORM MAIN JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) SEE SHEET S-6 PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) 91° 96° 166° 162° 162° GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 PROPOSED SEWER MAIN PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.)PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING 10' PUBLIC UTILITY E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) 341 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W SS SS SS6W 6W S S S SS S S SS SS S S SS SS SS S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS W S WS W S WS WS WS WS WS SS W S WS WS WS 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9 + 0 0 1 0 + 0 0 1 1 + 0 0 B L O C K 1 0 L O T 8 1 0 3 0 4 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 L O T 1 4 7 5 7 7 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 7 5 6 0 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 8 5 9 2 s q . f t . B L O C K 1 0 L O T 7 1 2 9 2 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 5 8 6 9 5 s q . f t . L O T 1 0 B L O C K 9 L O T 9 9 3 7 1 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 8 1 1 5 9 2 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 7 9 9 7 4 s q . f t . B L O C K 9 L O T 6 9 8 5 6 s q . f t . MH-(8) STA 10+72.92, 12.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 6+69.57, 39.98' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 6+50.74, 39.96' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 7+31.66, 39.98' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 7+57.46, 39.90' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 7+94.07, 39.97' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 8+61.16, 39.99' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 8+74.05, 39.96' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 9+36.61, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 9+55.26, 40.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 9+89.08, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 10+57.33, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 10+32.66, 40.00' LT MH-(7) STA 9+03.81, 8.25' LT MH-(5) STA 6+29.34, 8.25' LT MH-(6) STA 7+62.28, 8.25' LT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 10+41.24, 11.30' LT 103 0 4 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 8 859 2 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 9 763 9 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 1 0 755 4 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 1 1 753 2 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 1 2 756 0 s q . f t . BLO C K 1 0 LOT 1 3 3355 3360 3370 3380 3355 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 6 5+50 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 3 3 6+00 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 7 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 7+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 8 . 2 6 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 7 3 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 7 1 8+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 0 1 EG - 3 3 7 0 . 8 2 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 3 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 8 9+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 4 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 8 2 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 2 6 10+00 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 MH-(5) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 6+29.34 RIM ELEV=3370.59 8" INV IN (SW) = 3362.65 8" INV OUT (E) = 3362.45 DEPTH = 8.14' MH-(6) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 7+62.28 RIM ELEV=3371.35 8" INV IN (SW) = 3365.25 8" INV OUT (NE) = 3365.05 DEPTH = 6.30' 138.58 LF 8" PVC @ 0.40% MH-(7) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 9+03.81 RIM ELEV=3372.16 8" INV IN (SW) = 3365.99 8" INV OUT (NE) = 3365.79 DEPTH = 6.37' 130.18 LF 8" PVC @ 1 . 9 0 % 169.15 LF 8" PVC @ 0.41% MH-(8) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 10+72.92 RIM ELEV=3372.07 8" INV OUT (NE) = 3366.66 DEPTH = 5.41' 152.92 LF 8" PVC @ 0.40% VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 6+00 TO 11+00 6683.001 18 S-4 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 465 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND (TYP.) CHERRY HILLS DR I V E FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) 162° 163° 170° GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYP). MA T C H L I N E S T A 6 + 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASE M E N T ( T Y P . ) 342 WV 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S 8 S S S S 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S W S W S W S WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS SS WS WS WS S D SD S D S D S D 10+ 0 0 11+ 0 0 12 + 0 0 1 3 + 0 0 1 3 + 4 3 BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 7 10 0 4 8 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 5 76 6 1 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 4 75 7 7 s q . f t . BL O C K 9 LO T 4 97 7 4 s q . f t . BL O C K 6 LO T 1 13 5 1 9 s q . f t . BL O C K 9 LO T 5 86 9 5 s q . f t . MH-(8) STA 10+72.92, 12.00' LT MH-(10) STA 12+23.08, 8.25' LT MH-(9) STA 11+21.27, 8.25' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 12+28.95, 39.28' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 11+71.58, 39.50' RT MH-(11) STA 13+33.15, 12.69' LTINSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 12+65.84, 10.16' LT BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 5 76 6 1 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 6 12 4 4 2 s q . f t . BL O C K 1 0 LO T 1 7 10 4 8 s q . f t . 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 7 2 . 6 0 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 1 10+50 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 8 EG - 3 3 7 2 . 2 0 11+00 FG - 3 3 7 1 . 0 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 8 3 FG - 3 3 7 0 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 7 1 . 1 8 12+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 4 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 9 7 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 9 . 0 6 13+00 FG - EG - 3 3 6 8 . 7 2 13+43 MH-(9) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 11+21.27 RIM ELEV=3371.37 8" INV OUT (S) = 3365.48 DEPTH = 5.89' 95.43 LF 8" PVC @ 1.49 % MH-(10) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 12+23.08 RIM ELEV=3369.74 8" INV IN (N) = 3364.12 8" INV OUT (S) = 3363.92 DEPTH = 5.82'109.63 LF 8" PVC @ 6.01% MH-(11) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 13+33.15 RIM ELEV=3368.59 8" INV IN (N) = 3357.57 8" INV IN (W) = 3357.57 8" INV OUT (E) = 3357.37 DEPTH = 11.22' STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 12+87.31 TOP = 3365.31 BOT = 3364.29 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R - S - 5 A N D S - 6 . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA CHERRY HILLS DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 11+00 TO 13+43 6683.001 19 S-5 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 CHERRY HILLS DRIVE INSTALL 205 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING SEE SHEET S-2 N W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E CHERRY H I L L S D R I V E FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORM MAIN PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) EXISTING NATURAL GAS (TYP.) EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER (TYP.) 157° 90° 90° GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. MA T C H L I N E S T A 1 1 + 0 0 PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) 10' PUBLIC U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 343 S W V WV WV S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W 6W 6W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS S S S S S S SS SS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS WS WS SS SS SS WS SS SS SS WSWS SSSSSS 0 + 0 0 1 + 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+ 0 0 5+ 2 6 SD SD SD SD SD S D SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD S D S D SD SD SD SD SD SD B L O C K 7 L O T 1 1 0 1 7 1 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 2 8 1 5 8 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 3 8 1 9 2 s q . f t . BL O C K 7 L O T 4 8 0 1 3 s q . f t . B L O C K 7 L O T 5 82 9 2 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 L O T 2 9 1 6 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 1 9 6 2 6 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 3 8 0 8 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 L O T 4 82 4 9 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 5 9 2 1 9 s q . f t . B L O C K 8 L O T 6 10 1 5 5 s q . f t . EXISTING MANHOLE E-5 REMOVE/ADD RINGS OR BARREL TO ADJUST TO FG STA 0+05.64, 25.95' RT EXISTING MH E-5 IF PRESERVING - ADJUST FRAME HEIGHT USING RINGS AND/OR BARREL REPLACEMENT PER COL REQ. EXST. RIM = 3360.96 NEW RIM = 3361.94 MAX ALLOWABLE RINGS = 6" TOTAL PER COL MH-(12) STA 1+96.03, 8.25' RT MH-(13) STA 0+37.27, 8.25' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 1+20.45, 40.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 1+38.29, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 1+90.27, 39.98' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 2+19.33, 39.98' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 2+68.43, 40.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 3+06.86, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 4+02.28, 40.00' RT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 0+44.98, 40.00' LT INSTALL TRENCH PLUG SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-2 STA 0+59.10, 8.53' RT 10 1 7 1 s q . f t . BL O C K 7 LO T 1 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 3+20.14, 40.00' LT 4" SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE STUB STA. 4+08.70, 40.09' LT 91 6 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 2 96 2 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 1 80 8 6 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 3 82 4 9 s q . f t . BL O C K 8 LO T 4 MH-(2) STA 5+14.69, 8.25' RT 3350 3360 3370 3380 3350 3360 3370 3380 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 1 5 EG - 3 3 6 1 . 1 1 0+00 FG - 3 3 6 3 . 2 9 EG - 3 3 6 2 . 6 3 FG - 3 3 6 4 . 3 6 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 3 0 1+00 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 3 . 8 6 FG - 3 3 6 5 . 9 6 EG - 3 3 6 4 . 6 1 2+00 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 4 2 FG - 3 3 6 6 . 8 4 EG - 3 3 6 6 . 3 5 3+00 FG - 3 3 6 7 . 4 4 EG - 3 3 6 5 . 6 1 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 0 5 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 3 6 4+00 FG - 3 3 6 8 . 6 6 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 5 5 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 2 7 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 0 3 5+00 FG - 3 3 6 9 . 5 9 EG - 3 3 6 7 . 9 1 5+26 MH-(13) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 0+37.27 RIM ELEV=3362.22 8" INV IN (N) = 3356.47 8" INV OUT (SE) = 3356.27 DEPTH = 5.95' 36.24 LF 8" PVC @ 12.10% 157.87 LF 8" PVC @ 1.40% MH-(12) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 1+96.03 RIM ELEV=3365.76 8" INV IN (N) = 3358.82 8" INV OUT (S) = 3358.62 DEPTH = 7.14' 317.54 LF 8" PVC @ 0.41% MH-(2) INSTALL NEW 48" Ø MANHOLE STA 5+14.69 RIM ELEV=3369.55 8" INV IN (W) = 3360.29 8" INV IN (E) = 3360.29 8" INV OUT (S) = 3360.09 DEPTH = 9.46' STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 1+82.94 TOP = 3361.28 BOT = 3360.25 STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 0+52.32 TOP = 3359.50 BOT = 3357.97 EXST 48" Ø MANHOLE E-5 CONNECT TO EXST OR MODIFY AS NEEDED EXST 15" STUB TO NORTH SHALL BE CAPPED AND ABANDONED STA 0+05.64 EXST. RIM = 3360.96 NEW RIM = 3361.94 IF PRESERVING - ADJUST RIM USING MAX 6" TOTAL RINGS OR BARREL REPLACEMENT AS NECESSARY 8" INV IN (W) = 3352.36 8" INV IN (NW) = 3352.36 8" INV OUT (E) = 3352.30 DEPTH = 9.64' STORM DRAIN CROSSING STA 5+08.88 TOP = 3365.16 BOT = 3363.62 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ S E W E R - S - 5 A N D S - 6 . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA SOPHIA LANE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - STA. 0+00 TO 5+26 6683.001 20 S-6 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 0 VERT. SCALE IN FEET 0 HORIZ. SCALE IN FEET 24 4 8 1020 20 40 SOPHIA LANE INSTALL 512 LF 8" SDR 35 PVC SEWER PIPE TYPE A TRENCH BACKFILL TYPE 1 BEDDING FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AT ROAD CENTERLINE PROPOSED WATER MAIN SOPHIA LANE PROPOSED STORM MAIN CH E R R Y H I L L S D R I V E W . M A R Y L A N D L A N E SEE SHEET S-1 SEE SHEET S-3 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE (TYP.) 150° 168° 91° 96° GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE G-1 FOR SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES. PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING WATER MAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SEWER MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED STORM MAIN (TYP.) PROPOSED SEWER MAIN (TYP.) 10' PUBLIC UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 INSTALL 4" INSULATION SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET D-2 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE AND/OR REPLACE BASE AS NECESSARY EXISTING 15" MAIN STUBBED TO THE NORTH SHALL BE CAPPED AND ABANDONED. CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE IF MANHOLE IS MODIFIED OR REPLACED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONNECTION ELEVATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 344 FITTING SIZES 4" & 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 20" TEES & PLUGS 90° BEND 45° BEND & WYES REDUCERS & 22 1/2" BEND DIMENSIONS FOR THRUST BLOCKING A 2'-0" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-6" 5'-0" B 1'-11" 2'-6" 3'-3" 3'-10" 4'-0" 5'-0" A 2'-5" 3'-2" 4'-0" 4'-8" 5'-0" 7'-0" B 2'-2" 3'-0" 3'-10" 4'-8" 4'-8" 5'-0" A 1'-10" 2'-5" 3'-0" 3'-8" 4'-0" 4'-6" B 1'-7" 2'-1" 2'-9" 3'-3" 3'-0" 4'-0" A 1'-9" 1'-9" 2'-2" 2'-7" 3'-0" 3'-0" B 0'-10" 1'-6" 1'-11" 2'-3" 2'-6" 3'-0" TEE TEE (PLUGGED)BEND REDUCER B A 1 3 MIN. B 24"6'-10"5'-0"10'-0"5'-0"5'-8"4'-6"3'-8"3'-8" NOTES: 1.THIS TABLE IS BASED ON 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING PRESSURE AND 150 PSI MAIN PRESSURE. 2.WRAP ALL FITTINGS WITH POLYETHLENE PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE. 3.MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT ALONG WITH PIPE JOINT RESTRAINT MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ELECTING TO USE. A C 4" C B NOTES: 1.DIAGRAM DEPICTS GATE VALVES ONLY, VALVES 12 INCH AND LARGER TO BE BUTTERFLY, AND INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS WITH BLOCKS CENTERED UNDER LOAD BEARING PORTION OF VALVE. 2.STEEL CABLE (3/4" MINIMUM DIA. OR AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER) W/ANCHOR BOLTS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR ANCHOR ROD. 12 " - 2 4 " 5' MAX 4 TYPICAL MJ GATE VALVE SECTION DETAIL SCALE: NTS 6 TYPICAL BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY SCALE: NTS 3 VALVE THRUST BLOCKING DETAIL SCALE: NTS 2 THRUST BLOCK DETAIL SCALE: NTS MAIN 5 DRY UTILITY CONDUIT SECTION DETAIL SCALE: NTS NOTES:. 1.ONE CULVERT FOR ELECTRIC. 2.ONE CULVERT FOR COMMUNICATIONS. 3.ONE CULVERT FOR NATURAL GAS. 4.CONDUIT SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM 3' FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK. 5.CONDUIT SHALL BE A MINIMUM 4' AWAY FROM SIDEWALK RUNNING PARALLEL TO CONDUIT. 30" MIN. 40" MAX. 1.00'1.00' 4.00' UNDISTURBED EARTH (TYP.) CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK ANCHOR ROD (ASTM A615, GRADE 60 REBAR) OR APPROVED CABLES LOOPED ON BOTH ENDS ANCHOR ROD (ASTM A615, GRADE 60 REBAR) MUELLER SERIES A-2360 RESILIENT WEDGE MJ GATE VALVE, WITH STANDARD SQ. WRENCH NUT SEE PLAN FOR SIZE CAST IRON, 3 PIECE SCREW-TYPE VALVE BOX, OR APPROVED EQUAL MARKED WATER #14 COATED SOLID TRACE WIRE PLACED INSIDE SMALL DIAMETER PVC CONDUIT EXTENDED TO TOP AND INSIDE OF VALVE BOX DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE, MIN. 3" IN WIDTH, APWA COLORS CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK PER SCHEDULE CL 150 WATER MAIN, SEE PLAN FOR SIZE, SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C-900 OR AWWA C-905 FOR PIPE > 12" DIA SET VALVE BOX DEPTH IN ACCORDANCE TO MPWWS STANDARD DRAWING 5" ROAD BOX WITH 5" LID. SET AT FINISHED GRADE FINISH GROUND SURFACE END CAP WITH 2" OR LARGER OUTLET, AS SPECIFIED. RESTRAIN AS NECESSARY #14 SOLID COATED TRACE WIRE ALONG OUTSIDE OF CURB BOX. LEAVE 12" OF SLACK AND WRAP AROUND TOP OF BOX. CORPORATION STOP MUELLER H-15013 (2") CURB STOP MUELLER B-20283 (2") SECURE SERVICE TRACE WIRE TO MAIN TRACE WIRE. SECURE SERVICE TRACE WIRE TO CORP MUELLER H-10344 CURB BOX W/STATIONARY ROD AND ONE PIECE LID. SET PLUMB AND CENTER OVER OPERATING NUT. SDR-9 PE PIPE 12" TYPICAL N-12 DOUBLE WALL CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE CULVERTS WITH END CAPS AND BAND (TYP.) FINISHED GRADE FINAL ASPHALT ASPHALT SECTION PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SPECIFIED GRAVEL SECTION OR COMPACTED SOIL REQUIREMENTS PER THE SPECIFIED TYPICAL SECTION FOR EACH ROADWAY. SEE SHEET D-3. NOTES: 1.PRESSURES SHOWN ABOVE ARE MAXIMUM WORKING PRESSURE IN SYSTEM. 2.WRAP ALL APPURTENANCES WITH POLYETHLENE PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE. 3.MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT ALONG WITH PIPE JOINT RESTRAINT MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ELECTING TO USE. 1 JOINT RESTRAINT TABLE - MINIMUM RESTRAINT LENGTHS SCALE: NTS VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ D E T A I I L S . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA WATER AND UTILITY DETAILS (1 OF 2) 6683.001 21 D-1 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 A A B A A HORIZONTAL RESTRAINT LENGTH LOCATION FIGURE NOTES 1.RESTRAINT LENGTHS ASSUME A 6.5' BURY DEPTH IN LEAN CLAY (LC) SOILS WITH 200 PSI TEST PRESSURE. ASSUME MEGALUG OR EQUIVALENT FITTINGS AND ALL RESTRAINTS REQUIRED. ALL JOINTS WITHIN THE RESTRAINT LENGTH MUST BE RESTRAINED. IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN FITTINGS IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE CALCULATED RESTRAINT LENGTH, RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SAID FITTINGS. 2.IF JOINT RESTRAINT IS NOT FEASIBLE INSTALL THRUST BLOCKS PER MPWSS. 3.INSTALL PER CURRENT EDITIONS OF CITY OF LAUREL (COL) STANDARDS AND MONTANA PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (MPWSS). 4.ALL HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE FULLY RESTRAINED. TEE BEND A A B VERTICAL RESTRAINT LENGTH LOCATION FIGURE TEE BEND B DUCTILE IRON RESTRAINT LENGTHS FOR JOINT RESTRAINT (IN FEET) DESCRIPTION A B 8" TEE - STANDARD 8.00 4.00 8" X 6" TEE (SEE NOTE 4 BELOW FOR HYDRANT LEADS)4.00 9.00 12" X 8" TEE 5.00 7.00 12" X 6" TEE (SEE NOTE 4 BELOW FOR HYDRANT LEADS)3.00 5.00 8" HORIZONTAL 90° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)20.00 -- 8" HORIZONTAL 45° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)8.00 -- 8" HORIZONTAL 22.5° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)4.00 -- 8" HORIZONTAL 11.25° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)2.00 -- 8" VERTICAL OFFSET 22.5° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)16.00 4.00 8" VERTICAL 11.25° BEND (EACH SIDE OF BEND)8.00 2.00 8" DEAD END (CAPS)57.00 8" GATE VALVE 57.00 345 1 4 3 4. 0 ' SEE DETAIL BELOW 10' 6 1 / 2 ' M I N . CO V E R SELECT MATERIAL BACKFILL AREA (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) DETAIL OF A PROPERLY INSTALLED CORPORATION STOP. GENERAL NOTES: 1.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 6 1/2 FOOT COVER MEASURED FROM THE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR AS SPECIFIED. 3.BEDDING SHALL BE 1" DIA. MAXIMUM WITHIN 6" OF SERVICE PIPE. PUE NOTES: 1. INSTALL INSULATION OVER ALL WATER OR SEWER LINES WITH LESS THAN 6.5' OR 4.0' COVER, RESPECTIVELY, TO FINISHED GRADE OR CULVERT. 2. INSTALL INSULATION IN TWO 2"-THICK LAYERS. ROTATE ORIENTATION OR STAGGER JOINTS TO PROVIDE 2' MIN. OVERLAP BETWEEN JOINTS. 3. INSULATION BOARD SHALL BE 2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BOARD PER AASHTO M230-70. 6" MIN. - 12" MAX. GRANULAR BEDDING 8" 4' GROUND SURFACE TR E N C H W A L L CULVERT CROSSINGS: 18" MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN CULVERT & WATER/SEWER LINES 2' CO V E R ( T Y P ) TRENCH BOTTOM CULVERT INSULATION TABLE FOR WATER/SEWER LINE (SIZES 2" TO 12") VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER/SEWER AND WIDTH OF INSULATION FINISHED GRADE/CULVERT TO BE INSTALLED 2.5'-4.5' 8.0' 4.5'-6.5' 4.0' 5' MAX. 6" 18" MIN. EXISTING STREET SURFACE 4" NOTE: WHERE TRENCH PASSES THROUGH EXISTING PAVEMENT THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE CUT ALONG A NEAT VERTICAL LINE A MINIMUM OF 12" FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRENCH OPENING. WHERE NEAT LINE IS LESS THAN 3' FROM EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT OR CURB AND GUTTER SECTION, REMOVE AND REPLACE ENTIRE PAVEMENT SECTION BETWEEN TRENCH AND EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SUBGRADE OR GROUND SURFACE VERTICAL TRENCH WALLS WITH SHORING TO CONFORM TO O.S.H.A. REGULATIONS* 12" MIN. INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE 18" MAX. DEPTH. (OPTIONAL) TRENCH WIDTH = O.D. OF PIPE PLUS 2' MIN. TRENCH WIDTH 3.5' SELECT BEDDING MATERIAL PLACED IN 6" LAYERS & COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY AS PER AASHTO T-99 IMPORTED 3 4" MINUS SELECT BEDDING MATERIAL PLACED IN 6" MAX. LAYERS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TYPE 2 PIPE BEDDING WHERE REQUIRED FOR SOFT OR UNSTABLE FOUNDATION TYPE "A" TRENCH BACKFILL BACKSLOPE AS SPECIFIED TO CONFORM TO O.S.H.A. REGULATIONS* TYPE 1 PIPE BEDDING EXCAVATED MATERIAL NOTES: TRACER WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LAUREL REQUIREMENTS. CITY OF LAUREL PERSONNEL SHALL CERTIFY INSTALLATION OF TRACER WIRE PRIOR TO PAVING. WHEN IN UNSTABLE OR SOFT MATERIAL, TRENCH WALLS SHALL BE BACKSLOPED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. * SEE O.S.H.A. SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS. SECTION A GROUND SURFACE GROUND SURFACE3' 10' A STEEL POST MARKER PAINTED BLUE CURB BOX WITH STATIONARY ROD (MUELLER MODEL H-10334, OR APPROVED EQUAL) CURB STOP (MUELLER MODEL H-15209N, OR APPROVED EQUAL) BASE MATERIAL PROPERTY LINE GROUND SURFACE ROAD SURFACE TAP BY CONTRACTOR TRENCH BOTTOM 3/4" DIA. MIN. CTS POLYETHYLENE PRESSURE PIPE SERVICE SADDLE (POWERSEAL 3490AS OR MUELLER EQUIVALENT) CORPORATION STOP (MUELLER H15006 OR H15026, OR APPROVED EQUAL) INSTALL 12 AWG TRACER WIRE SECURE EVERY 5' TO MAIN TRENCH WALL STD. TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WALL PLUG LIMIT PLUG LIMIT TRENCH BOTTOMPLUG LIMIT TYPE 1 BEDDING SELECT PIPE BEDDING STD. TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH PLUG MATERIAL BOTTOM OF TRENCH 3' 3'3' 3' ALT."B" INSTALLATION (TOP & BOTH SIDES): 4" THICK INSULATION BOARD - 8' MIN.LENGTH ALONG WATER/SEWER LINES BACKFILL 2" THICK SAND CUSHION ALT."A" INSTALLATION (TOP ONLY): 4" THICK x 8' WIDE INSULATION BOARD - 8' MIN. LENGTH ALONG WATER/SEWER LINES WATER/SEWER LINE PER PLAN PER PLAN 3'-0" 3'-0" PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1.BASE COURSE AND SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D 698. 2.CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS M-4000 REINFORCED WITH 1.5 LBS OF FIBERMESH PER CUBIC YARD OR WITH 6X6X10 GAUGE WIRE MESH. 3.ALL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MINIMUM ROAD SECTIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED THROUGHOUT VALLEY GUTTER. FLOWLINE TOP-BACK OF CURB FACE OF CURB EDGE OF ASPHALT A JOINTS ARE REQUIRED AT INTERVALS OF 1-1/2 TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE GUTTER (MAX) DOUBLE GUTTER FLOWLINE (TYP) TBC RADIUS PER PLAN TBC RADIUS PER PLAN EDGE OF ASPHALT A SLOPE GUTTER AT 1/2" PER FOOT 6" (MIN) 71 2" (MIN) 6'-0"FINISHED ASPHALT SURFACE TO BE 1/8" TO 1/4" ABOVE GUTTER LIP 15' MINIMUM TRANSITION LENGTH 6" (MIN) DEPTH OF COMPACTED CRUSHED BASE COURSE BELOW DOUBLE GUTTER SECTION A-A #4 BARS @12" O.C. (TYP) 10.0' PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE GROUND SURFACE GREEN STEEL POST AT END OF SERVICE 2' COMPACTED BACKFILL DRIVING SURFACE 2" X 2" WOOD MARKER PLUG SERVICE INVERT NO LOWER THAN SPRING LINE OF SEWER MAIN FOR WYE FITTINGS. SEWER MAIN 45° ELBOW 4-INCH SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE IN LINE WYE FITTING FOR NEW INSTALLATIONS SERVICE LINE. SLOPE = 1/4" PER FOOT MIN., 1/2" PER FOOT MAX.10.0' PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE GROUND SURFACE GREEN STEEL POST AT END OF SERVICE 2' COMPACTED BACKFILL 2" X 2" WOOD MARKER PLUG 4.0'2.0' SERVICE INVERT NO LOWER THAN SPRING LINE OF SEWER MAIN FOR WYE FITTINGS. 45° ELBOW IN LINE WYE FITTING FOR NEW INSTALLATIONS SEWER MAIN 45° ELBOW 4-INCH SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE SERVICE LINE. SLOPE = 1/4" PER FOOT MIN., 1/2" PER FOOT MAX. DRIVING SURFACE VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ D E T A I I L S . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA WATER AND UTILITY DETAILS (2 OF 2) 6683.001 22 D-2 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PR E L I M I N A R Y D R A F T - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N JU N E 2 0 2 5 1 - STANDARD WATER CROSS SECTION SCALE: NTS 2 - TYPICAL WATER SERVICE SCALE: NTS 3 - INSULATION DETAIL SCALE: NTS 4 - TYPICAL TRENCH PLUG SCALE: NTS 5 - STANDARD VALLEY GUTTER DETAIL SCALE: NTS 6 - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE SCALE: NTS 7 - DEEP SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE SCALE: NTS 346 VERIFY SCALE! THESE PRINTS MAY BE REDUCED. LINE BELOW MEASURES ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! 2025COPYRIGHT © MORRISON-MAIERLE, SHEET NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BY N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ S H E E T S \ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ D E T A I I L S . D W G REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: Q.C. REVIEW DATE: BY: 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle PLOTTED BY:HAAKEN SYVRUD ON Jun/30/2025 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LAUREL MONTANA STANDARD ROAD CROSS SECTIONS 6683.001 23 D-3 BLK KCK MEG 06/2025 PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JUNE 2025 EXISTING SUBGRADE MATERIAL SCARIFY 8" AND RECOMPACT TO 95% MDD USING STANDARD PROCTOR 12" OF PITRUN SUB-BASE COURSE 6" OF 1-12 INCH MINUS BASE COURSE 4" HOT MIX ASPHALT - INSTALL IN TWO LIFTS 2.0%2.0%SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL)SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL) 2 - TYPICAL 49' TBC-TBC ROAD CROSS SECTION (W. MARYLAND LANE) SCALE: NTS OPTIONAL GEOGRID MATERIAL INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS (NOT REQUIRED PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT) 49.00' TBC-TBC9.50' BLVD5.00' FUTURE SDWK 9.50' BLVD 5.00' FUTURE SDWK 80.00' ROW SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL) SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL) 1.0' MIN.1.0' MIN. 1.0' MIN.1.0' MIN. 37.00' TBC-TBC 5.50' BLVD 5.00' FUTURE SDWK 60.00' ROW 5.50' BLVD5.00' FUTURE SDWK EXISTING SUBGRADE MATERIAL SCARIFY 8" AND RECOMPACT TO 95% MDD USING STANDARD PROCTOR 12" OF PITRUN SUB-BASE COURSE 6" OF 1-12 INCH MINUS BASE COURSE 3" HOT MIX ASPHALT 2.0%2.0% OPTIONAL GEOGRID MATERIAL INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS (NOT REQUIRED PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT) 1 - TYPICAL 37' TBC-TBC LOCAL ROAD CROSS SECTION (SOPHIA LN AND CHERRY HILLS DR) SCALE: NTS SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL) SLOPE VARIES (1.5% TYPICAL) 1.0' MIN.1.0' MIN. 347 SECTION 12 CONCEPTUAL LOT LAYOUT 348 S 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S S S S S S S S S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8 W 8 W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S 8S 8S 8 S 8 S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS S S SS SS W SWS WS WS WS SS SS WS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS O O [][][][][][][][][][] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYH S S S S S S SS S S SS SS S WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV T TT WV WV W 6 S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D 4S D SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD BLOCK 10 LOT 8 10304 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 17 BLOCK 10 LOT 16 BLOCK 10 LOT 15 BLOCK 10 LOT 14 BLOCK 10 LOT 13 BLOCK 10 LOT 12 BLOCK 10 LOT 11 BLOCK 10 LOT 10 BLOCK 10 LOT 9 BLOCK 10 LOT 8 BLOCK 10 LOT 7 BLOCK 10 LOT 3 BLOCK 10 LOT 17 10048 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 16 12442 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 15 7661 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 14 7577 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 13 7560 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 12 7532 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 11 7554 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 10 7639 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 9 8592 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 7 12926 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 3 9081 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 5 BLOCK 9 LOT 4 BLOCK 9 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 4 9774 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 3 7919 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 2 BLOCK 6 LOT 3 BLOCK 6 LOT 4 BLOCK 6 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 LOT 6 BLOCK 6 LOT 7 BLOCK 6 LOT 8 BLOCK 7 LOT 2 BLOCK 7 LOT 3 BLOCK 7 LOT 4 BLOCK 7 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 LOT 2 9892 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 3 10385 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 4 9353 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 5 7572 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 6 7579 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 7 7654 sq.ft. BLOCK 6 LOT 8 7613 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 1 10171 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 2 8158 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 3 8192 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 4 8013 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 5 8292 sq.ft. O.S. 03OPEN SPACE 03 18958 sq.ft. BLOCK 7 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 13519 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 18 11584 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 18 BLOCK 8 LOT 2 BLOCK 8 LOT 1 BLOCK 8 LOT 3 BLOCK 9 LOT 2 BLOCK 9 LOT 1 BLOCK 9 LOT 10 BLOCK 9 LOT 9 BLOCK 9 LOT 8 BLOCK 9 LOT 7 BLOCK 9 LOT 6 BLOCK 9 LOT 5 8695 sq.ft.BLOCK 8 LOT 2 9166 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 1 9626 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 3 8086 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 2 8086 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 1 9153 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 10 9225 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 9 9371 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 8 11592 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 7 9974 sq.ft. BLOCK 9 LOT 6 9856 sq.ft.O.S. 02OPEN SPACE 02 104589 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 BLOCK 8 LOT 5 BLOCK 8 LOT 4 BLOCK 8 LOT 4 8249 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 5 9219 sq.ft. BLOCK 8 LOT 7 11911 sq.ft. O.S. 01 BLOCK 10 LOT 6 BLOCK 10 LOT 5 BLOCK 10 LOT 4 BLOCK 10 LOT 2 BLOCK 10 LOT 1 BLOCK 10 LOT 6 11884 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 5 10284 sq.ft.BLOCK 10 LOT 4 9238 sq.ft. BLOCK 10 LOT 2 8465 sq.ft.BLOCK 10 LOT 1 7834 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE 01 26162 sq.ft. N89°30'10"W 312.97' C1 C2 C3 S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 0 7 . 4 3 ' S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 2 2 . 2 5 ' N89°29'17"W 85.00' C4 S0 ° 3 0 ' 4 3 " W 1 1 9 . 4 0 ' N89°30'26"W 85.00' C5 C6 L 1 L 2 S 2 6 ° 5 9 ' 1 9 " E 6 2 . 5 4 ' L 3 N89°30'06"W 108.41' C7 C8 L4 L 5 S 1 9 ° 2 0 ' 2 8 " E 5 7 . 3 3 ' N89°30'02"W 171.78' C9 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 4 . 5 7 ' N89°30'02"W 49.28' S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 6 . 2 5 ' N89°30'02"W 72.00' C10 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 0 9 . 6 5 ' N89°30'02"W 71.00' C11 C12 S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 1 1 4 . 5 2 ' N89°30'02"W 68.00' N88°47'34"E 110.00' S1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " E 91 . 0 4 ' C13 N1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " W 93 . 1 8 ' L30 L 2 9 S88°48'36"E 129.27' S1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " E 75 . 4 9 ' C17 L 2 8 L2 7 S88°48'36"E 127.17' C1 8 L8 L7 C1 4 N89°38'12"E 107.18' S0 ° 2 1 ' 4 8 " E 64 . 7 2 ' L6 L2 6 L2 5 S89°30'23"E 111.26' L1 1 C1 9 C1 5 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 57 . 2 6 ' S85°30'51"E 94.40' L1 0 L9 L1 4 L2 4 L23 S78°25' 0 6 " E 9 4 . 6 9 ' N1 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 6 " E 66 . 3 4 ' S77°05 ' 0 1 " E 1 0 3 . 9 0 ' L53 L22 L1 2 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 95 . 4 3 ' S78°25' 0 6 " E 8 6 . 9 8 ' L1 3 N1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " E 96 . 1 1 ' C16 S79°53'2 7 " E 37.11' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 96 . 0 0 ' N1 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 6 " E 10 1 . 9 0 ' C20 S73°1 3 ' 5 0 " E 81.36 ' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 95 . 5 6 ' L2 1 L20 L1 9 L 1 8 L 1 7 L16 L1 5 C21 S58° 1 9 ' 0 5 " W 53.6 2 ' N 2 1 ° 5 8 ' 1 4 " W 1 3 6 . 4 1 ' C34 S7 ° 3 2 ' 0 1 " E 1 3 2 . 6 1 ' S58° 1 9 ' 0 5 " W 53.6 2 ' N 3 5 ° 4 2 ' 2 1 " W 1 3 1 . 4 8 ' C33 S41 ° 3 2 ' 2 5 " W 66. 7 2 ' N 5 3 ° 3 6 ' 3 1 " W 1 3 2 . 4 3 ' C32 S34 ° 0 0 ' 1 2 " W 73. 3 7 ' N 5 5 ° 2 1 ' 5 1 " W 1 3 1 . 5 6 ' N32 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 49. 1 4 ' C31 S34 ° 0 0 ' 1 2 " W 73. 3 7 ' N 5 7 ° 0 8 ' 2 6 " W 1 2 9 . 9 1 ' N32 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 77. 4 4 ' S71°34 ' 0 1 " W 8 3 . 9 6 ' S85°47'10"W 79.41' C3 0 N32 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " E 52. 6 4 ' S 1 6 ° 4 8 ' 5 1 " E 9 9 . 9 4 ' C28N 1 9 ° 0 6 ' 5 2 " W 6 3 . 2 3 ' C 2 9 S 9 ° 2 4 ' 3 1 " E 1 0 8 . 0 2 ' C27 N89°53'00"E 86.51' S0 ° 3 7 ' 0 1 " E 1 0 0 . 9 7 ' C26 S2 3 ° 5 3 ' 0 5 " W 46 . 2 3 ' C24C25 N89°53'00"E 88.29' S6 ° 1 0 ' 2 8 " E 6 4 . 0 1 ' C36 N6 ° 0 1 ' 4 7 " E 1 0 9 . 2 3 ' S87°09'51"E 88.18' S 1 9 ° 0 6 ' 5 2 " E 7 4 . 0 0 ' C35N89°30'02"W 84.30' N2 2 ° 0 0 ' 0 4 " E 12 2 . 5 5 ' S87°09'51"E 85.90' N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 64 . 5 1 ' S70° 2 7 ' 2 0 " E 1 2 2 . 9 0 ' C3 7 L 3 1 L3 2 S6 1 ° 5 3 ' 2 2 " E 1 0 1 . 4 2 ' C3 8 N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 78 . 0 0 ' S6 1 ° 5 3 ' 2 2 " E 1 0 1 . 4 6 ' L33 C3 9 N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 76 . 0 0 ' N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 76 . 7 7 ' S5 7 ° 1 3 ' 5 3 " E 1 0 7 . 3 6 ' S32 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " W 68 . 2 8 ' L35 S5 7 ° 1 3 ' 5 3 " E 1 1 0 . 9 4 ' S32 ° 4 6 ' 0 7 " W 68. 5 0 ' L3 4 S 5 3 ° 0 8 ' 2 3 " E 1 0 8 . 4 4 ' C40 L54 L36 S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 1 4 . 2 7 ' C41 N36 ° 5 1 ' 3 7 " E 65. 1 7 ' N40 ° 4 2 ' 2 7 " E 72. 0 0 ' S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 2 6 . 2 0 ' C42 S 4 9 ° 1 7 ' 3 3 " E 1 5 0 . 7 5 ' C43 N40 ° 4 2 ' 2 7 " E 75. 0 0 ' L4 4 C44 L37 L38 L 3 9 L4 0 L41 S 3 9 ° 1 0 ' 3 0 " E 7 6 . 3 4 ' L4 3 L 4 8 C45 L42 N75°50'4 6 " E 119.56' S83°57'05"E 77.56' L 4 5 L4 6 L 4 7 C46 S83°52'46"E 75.59' L49 S1 ° 2 2 ' 5 3 " W 1 3 3 . 7 7 ' C47 S73° 1 4 ' 3 5 " E 91.11' S7 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 1 1 8 . 3 0 ' C48 S73° 1 4 ' 3 5 " E 83.95' S1 1 ° 1 4 ' 4 8 " W 1 1 5 . 4 5 ' S73°1 9 ' 0 1 " E 81.50 ' S1 3 ° 4 4 ' 2 8 " W 1 1 5 . 1 9 ' N73° 1 3 ' 5 0 " W 76.47' C49 L52 S73° 1 1 ' 1 6 " E 72.94' S1 2 ° 2 9 ' 4 3 " W 1 1 2 . 1 2 ' L50 S7 ° 3 7 ' 4 5 " W 1 0 9 . 3 8 ' N79°53'27 " W 76.31' L51 C22 C23 N73° 1 3 ' 5 0 " W 32.74' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 89 . 8 7 ' BLOCK 8 LOT 6 BLOCK 8 LOT 6 10155 sq.ft. L55 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8 S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W S S S S S S S S S S S FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by haaken syvrud on Jun/25/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ L O T L A Y O U T . d w g 6683.001  1/2 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - FOURTH FILING LAUREL MONTANA LOT LAYOUT HPS KCK MEG 06/2025 60 12030600 SCALE IN FEET TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 3034, SITUATED IN THE N1/2 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 24 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA. CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING CHERRY HILLS DR. (PROPOSED 60' ROW) PROPOSED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LOT LAYOUT W. MARYLAND LN. CHERRY H I L L S D R . BIG D I T C H IR R I G A T I O N L A T E R A L BIG D I T C H IRRI G A T I O N L A T E R A L DA V I S C I R C L E D U V A L D R I V E EL S D R I V E NW. MARYLAND LN. CHERR Y   H I L L S SUBDIV I S I O N 3RD FILI N G ELEN A SUBD I V I S I O N 2ND F I L I N G COS 1262 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) ALL ROW FRONTAGE W. MARYLAND LN. (PROPOSED 80' ROW) NW. MARYLAND LN. (PROPOSED 80' ROW) SOPHIA RD. (PROPOSED 60' ROW) EXST 12" WATER MAIN EXST 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXST DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP) EXST WIRE FENCE (TYP) EXST ABANDONED DRAINAGE DITCH EXST BURIED POWER EXST OVERHEAD POWER EXST GAS LINE EXST STORMWATER RETENTION POND, 47,135 CF STORAGE VOLUME, (16,291 CF FOR 3RD FILING, 30,575 CF FOR 4TH FILING) PROPOSED WATER MAIN (TYP) PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN (TYP) PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MAIN (TYP) EXST 30" STORM DRAIN MAIN (TYP) EXST STORMWATER DISCHARGE PIPING EXST STORMWATER WET WELL PUMP STATION PROPOSED SIDEWALK (TYP) PROPOSED 18" CULVERT PROPOSED 18" CULVERT EXST STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO BIG DITCH LATERAL EXST CULVERT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED FUTURE BRIDGE WETLAND 349 PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 LENGTH 209.22 15.41 109.52 86.44 70.94 14.24 40.18 193.00 96.91 72.02 71.09 68.18 110.03 52.96 29.63 49.92 143.74 29.50 66.48 20.32 77.65 161.93 170.88 14.14 61.44 70.24 70.22 RADIUS 444.83 440.00 410.01 410.01 410.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2940.00 2860.00 370.00 369.99 530.00 2860.00 430.00 429.49 440.00 440.00 440.00 2860.00 2860.05 490.00 490.00 502.73 DELTA 026°56'55" 002°00'25" 015°18'19" 012°04'48" 009°54'48" 000°16'39" 000°46'59" 003°45'41" 001°53'19" 001°24'13" 001°23'07" 001°19'44" 002°12'15" 008°12'04" 004°35'17" 005°23'47" 002°52'46" 003°55'51" 008°52'07" 002°38'44" 010°06'39" 021°05'08" 003°25'24" 000°17'00" 007°11'03" 008°12'48" 008°00'11" PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42 C43 C44 C45 C46 C47 C48 C49 LENGTH 87.30 63.92 62.86 28.31 107.97 86.06 86.06 35.99 129.15 52.32 63.25 49.63 49.58 65.33 73.05 79.00 106.79 80.27 72.69 75.55 32.01 54.62 RADIUS 498.16 140.00 140.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 360.00 360.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 595.50 621.43 273.77 710.48 DELTA 010°02'28" 026°09'32" 025°43'27" 003°41'13" 014°03'33" 011°12'23" 011°12'23" 005°43'40" 020°33'17" 014°59'21" 018°07'10" 014°13'07" 005°40'54" 007°29'10" 008°22'14" 009°03'09" 012°14'12" 009°11'54" 006°59'38" 006°57'56" 006°41'57" 004°24'16" PARCEL LINE DATA SEGMENT L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 LENGTH 11.34 22.90 39.34 15.70 44.72 8.96 22.47 39.54 33.60 43.80 3.00 54.21 29.97 65.70 25.75 32.91 32.53 41.21 31.37 42.33 26.04 20.28 50.58 41.07 10.85 60.73 35.66 36.15 DIRECTION S40° 17' 26"E S48° 00' 24"E S21° 51' 17"E S2° 21' 36"E S37° 01' 54"E S1° 12' 26"E N1° 12' 26"W S1° 12' 26"E S0° 21' 48"E S4° 29' 09"W S11° 31' 25"W S4° 29' 09"W S11° 34' 54"W S11° 34' 54"W N9° 54' 48"E N49° 04' 33"E N7° 20' 41"W N26° 08' 05"W N27° 21' 45"E N65° 53' 27"W N55° 21' 17"W N55° 21' 17"W N35° 00' 09"E N3° 44' 01"E N22° 31' 52"E N19° 49' 45"E N17° 34' 30"E N14° 36' 08"W PARCEL LINE DATA SEGMENT L29 L30 L31 L32 L33 L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L39 L40 L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 L46 L47 L48 L49 L50 L51 L52 L53 L54 L55 LENGTH 45.86 38.83 15.17 45.18 26.63 55.56 13.15 73.24 24.38 25.26 14.35 19.40 49.78 65.68 31.20 35.63 32.28 51.36 32.65 32.17 14.74 31.83 35.35 20.70 19.65 15.81 7.51 DIRECTION N14° 36' 08"W N38° 56' 24"E S16° 43' 37"E N21° 56' 21"E S32° 46' 07"W N28° 06' 38"E N36° 51' 37"E N36° 51' 37"E N40° 42' 27"E N50° 28' 13"E S35° 03' 13"E S60° 18' 49"E N70° 01' 52"E N50° 32' 30"E S58° 35' 00"E S63° 50' 14"E S5° 44' 39"E S9° 11' 12"W S20° 49' 00"E S13° 10' 38"E S83° 58' 40"E S82° 23' 29"E S73° 11' 16"E N73° 13' 50"W N35° 00' 09"E S32° 46' 07"W N40° 42' 27"E FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by haaken syvrud on Jun/24/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N: \ 6 6 8 3 \ 0 0 1 \ A C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ 6 6 8 3 . 0 0 1 _ C H E R R Y H I L L S 4 T H F I L I N G _ L O T L A Y O U T . d w g 6683.001  2/2 CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - FOURTH FILING LAUREL MONTANA LOT LAYOUT HPS KCK MEG 06/2025 60 12030600 SCALE IN FEET TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 3034, SITUATED IN THE N1/2 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 24 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA. CHERRY HILL SUBDIVISION - 4TH FILING LOT LAYOUT STORMWATER DETAIL NOTES 1.STORM SEWER MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH UTILIZING TYPE 1 TRENCH BACKFILL PER MPWSS DETAIL 02221-1. 2.WATER MAIN AND STORM SEWER MAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL EDGE TO EDGE SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. WHERE SEWER MAIN AND WATER MAINS CROSS A MINIMUM 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. SEE MPWSS DETAIL 02660-2. 3.STORM SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MPWSS DETAIL 02720-3. 4.MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE ROTATED TOWARD CENTERLINE OF ROAD. 5.INLETS SHALL BE EJIW 7030Z1 FRAME & 7030MG GRATE (OR APPROVED EQUAL). 6.ALL STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES SHALL INCLUDE A 1.5-FT SUMP. 7.MANHOLE FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE PER MPWSS DETAIL 02213-1. 350 SECTION 13 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 351 EXISTING 80' EASEMENT DOC# 3358070 S82°23'29"E 31.83' N89°30'02"W 1154.44' S10°06'33"W 60.00'S7 ° 3 7 ' 4 5 " W 10 9 . 3 8 ' N79°53'27"W 39.20' S4 ° 2 9 ' 0 9 " W 98 . 0 1 ' S0 ° 2 1 ' 4 8 " E 98 . 3 2 ' S1 ° 1 2 ' 2 6 " E 10 0 . 0 0 ' S 3 ° 0 7 ' 1 9 " E 8 0 . 0 1 ' R=2940.00' L=43.32' Δ=0°50'39" CB=N86°09'47"E CH=43.32'S0 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " W 11 4 . 5 2 ' S1 1 ° 3 4 ' 5 4 " W 12 5 . 9 7 ' N2 1 ° 5 9 ' 0 4 " E 25 3 . 7 0 ' N2 8 ° 0 6 ' 3 8 " E 35 0 . 8 4 ' N40 ° 4 2 ' 2 7 " E 178 . 8 9 ' N50 ° 3 1 ' 4 5 " E 90.6 8 ' N75°47'2 9 " E 119.32' S83°58'40"E 168.33' S73° 1 4 ' 3 5 " E 364. 8 5 ' N36 ° 5 1 ' 3 7 " E 151 . 5 6 ' LOT 3 0.23 acs. LOT 1 0.23 acs.LOT 2 0.24 acs. LOT 5 0.23 acs. LOT 4 0.23 acs.LOT 6 0.23 acs. LOT 2 0.21 acs. LOT 3 0.21 acs. LOT 4 0.21 acs. LOT 1 0.25 acs. LOT 7 0.22 acs. LOT 1 0.20 acs. LOT 4 0.19 acs. LOT 6 0.18 acs. LOT 3 0.21 acs. LOT 8 0.20 acs. LOT 2 0.23 acs. LOT 9 0.21 acs. LOT 4 0.22 acs. LOT 5 0.21 acs. LOT 3 0.32 acs. 0.55 acs. LOT 2 0.21 acs. LOT 3 0.20 acs. LOT 1 0.22 acs. LOT 1 0.19 acs. LOT 2 0.22 acs. LOT 5 0.18 acs. N89°30'02"W 1325.80'N89°28'37"W 344.64'N89°28'37"W 344.64' EXISTING 80' EASEMENT DOC# 3358070 ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2023 PLOTTED DATE: Dec/03/2023 PLOTTED BY: kyle thompson DRAWING NAME: N:\6683\001\ACAD\Survey\6683.001_COS 3034 Retracement Plat.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF COUNTY,DATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:11WESTERN HOLDINGS, LLC YELLOWSTONE 6683.001 1"=80' 08/2023 KIT NJM MMI 24 EAST 2 SOUTH 8NE, NW MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA AMENDED TRACT 1, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 3034 BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 3034. LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 24 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LAUREL, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net 80 16040800 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND PLSS CORNER POSITION ESTABLISHED FROM FOUND MONUMENTS AND PRIOR PLATS OF RECORD Found Rebar, 5/8 in. diam. Found Yellow Plastic Cap 35 36 12 CENTER ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 8, AS SHOWN IN COS 1262. BASIS OF BEARINGS Billings Coordinate System, NAD83(2011) per the "Rocky Mountain Tribal Coordinate Reference System" Handbook and User Guide, Published September 30th, 2014 and subsequent revisions, established by observations with survey-grade GNSS receivers. COS 12 6 2 COS 21 7 1 PARCE L 1 C T R 1 C 2ND AM N D BIG D I T C H BIG DITCH CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY This document has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office and is acceptable as to form. Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2023. ________________________________________ County Attorney ELENA S U B D I V I S I O N 2nd FIL I N G CHERR Y HILLS S U B 2nd FIL I N G AMEND E D P L A T C H E R R Y H I L L SUBDIV I S I O N 3 r d F I L I N G POINT OF BEGINNING TRACT 1A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR I, the undersigned, Kyle I. Thompson, Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that this Certificate of Survey was surveyed under my direct supervision and platted the same as shown on the accompanying Certificate of Survey and platted in accordance with the provisions of the Montana Subdivision and Platting ACT, Section 76-3-101 through 76-3-365 MCA and the Yellowstone County Subdivision Regulations. DATED this _____ day of ____________________, 2023. Kyle I. Thompson Montana Registration No. 13108LS LEGAL DESCRIPTION The described tract of land is the retracement of a portion of; “Tract 1 of Certificate Of Survey No. 3034”, City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana.OWNER Western Holdings, LLC, P.O. Box 51330, Billings, MT 59105 PURPOSE To retrace the boundary of Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 3034, and the Amended Plat of Cherry Hill Subdivision 3rd Filing.The described Tract of land is to be known and designated as “Tract 1A of Certificate Of Survey No. 3034-A”, City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. Tract 1A, Being a portion of Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 3034, Situated in the Northeast One Quarter of the Northwest One Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East, Principal Meridian, Yellowstone County, Montana. The subject property is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 3034, also being a point on the Northwest corner of Certificate of Survey No.1262 and, the True Point of Beginning; thence along the exterior boundary line of said Certificate of Survey No. 3034; thence N21°59'04"E a distance of 253.70 feet; thence N28°06'38"E a distance of 350.84 feet; thence N36°51'37"E a distance of 151.56 feet; thence N40°42'27"E a distance of 178.89 feet; thence N50°31'45"E a distance of 90.68 feet; thence N75°47'29"E for a distance of 119.32 feet; thence S83°58'40"E a distance of 168.33 feet; thence S73°14'35"E a distance of 364.85 feet; thence S82°23'29"E a distance of 31.83 feet to a point being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 5 of Amended Plat Cherry Hill Subdivision 3rd Filing; thence along the west boundary of Lot 1 Block 5 of said Amended Plat S07°37'45"W a distance of 109.38 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 1 and the north right-of-way of Cherry Hills Dr; thence S10°06'33"W a distance of 60.00 feet to a point on the south right-of-way of said Cherry Hills Dr and on the north line of Lot 1 Block 4; thence N79°53'27"W a distance of 39.20 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence along the west line of said Lot 1 S11°34'54"W a distance of 125.97 feet to a corner common to Lots 1 and Lot 2 Block 4; thence along the west line of said Lot 2 S4°29'09"W a distance of 98.01 feet to a point common to Lots 2 and 3 block 4; thence S0°21'48"E along the west line of Lot 3 a distance of 98.32 feet to a point common to Lots 3 and 4; thence S1°12'26"E along the west line of said lot 4 a distance of 100.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 4 also being a point on the north right-of-way of West Maryland Ln; thence S3°07'19"E a distance of 80.01 feet to a point on the south right-of-way of West Maryland Ln; thence east along a non-tangent curve to the left with a radius of 2940.00 feet with a central angle of 0°50'39" an arc length of 43.32 feet and having a chord bearing of N86°09'47"E and a chord distance of 43.32 feet being a point on the south right-of-way of said West Maryland Ln and the northwest corner of Lot 1 Block 1; thence along the west line of said Lot 1 S0°34'37"W a distance of 114.52 feet to the southwest corner of said lot 1 also being a point on the north line of Certificate of Survey No. 1262; thence along the north line of said Certificate of Survey No. 1262 N89°30'02"W a distance of 1154.44 feet to the Point of Beginning. The area of the tract described is 18.07 acres, more or less. Tract 1A 18.07 ACRES AMEND E D P L A T C H E R R Y H I L L SUBDIV I S I O N 3 r d F I L I N G BIG DITCH PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATE We hereby certify the purpose of this survey is to retrace the existing Certificate of Survey No. 3034, and the Amended Plat of Cherry Hill Subdivision - 3rd Filing. No new tracts are hereby created; therefore this survey is exempt from review under both the Montana Subdivision and Platting ACT and the Montana Sanitation in Subdivisions ACT. This Certificate of Survey is filed in accordance with the provisions of MCA Section 76-3-404. New COS No. 3034-A, Tract 1A 18.07 ACRES JE N E A D R RO C H E L L E L N CHERR Y H I L L S D R W. MARYLAND LN LOT 1 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 1 352 SECTION 14 EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS 353 354 355 SECTION 15 PERPETUAL ROW 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 File Attachments for Item: 7. Planning: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Approving The Variance Requested By Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores To Allow Signage Exceeding The Height Limitations Of The Highway Commercial Zoning District. (Public Hearing September 9, 2025) 364 R25-____ Approve Love’s Variance Request RESOLUTION NO. R25-_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUESTED BY LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES TO ALLOW SIGNAGE EXCEEDING THE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS OF THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Laurel has adopted zoning regulations pursuant to §76-2-301 et seq., MCA, which establish standards for height, bulk, and location of structures including outdoor advertising signs; WHEREAS, Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, the Applicant, requested a variance from the maximum height requirement of 45 feet in the Highway Commercial (HC) District to allow outdoor signage exceeding this limitation; WHEREAS, the application was duly submitted on July 25, 2025, and the Laurel Zoning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 2025, to consider the variance request; WHEREAS, the Zoning Commission reviewed the application, supporting documentation, and testimony presented at the public hearing; WHEREAS, the Zoning Commission, based upon its findings of fact, determined that the variance request met the applicable standards of review for approval of a variance under the City’s zoning ordinance; WHEREAS, on August 25, 2025, the Zoning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the variance request by Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores to the City Council; WHEREAS, the City Council considered this matter by way of public hearing on the 9th day of September, 2025 at 6:30 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Zoning Commission’s recommendation, findings of fact, and supporting documentation, and determined that the variance request met the applicable standards of review for approval of a variance under the City’s zoning ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, as follows: 1. The City Council hereby approves the variance request submitted by Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores to allow signage in excess of the 45-foot height limitation established for the Highway Commercial (HC) District. 2. The variance approval is granted based upon the findings of fact and recommendation of the Laurel Zoning Commission. 365 R25-____ Approve Love’s Variance Request 3. The variance shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval if the next logical step in the development process is not commenced, including but not limited to applying for a building permit, commencing the use, or applying for a Development Permit. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ______ day of ____________________, 2025 by Council Member _____________________. PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana on the ______ day of _____________, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor on the ______ day of ____________________, 2025. CITY OF LAUREL ___________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney 366 CITY HALL 115 W. 1ST ST. PLANNING: 628-4796 WATER OFC.: 628-7431 COURT: 628-1964 FAX 628-2241 City Of Laurel P.O. Box 10 Laurel, Montana 59044 Office of the City Planner Zoning Commission Recommendation VARIANCE REPORT VAR-25-01 Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores Height of Outdoor Advertising August 25, 2025 BACKGROUND: The City of Laurel has had zoning since the early 1970’s as authorized by §76-2-301 et. seq MCA. These regulations set minimum and maximum standards for all lands located with the jurisdiction of the City of Laurel. These regulations establish standards for the height, bulk, and location of structures (including outdoor advertising signs). The subject property was recently annexed into the City of Laurel and was ass igned the initial zoning of Highway Commercial (HC). The HC District imposes a maximum structure height of 45 feet. The applicant was aware of this standard at the time of annexation and has requested a variance as outlined in their application. The application materials address several other points that outline the anticipated benefits of the project. The application materials are incorporated into this report by reference. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Westbrook Subdivision, Lot 7A1, Amended Tract 6A and 7A and a portion of Tract 5 less Highway right-of-way in Section 17, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. APPLICANT(S): Love’s Travel Stops & Community Stores, Corporate Office 10601 N Pennsylvania Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73120 AGENT: Effective Images, Inc Kevin Keup 1027 5th Ave NW Watertown, SD 57201 367 EXISTING CONDITION: The subject property is a platted subdivision within the City of Laurel. The property is undeveloped and is intended to be served by public water, sewer, streets, and solid waste collection. The property is 34.239 acres in size. PROCESS:  The application for a Variance was submitted on July 25, 2025, and is scheduled for a public hearing on August 20, 2025 by the Laurel Zoning Commission.  The Zoning Commission following the Public Hearing must adopt findings of fact and issue a formal recommendation to the City Council on the requested variance. The Zoning Commission may propose conditions or modifications to the request so long as the findings of fact support the condition(s).  Those findings of fact and conclusions as well as the record minutes of the public hearing will be submitted to the City Council for consideration, hearing and final decision.  The City Council will conduct a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Zoning Commission recommendation, findings of fact, and any conditions mitigating the impacts associated with the request. This hearing will occur later in September. ZONES INVOLVED: Existing and Proposed  HC – Highway Commercial District. o The maximum height for a structure in the HC District is 45 feet. RATIONAL BASIS FOR VARIANCE: “Variance” means an adjustment in the application of the specific regulations of this title to a particular piece of property which property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Findings of Fact: Standard of Review A recommendation for Approval or Conditional Approval of a Variance shall require the Board of Adjustment making each of the following Findings of Fact: 1. Special Conditions There are special circumstances or conditions that are peculiar to the land or building for which the Variance is sought that do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood; and 2. Not Result of Applicant The special circumstances or conditions have not resulted from an act of the applicant or been established to circumvent this Ordinance; and 368 3. Strict Application Unreasonable Due to the special circumstances or conditions, the strict application of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land or building or create an undue hardship on the landowner; and 4. Necessary to Provide Reasonable Use Granting the Variance is necessary to provide a reasonable use of the land or building; and 5. Minimum Variance The Variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow a reasonable use of the land or building; and 6. Not Injurious Granting the Variance will not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare; and 7. Consistent with Ordinance Granting the Variance is consistent with the purposes and intent of this Ordinance. A variance to the Allowed Uses of a zoning district is prohibited. CONDITIONS Conditions or restrictions may be placed on the approval of a Variance. EXPIRATION A Variance shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval if the next logical step in the development process is not commenced. The next step in the development process includes but is not limited to applying for a building permit, commencing the use, or applying for a Development Permit. Findings of Fact: RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Commission (on a 6-1 Vote) Recommends that the City Council APPROVE the variance request and allow for signage at the Love’s Travel Stops and Country Store that exceeds the limits of the Highway Commercial Zoning District. 369 370 1027 5th Ave. NW | Watertown, SD 57201 | 605.753.9700 August 25th, 2023 Re: Sign Survey – Laurel, MT Property Locaon: Northeast quadrant of I-90 and Hwy 90 Intersecon; Exit 432 Survey Date: July 25th, 2023 Blimp Informaon: Located on the Southwest corner of the property , 105’ OAH Latude: 45.664800 / Longitude: 108.798960 / Google Earth Elevaon: 3322’ The blimp used in this survey was at 105’ OAH located at the Southwest corner of the property . The Hi-Rise sign superimposed in this survey reflects a structure that is 145’ OAH located at the spot of the property. Westbound traffic will have a full read on the sign 0.8 miles from the exit and will connue to have a full read on the sign unl they reach the off-ramp exit. Eastbound traffic will have their inial read on the Hi-Rise sign at 1 mile from the exit . They will have a read on the top poron of the sign as they head over a bridge. As they approach 0.9 miles from the exit, they will have a full read on the sign. Traffic will connue to have a full read on the sign unl they reach a stretch of trees between 0.7 and 0.4 miles where the sign will intermiently appear from the tree obstrucons. Once they reach 0.3 miles from the exit they will have a full read on the sign unl they approach the off -ramp exit. The property is located within the county, and they do not have a sign code. We would recommend a sign that is 145’ OAH located at the Southwest corner of the property. This will provide a good read on the sign for both Westbound and Eastbound traffic. 145’ OAH will allow better visibility over the trees and billboard while traveling Eas tbound. A preliminary filing with the FAA was submied and we were given a no -hazard determinaon for the proposed sign structure’s height and locaon. No addional follow-up will be required, however, any height and/or locaon change of the structure would require a new filing to confirm compliance with the FAA requirements. Once you have had a chance to review the informaon, please let us know if you have any quesons. Thank You, Kevin Keup Effecve Images, Inc. Emailed: Greg Love, Chad Bruner, Frank Ille, Shawn Baker , Kari Keup 371 N E S W = BLIMP & RECOMMENDED SIGN LOCATION LAUREL, MT 372 WESTBOUND 1.0 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.9 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.8 MILES FROM EXIT 373 WESTBOUND 0.7 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.6 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.5 MILES FROM EXIT 374 WESTBOUND 0.4 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.3 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND 0.2 MILES FROM EXIT 375 WESTBOUND 0.1 MILES FROM EXIT WESTBOUND AT EXIT 376 EASTBOUND 1.0 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.9 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.8 MILES FROM EXIT 377 EASTBOUND 0.7 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.6 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.5 MILES FROM EXIT 378 EASTBOUND 0.4 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.3 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND 0.2 MILES FROM EXIT 379 EASTBOUND 0.1 MILES FROM EXIT EASTBOUND AT EXIT 380 381 RV RV RV RVRV RV RV RV VI C I N I T Y M A P ( N T S ) SI T E P L A N SP -0 1 PRELIMINAR Y TR A VE L S TOP LA UR E L , M TSTORMSTORM 382 File Attachments for Item: 8. Planning: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Approving A Conditional Use Permit For Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, Based Upon The Recommendation Of The Laurel Zoning Commission. 383 R25-____ Approve Conditional Use Permit for Love’s RESOLUTION NO. R25-_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, BASED UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE LAUREL ZONING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City of Laurel has adopted zoning regulations pursuant to §76-2-301, et seq., MCA, establishing standards for land use, building, and development within the City; WHEREAS, Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, through its authorized agent, submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit for recreational vehicle parking in the Highway Commercial (HC) zoning district, located in Westbrook Subdivision, Lot 7A1, Amended Tract 6A and 7A and a portion of Tract 5 less Highway right-of-way in Section 17, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana; WHEREAS, the Laurel Zoning Commission held its duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2025, reviewed the application, supporting documentation, and public comment, and adopted findings of fact in accordance with the Standard of Review established by the City Council; WHEREAS, the Laurel Zoning Commission, on a unanimous vote, found that the application and supporting documentation meet or exceed the Standard of Review and recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this matter by way of public hearing on the 9th day of September, 2025 at 6:30 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Zoning Commission’s recommendation, findings of fact, and supporting documentation, and determined that the application meets the requirements of the Laurel Zoning Regulations, including consistency with the Growth Policy, compatibility with surrounding uses, minimization of adverse impacts, protection of public health and safety, and compliance with applicable codes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, as follows: 1. The Conditional Use Permit application of Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores for recreational vehicle parking in the Highway Commercial zoning district is hereby APPROVED. 2. This approval is subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of the Laurel Municipal Code, zoning regulations, and any conditions deemed necessary by the City to preserve public health, safety, and welfare. 384 R25-____ Approve Conditional Use Permit for Love’s 3. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval if the next step in the development process is not commenced, including but not limited to application for a building permit, commencement of the use, or application for a Development Permit. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ____________________, 2025, by Council Member ________________. PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the _____ day of ____________________, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor the _____ day of ____________________, 2025. CITY OF LAUREL ___________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney 385 CITY HALL 115 W. 1ST ST. PUB. WORKS: 628-4796 WATER OFC.: 628-7431 COURT: 628-1964 FAX 628-2241 City Of Laurel P.O. Box 10 Laurel, Montana 59044 Office of the Director of Public Works Zoning Commission Recommendation CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REPORT CUP-25-02 Owl Café – On Premise Alcohol Sales and Consumption August 25, 2025 INTRODUCTION On Friday, June 27, 2025, Shelly Van Atta submitted a Special Review Application for onsite sales and consumption of alcohol within the Laurel Central Business Zoning District (CBZD). The property involved in the request is the Owl Café owned by Jodi Roberg, 203 East Main, and is described as Laurel Realty Subdivision, Block 2 Lots 7, 8, and 9, Section 09, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. The project will be presented to the Laurel – Yellowstone City County Planning Board on August 20, 2025, with a recommendation to the Laurel City Council for final decision in late September. PLANNER RESPONSIBILITY A. Consult with other departments of the City or County to evaluate the impact of the special review upon public facilities and services; ACCOMPLISHED B. Study each application with reference to it appropriateness and effect on existing and proposed land use, and reference to the comprehensive plan; ACCOMPLISHED C. Advertise twice in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdictional area of the Laurel – Yellowstone City County Planning Board; ACCOMPLISHED D. Notify by mail, the applicant or his agent at least five days prior to the date of the public hearing of the date, time and place of such hearing; ACCOMPLISHED E. Notify, by mail, all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property subject to the special review of the date, time and location of the public hearing; ACCOMPLISHED F. After the public hearing and as part of the public record, report findings and conclusions and recommendations to the Zoning Commission. ACCOMPLISHED 386 STANDARD OF REVIEW Zoning Commission/City Council  The request complies with the requirements of §17.68.040 of the City of Laurel Zoning;  The request is consistent with the objectives and purpose of Title 17 of the Laurel Municipal Code;  The proposed use is compatible with surrounding land use or is otherwise screened and separated from adjacent land in such a way as to minimize adverse effects;  The zoning commission shall consider and may impose modification or conditions concerning, but not limited to: o Street and road capacity, o Ingress and egress to adjoining streets, o Off-street parking, o Fencing, screening and landscaping. o Building bulk and location, o Usable open space, o Signs and lighting, o Noise, vibration, air pollution and similar environmental influences. VARIANCES REQUESTED N/A. None Requested. RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Commission (on a 5-2 Vote) finds that the application, supporting documentation meet or exceeds the Standard of Review and Recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use for the onsite sale and consumption of alcohol at the Owl Café (203 East Main, and is described as Laurel Realty Subdivision, Block 2 Lots 7, 8, and 9, Section 09, Township 02 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., City of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana). 387 File Attachments for Item: 9. Public Works: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Authorizing The Mayor To Execute An Independent Contractor Service Contract With True North Contracting. 388 R25-__ Approve Independent Contractor Service Contract by and between the City of Laurel and True North Contracting RESOLUTION NO. R25-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR SERVICE CONTRACT WITH TRUE NORTH CONTRACTING. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, Section 1: Approval. The Independent Contractor Service Contract by and between the City of Laurel (hereinafter “the City”) and True North Contracting, a copy attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby approved. Section 2: Execution. The Mayor is hereby given authority to execute the Independent Contractor Service Contract with True North Contracting on behalf of the City. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 9th day of September 2025, by Council Member ____. PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the 9th day of September 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor the 9th day of September 2025. CITY OF LAUREL ___________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney 389 Page 1 of 5 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR SERVICE CONTRACT This Contract is made and entered into this 9th day of September, 2025, between the City of Laurel, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Montana whose address is P.O. Box 10, Laurel, Montana 59044, hereinafter referred to as “City” and True North, a contractor licensed to conduct business in the State of Montana, whose address is 9431 Anglers Way, Billings, Montana 59101, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”. SECTION ONE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES A. Purpose. City shall hire Contractor as an independent contractor to perform for City the services described in the Bid dated June 4, 2025, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference made part of this contract. B. Effective Date. This contract is effective upon the date of its execution by both Parties. Contractor shall complete the services within 60 days of commencing work. The parties may extend the term of this contract in writing prior to its termination for good cause. C. Scope of Work. Contractor shall perform his/her work and provide services in accordance with the specifications and requirements of this contract, any applicable Montana Public Work Standard(s) and Exhibit “A”. SECTION TWO CONTRACT PRICE Payment. City shall pay Contractor fourteen thousand four hundred dollars and no cents ($14,400.00) for the work described in Exhibit A. Any alteration or deviation form the described work that involves extra costs must be executed only upon written request by the City to Contractor and will become an extra charge over and above the contract amount. The parties must agree to extra payments or charges in writing. Prior to final payment, Contractor shall provide City with an invoice for all charges. SECTION THREE CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES Upon completion of the contract and acceptance of the work, City shall pay Contractor the contract price, plus or minus any additions or deductions agreed upon between the parties in accordance with Sections one and two, if any. SECTION FOUR CONTRACTOR’S WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. Independent Contractor Status. The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this contract and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose hereunder. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies or handbook and shall not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings, agreements or su b- contracts in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. The City is interested solely in the 390 Page 2 of 5 results of this contract. Contractor is solely responsible for all work and work product under this contract, including techniques, sequences, procedures, and means. Contractor shall supervise and direct the work to the best of his/her ability. B. Wages and Employment. Contractor shall abide by all applicable State of Montana Rules, Regulations and/or Statutes in regards to prevailing wages and employment requirements. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of his/her business, except for those members who are exempted as independent contractors under the provisions of §39-71-401, MCA. Contractor understands that all contractors or subcontractors working on publicly funded projects are required to have withheld from earnings a license fee of one percent (1%) of the gross contract price if the gross contract price is Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or more. This license fee is paid to the Montana Department of Revenue pursuant to Montana law. C. Unless otherwise specified by the terms of this Agreement, all m aterials and equipment used by Contractor on the Construction Project shall be new and where not otherwise specified, of the most suitable grade for their intended uses. D. All workmanship and materials shall be of a kind and nature acceptable to the City. E. All equipment, materials, and labor provided to, on, or for the Contract must be free of defects and nonconformities in design, materials, and workmanship for a minimum period beginning with the commencement of the work and ending one (1) year from completion and final acceptance by the City. Upon receipt of City’s written notice of a defective or nonconforming condition during the warranty period, Contractor shall take all actions, including redesign and replacement, to correct the defective or nonconforming condition within a time frame acceptable to the City and at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall also, at its sole cost, perform any tests required by City to verify that such defective or nonconforming condition has been corrected. Contractor warrants the corrective action taken against defective and nonconforming conditions for a period of an additional one (1) year from the date of City’s acceptance of the corrective action. F. Contractor and its sureties are liable for the satisfaction and full performance of all warranties. G. Contractor has examined the facilities and/or has made field examinations. Contractor has knowledge of the services or project sought under this Contract and he/she further understands the site conditions to be encountered during the performance of this Contract. Contractor has knowledge of the types and character of equipment necessary for the work, the types of materials needed and the sources of such materials, and the condition of the local labor market. H. Contractor is responsible for the safety of the work and shall maintain all lights, guards, signs, temporary passages, or other protections necessary for that purpose at all times. I. All work is performed at Contractor’s risk, and Contractor shall promptly repair or replace all damage and loss at its sole cost and expense regardless of the reason or cause of the damage or loss; provided, however, should the damage or loss be caused by an intentional or negligent act of the City, the risk of such loss shall be placed on the City. J. Contractor is responsible for any loss or damage to materials, tools, work product or other articles 391 Page 3 of 5 used or held for use in the completion or performance of the Contract. K. Title to all work, work product, materials and equipment covered by any payment of Contractor’s compensation by City, whether directly incorporated into the Contract or not, passes to City at the time of payment, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. SECTION FIVE INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE Contractor shall indemnify, defend and save City, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all losses, damage and liability occasioned by, growing out of, or in any way arising or resulting from any intentional or negligent act on the part of Contractor or its agents or employees. SECTION SIX COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. Contractor shall either possess a City business license or shall purchase one, if a City Code requires a business license. SECTION SEVEN NONDISCRIMINATION Contractor agrees that any hiring of persons as a result of this contract must be on the basis of merit and qualification and further that Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, physical or mental disability or national origin. SECTION EIGHT DEFAULT If either party fails to comply with any term or condition of this Contract at the time or in the manner provided for, the other party may, at its option, terminate this Contract and be released from all obligations if the default is not cured within ten (10) days after written notice is provided to the defaulting party. Said notice shall set forth the items to be cured. Additionally, the non-defaulting party may bring suit for damages, specific performance, and any other remedy provided by law except for punitive damages. The Parties hereby waive their respective claims for punitive damages. These remedies are cumulative and not exclusive. Use of one remedy does not preclude use of the others. Notices shall be provided in writing and hand-delivered or mailed to the parties at the addresses set forth in the first paragraph of this Contract. SECTION NINE TERMINATION Either party may terminate the contract for their convenience upon thirty days written notice sent postage prepaid, to the addresses provided herein. 392 Page 4 of 5 SECTION TEN GOVERNING LAW AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION The Parties agree that the laws of the State of Montana govern this Contract. The Parties agree that venue is proper within the Courts of Yellowstone County, Montana. If a dispute arises, the Parties, through a representative(s) with full authority to settle a dispute, shall meet and attempt to negotiate a resolution of the dispute in good faith no later than ten business days after the dispute arises. If negotiations fail, the Parties may utilize a third-party mediator and equally share the costs of the mediator or file suit. SECTION ELEVEN ATTORNEY FEES If any action is filed in relation to this agreement, the unsuccessful party in the action shall pay to the successful party, in addition to all sums that either is ordered to pay, a reasonable sum for the successful party’s attorney’s fees and all costs charges and expenses related to the action. SECTION TWELVE ENTIRE AGREEMENT This contract and its referenced attachment and Exhibit A contain the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and supersede any and all prior negotiations or understandings relating to this project. This contract shall not be modified, amended, or changed in any respect except through a written document signed by each party’s authorized respective agents. SECTION THIRTEENTH ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS The rights of each party under this Contract are personal to that party and may not be assigned or transferred to any other person, firm, corporation, or other entity without the prior, express, and written consent of the other party. SECTION FOURTEEN SEVERABILITY Each provision, section, or subsection of this Contract shall stand separate and independent of every other. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction shall find any provision, section, or subsection of this contract to be invalid, the remaining provisions, sections, and subsections of this contract shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION FIFTEEN PARAGRAPH HEADINGS The titles to the paragraphs of this contract are solely for the convenience of the parties and shall not be used to explain, simplify, or aid in the interpretation of the provisions of this agreement. 393 5 of 5 SIGNED AND AGREED BY BOTH PARTIES ON THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025. CITY OF LAUREL CONTRACTOR ___________________________________ __________________________ Dave Waggoner, Mayor True North ATTEST: Employer Identification Number ___________________________________ __________________________ Kelly Strecker, Clerk/Treasurer 394 395