The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil Workshop Minutes 03.18.2025MINUTES CITY OF LAUREL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 2025 A Council Workshop was held in Council Chambers and called to order by Mayor Dave Waggoner at 6:31 p.m. on March 18, 2025. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: _x_ Tom Canape Heidi Sparks _x_ Michelle Mize _x_ Jessica Banks _x_ Casey Wheeler _x Iry Wilke _x_ Richard Klose _x_ Jodi Mackay OTHERS PRESENT: Brittney Harakal, Administrative Assistant Kurt Markegard, CAO Forrest Sanderson, LURA Coordinator Cami Story, LURA Chair Cheryl Hill, LURA Member CAO Markegard announced the recent passing of former City Council Member, Mayor, and public servant Mark Mace. Mr. Mace served on the Council from 2000 to 2013. He was Mayor from 2013 to 2017. He also worked for the Billings Public Works Department for over 30 years. His service will be next Thursday, March 27th° at 10:00 a.m. at the Yellowstone National Cemetery. He was a Vietnam Vet, a member of the American Legion, and served in the Color Guard. He will be buried with military honors. Public Input: There were none. General Items Executive Review 1. Planning: Resolution - Resolution Of City Council Approving Final Annexation, Right -Of -Way Dedications, And Zoning For Approximately One Acre Of Property Adjacent To The City Of Laurel, As An Addition To The City Of Laurel, Yellowstone County, Montana. This process started four years ago. The Contracted Planner started this process, this is the final step of this project. Forrest Sanderson, Contract Planner, reviewed the items listed in the resolution, see attached. There were no questions by the Council. 2. Planning: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Approving The Expedited Subdivision Application For The Mclelland Subdivision. Kurt Markegard, CAO, reviewed his staff report for the McLelland subdivision. Forrest Sanderson, Contract Planner, also reviewed this report and approved that it is consistent with regulations and MCA. Doug Pizoldt, Sanbell, was the professional surveyor who oversaw this project. It was questioned if this property was located next to the church. It was clarified this property is located just to the east of the church. Services are already in the area and will not need to be extended. 3. Mayor: Resolution - A Resolution Of The City Council Authorizing The Mayor To Reschedule City Council Meeting Set On Election Day. This resolution was pulled from the agenda. Council Issues 4. LURA Update Forrest Sanderson, LURA Coordinator, reviewed the attached report from Triple Tree. The initial plan was to go to bid on phase 1 for this spring; however, some items have brought a hold on this project. First the project is at 10% design completion; in hurrying to finish the project, there may be errors. Second there are major events that take place in Downtown. And lastly there may be a delay in getting DOT permitting. So LURA has recommended shifting gears and holding this project over and including phase 2 for next year. This gives event coordinators a year to make alternative plans, time to get permits, get a more competitive bid, and a better design. Phase 2 of the project is E. Railroad Street, Bernhart Road, and S. Washington Avenue. There are no events located in this area of town. We can do our best to coordinate construction with events. Construction can also begin earlier in the year and potentially be done in the areas that affect various events. It was questioned what the estimated cost increase would be by waiting a year. It was clarified that right now, the estimate is 2.8%, however, going out for bid earlier may bring a more competitive bid. We should have the engineer's estimate soon. Choosing to hold the project for an additional year also allows the City to apply for a grant for this project. It was questioned if phase 2 could be completed this year. It was clarified that phase 2 would not be designed and ready to go to bid until August, so it would not be a possibility. It was questioned if there would be congestion issues if all streets were closed at the same time. It was clarified that street closures will be planned to accommodate as many events and keep congestion to a minimum. Council was updated that the State has pushed the W. Railroad project out to 2028. Other Items Attendance at Upcoming Council Meeting Announcements The council workshop adjourned at 7:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, AA�1— C--�' lka'40'a Brittney Harak Administrative Assistant NOTE: This meeting is open to the public. This meeting is for information and discussion of the Council for the listed workshop agenda items. RESOLUTION NO. R.25- RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING FINAL ANNEXATION, RIGHT- OF-WAY DEDICATIONS, AND ZONING FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, AS AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LAUREL, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, MONTANA. WHEREAS, a Petition for Annexation and Concurrent Zoning Designation was submitted to the City of Laurel by Lance Hull, who is the property owner (hereinafter "Petitioner") of certain real property situated in Yellowstone County, Montana; WHEREAS, the real property is generally described as that portion of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., Yellowstone County, Montana, on Certificate of Survey No. 1642 amended Parcel A 1 Less Herman Addition., Yellowstone County, Montana. The real property is generally reflected on the Exhibits to the Petition for Annexation, included as part of previously -approved Resolution No. R22-40, which is incorporated by reference herein, and it includes all contiguous roadways and rights -of -way; WHEREAS, the Petitioner sought annexation of the property and zoning as Residential Multiple Family (hereinafter "RMF"); WHEREAS, Petitioner sought annexation of the property into the City of Laurel in order to access and utilize City of Laurel services, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, police, and fire; WHEREAS, the Laurel City -County Planning Board held a duly advertised public hearing on Petitioner's Petition for Annexation and Concurrent Approval of Initial Zoning Designation on June 15, 2022; WHEREAS, at the the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Board voted to recommend approval to the City Council of both the annexation and zoning request; WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing regarding Petitioner's Petition for Annexation on August 9, 2022; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council determined that approval of the Petition for Annexation and Concurrent Approval of Initial Zoning Designation was in the best interests of the City at this time; WHEREAS, the annexation of the property and zoning is subject to an Annexation Agreement by and between the City of Laurel and the Petitioner, which was executed by and between the Petitioner and the City of Laurel and was attached to Resolution No. R22-40 and thereto incorporated as part of the Resolution; R25- Final Annexation of One Acre Parcel (Hull Property), as an Addition to the City of Laurel, and Related Rights -of -Way and Zoning WHEREAS, the Property Owner has complied with all of the terms and conditions of annexation imposed by the Laurel City Council; WHEREAS, all public water, sewer, streetways, and storm drainages have been extended by the Property Owner and approved by the Laurel Public Works Department; WHEREAS, all rights -of -way have been dedicated to the City of Laurel; WHEREAS, a Waiver of Right of Protest has been finalized, and the Development Agreement has been executed and all appropriate and necessary work completed; and WHEREAS, the City is prepared to accept the right-of-way dedications as demonstrated on the Plat Exhibit, approve the Final Annexation of the property and all rights -of -way as demonstrated on the Plat Exhibit; and assign the zoning on the property as RMF. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel, Montana, as follows: The owner of record of the territory annexed to the City of Laurel has executed a Petition of Annexation. 2. Pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. § 7-2-46, the incorporated boundaries of the City of Laurel shall be and the same hereby is extended and/or expanded to include the territory described in Petitioner's Petition for Annexation and all attached Exhibits. 3. The following described territory is hereby annexed to the City of Laurel: that portion of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 24 East, P.M.M., Yellowstone County, Montana, on Certificate of Survey No. 1642 amended Parcel Al Less Herman Addition., Yellowstone County, Montana. The real property is generally reflected on the Exhibits to the Petition for Annexation, which is incorporated by reference herein, and it includes all contiguous roadways and rights -of -way. 4. The owner of record of the territory annexed to the City of Laurel and the City of Laurel have executed an Annexation Agreement, which terms and conditions have been met by the property owner and which are made a part of this Resolution and the Petition for Annexation. 5. That the conditions of the annexation and zoning, as conditioned as follows, have been met: A. On all terms, conditions, and requirements of the Annexation Agreement between the City of Laurel and Petitioner. R25- Final Annexation of One Acre Parcel (Hull Property), as an Addition to the City of Laurel, and Related Rights -of -Way and Zoning B. The property shall be zoned as RMF, which is consistent with the zoning of adjacent and nearby properties. C. The Waiver of Right to Protest, a copy of which is attached to Resolution No. 22-40 and incorporated by reference herein, and this Resolution, shall be recorded with the County Clerk and Recorder within ninety (90) days after the adoption of this Resolution. D. Connections to the City of Laurel Water and Sewer Systems have been approved by the City of Laurel's Public Works Department. E. All improvements and infrastructure connections have been completed. 6. This Resolution shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the City Council, and upon said incorporation, the City Clerk -Treasurer shall file a true and correct certified copy of this Resolution and Meeting Minutes with the Yellowstone County Clerk and Recorder. 7. From and after the date that the City Clerk -Treasurer files such certified copy of this Resolution and of the City Council Meeting Minutes with the Yellowstone County Clerk and Recorder, this Annexation of the above - described territory to the City of Laurel shall be deemed complete and final. 8. Annexation and the City's responsibility for providing service to the property shall become null and void upon Petitioner's failure to satisfy the conditions imposed by the City Council by and through this Resolution, the Petition for Annexation, and the Annexation Agreement by and between the City of Laurel and the Petitioner. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of March, 2025, by Council Member PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Laurel the day of March, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor the day of March, 2025. CITY OF LAUREL Dave Waggoner, Mayor R25- Final Annexation of One Acre Parcel (Hull Property), as an Addition to the City of Laurel, and Related Rights -of -Way and Zoning ATTEST: Kelly Strecker, Clerk -Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michele L. Braukmann, Civil City Attorney R25- Final Annexation of One Acre Parcel (Hull Property), as an Addition to the City of Laurel, and Related Rights -of -Way and Zoning LAUREL CGfY-00U-j'\,9TY LA6,INfV?!G DEPA TM,ENOdT Staff Review and Recommendation for approval McLelland Subdivision TO: Laurel City Council FROM: Kurt Markegard Forrest Sanderson` �S RE: Expedited 2-Lot subdivision DATE: March 13, 2025 ✓s Y : °-- ri ,$ 4 3'�,�. `'� -c :Y �" e p a C y � E T` �.. ; p v;y.QP 014 �: y�^a .ar . • ry - "yA {�..: r j -°1 4d 9_r 1 A� i . r �nRX An expedited 2-lot minor subdivision application and a document packet was submitted by Sanbell on behalf of Leonard McLelland. The proposed 2 lot subdivision is located on East Maryland Lane and Alder Avenue with an address for the existing house of 708 East Maryland Lane. The legal description is Tract B1-AI of Amended Tract B1-A of COS 2385 and consists of 2.094 acres. The subdivision is located within the Laurel -Yellowstone City -County Planning Jurisdiction and the City of Laurel City Limits. The subdivision qualifies for expedited review under the Laurel subdivision regulations and is constant with the Laurel Growth Policy. The applicant has provided all the supporting subdivision elements as per Appendix H of the Laurel -Yellowstone County Subdivision Regulations. The documents provided by the applicant were deemed sufficient by the planning office and reviewed by the City's contracted planner. Owner: Leornard McLelland Legal Description: Tract B1-Al of amended Tract B1-A of COS 2385 Subdivision size: 2.09 Acres Existing Land Use: Residential Limited Multi- Family Proposed Land Use: Residential Limited Multi -Family ® Subdivision Pre -application meeting on December 12, 2024 ® Subdivision Application completed on January 28, 2025 ® All submitted information was forwarded to County Departments on February 7, 2025 ® Comments received back from County Departments on March 11, 2025 ® City Council Workshop on 17, 2025 o City Council Meeting Consideration on March 25, 2025 1 �,�' •ir1 ' ��" Ir�y�� "� r��j�� •.�` �,�i'��',. J'��S_��+�h�". ,�n. _,»r�r��4�'��*.�'�: 'R ,_ �*.''k��ls'_:9?- - 1. The Owner's representatives have submitted an Expedited Subdivision Application and supporting documents. 2. The Application was found to contain all the necessary elements. 3. The Application and its supporting documentation were routed to all city and county departments 4. The expedited subdivision application contains a. The plat of McLelland Subdivision with two lots b. Subdivision Improvement Agreement c. Subdivision Guarantee d. DEQ Municipal Facilities Exclusion e. Declaration of Reciprocal Private Access f. Waiver of Right to Protest g. Vacation of Easement for water line h. Existing COS. 5. Agriculture Impacts. a. There are no agriculture impacts as this subdivision is within the City of Laurel and zoned as a residential use. 6. Agricultural water user facilities Impacts. a. No water rights have been conferred to the subdivider or future owners of the lots within the subdivision. b. Existing irrigation and other related water user facilities shall not be changed or modified from their current use. 7. Local Services Impacts. a. Fire Service will be provided by the Laurel Volunteer Fire Department (Laurel Fire District). b. Law Enforcement shall be provided by the Laurel Police Department. c. The property is within the Laurel School District. d. The proposed roadways and improvements for existing roadways within and adjacent to the proposed Subdivision will not create a burden for roadway maintenance. 8. Natural Environment Impacts a. The area of the proposed subdivision exists for residential use already. b. The applicant has prepared the subdivision design to adequately protect water quality and will not be installing septic systems but will connect to city water and sewer services. 9. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Impacts a. The proposed Subdivision contains no known protected species or those with special status. b. The subdivision is located within the Laurel City Limits. 2 10. Public health & Safety Impacts a. The water and wastewater system connections will have to be approved by the Public Works Director b. The subdivision has been designed to ensure no impact arises for the subdivision or surrounding property regarding water and/or wastewater. NG8 XREVIEW ClZ1T)E:RI� �' s= LMC 16.03,110 Part F states: Governing Body Action. At a regularly scheduled meeting, the AGB shall consider the following information in deciding whether to approve or deny a final plat: 1.The effect on agriculture, agricultural water user facilities, local services, the natural environment, wildlife and wildlife habitat, and public health and safety (MCA § 76-3-608 (3)(a)); 2. Consistency with the adopted Growth Policy and Bike/Ped Plan; and 3. These subdivision regulations. 4. The governing body shall give due weight and consideration to the subdivider's expressed preferences (MCA § 76-3-608(5)(b)). The governing body may not deny approval of a subdivision based solely on the subdivision's impacts on educational services (MCA § 76-3- 608(1)), or based solely on compliance with the Growth Policy (MCA §76-3-605(2)(b)). 5. In the event the governing body denies the final plat, it shall send a letter to the subdivider stating the reasons for the denial along with written findings of fact (MCA § 76-3-608(4)). 6. After all required signatures have been obtained; the plat shall be recorded with the county clerk and recorder within twelve (12) months of the date of approval. • � �' � �' ' �� t �� ' ,� ` �,`�� - z"? dig �{�'' � a % 0 �i�..� �,; _ �� t � �`;; Staff recommends that the Laurel City Council approves the expedited subdivision to be known as McLelland Subdivision, 1. The applicant has 12 months to receive all signatures required for the subdivision plat, SIA, and supporting documents to be recorded with the County Clerk and Recorder. 1. Application Form for expedited review. 2. Redline Copy of Subdivision Plat 3. Comments from City and County departments 4. Subdivision Improvements Agreement 5. DEQ sanitation exclusion 6. Subdivision Guarantee 7. Copy of Amended tract of 131-A COS 2385 8. Vacation of Easement Document 9. Reciprocal Easement Document 10. Concept of Subdivision 11. Pre -application Form 4 iL E Rr," r lour ;ryuJi ✓w. �d Project: LURA Sidewalks Project Objective: 10% Review Meeting Date: 3/10/2025 Time: 11:00 AM Discussion Items (Items below in Red were added to the agenda to develop these Minutes) 1. Task Order #2 a. LURA SURVEYS: Review draft survey for project 1. 1. Exhibit 1 includes the Draft Survey for Project 1. Submittal 2 will include a similar document for entire TIF District — October 1, 2025 1. No work is currently being performed on this item. All current work is focused on project 1. b. PROJECT 1 DESIGN The draft project survey has been completed. Exhibit includes the draft layout, showing the proposed improvements. a. Areas in green are in good condition, and not proposed for replacement at this time. i. Some sidewalk in the green areas will require removal/replacement to accommodate pull boxes for pedestrian lighting. Areas in red are proposed for replacement. i. Deteriorating sidewalk ii. Drainage issues iii. Non-ADA compliance iv. Areas where conditions vary. (Some good, some bad) 1. Based on discussions with the pedestrian lighting engineer, it is more economical to replace some additional sidewalk and trench than to bore multiple short sections. Therefore in areas where condition varies, it is proposed to replace the whole sidewalk to accommodate the pedestrian lighting project. v. Following a walkthrough of the project with Kurt Markegard, it was decided to widen the sidewalk on the east side of 2"d Avenue, north of the alley to a width of 10 feet. It was also decided to add a portion of the sidewalk along the south side of Ist Street to the project. There are some drainage issues in the alley on the east side of 2"d Avenue. Based on follow up conversations with Forrest Sanderson, there may be a future project to address these issues. Where possible the current sidewalk design will be completed with the goal of allowing alley drainage issues to be addressed in the future while minimizing re -work as much as possible. Additions are shown in Exhibit 2. 1145 Cap Road // Helena, MT 59602 // 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_031010% Meeting - Minutes.docx T'1' ["I I PLE. 1"REE Ei'-\,,1G1N'L-L1-R1N-J n 4' iii. Design Discussion Items: a. Accessibility to buildings i. At the February 3, 2025 meeting, there was discussion regarding providing ADA access to the businesses. Exhibit includes photos of examples on other projects for consideration. Following are some options for consideration by the board. ii. Options: 1. Construct sidewalk up to buildings, generally matching the existing grade at the face of the building. a. Pros: i. Less expensive ii. Less disruption to businesses b. Cons: i. Non ADA compliance to businesses ii. If businesses decide to make ADA accessible later on, some of the sidewalk installed as part of this project will need to be removed and replaced. c. It was decided by the board to proceed with Option 1. 2. Construct ADA accessible routes to every building including buildings with insets. a. Pros: i. Provides ADA accessible routes to all businesses b. Cons: i. Considerably more expensive to construct ramps, railings, curbs, walls, etc. ii. Where building insets are present, work will be occurring within the envelope of the building. iii. Concurrence from each business owner. 1. Will likely delay the project. iv. If businesses decide to make ADA accessible later on, some of the sidewalk installed as part of this project will need to be removed and replaced. 3. Construct ADA accessible routes only to buildings without insets. a. Pros: i. Provides ADA accessible routes on City sidewalks, while not performing work in private building envelopes. ii. Limits additional project expenses. b. Cons: i. Concurrence and coordination with some building owners will be required. ii. If businesses with insets decide to make ADA accessible later on, some of the sidewalk installed as part of this project will need to be removed and replaced. 1145 Cap Road // Helena, MT 59602 // 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_031010% Meeting - Minutes.docx I PL E T � E"TE E N G I N'- E R I N I] b. Street bulb outs i. Provide better ADA Ramp accessibility ii. Provide traffic calming for pedestrians iii. Protection to parked vehicles iv. Restrict turning movements for larger vehicles. v. It was decided not to install bulb outs in 11' Avenue because it is a truck route, and bulb outs may affect truck turning movements. Bulb outs are acceptable on the other streets. c. Area south of East Main Street At the last meeting, it was decided to replace the sidewalk in this area and shift south — 10 feet and include a boulevard. 1. The reason for the shift is to get the sidewalk farther away from the road to avoid snow piling up on the sidewalk. 2. We did not have this included in phase 1, and therefore didn't complete topographic survey before the snow arrived. a. We will pick up survey soon when snow piles allow, and incorporate into the design. b. There is a lot of landscaping, flowers, etc. that will need to be considered. Does board have input on the sidewalk alignment in this area? c. BNSF permitting and coordination ii. It was decided not to include this portion of the project in Phase 1 because it will delay the project. This work will be completed in Phase 2. Relocation of stormwater inlets required in some areas. i. Multiple areas where existing curb and gutter is very flat (0.2 %). Industry standard is 0.5% min. ii. May need to add stormwater infrastructure to provide proper drainage. 1. Request City stormwater asbuilts. a. The City does not have stormwater asbuilts or drawings. e. Problem areas not shown on the maps that the board knows about. i. There is an existing vault under the sidewalk on the east side of 15t Avenue. The site was visited by Kurt Markegard, Doug Tamcke, and Brad Koon after the meeting and it was decided not to perform any sidewalk work above the vault. ii. During the walkthrough with Kurt Markegard, an outdated hydrant was observed at the intersection of Main Street and Pennsylvania Street. It was decided to include a note on the plans for the Contractor to coordinate with the City when the work in this area will be performed. The City will remove and replace the hydrant at that time. iii. During the walkthrough along Main Street, laydown curbs were observed that were likely wider than they needed to be. One location is in front of the veterinary clinic, and the other is in front of Molly and Friends. Kurt will coordinate with the property owners to determine the desired widths and communicate back to TTE. 1145 Cap Road H Helena, MT 59602 H 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_031010% Meeting - Minutes.docx TRIPLE TREE ENGINEERING iv. Pedestrian Lighting a. Discuss layout. i. Exhibit 4 includes the preliminary lighting layout. ii. It was noted that the lighting engineer is working with different fixtures to lessen the number of poles. 1. The board agreed that they would like to decrease the number of poles as much as possible while meeting pedestrian lighting requirements. Would like to cut down to 4-5 per block. iii. The banners on the lights need to be high enough that the bottom of the snowflakes are at a height of 14 feet. The Snowflakes are 3 feet high. iv. Include electrical receptacles on lights at corners and mid -block up high on pole. v. Receptacles need to be live all the time, and not turn off with the lights. vi. During the walkthrough with Kurt Markegard, black steel poles supporting wires were observed intermittently along Main Street. 1. Based on a follow up conversation with Forrest, these poles are owned by the Chamber and will either be removed by them prior to the project or removed by the Contractor as part of the project. Forrest will let TTE know what is decided by the Chamber so TTE can address plans accordingly. V. Trees a. At the February 3, 2025 meeting, there was discussion about not planting any new trees, and only keeping mature trees in good health. Trees don't get taken care of. i. Is this still the direction from the board? b. This was discussed with the arborist, and he encouraged keeping as many trees as possible, and planting new trees. i. He can recommend trees that require less maintenance, but no matter the tree species, some care and maintenance will be required. ii. He asked if something could be organized to ensure care for trees. The board decided to keep existing trees that are healthy and not damaging the sidewalks, curb and gutter, or road. Unhealthy trees or trees causing damage will be removed. If trees are removed, new trees will be planted in or near that location. New trees will also be planted in locations where trees previously existed and are not in place anymore "Empty Tree Grates". Trees that require minimal watering and maintenance will be planted. 1145 Cap Road // Helena, MT 59602 // 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_0310 10% Meeting - Minutes.docx f TREE ENGINEE��I�� vi. Project 1 Design Schedule: c. BIDDING a. Topographic Survey and Base Map —Auto Cad Base Map Complete b. 10% Design —Today c. 50% Design Review — March 24, 2025 d. 95% Design — April 1, 2025 e. 100% Design — April 15, 2025 During the meeting it was discussed that MDT permitting will likely delay the project. It was discussed during the meeting to bid the MDT portion of the project as a separate schedule to allow the non -MDT portion of the project to be awarded while permitting is being finalized on the MDT portions. In follow up conversations with MDT, with the presence of stormwater infrastructure, this review will likely go to "MDT Systems Impacts" for review. The process will likely take —2 months to review, and they need to review complete plans. Also, MDT will likely require changes to the plans that could result in change orders. Based on this information, we recommend bidding the work that is not on MDT Right -of -Way separately from the work that is on MDT Right -of -Way. The design schedule will remain the same, but bidding of the MDT portion of the project will occur after approval from MDT. Exhibit2 shows the areas proposed for each bid ("Bidding Phase 1A" and "Bidding Phase 16"). ii. Following is the revised proposed/estimated bidding/construction schedule: 1. Bidding Phase 1A Advertise for Bids —April 15, 2025 2. Begin Construction Phase 1A — May 30, 2025 3. Bidding Phase 1B Advertise for Bids —June 15, 2025 4. Begin Construction Phase 1B — July 30, 2025 1145 Cap Road H Helena, MT 59602 H 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Corresponden ce\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_031010% Meeting - Minutes.docx N G IN URI N G I PL' E T R E E E L EXHIBIT 1 Draft Project 1 Survey 1145 Cap Road // Helena, MT 59602 // 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_0310 10% Meeting - Minutes.docx TRIPLE TREE FNGINFFRING EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITION REPORT Laurel Urban Renewal Agency Laurel, NIT March 2025 Table of Contents 1 REPORT SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................................1 1.2 REPORT STRUCTURE ..........................................................................................................................................3 1.2.1 Description of Existing Sidewalk..........................................................................................................3 1.2.2 Dimensions & Area..............................................................................................................................3 1.2.3 Condition Category ........................................................... .....................3 .............................................. 1.2.4 Comments............................................................................................................................................7 1.2.5 Recommendations...............................................................................................................................7 List of Appendices Appendix A — 2"d Avenue West, West Right -of -Way, Main St to Vt St Appendix B — 2"d Avenue West, East Right -of -Way, Main St to 1st St Appendix C —1st Avenue West, West Right -of -Way, Main St to 11t St Appendix D —1st Avenue West, East Right -of -Way, Main St to 152 St Appendix E —15L Avenue West, West Right -of -Way, Vt St to 3`d St Appendix F — West Main St, North Right -of -Way, 2"d Avenue to 111 Avenue Appendix G —West Main St, North Right -of -Way, 15t Avenue to Montana Avenue Appendix H — West Main St, North Right -of -Way, Montana Avenue to Colorado Avenue Appendix I — West Main St, North Right -of -Way, Colorado Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue Appendix J — West Main St, North Right -of -Way, Pennsylvania Avenue to Wyoming Avenue Appendix K — West 151 St, North Right -of -Way, 2nd Avenue to 1st Avenue REPORT SUMMARY 1.1 Project Background The City of Laurel is a small tight -knit community made up of just over 7,000 residences with another 5,000 living in the surrounding area. Laurel is located approximately 18 miles west of Billings, Montana along Interstate 90. The city boundary encompasses over 1,300 acres and contains portions of Interstate 90, BNSF Mainline and Railyards, and portions of the Yellowstone River. The city is industrial with most employment coming from a large refinery and is also home to the state's largest railyard. In 2013, the City of Laurel established the Laurel Urban Renewal Agency (LURA) to administer funding and projects within the Laurel Downtown Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District. The agency has an appointed board of commissioners who administer grant funding opportunities and future projects within the district. In December 2024 LURA hired Triple Tree Engineering to complete the following "Sidewalk Survey". The surveys intentions were to outline sidewalk and curb & gutter conditions throughout the entire TIF District and provide recommendations for replacement or repair. The following Figure shows the extents of the TIF District in reference to the Laurel City Limits. Save this portion for Figure of District Boundary 1.2 Report Structure The report will be broken down by street blocks. A "block" consists of one side of a city street from intersection to intersection. To avoid duplicate assessments, corners of sidewalk where ADA ramps are present will be included in North/South running avenues. A mid -bock alley is usually present and is often used to help distinguish locations of existing infrastructure. For example, a section of sidewalk may be described as in the "Northern Portion" of the block. Indicating that it is north of the mid -block alley. Each block will have it's own individual report including sections describing existing sidewalk, dimensions and areas, condition categories, general comments, and recommendations. At the end of each report, Exhibit A, showcases the extents and categories of existing infrastructure. Exhibit B includes photos. 1.2. ' Description of Existing Sidewalk This section of the reports provides a general description of existing sidewalk and related infrastructure within the block. It identifies whether sidewalks and curb & gutter are present and assess their overall condition. Additionally, other relevant infrastructure elements, such as stormwater infrastructure, trees, and ADA ramps, will be noted and evaluated. 1.2.2 Dimensions & Area This portion of each report gives the general guidelines (if any) that were followed when the existing sidewalk was installed. Specific information about sidewalk widths, curb & gutter dimension, consistency of such, and gutter shape are all examples of data included in this section. A table breaking down the areas of sidewalk and the length of curb & gutter (at top back of curb (TBQ) will be provided. The areas and length of the infrastructure will be separated by Condition Category. 1.2.3 Condition Category Individual blocks will have existing infrastructure categorized based as one of four categories. Blocks can have multiple of these categories and in most cases, all four are present. The categories are simply numbered from 1 to 4, with 1 being in the best condition and 4 being the worst. The following table and figures explain and show examples of each category. 3 Table 1. Category Table Existing infrastructure Classification Breakdown Condition Category Color Code Condition/Definition Usable Life/General Recommendations 1 New/Like New 15+Year Life - Leave in Place II Light Wear/Good Operational 5-15 Life Expectancy- Leave in PlaceNery Light Use Maintenance Needed Deterioration, Cracking, !II Spalling, Small Vegitation 1-5 Year Life Expectancy- Recommend Present Replacement within 5 years. Crumbling, Vegitation Growing IV Through, Doesn't Meet ADA and 0-1 Year Life Expectancy - Replace Immediately PROWAG Requirements Both sidewalk and C&G will be categorized separately although there are many cases where the conditions coincide with one another. Category I — Like New Likely replaced within the last few years. Up to current standards and no deterioration shown. 4 y i 4. w� ti Category II — Good Condition Generally good operating condition. Very little deterioration is present. 5 Category III — Poor Condition Showing signs of deterioration (Cracking, spalling, slight heaving, crumbling, vegetation, etc.). W1441�hi1M�1111.�t �:.�'.•� 'u,ww+r N111w «f +� � "1 I�:�N ��f .. .. _. _ J i Category IV — Needs Replaced Completely deteriorated and no longer functions as intended. Concrete is either missing, completely crumbled, or major heaving is present. Portions are also considered Category !V if the location doesn't meet current standards and requires replacement. .t� .,.orb � __ �- « `_ . . - �� j .• �� = - .L . o `� - '��. -_ •-- -' �'� Via.: - ��'.� " �t _ `. This section provides a general assessment of both the sidewalk and curb & gutter conditions throughout the block, including an evaluation of common issues and any trends observed. Additionally, any accessibility concerns, including compliance with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) and PROWAG (Public Right -of -Way Access Guidelines) standard, will be highlighted to ensure pedestrian safety and mobility. Kecornmendotions The final section outlines recommendations for sidewalk/curb & gutter repair, replacement, or removal based on the observed conditions. Recommendations will generally align with the assigned condition categories. Where applicable, prioritization of replacement may be included. 2 ND AVENUE WEST West Main Street to West 15t Street West Right -of -Way Location ay�gt 4 _ , _ _ _ ;r... . �+'• , to 90 V0,,,.a 1f Description of Existing S i d e w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. Stormwater inlets are present at the south and north ends. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings, parking areas, and landscaping areas. ADA ramps are present at both ends of the block. Trees and tree wells are present. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 10' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter generally follows a standard 2' in width but varies in depth and shape. Northen and southern portions of curb have rounded gutters while portions near the center have a sharp gutter shape. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown 2nd Ave - From Main St to W ist St - Westside - Block 2 Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes CategoryI 520 South ADA Ramp Category II 1,545 Throughout Category III 1,255 Throughout Category IV 550 Located in Northern Half Total 3,870 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) Notes CategoryI 19 South ADA Ramp Category II 172 Throughout Category III 112 Throughout CategoryIV 74 Located in Northern Half Total 377 * All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Category(s): I, II, III, IV. All categories are present with majority being II and III Comments: C&G conditions vary greatly throughout the block and condition tends to improve working from north to south. The northern ADA ramp is out of spec in both grade and dimensions. Curb along W 1st St is failing and falling away from the sidewalk. The sidewalk in front of the entrance to 16 2nd Ave West is in rather poor condition and is experiencing significant heaving resulting in ADA concerns. Working south, sidewalk and C&G conditions remain in Categories III and IV until reaching the mid -block alley. The southern half of the block's sidewalk and C&G is mainly categorized as I and II with exception to the approach to the parking lot at 201 W Main Street. The approach is experiencing deterioration and cracking. The ADA Ramp located at the intersection with Main Street is in like new condition. Recommendations: Most of the northern half of the block needs replacement with exception of a small portion of sidewalk and C&G. Recommend replacement of all Category III and IV portions of sidewalk and curb and C&G including northern ADA ramp. The southern half of the block is in better condition, and for the most part is not in need of replacement. Recommend replacing the concrete approach to 201 W Main Street. It should be noted that the northern portion replacements take precedence to replacements in the southern half of the block. LEGEND CATEGORY 1 WEST 1ST STREET CATEGORY II CATEGORY III FAILING CURB & GUTTER CATEGORY IV (PHOTO t) HEAVING (PHOTO 2) COMPLETELY DETERIORATED (PHOTO 3) MID -BLOCK ALLEY W Z GOOD CONDITION > (PHOTO 4) Q z N EXISTING TREE DETERIORATING DRIVEWAY ACCESS (PHOTO 5) LIKE NEW ADA RAMP (PHOTO 6) 3 BLOCK EXTENTS N I WEST MAIN STREET 25 0 ?5 50 SCALE FEET ' TRIPLE TREE ENGINEE t'1+14 2ND AVENUE -W. MAIN TOW. 1ST -WEST T EXHIBrt BLOCK 2 INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT A LAUREL URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT r . s PHOTOS Photo 1 Photo 2 ram" �• J Photo 3 hlf j�l4j �10;yiF y'XrJ'i .. r. TI ;'j 7-1 ... yr„ .Y4�k�� +••Mp +s, �� F • �1�4 Photo 4 Ile - Photo 5 Photo 6 L 2NDAVE0VUDNEST Location West Main Street to West 11` Street West Right -of -Way loterS�aYe 90 �s Description of Existing S i d e w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. Stormwater inlets are present at the south and north ends. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings, parking areas, and landscaping areas. ADA ramps are present at both ends of the block. Trees and tree wells are present. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 10' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter generally follows a standard 2' in width but varies in depth and shape. Northen and southern portions of curb have rounded gutters while portions near the center have a sharp gutter shape. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown 2nd Ave - From Main St to W 1st St - Westside - Block Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes CategoryI 520 South ADA Ramp Category If 1,545 Throughout Category 111 1,255 Throughout Category IV 550 Located in Northern Half Total 3,870 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) Notes CategoryI 19 South ADA Ramp CategoryII 172 Throughout Category III 112 Throughout CategoryIV 74 Located in Northern Half Total 377 "All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Category(s): I, II, III, IV. All categories are present with majority being II and III Comments: C&G conditions vary greatly throughout the block and condition tends to improve working from north to south. The northern ADA ramp is out of spec in both grade and dimensions. Curb along W 1st St is failing and failing away from the sidewalk. The sidewalk in front of the entrance to 16 2nd Ave West is in rather poor condition and is experiencing significant heaving resulting in ADA concerns. Working south, sidewalk and C&G conditions remain in Categories III and IV until reaching the mid -block alley. The southern half of the block's sidewalk and C&G is mainly categorized as I and II with exception to the approach to the parking lot at 201 W Main Street. The approach is experiencing deterioration and cracking. The ADA Ramp located at the intersection with Main Street is in like new condition. Recommendations: Most of the northern half of the block needs replacement with exception of a small portion of sidewalk and C&G. Recommend replacement of all Category III and IV portions of sidewalk and curb and C&G including northern ADA ramp. The southern half of the block is in better condition, and for the most part is not in need of replacement. Recommend replacing the concrete approach to 201 W Main Street. It should be noted that the northern portion replacements take precedence to replacements in the southern half of the block. LEGEND j CAYEGORY .. ji ! CATr_C,QRY � WEST 1ST STREET CATEGORY1I � C,ATh(;OUY'o I I ..: -ADACG'5::.c?:, "jP 'rMlo U APPRQACr. {FNt)Tt) JI ?1 W z ExtST+rG TREE w rN PAAKAG I.0' c.RAZXl+GANOF.I:a: CM i Prot 1) VIC-tl, 4'Cit Al. I Y milli I��CON51SYfNl °.C7ENA. K I*aYd 6t IFR liI lA ff} T WE kEr?JAMPAMP WEST MAIN STREET `L 2 D AVENUE - W. MAIN TO W. 1ST - EAST } t •r It TRIPLE TREE WFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT 1 A eNci!+eealrlc LAUREL URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT EXHIBIT B PHOTOS Photo i Photo 2 .jAV- Phr it: 3 Photo 4 t ,Z Pr3c:'�r Photo 6 r— VL — i 1, Photo T n:a29 Location West Main ' Street to West V Street West Right -of -Way pf� Description of Existing S i d e w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. Stormwater inlets are present at the south and north ends. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings, parking areas, and landscaping areas. Pedestrian ramps are present at the north and south ends of the block, but not ADA compliant. Tree wells are present, with two existing trees near the north end. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 10' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter is generally 2.5' in width but varies in depth and shape. Organic growth was observed between the curb and sidewalk between the two trees, where curb and gutter shape varied. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown 1st Ave - From Main St to W ist St - Westside - Block 1 Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes Category 1 0 Category II 2,652 Throughout Category III 206 Alley CategoryIV 503 Located in Northern Half Total 3,361 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) Notes CategoryI 0 Category II 266 Throughout Category 111 20 Alley CategoryIV 63 Located in Northern Half Total 349 'All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Category(s): II, III, IV. (Majority is category III and IV. Comments: The northern ADA ramp is out of spec in both grade and dimensions. The southern ramp is out of spec in grade. Sidewalk panels near the trees have experienced uplift and cracking. Beyond the ADA ramps and trees, the overall sidewalk appears to be in good condition. A few large cracks were observed in the mid -block alley that could warrant replacement if a priority, but do not appear to have any functionality issues at this time. The existing curb and gutter appeared to be in good condition as well, with exception of sections around the two existing trees. The trees have visibly pushed curb and gutter segments out, interrupting the flow path. Transition between curb and gutter shapes was observed near the most southern tree. This area appears to have additionally experienced settlement in varying areas causing a "wave" like profile within the gutter. Recommendations: With 15L Avenue seeing a high volume of foot traffic, the ADA ramp replacement at both ends should be prioritized. The north ramp will abut other recommended replacements within sidewalk panels and curb and gutter, making a logical sequence to address all problems within that area. LEGEND CATECARYi CATEGORY i WEST I ST STREET CA��Y 11 .............. . C.lTF�2Y �U' <vr*"tot. hEAV NG. ER,CNEtt t Fi.t)T U si ui z W Q F- cn TL MO-E:.JCK AL_E• Ii"OTQ a) cxsi Inc. �:u.•;;A: r: (rw) 0 +,) r' ;i�aaroel WEST MAIN STREET \ TRIPLE TREE 11A \ ENGINEERING IST AVENUE —W. MAID! TOW. 1ST -WEST Y LO-lbli INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT I A LAUREL. URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT EXHIBIT B PHOTOS Photo ! Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4 �g y ' ;, " �� Phoro 6 --mammon- :! 1sTAVENUE EAST Location West Main r` Street to WesR V Street East Right -of -Way Description of Existing Side w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. Stormwater inlets are present at the south and north ends. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings, landscaping areas, decorative brick, and retaining walls. Decorative brickwork is included in the sidewalk near the open space area, just north of the alley. Concrete in this area appears to be more recent. There are ramps on both ends of the block, however the south ramp is not ADA compliant. The north ramp appears to be ADA compliant but is oriented diagonally, when only a perpendicular crossing to the West exists. Tree wells are present, with multiple trees. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 10' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter generally follows a standard 2' in width on the north half, and a 2.5' width on the south half. The sidewalk transitions between 2.5' and 2' just south of the mid -block alley. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown 1st Ave - From Main St to W 1st St - Eastside - Block 1 Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes Category 1 192 I South End Category II 2,394 Throughout Category 111 489 Throughout Category IV 685 Throughout Total 3,760 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) i Notes Category 1 I 23 South End Category 11 180 Throughout Category 111 92 Throughout Category IV 87 Throughout Total 382 * All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Category(s): I, II, III, IV. All categories are present with majority being II and IV. Comments: The northern ADA ramp appears to be within spec for grade and dimensions. The ramp is oriented diagonally, even though the only crossing is perpendicular, towards the west across I" avenue. The crossing to the north is located around the block corner. Given the spread dynamic and lengthy sight distance of this intersection, consideration should be given to better organizing pedestrian traffic across the intersection. The southern ramp does not meet ADA specs and shows significant cracking within ramps and around poles. Segments of curb and gutter appear older and show signs of use, settlement has been observed near the south end. Trees have pushed out curb segments towards the north and are beginning to show effects on sidewalk panels. Concrete sidewalk on the south end has miscellaneous holes from posts and showed signs of use, but appeared to be more cosmetic rather than functional or structural. Given the right situation, they could present a tripping hazard. Actions should be taken to address any holes or impressions posing risk or hazard, but may not require a full replacement Recommendations: With 15' Avenue seeing a high volume of foot traffic, the ADA ramp replacement at the south end should be prioritized. The north ramp could stay in place; however, it would be logical to orient the ramp correctly to clearly demonstrate the direction of pedestrian traffic. Due to the jogged geometry of 151 Ave, the north crossing across I" street should remain separate from the west crossing across 15f avenue. Curb sections need replaced where trees have pushed them out, and in areas where older curbs show signs of deterioration. Some areas along the curbs show signs of settlement and should be addressed for drainage purposes. Near the open space, a newer strip of concrete behind the back of curb sits lower than the top of the curb. This is likely due to settlement and is not considered a critical part of the project but should be noted. Trees have begun to break and uplift sidewalks on the north end; those panels should be replaced VVEST4 IST STREET C4AG TREEkvt4OT071 �N LLLJ Z W SETTLED C04CP_ TF_ L;uR8 iRANtff�:N P"lTA it EH+;V%G POSTr?!k •a:c-,;g66 3E!TLEDCURSAND GUTTEk IF71Cl It15; Y L rr L 1 ?WNoCOW., ANT RA-P WEST MAIN STREET _ i ST AVENUE -W. MAIN TOW. 1ST -WEST TRIPLE TREE OF STRUCTURE 1ASSESSMEK u A ENGI9EERIftG LAUREL URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT EXHIBIT B PHOTOS pficto I "Pv I -AW' ul, Photo 2 I Photo 1KiIfi HSUY!{URSSiISiIfGCfil7W "' d r r I* v;;,F j r j- I Photo 4 e ,. f.. f phato 5 Photo b 1" AVENUE WEST location West 11 Street to West 3`d Street t •: `''! r West Right -of -Way t r1 'y S Description of Existing S i d e w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. No stormwater inlets are present along 11 Avenue west in this segment. The back of sidewalk primarily ties to buildings, entrances, landscaping areas, and fence. No mid -block alley is present, however there is an approach for the existing drive-thru at the Altana credit union. Concrete in this area appears to be more recent. There are pedestrian ramps on both ends of the block, however neither ramp is ADA compliant. Additionally, an ADA ramp approach has been built on the sidewalk to access a business near the south end. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 14.5' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter is 2.5' in width around the south corner and then transitions into a standard 2' width. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown 1st Ave - From Main St to W ist St - Westside Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes CategoryI 0 Category II 4,105 Central -North Category III 0 CategoryIV 1,440 South End Total 5,545 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) Notes CategoryI 0 Category II 251 Central -North CategoryIII 44 South End CategoryIV 48 South End Total 343 All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Cateoory(s): II, III, IV. Majority of existing conditions are class III throughout the central to north half of the block. Conditions near the south corner are classified as class IV. Comments: The southern pedestrian ramp does not meet ADA requirements and adjacent curb and gutter shows signs of deterioration. All stormwater from the north flows into this gutter and is channeled around the corner to the drain on I" Street, meaning this section of curb and gutter is critical for drainage purposes. The trees in this area have also presented problems such as uplift and cracking. The trees do not have grates around the trunks. A few portions of sidewalk have been replaced within recent years and an additional ramp entrance into a business. Sidewalk in this vicinity shows signs of cracking. The remaining sidewalk appears to be in good condition generally. A few cracks were observed within the drive-thru approach at the bank, but do not appear to compromise any functionality of the approach. The curb and gutter in front of the bank approach shows signs of wear and deterioration, this area could be replaced if considered a priority but is outside of the original project limits. The northern ADA ramp does not meet specifications, despite the concrete appearing to be in good condition and could be replaced if considered a priority but is outside of the original project limits. Recommendations: With 15C Avenue seeing a high volume of foot traffic, the ADA ramp replacement at the south should be prioritized. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk panels in the adjacent areas also need to be replaced. The existing sidewalk in the central and northern part of the block do not present signs warranting full replacement, but should be monitored in the future where existing cracks are located. Sealing existing cracks in the concrete could be considered as an alternative to help prevent weathering and deterioration. Consideration should be given to removing the trees on the north end to prevent foreseeable uplift and cracking on the sidewalk that appears to be in good condition currently. SA TRIPLE TREE IA [HCIH[[Rl%cG LEGEND CAifCOW I ti ; CATEGORY II CAI EGORY Y, CATEGORY V 'tiLy9TPt:iC+aftAu? tF+•ura �. �s TS�,pS 0Rf: E T-RDL,ur APPR0#ZH :PHatosl �w I co 2k13T1»� S0E11A�{ CRACKED ..pW;yTOb ' t r�0 61DEWAM Ic.�osnc•� DrYM CCATFO CU RP: ACC [ A.t: � l nlr0'IO nl Nl WEST 1ST STREET 1ST AVENUE - W. 1ST T4 W. 3RD - WEST E%•iVT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT A LAUREL URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT EXHIBIT B PHOTOS Photo I Photo 2 Photo 3 ::nt -IK►� L Photo 5 Photo 6 x .. MAIN STREET �Locat 2"d Ave ? JesQ to V Ave West , � E i North Right -of -Way Description of Existing S i d e w a I k : Existing sidewalks and curb & gutter are present throughout the block, primarily in Class II condition, Stormwater inlets are present at the East and West ends, with an additional inlet near the center of the block. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings and entrances. One lot near the west end contains a drive approach through the sidewalk. Concrete throughout the block (between ramps) appears to be more recent. Tree wells are present, with multiple trees throughout the block. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 12.5' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter generally follows a standard 2' width. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown Main Street - From 2nd Ave to 1st Ave - Northside Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes Category 1 0 CategoryIl 3,454 Throughout Category 111 110 - Category IV 0 - Total 3,564 Curb & Gutter Condition Length Feet (@ TBC) Notes CategoryI i 0 Category II 305 Throughout Category III 0 - Category IV 0 _ Total 305 * All areas and dimensions are approximate. Condition Category(s): II, I1). All concrete is class II with exception to small area of class III sidewalk adjoining the east pedestrian ramp which needs replaced. Comments: Generally, all sidewalk and curb and gutter appear to be in good condition and displayed minimal signs of deterioration or wear. Cracking and fragmentation were observed on the far east end surrounding traffic signs and signal poles. One crack was observed from a tree well, but the crack was limited to the singular concrete panel around the tree. The panel did not display vertical separation between the cracks. The sidewalk along the drive approach appears to be in satisfactory condition compared to other sidewalk approaches observed in the survey. Recommendations: Because the adjacent ADA ramp will be replaced at the east end, the cracked panels bordering the ramp should additionally be replaced. Consideration should be given to removing existing trees throughout the block prior to them damaging sidewalk via cracking or uplift as displayed in other areas of the survey. LEGEND CAI CCC44Y. CA CATFW-RY II CAY t GCAiY N MID -BLOCK ALLEY LLI LLJ z z w >Lu > < z 04 WSWW SOMALK (PHOTO 2) owCR-WKED CONZRVE SRC#J.VD PU.ES "volo 11 WEST MAIN STREET iw rzrr MAIN ST - 2ND AVE TO 1ST AVE Erntt TREE INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT A A' TRIPLE ENGINEERING LAUREL URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT A L EXHIBIT B PHOTOS Photo Photo Z 4R momm"Im" Photo 3 MAIN STREET 1' Ave to Montana Ave North night -of -Way Description of Existing Sid e w a I k : Existing sidewalk and curb & gutter are present throughout the block in varying conditions. Stormwater inlets are present at the east and West ends. The east inlet was filled with debris. Back of sidewalk ties to buildings and entrances. There are pedestrian ramps on both ends of the block, however neither are ADA compliant. Tree wells are present, without any trees in place. Dimensions & Area: The existing sidewalk is approximately 12' in width throughout the block. Curb & gutter follows a 2' width on the east end and transitions to a 2.5' width closer towards the west. Table 1. Concrete Breakdown Main Street - From 1st Ave to MT Ave - Northside Sidewalk Condition Area (sf) Notes Category I 0 Category II 2,611 Throughout Category III 104 I 1 section, east side Category IV 735 Sp ifl I P L E T R E E IEN I N E F R I N G EXHIBIT 2 Draft Proposed Project Map 1145 Cap Road // Helena, MT 59602 // 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_0310 10% Meeting - Minutes.docx 00 100 3AV OGV40-100 /vv -4,vom, w DAV VNVINOtN LLJ a z ]AV iS � L L + i L 1\1 \I F �4 CO3a M] Private Building ADA Accessibility Photos 1145 Cap Road H Helena, MT 59602 H 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Correspondence\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_031010% Meeting - Minutes.docx Z i M t F4 Z' ry I I TRIPLE TREE ENGINEERING 10101�� 10% Lighting Plans/Preliminary Lighting Layout 1145 Cap Road H Helena, MT 59602 H 406.461.0692 www.tripletreemt.com P:\Laurel\24-105 LURA North Sidewalks & Lighting TO - 2\Corresponden ce\Meetings\2025_0310 Progress Meeting\2025_0310 Meeting Minutes\2025_0310 10% Meeting - Minutes.docx c-- I L f ;— d 9NItl33N17N3 338131dI81 S I19185L got IDV 9LIUSYi-"Y [OS 651N'SONIIIl9 'QAll HSINYVH MZ HJd z W U Lt] LU SLN31X33 tlNtl1NOW '13ilnVIfltll lORllSla IVM3N3M NMIn 138nyi ONIIHOI-I aN`d S)Ilt/M3QIS H12ION V2�f11 � U o Z�� L�70-- I°—" Z zz z z a i i i a z <��< �;�� O w w w w o �: I�^ LLIV N 0� LU z U LU .� zaaaa V f '� wwwww U.J _ V) w z z z z z > w r, _ O oz o = V LL] L Q ou0uu¢ U zzz z Z,Fy a= V Z w •--• a U j U U V V 3�uzw ��Q F—W Q0Jo jF �F r W z .-J z s a V aaaaz� uLL at— w 7 w V w �"� oc ° LL.) >0000�2 FaZ22W Z w a �'� O f i r w p °Ua i i i ivVi �o33u a g `�/ z o 3535353 0 o x 0 7 u aaaaaaa X- w ° F z GGGGGGG a o �u33- � o w � � z o ae LL c°c e 0 x 7 J ¢ ro � w ,^ �j o v• of J VZ m F a Q ¢Q 7 UZFU O O ° o°Z Ia— upUr F0ZwO° u O Z O & ww3¢aoF m mu - wN�F rm oe ur LLZF rmz_w o3m- F -- Z Z �' 7 w 7 V Z N z Y z d Z� F � 0 - LL w sw m7a.¢z�g 0w a z w ''i oOrP3o�7j 7xjo� o°ei 0o u,wo44a u> N a IaZw OOrF1 F€€w OF�w� oe �0 a¢ pFw w VO ww ZwO..a w�go 20 a'O�� 7El n.0 WZ2 eoeo Z� :2.,wa-°EZ7 wUn. w�00 '' ww'� =,"n IJ.1 F1= aO & v wwNw—w ww wG OF�LLwu o—wVOs war=a r t7: Z=w0F3>z�33�x3e33°EU>5c�-i=WZ-�5!2 mww al=wOF�z¢ ¢¢ 2�Oa OOwwww--V2-77 a2wOw0 ZZZZZ d j i i Z Z Z 00 0 0 0 00c o n a n n oe n , r r r r F~ 7 7 7 7 7 m 3 3 r m m LLi�na¢�acfLLe fZuxiw ¢ZO>OOOOOOaua�mouo7umw 0r7=O1 =F3¢QvOOa3:&w x ...� '_ ° O F v r V w 7 F z zz z o pG aR v °o o V o o=o ° Q� w�z„��zFwQ¢OFZi"Z>o�LL�wOw Qw� J °F-¢ZL U=ww z �V�Oz zVFa o°1 U.JZx 3n7F�Z ZM w¢ Q K zOm a0 0 Ow7vimwZVQQ¢¢aa�Qwp7- LU l- U0ZwaZUZZ>x j�7�r��> �u 0u0 VUwUZ�=�u�ZOI - ZOO.:lHxmmmmmmOOw0000o�oe¢oXJ'w.wW wxfw uumUUUuuo�xU¢f > F mLL„ mV 0OLLLLuuVLLu V O wUuLLu000Fom¢N B:auVYzOU ¢ammmmmm- UUVUUUU- wwwwO�rn UUwcLL[ ........... 3381 31di81 ELI7I95Z Vol 37V 9S10-SY990Y .6S ik'S'JNI7119 'OA19 HSINWH OKZ \I 3D V I 1 PFNNSY ��N/ggVc I I I I I VNVINOW 'l32lf7Vl 101dllS10 lVAUNMI NVG8n 13Nf1Vl JNUHJIl ONd S)IlVM3a1S HINON vNn-i YOMING AVE 0 I Q I 0 I � I J I I I I Ae a3�3.a � O e au ao W 4 g arm noueimaa 3iw s �r 9NI833N19N3 3Hi 31dl8,\CC I I191esz got 3w 9LIO snL v L016S IH 'SDNU7119 'QAs HSINIVN OWZ hl '9V V F- O z u S1N31X31o3m8d 31 � VNVINOW'13NnV1 "0` "e a�cx i 10RUSI41VM3N3H Nva in 138nV1 �ar -awed n W JNULHJ1l ONd SMIVM301S HJLMON vNn-1 — o Q U �JLL,�Zc�n W f- Z woo 3RD AVE 4 8 / S1N31X3103fONd VNV.NOW'l3Nf1Vl _a 10I81SIC lVM3NBH NV98n 138nv-i +emwea dw93d�tlr 31w ONIIHOIl ONb S)IIVM3aIS HINONyNni O N I H 3 3 N 1 7 N 3 --- — ----------- 33U 31dlal c119iaSZOO13Dr9"0"Z,9"16S (cc 1H'S'JNIl71B '0A'IS HONI" O0 Z �d °1�¢¢ EVE G; _> L �,aoo Z ox o of o�ooQ� uC Ln 0 Q U a u w ySTq 4 s n S1N31X3 iowONd y VNVIN0W''13unVl 100` t:- 10181SIO lVM3N38 Nvemn l3mntllONI1H011 ONV SNI M3a1S HIHON�d2ifll BNIN33NIDU 338131d181 0 U c IVl9szaot37v o Z Of Of rot 65' LN`SXiI111B Z O 'UAIi MSIIl3VH OKZ J LL (n WF-Z .ni 3J VV [if Z 0 w F- 0 z W w uzi u u a U u3 w 0 z a o� u Q uQ z= oce o V w 0 z u rLa r �= ( m o� ��¢ �z o =3 a�Nu F 3 u p 0 r o a Z 3� 0uu '00 z° amW W¢�eo¢z Q?o��o 3u zm t2zzm >zi -iz0<5 �N5z�W dr-�o w z U 3 ao�3o0 �aW zY � 3:r r 0 0 � r , WYOMING AVE PENNSYLVANIA A COLORADO AVE M {A w ONIH33NISN3 3381 31dl8l I I19lsS[ eo[ D 9CItrs r90t ", 651H'S'JNIIIIS '0AI9 NSINMW OWZ H DV z a� Q o� o �¢ cis zm z� o= o ou V z oz u�W w z = 3a w 3 V z0O t ow z ��2 z ¢ 3� OV u =3 cu 00 O �F z W C7 ¢ V v .� >O�z Q -' xO 7 O V � v � =1 '0 > z aG z0 Y G J� waoo 0X Vx OLj O�V OQ¢ Q m V O S1N31X3 ioam 3d -, VNVINOW '13amq 131H1SIG IVM3N3d NVG'dn 13unvi xcc JNIIHJII aNV SMIVM301S H I NON H2 m 7gVE CO r w U \Z�:D 0 W 0 Z azv v� Ln c13 SLNIM iow Md ' O vNV1NOW'iamnvi loa :ee a�o-so 101HISIO lVM3N3N Nvain i32invi »x ��eDaweD ONIIH011 aNV SNlVM3DIS HIMON tR m sxia33xisx3 3381 31d181 O < U oQ D S I l914SL 901 DY Z [If 9LlRSYL9DY O C Q LD165 LH M17111 r 'OAl9 HSINIVH DYOL _J L w H Z woo $ z 0 0 /; N Q mg W� aEg udg a mY og �vgo a a �y ei J N J S.LN3M io3rOHd A vwmoW •132invi wa :iea>xao noueirns3a �,q 13I1liSld IVM3N38 NVGHn iaN vi na :aemu�m JNIIHJII ONH SMIVM301S HINONymn-i ONIN33NIDN3 1 z33HI31di8i o Q W-cltslYSZYo3v — 20vilo-s r-wo 02O 16'IW'SDKITIIY ft All Ns1Nm Moo Z mF—uLL � U 7llpj U F OvvOp � pzz�� 0 -wSopo W „1 ,Z=a U V 0 mWwVOr° 4 U J 4 �-Va W OC x oowgz m aC W pa0 =maza �xO�> aop�rWVp y w oozoowzm 660� V F'• �W � O L d. N P _ p — S — -4— — iY N 7 W W J V1 1.1 O F, W N LL N Y W N N LL m JW J � 2 OL OC F C] W LL V K W ►� aC O = 7 V m U � U yl 70. m O 1+Q- Z U z M O m Mf Z N >> a apGV W 1—t Jz _0 O� x u� Z Z m zV m ul o C� am wz a OO W X0 U w z0 U UwF O p 1 ou am �o z z V S1N31n 103fONd vNvlNow'13Hnvl G ry uxniy�a3a uw 1oniisia 1vM3N3N Nv92ln 13L1nv1 10 R id ONIlHOII GNd SN'lVM30IS HINON v?jni