HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Workshop Minutes 04.27.2010 MINUTES
COUNCIL WORKSHOP
APRIL 27, 2010 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
A Council Workshop was held in the Council Chambers and called to order by Mayor Ken Olson at
6:30 p.m. on April 27, 2010.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
_x Emelie Eaton _x_ Doug Poehls
_x_ Kate Hart _x_ Mark Mace
_x Chuck Rodgers _x_ Chuck Dickerson
Alex Wilkins _x Norm Stamper
OTHERS PRESENT:
Sam Painter James Caniglia
Bill Sheridan Rick Musson
Kurt Markegard Derek Yeager
Public Input (three - minute limit):
Citizens may address the Council regarding any item of City business not on the agenda. The duration for an individual
speaking under Public Input is limited to three minutes. While all comments are welcome, the Council will not take action
on any item not on the agenda.
There was no public input.
General items:
• Laurel Ambulance — Appointment of Elliot Grayson as an EMT
The appointment will be on the May 4th council agenda.
Public Works Department:
• Jack Roma's request for easement on city property
Kurt Markegard stated that, if the city council considers Jack Roma's request, he asked that the
private road going across public land would meet Montana Public Works Standards. MMIA told Kurt
that it would be the city's exposure, but if the road is built to Public Works Standards, it lessens the
city's exposure to the traveling public that would use the access into Jack Roma's property. Since the
road would be on city property, it would have to be built to Montana Public Works Standards. The
city does not have any private roads on city property that access anybody else's residential streets or
property. Kurt stated that the fence would need to be maintained.
Chuck Dickerson asked if Jack would be responsible to put the road in to public works standards and
if he was aware of the requirements.
Kurt explained that Jack would need to hire an engineer to draw up plans, evaluate the site and slope
gradient, and determine how to address the storm water. Kurt stated that this is his recommendation.
If the council wants him to express this recommendation to Jack, he could do that, but the council has
not made a decision. There was further discussion regarding informing Jack.
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
Doug Poehls stated that the item should be on the next agenda for a council vote. After that, Kurt
could be instructed to inform Jack of the council's decision.
Mark Mace asked whether the waterline at this location would be under the road.
Kurt stated that the waterline would be under the road. Public works will try to find the exact location
of the line. Kurt mentioned that there is an area with high trees right in front of that property, and
there will be snow on the street in the winter. He questioned whether the city would have to maintain
the street. Elena Subdivision has a private road that is maintained by a homeowners' association. If
something happens to the waterline and it damages the street, the utility would have to replace
anything allowed above it, as with any utilities.
Mayor Olson asked Doug regarding the verbiage for the resolution.
Doug stated that it should agree with Kurt's recommendation that the private road on public property
should be built to Montana Public Works Standards and the fencing has to be replaced for the pasture
land.
Sam stated that the resolution should incorporate the recommendations, terms and conditions for the
council's consideration. If changes are needed, the council could amend it at the council meeting.
Insurance issues could be included in the resolution.
Mayor Olson stated that a resolution would be prepared for the council's consideration on May 4`
Chuck Rodgers asked regarding the size and age of the waterline.
Kurt stated that the waterline was installed within the last twenty years. There was discussion
regarding the location of the line and the easements. Kurt stated that another line goes up Fifth
Avenue, crosses under the ditch, splits in the middle of Jack Roma's property, and goes back and
feeds into the booster station at Murray Park.
Mayor Olson stated that the size and location of the line would be determined.
• Water fill station
Kurt stated that the council authorized public works and Great West to determine the cost estimate for
the water fill station. The only city -owned property available immediately is at the city shop where
the old Department of Transportation building is located. The half block area would need additional
fencing, and people could access it off South 6 Avenue and South 5 Avenue along the railroad
tracks. The right -of -way is currently a gravel road that goes in behind Helena Chemical and Rutt's
and goes in an east gate to access the city shop to the east.
Chad Hanson stated that, with the bulk water rate increase, there was talk that some bulk water
distributors might quit doing business. The council wanted to have a backup plan in place and
directed star and the engineers to prepare cost estimates. Chad has contacted the manufacturers of
different bulk water stations and found that there is a wide range of options. Current preliminary cost
estimates range from $90,000 to $180,000, including the site work. These bulk stations range from a
metal box to a fancy pre - fabricated building. The controls could be coin - operated, credit card, pre-
paid cards, or invoiced through the billing department. Chad will work with city staff to figure out the
2
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
details. Chad hopes to have the plans fmalized by mid -May or the end of May. Depending on the
final plans and installation work required, Chad expects that construction could begin within a couple
months. There was a question regarding using the city crew for some of the work. Chad stated that
the cost estimate is to go to bid and hire a contractor, but using city staff could potentially save
money. The report includes information regarding other communities that have water treatment
plants on the Yellowstone, their bulk water rates, a comparison and analysis of the rates, and how
long it would take to repay the capital costs. Chad will give another presentation at the next council
workshop.
• SID for rebuild of streets damaged during water line replacement
Kurt stated that the council directed staff to go forward with the SID to rebuild the streets from First
Avenue to Wyoming Avenue. The cost estimates and the cost per parcel have been distributed to the
council. Kurt and Chad want to write a letter to all the citizens to find out if they would support the
SID. The letter would include a stamped return envelope for their convenience. This would allow the
city to determine the support before incurring the costs involved in a full -blown SID and possibly
having it fail. If 51 percent of the property owners are against, the SID would fail.
The city crew removed some of the mud and put in some millings in front of the old middle school on
Colorado. The crew packed it down as a temporary fix and is getting a lot of applause for that.
However, that is not a permanent solution. The water and sewer lines are fixed, so the city could go
forward with the SID. The problem is paying for it. Any time utility work is done in the City of
Laurel, the street condition is going to be a major factor until the funding agencies allow the city to
have the utility pay for everything. Either way, the residents have to pay for infrastructure costs.
Kurt is reviewing how to leverage some street maintenance funds to offset the costs of reconstruction.
Kurt mentioned the need to use the pavement index program to rank the streets and develop a total
pavement preservation and reconstruction plan.
• Resolution — Agreement with MDT for street cleaning
Kurt stated that the two -year agreement for $5,084.10 with MDT is for street sweeping on Main Street
and South First Avenue. This is the third contract with the same payment. The resolution and
agreement will be on the May 4th council agenda.
• Resolution — Change Order No. 2 (Reconciliation) for the 2009 Street Maintenance Project
Kurt stated that this reconciliation change order is for the 2009 street maintenance project. The city
went out to bid, hired a contractor to do the work, amended the contract for additional work, and did
not spend all of the money. The reconciliation is needed to amend and decrease the contract in the
amount of $1,775.21 that was not paid to the contractor.
Chad stated that quantities are estimated as close as possible. The reconciliation change order is done
at the end of the project to close out the contract dollars so they match. The city has already paid the
contractor and this makes the contract amount match what was actually paid to the contractor. The
resolution change order will be on the May 4th council agenda.
• Resolution — Task Order No. 18 with Great West Engineering for the Montana to Wyoming
SID
Kurt stated that the task order authorizes Great West to begin working on the SID.
3
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
Chad explained that most contracts are based on one percent of construction. He did not write this
task order for all the design and construction, as he is not very optimistic that it will go forward. Chad
will assist with the letters to the property owners, preparing the exhibits attached to the letter, the cost
estimates, public hearings, and providing exhibits to bond counsel. If Great West does not spend all
of the estimated cost, it will be returned to the city. If the residents decide to go forward with the SID,
Great West will amend the task order to include the design.
Planning Department:
• Energy Grant
James Caniglia stated that the energy audit was completed last week. The auditor looked at the
windows and boilers to make sure everything in the grant application was accurate and to assess the
energy savings expected. The audit report is due early in May and the State expects the contracts to
be out the middle of May.
• Extension of medical marijuana moratorium
James stated that Sam reviewed the language of the current moratorium. The ordinance states that the
city planner would present a report to the council in June. The timeframe for the moratorium is six
months, so an extension would be needed if nothing is in place within six months. James plans to
present information to the council in the next two to three months. The Planning Board minutes
explain the discussion at that level.
Police Department:
• Resolution — Support Renewal Agreement with Industrial Communications & Electronics
Chief Musson explained the resolutions and agreements with Industrial Electronics. The city
purchased the Enhanced 911 equipment several years ago and the warranty and service contract have
ended. Agreements are needed for support renewal and replacement workstations. The city has used
Industrial Communications and Electronics (ICE) since the 911 program started. The contract must
be signed in order for ICE technicians to get support from the mother company, Plant CML out of
Kansas City. Only three companies in Montana handle this type of equipment. Mountain
Communications is a Motorola dealer out of Bozeman, and Rick received a quote from them. A
company in Kalispell has an office in Great Falls, but they did not submit a quote as they are too far
away to provide service. Rick recommends approving the contract with Industrial Electronics
because they are within 20 miles and can provide immediate service. There will be one change in the
contracts. The support renewal agreement as distributed was for $13,758.00, but was changed to
$13,865.00. The contracts will be renewed for one year, but Rick will probably present a three -year
contract next year.
• Resolution — Agreement for Replacement Workstations with Industrial Communications &
Electronics
Rick stated that this resolution is for the equipment. Plant CML, Industrial Electronics, and E -911
recommends that equipment is updated every three years. The contract for replacement workstations
is for the equipment sitting in dispatch. The other contract is for all the equipment sitting in the back
room, which are the brains of the operation. Rick stated that 911 has broad requirements that allow
departments to purchase equipment, and 911 funds will be used for these contracts. Rick
recommended that the council approve both contracts.
Chief Administrative Officer:
• Discussion — Professional Services Contract with Beartooth RC &D for the HOME Program
4
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
Bill Sheridan explained that the city has participated in the Montana HOME Program that provides
fmancial assistance, mostly down payments, to people to purchase a home. The system has worked
very well. Recently, the group that assists the city has not been available and have either ended their
operation or temporarily ended their operation. The city has tried to contact them. Bill contacted the
State of Montana for information about this particular operation, but the State does not have an
answer. There is another possibility of professional services through a contract with Beartooth
RC &D and a representative attended tonight's meeting.
Diana Spint stated that Beartooth RC &D has offered its services to help administer the HOME
Program. However, she made a couple phone calls today to the Montana Department of Housing
regarding new rules and regulations that were just passed. They indicated that they will be sending a
letter to the City of Laurel in the next couple weeks wanting any leftover funds returned back to the
State. When she asked them about Beartooth RC &D being a qualified entity, they said regardless of
who would administer it, the City of Laurel would still have to be a qualified applicant. Diana
proposed that, if the City of Laurel is interested in continuing, Beartooth could assist with preparing
the qualification packet. She stated that Beartooth is a non -profit organization and is preparing
applications to be a certified housing development organization and to provide down payment
assistance for the five - county area it serves. These include Big Horn, Yellowstone, Stillwater, Carbon
and Sweet Grass Counties. If the city elects not to pursue it and sends the money back, she stated that
Beartooth will soon come to the plate to administer and market to provide down payment assistance in
this area. Their future long -term goals are to have a rehab repair program that can partner with
several different organizations and new development. The State redid the rules and took away
everyone's authority. Any entity that received the grant under the competitive program was
grandfathered in to the set of rules. The State wants everybody that had a competitive grant to
reapply for the non - competitive funds so all entities have to abide by the new standards, rules and
regulations.
There was discussion regarding residents that have benefitted from the HOME and rehab programs.
• Letter regarding the old Laurel dump site
Bill Sheridan spoke regarding the old Laurel dump site at the Yellowstone River. The State of
Montana has suggested there is not a major problem but the city should start trying to improve the
looks and ensure there is no contamination at the river. Great West Engineering provided several
ways to deal with the contamination. Great West advised the city of a grant program through the
Federal Corps of Engineers that would provide a 65 percent grant towards reducing the contamination
and isolating the problem. The city would be responsible for the remaining 35 percent. Bill
suggested that the city should pursue the 65 percent grant to deal with this problem. If the city
pursued the 65 percent grant to deal with the improvements at the old city dump, the Federal
government would recognize it as an attempt to go forward. If the city does not pursue the grant, the
Federal government could get upset and fine the city.
Mayor Olson encouraged the council to give authorization to sign this letter for the grant application.
Executive Review:
• Ordinance No. 010 -02 — Discussion regarding bond requirement
Mayor Olson explained that the provisions in Section 5.08.040, Subsection A., 1. 2. 3., are now
underlined to show it is new items in the ordinance. The provisions would require general liability
insurance limits of $1 million per occurrence, commercial automobile liability insurance of $1
5
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
million, and proof of workers' compensation. He stated that the $1 million per occurrence for the
general liability and the automobile liability are subject to the council's discretion. Billings and Great
Falls do not have set amounts for this, and Missoula requires $1 million. A local general contractor
thought the requirements were excessive and that small contractors might not be able to reach that
easily. Mayor Olson suggested that the council determine if a dollar amount is needed or should be
set at $500,000. This is the second reading of the ordinance and an amendment would be required to
change the verbiage.
There was discussion regarding the proposed $1 million requirement, the fact that the majority of
residential homes in Laurel would fit under a $500,000 cap, commercial requirements for $3 million
liability caps, and the intention to require contractors to show they are a legitimate operation.
Sam pointed out that the intention is for the contractor to produce certain things to show that he /she is
a legitimate operation. If a person applies for a license and has absolutely no insurance whatsoever,
chances are he /she is not experienced and does not have assets to back up any problems. The cities
that require proof of liability insurance and proof of contractor insurance with no limits are basically
interested to see if the person is a legitimate operator. There are two extremes, as some cities require
a substantial amount of insurance and other cities require less. The council can decide how strictly to
regulate contractors. Sam agrees that $1 million is probably a lot, since there are not million dollar
homes within the city limits. Perhaps $500,000 is more accurate. No one attended the public hearing,
so it does not seem like there is a lot of interest. Sam recommended scheduling another public
hearing if some substantive is changed in the ordinance. Depending on the amount of testimony
received, the council could then vote on the second reading that night after the public hearing. Sam
will prepare two alternative ordinances for the public hearing and the council's consideration.
• Discussion — Request for additional mill levy for Planning Department
James stated that the City of Billings recently requested a ballot mill levy to increase the mill levies
for its planning department. Laurel is in a slightly different situation as the city has received increases
in the mill levy without a vote. Past history shows that the County Commissioners increased the
planning mill levy: 1.22 in 2005 -2006; 1.35 in 2006 -2007; 1.40 in 2007 -2008; 1.66 in 2008 -2009;
and 1.72 in 2009 -2010. The County Commissioners have some leeway in the amount of mill levy for
Laurel. The Commissioners gave minimum mill levies across the board in 2010. James asked for the
council's support to ask the County Commissioners to increase the mill levy for Planning as much as
allowed under law. The Planning budget is a fixed budget of $50,484 for the financial year, which
covers the planner's wages, health insurance, and a small portion of Cheryll's salary. The Planning
budget the last couple years, minus the grants, has been about $62,000. It is a very frugal budget and
money is not spent needlessly. James spoke regarding the expenses in his budget, the grant matches
for the Historic Grant and the Transit Grant, and the lack of funds for further grant matching. He
asked the council for a letter of support to the County Commissioners requesting the maximum mill
levy increase for the City of Laurel's Planning Department.
Sam will prepare a resolution stating the council's support. Doug suggested including signature lines
for each council member to emphasize the importance to the County Commissioners.
• Council Issues:
o Public Works Committee — Sidewalk conditions on East Main from First Avenue to
Montana Avenue (Mark Mace)
6
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
Mark stated that the Public Works Committee recently discussed the sidewalk conditions and
recommended that action be taken. There was a lengthy discussion regarding remediation of
sidewalks citywide, the sidewalk program in Hardin, the authority to direct replacement of sidewalks,
and the need for sidewalk program in the City of Laurel.
o Update regarding Asphalt Supply (Emelie Eaton)
Kurt explained that Joe Gentri, MRL, recently informed Gary Colley that the contractor could not
deal with the product found in the tanks at Asphalt Supply. MRL is trying to finalize a contract.
There was discussion regarding the city's option to take civil action against MRL. The suggestion
was made to send a letter to Joe Gentri to explain the health and community hazard caused by the
flammable substance in the tanks and the debris that comes off the building. Mayor Olson will draft a
letter and invite MRL to attend a council meeting for further discussion. There was discussion
regarding the weed issues on MRL property, which could be addressed by code enforcement.
o Annexation of properties (Emelie Eaton)
James explained that MCA does not allow forced annexation of properties that are surrounded by city
property on three sides. The only way to force annexation is under MCA Section 7.2.4500, which is
annexation of wholly surrounded land. Although some people think contiguous means a certain
amount of sides, contiguous only means one side. If only the southern portion of a property is against
the city limits, that is contiguous. Fully contiguous would mean fully surrounded. There are no
houses or tracts of land in the city limits that could be forced to annex based on that provision or the
definition of contiguous. City lots are available in Elena, Iron Horse, and Mace Subdivisions. James
stated that there is the option to force county people that are on city water to annex into the city. The
council could decide that the properties need to annex or the water service would be disconnected.
This would require research regarding the feasibility of providing full services to those homes.
James stated that he has been very diligent not to allow variances for people in the county, especially
when they are close to the city limits. When people call with questions about subdividing in the
county, want a gravel road going to a paved road, or ask for a variance from the requirement for a
second entrance to the subdivision, James tells them he would not recommend that. He does not have
the final call, but it is his understanding that the planning board and the County Commissioners would
not approve. He has done this to try to protect the undeveloped land near the city so that one day it
can be annexed.
o Police Department's policy & procedures regarding complaints out of Laurel's
jurisdiction — (Doug Poehls)
Chief Musson stated that dispatch provides callers with the phone numbers of the appropriate agency
to handle the call according to jurisdiction. There was discussion.
o Storage container at the corner of 6 Street and 5 Avenue (Kate Hart)
Chief Musson explained that Officer Brew checked on this issue today. After a fire in the house, the
homeowner used the container for storage during the restoration. The container should be removed
by next week.
There was discussion regarding storage containers, the need for a permit requirement for temporary
storage containers, and the need to review the ordinances regarding this issue.
o Tour of WTP and WWTP on June 22 1 ' d
7
Council Workshop Minutes of April 27, 2010
Tours of the water and wastewater treatment plants are scheduled on June 22
Other items
There was no discussion.
Review of draft council agenda for May 4, 2010
The following items will be added to the council agenda: resolution regarding Jack Roma's request;
resolution requesting an increased mill levy for the planning department; and a motion setting another
public hearing for Ordinance No. 10 -02.
Attendance at the May 4, 2010 council meeting
Doug might not be able to attend.
Announcements
Chuck Rodgers stated that the Rosselot monument has been erected, and the plaque will be placed as
soon as the marble is received. The project will be done by Memorial Day. The new gathering site
has been completed and work will be done on the flags and landscaping.
Emelie Eaton asked for an explanation of the letter from DEQ at the next council workshop.
Mayor Olson stated two changes in the chairmanship of two committees for the council's
consideration. The first is for Chuck Rodgers as chairman of the Cemetery Commission. The second
is for Norm Stamper as the chairman of the Park Board. The appointments will be on the May 4
council agenda.
MDT informed the city that the underpass will be closed on Wednesday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
The contractor will fill in the piece of asphalt on the west side. Mayor Olson stated that the
discussion regarding the ADA accessibility ramp was put to the council. This should complete the
majority of the work in the underpass.
The council workshop adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
C6-t,d44,
Cindy Allen
Council Secretary
NOTE: This meeting is open to the public. This meeting is for information and discussion of
the Council for the listed workshop agenda items.
8
FYO9 -10 FINAL BUDGET SUMMARY
and 5 YEAR HISTORY
LAUREL PLANNING
This fund accounts for the tax levied on the properties located within Laurel and a 4.5 mile outside city limits.
Monies collected are distributed to the City of Laurel.
$55,000
$50,000
$45,000 z
$40,000
$35,000
a.e 3
• FY06
$30,000 FY07
0 FY08
$25,000 ❑ FY09
■ FY10
$20,000
$15,000 &,
$10,000
$5,000
W Operating Total
Actual Actual Actual Amd Budget Budget
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
Operating $ 26,602 $ 29,441 $ 32,991 $ 49,595 $ 50,484
Total 1 $ 26,602 I $ 29,441 I $ 32,991 I $ 49,595 1 $ 50,484
153
■
Go 1000 0)
H ( 010 CO 10 n NI.
c7 117
1)
0
CC
a
J p O'- N V . ^ 0 0 0 GO CO
et
< 2
Z W 0 0 0 01 0 001 0 0 000 0 10
N
Q m V' 10 01 .
O)
0
>.
u.
= W 00 O 1
0 CO V N .-
0 a) 7
L6 CP;
0 m et
1L
w m
' J OON100M NN1-
L a �NN� V' ON el
w 1.. n `0 CO
Q N CO
a W co
"te Le
L
0 h 1-100 (0OO - Nrn F.
4_ Z " 2 W . - isNOO V' OD C4 N
WU' f0 09N .- 10
O Z <= N 1
10 M
m .1
I mmq
Q 1
o
�_
CD a
w
w Ce
Q w 0 m
w ~ ^ w 2m
cc amt
w
OC CCWUW <CW
w a aF
C'Z > JQOC Z
LU
cc cc 0
0c ag ai- -aa=
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000
O 0 0 00000
• NN '- NV'
0 0 0 0 O 0 N N N
N M 10 LOU)
(0 M (0 (0 M M M M M
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 u5 ui 10 ui 10 u) O ui (0
0 10 10 10 10 10 10 t0 10 t0
4 N N N N N N N N N
152
FY 09 -10 FINAL REVENUE BUDGET
and 5 YEAR REVENUE HISTORY
LAUREL COUNTY PLANNING
Millage change primarily result of 1.112% inflation adjustment and loss in taxable value for the district.
TAX REVENUE $ 44,735 FY 09 MILLS 1.66
NON -TAX REVENUE 5,749 FY 10 MILLS 1.72
TOTAL REVENUES $ 50,484 Millage Change 0.06
Use / (Source) of Reserves -
TOTAL RESOURCES USED $ 50,484
BASE APPROPRIATIONS $ 50,484 Reserves 7/1/09 $ 0
Conting, One -time, Bldg trans - (Use) /Source of Reserves -
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $ 50,484 Proj. Res. 6130/10 $ 0
$60,000 il
$55,000
$50,000
$45,000
t
$40,000 e .. , <.
®ACTUAL FY 06 .
•ACTUAL FY07
$35,000
DACTUAL FY08 _ ' ,7,,,, r .: :
DACTUAL FY09
$30,000
■BUDGET FY10 ;
$25,000 x
$20,000 ,
t
$15,000
$10,000 0 `
$5,000
TAXES LICENSES GOV'TL CHARGES FINES INT /MISC TRANSFER TOTALS
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
TAXES $ 21,675 $ 24,414 $ 27,781 $ 43,972 $ 44,735
LICENSES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
GOV'TL $ 4,926 $ 5,026 $ 5,209 $ 5,406 $ 5,749
CHARGES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
FINES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
INT /MISC $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TRANSFER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
'TOTALS I $ 26,601 1 $ 29,440 1 $ 32,990 1 $ 49,378 1 $ 50,484I
151
I
CITY OF LAUREL
2008 -2009 BUDGET
1
Mill Levy 2004 -2005 Mill Value $5,696
0,
GENERAL ALL PURPOSE
COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE 101.00
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDY COMMISSION 7.
PERS
GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 15
1111
AIRPORT AUTHORITY 5.81
SUBTOTAL 16.89
CITY - COUNTY PLANNING 2.97
TOTAL SUBJECT TO HB124 133.89
PERMISSIVE MEDICAL LEVY (HB409) 1.19
135.08
TOTAL MILLS 25.67
160.75
Mill Levy 2005 -2006 Mill Value $5,885
GENERAL ALL PURPOSE
COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE 102.14
II LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDY COMMISSION 8.37
PERS .85
GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 5.24
AIRPORT AUTHORITY 17.30
SUBTOTAL 3.03
CIT Y - COUNTY PLANNING 136.93
TOTAL SUBJECT TO HB124 1.22
PERMISSIVE MEDICAL LEVY (HB409) 138.15
TOTAL MILLS 27.83
165.98
Mill Levy 2006 -2007 Mill Value $5,996
GENERAL ALL PURPOSE
COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE 105.04
" PERS 8.76
�'' GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
AIRPORT AUTHORITY 5.37
SUBTOTAL 17.75
CITY - COUNTY PLANNING r 3.10
TOTAL SUBJECT TO HB124 140.02
PERMISSIVE MEDICAL LEVY (HB409) 1.35
138.15
TOTAL MILLS 68.71
Mill 168.71
Levy 2007 -2008 Mill Value $6,192
GENERAL ALL PURPOSE
COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE 107.74
PERS 8.96
GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 8.26
AIRPORT AUTHORITY 18.26
SUBTOTAL 3.18
CITY - COUNTY PLANNING 143.65
TOTAL SUBJECT TO HB124 1.40
PERMISSIVE MEDICAL LEVY (HB409) 145.05
I TOTAL MILLS 24.75
169.80
Mill Levy 2008 -2009 Mill Value $6,337 (Less TIFD mills)
l' GENERAL ALL PURPOSE
COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE 115.05
PERS
9.58
GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
AIRPORT AUTHORITY 6.93
19.25
SUBTOTAL 3.18
CITY - COUNTY PLANNING 153.99
TOTAL SUBJECT TO HB124 1.66
PERMISSIVE MEDICAL LEVY (HB409) 155.85
I TOTAL MILLS 30.28
"e o r 0 9 ' - (0 1 185.93
l..
5 L-s Y o-" r / Cpl