HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. R24-33BRESOLUTION NO. R24-33B
RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2 OF NUTTING BROTHERS SUBDIVISION,
SECOND FILING, LOT 1A, ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, AS AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA,
WITH CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION UPON
ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, a Petition for Annexation was submitted to the City of Laurel by the Laurel
Public Schools, who is the property owner (hereinafter "Petitioner") of certain real property
situated in Yellowstone County, Montana;
WHEREAS, the real property is generally described as the Amended Plat of Lots 1 &
2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot IA, Yellowstone County, Montana. The
real property is generally reflected on the Exhibits to the Petition for Annexation, which is
incorporated by reference herein, and it includes all contiguous roadways and rights -of -way;
WHEREAS, the property is currently unzoned, and Petitioner intends to utilize the
property, if annexed, for a Public Elementary School;
WHEREAS, the property is currently outside of City of Laurel City limits, and
Petitioner seeks annexation of the property and a concurrent Zoning Designation as "Public";
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of Laurel's Annexation Policy, the City Council shall
consider various criteria when it receives a written Petition for Annexation, which are fully
incorporated by reference herein;
WHEREAS, further pursuant to the City of Laurel's Annexation Policy, the City
Council may decide to either condition the approval of the annexation in order to meet the
criteria listed in the City of Laurel's Annexation Policy or require an Annexation Agreement;
WHEREAS, Petitioner currently seeks annexation of its property into the City of
Laurel, contingent upon completion of the terms of the Annexation Agreement, attached hereto
and fully incorporated herein, which identifies required off -site infrastructure improvements
and guarantees of those improvements;
WHEREAS, in addition to annexation contingent upon completion of the terms of the
Annexation Agreement, the City of Laurel's Annexation Policies require the mutual -approval
of a Development Agreement between the City and Petitioner, and the aforementioned
Development Agreement is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein;
WHEREAS, the Laurel City -County Planning Board held a duly advertised public
hearing on Petitioner's Petition for Zoning Designation on March 20, 2024. At the conclusion
R24-33B Annexation of Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot IA
of the hearing, the Planning Board voted to recommend approval to the City Council of the
Zoning Designation, conditioned upon approval of the proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing regarding
Petitioner's Petition for Annexation and Concurrent Approval of Zoning Designation on April
23, 2024. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council determined that approval of the
Petition for Annexation and Concurrent Approval of Zoning Designation is in the best interests
of the City at this time;
WHEREAS, the annexation of the property and zoning is subject to an Annexation
Agreement by and between the City of Laurel and the Petitioner, which will be executed by
and between the Petitioner and the City of Laurel and will be attached hereto and fully
incorporated as part of this Resolution. In addition, the final annexation of the property and
zoning is subject to a Development Agreement by and between the City of Laurel and the
Petitioner, which will be executed by and between the Petitioner and the City of Laurel and
will be attached to all final annexation documents and Resolution(s), once all conditions of
approval, including execution and completion of a Development Agreement, are completed by
the Petitioner.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel,
Montana, as follows:
1. The owner of record of the territory annexed to the City of Laurel has executed
a Petition of Annexation.
2. Pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. § 7-2-46, the incorporated boundaries of the City
of Laurel shall be and the same hereby is extended and/or expanded to include
the territory described in Petitioner's Petition for Annexation and all attached
Exhibits.
3. The following described territory is hereby annexed to the City of Laurel:
Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing,
Lot IA, Yellowstone County, Montana. The real property is generally reflected
on the Exhibits to the Petition for Annexation, which is incorporated by
reference herein, and it includes all contiguous roadways and rights -of -way.
4. The owner of record of the territory annexed to the City of Laurel and the City
of Laurel will execute an Annexation Agreement, which terms and conditions
are made a part of this Resolution and the Petition for Annexation.
5. The owner of record of the territory annexed to the City of Laurel and the City
of Laurel -will --execute a Develogment Agreement, which terms and conditions
are made a part of this Resolution and the Petition for Annexation.
R24-33B Annexation of Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot IA
6. That the approval of the annexation is conditioned as follows:
A. On all terms, conditions, and requirements of the Annexation Agreement
and Development Agreement between the City of Laurel and Petitioner.
B. The Waiver of Right to Protest, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, and this Resolution, shall be recorded
with the County Clerk and Recorder within ninety (90) days after the
adoption of this Resolution.
C. Connections to the City of Laurel Water and Sewer Systems shall be
approved by the City of Laurel's Public Works Department.
D. Laurel's Public Works Department shall approve all terms and
conditions of the Development Agreement, as well as compliance with
the same.
E. All improvements and infrastructure connections shall be completed
within one calendar year from the date this Resolution is approved.
7. That the approval of the zoning designation is conditioned upon approval of the
annexation, and upon approval of the annexation, the property shall be zoned as
"Public."
8. This Resolution shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the City
Council, and upon said incorporation, the City Clerk -Treasurer shall file a true
and correct certified copy of this Resolution and Meeting Minutes with the
Yellowstone County Clerk and Recorder.
9. From and after the date that the City Clerk -Treasurer files such certified copy
of this Resolution and of the City Council Meeting Minutes with the
Yellowstone County Clerk and Recorder, this Annexation of the above -
described territory to the City of Laurel shall be deemed complete and final.
10. Annexation and the City's responsibility for providing service to the property
shall become null and void upon Petitioner's failure to satisfy the conditions
imposed by the City Council by and through this Resolution, the Petition for
Annexation, and the Annexation Agreement by and between the City of Laurel
and the Petitioner.
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14"' day of May 2024, by
Council -Member Sparks.
R24-33B Annexation of Amended Plat of Lots I & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot IA
PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the 14`' day of
May 2024.
APPROVED by the Mayor the 141h day of May 2024.
CITY OF LA L
a4z )'%� �
t'—
Dave Waggoner, Matof
ATTEST:
F�5m'. � ,_ /'l - . 0'►
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney
R24-33B Annexation of Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot IA
AFFIDAVIT OF WAIVER OF PROTEST
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND CREATION OF
ANY FUTURE SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
The undersigned hereby waives protest to the annexation of the property described below by the
City of Laurel. Undersigned also waives their right to seek judicial review under M.C.A.
§ 7-2-4741 (2007), subsequent to the City's annexation of the below described property.
The undersigned hereby additionally waives protest to the creation of future Special Improvement
District(s) created and/or formed for future street improvements including, but not limited to, paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage or any other lawful purpose.
This Affidavit is submitted pursuant to and as a part of the Annexation Agreement and future
contemplated Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City of Laurel.
This Affidavit of Waiver shall run with the land and shall forever be binding upon the Grantee, their
transferees, successors and assigns.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY:
11 Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing, Lot 1A )f
DATED this r-si day of 120
Ulf
Laurel Public Schools
Grantee Name
(Company..)
STATE OF Montana )
) ss.
County of Yellowstone )
On this��of , 20A�Y, personally appeared before me,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged the he/she/they executed
the same.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal on the day
and year in this certificate first above written.
�,t•STRFt: KELLY STRECKER tK(o ry u the State of %
'gym NOTARY PUBLIC for the
(SE ;'�P State of Montana si ing
Ste- Residing atBgtiom, Montana My Commission pires. .ZUo2�
My Commission Expaes
Match 5, 2028
1
� '..r• Y�A
u �.
1�+ 4j
pq h•3 �74. J.�T.(a �'L'F'!}.
� �ur �- � `��
,
f
ti�.�
�yc� � Y
Return to:
Laurel Public Schools
410 Colorado Ave.
Laurel, Montana 59044
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT is made this Leday of ,
2024, by and between the LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS, with a mailing addressIL,
10
Colorado Avenue, Laurel, Montana 59044, (the "Owner"), and the CITY Off' LA
MONTANA, a municipality within the State of Montana, with a mailing address at 115
West 1st Street, Laurel, Montana, 59044 (the "City").
WHEREAS, the Owner is the owner of certain real property situated in Yellowstone
County, Montana, more particularly described as follows:
Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing Lot
IA; according to the official plat on file and of record in the office of the Clerk
and Recorder of said County, hereinafter referred to as "Owner Tract" as well as
all adjacent public right-of-way.
WHEREAS, the Owner has submitted to the City a Petition for Annexation to the
City for Owner Tract; and
WHEREAS, the Owner desires to annex Owner Tract to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved the Petition for Annexation by Resolution No.
for the Owner Tract contingent on the conditions of approval contained
herein, as well as that a Development Agreement be executed between the City and the
Owner to identify required off -site infrastructure improvements and guarantees of those
improvements, as well as any other matters required by the City in order to ensure proper
annexation
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. Roads and Access. The Owner Tract shall be accessible by Alder Avenue and East
8th Street. No surface improvements to Alder Avenue or East 8th Street will be constructed
upon annexation beyond pavement restoration for utility extensions. The City shall rely on
the attached Waiver filed concurrently herewith, to ensure the installation of any or all future
public road-improvei e—nts. — -- - —
P:23103_Laurel_Public Schools Annexation_Agrmt 1 (4/11/24) BSA/vp
2. Water System Extension. The Owner Tract shall be served by the City Water
System. Owner intends to tie into the existing water mains in Alder Ave. and extend them
north to the intersection of Alder Ave. and E. Maryland Lane. This extension goes beyond
the boundaries of the property being annexed. The new waterline shall be an 8-inch water
main. Owner shall provide a Water System Design Report. The installation shall meet the
requirements of MTDEQ Circular 1. The Water System Design must be reviewed and
approved by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements of the newly -adopted City of
Laurel Standards for Public Works Improvements.
3. Sanitary Sewer System Extension. The Owner Tract shall be served by the City
Sanitary Sewer System. No improvements other than service connection are contemplated
herein. Owner shall provide a Sanitary Sewer System Design Report that estimates the
amount of wastewater production from the school and clearly demonstrates that adjacent
sewer mains have capacity to accept those additional flows. The Sanitary Sewer System
Design must be reviewed and approved by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements
of the newly -adopted City of Laurel Standards for Public Works Improvements.
4. Storm Sewer Collection System. Owner shall provide a Storm Sewer Collection
System Design Report that demonstrates the available capacities of the downstream Storm
Sewer Collection System. The Storm Sewer System Design must be reviewed and approved
by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements of the newly -adopted City of Laurel
Standards for Public Works Improvements.
5. Right -of -Way. All rights -of -way for Alder Avenue and East 8th Street have been
previously dedicated. No additional rights -of -way dedications are proposed.
6. Other Public Improvements. For any other improvements not specifically listed in
this Agreement, the City shall rely on the attached Waiver filed concurrently herewith, to
ensure the installation of any or all remaining public improvements. Said improvements shall
include, but not be limited to, street construction and paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks,
driveways, storm drainage, and street lighting. The attached Waiver, waiving the right to
protest the creation of one or more Special Improvement Districts, by this reference is
expressly incorporated herein and part hereof. All of the Owner properties can be included
in a Special Improvements District for improvements identified in Annexation Agreement
regardless of location of individual properties in relation to the improvements.
7. Development Agreement. This Agreement, and any approval of annexation of the
property, pursuant to the Owner's Petition for Annexation, is contingent upon a mutually-,
agreeable Development Agreement between Owner and the City. Should Owner and the
City not be able to reach a mutually -agreeable Development Agreement, Owner
acknowledges and fully understands that any previously -approved annexation of the
property will be considered null and void.
8. Future Intersection Contributions. No intersection contributions are required upon
annexation.
P:23103_Laurel_Public Schools Annexation Agrmt 2 (4/11/24) BSA/vp
9. Late Comers Agreement. No Late Comers Agreement is made with this annexation.
10. Zonina. The Property is to be zoned as Public.
11. Compliance. Nothing herein shall be deemed to exempt the Owner Tract from
compliance with any current or future City laws, rules, regulations, or policies that are
applicable to the development, redevelopment, or use of the subject property.
12. Runs with Land. The covenants, agreements, and all statements in this Agreement
and in the incorporated and attached Waiver shall run with the land and shall be binding on
the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the respective parties.
13. Attorney's Fees. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement
to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give
any notice required herein, then the prevailing parry or the parry giving notice shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs, including those fees and costs of in-house
counsel.
14. Amendments and Modifications. Any amendments or modifications of this
Agreement shall be made in writing and executed in the same manner as this original
document and shall after execution become a part of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.
STATE OF MONTANA
ss.
County of Yellowstone
LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Title:
Y
"Owner"
On thisi&?/ ay of MW_, 2024, befo me, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Montana, personally ap ared Y ,known to me to be
the person who signed the foregoing instrument as of Laurel
Public Schools, and who acknowledged to me that said thl Owner executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial
Seal the day and year hereinabove written.
P:23103_Laurel_Public Schools_Annexation Agrmt 3 (4/11/24) BSA/vp
STRFc MLYSTREM
V
F
�. �p?ARIA p
NOTARYPUBMIKN»
SEAL *
oft of MOIN
Raft it Molftmy cbl�tiomL
9�OF MAP
E
MrCh 5, 2MB
Printed nffn
Residing at:
My commission
tate of
P:23103 Laurel_Public Schools_Annexation Agrmt 4 (4/11/24) BSA/vp
j�IE� Y� CJ i a: i t t
This Agreement is hereby approved and accepted by the City of Laurel, this day
of \\j\a 20 21- .
if U
=r
off., . • ► ;:•'.
f ..
�irrr►i n n u�"`
STATE OF MONTANA
;*l
County of Yellowstone
CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA
By: �
Mayor
Attest:
1 erk
. ccryityee
On this day of , 2024, before me, a Notary Public for
the State of Montana, personally appeared - d a , and
known to me to -'be the Mayor and City Clerk,
respectively, of the City of Laurel, Montana, whose names are subscribed to the foregoing
instrument in such capacity and acknowledged to me that they executed the same on behalf
of the City of Laurel, Montana.
�R Hq p AMBER HATTON
S o*
NOTARY PUBLIC for the
Q
y'•.,,. 'P?
State of Montana
Residing at Billings, Montana
'fioF Mod
My Commission Expires
May 31, 2026
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
lk��
N ary Public in and for the State of Montana
Printed name:
Residing at: T
My commission expires: l ,
P:23103_Laurel_Public Schools_Annexation Agrmt 5 (4/11/24) BSA/vp
_
'
a
Return to:
Laurel Public Schools
410 Colorado Ave.
Laurel, Montana 59044
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is made this � �— day of Y�1; ,
2024, by and between the LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS, with a mailing address at 410
Colorado Avenue, Laurel, Montana 59044, (the "Owner"), and the CITY OF LAUREL,
MONTANA, a municipality within the State of Montana, with a mailing address at 115
West 1 st Street, Laurel, Montana, 59044 (the "City").
WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property situated in Yellowstone
County, Montana, more particularly described as follows (the "Owner Tract"):
Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision Second Filing Lot
IA; according to the official plat on file and of record in the office of the Clerk
and Recorder of said County, hereinafter referred to as "Owner Tract" as well as
all adjacent public right-of-way.
WHEREAS, Owner has submitted to the City a Petition for Annexation to the City
for Owner Tract; and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to annex Owner Tract to the City; and
WH REAS, the City has approved the Petition for Annexation by Resolution No.
for the Owner Tract contingent on the conditions of approval contained in
the Annexation Agreement and this Development Agreement, as well as any other matters
required by the City in order to ensure proper annexation.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
Development Summary. The Development consists of the development and
construction of the Owner Tract to be utilized for a public school, consisting
of associated site improvements, including parking, sidewalks, infrastructure,
landscaping, water and sanitary sewer system extensions, signage, and
roadway access.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -
2. Roads and Access. Upon completion of the in -street utility and utility
connections, Owner will install a two-inch asphalt overlay, which shall be
installed across the entire width of asphalt along E. 8th Street and Alder Ave.
The overlay shall be from, to, and including the intersection of E. 8th Street
and Alder Ave., north along Alder Ave., from, to, and including the
intersection with E. Maryland Lane. The overlay on E. 8th Street shall be
from, to, and including the intersection of E. 8th Street and Alder Ave. east
along E. 8th Street from, to, and including the property Owner's eastern
property line. The two-inch asphalt overlay must be reviewed and approved
by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements of the newly -adopted
City of Laurel Standards for Public Works Improvements.
Signage. Owner shall install stop signs on the east and west ends of E.
Maryland Lane at its intersection with Alder Ave. (making that intersection
a 4-way stop), at any exit from Owner's property to adjacent streets, and on
E. 8th Street where E. 8a' Street intersects with Alder Ave. Owner shall also
install "No Parking" signs along Alder Ave. on Owner's side of the street
from E. 8th Street to E. Maryland Lane. The number and distance between
signs shall be governed by the latest edition of the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD).
4. Water System Extension. The Owner Tract shall be served by the City Water
System. Owner intends to tie into the existing water mains in Alder Ave. and
extend them north to the intersection of Alder Ave. and E. Maryland Lane.
This extension goes beyond the boundaries of the property being annexed.
The new waterline shall be an 8-inch water main. Owner shall provide a
Water System Design Report. The installation shall meet the requirements
of MTDEQ Circular 1. The Water System Design must be reviewed and
approved by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements of the newly -
adopted City of Laurel Standards for Public Works Improvements.
Sanitary Sewer System Extension. The Owner Tract shall be served by the
City Sanitary Sewer System. No improvements other than service connection
are contemplated herein. Owner shall provide a Sanitary Sewer System
Design Report that estimates the amount of wastewater production from the
school and clearly demonstrates that adjacent sewer mains have capacity to
accept those additional flows. The Sanitary Sewer System Design must be
reviewed and approved by the City of Laurel and must meet all requirements
of the newly -adopted City of Laurel Standards for Public Works
Improvements.
6. Storm Sewer Collection _S sy tem. Owner shall provide a Storm Sewer
Collection System Design Report that demonstrates the available capacities
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 2
of the downstream Storm Sewer Collection System. The Storm Sewer
System Design must be reviewed and approved by the City of Laurel and
must meet all requirements of the newly -adopted City of Laurel Standards
for Public Works Improvements.
7. Other Public Improvements. For any other improvements not specifically
listed in this Agreement, the City shall rely on the Owner's Waiver filed
concurrently herewith, to ensure the installation of any or all remaining public
improvements. The Waiver, waiving the right to protest the creation of one
or more Special Improvement Districts, by this reference is expressly
incorporated herein and part hereof. All of the Owner's Property can be
included in a Special Improvements District for improvements identified in
both this Agreement and the parties' Annexation Agreement regardless of
location of individual properties in relation to the improvements. All other
public improvements must be reviewed and approved by the City of Laurel
and must meet all requirements of the newly -adopted City of Laurel
Standards for Public Works Improvements.
8. Zonin-a. The Owner Tract shall be zoned Public (P)
9. Compliance. Nothing herein shall be deemed to exempt the Owner Tract
from compliance with any current or future City laws, rules, regulations, or
policies that are applicable to the development, redevelopment, or use of the
subject property.
10. Runs with Land. The covenants, agreements, and all statements in this
Agreement and in the adopted Waiver shall run with the land and shall be
binding on the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the
respective parties.
11. Attorney's Fees. In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this
Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of
this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing party
or the party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and
costs, including those fees and costs of in-house counsel.
12. Amendments and Modifications. Any amendments or modifications of this
Agreement shall be made in writing and executed in the same manner as this
original document and shall after execution become a part of this Agreement.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.
STATE OF MONTANA
:ss
County of Yellowstone
CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA ("CITY")
By:
Mayor
Attest: 14V '-' C erk
On this —0L day of MW , 200 , before me, a Notary Public for
the State of Montana, personally appeared �caviut y)nGGo,.c� , and
�'f` sl 5\(-td4r , known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,
respectively, of the City of Laurel, Montana, whose names are subscribed to the foregoing
instrument in such capacity and acknowledged to me that they executed the same on behalf
of the City of Laurel, Montana.
15 H•grAMBER HATTON
c
Qr \,oT'•;Z
NOTARY PUBLIC for the
*��'�,••
State Of Montana
esiding at Billings, Montana
•SEA
9 b. .....
My May CommisWon E m
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
Notary Public in and for the State of Montana
Printed name:�,be„�.
Residing at: ;�2A,l I S VrT'I—
My commission expires31 Zoe �
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 4
pow,
LAUE.E;L PUBLIC SCHOD...S {"O3 NE11,
By:
Title: L _
STATE OF MONTANA
: ss.
County of Yellowstone
On this Z Z-day of G�' `� , 2024, before me, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Montana, personally a geared br ,' }fir , 14v o-}er- known to me to be
the person who signed the foregoing instrument as bo- rr,� [1>1c, ; r- of Laurel
Public Schools, and who acknowledged to me that said the Owner executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial
Seal the day and year hereinabove written.
LINDSEY
QSEY�+,
MCNEILEY
NOTARY PUBLIC for the
SEAL
a+_ ,=Q
STATE OF MONTANA
Residing in Laurel, Montana
9�oFo;�
MY Commission tires
...�
JULY 20, 2026
Notary Public in and for the State of Montana
Printed name: e:
Residing at: g a, , ,ram t , (' �yt T
My commission expires:- '7t0012o26
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 5
LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ("OWNER")
Title: ✓.��nr1 1.1f
STATE OF MONTANA )
SS.
County of Yellowstone )
On this flay of , 2024, bef�me, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Montana, personally app re , known to me to be
the person who signed the foregoing instrument as of Laurel
Public Schools, and who acknowledged to me that said the Owner executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial
Seal the day and year hereinabove written.
�� STRFc KELLYMECKER o P 1 i nd r the St to of M ntana
�`� �p7ARLti �p NOTARY PUBLIC for the Printed n me: e5
State of Montana Residing at:
�e Residing at Big Hom Montana ...........
"F MiMy Commission Expires My cornmissio xpires.
March 5, 2=
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - 5
Recommendation for zoning assignment for the
annexation application by the Laurel School District
LAUREL - YELLOWSTONE CITY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
The Laurel- Yellowstone City - County Planning Board acting as the zoning
commission for the City of Laurel voted unanimously on March 20th, 2024, to
recommend the assignment for a zoning designation of "Public" (P) if the City
Council of Laurel annexes lands owned by the Laurel School District described
as a portion of Lots 1 Et 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision Second Filing which is
anticipated to be amended. The amended tract of record will be the Amended
Plat of Lots 1 Et 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision Second Filing in Section 10
Township 2 South Range 24 East. The Planning Board held a public hearing and
allowed for written and in person testimony for or against the action to
recommend the zoning designation. The planning board considered the written
or in person testimony at the public hearing and completed a review of zoning
considerations when assigning zoning designations. The Planning Board believes
that this assignment of zoning is consistent with the 2020 Laurel Growth
Management Policy. The Laurel Yellowstone City- County Planning Board Public
Hearing was publicly noticed for at least 15 days in a newspaper of general
circulation within Yellowstone County. All property owners within 300 feet of
the school district propose lands to be annexed were notified of the date of the
public hearing. The planning board moved, seconded, and voted unanimously
to recommend to the City Council to approve the zoning designation of
"Public" (P) if the City of Laurel completes the annexation.
Dated this 11 th day of April 2024.
Lau r ---Ye—llowstone Cit County Planning Board
Ju& Goldsbv. Preside
CITY HALL o
115W.ISTST.
PUB. WORKS: 628-4796 ��'
WATER OFC.: 628-7431
COURT: 628-1964 P.O. Box 10
FAX 628-2241 Laurel, Montana 5904-4-
Office of the Planning Director
PLA1\TN1I1`�1G BOARD AND '7OI`�tING CODAMRSSffON
REC0Dy fVff ELI DA - 10N
Laurel Schoo® District
Annexation and Rnftlai Zoning
Applicant:
Laurel School District
410 Colorado Avenue
Laurel MT 59044
The School District represents 100% of the land ownership. Annexation pursuant to §7-2-4601
et. seq. MCA. (Annexation by Petition).
Request:
The Laurel School District representing 100% of the ownership of lands involved, has Petitioned
the City of Laurel for Annexation of approximately 4.886 acres of property adjacent to the City of
Laurel with an initial Zoning Designation of Public for concurrent review.
The subject property is generally described as that portion of NW 1/4 Section 10, Township 2
South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., Yellowstone County, Montana, for a proposed amended Nutting
Brothers Subdivision Second Filing Lot1A. An annexation Exhibit, which is incorporated into this
report by reference, has been submitted in support of the Petition and Requested Initial Zoning.
Process:
The annexation petition and requested initial zoning has been scheduled for consideration and a
public hearing by the Laurel — Yellowstone City County Planning Board and Zoning
Commission for 6 p.m. on Wednesday, March 20, 2024. The City, Council will consider the
annexation and zoning designation at a future council meeting.
Analysis of the Request
➢ The Laurel School District represents 100% of the land ownership involved in the petition.
➢ The Laurel Growth Policy designates the property as a `growth area' of the city.
➢ The current use of the property is a sports field that has been used by the school district for
many years.
➢ The requested zone City Laurel "Public" provides for a small number of specific uses and
is consistent with the requirements of R-08-22 that lands embraced by the city be assigned
R-7500 or greater.
➢ The subject property was presumed to be zoned County Residential Tracts or is un-zoned
Yellowstone County.
➢ Part 46 annexation requires that the land use designation be `consistent with the prevailing
use of the property, consistent with the prevailing County Zoning Assignment, and/or
consistent with the current growth policy'.
➢ In addition to the extension of urban scale services the City Zoning provides options for
development that are not available to rural properties. These options include but are not
limited to Planned Unit Developments
➢ The initial zoning must be considered under City Resolution R-08-22 (Annexation), the
Laurel Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning).
➢ The question of annexation and initial zoning must be heard by the Laurel — Yellowstone
City County Planning Board and Zoning Commission.
➢ Is the requested annexation and initial zoning in the best interest of the City and Citizens
of the City of Laurel.
➢ The property is situated such that street rights -of -way will need to be annexed with the
subject property.
Findings:
✓ The subject property is adjacent to the City of Laurel.
✓ The City Council is not required to submit the question of annexation to the qualified
electors of the area to be annexed as the petition is signed by 100% of the owners.
✓ The city may annex the property as 100% of the ownership of same has petitioned the city
for annexation.
✓ The driver for the annexation request is the building of an elementary school on the
property. The only way the development plan works is to extend the City water and sewer
systems to the proposed school.
✓ The subject property was included as `institutional" under existing land uses in the Growth
Policy adopted by the City of Laurel. Additionally, the property has been identified as an
annexation priority area of the Planning Jurisdiction Map in the 2020 Growth Policy. As
such, the requested zoning is consistent with the Laurel Growth Policy.
✓ The proposed assignment of "Public" meets all the statutory requirements of Part 46
annexation and zoning assignment.
✓ The Laurel "Public" Zone is determined to be a "greater than" R-7500 classification
density. Zoning assignments for government owned land is not subject to zoning
regulations typically required to other applicants. The Laurel School District meets the
definition of an "agency" in MCA 76-2402 and therefore can use their property as they
2
see fit as long as any changes in use contrary to local zoning regulations that the City
Council holds a public hearing.
✓ The extension of city services will be at the owner's expense (R-08-22) and in accordance
with the Annexation Agreement as approved by the City Council and requirements of the
Public Works Department.
✓ The city can provide services to the property both existing and proposed if extension of
water, sewer, and storm water lines are extended.
12 Point Test for Zoning:
Is the zoning in accordance with the growth policy;
• The proposed zoning is consistent with having a public agency own the land and to plan
for education for the community.
• The Growth Policy identifies all of the property proposed for annexation as an annexation
priority area.
• Resolution R-08-22 requires zoning assignment at annexation at R-7500 or greater.
• The Zone "Public" meets the definition as `greater than' R-7500.
Finding:
The requested zoning is in accordance with the Growth Policy.
Is the zoning designed to lessen congestion in the streets;
• The proposed zoning is consistent with a school zone already in the area just east of this
area.
• The proposed zoning along with the annexation agreement will allow development of the
property consistent with surrounding uses of property.
• Proposed development that would potentially impact roads and streets would require a
traffic impact analysis and associated improvements which has been completed.
Finding:
The requested zoning will have a material impact on congestion in the streets but should be
mitigated by the suggestions in the traffic impact analysis.
III. Is the zoning designed to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers;
• The Growth Policy identifies this property as institutional in the existing use map.
• Adequate public infrastructure exists or can be readily extended/expanded to serve the
property for "public" designation.
• Fire hydrants and water supply should be adequate if they meet the requirements from the
Public Works Department.
Finding:
The requested zoning will not have an adverse impact on safety from fire, panic, or other
dangers.
3
IV. Is the zoning designed to promote health and the general welfare;
• The connection of the school building at the time of development to the Laurel municipal
water and wastewater systems will have positive impacts to public health and general
welfare.
• Education meets the goals of promoting the growth management policy to serve the citizens
of the Laurel area.
Finding:
The requested zoning will promote the public health and the general welfare.
V. Is the zoning designed to provide adequate light and air;
• The existing zoning imposes building setbacks, height limits, limits on the number of
buildings on a single parcel, and reasonable area limits on new development.
• The proposed "Public" provides restrictions on structure height, setbacks, lot coverage.
These standards exist to provide open spaces and adequate light and air.
• The existing development has more than adequate separation from surrounding uses.
• Open spaces are planned to be reserved north of this property that the school district owns.
Finding
The requested zoning will provide adequate light and air.
VI. Is the zoning designed to prevent the overcrowding of land;
• The existing zoning imposes building setbacks, height limits, limits on the number of
buildings on a single parcel, and reasonable area limits on new development.
Finding:
The proposed zoning will prevent the overcrowding of land.
VII. Is the zoning designed to avoid undue concentration of population;
• The existing zoning imposes building setbacks, height limits, limits on the number of
buildings on a single parcel, and reasonable area limits on new development.
• The subject property is large enough to provide adequate separation from surrounding
uses.
• The property is not going to be used for residential development with the `'public"
designation.
Finding:
The proposed zoning will prevent the undue concentration of population.
n
Vlll. Is the zoning designed to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements;
• The requested zoning will allow for a school building and will be required to provide for
adequate water, sewerage or other public requirements.
Finding:
The requested zoning will facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Additionally, as the uses of the
property change and the intensity of development changes, the city will be able to plan for
and be prepared for the anticipated increased demands on their public systems.
IX. Does the zoning give reasonable consideration to the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for particular uses;
• The requested zoning is consistent with the Growth Policy.
• The property is compatible with surrounding development which is, for the most part,
school use just west of the property and would be a consolidation of education facilities
within the City of Laurel.
• The water and sewer infrastructure with this annexation is for the intended use of the
property and will need final approval from the City of Laurel City Council and the Public
Works Department.
Finding:
The requested zoning is consistent with surrounding uses, the Growth Policy and provides
for opportunities with suitable uses.
X. Does the zoning give reasonable consideration to the peculiar suitability of the property for
its particular uses;
• The requested zoning is consistent with the Growth Policy.
• The property is compatible with surrounding development which is, for the most part,
school to the west and low density to north and south of the property.
• The water and sewer infrastructure proposed with the annexation will have to meet
infrastructure requirements by the Public Works Department.
Finding:
The requested zoning is in keeping with the character of the development in the area.
5
Xl. Will the zoning conserve the value of buildings;
• The extension and availability of public water and sewer resultant from annexation and
initial zoning will add value to buildings as the proposed use is substantially like or
complementary to surrounding buildings and uses.
• The requested zoning is consistent with the Growth Policy.
• The proposed zoning is not anticipated that there would be any adverse effect on the value
of surrounding buildings or lands.
Finding:
The value of existing buildings both on and adjacent to the requested zone will either be
enhanced or not affected by the proposed zoning.
XII. Will the zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality?
• The requested zoning is consistent with the Growth Policy.
• The requested zoning is consistent with the prevailing land uses and zoning surrounding
the property.
Finding:
The requested zoning provides for the most appropriate use of land in the municipality as
the school district has owned the property for some time and the annexation of the property
into the City of Laurel will give the school district to plan for its future education needs.
Conclusion:
The petition for annexation into the City of Laurel with the initial zoning assignment of Laurel
"Public "appears to be consistent with the requirements of Part 46 Annexation and City Council
Resolution R-08-22. Additionally, the annexation, extension of services, and initial zoning
assignment are in the best interest of both the City of Laurel and the Laurel School District.
RECOMMENDATION
The Laurel — Yellowstone City County Planning Board recommend that the Laurel City Council adopt the
Findings of Fact outlined in this Recommendation and approve the Annexation and Initial Zoning
requested by the Laurel School District.
➢ That an Amended Plat or Certificate of Survey suitable for filing with Yellowstone County that
describes the tract of land to be Annexed is submitted by the School District.
➢ That an Annexation Agreement is submitted for acceptance by the City Council.
➢ That any extensions of water, sewer and storm facilities be approved by the Public Works
Department.
➢ That any recommendations from the traffic study be implemented and approved by the City
Council.
Cel
Recommendation for zoning assignment for the
annexation application by the Laurel School District
LAUREL - YELLOWSTONE CITY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
The Laurel- Yellowstone City - County Planning Board acting as the zoning
commission for the City of Laurel voted unanimously on March 201h, 2024, to
recommend the assignment for a zoning designation of "Public" (P) if the City
Council of Laurel annexes lands owned by the Laurel School District described
as a portion of Lots 1 Et 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision Second Filing which is
anticipated to be amended. The amended tract of record will be the Amended
Plat of Lots 1 Et 2 of Nutting Brothers Subdivision Second Filing in Section 10
Township 2 South Range 24 East. The Planning Board held a public hearing and
allowed for written and in person testimony for or against the action to
recommend the zoning designation. The planning board considered the written
or in person testimony at the public hearing and completed a review of zoning
considerations when assigning zoning designations. The Planning Board believes
that this assignment of zoning is consistent with the 2020 Laurel Growth
Management Policy. The Laurel Yellowstone City- County Planning Board Public
Hearing was publicly noticed for at least 15 days in a newspaper of general
circulation within Yellowstone County. All property owners within 300 feet of
the school district propose lands to be annexed were notified of the date of the
public hearing. The planning board moved, seconded, and voted unanimously
to recommend to the City Council to approve the zoning designation of
"Public" (P) if the City of Laurel completes the annexation.
Dated this 11th day of April 2024.
\61-•Laur !Ye(lowstone Cit County Planning Board
Juo Goldsby, Presiden, „
rt Mbrliegard, Egecutiv�? Secretary
MCLELLAND, LEONARD C LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PO BOX 164 410 COLORADO AVE
LAUREL, MT 59044-0164 LAUREL, MT 59044-2714
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT 7 GUTHRIDGE, PERRY
410 COLORADO AVE 2110 RIDGEVIEW DR
LAUREL, MT 59044-2714 BILLINGS, MT 59105-3635
MCLELLAND, LEONARD C DUPEA JR, PAUL & DEREKA
708 E MARYLAND LN 915 E 8TH ST
LAUREL, MT 59044-2165 LAUREL, MT 59044-2219
CITY OF LAUREL SCHEELER, LYNN R & JANALYN K
PO BOX 10 1011 ALDER AVE
LAUREL, MT 59044-0010 LAUREL, MT 59044-2252
STJOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES INC BRANDT, KENNETH RJR
3940 RIMROCK RD 901 E MARYLAND LN
BILLINGS, MT 59102-0141 LAUREL, MT 59044-2227
PENNY, ARTHUR W & CAROL P YELLOWSTONE COUNTY (PARKS)
1503 E RAILROAD ST PO BOX 35000
LAUREL, MT 59044-3341 BILLINGS, MT 59107-5000
PENNY, ARTHUR W & CAROL P
1503 E RAILROAD ST
LAUREL, MT 59044-3341
PENNY, ARTHUR W & CAROL P
1503 E RAILROAD ST
LAUREL, MT 59044-3341
PENNY, ARTHUR W & CAROL P
1503 E RAILROAD ST
LAUREL, MT 59044-3341
Map exhibit for the inclusion of East 81h Street for the Laurel School Annexation of a portion
of lots 1 & 2 Nutting Brothers Second Filing.
V A-C
-y 1 I r +� t
gel
Iry rF
77
ri
�.•,er t y li � = i G
1 T^c TT
East 8th street outlined in red to be annexed. Yellow is the proposed Lot 1 A of Amended Plat
a o s C c, r,-. o _-.a La,r.cc 0
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Laurel City Council will conduct a public hearing on April 23, 2024.
Public Hearing for the annexation into the City of Laurel and assignment of zoning "Public" for
a portion of the property described as Nutting Bros 2"d Filing -Lots 1 and 2 by the Laurel School
District and any adjacent public right of way. The property is located Northeast of the
intersection of East 8th Street and Alder Ave and is owned by the Laurel School District.
The hearing is scheduled for 6:30 P.M., in the Laurel City Council Chambers at City Hall, 115
West 1st Street, Laurel, Montana, on Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024.
Public comment is encouraged and can be provided in person at the public hearing on April 23,
2024. Public comments can also be made via email to the Planning Director, or via letter to the
Planning Department office at 115 West 1st Street Laurel, MT 59044. Copies of the
documentation are available for review upon request at the Planning Department office.
Questions regarding these public hearings may be directed to the Planning Director at 406-628-
4796 ext. 5305, or via email at cityplanner@laurel.mt.gov.
�C'Tr
LNR U'.E
�
:
I
I
t II--w�tiew�I¶a� irnnai �$y
9 ACRES) J
.I
L
z. I �rrr rrrr r8
t<S.'flM S7i�� �-
I —I —I
F—'—]
7-- —! L r.rrrrrrrrr�rrrrr�
i AM S
]0_.. • K
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Laurel -Yellowstone CitV-County Planning Board and Laurel's Zoning Commission will
conduct a public hearing on March 20, 2024.
Public Hearing for the annexation into the City of Laurel and assignment of zoning "Public" for
a portion of the property described as Nutting Bros 2"d Filing -Lots 1 and 2 bV the Laurel School
District and anV adjacent public right of waV• The propertV is located Northeast of the
intersection of East 8t" Street and Alder Ave and is owned bV the Laurel School District.
The hearing is scheduled for 6 P.M., in the Laurel City Council Chambers at CitV Hall, 115 West
1st Street, Laurel, Montana, on Wednesday, March 20t", 2024.
Public comment is encouraged and can be provided in person at the public hearing on March
20, 2024. Public comments can also be made via email to the Planning Director, or via letter to
the Planning Department office at 115 West 1st Street Laurel, MT 59044. Emails or letters of
comments should be received by 2pm MST March 14, 2024, so they can be transmitted to the
Planning Board members prior to the meeting. Copies of the documentation are available for
review upon request at the Planning Department office. Questions regarding these public
hearings may be directed to the Planning Director at 406-628-4796 ext. 5305, or via email at
cityplanner@laurel.mt.gov.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Laurel -Yellowstone City -County Planning Board and Laurel's Zoning Commission will
conduct a public hearing on March 20, 2024.
Public Hearing for the annexation into the CitV of Laurel and assignment of zoning "Public" for
a portion of the propertV described as Nutting Bros 2nd Filing -Lots 1 and 2 bV the Laurel School
District and anV adjacent public right of waV• The propertV is located Northeast of the
intersection of East 8th Street and Alder Ave and is owned by the Laurel School District.
The hearing is scheduled for 6 P.M., in the Laurel CitV Council Chambers at CitV Hall, 115 West
1st Street, Laurel, Montana, on WednesdaV, March 20th, 2024.
Public comment is encouraged and can be provided in person at the public hearing on March
20, 2024. Public comments can also be made via email to the Planning Director, or via letter to
the Planning Department office at 115 West 1st Street Laurel, MT 59044. Emails or letters of
comments should be received bV 2pm MST March 14, 2024, so theV can be transmitted to the
Planning Board members prior to the meeting. Copies of the documentation are available for
review upon request at the Planning Department office. Questions regarding these public
hearings may be directed to the Planning Director at 406-628-4796 ext. 5305, or via email at
cityplanner@laurel.mt.gov
_'E'_�CK S
I
I
= I
r
I
ANNE. A ON Pcnnct
BOUNOA�Y (APPROX.
/ 4.9 ACRES)
F. :c �alr.Te;�ct
�UTTNG U<001 -,
WTn4;. W0WLki;
G .'f"4901 SE:0.0 REND
a
;pAil:e. �m.) ni
s
i J
I �
i
I
�G'_'
::. M fib ♦
L'd5' BM ..:71t-=
Y
I f-- r-'
I 1--1 IJ —A
1301 P 1 HG11T iJ®o T-1100-22
70 r ZUPf ' T =
Ck t+ �Z 3-7 iCAttTTi,'J-' L , l0JNEZA7101-k! D]Lil(CN
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of Laurel to properly guide and monitor growth that
is in the best interests of the City and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the City Council to adopt an Annexation Policy that
governs proposed annexations to the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 008-02 § 16.12.020;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and accepted the attached Annexation Policy for
the City of Laurel,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel,
Montana,
The Council hereby adopts the City of Laurel Annexation Policy in its current form and
content. All resolutions adopting any other annexation policies that conflict or are inconsistent with
these policies are hereby repealed, voided and of no further effect.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be enforceable on the effective
date of Ordinance No. 008-02.
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 4, 2008, by Council Member
Hart.
2008. PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel this 4b day of March,
APPROVED by the Mayor this 4`h day of March, 2008.
CITY OF LAUREL
Kenneth E. Olson, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Mary K. Ftollet0n, Clerk -Treasurer
-- - Approved as to .
Sam Painter, Legal Counsel
Elk River Law Office, P.L.L.P.
R08-22 Annexation Policy
i=�,r 31-1,TLAUREL ANNEXATION POLICY
Ser i4me oubide ciay No water or sewer services shall be extended outside of the
incorporated city limits without meeting the following conditions:
A. The property and improvements are in the same condition as is required for properties and
inmpnovemants within the city's corporate limits;
B. The city system is capable of serving the area;
C. The extension is in the best interest of the city,
D. The cost of the extension shall be at the expense of the requesting party,
E. The city council has granted its approval. (Prior code § 18.76.010(A)); and
F. The property is annexed.
Convent fa Annexation nadVauWoli ver ou ?Rratest.
A. Any property owner requesting or receiving city water or sewer service outside ofthe incorporated city
Emits shall, as a condition of initiating or continuing city services, consent to annexation ofthe property
beneficially receiving services. The consent to annexation may be limited to the property that will
benefit or is benefiting from the provision of city services.
B. Vilhenever annexation is sought pursuant to a petition submitted to the city by a property owner
requesting annexation, the property owner shall execute a written waiver ofprotest in a form approved
by city staff for purposes of recording. The waiver of protest constitutes a covenant that will run with
the land to be annexed and shall waive all right of protest and judicial review to the creation of any
future special improvement district. (Prior code § 18.76.010(B))
Annexation Fee.
Property owner shall pay the city's applicable annexation fee prior to the city's consideration ofthe annexation
request.
Annexation Criteria and Requirements.
A. The City Council shall consider the following criteria when it receives a written petition fior annexation:
• The property must be located within an area identified by city staff as a location for future city
annexation or annexation of the property will promote orderly growth of the city to protect the
health, safety and welfare in areas intensely utilized for residential, commercial, institutional and
governmental purposes;
The city must be able to provide adequate city services within a time period mutually agreed to by
the property owner requesting annexation and the city;
• Existing or proposed public improvements within the area to be annexed must meet all city
standards. If the public improvements are not constructed at the time of annexation, the property
owner shall provide the city a bond or letter of credit that equals 125% ofthe estimated engineering
costs for the construdion of improvements. If the property owner fails to construct the
improvements or to obtain the agreed upon engineering, the city shall utilize the bond or letter of
City of Laurel Annexation Policy
credit to pay for the construction, including engineering; In accordance with GASB-34, the
Developer or Landowner shall provide the city the total cost and/or value of the improvements
including, but not limited to, parks, sidewalks, curb and gutter, lift stations, and sewer and water
lines, that are conveyed to the city.
All Property owners within the area to be annexed must sign a Waiver of Right to Protest the
creation of Special Improvement Districts for engineering and construction of improvements
including, but not limited to, streets, sidewalks, curb and gutter and the creation of a Park
Maintenance District, in a form acceptable and approved by the city;
® All residential property owners must execute a Waiver of Right -to -Protest the creation of Special
Improvement Districts for engineering and construction of improvements including, but not limited
to, streets, sidewalks, curb and gutter and the creation of a Park Maintenance District, in a form
acceptable and approved by the city;
o Residential densities within the area to be annexed must be rezoned at a minimum density of R-
7500 or greater, and
The proposed land use within the area to be annexed must conform to the goals of the Laurel -
Yellowstone City -County Planning Board Growth Policy.
B. The City Council may decide to either condition the approval of the annexation in order to meet the
criteria listed in Section A herein or require an annexation agreement. The conditions of approval must
be clearly stated in the resolution of annexation or if required, the annexation agreement. If the
property to be annexed is not developed, the conditions of approval or annexation agreement shall
include a requirement for.
1. A development agreement prior to the issuance of a building permit;
2. A subdivision improvements agreement at the time of final subdivision plat approval, if
applicable and
3. An executed Waiver of Right -to -Protest creation of Special Improvement Districts for
engineering and construction ofimprovements including, but not limited to, streets, sidewalks,
curb and gutter and the creation of a Park Maintenance District, in a form acceptable and
approved by the city.
If the property is developed and contains public improvements that are not constructed to city standards, the
city shall require an annexation agreement. The annexation agreement shall specify that the public
improvements must be upgraded and/or installed to city standards, as well as a time period and mechanism to
finance the construction and installation of those improvements. All construction or installation of
improvements must be completed within two years of annexation.
In any case, all public improvements, whether existing or proposed, small r>aeet ctty standards.
City of Laurel An=xa ion Policy
CITY OF LAUREL9 MONTANA
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION
AND PLAN OF ANNEXATION
Aixi)ltcnnit is -eauh-ed t0 th-1 City phinn-11' priol- to {ill?112 Out this
m)lizatioaa. All blanks of this application are to be filled in with explanation
by the applicant. Incomplete applications will not be accepted.
Only parcels of land adjacent to the City of Laurel municipal limits will be considered for
annexation. "Adjacent to" also includes being across a public right of way. If the parcel
to be annexed is smaller than one city block in size (2.06 acres), the city council must
approve consideration of the request; the applicant must make a separate written request
to the city council stating their wish to annex a parcel of land less than one city block in.
Once the council approves the request, the applicant can apply for annexation.
2. Applicant landowner's name: Laurel Public Schools
Address: 410 Colorado Ave., Laurel, MT 59044
Phone: 406.628.3360
Parcel to be annexed: (If it is not surveyed or of public record, it must be of public record
PRIOR to applying for annexation.)
Legal description: Lot 1A of the Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2 Nutting Brothers Subdivision, 2nd Filing
Lot size: 4.886 acres
Present use: Grass sports fields
Planned use: Public Elementary School
Present zoning: R200 - Residential Tracts
(Land which is being annexed automatically becomes zoned R-7500 when it is
officially annexed [City ordinance 17.12.220])
4. City services: The extension of needed city services shall be at the cost of the applicant
after annexation by the city has been approved. As part of the application process, each
of the following city services must be addressed with an explanation:
Water Service:
Location of existing main: ex. main along frontage of E. 8th St. & the south 50' of AIth
Cost of extension of approved service: $250,000.00
How cost determined: Engineer's Opinion of Cost
Timeframe for installation: Summer 2024
Sewer Service:
Location of existing main: Alder Ave.
Cost of extension of approved service: $0.00
How cost determined: Main currently exists
Timeframe for installation: Installed
How financed: n/a
Streets:
Is there any adjoining County ROW to the proposed
annexation: Yes, Alder Ave. and E. 8th St.
Location of existing paved access: Alder Ave. and E. 8th St.
Cost of paving: n/a
How cost determined: n/a
Timeframe for construction: n/a
Other required improvements: Provide above information on attached
pages.
5. A map suitable for review of this application of the proposed area to be annexed must be
submitted with this application.
6. A written Waive of Protest must accompany this application, suitable for recording and
containing a covenant to run with the land to be annexed, waiving all right of protest to
the creation by the city of any needed improvement district for construction or
maintenance of municipal services. This Waiver of Protest must be signed by the
applicant prior to annexation by the city.
7. Requests for annexations are referred to the City -County Planning Board for
recommendation to the City Council. Within 30 days after receiving the properly filled
out application with all required accompaniments and after conducting a duly advertised
public hearing, the City -County Planning Board shall make recommendation to the City
Council as to this Request for Annexation. If more information is needed from the
applicant during the review of the application, such application shall be deemed
incomplete and the timeframe for reporting to the City Council extended accordingly, in
needed.
8. A non-refundable application fee of $300 + $25.00 per acre (80 acres or less); $300 +
$35.00 per acres (81 acres or more) must accompany the submission of this application.
The City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, after review and consideration of this
Application for Annexation, found such to be in the best interest of the City, that it
complied with state code, and approved this request at its City Council meeting of
Form revised by City Attomey April 2008
AFFIDAVIT OF WAIVER OF PROTEST
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LAUREL, MONTANA
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND CREATION OF
ANY FUTURE SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
The undersigned hereby waives protest to the annexation of the property described beloNv by the
City of Laurel. Undersigned also waives their right to seek judicial review under M.C.A.
§ 7-2-4741 (2007), subsequent to the City's annexation of the below described property.
The undersigned hereby additionally waives protest to the creation of future Special Improvement
District(s) created and/or formed for future street improvements including, but not limited to, paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage or any other lawful purpose.
This Affidavit is submitted pursuant to and as a part of the Annexation Agreement and future
contemplated Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City of Laurel.
This Affidavit of Waiver shall run with the land and shall forever be binding upon the Grantee, their
transferees, successors and assigns.
LEGAL (DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY:
64 99
DATED this day of 720
Grantee Name
(Company..)
STATE OF )
) ss.
County of )
On this _ day of , 20 , personally appeared before me,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged the he/she/they executed
the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal on the day
and year in this certificate first above written.
(SEAL)
Notary Public for the State of
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:_
1
ORDINANCE NO.008-02
ORDINANCE ADOPTING ANNEXATION REGULATIONS FOR
THE CITY OF LAUREL FOR INCORPORATION IN CELAPTER 16
OF THE LAUREL MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 007-01 adopted April 3, 2007 repealed Chapter 16 ofthe Laurel
Municipal Code in its entirety in order to comply with changes adopted by the State of Montana
Legislature; and
WHEREAS, the repealed Chapter 16 of the Laurel Municipal Code provided for annexation
regulations while the newly adopted Chapter 16 of the Laurel Municipal Code did not contain specific
annexation procedures; and
WHEREAS, annexation regulations are necessary for the City of Laurel to properly guide and
monitor growth that is in the best interest of the City and its citizens;
IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, that the
following chapter is hereby adopted into the LAUREL MUNICIPAL CODE as set forth below.
Chanter 16.12
ANNEXATIONS
Sections:
16.12.010 Annexation.
16.12.020 Annexation Policy.
16.12.030 Annexation Fee Schedule
16.12.010 Annexation.
The City may annex property in accordance with the methods and procedures prescnbed
in MCA Title 7 Chapter 2 Parts 42 43 44 45 46 or 47 as amended
16.12.020 Annexation Policy.
The City Council shall adopt rules and regulations that govern proposed annexations to
the City by Council Resolution
16.12.030 Annexation Fee Schedule
The City Council shall adopt an annexation fee schedule by annual Resolution after a
public hearing in accordance with Section 2 72 060 (Ord 06 04 (part) 2006• prior code
18.76.010(D)l
This Ordinance becomes effective thirty (30) days after final passage by the City Council and
approval by the Mayor.
008-02 Ordinance Amending Subdivision Regulations - Annexations
SANDE RSON (ft,
STEWART
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Overview
a sanderson bellecci company
The Laurel Public School District is requesting annexation of approximately 4.9 acres into the
City of Laurel, Montana as shown on the attached Exhibit A. The school district property
looking to be annexed is located just outside the northeast boundary of the Laurel city limits,
along the east side of Alder Avenue in Yellowstone County, Montana. Additional annexed
properties are located further east of the island in which the proposed annexation tract is
located. A boundary line relocation plat is proposed to run concurrently with the annexation
petition to create the annexation parcel. The property is legally described as: approximately
the south 628 feet of Lots I and 2, Nutting Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing and
the proposed legal description of. Lot I A, Amended Plat of Lots I & 2 of Nutting
Brothers Subdivision, Second Filing.
The property lies adjacent to Alder Avenue that defines the eastern -most boundary of Laurel's
city limits, and within the boundary of the City of Laurel's Annexation Priority Area that is
defined in Laurel's 2020 Growth Policy. The property is currently zoned as R200 - Residential
Tracts within Laurel's zoning jurisdiction and is proposed to change to Public when annexation
occurs.
Utility Extensions
Upon annexation of the property, City of Laurel public water and sanitary sewer services will
be extended to the proposed elementary school building. The intent is that a new public water
main will be extended from the existing 12-inch dead end water main in Alder Avenue north
approximately 850 feet and tie into the existing 8-inch water main at the East Maryland Lane
which will complete the water main loop. From the new main, new service lines will be
extended on the property to the building for domestic water and fire suppression. Extension of
a new 12-inch storm drain main will be constructed in East 8th Street from Cottonwood
Avenue to the property. The new public water and storm drain mains will become part of the
City of Laurel system and will be located within public rights -of -way.
Planning and Designing Enduring Communities Across the West
J m
Q �
U
� m
J J W W N
Q < �- Q 20 Q Q O�
Z Z Z O W Z Z O�
W LLJ C] O W W W W M r'
Q 2 U O_ H� -J O O O O S O
z N� WHO 00 mm fnO En WLO
W W W_ 00 x O W O W�
� CL' I- � J � U U x m (Y- t0 Qf I-
Ld L' S
J z
z
z
o
O
O N
NO Q / * v4v ONnLd ON003s 'NotswaGns ^ g Nm _ ^
iy Z / ■*+ s83Nt0aa mum N
} O/ 3nN31 V 31VO N Z n
Q
NOOIe o
Of 0 I , z NOOI8 m a
zTn.mmrm ^_ �n."mnmm^ ^�TIZt z
LL_ m
NOOIe n
n , W L NJOIe I � � n
N N
NOs iasfs NVOOYI' n —ry — NOIsN10eRs NVOON a— N 9 NOOia _
31WCLMNOJ IOO
wa g� 77—MUIZ*7le E�E
Ian F� I le n<m'mle m
€�
z >- my 1 _
<<tx U
J W Z < ` — Iti zz of
m zQ
In
L _a z x3ole a— "
317N74 WOY167 ;
I NOoie
cz z —] m--- ®Lmm�--
a
Rum F5
7 _ I — m—
z I z m m n V �_Hamnm
II I . = t NOOlB a nola
ni -
3nN3i1 V U307V
--TITIT�
I. —
ad
J
O
O
U
V)
U
J
m
D
J
W
Of
D
Cr
O0 m
0 0 m
CC af m 4
d- o-
z
W W
of of
d E
Im
I mo,
U
I! m tC NO l
ITS T
I m "ITI�T
�ILITE
3nvzi1 V o//Vol
ITF
mlTl T LE
C 1WYd N06N OARS Man NtlVd
NOL9N/HSVM
FI T IT{ -FT 11, T ITI T I�TJ,eT ITI T 171 T 11 ^
LI T IJ TITS°�� M��E-IT I ]] w [r
11 T ITI TT It k, U ITI T FI aTd I1 n
m
AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2 OF
NUTTING BROTHERS SUBDIVISION, SECOND RLP c0
SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 10, T. 2 S., R. 24 E., P.M.M.,
YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA
PREPARED FOR LAUREL PUBLIC SCHOOLS FEBRUARY, 2024
PREPARED BY : SANDERSON STEWART d8b BILLINGS, MONTANA
NON HORW SrA nav 5T/d I
j�
I
I
ryrcyy
PLYNr SUn HSRAV
kl
mrr „'�
ea Lar
tD
2—
LaTn
vAAr
9 EAST " ` '1
: mdn, a
MARYLAND —
LANE
Yr
esae
9
-�qrzw
wLD
' —.
rv.eK
,
zta
1RACr NI -AI
F
LOT TA
g11O5 s
21 ]i AC
P
F
II
I
b NUT7/NC
CQS 2-W
m I
B I s evrrx y .vaTr
W
QI �j
1NACr 9!-AI
16 T
CC 2JM5 AM. I Z u t of u
n LOT 1A
R 2t 111i5 4
Ac
Q 1=
el >Fw
rNAGr -A I I I? r
CO.S 2J85
I
1
EIGHTH
Lar t2
�
for
4�
NUTPNN��
�tNENsI
7—
ldl�
0
NOM
>D LID
BASIS Z BEARING`. ttc
N�ql A�—A
• m dyr z lr lu.. Val rip Pno®1.1x nc tine l.•rw
« pc I.oxaoa G90 naY.1m •w t9mvA1 sRVRr
CERTIFICATE OF RIVERSTONE HEALTH
Mb ffi le s,my noa Oam nHo.W and
.pp —Id by
ey Rtw,lm. NwIM.
HadM Olh« « A tb— Rmreamtallw
YNlanlme Oly=,ky tl— DIP--
.. Rirr.lm. HtlM
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SGIE
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR
Hk0)NEAS
STATE (% YIXITANA )
County of Y—.tme )
Me undrNq�e4 a — -- -- b Me Stole of uanima •tale Not
drbq M. mmM a( S.p--. 2021 a —y.m p—. u bb •ry —
I o —1 of Imd Nt.— b Me NYO/A of Smtbn 10. T. 2 S. R ]t C. b Me
GNttY of lauW. YNlonlma County. bN^9 man partkul«IY tl.cLW a• Idlwa la
Lots 1 and 2 0l Nu,lln9 RraM«a SubdlNNm. Sword FMn IIIb-9 to M,
LOI J
Nlhid plat m .. M My ollbe of we tivk and retard« al --b.. —1,
ml«a u Oowmml NI. 121371 na.N9 m . of MM oc.,.
Mol M. manammla faand and nl «e o1 the Moot« and Ia y Me
., «d M, plat b«eol Nw• hu, wd a«nat
Paatbn. Nam bran, Nat mwcanlerma el
tlYnmNma and awt M. Dlot M M. next m M. «mn4
SAxDOtSDN Sit MT
SUBn/NAAV
BY
Ymtma Ucmm xp.
Dal•
PURPOSE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY LINE RELOCATION
1, ly. to
MDM. W�c.nl P«wnD.rlb .IM•I
rwbNewbb«d9 aMMai m.drywII«a1.lW
.dra
otaIM
n=n (—1 Wand m l-
b-, bnln M1.rrb.Gv"'
1NU rIUNC
w16 -o
m pwmto -}2)(I wpl sto ARY
f
24-1101(txl)(i)C), tt,I Mla g I. r zIf
almm« ibaoIb,u.n
NN.bd
-d J.W .IM «.1 , - I-1 1 wofwsaDW
nbI 1. 1. 1 nimmca legal daa«Iplbn b my aibmaaml
inna
. plat
nd prvpMy 4wal« ottr Me bllW irmafr onocwlW ndM M. la nwa.
. ww «w 1• aswb.d. wd.w ww arm b btlutlW NM «
hen Wpinbq 4«t. If reror4
lnt lA 1)., to nW. by M. O.p«Anml al
E..haenmla Outlily pvrmml to )D-♦-125(Q Y.CA, a
mbdlN.M n-- fmm Me pnAabn. al cbmtr J must b.
t f I I
m-It- I« retie. a««Ca9 to Ind PmA.wb• 01 Mb Port.
n 1 Mot Me wl—g dhbbna I, P«da Me
Y ,
nduaima «• w•d b vwdv M• pnrlNm. el Mb P«L «s net
[or •
p 5
1p�
mbpet la r..b'
(d) w c«IIMd purmml to ip-•-12):
I
(dHM)alwan. « p«oe1. el was Mat «. nerilpllan npm
— (+ e,°.wu • ins AAA
e Corm $ubdirbb). «X Fwllb9 Aut n.1n Intl«
)}}20)DJ(a). (I)(0). (Ixd). (l)(I)
lnI 7A b s.«mt Fain rN•. p« arm li.]p.6a5(txa). No
,
I«man rsauYn9 ml•r aNNY• .t• .ar dbpw0. «.aid
.nl. mwoay mar e. em,weW m Mb p«aN.
1
STREET
SAIL--oI �'
FLOT,-,
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mb daolmmt bw boor —W by M. Cb-ty
Att..;. anw and 1. ocwpt— w to wino
oat:
R,N..W by
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER
I nstlY a«lily Mal dl red Drm.rtY Iwn andId
wb now b.m Paw P« )9-1-611 1)(b)rrym
Oalc
YAvnlms Cwnly Trsomr«
N1
Dwab
lAUR6 F1LL�^ARYT YSOIDOLI2/S ol7-7D.
R,
nua
STALE OF YIXITANA )
o1 YNlonlow )p
dr MI. _day el
mtlralTW Moldy hblk f« M, Slal..1 Yml•a, Dra«laly
W.n bwm w me la be Ube
wn o N9nW M. Mpm b9 Mtrumnl w
a1 IAIIREL EIFNENTARY SCHOOL OISII9CT )-M, and
mM IWgW me Mot Uay navlW an .una :4TL.r
y nine me m M M. day «rd y,« n«.b man Mltn
-- hbh I« Me SIGN al Ymlma
—R. .1.
..1. SCHOOL OISTXICT ),
cmnly, Ymtane (,ry INrtREsr)
R,
STATE Q —TANA )
County o1 Y.,o..lan )
On MI. _der o1 . 20_, bl— ma Me
wd.rNq�W Notary haw I« Me I.
a, Ymlaw. Perwnoll
mpwW tno.n to m. to ba W
pawn .np tlPl W M. b. SOU( w.-- w
1 UUREL IDGTI 50100E MSiMCT i, wtl .no
n noi1W9atl to m. ,not M.Y nealW M..�-It N1h�md my
and na M. aay «d y.« n..b aea...dn..
Nolvey Puelb 1« Me S,al. of Ymlma
J
SANDERSONtv*'j'
STEWART
a sanderson belleccl company
Date: February 22, 2024
Project No.: 23103
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost
for
Mogan Elementary School
Alder Ave. Water Main Improvements
Schedule I: Utilities
Item No.
Quantity Unit
Description Unit Price
Subtotal
101
1 L.S.
Mobilization and Insurance $18,143.42
= $18,143.42
102
1 L.S.
Payment and Performance Bonds $6,403.56
= $6,403.56
103
1 L.S.
Traffic Control $6,000.00
= $6,000.00
104
1 L.S.
Dewatering $45,000.00 =
$45,000.00
Alder Ave.
105
379 C.Y.
Type II Bedding $40.00 =
$15,160.00
106
2 E.A.
Bentonite Trench Plug $1,500.00 =
$3,000.00
107
1 E.A.
12-inch Gate Valve $6,000.00 =
$6,000.00
108
851 L.F.
12-inch Water Main $95.00 =
$80,845.00
109
2 E.A.
12-inch Bend $1,200.00 =
$2,400.00
110
2 E.A.
12X 12X6 Hydrant Tee $1,250.00 =
$2,500.00
1 1 1
2 E.A.
Fire Hydrant and Assembly $7,500.00 =
$15,000.00
112
2 E.A.
4-inch Water Service $5,500.00 =
$1 1,000.00
113
1 E.A.
I -inch Water Service $2,000.00 =
$2,000.00
Schedule I Subtotal =
$213,451.98
Construction Subtotal =
$213,451.98
Construction Subtotal Plus Contingency =
$245,469.77
Administrative Fees
Geotechnical Services and Materials Testing 1.25% =
$3,068.37
Subtotal of Administrative Fees =
$3,068.37
Construction Total and Administrative Fees =
$248,538.15
Notes:
Costs based on Sanderson Stewart offsite sketch
Mobilization and Insurance based on percentage of total schedule cost 8.5
Construction contingency 15
All items are complete and in place.
Sanderson Stewart cannot warrant that any opinions of probable cost provided by Sanderson Stewart will not vary from actual costs incurred
by the client Sanderson Stewart has no control over the cost or availability of labor, equipment, materials, or over market conditions or the
Contractor's method of pricing. Sanderson Stewart makes no warranty, express or implied, that the bids or the negotiated cost of the work
will not vary from Sanderson Stewart's opinion of probable cost
Page 1 of 1
Placemaking
Infrastructure
Engineering
Surveying +
Mapping
Community
Planning
Landscape
Architecture
—Branding +
Visualization
1�(�-J'H
23103
Adam Baumgartner, AIA
A&E Design
124 North 29th Street, Suite 100
Billings, MT 59101
49
Pl~
October 2023
SANDE RSON
STEWART
ENDURING COMMUNITY DESIGN
SANDERSONSTEWART��
a Sanderson bellecd cor,ipany
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................1
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................1
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.......................................................................................................................1
EXISTING CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................1
Streets..............................................................................................................................................1
Intersections......................................................................................................................................1
Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities................................................................................................................5
TrafficVolumes..................................................................................................................................5
IntersectionCapacity......................................................................................................................... 5
CrashHistory .................................................................................................................................... 5
TRIPGENERATION.................................................................................................................................. 8
TRIPDISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................................................9
TRAFFICASSIGNMENT............................................................................................................................9
TRAFFICIMPACTS...................................................................................................................................9
TrafficVolumes.................................................................................................................................. 9
IntersectionCapacity.........................................................................................................................9
MitigationAlternatives..................................................................................................................... 12
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................13
Conclusions....................................................................................................................................13
Recommendations...........................................................................................................................14
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A —TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
APPENDIX B — CAPACITY CALCULATIONS — EXISTING CONDITIONS (2023)
APPENDIX C — CAPACITY CALCULATIONS — FUTURE (2025)
APPENDIX D — AUXILIARY TURN LANE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: CRASH HISTORY — FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY STATISTICS....................................................... 7
TABLE 2: CRASH HISTORY — COLLISION TYPE.......................................................................................... 7
TABLE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY...................................................................................................8
Mogan Elementary School TIS 0
SANDERSONSTEWARTIft
U sunderson beOeccl co(Tli uny z-
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE1: STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 2
FIGURE2: SITE LAYOUT..........................................................................................................................3
FIGURE 3: STREET & INTERSECTION CHARACTERISTICS........................................................................... 4
FIGURE 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS (2023) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .............................................. 6
FIGURE 5: TRIP DISTRIBUTION & TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT SUMMARY....................................................... 10
FIGURE 6: FUTURE (2025) TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS................................................................................. 11
Mogan Elementary School TIS Eil
SANDERSONSTEWARTj�
a sdncie,son beHecd company ��
INTRODUCTION
This traffic impact study (TIS) assesses the traffic -related impacts associated with the proposed Mogan Elementary
School located on Alder Avenue in Laurel, Montana on the surrounding transportation system. This report also
provides recommendations to mitigate any such impacts. The methodology and analysis procedures used in this study
employ the latest technology and nationally accepted standards in the areas of site development and transportation
impact assessment. Recommendations made in this report are based on professional judgment and these principles.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed Mogan Elementary School is located on the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Alder Avenue
and East 8th Street in Laurel, Montana. The site is bordered by sports fields and East Maryland Lane to the north, a
vacant lot to the east with residences in the southern area, East 8th Street to the south, and Alder Avenue to the
west. Figure I on the following page depicts the study area.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The site development plan proposes construction of a 72,000 square -foot elementary school for 3rd through 5th
grades with a total enrollment capacity of 588 students. Site access for visitors and buses is proposed via two one-
way movement approaches on the west side of the site from Alder Avenue. Site access for parent drop-off, staff, and
deliveries is proposed via two one-way approaches into the parking lot on the south from East 8th Street. The
eastern access on East 8th Street is currently proposed to be entrance -only and the western access would be exit -
only. Figure 2 on the page three illustrates the current proposed site layout and lot configuration.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Streets
Figure 3 on page four shows the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) functional street classifications and
speed limits on the study area streets. Alder Avenue has curb and gutter south of East 7th Street but not in the
project area. East Maryland Lane does not have curb and gutter. East 6th Street has curb and gutter, and East Main
Street has curb and gutter just along the north side of the road. There is a center two-way left -turn lane (TWLTL) on
East Main Street, which has a five (5) lane section west of Alder Avenue and a three (3) lane section east of Alder
Avenue. There are no turn lanes near the proposed school.
Intersections
Figure 3 also shows the traffic control utilized at each study area intersection. All intersections are stop -controlled or
uncontrolled and no intersections in the study area have dedicated turn lanes.
Mogan Elementary School TIS E
SANDERSONSTEWART��
a sanderson bellecei company +•
'A_ Ii I i +IF �y idl
Figure 1: Study Area
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDERSONSTEWART;�
_ .error. be'lecci cO,,Dor% '"Ilb�
YAJ
!f
• ri C Wit_ _ .;I ' °
�W f�
L-F
w' RY �' ~
FARENTDROP-OFF w,
II.,. i
I STAFF I EVENT PARKNG f
84 TOTAL SPACES
Figure 2: Site Layout
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDE RSO N STEWART
a suriue�sun bellecd Conip,iv
N
Figure 3: Street & Intersection Characteristics
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDERSONSTEWART��
a sanderson bellecd companv ��
Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities
There is sidewalk along Alder Avenue from East Main Street to East 6th Street. There is sidewalk on the north and
south sides of East 6th Street and along the north side of East Main Street. There are no other bicycle or pedestrian
facilities on study area streets.
Traffic Volumes
Weekday AM, After School, and PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected at study intersections on
Wednesday, September 20, 2023. The traffic data was collected using Miovision Scout video -based systems. The
weekday AM, After School, and PM peak hour periods were found to occur from 7:30 to 8:30 AM, 2:30 to 3:30 PM,
and 5:00 to 6:00 PM. Raw count data was adjusted for seasonal variation using MDT seasonal adjustment factors.
Figure 4 on page six summarizes the calculated Existing Conditions (2023) peak hour turning movement volumes for
the AM, After School, and PM peak hours. Detailed traffic count data worksheets are included in Appendix A.
Intersection Capacity
Intersection capacity calculations for Existing Conditions (2023) were performed for the study area intersections
using PTV Vistro 2023 software, which is based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition (Transportation
Research Board, 2022). Level of service (LOS) is defined as a quality measure describing operational conditions within
a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic
interruptions, comfort, and convenience. LOS is a qualitative measure of the performance of an intersection with
values ranging from LOS A, indicating good operation and low vehicle delays, to LOS F, which indicates congestion
and longer vehicle delays. LOS C is generally considered as the minimum acceptable performance level for planning
and design purposes.
The results of the Existing Conditions (2023) intersection capacity calculations showed all study area intersections
and approaches operate at LOS B or better during the AM, After School, and PM peak hours with minimal 95th
percentile queueing. The East 8th Street/Alder Avenue intersection was assumed to operate with westbound stop -
control, although there is not currently a stop sign present at this intersection. Figure 4 also shows the Existing
Conditions (2023) LOS results at each intersection. A detailed capacity summary table and capacity calculation
worksheets for each of the study area intersections can be found in Appendix B.
Crash History
Historical crash data was obtained from MDT for the five-year period from January I, 2017, through December 3 I,
2021, for the study area intersections. The data was analyzed for the purposes of calculating intersection crash and
severity rates and evaluating collision type trends. Tables I and 2 on page seven illustrate the results of that analysis.
Intersection crash rates were calculated on the standard basis of crashes per million vehicles entering (MVE) for each
intersection. The MVE metric was estimated based on 2023 peak hour traffic counts and published historical ADT
volumes from the MDT website. Crash rates for the study area intersections ranged from 0.00 crashes.'MVE to 1.43
crashes/MVE. The highest rate of 1.43 crashes/MVE occurred at the intersection of E Maryland Lane/Alder Avenue.
Mogan Elementary School TIS
F
KEY
XX — AM Peak Hour
[XX] — After School Peak Hour
(XX) — PM Peak Hour
LOS A [A1 (A) — LOS Alto [After School] (PM)
v
Figure 4: Existing Conditions (2023) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDERSONSTEWARTIf
t SU n;ler3on LellecCC i ornpanY
LOS B [B] (A)
1
(7) (11) (0)
[121 [111 101
18 16 2
)
I �
(6) [1418
—%� �—
3 [11 (1)
(34) [771 59
A LOS �—
83 129] (48)
(19)[20] 38
12 [4](4)
LOS
1
LOS
A (A] (A)
A [Al (A)
30 6 10
(261 [141 [t11
(45) (24) (17)
LOS 6 [e] (B)
LOS A (A) (A)
2
(17) (8)
[291 181
62 13
1�
15 [10) (13)
LOS
A [A1(A)�
16 [9] (14)
1
LOS
A (A) (A)
30 14
1381 1241
(52) (10)
LOS A (A) (A)
LOS A [Al (A)
3
(4) (23) (3)
1211381 [31
2 62 3
12
I I
(5) [61 7
!,
--IV,—
4 [41 (4)
(12) 1718
— M. LOS
12 [71 (7)
(3) (415
—,,k A [A) (A),O(—
413] (6)
LOS
LOS
A [A) (A)
A (A) (A)
19 32 2
[21 [521 13]
(8)(57)(8)
LOS A [A] (A)
Los B [B] (B)
4
13
1191 124)
39 25
(30) [16] 14
19 141 (31)
(267) [2001 208
—► LOS �4— 216
(1941 (335)
A [A] (A)
LOS LOS
A [A] (A) A [Al (A)
1
SANDERSONSTEWART jZ
a sanderson bellecd company +�
Table 1: Crash History - Freauencv and Severitv Statistics
Crash Type
Crash Data
HSM Predictione
Average
Crash
Predicted
2017-2021
Reported
Predicted
Intersection
DEV'
Crashes2
PDO
Injury
Fatality
Crash
Rate
Severity
Average Crash
Crash Rate
Frequency
(Crash/
Index
Frequency
(Crash/MVE)
(Crash/Yr)
MVE)
(Crash/Yr)
E Maryland Ln/Alder Ave
1273
2
2
0
0
0.40
0.86
0.00
0.39
0.84
E 8th St/Alder Ave
753
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.15
E 6th St/Alder Ave
1058
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.31
E Main St/Alder Ave
5716
1
0
1
0
0.20
0.10
1 3.00
1 0.40
0.19
1 Daily Entering Volume (DEV) estimated from 2023 peak hour counts
2 Crashes reported from January I, 2017 to December 3 I, 2021
3 Crash rates expressed as crashes per million vehicles entering (MVE)
° Rates calculated using Highway Safety Manual (HSM) I st Edition predictive methodology
As a means of evaluating the historical crash frequency rates, Sanderson Stewart calculated expected rates using the
predictive crash rate formulas in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Highway Safety Manual (HSM). The process involves calculating the number of crashes predicted in a year based on
traffic demand (AADTs) and various physical and traffic environment -based conditions, such as lane configurations
and traffic control. Sanderson Stewart then back calculated a frequency rate on the basis of one million vehicles
entering for the sake of comparison with the actual historical crash rate. The results of the calculations show that the
predicted crash rates are greater than or equal to the historical crash rates at all study area intersections. The HSM
rate predictions and five-year crash totals for each intersection are summarized in Table I above.
Severity indexes were also calculated for the study area intersections. The severity index gives an indication of
relative crash severity for a location based on the number of fatal, injury, and property damage only (PDO) crashes.
The highest severity index was 3.00 at the intersection of East Main Street/Alder Avenue, which is elevated due to
the only crash occurring resulting in an injury. Severity index calculation results are also summarized in Table I.
Sanderson Stewart also performed an analysis of collision classification to determine if any patterns could be
identified. There were no collision trends noted at study area intersections. Table 2 below presents the results of
that analysis.
Table 2: Crash History - Collision Type
Collision T pe
Right Angle
Left Turn,
Opposite Direction
Fixed Object
Total
E Maryland Ln/Alder Ave
1
1
2
E 8th St/Alder Ave
0
E 6th St/Alder Ave
0
E Main St/Alder Ave
I
I
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDERSONSTEWART��
u i:]a is fifSUf, uodl,'CCI ,:Drtl Puny �-
TRIP GENERATION
This study utilized Trip Generation, I I th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), which
is the most widely accepted source in the United States for determining trip generation projections. These
projections are used to analyze the impacts of a new development on the surrounding area. For the purposes of this
study, Land Use Code 520 — Elementary School was used to estimate trip generation for the proposed Mogan
School. Table 3 below illustrates the results of the trip generation calculations for the site.
At full occupancy of 588 students, the school is projected to generate a total of 1,335 gross average weekday trips
with 435 trips (235 entering/200 exiting) generated during the AM peak hour and 94 trips (43 entering/51 exiting)
generated during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. During the after school peak hour, the site is projected to
generate 265 trips (122 entering/143 exiting).
Trip generation projections provide an estimate of the total number of trips that would be generated by a proposed
development. However, to estimate the net number of new trips made by personal vehicles external to the site,
adjustments must often be made to account for internal capture trips, pass -by trips, and trips made by alternate
modes.
Internal capture (IC) trips are trips that do not have origins or destinations external to a project site and therefore
do not have an impact on external traffic operations. IC trips most often occur in mixed -use developments where
residential, commercial, and office -related land uses exhibit a high rate of internal trip exchange. It is likely that some
form of internal capture would occur between the new Mogan Elementary School and the existing Laurel Middle
School across Alder Avenue due to families with children at both schools. However, the main drop-off location and
access for the middle school is on the west side of that school facing Washington Avenue, so most trips to both
schools will likely still be made via the external street network.
Pass -by trips are trips that are made as intermediate stops on the way from a point of origin to a primary trip
destination. Pass -by trips are attracted from traffic "passing by" on an adjacent street that offers direct access to the
site. Pass -by trips are primarily attracted by commercial type land uses such as restaurants, convenience markets, and
gas stations and were therefore not calculated for Mogan Elementary School.
Trips made by alternate modes (walking, biking, transit) are generally common at schools. However, there is limited
sidewalk and other multi -modal facilities along Alder Avenue and other area streets accessing the site. Some multi -
modal facilities are anticipated to be installed adjacent to the new school but would not reach beyond the boundary
of the school. It is also assumed that the ITE rates include some level of multi -modal trips since the data was
collected at existing schools, so any further reduction was not included to be conservative.
Table 3: Trip Generation Summary
Land Use
Independent Variable
Average Weekday
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
After School Peak
Intensity
Units
total
enter
exit
total
enter
exit
total
enter
exit
total
enter
exit
Mogan School
588
Students
1335
668
667
435
235
200
94
43
51
265
1 122
1 143
To6a
NewTrips
1335
668
FT66-7-1
435
235
200
94
43
51
265
1 122
1 143
(1) Elementary School - Land Use 520*
Average Weekday:
Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street, One Hour between 7 and 9 AM:
Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street, One Hour between 4 and 6 PM:
PM Peak Hour of Generator
*Trip Generation, I Ith Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021
Mogan Elementary School TIS
Units = Students
i
Average Rate = 2.27"
Average Rate = 0.74
Average Rate = 0.16
Average Rate = 0.45
(50% entering/50% exiting)
(54% entering/46% exiting)
(46% entering/54% exiting)
(46% entering/54% exiting)
a
SANDERSONSTEWARTto"
a sanderson bellecd company
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution is an estimate of site -generated trip routing, which can be determined by several methods, such as
computerized travel demand models, calculation of travel time for various available routes, and/or simple inspection
of existing traffic patterns within the project area. For this study, distribution percentages were calculated based on
existing traffic volumes collected for this study with consideration given to the location of the school in relation to
the district enrollment boundary and the greater Laurel area. Figure 5 on page 10 presents the calculated trip
distribution scheme for this new development.
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
Traffic assignment is the procedure whereby site -generated vehicle trips are assigned to study area streets,
intersections, and site access driveways based on the calculated trip distribution and the physical attributes of the
development site. Using this approach, site -generated trips were assigned to the study area street network for the
purposes of projecting future traffic volumes for analysis. It was assumed that all trips would be made via the
southern parent drop-off area, although some visitor and bus trips are anticipated to occur. The results of the traffic
assignment exercise for the AM, After School, and PM peak hours are also illustrated in Figure 5.
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Traffic Volumes
Based on information provided by the client, a horizon year of 2025 was utilized for the purposes of calculating future
traffic projections for this study. It was assumed that full enrollment capacity of the school would be reached in the
opening year to be conservative in the Future (2025) analysis. In addition to site -generated trips, background traffic
volumes will also likely increase for study area streets and intersections due to general growth on the roadway
network. To account for that growth, Sanderson Stewart analyzed historical MDT traffic data at count stations on
East Main Street and East Maryland Lane in the vicinity of the study area and determined that an average annual
growth rate (AGR) of three (3) percent would be appropriate to apply to existing volumes. Future (2025) volumes
were determined by combining the site -generated traffic assignments and existing traffic volumes with anticipated
background growth applied. Figure 6 on page I I illustrates the resulting AM, After School, and PM peak hour traffic
volume projections for both scenarios.
Intersection Capacity
Sanderson Stewart performed intersection capacity calculations for the Future (2025) scenario based on the AM,
After School, and PM peak hour traffic volume projections presented in Figure 6. Peak hour factors (PHFs) for the
design year are typically assumed to be 0.92, per common industry practice and HCM guidelines. However, to match
peaking characteristics of the existing street network and adjacent school, existing PHFs were used in the Future
(2025) analysis. These values are much lower than 0.92 due to the short duration peaks created by school pick-ups
and drop-offs. PHFs at the new site access intersections were obtained by averaging the values at adjacent
intersections. Figure 6 also shows the LOS results.
Mogan Elementary School TIS E
SANDE RSONSTEWART��
.t,-JerSur �.Ae, c; compunv 411w
(0) (6) (0) V (13) (8) (2)
101 [181 101 [221 [36) [7]
{10%} 0 35 0 30 50 10
®, (0) [010 °� o [01(0) (7) [181 35 12 t6] (2)
I (0) [0) 0 --t s— 0 [0] (0) (0) (010 f— 0 10] (0)
(9) [25) 47 23 112) (4) (0) [01 0 Q 0 10) (0)
40 30 20 0 59 0
}' 1291 [211 [141 101 [31) [0]
00) (8) (5) (0) (11) (0)
(0) (19) 'Y (5) (3)
f: [0) 1551 [��1 1141
0 105 )30 20
901641 (23) (7) [191 35 24 [12) (4)
2 S 6 {1 o%°j' (0) [010 —. .— 010) (0)
90 [651 (23)
0 106
101 [551
(0) (20)
1
[,29 [14 s1 180 2I0
{15%}3 SINE{5
(39) [1101 211 —► 4 0 [0) (0)
[(• j r��' � � � is
-
7.
6
(39) [110] 211 24 1121 (4)
4
t
cir�[1Le7 o 110 I (5) [141 20 —► �— 0 [01 (0)
f .,
KEY
I C XX — AM Peak Hour
✓� JXX1 — After School Peak Hour
- (XX) — PM Peak Hour
(XX%) — Distribution
Figure 5: Trip Distribution & Traffic Assignment Summary
Mogan Elementary School TIS
r1 ��
SANDE RSONSTEWART;�
a sanderson bellecd company �WP-
1
LOS B (61 (A)
31
LOS A (A) (A)
(17) (32) (5)
(7) (18) (0)
113] [30) [01
(24) [76) [101
19 52 2
43 116 13
(6) [151 8
3 [1] (1)
(12) [24142
16 [101 (6)
(36) [82163
--o. LOS 4--
88 [31] (51)
(13) [718
—► LOS
13 [71 (7)
(29) [46] 87
A fAI (A)—
36 (161(8)
(3) [415
A [A] (A)
4 (3] l6)
LOS
1
LOS
LOS
1
LOS
A [A] (A)
A [A] (A)
A [A] (A)
A [A1 (A)
72 36 31
20 93 2
[571 13611261
121 [861 [3)
(58) (33) (23)
(8)(71) (8)
LOS C [B1 (B)
LOS A (A] (A)
2
LOS A [A] (A)
4
LOS B (B) (B)
(23) (17)
(18) (27)
[3111631
(471 (341
66 119
57 61
106 [75] (37)
(39) [36150
44 [27] (37)
LOS
(283) [2121221
—► LOS
229 [206) (355)
A JAI (A),--
107 175] (38)
A [A) (A)
1
LOS
LOS
LOS
C [B] (A)
A [A] (A)
A [Al (A)
32 121
1401 1801
(55) (31)
LOS A [AI (A)
LOS B [A] (A)
,r (46) (5)
[1291 [14]
180 20
-1—,.t
r f r
to 441� W—-i� I
sibs•141
I4
-�` KEY
XX — AM Peak Houp
[XX] — After School Peak Hour
(XX) — PM Peak Hour
LOS A [A] (A) — LOS AM (After School] (PM)
Figure 6: Future (2025) Traffic Projections
(58)[1441240 —► IA SAf— 33120](29)
LOS
A [A] (A)
L•J
LOS
A [A) (A)
(39)[1101211 —,-V VN— 24[12](4)
(24) [48149 — ►LOSA)�— 33 [20] (29)
LOS
A JAI (A)
LOS
A [A] (A)
Mogan Elementary School TIS E
SANDERSONSTEWART41
a a <.�i,erson beiiecCl ,�of.lpljf,v z
Future (2025) capacity results show that all but two intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better during
the AM, After School, and PM peak hours with minimal expected 95th percentile queueing. The northbound
approach at the East Maryland Lane/Alder Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS D during the AM peak
hour, although the delay value is only 0.2 seconds per vehicle over the LOS C threshold. The westbound approach at
the East 8th Street/Alder Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS F during the AM peak hour with a very
lengthy projected 95th percentile queue of 13 vehicles. However, this delay is likely only experienced by vehicles
arriving during the peak 15-minute window, with arrivals during the remaining 45 minutes operating at an acceptable
LOS of B or better. Additionally, as a majority of the vehicles are anticipated to be parents looping through the site
to drop off students at school, these vehicles cannot conflict with themselves so real -world results are likely to be
further improved from the projections. Site access intersections are projected to operate at LOS B or better on all
approaches. A detailed intersection capacity summary table and capacity calculation worksheets for the Future (2025)
traffic projection scenario are included in Appendix C.
Mitigation Alternatives
Potential mitigation options were evaluated based on Existing (2023) and projected Future (2025) volumes to
determine if either scenario may warrant improvements to study area streets and intersections.
Auxiliary Turn Lanes
Auxiliary right- and left -turn lane warrants were evaluated based on the methodology outlined in the MDT Traffic
Engineering Manual (November 2007) for the Existing Conditions (2023) and Future (2025) analysis scenarios. It was
found that a northbound right -turn lane is projected to become warranted at the East 8th Street/Alder Avenue
intersection in the Future (2025) scenario due to the volume of projected new trips to the Mogan Elementary School.
However, it should be noted that turn lane warrants are generally meant for application on higher speed highway
facilities and this lane is not necessary to improve safety nor would it improve the projected capacity deficiencies at
the intersection to acceptable levels. Auxiliary turn lane warrant worksheets for the Existing Conditions (2023) and
Future (2025) scenarios can be found in Appendix D.
Traffic Signals
Traffic signal warrants were evaluated at the East Main Street/Alder Avenue intersection using criteria outlined in the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for the Existing Conditions (2023) and Future (2025) traffic
volume scenarios. The MUTCD presents several warrants that can be considered based on traffic volumes, school
crossings, crash history, and others. For the purposes of this analysis Warrants 4, 5, and 9 (Pedestrian Volume,
School Crossing, and Intersection Near a Grade Crossing) were not evaluated as there is not a crosswalk across East
Main Street nor any railroad crossings near the intersection. Additionally, satisfaction of the Peak Hour warrant alone
should not be considered as warranting a signal, as it is primarily meant for application at office complexes,
manufacturing plants, or other high -occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles
over a short time.
No signal warrants are currently met or projected to be met in the Future (2025) scenario at the East Main
Street/Alder Avenue intersection. Traffic signal warrant worksheets for the Existing Conditions (2023) and Future
(2025) scenarios can be found in Appendix D.
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDE RSONSTEWARTto
a sandcr;on beHecd company ��
Improved Intersection Capacity
East 8th Street/Alder Avenue intersection: Conversion of this intersection to all -way stop -control operation is
projected to improve delay to LOS C or better during all peak hours. With the addition of Mogan Elementary School
on East 8th Street, volumes on all three approaches at this intersection are projected to be relatively balanced,
providing appropriate conditions for installation of all -way stop -control. Introducing stop -control on Alder Avenue at
this intersection would be consistent within the existing network, as the East 6th Street/Alder Avenue intersection
already operates with all -way stop -control and Alder Avenue is currently stop -controlled at its intersection with East
Maryland Avenue.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
The preceding analysis has shown that the proposed Mogan Elementary School in Laurel, Montana will generate a
moderate amount of increased traffic demand on area streets and intersections. It is estimated that approximately
1,335 gross trips could be generated by the school daily.
An evaluation of Existing Conditions (2023) intersection capacity showed that all study area intersections operate at
LOS B or better during all three peak hours with minimal 95th percentile queuing.
A crash history analysis found that all historical crash rates for study intersections are equal to or less than the
predicted crash rates. There were no crash type trends that were noted.
Intersection capacity analysis results for the Future (2025) scenario are projected to operate at LOS C or better at
all but two intersections. The northbound approach at the East Maryland Lane/Alder Avenue intersection is projected
to operate just above the LOS C cutoff during the AM peak hour, and the westbound approach at the East 8th
Street/Alder Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS F during the AM peak hour. However, due to
peaking characteristics at schools, this delay value is likely to last for only a short 15-minute period, with the
remainder of the hour operating with acceptable LOS. The new site access intersections on the south side of the site
are projected to operate at LOS B or better on all approaches with all trips assigned to the southern accesses only
and not the bus/visitor loop.
It was found that a northbound right -turn lane is projected to be warranted in the Future (2025) scenario, although
the MDT turn lane warrants are primarily meant for application on higher speed facilities and this lane is not needed
as a safety improvement or projected to improve capacity deficiencies. No traffic signal warrants are projected to be
met for either the Existing Conditions (2023) or Future (2025) scenarios.
It was found that implementation of all -way stop -control at the East 8th Street/Alder Avenue intersection is
projected to improve operations to LOS C or better during all scenarios. This change in intersection control would
be consistent with other configurations along Alder Avenue and may help improve safety for any children crossing
Alder Avenue by introducing another required stopping point adjacent to the school.
Mogan Elementary School TIS
SANDERSONSTEWART40
a sanderson bellecd company �-
Recommendations
The following list of recommendations is based on the analysis results from this study and the professional judgment
of the author:
Stop (RI-1) signs should be installed on the westbound approach at the East 8th Street/Alder Avenue
intersection and at all new site access driveways that allow egress movements.
Implementation of all -way stop -control should be considered at the East 8th Street/Alder Avenue
intersection to improve capacity. Operations should be monitored at the intersection to determine if and
when this change should be installed.
All transportation -related improvements shall be designed in accordance with City of Laurel, Yellowstone
County, and/or MDT standards (where applicable) and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD).
Mogan Elementary School TIS E
TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
E �l D- !J R I
C®RIPMNAU N I TY
DESIGN
SANDERSONtft
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
AM Peak Hour (7:30 - 8:30
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
Maryland Lane
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
Maryland Lane
Maryland Lane
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
7:30 AM
2
4
1
0
7
1
1
6
0
8
5
14
3
0
22
0
25
1
0
26
63
7:45 AM
7
7
0
0
14
3
3
15
0
21
23
23
1
0
47
1
32
7
0
40
122
8:00 AM
6
2
0
0
8
5
0
5
0
10
9
13
3
0
25
2
20
3
0
25
68
8:15 AM
3
3
1
0
7
1
2
4
0
7
1
9
1
0
11
0
6
1
0
7
32
GrMta
16
2
0
36
10
6
30
0
46
38
59
8
0
105
3
83
12
0
98
285
Medium
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.G
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
e
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
1.7
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
S.G
0.7
0.0
IZ.G
3.5
2.1
10.5
0.0
16.1
13.3
20.7
2.8
0.0
3G.8
1.1
29.1
4.2
0.034.4
100.0
4
0.G4
0.64
0.55 1
0.55 1
0.55 1
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.61 1
0.61 1
0.61
0.58
Alder Avenue
In
Out
3G
17
RT
TH LT I
U
18
16 1 2
0
7
�_ pW°
T
O
N
o0
r
y
0
Total Entering
O
C
285
n
a
w
�D
o
F
00
c CD
O
F
C
Ln
rt
c.
co
0 1
30 1 6 1 10
U I
LT I TH I RT
GG
46
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Tronstech Way I Billings, Montano 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
AM
SANDERSON t'�
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023
urisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period.
After School Peak Hour 2:30 - 3:30 P
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street.
Alder Avenue
East/West Street
Maryland Lane
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
Maryland Lane
Maryland Lane
Suthbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
2:30 PM
4
5
0
0
9
G
G
13
0
25
15
55
7
0
77
0
it
0
0
11
122
2:45 PM
1
2
0
0
3
2
3
4
0
9
1
12
2
0
15
0
9
1
0
10
37
3:00 PM
1
4
0
0
5
2
2
2
0
G
2
7
2
0
11
1
4
2
0
7
29
3:15PM
6
0
0
0
6
1
3
7
0
11
2
3
3
0
8
0
5
1
0
6
31
Grand Total
12
11
0
0
23
11
14
26
0
51
20
77
14
0
111
1
29
4
0
34
219
Medium Truck %
8.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
0.0
14.3
0.0
0.0
3.9
0.0
2.6
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
8.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.3
0.0
14.3
0.0
0.0
3.9
0.0
2.6
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total %1
5.5
1 5.0
1 0.0
1 0.0
1 10.5
1 5.0
1 6.4
11.9
1 0.0
1 23.3
1 9.1
1 35.2
1 6.4
1 0.0
1 50.7
1 0.5
1 13.2
1 1.8
1 0.0
15.5
100.0
PHF
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.51
0.51
0.51
i 0.35
1 0.35
1 0.35
1
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.44
Alder Avenue
In
Out
23
29
RT
TH LT
U
12
11 0
0
O
t A
q
Total Entering
o
[
c
219
a
0
a
n
y
�
�D
o
F
a
"
1
0
26 1 14 1 11
U
LT I TH I RT
35
51
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montano 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersortstewart.com
SANDERSON(W,
STEWART
Counted By:
Agency/Company:
Date Performed:
Count Time Period:
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
Connor Scales
Sanderson Stewart
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 P
COUNT SUMMARY
Intersection: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Laurel, MT
ct
[rojeNumber:
orth/South Street:
23103
Alder Avenue
Project Description:
East/West Street:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
Maryland Lane
Alder Avenue
Southbound
Alder Avenue
Northbound
Maryland Lane
Eastbound
Maryland Lane
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
O.S4
5:00 PM
1
3
0
0
4
2
4
5
0
11
2
10
3
0
15
0
10
1
0
11
41
5:15 PM
0
3
0
0
3
0
5
15
0
20
8
11
1
0
20
0
9
2
0
11
54
5:30 PM
2
2
0
0
4
4
7
G
0
17
7
5
1
0
13
1
8
0
0
9
43
5:45 PM
4
3
0
0
7
11
8
19
0
38
2
8
1
0
11
0
21
1
0
22
78
Grand Total
7
1 11
1 0
0
1 18
1 17
J 24
45
0
1 86 1
19
1 34
1 G
1 0
1 59
1 1
1 48
1 4
1 0
1 53
21G
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total %
3.2
5.1
0.0
0.0
8.3
7.9
11.1
20.8
0.0
39.8
8.8
11.7
2.8
0.0
27.3
0.5
22.2
1.9
0.0
24.5
100.0
PFIF
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.57
0.57
0.57
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.70
I a
C
Avenue
In Out
18 31
RT TH LT U
7 1 11 0 1 0
o
0
A
r
Total Entering C:
216
34
Out
Alder Avenue
In
o
1300 North Trarntech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fox 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
SANDERSON(W
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East 8th Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023Jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
AM Peak Hour :30 - 8:30
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th
Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street
East 8th Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East 8th Street
East 8th Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Ri ht
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Ri ht
Thor Left U-turn Total
Ri ht
Thru
Left U-tum Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.p0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
17:30
AM
9
2
0
11
4
5
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
7
27
7:45 AM
rRight
3G
7
1
44
G
14
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
G
0
14
78
8:00 AM
13
3
0
1G
1
G
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
G
29
8:15AM
4
0
0
4
3
5
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
4
1 16
Grand Total
0
62
12
1
75
14
30
0
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
16
0
31
150
Medium Truck %
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total %1
0.0
1 41.3
1 8.0
1 0.7
1 50.0
1 9.3
1 20.0
1 0.0
1 0.0
1 29.3
1 0.0
1 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.7
0.0
20.7
100.0
PHF1
0.43
1 0.43
0.43
1
1 0.55
1 0.55
0.55
1.00
1.00
1 1.00
0.55
1 0.55
1 0.55
0.48
Alder Avenue
In
Out
75
46
RT
TH
LT
U
0
62
12
1
G
a
.� o
x
5
v
Total Entering
CD[
h w
Cn
150
oo
n
N
a
�
o
1
0
0 30 14
U
LT TH I RT
78
44
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Tronstech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
AM
SANDERSON t�•�
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East 8th Street
gency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
After School Peak Hour 2:30 - 3:30 PM)
roject Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East 8th Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East 8th Street
East 8th Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thor
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2:30 PM
0
21
4
0
25
7
18
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
4
0
7
57
2:45 PM
0
4
0
0
4
7
6
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
4
21
3:00 PM
0
4
2
0
6
7
5
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
5
23
3:15PM
0
0
2
0
2
3
9
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
]
0
3
17
Grand Total
0
29
8
0
37
24
38
0
0
62
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
9
0
19
118
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total %
0.0 1
24.6
6.8
0.0
31.4
20.3
32.2
0.0
0.0
52.5 1
0.0
0.0 Ji
0.0
1 0.0 1
0.0 1
8.5 1
0.0 1
7.6
0.0
16.1
100.0
PHFJ
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.62
0.62
0.62
1
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.68 1
0.68 1
0.68
0.52
Alder Avenue
In
Out
37
48
RT TH LT
U
0 29 8
0
a
o
Eli _
y
Total Entering
[
tT
rn
118
g.
w
�D
0
F
O
c CD
w
O
N
�
O
1
0
0 38 24
U
LT TH RT
38
62
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Tronstech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersor6lewart.com
SANDERSON=
STEWART 3
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By.
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East 8th Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
PM Peak Hour 5:00 -
6:00 P
Project Number.
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East 8th Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East 8th Street
East 8th Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00 1
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
5:00 PM
0
3
1
0
4
2
8
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
17
5:15 PM
0
3
4
0
7
2
16
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
0
7
32
5:30 PM
0
5
2
0
7
3
11
0
0
1 14
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
10
31
5:45 PM
0
6
1
0
7
3
17
0
0
1 20
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
7
34
Grand Total
0
17
8
0
25
10
52
0
0
62
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
14
0
27
114
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
HeavyTruck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total %
0.0
14.9
7.0
0.0
2L9
8.8
45.6
0.0
0.0
54.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.4
0.0
12.3
0.0
23.7
100.0
PHFJ
0.89
1 0.89
1 0.89
1
0.78
0.78
0.78
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.84
Alder Avenue
In
Out
25
65
RT
TH
LT
U
0
17
8
0
w
07
� o
Total Entering
h
N
114
-5
a-
on
w
�
o
on
a
O
rC
OG
a
1
0
0 1 52 1 10
U
LT I TH I RT
31
62
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Tram -tech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 mww.sondersonstewart.com
SANDERSON(W,
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scoles
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East 6th Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023Jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
AM Peak Hour 7:30 - 8:30 AM)
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East 6th Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East 6th Street
East 6th Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thor
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
7:30 AM
3
8
0
0
11
0
8
6
0
14
2
1
0
0
3
1
3
2
0
6
34
7:45 AM
6
34
1
0
41
0
15
11
0
26
2
3
3
0
8
1
5
2
0
8
83
8:00 AM
2
14
2
0
18
1
3
1
0
5
2
1
2
0
5
0
3
0
0
3
31
8:15 AM
1
6
0
0
7
1
6
1
0
8
1
3
0
0
4
2
1
0
0
3
22
Grand TotalL12
62
3
0
77
2
32
19
0
53
7
8
5
0
20
4
12
4
0
20
170
Medium Truck %
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
25.0
0.0
15.0Hea
Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.5
0.0
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0Total
Truck %
.
1.6
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
10.5
0.0
3.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
25.0
0.0
15.0
Total %
7.1
36.5
1.8
0.0
45.3
1.2
18.8
11.2
0.0
31.2
4.1
4.7
2.9
0.0
11.8
2.4
7.1
2.4
0.0
11.8
100.0
PHF
0.47
0.47
1 0.47
0.51
0.51 1
0.51
1
0.58
0.58 1
0.58
1
0.61
0.61
0.61
1
1 1
0.51
Alder Avenue
In
77L
RT TH LT
U
+4ut
12 62 3
0
Q 7
O
7
Total EnteringC,
[
w
a
R
x
170
C,
n
w
o
rt
O
N
-
W
O
H
cc
rrr
0
19 1 32 1 2
U
LT I TH I RT
73
53
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montano 59102 1 Phone 406,656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
OQUA
SANDERSON Fa
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East 6th Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
After School Peak Hour 2:30 - 3:30 P
Project Number.
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street
East 6th Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East 6th Street
East 6th Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Ri ht
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Ri ht
Thru Left U-turn Total
Ri ht Thru
Left U-tum Total
Total
Factor
FRight
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.82:30
PM26
3
0
29
1
17
1
19550
12
2
1
1
0
4
64
2:45 PM
3
0
0
5
2
10
0
011
0
2
0
2
2
0
4
23
3:00 PM
7
0
0
7
0
11
0
Iff
f
2
10
0
3
1
1
0
0
2
23
3:15PM
2
0
0
2
0
14
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
4
21
Grand Total
2
38
3
0
43
3
52
2
0
57
4
1 7
6
0
17
4
7
3
0
14
131
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.0
0.0
7.1
Heavv Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.0
0.0
7.1
Total %1
1.5
1 29.0
1 23
1 0.0
32.8
1 2.3
39.7
1.5
0.0
43.5
3.1
5.3
4.6
0.0
13.0
3.1
5.3
2.3
1 0.0
10.7
100.0
PHF'
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.50
Alder Avenue
In
Out
43
62
RT
TI-I LT
U
2
38 3
0
7
� J
WW
1
A 7
v
Total Entering
m
131
W
o
a
0
n
rt
1
0
2 1 52 1 3
U
LT I TH I RT
45
57
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersortstewart.com
SANDERSONIft
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
nted By:
ncy/Company:
- Performed:
nt Time Period:
Connor Scoles
Sanderson Stewart
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 P
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East Gth Street
Laurel, MT
ect Number:
th/South Street:
23103
Alder Avenue
Project Description:
East/West Street:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
East Gth Street
7Factorl.00
Alder Avenue
Southbound
Alder Avenue
Northbound
East Gth Street
Eastbound
East Gth Street
Westbound
Int.
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Right Thru Left U-turn Total
Total
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
0.84
1 0.84
1 0.84
1 0.84
0.84
1 0.84
1 0.94
1 0.84
5:45 PMJ
2
1 7
1 2
1 0
1 ] 1
1 0
1 18
1 2
1 0
1 20 1
0
1 3
1 4
1 0
1 7
1 3
1 4
1 1
1 0
8
1 46
Grand Total
4
23
3
0
30
8
57
8
0
73
3
12
1 5
0
20
1 4
7
G
0
17
140
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.9
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.9
Total %1
2.9
1 16.4 1
2.1 i
0.0
21.4 1
5.7
i 40.7 1
5.7
1 0.0 1
52.]
2.1
8.6
3.6
0.0
14.3
2.9 1
5.0
1 4.3 1
0.0
12.1
100.0
PHF1
0.68 1
0.68 1
0.68 1
1
1
0.91 1
0.91 1
0.91
1 i
1
0.69 1
0.69 1
0.69
1 i
1
0.50 1
0.50 1
0.50 1
1
0.74
Avenue
In I Out
30 GG
RT TH LT 1
4 23 3 1 0
7 c,
~ � x
O r
Total Entering o C�
140
o
a
o
M
32
Out
Alder Avenue
73
In
W I 0
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersortstewort.com
SANDERSON=
STEWART 3
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scoles
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East Main Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
AM Peak Hour :30
- 8:30
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East Main Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East Main Street
East Main Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Ri ht
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-tum Total
Right
Thru Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-tum Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
7:30 AM
2
0
6
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
53
3
0
56
7
50
0
0
57
121
7:45 AM
15
0
16
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
49
6
0
55
8
79
0
0
87
173
8:00 AM
7
0
11
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
53
1
0
54
2
48
0
0
50
122
8:15 AM
1
0
6
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
53
4
0
57
2
39
0
0
41
105
Grand Total
25
0
39
0
64
0
0
0
0
0
0
208
14
0
222
19
216
0
0
235
521
Medium Truck %
4.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.4
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
2.6
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
0.0
2.7
5.3
5.1
0.0
0.0
5.1
Total Truck %
4.0
0.0
2.6
0.0
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
0.0
2.7
5.3
5.6
0.0
0.0
5.5
Total %1
4.8
0.0
1 7.5
1 0.0
12.3
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 0.0
1 39.9
2.7
0.0
42.6
3.6
41.5
0.0
0.0
45.1
100.0
PHFJ
0.52
1 0.52
1 0.52
1
1
1 1.00
1 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.67
1 0.67
1 0.67
0.75
Alder Avenue
In
Out
64
33
RT
TH
LT
U
25
0
39
0
� �
a
x
o N
N
5
Total Entering
o
[
521
n
U
�D
o
rt
F
r�r N
N
a
a0
J
O
rt
1
0
0 0 0
U
LT TH RT
0
0
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way 1 Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.656.52551 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
SANDERSON t�
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scales
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East Main Street
gency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel,
MT
Count Time Period:
After School Peak Hour 2:30 - 3:30 P
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel
- New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East Main Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East Main Street
East Main Street
Southbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thru
Left U-turn Total
Right
Thor Left U-turn Total
Right
Thor
Left U-turn Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1 1.00
1.00
1.00
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
2:30 PM
13
0
11
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gl
4
0
65
6
46
0
0
52
141
2:45 PM
3
0
4
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
55
3
0
58
3
47
0
0
50
115
3:00 PM
4
0
4
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
47
4
0
51
0
52
0
0
52
111
3:15 PM
4
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
5
0
42
5
49
0
0
54
100
Grand Total
24
0
19
0
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
16
0
216
14
194
0
0
208
467
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
1.4
Heavy Truck %
4.2
0.0
5.3
0.0
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
5.2
0.0
0.0
4.8
Total Truck %
4.2
0.0
5.3
0.0
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
6.7
0.0
0.0
6.3
Total %1
5.1
1 0.0
1 4.1 1
0.0 1
9.2 1
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
1 0.0
1 0.0 1
0.0
1 42.8
1 3.4 1
0.0
1 46.3 1
3.0
1 41.5 1
0.0
0.0
44.5
100.0
PHF
0.45
0.45
0.45
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.83
0.83
0.83
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
Alder Avenue
In
Out
43
30
RT
TH LT
U
24
0 19
0
0 N
O
t'
�
0
yTotal
Entering
O
[
;?
c
467
7.
h
a
F
0
L-'
O
0
1
0
0 0 0
U
LT TH RT
0
0
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montana 59102 1 Phone 406.65&5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
SANDERSON(W,
STEWART
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT
COUNT SUMMARY
Counted By:
Connor Scoles
Intersection:
Alder Avenue & East Main Street
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date Performed:
Wednesday, September 20, 2023jurisdiction:
Laurel, MT
Count Time Period:
PM Peak Hour 5:00 - 6:00 P
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
North/South Street:
Alder Avenue
East/West Street:
East Main Street
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
East Main Street
East Main Street
Suthbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Int.
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left U-tum Total
Right
Thm
Left U-tum Total
Fight
Thor Left U-turn Total
Right
Thor
Left U-tum Total
Total
Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
5:00 PM
3
0
4
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
90
2
0
92
7
90
0
0
97
196
5:15 PM
3
0
2
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
8
0
65
9
87
0
0
96
166
5:30 PM
6
0
5
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
75
9
0
84
10
83
0
0
93
188
5:45 PM
5
0
2
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
11
0
56
5
75
0
0
80
143
Grand Total
17
0
13
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
267
30
0
297
31
335
0
0
366
693
Medium Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
Heavy Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
Total Truck %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.5
Total %1
2.5
1 0.0
1 1.9
1 0.0
1 4.3
1 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 0.0
1 38.5
1 4.3
1 0.0
1 42.9
1 4.5
1 48.3
0.0
0.0
52.8
100.0
PHFJ
1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1
1
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1
1
1 0.81
1 0.81
1 0.81
1
1
1 0.94
1 0.94
1 0.94
0.88
Alder Avenue
In
Out
30
61
RT
TH
LT
U
17
0
13
1 0
7 N
tWi
.4 l�
O
o
H
Total Entering
[
��
a
r
693
Ch
U
o
rt
F
o
N
l�
t-J
O
C
N
1
0
0 0 0
U
LT TH RT
0
0
Out
In
Alder Avenue
1300 North Transtech Way I Billings, Montano 59102 1 Phone 406.656.5255 1 Fax 406.656.0967 1 www.sandersonstewart.com
CAPACITY CALCULATIONS -
EXISTING CONDITIONS (2023)
Intersection
Approach
Existing 2023
AM Peak
After School Peak
PM Peak
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th
Queue
(veh)
Intersection Control
Way Stop-Cont I NB/SB
E Maryland Lane &
Alder Avenue
NB
12.1
B
1
12.8
B
1
10.5
B
I
SB
10.8
B
1
10.4
B
1
9.6
A
I
EB
0.6
A
1
0.9
A
1
0.8
A
I
WB
0.9
A
1
0.9
A
1
0.6
A
Intersection
3.9
A
--
4.0
A
--
6.0
A
--
Intersection Control
One -Way Stop -Control WB
E 8th Street &
Alder Avenue
SB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
EB
2.4
A
1
1.6
A
1
2.4
A
I
WB
9.0
A
1
9.2
A
I
9.0
1 A
I
Intersection
3.4
A
--
1.9
A
I --
2.4
1 A
--
Intersection Control
All -Way Stop- ontrol
E 6th Street &
Alder Avenue
NB
7.4
A
1
7.5
A
1
7.4
1 A
I
SB
7.4
A
1
7.8
A
1
7.3
A
EB
7.3
A
1
7.5
A
1
7.3
A
WB
7.3
A
1
7.4
A
1
7.4
A
Intersection
7.4
A
--
7.6
A
--
7.4
A
--
Intersection Control
One-Wa Stop -Control SB
E Main Street &
Alder Avenue
NB
10.8
B
1
10.8
B
1
11.7
B
I
EB
0.5
A
1
0.6
A
1
0.8
A
I
WB
0.0
A
0
1 0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
Intersection
1.5
A
2.1
A
0.8
A
Generated with SAN DE RSO N (01
STEWART®�®
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 12.8
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.104
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
_
a
IT
1.1_-
4=
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
b
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
1100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]^.n0
r7.0n
0.00
0_00
0.00
1 0.00
0.00
0.00
1 0_n0
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
30
6
10
2
16
18
8
59
38
12
83
3
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.70
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh[h]
30
6
10
2
16
1 18
8
1 59
38
12
83
3
Peak Hour Factor
0.5500
0.5500
0.5500
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
0.5600
0.5600
0.5600
0.6100
0.6100
0.6100
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
14
3
5
1
6
7
4
26
17
5
34
1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
55
11
18
3
25
28
14
105
68
20
136
5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 1 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSONIft
STEWART�+j
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1 11
1
1
10
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.10
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.01
9.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
12.80
12.40
9.95
11.88
12.12
9.41
7.49
0.00
7.57
U.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
95th-Percentile Queue Length [Un]
12.40
1 12.40
1 12.40
6.69
1 6.69
6.69
0.63
0.63
1 0.63
1 0.85
1 0.85
0.85
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
12.14
10.75
0.56
0.94
Approach LOS
B
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.85
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 2 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON I&
STEWART °'®
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.6
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.020
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbb�ound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
ICI
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.
100.c
100
100.00
100.E
100.(.:
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
"
0 On
0 '
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
30
14
13
62
16
15
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
30
14
13
62
16
15
Peak Hour Factor
1.0000
1.0000
0.4300
1.0000
1.0000
0.5500
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
8
4
8
16
4
7
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
30
14
30
62
16
27
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 3 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON(W.
STEWAR.
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.00
0.01u
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.03
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.00
0.00
7.32
C.00
9.60
8.64
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.14
0.14
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ftAn]
0.00
0.00
1.27
1.27
3.57
3.57
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
2.39
9.00
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.39
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 4 10/5/2023
Generated with ` SANDERSONt®
STEWART��®
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 7.3
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.085
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
RightJ2.O
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00.00
100.00
100.00
100.;
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
n.00
r� r,n
0 pn,
r, 00
On
O,rn
0.00
0 00
0.00
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
19
32
2
3
62
12
7
8
5
4
12
4
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
19
32
2
3
62
12
7
8
5
4
12
4
Peak Hour Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1 moo
1.0000
T0000
1.on
Tom
Ton
Ton
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
5
8
1
1
16
3
2
2
1
1
3
1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
19
32
2
3
62
12
7
8 1
5
4
12
4
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 5 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
SANDERSON(ft
STEWART
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
869
903
867
867
Degree of Utilization, x
0.06
0.09
0.02
0.02
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
0.19
0.28
0.07
0.07
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
4.86
6.97
1.77
1.77
Approach Delay [s/veh]
7.41
7.36
7.25
7.25
Approach LOS
A
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
7.35
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 6 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON(®
STEWART ` J
Delay (sec / veh): 11.4
Level Of Service: B
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.063
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
u
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.01,
00.,J
100.00
10C '
100.Gu
HOC_
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
39
25
14
208
216
19
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%j
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips (veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips (veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh[h]
39
25
14
208
216
19
Peak Hour Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
10
6
4
52
54
5
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
39
25
14
208
216
19
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 7 10/5/2023
Generated with SANDERSON(W-,
STEWAR.
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
0
0
Movement, Approach, $ Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.0Q
O.OG
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
11.36
9.97
7.73
c.c;
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
0.31
0.31
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
7.73
7.73
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
10.82
0.49
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
1.54
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 1: 1 AM Peak Hour (2023) 8 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON(®
STEWARTS'J
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 13.3
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.052
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southttbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
�
, L
t= =>
4= =>
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.G:
i00.r,
i00.0
,.,
00 0
uii.,;,i
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
9 n0
9 Q^
0.00
0 no
^ C")
n cn
n
0.00
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
26
14
11
0
11
12
14
77
20
4
29
1
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
14.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.30
0.00
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh[h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/hj
26 j
14
11 1
0
11
12
14
77
20
4
29
1
Peak Hour Factor
0.5100
0.5100
0.5100
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
0.3500
0.3500
0.3500
0.7700
0.7700
0.7700
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
13
7
5
0
4
5
10
55
14
1
9
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
51
27
22
0
17
19
40
220
57
5
38
1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 1 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON(W
STEWART���
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.10
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
13.28
13.34
10.90
2.45
12.21
8.82
7.32
0.00
7.78
Movement LOS
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.64
0.64
0.64
D.16
0.16
0.16
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
16.02
16.02
16.02
-1.06
4.06
4.06
1.78
1.78
1.78
0.21
1 0.21
0.21
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
12.77
10.42
10.92
0.88
Approach LOS
B
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.99
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 2 10/5/2023
Generated with �� SANDERSON(®
STEWART��
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.8
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.017
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
II
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
10C
100.1
100.00
100.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0 '
n,
n
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
38
24
8
29
9
10
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
38
24
8
29
9
10
Peak Hour Factor
0.6200
0.6200
0.3700
0.3700
0.6800
0.6800
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
15
10
5
20
3
4
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
61
39
22
78
13
15
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 3 10/5/2023
Generated with WE=
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON (W.
STEWART �
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.00
C.00
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.0o
O.OG
7.42
0.00
9.76
8.79
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.10
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.93
2.47
2.47
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
1.63
19.24
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
1.85
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 4 10/5/2023
Generated with SA N DE R SO N (®
STEWART +®
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 7.6
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.133
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
< u=>
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
J
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
' 00.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100-00
100.00
100.00
I00.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
o_no
n_00
^.00
0 00
1 n nn
n nn
O.On
j r,
n nn
n n,,-
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
2
52
3
3
38
2
6
7
4
3
7
4
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.30
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
2
52
3
3
38
2
6
7
4
3
7
4
Peak Hour Factor
0.7500
0.7500
0.7500
0.3700
0.3700
0.3700
0.3400
0.3400
0.3400
0.8800
0.8800
0.8800
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1
17
1
2
26
1
4
5
3
1
2
1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
3
69
4
8
103
5
18
21
12
3
8
5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 5 10/5/2023
Generated with wz=
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
SANDERSON(�
STEWART M
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
869
875
844
829
Degree of Utilization, x
0.09
0.13
0.06
0.02
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
0.29
0.46
0.19
0.06
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
7.17
11.41
4.81
1.48
Approach Delay [s/veh]
7.54
7.75
7.54
7.43
Approach LOS
A
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
7.63
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 6 10/5/2023
Generated with �(� SANDERSON(®
STEWART���
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 11.8
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.070
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
a u
W
tl
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.C„
100.:_
100.00
i0G.i,.:
10
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
^
n
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
19
24
16
200
194
14
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
5.30
4.20
0.00
4.50
6.70
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
19
24
16
200
194
14
Peak Hour Factor
0.4500
0.4500
0.8300
0.8300
1.0000
1.0000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume (veh/h]
11
13
5
60
49
4
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
42
53
19
241
194
14
Pedestrian Volume (ped/h]
0
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 7 10/5/2023
Generated with MUIRM9
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSONIft
STEWART��
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, MovementV/C Ratio
0.07
0.06
0.01
0.o13
0.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
11.79
10.09
7.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
B
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
0.46
0.46
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ftAn]
11.50
11.50
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
10.84
0.56
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.09
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 2: 2 After School Peak Hour (2023) 8 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON (®
STEWART`5
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 10.9
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.057
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
r�
t U>3
JL
_� >
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
11
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
30.G:
'.00.00
100.00
100.u:C
i00.00
100.E
100.00
100.C;
00.0
00.0;
i00'C'
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
45
24
17
0
11
7
6
34
19
4
48
1
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh[h]
45
24
17
0
11
7
6
34
19
4
48
1
Peak Hour Factor
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.6000
0.6000
0.6000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
20
11
7
0
4
3
2
9
5
2
20
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
79
42
30
0
17
11
6
34
19
7 1
80
2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 1 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON(f♦
STEWART�Z
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.10
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
10.71
10.92
9.53
10.09
8.81
7.36
U.00
7.31
Movement LOS
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.69
0.69
0.69
0.11
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
17.28
17.28
17.28
2.68
2.68
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.29
0.29
0.29
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
10.54
9.59
0.75
0.57
Approach LOS
B
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
5.98
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 2 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON(®
STEWART��
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.2
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.017
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration=
rua
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.
100.('
100,
100.00
i00.'"
100.6.,
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0 10
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
52
10
8
17
14
13
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
52
10
8
17
14
13
Peak Hour Factor
0.7800
0.7800
0.8900
0.8900
0.9600
0.9600
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
17
3
2
5
4
3
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
67
13
9
19
15
14
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 3 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSONd&,
STEWART�+�
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.01
0.02
0.01
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
_ -
7.36
9.19
8.75
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.10
0.10
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ftAn]
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.38
2.40
2.40
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
2.37
8.97
Approach LOS
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.38
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 4 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON10,
STEWART s�a
Delay (sec / veh): 7.4
Level Of Service: A
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.091
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
)0.
00.00
100.00
100.0"
00.00
1GO.Go
i00.G;,
100.00
100 i;
00.G
90.16
iOQOJ
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
r
r.
-, nn
0
i
-,n
o,
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
8
57
8
3
23
4
5
12
3
6
7
4
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
8
57
8
3
23
4
5
12
3
6
7
4
Peak Hour Factor
0.9100
0.9100
0.9100
0.6800
0.6800
0.6800
0.6900
0.6900
0.6900
0.5000
0.5000
0.5000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
2
16
2
1
8
1
2
4
1
3
4
2
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
9
63
9
4
34
6
7
17
4
12
14
8
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 5 10/5/2023
Generated with SANDERSON;W
STEWART
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
892
889
864
853
Degree of Utilization, x
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.04
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
0.30
0.16
0.10
0.12
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
7.47
3.90
2.51
3.11
Approach Delay [s/veh]
7.44
7.26
7.30
7.40
Approach LOS
A
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
7.37
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 6 10/5/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
SANDERSON(
STEWART��J
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 13.0
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.028
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
A u
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100
10C
100.00
100.00
100 '-
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
n,nn
r np
n nn
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
13
17
30
267
335
31
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.60
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
13
17
30
267
335
31
Peak Hour Factor
1.0000
1.0000
0.8100
0.8100
0.9400
0.9400
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
3
4
9
82
89
8
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
13
17
37
330
356
33
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 7 10/5/2023
Generated with =� SANDESTEART��WART
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
12.97
10.66
8.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
B
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehnn]
0.17
0.17
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
4.15
4.15
2.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
11.66
0.82
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
0.83
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 3: 3 PM Peak Hour (2023) 8 10/5/2023
CAPACITY CALCULATIONS -
FUTURE (2025)
ENDURING
C MM U N iTY
DESIGN
Intersection
Approach
Future 2025
AM Peak
After School Peak
PM Peak
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th %
Queue
(veh)
Avg
Delay
(s/veh)
LOS
95th
Queue
(veh)
Intersection Control
Two-WayStop-Cont a/ NB/SB
E Maryland Lane &
Alder Avenue
NB
25.2
D
4
20.4
C
3
11.4
B
2
SB
14.8
B
1
12.9
B
1
10.0
A
I
EB
0.4
A
1
0.8
A
1
0.6
A
I
WB
2.2
A
1
2.7
A
1
1.0
A
I
Intersection
10.1
B
--
7.9
A
--
6.8
A
--
Intersection Control
One-WayStop-Control WB
E 8th Street &
Alder Avenue
NB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
1 A
0
SB
5.3
A
1
5.2
A
1
4.5
A
I
WB
84.4
F
13
17.8
B
2
9.5
A
I
Intersection
32.0
D
--
6.9
A
--
4.1
A
--
Intersection Control
All -Way Stop -Control
E 6th Street &
Alder Avenue
NB
9.8
A
2
8.4
A
1
7.6
A
I
SB
11.2
B
3
9.5
A
2
7.4
A
I
EB
9.4
A
1
8.8
A
1
7.6
A
I
WB
8.7
A
1
8.0
A
1
7.5
A
Intersection
10.4
B
--
9.1
A
--
7.5
A
--
Intersection Control
One-Wa Stop -Control SB
E Main Street &
Alder Avenue
SB
15.5
C
2
12.2
B
2
12.1
B
I
EB
1.5
A
1
1.1
A
1
1.0
A
I
WB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
Intersection
4.3
A
--
3.6
A
--
1.0
A
--
Intersection Control
One-Wa Stop -Control SB
E 8th Street &
School Exit
SB
11.4
B
2
9.9
A
2
8.8
A
I
EB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
WB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
Intersection
4.8
A
1 4.6
A
I --
3.3
A
--
Intersection Control
One-Wa Sto -Control SB
E 8th Street &
School Entrance
EB
6.5
A
1
5.3
A
1
4.6
A
I
WB
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
0.0
A
0
Intersection
5.3
A
4.4
1 A
3.0
1 A
--
Generated with �� SANDERSONt®
STEWART�
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 27.4
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: D
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.387
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
ft
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
t,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00A0
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.G..
i00.00
100.00
100.00
100.,,;
:00.00
100.Jci
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
",
r '
n.nn
0.00
n ^r.
•n
n,n
n nn
O.C"
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
72 736
31
2
52
19
8
63
87
36
88
3
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.70
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
72
36
31
2
52
19
8
63
87
36
88
3
Peak Hour Factor
0.5500
0.5500
0.5500
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
0.5600
0.5600
0.5600
0.6100
0.6100
0.6100
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh[h]
33
16
14
1
20
7
4
28
39
15
36
1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
131
65
56
3
81
30
14
112
155
59
144
5
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 1 10/23/2023
Generated with W'
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON l&-
STEWAR,
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.39
0.14
0.07
0.01
0.20
0.03
0.01
0.05
�.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
27.38
24.63
20.94
17.76
16.03
11.30
7.51
7.82
0.00
7.00
Movement LOS
D
C
C
C
C
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehlln]
3.75
3.75
3.75
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.10
0.10
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
93.80
93.80
93.80
22.92
22.92
22.92
0.66
1 0.66
0.66
2.56
2.56
2.56
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
25.24
14.83
0.37
2.22
Approach LOS
D
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
10.08
Intersection LOS
D
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 2 10/23/2023
Generated with SANDERSON40,
STEWAR T awe
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 89.7
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: F
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.798
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
tilt
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
iGC
101"
IC
i00.r:"
100.in:
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
n rq
r
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
32
121
119
66
107
106
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
32
121
119
66
107
106
Peak Hour Factor
0.5500
0.5500
0.4300
0A300
0.5500
0.5500
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
15
55
69
38
49
48
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
58
220
277
153
195
193
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 3 10/23/2023
Generated with SANDERSONt�
STEWARI
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
o
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.0
0.22
0.00
0.80
0.22
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.00
L.O
8.17
0.00
89.70
79.08
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
F
F
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.54
12.50
12.50
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
0.00
0.00
13.60
13.60
312.51
312.51
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
5.26
84.42
Approach LOS
A
A
F
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
31.95
Intersection LOS
F
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 4 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023
SANDERSON(®
STEWART���
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.457
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
`�
rL
�a=>
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
j
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00.00
100.00
100.00
100.01
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
" n^,
lcr)
n On
n^,
O.On,
n qn
O.Dn
nn
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
20
93
2
13
116
43
42
8
5
4
13
16
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 1
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
20
93
2
13
116
43
42
8
5
4
13
16
Peak Hour Factor
0.5100
0.5100
0.5100
0.4700
0.4700
0.4700
0.5800
0.5800
0.5800
0.6100
0.6100
0.6100
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
10
46
1
7
62
23
18
3
2
2
5
7
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
39
182
4
28
247
91
72
14
9
7
21
26
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 5 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
SANDERSON(W.
STEWAR. —
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
750
801
655
690
Degree of Utilization, x
0.30
0.46
0.14
0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
1.26
2.42
0.50
0.25
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
31.54
60.45
12.62
6.35
Approach Delay [s/veh]
9.84
11.22
9.42
8.66
Approach LOS
A
B
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
10.39
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 6 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh):
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service:
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c)
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON(®
STEWARTQ�®
16.4
C
0.235
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
11 >
Ip
o
IIII
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length (ft]
100. '"
100.00
100.2"
100.u',
106.
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
^.:
n `
p
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input (veh/h]
61
57
50
221
229
44
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips (veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
61
57
50
221
229
44
Peak Hour Factor
0.5200
0.5200
1.0000
1.0000
0.6700
0.6700
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
29
27
13
55
85
16
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
117
110
50
221
342
66
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 7 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON(ft
STEWAR,
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
p
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.24
0.16
0.04
0.00
C.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
16.39
14.51
8.27
G..0
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
C
B
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
1.91
1.91
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
47.71
47.71
3.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
15.48
1.53
0.00
Approach LOS
C
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
4.33
Intersection LOS
C
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 8 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 7: E 8th Street & School Exit
Control Type: Two-way stop
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON(ia
STEWART��
Delay (sec / veh): 14.2
Level Of Service: B
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.068
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
u�
B
1
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
i .
12.00
12.00
17_.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100,r
100.
100.00
100,r
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0 ^
a n0
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
20
180
240
33
U
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
LOOOG
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
20
180
0
240
33
0
Peak Hour Factor
0.5500
0.5500
0.7500
0.5500
0.5500
:.7500
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
_0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
9
82
0
109
15
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
36
327
436
60
0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 9 10/23/2023
Generated with 4'• SANDERSONtW,
STEWART���
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
I
I-
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.07
0.33
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
14.25
11.08
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
B
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
1.89
1.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
47.24
47.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
11.39
0.00
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
4.81
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 10 10/23/2023
Generated with 12"awagmej SANDERSON(®
STEWART°"'4
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 8: E 8th Street & School Entrance
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 8.0
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.258
Intersection Setup
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
r1
F
0
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.:
12
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100
100
100,00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
n nn,
n, -
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
211
49
33
24
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
i.00"
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.0
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
0
1.00:
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
C.
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
0
211
49
33
24
Peak Hour Factor
0.7500
0.7500
0.5500
0.5500
0.5500
0.5500
Other Adjustment Factor
OOC
1.0001
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
0
0
96
22
15
11
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
0
0
384
89
60
44
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 11 10/23/2023
Generated with ME= SANDESTEARTWART '
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
S,an
Free
Free
Flared Lane
Storage Area [veh]
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
C
o
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.26
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.00
C.?0
8.00
1.00
o.O0
o.00
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
0.00
0.:;0
0.84
0.84
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ftAn]
0.00
0.(i0
21.11
21.11
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
6.50
0.00
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
5.33
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 4: 4 AM Peak Hour (2025) 12 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON(Q
STEWART®a®
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 21.6
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: C
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.278
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
�>
<JL
t-
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00.�_
100.0
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
r, nn
0.00
^,^
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/hj
57
36
26
0
30
13
15
82
46
16
31
1
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
14.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.30
0.00
2.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
57
36
26
0
30
13
15
82
46
16
31
1
Peak Hour Factor
0.5100
0.5100
0.5100
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
0.3500
0.3500
0.3500
0.7700
0.7700
0.7700
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
28
18
13
0
12
5
11
59
33
5
10
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
112
71
51
0
47
20
43
234
131
21
40
1
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 1 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON10
STEWART���
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.28
0.16
0.07
0.00
0.11
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.02
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
21.58
20.64
17.47
16.37
14.36
9.57
7.33
0.00
8.01
Movement LOS
C
C
C
C
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
2.78
2.78
2.78
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
69.60
1 69.60
1 69.60
0.9
10.99
10.99
1.97
1.97
1 1.97
0.89
0.89
1 0.89
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
20.40
12.93
10.77
2.71
Approach LOS
C
B
IA
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
7.94
Intersection LOS
C
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 2 10/23/2023
Generated with IM
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
SANDERSON(®
STEWART�5
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 17.0
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: C
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.256
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
Il
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
10u
100.1
1 D
100.tii
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
30.00
Grade [%)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
40
80
63
31
75
75
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
40
80
63
31
75
75
Peak Hour Factor
0.6200
0.6200
0.3700
0.3700
0.6800
0.6800
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
16
32
43
21
28
28
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
65
129
170
84
110
110
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 3 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON(ft
STEWART� j
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
O.OG
0.12
0.0-
0.26
0.12
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.0=
O.00
7.82
,a
17.02
12.56
Movement LOS
A-
A
A
A
C
B
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
1.74
1.74
95th-Percentile Queue Length [firm]
0.00
0.00
7.81
7.81
43.43
43.43
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
5.23
14.79
Approach LOS
A
A
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
6.86
Intersection LOS
C
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 4 10/23/2023
Generated with _ SANDERSON(®
STEWARTs�/
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.1
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.351
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configurationu
Turning Movement
Left
IThru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
IThru
Right
I Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.00
00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.0o
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.0
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0 0
O,nn
„ ,,
n On
0.nn
0.00
n nn
n n^
r; nn
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
2
1 86
1 3
10
76
24
24
7
4
3
7
10
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.30
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 1
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
2
86
3
10
76
24
24
7
4
3
7
10
Peak Hour Factor
0.7500
0.7500
0.7500
0.3700
0.3700
0.3700
0.3400
0.3400
0.3400
0.8800
0.8800
0.8800
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1
29
1
7
51
16
18
5
3
1
2
3
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
3
115
4
27
205
65
71
21
12
3
8
11
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 5 10/23/2023
S A N D E R S O N (ft
Generated with
STEWART�
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
795
847
729
749
Degree of Utilization, x
0.15
0.35
0.14
0.03
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
0.54
1.58
0.50
0.09
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
13.51
39.62
12.40
2.27
Approach Delay [s/veh]
8.35
9.53
8.76
7.95
Approach LOS
A
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
9.06
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 6 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh):
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service:
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c):
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON(&
STEWART®
13.5
B
0.138
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
e
II �
]
u
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100
100 "•''
100.00
04C
100.n
i 00.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
O,C'
n0
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
34
47
36
212
206
27
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
5.30
4.20
0.00
4.50
6.70
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
34
47
36
212
206
27
Peak Hour Factor
0.4500
0.4500
0.8300
0.8300
1.0000
1.0000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
19
26
11
64
52
7
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
76
104
43
255
206
27
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 7 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON if•
STEWART�
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.14
0.13
0.03
0.00
o_0s
0 .-�
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
13.46
11.33
7.76
0.0:;
n 00
0 US
Movement LOS
B
B
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
1.07
1.07
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
26.70
26.70
2.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
12.23
1.12
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.57
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 8 10/23/2023
Generated with S A N DE R S O N (®
STEWART�a
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 7: E 8th Street & School Exit
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 11.4
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.036
Intersection Setup
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
>
y-
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
_.
12.00
12.00
i2.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.G
100 (i"
100
100.
100._
100.
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0."
4 '
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
14
129
144
20
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.0 ,
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
D
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
D
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
14
129
144
20
0
Peak Hour Factor
0.5700
0.5700
9.7500
0.5700
0.5700
0.7500
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
6
57
0
63
9
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
25
226
0
253
35
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 9 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON40k
STEWART�Z'Y
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
0
0
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.04
0.22
O.rO
C.00
1 07
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
11.35
9.70
u.Cu
0.00
-.00
0.00
Movement LOS
B
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
1.01
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
25.17
25.17
0 OC
0.00
0.00
O.oC
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
9.86
0.00
0.00
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
4.59
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 10 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 8: E 8th Street & School Entrance
Control Type: Two-way stop
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Intersection Setup
SANDERSON(®
STEWART69
Delay (sec / veh): 7.6
Level Of Service: A
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.125
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Sou[hi ow,
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
t J
u
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
i2.00
12.
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.00
'-1-
,,
tiiJ.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
^ D4
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
110
48
20
12
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
vi
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
00 '?
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/hj
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/hj
0
0
110
48
20
12
Peak Hour Factor
0.7500
0.7500
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1,0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
0
0
48
21
9
5
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
0
0
193
84
35
21
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 11 10/23/2023
Generated with '® SANDERSON(W-
STEWART�
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Flared Lane
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.00
0.12
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.00
7.56
0.00
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
J.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
0.00
0.00
8.99
8.99
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
5.27
0.00
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_[, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
4.38
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 5: 5 After School Peak Hour (2025) 12 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSON4®
STEWARTO
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 1: Alder Avenue & Maryland Lane
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 11.7
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.081
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
! u >
tr
s=>
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00 G
100.u"
i00.i;,
i00.0o
00.E ;
__,
- 1
�._. ,
�_.
��...
,.i��
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
7 r '
`
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes IYes
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E Maryland Lane
E Maryland Lane
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
58
33
23
0
18
7
6
36
29
8
51
1
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1 1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh[h]
58
33
23 1
0
18
7
6
36
29
8
51
1
Peak Hour Factor
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
0.6400
0.6400
0.6400
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.6000
0.6000
0.6000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
25
14
10
0
7
3
2
9
7
3
21
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
102
58
40
0
28
11
6
36
29
13
85
2
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
0
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 1 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON lW-
STEWART�
Priority Scheme
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.14
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
11.65
11.72
10.18
"0.86
10.40
8.94
7.37
0.00
0.00
7.34
Movement LOS
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
1.05
1.05
1.05
0.18
0.16
0.16
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
26.22
26.22
26.22
4.04
4.04
4.04
0.27
0.27
1 0.27
1 0.55
0.55
0.55
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
11.38
9.98
0.62
0.95
Approach LOS
B
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
6.84
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 2 10/23/2023
Generated with, SANDERSONt&
STEWART�a
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 2: Alder Avenue & E 8th Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.9
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.050
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration>
tiff
Turning Movement
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Left
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.
10C,
100.00
1al
10C.-
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0.''
4
P rn
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
55
31
27
18
38
37
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
55
31
27
18
38
37
Peak Hour Factor
0.7800
0.7800
0.8900
0.8900
0.9600
0.9600
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
18
10
8
5
10
10
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
71
40
30
20
40
39
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 3 10/23/2023
Generated with = 'R!I' ®,
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON (f
STEWART��
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Stop
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.04
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.00
0.00
7.47
9.89
9.13
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.30
0.30
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/In]
0.00
0.00
1.27
1.27
7.41
7.41
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
0.00
4.48
9.52
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
4.07
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 4 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023
SANDERSON(.
STEWARTS'J
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 3: Alder Avenue & E 6th Street
Control Type: All -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 7.5
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.110
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
Turning Movement
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
j
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
ti
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
00.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
i00.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
rr
i.0o
r.00
0.0n
Speed [mph]
25.00
15.00
25.00
25.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
No
No
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
Alder Avenue
E 6th Street
E 6th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
8
71
8
5
32
17
12
13
3
6
7
6
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
1 0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
8
71
8
5
32
17
12
13
3
6
7
6
Peak Hour Factor
0.9100
0.9100
0.9100
0.6800
0.6800
0.6800
0.6900
0.6900
0.6900
0.5000
0.5000
0.5000
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
2
20
2
2
12
6
4
5
1
3
4
3
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
9
78
9
7
47
25
17
19
4
12
14
12
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 5 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
Lanes
SANDERSON(ft
STEWART���
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h]
875
901
830
833
Degree of Utilization, x
0.11
0.09
0.05
0.05
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh]
0.37
0.29
0.15
0.14
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft]
9.21
7.19
3.79
3.58
Approach Delay [s/veh]
7.62
7.38
7.56
7.53
Approach LOS
A
A
A
A
Intersection Delay [s/veh]
7.52
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 6 10/23/2023
Generated with ]' SANDERSONt®
.;.
STEWART®��
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 4: Alder Avenue & E Main Street
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 13.6
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: B
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.038
Intersection Setup
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
ll
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
1
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.
1OCIP,
100.00
1 0'1
100.00
100.u:i
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
0 '
n On
0.1
Speed [mph]
30.00
30.00
30.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
No
No
Volumes
Name
Alder Avenue
E Main Street
E Main Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
17
23
39
283
355
37
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.60
0.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh[h]
17
23
39
283
355
37
Peak Hour Factor
1.0000
1.0000
0.8100
0.8100
0.9400
0.9400
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
4
6
12
87
94
10
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
17
23
48
349
378
39
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 7 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON (.
STEWART� j
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Yes
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
1
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.04
0.04
0.04
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
13.63
11.01
8.26
Movement LOS
B
B
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln]
0.24
0.24
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [It/In]
5.91
5.91
3.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
12.12
1.00
0.00
Approach LOS
B
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay (s/veh]
1.03
Intersection LOS
B
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 8 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8
SANDERSONlW,
STEWART��a
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 7: E 8th Street & School Exit
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.4
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.008
Intersection Setup
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
t u 3
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
12.00
12.00
2.0U
12.00
12.00
2.t
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
i00.00
100.
100.C:
100.0.:
100.u'„
100_'
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
_,
0.0
0.0
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Exit
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
5
46
0
58
29
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.00-'
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.0:
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.001
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
C,
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
5
46
0
58
29
0
Peak Hour Factor
0.7200
0.7200
0.9200
0.7200
0.7200
0.9200
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
2
16
0
20
10
0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
7
64
0
81
40
0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 9 10/23/2023
Generated with
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSONi&
STEWART�+�
Priority Scheme
Stop
Free
Free
Flared Lane
No
Storage Area [veh]
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
No
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.01
0.06
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
9.38
8.76
0.00
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [vehAn]
0.23
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
5.64
5.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
8.82
0.00
0.00
Approach LOS
A
A
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
3.26
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 10 10/23/2023
Generated with SANDERSONt®
STEWART���
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Intersection 8: E 8th Street & School Entrance
Control Type: Two-way stop Delay (sec / veh): 7.4
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition Level Of Service: A
Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.035
Intersection Setup
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Approach
Eastbound
Westbound
Lane Configuration
_1
u
Turning Movement
Left
Right
Left
Thru
Thru
Right
Lane Width [ft]
1�.
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Entry Pocket Length [ft]
100.
100.Go
100
100.
iOC.
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exit Pocket Length [ft]
n,
Speed [mph]
15.00
15.00
Grade [%]
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crosswalk
Yes
Yes
Yes
Volumes
Name
School Entrance
E 8th Street
E 8th Street
Base Volume Input [veh/h]
0
39
24
29
4
Base Volume Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.006•
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Growth Factor
1 ncriO
1.000r'
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
In -Process Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Site -Generated Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Diverted Trips [veh/h]
0
r
0
0
0
0
Pass -by Trips [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Other Volume [veh/h]
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
0
39
24
29
4
Peak Hour Factor
0.9200
0.9200
0.7200
0.7200
0.7200
0.7200
Other Adjustment Factor
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
0
0
14
8
10
1
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
0
0
54
33
40
6
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
0
0
0
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 11 10/23/2023
Generated with =VFW
Version 2023 (SP 0-8)
Intersection Settings
SANDERSON (G
STEWART�+�
Priority Scheme
Free
Free
Flared Lane
Storage Area [veh]
0
Two -Stage Gap Acceptance
Number of Storage Spaces in Median
0
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio
0.03
".00
0.00
0.00
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
7.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Movement LOS
A
A
A
A
95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/In]
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [fUln]
2.32
2.32
0.00
0.00
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
4.57
0.00
Approach LOS
A
A
d I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
2.99
Intersection LOS
A
Scenario 6: 6 PM Peak Hour (2025) 12 10/23/2023
AUXILIARY TURN LANE &
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
ENDURING
C=?MMUNITY
DESIGN
TURN LANE WARRANTS
East Maryland Isne &
Alder Avenue
East 8th Street &
Alder Avenue
East Main Street &
Alder Avenue
East 8th Street &
Site Entrance
AM
School
PM
AM
School
PM
AM
School
PM
AM
School
PM
NB Iti t-Tum Iane
NO
NO
NO
_
NB Left -Turn Lane
SB Right -Turn Lane
SB Left -Turn Lane
NO
NO
NO
2023
EB Ri t-Tum I—
NO
NO
NO
EB aft -Turn Lane
NO
NO
NO
WB Right -Turn I—
NO
NO
I NO
I
NO
NO
NO
WB Left -Turn I—
NO
NO
NO
NB Right -Turn Lane
YES
NO
NO
NB aft -Turn Lane
SB Ri t-Tum Lane
SB Left -Turn Lane
NO
NO
NO
2025
EB Ri t-Tum I—
NO
NO
NO
EB I-eft-Tum Lane
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
WB Right -Turn Lane
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
WB Ixft-Tum Lane
NO
NO
NO
Existing Traffic Volumes (2023) - Right -Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highways
Approach
Time
Total DHV
(veh/hr)
Right -Turn Volume
During DHV
(veh/hr, one direction)
Required Right -Turn
Volume for
Warranted Lane
Warranted Right -
Turn Lane?
(Y/N)
AM weekday
105
38
106
N
Alder & Maryland EB
School weekday
111
20
105
N
PM weekday
59
19
112
N
AM weekday
98
3
107
N
Alder & Maryland WB
School weekday
34
1
115
N
PM weekday
53
1
113
N
AM weekday
44
14
114
N
8th & Alder NB
School weekday
62
24
112
N
PM weekday
62
10
112
N
AM weekday
235
19
89
N
Main & Alder WB
School weekday
208
14
92
N
PM weekday
366
31
71
N
Speed Limit at
Approach
Adjustment
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
25
0
35
0
35
0
35
0
Future Traffic Volumes (20251- Rieht-Turn Lanes at Unsienalized Intersections on 2-Lane Highway!
Approach
Time
Total DHV
(veh/hr)
Right -Turn Volume
During DHV
(veh/hr, one direction)
Required Right -Turn
Volume for
Warranted Lane
Warranted Right -
Turn Lane?
(Y/N)
AM weekday
158
87
119
N
Alder & Maryland EB
School weekday
143
46
121
N
PM weekday
71
29
111
N
AM weekday
127
3
103
N
Alder & Maryland WB
School weekday
48
1
114
N
PM weekday
60
1
112
N
AM weekday
153
121
120
Y
8th & Alder NB
School weekday
120
80
124
N
PM weekday
86
31
109
N
AM weekday
273
44
104
N
Main & Alder WB
School weekday
233
27
89
N
PM weekday
392
37
68
N
AM weekday
57
24
112
N
8th & Site WB
School weekday
32
12
116
N
PM weekday
33
4
116
N
Speed Limit at
Approach Adjustment
25 20
25 20
25 0
25 0
25 0
25 0
25 20
25 20
25 0
35 20
35 0
35 0
25 0
25 0
25 0
m
100
3[ 80
O
I
a =
W
60
O
U
1`=
r
x
_2
w 40
20
0
Guidelines for Right -Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections
on 2-Lane Hiehways (FiEUre 28.4A)
® Existing (2023)
® Future (2025)
RIGHT iuRN LANE MAY
BE JUSTIFIED
_.._..... .. .... —
--
—.. - --
RIGHT
-TURN LANE
MAY
NOT BE JUSTIFIED
100 200 300 400 Soo
TOTAL DHV, VEHICLES PER HOUR, IN ONE DIRECTION
600 700
Fvictir TmfFir Vnlvrnes 170731 - Lek -Turn Lanes at Unsienalized Intersections on 2-Lane Hiehways
Approach
Time
Va =Total advancing
trafficvolume
Val= Total left -turn
volume in advancing
traffic
Percent left -turns in
Va
Vo =Total opposing
traffic volume
Warranted Left-
Turn Lane?
(Y/N)
AM weekday
105
8
7.6%
98
N
Alder & Maryland EB
School weekday
ill
14
12.6%
34
N
PM weekday
59
6
10.2%
53
N
AM weekday
98
12
12.2%
1 105
N
Alder&Maryland WB
School weekday
34
4
11.8%
ill
N
PM weekday
53
4
7.5%
59
N
AM weekday
75
13
17.3%
44
N
r.Ih & Alder SB
School weekday
37
8
21.6%
62
N
PM weekday
25
8
32.0%
62
N
Speed
Limit at
Approach
Future Traffic Volumes f20251- Left -Turn Lanes at Unsienalized Intersections on 2-lane Hiehways
Approach
Time
Va =Total advancing
traffic volume
Val=Total left -turn
volume in advancing
traffic
Percent left-tums in
Va
Vo =Total opposing
traffic volume
Warranted Left-
Turn Lane?
(Y/N)
AM weekday
158
8
5.1%
127
N
Alder & Maryland EB
School weekday
143
15
10.5%
48
N
PM weekday
71
6
8.5%
60
N
AM weekday
127
36
28.3%
158
N
Alder & Maryland WB
School weekday
48
16
33.3%
143
N
PM weekday
60
8
13.3%
71
N
AM weekday
185
119
64.3%
153
N
8th&Alder SB
School weekday
94
63
67.0%
120
N
PM weekday
45
27
60.0%
86
N
AM weekday
260
211
81.2%
57
N
8th & Site EB
School weekday
158
110
69.6%
32
N
PM we
63
39
61.9%
33
N
Speed
Limit at
Approach
Volume Guidelines for Left -Turn Lanes at Unsignalized
tlao 1: _ 60c 'ons Op 2-1_a a High�iays (4 MPH) Figure 48.4F)
VA = TOW advarhd p
kaflc volume vhthtd
Indudes a turrtrhp
Vp = Told appowIrq
&dfc vdmw wtdch
ndudes ell UT&V
traffic
Existing (2023)
O Future (2025)
IrrtruCtlorhe:
1. The Tasrhfy d wrnes ropreoard the parosnt d bR throe
n the advarhdrhp voMrrhs Av The deelpror shw id bate
to Carve for the ackof perostttepe Of Istt urrha
When this Is not an even khaemad of fve, rie
deakpw should eW wW vrtwo the curve Ise.
2 Read VA and Vp nb the dart and beets the kksrssdbn
of the boo vol rrne.
& Note the I , -I of the pdnt n-2 reladva b ow save n
-1. t the pdnt Is brie "d the curve. therh a Ieeaurh
Ism a xxM be mrhdde ed. If the poet Is b the let of
rie curve. rien a Iefk m lathe Is not vrarrarded based an
VvIlb volumes.
700 O00
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
East Main Street & Alder Avenue
Existing Conditions
2023
Future
2025
1. Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume
x
x
2. Four -Hour Vehicular Volume
x
x
3. Peak Hour
x
x
4. Pedestrian Volume
5. School Crossing
6. Coordinated Signal System
x
x
7. Crash History
x
x
B. Roadway Network
x
x
9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
--
--
Signals Warranted
Yes
No
x
x
Warrant 1: Eiaht-Hour Vehicular Volume
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Analvsis Year/Case:
Sanderson Stewart
9/20/2023
23103
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
City of Laurel/MDT
35 mph
East Main St (1 lane)
Alder Ave (1 lane)
Hour
Begin
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
NB
SB
EB
WB
0:00
0
2
7
12
19
2
1:00
0
0
8
10
18
0
2:00
0
0
7
6
13
0
3:00
0
3
4
16
20
3
4:00
0
7
19
24
43
7
5:00
0
19
28
66
94
19
6:00
0
25
97
103
200
25
7:00
0
55
187
210
397
55
8:00
0
42
192
188
380
42
9:00
0
22
151
167
318
22
10:00
0
33
159
143
302
33
11:00
0
31
172
174
346
31
12:00
0
22
180
196
376
22
13:00
0
27
167
206
373
27
14:00
0
46
199
238
437
46
15:00
0
32
194
241
435
32
16:00
0
28
242
297
539
28
17:00
0
30
296
367
663
30
18:00
0
33
162
243
405
33
19:00
0
21
161
155
316
21
20:00
0
7
114
106
220
7
21:00
0
6
68
76
144
6
22:00
0
4
36
39
75
4
23:00
0
2
18
20
38
2
TOTAL
1 0
497
2868
3303
6171
497
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (70% Columns):
Major Street Total >350 and Higher Minor Street Total > 105 for 8 hours?
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (70% Columns):
Major Street Total > 525 and Higher Minor Street Total > 53 for 8 hours?
Combination of Conditions A & B (56% Columns):
Major Street Total > 280 and 1-ligher Minor Street Total > 84 for 8 hours?
Major Street Total > 420 and Higher Minor Street Total > 42 for 8 hours?
Warrant 1 Satisfied?
Hrs
No 0
No 0
No 0
No
No
1
Warrant 1: Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number: 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
jurisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit: 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Future (2025)
Hour
Begin
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
NB
SB
EB
WB
0:00
0
3
8
13
21
3
1:00
0
0
9
11
20
0
2:00
0
0
8
7
15
0
3:00
0
5
5
18
23
5
4:00
0
12
22
27
49
12
5:00
0
33
32
73
105
33
6:00
0
44
ill
114
225
44
7:00
0
96
214
233
447
96
8:00
0
73
220
209
429
73
9:00
0
38
173
185
358
38
10:00
0
58
182
159
341
58
11:00
0
54
197
193
390
54
12:00
0
38
206
218
424
38
13:00
0
47
191
229
420
47
14:00
0
80
228
264
492
80
15:00
0
56
222
268
490
56
16:00
0
49
277
330
607
49
17:00
0
52
339
407
746
52
18:00
0
58
185
270
455
58
19:00
0
37
184
172
356
37
20:00
0
12
130
118
248
12
21:00
0
10
78
84
162
10
22:00
0
7
41
43
84
7
23:00
0
3
21
22
43
3
TOTAL
0 1
865
3283
3667 1
6950
865
Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume (70% Columns):
Major Street Total >350 and Higher Minor Street Total > 105 for 8 hours? No
Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic (70% Columns):
Major Street Total > 525 and Higher Minor Street Total > 53 for 8 hours? No
Combination of Conditions A & B (56% Columns):
Major Street Total > 280 and Higher Minor Street Total > 84 for 8 hours? No
Major Street Total > 420 and Higher Minor Street Total > 42 for 8 hours? No
Warrant 1 Satisfied? No
Firs
0
Warrant 2: Four -Hour Vehicular Volume
Date:
Project Number:
Project Description:
Jurisdiction:
Major Street Speed Limit:
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Analysis Year/Case:
Sanderson Stewart
9/20/2023
23103
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
City of Laurel/IVIDT
35 mph
East Main St (1 lane)
Alder Ave (1 lane)
Hour
Begin
Avg. Entering Volume
Major Street
Total (Both
Approaches)
Higher Volume
Minor
Approach
NB
SB
EB
WB
0:00
0
2
7
12
19
2
1:00
0
0
8
10
18
0
2:00
0
0
7
6
13
0
3:00
0
3
4
16
1 20
3
4:00
0
7
19
24
43
7
5:00
0
19
28
66
94
19
6:00
0
25
97
103
200
25
7:00
0
55
187
210
397
55
8:00
0
42
192
188
380
42
9:00
0
22
151
167
318
22
10:00
0
33
159
143
302
33
11:00
0
31
172
174
346
31
12:00
0
22
180
196
376
22
13:00
0
27
167
206
373
27
14:00
0
46
199
238
437
46
15:00
0
32
194
241
435
32
16:00
0
28
242
297
539
28
17:00
0
30
296
367
663
30
18:00
0
33
162
243
405
33
19:00
0
21
161
155
316
21
20:00
0
7
114
106
220
7
21:00
0
6
68
76
144
6
22:00
0
4
36
39
75
4
23:00
0
1 2
18
20
38
2
TOTAL
0
1 497
2868
3303
6171
497
Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor)
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET)
400
000
MINOR
STREET
HIGHER'
200
VOLUME
APPROACH•
VPH
too
«r.
2
OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES
2OR MORE
LANES & t LANE
t LANE d 1 LANE
.
eI*Ti.
200 MCI 400 500 600 700 60o 000 low
MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: So vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor•sueet
approach MM two or more lanes and 60 von applies as the lower
threshold volume for a rnino-110el appl-ch In one lane.
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of 4 hours (100% thresholds)? No (0 hrs)
Warrant 2 Satisfied? No
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number: 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
jurisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit: 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing (2023)
AM Peak Hour 7:30 - 8:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.19
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 457
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 64
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 521
PM Peak Hour 5:00 - 6:00 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.10
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 663
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 30
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 693
Category A: Peak Period: PM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs? No (0.10)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour? No (30)
Total entering volume > 650 for peak hour? Yes (693)
Category A warrant satisfied? No
Category B: Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3. Peak Hour (70 /o Factor)
(COMMUNITY LESSTHAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET)
F� r I
I I I �—
400 � -� 2 OR MORE LANES 8 2 OR MORE LANES
MINOR I 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE�
STREET 300 i —
HIGHER- I 1 LANE & 11 LANE
VOLUME
APPROACH- 200 i
VPH
100 100'
75-
j • �
300 400 500 600 700 Boo 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street
approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the tower
threshold volume for a minor -Street approach with one lane.
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (70% thresholds)? No
Warrant 3 Satisfied? No
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number: 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
jurisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit: 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/ Future (2025)
AM Peak Hour 7:30 - 8:30 AM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.40
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 544
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 118
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 662
PM Peak Hour 5:00 - 6:00 PM
High Minor Total Stopped Time Delay (hrs) 0.13
Total Volume of Major Approaches (vehs) 714
High Minor Approach Volume (vehs) 40
Total Entering Volume (vehs) 754
Category A: Peak Period: AM
Total stopped time delay for minor approach > 4 veh-hrs?
No (0.40)
High minor approach volume > 100 for peak hour?
Yes (118)
Total entering volume > 650 for peak hour?
Yes (662)
Category A warrant satisfied?
No
Category B: Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3. Peak Hour (70% Factor)
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET)
-000 2 MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES —
iR
MINOR 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
STREET 30o f--'
HIGHER- i I 1 IANE & it LANE
VOLUME
APPROACH-VPH 200
I
100 I
100-
75'
300 400 500 600 700 Soo 900 1000 1100 1200
1300
MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume fora minor -street
approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane.
Meets warrant criteria on graph for minimum of one hour (70% thresholds)?
No
Warrant 3 Satisfied?
No
Warrant 4: Pedestrian Volume
General Information
Agency/Company:
Sanderson Stewart
Date:
9/20/2023
Project Number:
23103
Project Description:
Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
jurisdiction:
City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit-.
35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes):
East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes):
Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year Case:
Future 2025
This warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians
experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.
K
Major Street
Total Traffic
Pedestrian Volume
Cross' Major Street
21
0
20
0
15
0
3:00
23
0
4:00
49
0
5:00
105
0
6:00
225
0
7:00
447
0
8:00
429
0
9:00
358
0
10:00
341
0
11:00
390
0
12:00
424
0
13:00
420
0
14:00
492
0
15:00
490
0
16:00
607
0
17:00
746
0
18:00
455
0
19:00
356
0
20:00
248
0
21:00
162
0
22:00
84
0
23:00
43
0
TOTAL
6,950
0
Warrant 4 Satisfied? N/A
Figure 4CS. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four -Hour Volume
spD
47J
TOTAL OF ALL
PEDESTRIANS 300
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET -
PEDESTRIANS 200
PER HOUR (PPH)
too
Nri®! N
300
0A
400 SW 600 700 600 9D3 1000 1100 1200 1300 14M
MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 107 pph apphe6 ebthe I—IhrebhM Vdurhe.
Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour
700
TOTAL OF ALL ................. ....... L .—_ ..__......._
_ I I
PEDESTRIANS
CROSSING
MAJOR STREET-
PEDESTRIANS 300 ? I
PER HOUR (PPH) z00
_
300 C00 500 600 700 1100 900 1000 11001200 1300 14W 1500 1600 17M 18n
MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
For each of any 4 hours of an average day, do the plotted points representing
representing the vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding
pedestrians per hour crossing the major street fall above the curve in
Figure 4C-5? N/A
For 1 hour of an average day, does the plotted point representing vehicles per
hour on the major street and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing
the major street fall above the curve in Figure 4C-7? N/A
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number. 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
urisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit: 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case. Existing 2023
Warrant 5: School Crossing
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period? N/A
Do' 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour? No
Warrant 5 Satisfied? N/A
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation? No
Warrant 6 Satisfied? No
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency? N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period? No
Is Condition A criterion met for 56% columns of Warrant 1 met? No
Is Condition B criterion met for 56% columns of Warrant 1 met? No
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
No
Warrant 7 Satisfied? No
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number: 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
urisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Future 2025
Warrant 5: School Crossing
This warrant is intended for application where the fact that school children (elementary through high school
students) cross the major street is the principle reason to consider installing a traffic signal. This warrant shall
not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less
than 300 feet, unless it can be shown that the proposed traffic signal would not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
Is the number of adequate gaps in the major crossing traffic steam during the primary crossing
period less than the number of minutes in that crossing period? N/A
Do 20 or more students cross at this location during the highest crossing hour? No
Warrant 5 Satisfied? N/A
Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal would help to provide proper
platooning of vehicles and therefore provide progressive movement in a coordinated signal system.
Are any adjacent traffic signals located so far away that they do not provide a necessary degree of
platooning and/or progressive operation? No
Warrant 6 Satisfied? No
Warrant 7: Crash Experience
This warrant is intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to
consider installing a traffic control signal
Have adequate trials of alternatives failed to reduce the crash frequency? N/A
Have 5 or more crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a signal, occurred within a 12-month
period? No
Is Condition A criterion met for 56% columns of Warrant 1 met? No
Is Condition B criterion met for 56% columns of Warrant 1 met? No
Are observed pedestrian volumes equal to or greater than 80% of what is required for Warrant 4?
No
Warrant 7 Satisfied? No
General Information
Agency/Company: Sanderson Stewart
Date: 9/20/2023
Project Number. 23103
Project Description: Laurel - New 3rd-5th Elementary School
jurisdiction: City of Laurel/MDT
Major Street Speed Limit. 35 mph
Major Street (Approach Lanes): East Main St (1 lane)
Minor Street (Approach Lanes): Alder Ave (1 lane)
Analysis Year/Case: Existing 2023
Warrant 8: Roadway Network
This warrant is intended for application where installation of a traffic signal could be justified in order to
encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network
Do two or more of the intersecting routes at this location have at least one of the following
characteristics:
A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway
network for through traffic flow; or
B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or
C. It appears as a major route on an official plan.
Yes
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of a least
1000 vehicles during a weekday typical peak hour and have a 5-year projected traffic volume that
meets one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday? No
Does this intersection have an existing or immediately projected total entering volume of at least
1000 vph for each of any 5 hours of a Saturday or Sunday? N/A
Warrant 8 Satisfied? No
Warrant 9: Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
This warrant is intended for application where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal
warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled
by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal.
Does a grade crossing exist on an approach controlled by a STOP Or YIELD sign whereby the
center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop or yield line?
No
Figure 4C.9. Warrant 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
(Ono Approach lane at the Track Crossing)
stp
MINORSTREET. _
CROSSING e. roq n o_�
APPROACH- q
EQUIVALENT do .._...e. ............. ..
VPW- roq rn
LL
fpq
.... :...
D - tW I00 ]00 Of `AJ BOa ]00 .BD]
MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES —VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
• zs �Pn.cetes as s,s w.r m�et,on wt,m
••VPH.ftwa M,WI aAml—$ to Ywc n Tibigs 4G24C3. u w4". it appre"s
During the highest traffic volume hour during which the rail traffic uses the crossing, does the
plotted point representing vehicles per hour on the major street and the corresponding vehicles
per hour on the minor -street approach that crosses the track fall above the applicable curve in
Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 (whichever is applicable) for the existing combination of approach lanes
over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance? N/A
Warrant 9 Satisfied? N/A
C l4tov4 M M U N I TY