Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity/County Planning Board Minutes 03.13.1986February 13, 1986 no quorum March 13, 1986 Meeting of the Laurel-Yellowstone City-County Planning Board called • to order with the following members present: R. M. Williams, Vice President, County Rep. Bus Roberts, City Rep. George Reiter, County Rep. Bob Rosselot, County Rep. Donald Gudgell, County Rep. Darrell Aaby, City Rep. Joe Bradley, City Rep. Members absent: Dr. John Hawley Smith, President, City Rep. Gerald Shay, Member-at-Large, Executive Secretary Marvin Carter, City Rep. Grace Edwards, County Rep. Also present: Cal Cumin, Cumin Associates, Billings John Lapp, Jr., 912 Wyoming Avenue, Laurel Roger and Dwight Bare, 1021 W. 4th St., Laurel Robert C. & Barbara Smith, 928 W. 4th St., Laurel Mary & Kae Fukado, 1202 W. 4th St., Laurel Clyde Bray, 1201 W. 4th St., Laurel Russell Bray, 1121 W. 4th St., Laurel Ray & Margaret 2elka, 4432 Vaughn Ln, Billings Larry E. Miller, Jr., 4188 Morgan, Billings John B. Powers, 1103 E. Main #6, Laurel Teresa Austin, 520 4th Ave., Laurel Minutes of previous meeting amended to show Little Scottie Mobile Home Park approved subject to review of final landscape plan by Cal. Minutes of previous meeting approved as corrected. Bills approved: Public Works Department in the amount of $400.00 for administrative services---February and March, 1986; Cumin Associates for Planning Advisory services for January, February, and March, 1986, as per agreement in the amount of $3,375.00. HOME OCCUPATIONS: Robert Larson, 1011 E. 9th St., dba Bob's Welding Service was not present for the second time. If he wants to pursue a home occupa- tion, he must re-apply. Teresa A. Austin, 5204th Avenue, dba Marlite Distributing, approved subject to understanding that no customers come to her house. Motion from Joe Bradley to recommend approval, second by Bob Rosselot. Carried. John Lapp,_ Jr., 912 Wyoming, dba John's Live Bait, approved subject to understanding that no customers come to his house. Change item #2 on application to answer "no". Motion from Don Gudgell to recommend approval, second by Joe Bradley. Carried. CLARIFY SECTION 17.84.010 and 17.84.070: Joe Bradley says there is no need to clarify. It is a year between every step of process. 0 F • 1 OXYGEN PLANT: Barbara Smith, 928 W. 4th Street, ... and we object to this. They started to make acytelene back in 1980. They built these large pits and approximately 6 mos ago they built another one. It's close to our fence line. It is coming across under the ground like and killing off the grass over there. It's always wet when you walk there, and it is a bad smell in the neighborhood. We object to this, and we would like to find out what can be done about it. Robert Smith, 928 W. 4th Street, I would like to speak in terms of credibility. This plant originally, when they were first under the grandfather clause, said the cylinders contain oxygen and nitrogen and that was about it. There are green barrells scattered all over the place. At the time they spoke to the County Commissioners they mentioned the fact that it would be a beautiful industrial site and that there would be pine trees all around'it. All there is around it is a mess. The issue, I understand, is the fact that they are talking about fire protection when in fact there is no more room for them to put off displaced water. There are 2 pits. There is one down there on Schwab's place. I don't think that's used any more. That one pit was dug deep enough you could have buried my house. That is now full of water. It is my guess that in these green barrells there is calcium carbide, a high desiccant to make acytelene with the addition of water. The by--product is calcium hydroxide which is in fact a very caustic substance. In fact if this plant were to go into the City, I am sure the next step would be sewerage. That is a very caustic substance. Right now this is becoming ground water that has a greenish scum on the top and has an odor, as Mrs. Smith mentioned. No one in the neighborhood wanted that plant since it has been there. It is expanding bit by bit. What are your credentials? About this caustic material, etc.? You're a chemist, is that correct? Robert Smith Yes. So, he's got some expertise in this area. Robert Smith very alkaline. to be moving. The ph in the calcium hydroxide is very high. It's It's very caustic. As a matter of fact, it seems Roger Bare, 1021 W. 4th Street, I Smith, and I didn't know they had water. I think that the water in They've got a bid dike around it. good. It comes right up to Bob's you could put a house in without pit, so there are at least 2 pits contaminates the ground. Are these pits unlined? Barbara Smith live across the street from Bob a pit like that -- that full of the pit is above ground level. It's green and it doesn't smell fence. It is a pit big enough any trouble. Behind it is another there; and I think it probably To our knowledge, they are unlined. Roger Bare No. No. They are just holes in the ground. I can see that much. There is no lining in them, no cement, no plastic. They are just holes in the ground with dikes around them. That's all I can tell you. • Robert Smith The acytelene was not part of the original squeezing } air out of the atmosphere. • Clyde Bray, 1201 W. 4th Street, I don't know whether you fellas know it or not, but that whole area out there is full of underground springs. Every time you permit buildings (school house or anything else) it pushes that water further west. The developers have got the whole thing out there completely soaked. There's no way to get it out. I'm asking you fellas to stop everything until the govern- ment, County, City or State, gets that water out of there before you build any more. If you don't think so, I would like to have each and every one of you at my.place at any given time -- bring your boots, not your car -- I'd like to take you over there and show you just exactly what's going on. Mary Fukado, 1202 W. 4th Street, Everything these people say is right down the list. Barbara Smith I might mention that there were other people planning to attend. One of them is sick. There was an original petition in protest written and given to the City in 1973. Then when they requested the zone change in 1977, twice we handed in petitions. I believe one had 67 signatures and the other had approximately the same amount of signatures. Is there anyone here to speak for the.plant? Ra Zelka 4432 Vaughn Lane, Billings, I'll say what I can. I didn't have enough time to get a man flown in to answer these questions for these people. We have our own people out of Phoenix. I could get a meeting together at their convenience.wherever they want to meet. • These people will fly in to visit them about the problems that are here. First off the pits are unlined. Every acytelene plant that they have uses unlined pits due to the fact that a lime sediment seals off the pit. That's why the water won't go away. We rely.on evaporation to get rid of it. What has happened is we have had a lot of snow and everything filled our pit. Two months ago we found out that the water was well below grade and you could see the lime coating underneath the socalled water. We call it decanted water. Our intent is to use it back into the acytelene system, which we haven't been able to do. Not for this time. But that's still not going to drain the pits as they say. It would be impossible to drain them. Our intention, as I expressed before, would be with Gilmore Lime Co. out of Salt Lake City. They are planning on putting in underground storage tanks and pump the slurry out. By-products of this lime has to be in slurry form before they can pump it. So if they drain it they are going to have to fill it again to slurry it anyway to take it out. It's done in Billings the same way. Now then, as far as the addition to the building, we got approval to put the dock in. The only reason we covered it is because of the last snow storm. It put us behind on delivering gasses to refineries. People who need it couldn't even get the cylinders off the dock. It's only a cover. There is no reason we would ever cover the sides of it at all. The square footage of that plant is the same as when we built it. It has not been changed. Internally what we have been doing is taking out partitions to make more floor space available to put in more animated equipment so that we won't have to have these • men doing this back breaking work. We used to do the palleting by hand. We now have machines to do that. We don't have to tip cylinders by hand. We have a machine to do this. We had to make room inside. With the limitation of the building we had to use the space we had by moving the walls back and whatever we had between the two plants to make enough floor space. There is an odor from it -- no use in denying that. There have never been objections though. It's not nearly as bad as other odors we have in the area. I'm around it so much I don't even notice it. So what can I say? What bothers him might not bother others. I can't tell -- I've been around it too many years, I guess. Are there any more questions? You're the manager? Ray Zelka Yes. Are those pits fenced? Ray Zelka They were until we had - we took out 140 yds of by-product last year and sold it to the sugar refinery down in Lovell. So at that time one side of my fence was torn down and then dumped the lime in the pit. Now I have a bid in with Valley Builders to go clear over to the property line down clear around. We have had a couple of breakins and this might stop some of our breakins. And also, if the looks didn't bother people, we could put slats in this fence which will be a chain link fence. The barrells that blow around I can't help. They have already been damaged. My boys stack those once a week. The wind blows them around. They are very light -- 11 lbs. and holds 45 gals. I tried to give them away to the sanitation departments for putting garbage in. Nobody wants to take them for free so when we get a bunch built up I get a man to come over. He crushes them at night, hauls them away and sells them for scrap in order to make up for the labor it takes to crush them. That's the way we have been getting rid of them. Our intentions of expanding the building "no"; expanding the business "yes." We can not exist without business. The building will not be expanded. I mentioned that to the couple who came over at the time I was building the roof. All that roof is for is for rain and snow protection and in the summertime to keep the hot sun off the cylinders. The gas does expand and wherever we lose safety we lose the product. So that's the process from the outside. That pad was there originally and we got permission from the Council to raise that pad 4 ft. That was done at the time we first started out when all our trucks were pickups and 1 Tons. Now we've got people coming in with semis and they use all kinds of heists to load and unload. Ray, how long have you been the manager? RayZelka 5 yrs. Is that when the plant opened? Ray Zelka No, that's when Liquid Air purchased the property. How long ago was it that you came to the Council for approval? Ra Zelka That would have been approximately 3 yrs ago. You're talking about the loading dock? _RayZelka Yes, the pad was there before and we got permission to bring that up. Did you come before this board? Ray_Zelka No, I think it was a different basis then. It was in this room anyway, but different people. When were the pits first dug? Ray Zelka The time they were put in was around 69, 70 somewhere in there. Barbara Smith The plant was there in 1980. I took pictures of it. No, I didn't bring them with me, but I took pictures. Ray Zelka We'll have to find out because it was before I came. What about the pits that are a block away? Ray Zelka They were dug when this was an acytelene plant and it was done shortly after that. The oxygen stand tank was put in. We never did compress any air. We just brought it in in cylinders. Can you give me a year? When was the acytelene plant started? Ray Zelka I'd have to ask somebody. Was that before your time? Ray Zelka I was in the office at H & R Oxygen at the time. I don't remember what they were doing here. (undistinguishable conversation) Ray Zelka That was all theirs. We dug one pit after that about 2 yrs ago. What is this? Is it a by-product? Ray Zelka Calcium carbide, water and acytelene gas. Acytelene gas is manufactured, added after the original oxygen plant? How much property is the plant sitting on? Ray Zelka The acreage amount to C/S 1330 and C/S 477. This • section here goes all the way from W. 4th Street to Old Highway #10. It narrows after it gets down here about 3blocks. (undistinguishable conversation) How many employees do you have? Ray Zelka four Does that include yourself? Ray Zelka Yes. Barbara Smith May I ask if there's anyone there at night, because I hear all this hissing and stuff like it's going to blow up. I was concerned if there was anyone there that could adjust whatever needs adjusting. Ray Zelka This liquid is a criogenic that actually boils to keep itself cool. As it boils it builds up pressure and these release valves maintain it at a certain temperature. The bulkheads some- times get a little loud. The safety valve - - - - Barbara Smith The people in the neighborhood feel like they are sitting on a keg of dynamite that's ready to explode. Ray Zelka Not unless you can mix hytrogen, oxygen and CO2 together. Barbara Smith All I know is that acytelene is very explosive. Ray Zelka That's in a cabinet cylinder. Ray, what are your long-range plans out there? Ray_Zelka_ Well, what we're hoping for is to have the lime company come in, take care of the pits, level those, and haul that out. It looks like starting about duly. A company over in Billings is shutting down and moving out and has the lime company available to us. We should be able to supply 5000 gals of that a day to them and of far as in the plant - - - These pits will be taken care of by a lime company out of Billings? Ray Zelka No, no. They come out of Salt Lake City -- Gilmore Lime. But you're saying that the pits will be removed possibly in the spring? Ray Zelka No. It will probably be the end of the year. There's a lot of pumping to do. One pit there, the one we're talking about today, is about 12 ft deep on the north end and 8 ft deep on the south end. But your long-range plan is to remove these pits? Ray Zelka Yes. We'll be.doing that in all our plants. So they will be gone by the end of 1986? Ray Zelka We're striving towards that. It all depends on how much Gilmore can do.for us and how much he can sell to the people in the popular areas so he doesn't have to travel so far. We have to take that out of the pit, pile it outside, then he hauls it -- they don't want to take it to the slurry like Exxon does. It may have to dry a little bit so we can haul it down the highway. The highway is the slurry, so it-has to dry a little bit. That's what that pile is south of the one site east right now. That's to be removed by Gilmore's next trip. Then, of course, we'll have to take some more out of the pit and put it there. Is that where the odor comes from, Ray? Ray Zelka Yes, .it's the water. It's kind of a stagnant water and a smell to it. I don't find it objectionable but there is an odor there. Weren't you in to talk about annexation a while back? Ray Zelka Yes. That is pending right at the moment. It is currently with the department in San Francisco. I called the girl last Monday and the paper work is supposed to be completed. What we want to do is try to get City water down there. I don'.t care whether there will be sewer or not. Would you continue to expand on your long-range plans. What other plans do you have out there, Ray? Ray Zelka Well, completely closing in the area with non flammable fence of some nature. The one end exit/entrance will be towards the south. How does water work on a chemical fire like that? Ray Zelka It would work in there due to the fact that all there would be in there would be machinery and cylinders. There is no exposed calcium carbide in that room. But, if one of those cylinders exploded, water is not going to do 0 anything to it, is it? Ray Zelka No, it would be like a propane tank or anything else. It would have to burn its way out. But the cylinder, even though there is no gas in it, it is full of a porous filler. Gas can a only be released out of that cylinder at very small flowings at a time. It's like a sponge -- it absorbs. You can't keep acytelene over 15 lbs per sq. in. in the vessel. If you buy a cylinder that says 250 lbs at the valve you know there has got to be some way to get that, and they do that by adding more cells and that's done through accumulation of cells. You can actually throw an acytelene cylinder in a fire, which has been done on several fires they've had in Billings, and all it does is torch a fire. We have never had one explode yet. I've got them over there burnt to a crisp. We take them all to the insurance companies. They are really safe. The industry is shipping these cylinders every place. They are putting them in private homes, in hospitals, industrial sites, ships, airplanes, everything. They've got to be safe. That's what this equipment we are putting in is for. We check it every 5 yrs. High pressure is to be checked, low pressure every???? What about the hydrogen? Is it the same kind of cylinder setup? Ray Zelka Yes. That's a high pressure cylinder. We tell our filler to take special precautions filling them. As a matter of fact, when they have that in liquid form they usually fill with a towel all around it until the cylinder is full. It blankets the gas. Is the hydrogen cylinder made the same way as the acytelene is? Ray Zelka No. It's a hollow vessel cylinder. It has a safety release on it. A filling to approximately 200 lbs will release at 3360 psi. They have a safety release on the cylinders. We have yet to have a safety release on high on these cylinders. What would happen if they were in a fire? Ray Zelka The cylinder would not explode. Pure gas will not explode. Compare it to a propane tank. Poke a hole in it, light it. It will not explode until it is out of gas. If those hydrogen cylinders were sitting in a very hot fierce fire would they explode? Ray Zelka No. Safety release and the gas would burn off. The safety added is a multiple cord around which expells the gas in all directions to keep the cylinder from travelling, and it is just like a torch. What usually happens it just burns off the safety. Do you feel that you can keep your plant profitable without expanding the plant itself over the years to come? Ray Zelka No. There will be a day when we're going to get out of there. At the moment it is unprofitable for us to move. We were going to move this last year. We talked to the Planning Board last year on some property over here in the industrial site. My people took it back to the home office, analyzed everything and they feel right at the moment that they could just not coordinate the move. As business picks up and we get a little competition in the area, we could end up being sold. It's a survivor the way it looks. Before too long we hope to build a fast-fill plant which would take up twice the room we've got over there and would need an easier locale to get to anyway. They have discussed that. What is the name of your plant? Ray Zelka Liquid Air Corporation of America. I That's headquartered where in this country? Ray Zelka We have our headquarters in California. How many of these plants do you have operating here in the U.S.? Ray Zelka About 800 plants. We're one of the smallest. Have you ever undergone fire inspection out there? Ray Zelka We get them by our insurance company, our safety engineers every 3 mos. The City of Laurel at all? Ray Zelka I've asked them to come over, but they haven't come over yet. So there are in-house inspections by your company.every 3 mos plus the insurance company periodically? Ray Zelka Once a year. So you have in-house inspections every 3 mos; and insurance company inspections once.a year. Do you know what your policy limits are? Ray Zelka Self insured $50,000,000.00 (undistinguishable conversation) .x OK Thank you, Ray. Joe Bradley wants company officials up to delineate long-range plans. Next meeting of Planning Board will have company officials make presentation. Bob Rosselot stated he needs a Planning Board "red" book. NOTE: It is in the engineer's office ready to be picked up at his convenience. Cal Cumin would like aerial photos of Laurel area cost estimate at next meeting. 1986--87 BUDGET: Motion from Bus Roberts, second by Joe Bradley, to submit proposed budget as is. Carried. Bus Roberts asked about a sign ordinance. Cal Cumin distributed letters regarding jurisdictional area. Also presented a proposal to change the Home Occupation ordinance. This will be discussed at the next Planning Board meeting also. Respectfully submitted, Cal Cumin, Pro-tem City of Laurel LAUREL, MONTANA 59044 PUBLIC WORKS P.O. BOX 10 PHONE: 628 -8791 March 13, 1986 DEPARTMENT Mr. Jim Brown Building Code Bureau Department of Commerce Capital Station Helena, MT. 59620 Dear Mr. Brown: In reference to our telephone conversation Wednesday, March 5, 1986, the City of Laurel has issued a building permit, following a request from the Airport Authority, for the con- struction of a hangar at the Laurel Airport. This permit relates to your project number of C-86-13. The Airport Authority made a formal request to the City Council to enforce the building codes on the airport property and, appropriately or not, the request was granted. The City of Laurel will be requesting State approval to enlarge the jurisdictional area for enforcement of the building codes, which will encompass the airport area. At your convenience, please send me a copy of the neces- sary requirements and stipulations for the purpose of enlarging our jurisdictional area. Sincerely, Ofk ames A. Flisrand Director of Public Works JAF /pj cc: Mayor Gauthier City of Laurel is an EEO Employer i r 0a/it 131 &IRM041.0tie • BILLINGS, MONTANA swot COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, ROOM 5O8 HAROLD F. HANSER, COUNTY ATTORNEY (408) 258 -HEN ZWE0 ❑ Criminal Division ❑ Victim/Witness Assistance ❑ Civil Division 0 Chid Support Enforcement ❑ Deferred Prosecution February 27, 1986 John Hawley Smith Laurel - Yellowstone City - County Planning Board City of Laurel Laurel, Montana 59044 Re: Extension of Planning Board Jurisdictional Boundaries Dera Mr. Smith: I have forwarded your letter of February 5th to the County Commissioners. The notice of intent prepared by attorney Joe Bradley is acceptable as to form. If it has not already been done, there will need to be a certification that the signatures on the petition constitute 5% or more of the resident freeholders in the area proposed for inclusion in the jurisdictional area of the planning board. Sincerely, c David W. Hoefer, Deputy County At orney DWH /cr cc: County Commissioners Cit y of Laurel LAUREL, MONTANA 59044 PLANNING P.O. BOX 10 PHONE: 628 -8791 DEPARTMENT February 5, 1986 Mr. Harold Hanser Yellowstone County Attorney P0B 35025 Billings, MT 59107 Dear Mr. Hanser: In April 1985, the Laurel - Yellowstone City- County Planning Board submitted a petition to the County Commissioners to change the jurisdictional bound- aries of the Laurel Board; this new boundary was determined after much discussion with the Billings - Yellowstone City - County Planning Board and was the boundary mutually agreed upon (see attached letters from the County Planning Director). I believe the Commissioners then turned the petition over to the County Clerk and Recorder who in turn submitted it to your office for evaluation. After that, nothing has been heard. The Laurel City Attorney has prepared the documentation for the desired hearing on the boundary change, including the detailed geographic descrip- tion of the area involved. Accordingly, I do not believe there is any new work that has to be done other than for your office to just review the existing documents. I would like to point out that the petition submitted constituted at least fifty percent of the resident freeholders of the area in question and not just the five percent as required by 76-1-505, RCM. Laurel at least deserves the courtesy of some sort of reply from the County. If you would shed some light on why the initial petition' is being held up, it would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, John Hawley Smith, DDS Chairman, Laurel - Yellowstone City - County Planning Board Attached: Copy of original petition Support letter, Laurel Planning Board Support letter, City of Laurel Laurel Planning Director letter to County Clerk Billings Planning Director letters to Laurel and to County Commissioners City of Laurel is an EEO Employer Section 17.44.O10.B. PROPOSED ADDITION TO "HOME OCCUPATION SECTION" OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE (3/13/86) B. Home occupation: (1) Home occupation is permitted in a dwelling customarily incidental to the principal use as a dwelling subject to the following limitations: a. No person other than .a member of the immediate family occupying a dwelling -is.emp'oyed, except domestic help. b. No stock in trade is displayed or sold upon the premises. c. No alteration of the principal building changes the character thereof as a dwelling. d. No illuminated sign is used, and no sign other than one giving the name and occupation, and not more than one square foot in area, is displayed. e. No more than 25 percent of the area of one story 7 of the building is devoted to the home occupation. f. No equipment shall be used in such a home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, r r g r s or electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible inter- ference in any radio or television receivers off the premises. g. The home occupation shall be deemed to be both site specific and owner specific; thus, the use of a por- tion of a structure as a home occupation will not permit a subsequent owner an automatic home occupa- (2) The following activities are prohibited from home occupation under this section: a. Motor and motorized vehicle or boat repair of any kind to include body and engine work, upholstery and glass repair, and audio system work. 7 b. Prefabrication of building construction components such p as, but not limited to, cabinets and heating and cooling systems. c. Furniture and appliance sales, repair, or renovation. d. Manufacturing of any food products for barter or sale. e. Generally all those uses specifically and already allowed and provided for in Laurel's CoMmercial and Industrial Zoning Districts as delineated in Section 17.32 of this Ordinance. • "'N DATE: gt?'i' / ' APPLICATION FOR CITY BUSINESS LICENSE 1. NAME OF BUSINESS TO BE LICENSED Age 1 l✓�- { A d s />: 2. ADDRESS OF DESCRIBED BUSINESS "e1J -mac' 3. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY TO BE LICENSED &)'-0 !t. CITY OR COUNTY OF LAST LICENSE d -14 ty %/ c-=j * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1. NAME OF APPLICANT /Tf'. ' J 7 •-•ecr - - - 2. _ BIRTFIDATE�r =' - 74 : 1- 7 /1 / - r -- - - -- - -- - - - - - -- 3. S S NUMBER 5'7 �- 5Y !i. HOME ADDRESS - 'a' 01 /e//,__* 5. TELEPHONE NUMBER d,.1 ; y 6. A FEE OF $10.00 REQUIRED FOR FIRE INSPECTION. Name of Applicant Cotmniti Police Chief C ti 1 "' t ` Fire Chief Commits Date Committee Met and Action Taken Conuniti Date of Council Approval Date License Issued LAUREL- YELLOWSTONE CITY - COUNTY PLANNING BOARD LAUREL. MONTANA 59041 C HOME OCCUPATION REQUEST FORM Date c�4 <� ��� Name , ,e5;96 Cq <� S� • Address47)' go‘ Phone Description of proposed home occupation: • • Please answer the following questions by indicating yes or no. If your response is yes, please explain. 1. Will any person other than a member of the immediate family occupying the dwelling be employed, except domestic help? 2. Will any stock in trade be displayed or sold upon the premises?_, 3. Will the character of the principal building be altered from that of a dwelling? ° 4. Will any illuminated signs be used? W Information: Law dictates that no sign other than one giving the name and occupation, and not more than one square foot in area be displayed. 5. Will more than 25 percent of the area of one story of the building be devoted to the home occupation? 4t 6. Will any equi ment be used in the home occupation which creates El vibration, a e fumes, odors, or electrisia4 interference? ye4 s° or 6 �,�re�� 7. Will any equipment dr process be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises? /e'• Information Home occupations are deemed to be both site specific and owner specific: n • CITY OF LAUREL HOME ACCUPATI )N RLQUEST FORM Page 2 thus, the use of a portion of a structure as a home occupation will not permit a subsequent owner an automatic home occupation designation. Procedure 1. Complete home occupation request form and submit it to the City seven (7) working days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board. • • 2. The Planning Board will consider the request at their regu- larly scheduled meeting. Attendance at this meeting is required by the applicant or his /her representative. 3. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the City Council that the specific request for a home occupation designation be granted or denied. 4. The City Council will consider the Planning Board's recom- mendation concerning the specific home occupation designation and approve or deny it at their next regularly scheduled meeting. Attendance by the applicant or his /her represent- ative is required at this meeting. Sketch In the space below, please provide a rough sketch with basic dimen- sions showing the location of your business in your home in relation to the other areas in your home. Incluie any storage area the business may require. • 0 DATE: ,>> APPLICATION FOR CITY BUSINESS LICENSE 1. NAME OF BUSINESS TO BE LICENSED /,n 2. ADDRESS OF DESCRIBED BIISINESS j ,1 � � rt {� - 1(, l 3. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY TO BE LICENSED (-p ,. )C . T I/ is. CITY OR COUNTY OF LAST LICENSE L c, - -t J e 1 . • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1. NAME OF APPLICANT % e ( ,-/-1 • 2. BIRTHRATE 1/ _ = 3. s S NUMBER , - 7) - 't') PL. cc 4. H O M E A D D R E S S 5 - ) 0 2 -11 1 /1 ,4/.4 l C L f / F i 5. TELEPFANE NUMBER /(,-,,) ( .- ,Sl 3- 13-4. 6. A FEE OF $10.00 REQUIRED FOR FIRE INSPECTION. Name of Applicant Committee Chairman Police Chief Committee Member hire Chief Committee Member Date Committee Met and Action Taken Committee Member Date of Council Approval Date License Issued • . n n LAU R EL- YELLOWSTO N E CITY- COUNTY PLANNING BOARD _' LAUREL. MONTAMA • NOME OCCUPATION REQUEST FORM • Date c ) - 4 - ° Name Te re sr? At _154;1"1 Address 3 zi/1-1 i t) p , Phone /, ` e! till . c a Description of proposed home occupation: - J Please answer the following questions by indicating yes or no. If your response is yes, please explain. 1. Will any person other than a member of the immediate family occupying 4 the dwelling be employed, except domestic help? PO 2. Will any stock in trade be displayed or sold upon the premises ?Llr 3. Will the character of the principal building be altered from that of a dwelling? t)() 4. Will any illuminated signs be used? Information: Law dictates that no sign other than one giving the name and occupation, and not more than one square foot in area be displayed. 5. Will more than 25 percent of the a ea of one story of the building be devoted to the home occupation? VC 6. Will any equipment be used in the home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference? i t)() 7. Will any equipment dr process be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises? • IU O - Information Home occupations are deemed to be both site specific and owner specific: CITY OF LAUREL HOME ACCUPATI % RLQUEST FORM Page2 thus, the use of a portion of a structure as a home occupation will not permit a subsequent owner an automatic home occupation designation. Procedure • 1. Complete home occupation request form and submit it to the City seven (7) working days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board. 2. The Planning Board will consider the request at their regu- larly scheduled meeting. Attendance at this meeting is required by the applicant or his /her representative. • 3. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the City Council that the specific request for a home occupation - designation be granted or denied. 4. The City Council will consider the Planning Board's recom- mendation concerning the specific home occupation designation and approve or deny it at their next regularly scheduled meeting. Attendance by the applicant or his /her represent- ative is required at this meeting. Sketch In the space below, please provide a rough sketch with basic dimen- sions showing the location of your business in your home in relation to the other areas in your home. Inclule any storage area the business may require. • • t31't' N D - 0) • L ► VI - DATE: -2- /9 S • APPLICATION FOR CITY BUSINESS LICENSE 1. NAME OF BUSINESS TO BE LICENSED C Nei, `- / / Z ,<1 /7 _ 2. ADDRESS OF DESCRIBED BUSINESS (/_,2 7 ` ,4 C'L" . - 3. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY TO BE LICENSED -7 It. CITY OR COUNTY OF LAST LICENSE -yr _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1. NAME OF APPLICANT cJ C H ti_ l 4/V 2 . BIRTHRATE /- 3-0-- 5 e- 3. S S N U M B E R / ? It. HOME ADDRESS `/ /2 kc . R V 5. TELEPHONE NUMBER (- ) S. b 11 6. A FEE OF $10.00 REQUIRED FOR FIRE INSPECTION. f ;7 21 of Applicant Committee Chairman Police Chief Committee Member Fire Chief Committee Member Date Committee Met and Action Taken Committee Member Date of Council Approval Date License Issued LAU R EL-YELLOWSTO N E CITY- COUNTY PLANNING BOARD LAUREL, MONTANA 59044 HOME OCCUPATION REQUEST FORM Date Name L 6' 0 / 4 /i 77,C Address / /).. /AU L ' Phone 62 b=-- 6 (S' e Description of proposed home occupation: Please answer the following questions by indicating yes or no. If your response is yes, please explain. 1. Will any person other than a member of the immediate family occupying the dwelling be employed, except domestic help? , v 2. Will any stock in trade be displayed or sold upon the premises? ^/p 3. Will the character of the principal building be altered from that of a dwelling? N 4. Will any illuminated signs be used? / Information:. Law dictates that no sign other than one giving the name and occupation, and not more than one square foot in area be displayed. 5. Will more than 25 percent of the area of one story of the building be devoted to the home occupation? NC 6. Will any equipment be used in the home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical interference? /V 7. Will any equipment �r process be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television receivers off the premises? NC Information Home occupations are deemed to be both site specific and owner specific; r CITY OF LAUREL HOME ACCUPATION REQUEST FORM t Page 2 thus, the use of a portion of a structure as a home occupation will not permit a subsequent owner an automatic home occupation designation. Procedure 1. Complete home occupation request form and submit it to the City seven (7) working days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board. 2. The Planning Board will consider the request at their regu- larly scheduled meeting. Attendance at this meeting is required by the applicant or his /her representative. 3. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the City Council that the specific request for a home occupation designation be granted or denied. 4. The City Council will consider the Planning Board's recom- mendation concerning the specific home occupation designation and approve or deny it at their next regularly scheduled meeting. Attendance by the applicant or his /her represent- ative is required at this meeting. Sketch In the space below, please provide a rough sketch with basic dimen- sions showing the location of your business in your home in relation to the other areas in your home. Include any storage area the business may require. � I L_ •