Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Utilities Committee Minutes 11.14.1994• MEMBERS PRESENT: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 14, 1994 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. Ron Marshall, acting chairman Bob Graham John Minch Albert Ehrlick L. D. Collins Phil Curry Sharon Herman OTHERS PRESENT: O'Shean Moran Rod Nealy Richard Barnhardt Chuck Rodgers A quorum of three (3) or more members being present the following business was conducted: First item of business; Rod Nealy met with the committee in -reference to a $60.00 bill he received for replacement of a frozen meter. Mr. Nealy moved a mobile home into Village Subdivision and installed a meter that he had "found" in the immediate area. On 4/19/94 John Minch attached a remote. Both the remote and meter were set on Zero. On 5/19/94 a new meter was installed because the old one had frozen. Mr. Nealy's contention was that it was the city's responsibility to ensure the first meter was operable. Much discussion followed as to what previous city practices had been. Motion made by Bob Graham, seconded by Albert Ehrlick, to charge Mr. Nealy for repairs to the meter if it could be repaired, or the full amount in the event that it couldn't be repaired. Motion defeated on a vote of 3--4. More discussion followed. Motion made by Bob Graham, seconded by L. D. Collins, to charge Mr. Nealy $60.00 for the replacement of the meter. Motion carried. Second item of business; Richard Barnhardt appeared before the committee asking if the city would call water users on the delinquent list on the 16th of the month telling them that they would have their water shut off on that day. Ron Marshall explained to Mr. Barnhardt that we are not a "babysitting" service and that prior and proper notice had been given. The city had provided the water and service and no further notice is necessary. The committee concurred. Third item of business; Sharon Herman spoke to the committee about proposed change& that the office would like to see made. Attached to these minutes are changes the committee wanted. Meeting adjourned at 6:05 P.M. Re ully submitted, Ron M rshall, acting chairman • ATTACHMENTS: work orders - Rod Nealy Proposed changes to city service procedures ab e'? ? rRII CEIVED! TIME RECEIVED [ORDER NAME BY CITY OF LAUREL 0 TO- ) ACCO NT N0 . Ste` 3 0.? P.O. Box 10, Laurel, MT 58044. 628-8791 / SERVICE ORDER INVOICE CL SERVICE UATE ` TIME NEEDED r I_ OA -b/lJ? SERVICE REOUESTED G PHONE NUMBER HOME: QTY. OFFICE S? r U 2 1 MATERIAL - EOUIPMENT I LABOR CHG. AMOUNT L S-/ MODEL NEW ? • ? AM I • C3 AM • 11 PM • ? PM {?0 ?cz c e ac rrI47-4 ? 10 e t -755 e'e 9.J 992 TOTAL E ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Oro 9-29-94 ROD IS OBJECTING TO THIS CHARGE, HE SAID THIS METER CAME OFF SOME OTHER LOT AND WAS FROZE WHEN WE SET IT. ? HE IS ASKING US TO CANCEL THIS CHARGE. WE BILLED HIM IN MAY AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME HE HAS CALLED ABOUT IT. HE ALSO SAYS THERE ARE ABOUT 10 METERS LAYING AROUND OUT IN VILLAGE SUB ON THE GROUND OR WHATEVER. ? PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF IT'S POSSIBLE THE METER WAS FROZE WHEN WE SET IT. THANKS, JEANETTE MER AUTHORIZATION FOR UTILITY SERVICE EFECEIVEJ TIME RECEIVED "ORDER TAKE ICE.A000UNT NO. - CA I T Vr u+IJK= P.O. Box 10, Laurel, MT 59044 6284791. SERVICE ORDER INVOICE SERVICEDATE E TIME NE EDIED SERVICE REQUESTED 11 NE OFFICE BEA MOMS OTY. MATERIAL • EQUIPMENT / LABOR CHG. AMOUNT .r _ V DATE START TIME STOP TIME 1,9ERV[QEMAN V 1 • ? AM • ? AM 1 ! • ? PM • ? PM IT YA EL SERIAL READING ? REPLACE ? WHY? a-nnvlue renrv?m av e v-) e ? LaJ C o !! i-5 erica e DN d ? of Gf31?a t? e G' I COMMENTS TOTAL CUSTOMER AUTHORIZATION FOR UTILITY SERVICE OFFCE j?-IF !-? AMEND 6 to: Delinquent Water Users: When an account is billed the second month, ADD 9. a shut-off notice shall be attached for the 16th of the following month or the first work day following the 16th. This notice will state that if payment is not made by 8:00 a.m. on the day specified as shut-off day, services will be discontinued WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. No further notices will be given in any situation. All unpaid checks returned to the City from the bank will be re-deposited after the first return. If it.is returned a second time, service will be discontinued until the customer pays the face value of the check plus $15.00 to have service reconnected. The same call-out rule in Rule 7 will apply. 0