The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPublic Comments through 2.3.2024 Brittney Harakal _ From: Ward to Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 2:43 PM To: Bhttney Harakal Cc: Civil Attorney Subject: FW: Proposed Mental Health Facility and City Council Considerations Attachments: Mental Health Facility Concerns (1).docx Sara B. Naylor t'IA Mt.tlLJIL L ('I( of ImUrd \C nnlI + IX'rvUupnlauLiakxn From:Tricia Tatman <ptatman27@gmall.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 3,2026 2:13 PM To: Ward 1B <wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward IA<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A <ward2a@laurel.mLgov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mtgov>;Ward 4A <ward4a@laurel.mt.govr,Ward 4B<ward4b@laurel.mt.gov>; citymayor@laurel.mt Subject: Proposed Mental Health Facility and City Council Considerations Please see the attached letter concerning the proposed Mental Health Facility Sincerely, Patricia Tatman Yellowstone County resident of the Laurel Community t February 3`°, 2026 To: Laurel City Council Members and Mayor From: Patricia Tatman Subject: Proposed Mental Health Facility in or near Laurel, MT Dear Valued City Council Members and Mayor Waggoner, As I assume much of your correspondence is these days, I am writingto address the proposed Mental Health Facility in the area. While I am a county resident, and none of you directly represent me, it is the county residents that will likely feel the brunt of the decisions that are on your shoulders. I appreciate the time it will take you to review this letter, as well as the correspondence of others. In short, my household is opposed to the proposed Mental Health Facility being at either identified location in Laurel(the property of Hwy 10 that has a buy/sell agreement, and the State -owned property off of Buffalo Trail and Lau rel Airport Rd). We do recognize and appreciate that there is an extreme need in Montana for more access to mental health facilities,the problems with existing forensic mental health facilities, and the shortage of space in both our county jails and our State penitentiaries. That said a band-aide solution to a large problem generally leads to larger problems, instead of solving the recognized problem. I will bring up the ones that are on my mind and hope you will consider them when makingyour decisions. #1. This has been shrouded in secrecy from the very beginning. While I am not naive enough to believe that all decisions are made fully in the public light,this decision has huge implications for the community and public support should have been considered and gauged before any employee or elected official ever entered into discussion or agreements onthistopic. Moving forward atallat this point will leave a huge distrust with the community consisting of your constituents and your county neighbors. 2. The Hwy 10location is just so close to town. This has been amain talking point among community members. I realize the State's desire for cost savings based on existing water and sewer, the location to the West End interchange and its benefits for getting both users of the facility, and employees of the facilityto and from there. However, conveniences and cost savings are not the only factors that should be considered. The proximity to an elementary school, the interstate and highway in general, established homes, and businesses should all be considered security risks. Considerable consideration should also be given to reduction in property values, the overall strange aesthetic of putting a facility of this kind near a golf course and school and what this means as Laurel's growth continues to be planned for. 3. The Laurel Airport Location- I realize this is state owned land and while I don't know all that would go into putting the proposed facility here, I am sure it would be less restrictive than having to be annexed by the city. My understanding of the situation was that this was deemed less feasible due to available water and sewer, and the extreme cost that would be needed to develop those utilities. The city should NEVER be responsible for upgrading these utilities solely for a State facility that will provide no tax revenue. Additionally, other considerations should be discussed. This is right next to an increasingly busy airport, which seems to also be a security risk. Laurel Airport is in no condition to facilitate more traffic. This highway is quite narrow and has wrecks on a regular basis that would be exacerbated by both the building of and running of this facility. It is my view as well that it would be in incredibly poor taste to put this facility right next to ou r city cemetery and our increasingly used State Veteran's Cemetery. While a school is a bit further away than the Hwy 10 location, it is essentially a straight shot right to our high school, our health clinic and a nursing home. 4. If this facility is built at either location it will be the first thing visitors see when coming from either the west or the north. What will that do to the health of our community. Even the fact that our school mascot is the Laurel Locomotives, often shortened to Locos, seems that this facility will do nothing but bring a certain negative perception to our town. 5.This is just Phase 1 of a project. This is probably my area of greatest concern. Whatwill come of subsequent phases. It is known we have a severe shortage of mental health facilities both forensic and otherwise. Will this grow to include more patients/prisoners? We know we lack county jail space. Is this a plan for getting more? We know we have shortage of incarceration space in our State run prisons. Are these sites being looked at to help solve those problems? To my knowledge these questions haven't been answered or even addressed, and they certainly haven't been addressed with any kind of legally binding assurances of whatwill or won't happen in the future. Will patients ever be released into the community? Will this bring in other state or privately run group homes or prerelease centers? What will be the city council's stance on them? Where will those be located? What will the security concerns be for those? In closing, I want to fully disclose that I have previously worked in a group home facility and that I also live on Laurel Airport Rd. I come viewing this situation both with the recognition of the extreme need we have in this state, but with also the deeply held belief that these are both wrong locations for any such proposed facility or this type of development. Not from a "not in my backyard" mentality, but because they are categorically the wrong kind of locations for such facilities for so many serious reasons. Thank you for your time and service and I wish you great calm and wisdom as you make further decisions! Patricia Tatman Yellowstone County based Laurel Resident Brittney Harakal From: Ward 1B Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:18 PM To: Brittney Harakal Cc: Civil Attorney; Kurt Markegard Subject: Fw:Annexation of property for Forensic Mental Hospital From:Gloria Allwin<gallwin@msn.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:10 PM To:Ward 3A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 2B <ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<warc13b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4A <ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4B<ward4b@laurel.mt.gov> Subject:Annexation of property for Forensic Mental Hospital To the Laurel City Council Members: While we are not Laurel City residents,we are longterm Laurel residents Livingjust outside the city.We Live at 185 Golf Course Rd, bordering the property being discussed aboutthe Forensic Criminal Mental Hospital. We appreciate your wiltingness to serve our community.We respectfully ask that you do not approve the annexation of the property into the city. The city has talked about growth and wanting to improve the city, however we do not see putting a facility like this being an improvement and not paying taxes to the county or the city.The idea it is so close to our K-2 elementary school is very concerning for our children's safety.This property could be used fortaxable homes and with that,the city could grow helping with the tax base and supporting our schools, streets,water system, etc. With this type of facility being so close in the city li mits, it will impede proper growth for the city and most likely cause the homes in the area to devalue as well. The lack of Transparency by the city officials has been very concerning. Even though we don't have a vote in the city,the annexation of this "prison" does affect us as does your votes. Please do not vote for the annexation of this property. Thankyou. Gloria and Dennis ALlwin t Brittney Harakal From: Ward 113 Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 12:20 PM To: Civil Attorney Cc: Kurt Markegard Subject: Fw: Frustrations and Disappointment From:SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM <SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 4:50 AM To: Ward 1A<ward1a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 213 <ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4A <wardla@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 48<ward4b@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Fw: Frustrations and Disappointment From: SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM <SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM> Sent:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 4:06 PM To:ward la@laumimt.gov<wardla@laurelmt.gov>; wardlb@laurelmt.gov<wardlb@laurelmt.gov>; ward2a@laumlmt.gov<wardla@laurelmt.gov>; ward2b@laurelmtgov<ward2b@laurelmt.gov>; ward3a@laurelmt.gov <ward3a@laurelmt.gov>; ward3b@laurelmt.gov<ward3b@laurelmt.gov>; ward4a@laurelmt.gov <ward4a@laurelmt.gov>; ward4b@laurelmtgov<ward4b@laurelmtgov> Subject: Frustrations and Disappointment Good Afternoon, Thank you for you r time and dedication to our community. We all have lives, businesses,jobs, families, groups, and organizations, so the time we all put forth for our community is admirable. I know you are unable to respond but please take our emails, conversations and facts into considers when making this massive decision that will forever impact our community. I would like to state I am not against this facility or any other facility helping those with severe or mild mental illness, special needs and addiction. These are very real Lives for more people than we know, and all these people deserve help. However, I am against the current proposed location for many reasons. But Today l am writing to you all, about my heart. My family ancestors settled here in 1883 and have been here ever since. I have lived in Laurel for 49 years, raised children here, this is MY HOME, this is MY COMMUNITY. I also opened my business to give this community something it so desperately needed; more places to eat. In addition, I have spent the last 3 years trying to BETTER our community. Joining forces on the Splash Park, working with the Laurel Community Foundation on creating a family friendly space for live music and fellowship at Rock the Block Events. I have had numerous fundraisers for the Laurel Softball Complex, Chamber of Commerce, Laurel Fire Association, as well as all the Laurel City Emergency Services that are so underfunded. Lastly, my non-profit the WHITE BUFFALO FOUNDATION has held numerous events to raise funds for an addition to one of the parks for physically and mentally disabled individuals; including those with all sorts of special needs. 1 It saddens me, breaks my heart, and makes me ill to see something Like the Montana State Forensic Hospital being so close to our recently updated elementary school, softball complexes, residents and the community we claim we love. This is my plea to vote NO to the annexation of the proposed Forensic Mental Hospital/Facility in its proposed location. Sincerely, Shawna Hopper Concerned Citizen, Lifelong Resident, Business Owner 406.794.7222 2 Brittney Harakal From: Ward 4A Sent: Thursday,January 29, 2026 4:07 PM To: Brinney Harakal Subject: FW:Concerns From:SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM <SHAWNA@CARLTONDEPOT.COM> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 6:09 AM To: Ward SA<wardia@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1B<wardlb@Iaurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4B<ward4b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4A <ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; ward2b@laurelmt.gov; Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>; Civil Attorney<civilattorney@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Concerns Good Morning Council, As you are wail aware, I oppose the Montana State Forensic Hospital/Prison at the proposed location in Laurel,for many reasons. The city of Laurel struggles with finances; we have fundraisers for an ambulance,the City of Laurel's ambulance, protective vests for the police force, bunker gear, new safety equ ipment and PPE for the Fire Department. Why? Because the city does not have the funds. This property could have provided commercial and residential income forthe city but know it will not bring income and will become a financial burden in one way or another. Another great option would have been a new Emergency Services Facility as the current facility is in shambles, leaking roofs causing the potential for electrical issues, the heat and air duct is constantly going out, there are many safety issues in the dispatch and police area (which I will not speak publicly about as l do not want to endanger them in any way). Red Lodge Fire was just awarded 2 million dollars from the state for a new station as bunker gear should not be in the same bays as the trucks for exhaust and potential risks for cancer; guess where Laurel's gear is, yap in the same bay. The list could go on. We operate on a very minimally paid fire department,who risk their lives, sacrifice time awayfrom family on holidays for our community and its citizens. This stipend paid department covers one of the largest areas in the state will now have to have special training and additional risks on calls that will likely occur at the facility. When there are calls at this facility, it will pull from all Emergency Services, leaving the residents and communitywith less resources. This will directly impact our community. The safety of our community, emergency services, and our children should be on the front of everyone's mind. At the school board meeting(please watch the video play to get exact quotes and names of individuals) a few comments struck a chord with me. Board Member, Kayla Gray made a comment in regards to her student teaching time; "children would be scared to go to the bathroom alone;this will add another Level of fear, resulting in less productivity in the classroom", one of the student board appointee made a comment about the youth softball training facility directly bordering the proposed location; stating the safety of all Laurel students should be of u pmost importance. Two ladies during public t comment stated a few facts about escapees from warm springs over the lest several years. However, Amber Zahn's comments stuck with me the most; she stated, "it doesn't matter how frequent the escapes are it just takes ONE, one escapee to hurt one of our children or citizens." During the September 30th, "Candidate Meet and Greet" meeting at the Front Porch with the Small Business Alliance Group, questions were asked of Mayor Waggoner about the proposed Facility. Mayor Waggoner stated the state of Montana had asked what the city of Lau rat would do to bring the facility to Laurel, and he said absolutely NOTHING,the city will not give them anything. Well, it appears from the communication released bythe State of Montana on August 22, 2025.The Mayor and CAD had been offering advice and working with them anyways; even if it was just a location,they were encouraging them to look in our community. Asa business owner, my main question was about how this would affect the business community in Laurel, i.e.. pullingjobs from Local businesses that already struggle to findhelp. He acknowledged this as a real risk that could directly affect my business. Whywoulditbe good for the community to take away jobs from one place to add to another? Is the state hospital more imports nt to the city than mine? As of now the fear has grown, as it is not just losing employees but customers as well. People will sell and although someone else may move in, I now have to figure out how capture them as a new customer; less people eat out in fear their property values will decrease. We have a desolate main street already, and this will continue to discourage people from coming to our community. Laurel wiLL continue to struggle instead of encouraging real businesses to come to Laurel that would bring real money to the community and city. I could go on but III save the rest for next week as this is truly exhausting, physically, mentally and emotionally as this affects me to my core. This affects me personally on so many levels as our property the borders this facility, my business will be affected and my husband and son's safety as well as many other first responders I care about will be directly impacted. Please oppose this location and stand up for OUR community. Thank you for your time, Shawna Hopper Concerned Citizen and Business Owner 2 Brittney Harakal From: Ward I Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 8:53 PM To: Civil Attorney Cc: Brittney Harakal; Kurt Markegard Subject: Fw: Forensic Mental Health Facility Attachments: GovLetter_BOI.pdf From: Laura Kirschenmann<lauradrschenmann@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 6:15 PM To: citymayor@laurelmt.gov<citymayor@laurelmt.gov>; michele@meridianlawmt.com <michele@meridianlawmt.com>; Kurt Markegard<kmarkegard@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1A<ward1a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1a <wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A <ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4B <wa rd4b @la urel.mt.gov> Subject: Forensic Mental Health Facility Good evening, I am writing to you all to express my opposition to the currently proposed location for the forensic mental health facility. Myfamily lives at 939 W 4th St. I have lived in Laurel for roughly 13 years, however my husband and his family have been in Laurel and heavily involved in the community for decades. I love Laurel and am grateful to be raising my son in this town. It is hard to find a gem to call. home that we have here, with that small town vibe where you really feel safe and surrounded by a supportive community. I am deeply concerned with what the consequences may be by bringingthis facility to Laurel. First and foremost, the currently proposed location is far too close to Laurel Elementary School. My next largest concern is the strain this would put on our emergency services. I am sure you all are aware of our thinly stretched volunteer ambulance and fire departments. I have heard countless calls on the scanner where our ambulance was either already out on a call, or no one was available to answer the call.This type of facility will undoubtedly have plenty of instances where calls will be placed needing the assistance of emergency personnel. I fear bringing this type of facility that will need support from our strained emergency services could endanger the citizens of Laurel at their most desperate times of need.Without having a 24/7 fully staffed fire and ambulance department, I feel this is putting all the citizens of Laurel at great risk. I begyou all to please do everything within your power to keep this facility out of Laurel. Governor Gianforte was clear in his letter dated 9110/2025, that due to the impact this facility will have on whichever community it is built in, it is imperative that there be public participation and engagement. I kindly ask that the public is included/invited into the decision making and discussions, as much as possibly allowed, of this project before moving forward as our Governor strongly encouraged. 1 Over the course of the last few months,this project has gained the attention of many th the Public,both because of the great need for the proposed facility aM because its location impacts their cornrtunities.In proceeding with this project,public paniciPslion should play a critical role as it moves forward.Engaging the public and smkchohlers will ensure that these decisions are made in the open,allowing Montanans ro have a voice in how their hard-earned tax dollars are spent. As the Board moves expeditiously to resume implementation of House Bill 5,I encourage BOI to work closely with DPHHS during the development of the behavioral health facility plan to specify services to be provided at the&CAlly and ensure than the public has an opportunity to be heard While the budding is to be constructed by BOI,it is important that DPHNS work closely alongside the Board so that the facility meets the hebavioral health needs of Montanans.To ensure that all interested corrwuwties have the opportunity to provide feedback.I also encourage the Board to work with DPHHS to consider additional locatimu beyond the previously reviewed site. I appreciate each and everyone of you and the hard work you put in everyday for our community. I would be happy to speak further with anyone if you so wish. Take care, Laura Kirschenmann 281-813-9679 2 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR STATE OF MONTANA GROG GIAWORTE L{RlsasN JURAs GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOR ra September 10, 2025 Montana Board of Investments PO Box 200126 Helena, MT 59620-0126 Dear Members of the Montana Board of Investments, Thank you for the brief pause you have placed on developing and constructing the behavioral health facility contemplated by House Bill 5, which the Legislature passed and I signed into law. At the most recent meeting of the Board of Investments (BOI), the Board requested written guidance from my office about how to best proceed with implementing House Bill 5 so that we can continue addressing the behavioral health challenges across our state. As you know, House Bill 5 provided$26.5 million to BOI to prepare and build a behavioral health facility in Eastern Montana in coordination with the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) as an investment for the State. Under the law, the Legislature directed BOI and DPHHS to prepare a plan for facility type and location subject to approval by the Director of the Governor's Office of Budget and Program Planning. Over the worse of the last few months, this project has gained the attention of many in the public, both because of the great need for the proposed facility and because its location impacts their communities. In proceeding with this project, public participation should play a critical role as it moves forward. Engaging the public and stakeholders will ensure that these decisions are made in the open, allowing Montanans to have a voice in how their hard-earned tax dollars are spent. As the Board moves expeditiously to resume implementation of House Bill 5, 1 encourage BOI to work closely with DPHHS during the development of the behavioral health facility plan to specify services to be provided at the facility and ensure that the public has an opportunity to be heard. While the building is to be constructed by BOI, it is important that DPHHS work closely alongside the Board so that the facility meets the behavioral health needs of Montanans. To ensure that all interested communities have the opportunity to provide feedback, I also encourage the Board to work with DPHHS to consider additional locations beyond the previously reviewed sites. This project is of great importance to the State of Montana, as DPHHS must continue to build out capacity to take cue of Montanans in need of behavioral health services. I share the goals of STAB CAPHOL • P.O. BOX 200801 • HELENA. MOM'ANA 59620-0801 1$LEPHONE: 406-444-3111 • FAx: 406-444-5529 1 WEB=S: WAW.W.GOV Board of Investments September 10,2025 Page 2 the Legislature to complete this project quickly while also ensuring transparency,fairness, and public involvement. Thank you to each member of the Board for their work on this important project. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to my office. Sincerel J ./ Gre S+pi8 /�yf Governor Brittney Harakal From: Civil Attorney Sent: Friday,January 30, 2026 12:56 PM To: Brittney Hamkal; Kurt Markegard;City Mayor Subject Fw: Bepstt Regards, Michele L. Braukmann Civil City Attorney City of Laurel Cell Phone: 406.671.4333 civilattornev@ la u rel.mt.cov From: Ward 1A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov> Sent: Friday,January 30, 2026 7:41:12 AM To: Brittney Harakal <bharakal@lauml.mt.gov> Cc:Civil Attorney<civilattorney@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: FW: Tent messages I received Wednesday, January 28, 2026 and my response to them. Sara B. Nab-tor [',wnxt.Kfudmr Cm. „n.,nna nffinl l . 405awQ� ♦ H nrl h"III chin knrr From:Sara Naylor<sarabnaylor@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,January 30,2026 7:40 AM To: Ward SA<wardla@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: t 7:38 A • W. © ' +1 (860) 771-3511 ) TeKt Message - RCS wedrestlay 4:51 PM Hi Sara! Quick question for you. I live in Laurel, wondering how you feel about being removed from all city accounts, with the CAO now handling oversight. Before I make a big deal out of the tail end of last night's meeting for people, I figured I'd reach out to you directly and get yourtake. W. 1, .. . Good evening, thank you for reaching out. I'm a relatively new city council member as I just came on board this month. I'm not entirely sure how these matters are typically handled within the city from a policy standpoint. I would encourage you to reach out to the mayor or city clerk treasurer with regard to any questions or clarification on this matter. Again, thank you and I hope you have a good evening. Sara B. Naylor n n l'i�rrc clncrorI E it ndhng.l rt. Prvnrrman Nrlvb .Um<L:J Laurr I Fro 6h we ♦ 4IR.3ffi WIIN i vrmnp4n�uyaw4„in ♦ rm 4r'�G9�Mtlliryl�n��m - s w:,.bi Gn4nuv Lrv,um 3 Brittney HaraIr CiTy Mayor I� Monday, February 2, 2026 1:12 PM Brittney Harakal FW: Concerns regarding the Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Location in Laurel nave Waggpwer Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406) 628-8456 extension 5501 From: Bethany Haan <bethany_haan@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday,January 22, 2026 11:34 AM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject:Concerns regarding the Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Location in Laurel Dear Mayor Waggoner, I am writing to you as a deeply concerned resident of Laurel and an active member of our community regarding the recent site selection for the new state behavioral health facility. While I recognize and support the commitment to addressing Montana's critical need for mental health infrastructure,I am writing to formally express my opposition to the specific location currently under consideration. My concerns are centered on the facility's proximity to established residential neighborhoods and educational institutions. My family resides off Laurel Golf Course Road,placing this planned site a mere 1.6 miles from our front door. Even more concerning is the fact that this facility—intended to house individuals requiring forensic mental health assessments, fitness-to-stand-trial evaluations,and those found guilty but mentally ill—would be located just one mile from Laurel Elementary School. As a mother of four,with two children currently attending that elementary school,the safety and security of our students and neighborhoods are my highest priorities. Placing a high-security forensic population in such close proximity to school-aged children and densely populated residential areas presents risks that I believe have not been fully mitigated or addressed in the current planning phase. I understand that the state Is fulfilling a vital mandate to improve our mental health system. However,for a project of this sensitivity,the choice of location is as important as the services provided. I respectfully ask that you exercise your oversight to pause this selection and reevaluate alternative sites that do not infringe upon the immediate safety zones of our schools and local families. 1 Our community Is supportive of progress, but we ask that this progress does not come at the expense of the peace of mind and safety of Laurel's residents.Thank you for your time,your leadership,and your consideration of this urgent matter. Respectfully, Bethany Haan Laurel, Montana 2 Brittney Harakal From: Ward 1 B Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 1220 PM To: Civil Attorney Cc: Kurt Markegard Subject: Fw: mental hospital letter attached Attachments: mental health facility-jan 2026.pdf From: Don Smarsh <don@dynamicpromoproducts.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 7:38 AM To:citymayor@laure.mt.gov<citymayor@laure.mt.gov>; Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2B <ward21b@laurel.mt.gov>; Laurel Chamber<laurelchamber@laurelmontana.org>; Kurt Markegard <kma rkega rd @ I a u re I.mt.gov> Subject: mental hospital letter attached Thank you for your time. Please review us on Google httes://e oaee/r/CaSBBzGGW I45EB0/review Don Smarsh Phone: 406-628-4718 Tall Free: 800-628-7795 Cell: 406-208-5358 Giving You A � Dynil i k D gns BETTER IMAGE HIM 1�� Since 1993 dynamicoromooroducts com ridamountain com 206 1st Ave, Laurel, Montana 59044 Hours: 8:30am - 5:30pm, Monday-Friday Mailing: PO Box 249, Laurel, Montana 59044 1 Brittney Ha kal r_1 , Eg Ciry Mayor Monday, February 2, 2026 117 PM Brittney Harakal ,„i- FW: mental hospital letter attached Attachments: mental health facility -jan 2026.pdf nave waggoner Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Don Smarsh <don@dynamicpmmoproducts.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 7:44 AM To:The Front Porch<thefrontporchmt@gmail.com>;City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Laurel Chamber <laurelchamber@laurelmontana.org> Subject: mental hospital letter attached Thank you for your time. Please review us on Google bttes:Hg.paze/r/CaSBBzGGW145EBO/review Don Smarsh Phone: 406-62"718 Toll Free: 800-628-7795 Cell: 406-208-5358 1 Givfng You A Dynamic Designs BETTER IMAGE RID G 1 _J Since 1993 Z dlmamicoromooroducts.com ridgmountain.com 206 let Ave, Laurel, Montana 590" Hours: 8:30am - 5:30pm, Monday-Friday Mailing: PO Box 249, Laurel, Montana 59044 1 January 29, 2026 To: Laurel Mayor and City Council From: Don Smarsh Re: State Mental Health Facility Mywife and I live at 1940 Ranch Trail Road in Yellowstone Countyjust outside of Laurel. We have operated a business in downtown Laurelfor 33 years. We have been fortunate to raise our kids here in Laurel and have always felt like Laurel is a relatively safe community to do SO. I am not against a much needed State Mental Hospital. I am against the location chosen for the new facility. There has been a lot of valid concerns brought up like; it will be too close to schools and residential housing, property values, no tax benefits to Laurel and the stigma it brings for future growth. Some of my concerns are with the current Mental Hospital in Warm Springs. The hospital has been under scrutiny for patient deaths and assaults. This has led to safety concerns for both the staff and community. They have struggled with staffing the facility which leads to insufficient patient care and safety concerns. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services took away thei r certification in 2023 due to the facility's failure to meet basic health and safety requirements. The loss of federal funding has put a strain on how the hospital is staffed and operated. There is 60-70 consistently on the waiting list for abed which puts a strain on the local detention facilities until room becomes available. The Mental Hospital in Warm Springs has been so insufficiently managed by the state that I am concerned about it beingthe same situation here in Laurel. I am concerned that our local law enforcement and fire department aren't equipped or staffed for this type of facility. I am concerned that staffing the facility maybe difficult. The Yellowstone County Jail advertises on the local radio to find qualified employees. It takes a lot of employees to run a mental hospital and even though we are the most populated county in Montana those Will be tough positions to fill and turnover is high. I think this could put more financial strain on the city of Laurel and Yellowstone county in the future. Concerned citizen. Don Smarsh Brittney Harakal �ym City Mayor p Monday, February 2, 2026 110 PM arioney Harakal .....y.: " FW: Concerns Regarding Proposed State Mental Hospital nave waggoner Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From:April Rosekelly<april_rosekelly@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday,January 21, 2026 9:01 AM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Proposed State Mental Hospital Dear City Council Members, I am writing as a Laurel resident to formally express my opposition to the proposed location of the new state mental health facility within city limits, particularly given its proximity to Laurel Elementary School and established residential neighborhoods. While I fully support the need for accessible mental health services in Montana, I strongly believe this specific site is not an appropriate or responsible placement. Locating a large state-run facility within walking distance of an elementary school raises serious safety, planning, and long-term community impact concerns that deserve deeper consideration. In addition, the proposed site removes approximately 115 acres from the local tax base due to its tax-exempt status. This directly impacts city services and school funding while placing additional strain on local infrastructure—without corresponding financial benefit to the community. The potential negative effects on nearby property values and key community assets, including the golf coarse that brings significant revenue into Laurel, should not be dismissed. Residents deserve transparency, meaningful public input, and thoughtful planning— especially for a project of this scale and permanence. I urge the Council to pause, 1 reconsider this location, and explore alternative sites outside of residential neighborhoods and school zones that would better serve both the facility's mission and the long-tern wellbeing of Laurel. Thank you for your time and for considering the voices of the community you represent. Sincerely, April Myers Laurel, Montana Sent from my Whone 2 Brittney Harakal ,. � .. Ll City Mayor Monday, February 2, 2026 1:13 PM 8rittney Harakal .,...,�. FW: Formal Request for Community Safety Review- Proposed Psychiatric Facility Location nave Waggovier Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From:Amber Zahn <blondie_locks09@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday,January 23, 20261:41 PM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Cc: Kyle Smith<kyle.smith@hepi.coni My E-mail<blondie_locks09@yahoo.com> Subject: Formal Request for Community Safety Review—Proposed Psychiatric Facility Location Dear City of Laurel Officials, I am writing as a parent and homeowner regarding the proposed forensic psychiatric facility adjacent to our residential neighborhood and within close proximity to an elementary school. Our community supports access to mental health treatment. However,the proposed location raises serious unresolved concerns related to public safety,emergency response preparedness, long-term oversight, and zoning suitability—particularly given the state's recent history of documented safety failures at Montana State Hospital. We are formally requesting: •An independent, publicly released community safety and risk assessment • Clear disclosure of security, staffing,and emergency response protocols •A public forum allowing residents,school representatives,and first responders to ask questions on the record • Consideration of alternative locations that do not place children and residential neighborhoods at heightened risk Proceeding without transparency and documented safety analysis would be deeply concerning. We respectfully request a written response. Sincerely, Amber Zahn Yahoo Mail ZomQh, Organize Conquer I Brittney Harakal City Mayor Monday, February 2, 20261:13 PM Brittney Harakal FW:Adjacent Property Impacts and Mitigation — laurel Forensic Facility nave Wao@oMr Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Amber Zahn <blondie_locks09@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday,January 23, 2026 10:59 PM To: charles.brereton@mt.gov Cc: citymuncil@laurel.mt.gov; commissioners@yellowstonecountymt.gov; City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; My E-mail<blondie_Iocks09@yahoo.com> 5ubject:Adjacent Property Impacts and Mitigation—laurel Forensic Facility Dear Sir or Madam, I am a property owner whose land directly shares a boundary with the proposed forensic psychiatric facility near Laurel, Montana. I am writing to formally request detailed information and written clarification regarding anticipated impacts to my property and potential mitigation measures. Because my property is immediately adjacent to the proposed site, I will be uniquely affected by decisions related to facility design, security features, access routes, lighting, and future expansion.These Impacts differ materially from those experienced by the broader community and raise legitimate concerns regarding property value, use, and long-term marketability. Specifically, I respectfully request written responses to the following: 1.Security and Design -The planned type, height,and visibility of perimeter fencing. -Whether any anti-climb, razor wire,or hardened security features are proposed. -The placement, intensity,and shielding of exterior lighting and surveillance systems. 2.Setbacks and Buffers -The planned setback distance from my shared property line -Whether the state is willing to implement permanent buffer measures, including berms, landscaping,tree lines,or no-build easements along the shared boundary. 3.Access and Operations -The location of access roads,staff entrances,and patient transport routes. - Expected traffic volume and any anticipated use of sirens or emergency transport protocols. - Hours of operation most likely to affect adjacent landowners. 4.Zoning and Future Expansion 1 -The zoning designation governing the site. -Whether current approvals allow for future expansion,additional beds,or enhanced security features without further public process. 5. Property Value Impacts and Mitigation -Whether the state has conducted or plans to conduct a property value impact or diminution study for adjacent landowners. -Whether mitigation measures or compensation are available for directly affected properties, including landscaping,easements, or other forms of relief. I appreciate the importance of expanding forensic mental health services In Montana.At the same time, I believe it is reasonable and necessary for the state to address the disproportionate impacts borne by adjacent property owners through transparency, mitigation,and good-faith engagement. I respectfully request that responses be provided in writing and Included in the official project record. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Amber Zahn Yahoo Mail: Search r anize Conquer 2 Brittney Harakal City Mayor Monday, Feb ruary 2, 2026116 PM Brittney Harakal ,,..,�. FW: A Mothers View nave waggower Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From:Ariel Ronan<ariellynnronan@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 28,2026 8:39 AM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject:A Mothers View Hi Mayor, Ariel Ronan here- Resident at 614 E 1st ST I know you likely won't reply, and that's ok. I would just like to send you a piece I wrote this morning. I hope that it might provide some insight into how it feels to be a motherto smalLchildren in the city of Lau rel at this present time. " Sitting in the drop off line at Laurel Elementary, waiting for my own 8 year old to exit my car. I'm watching other small children hop out of cars with backpacks half zipped and hair still messy, and I can't stop wondering: what's this view goingto be like if there's a forensic mental health facilityjust on the other side of those trees? This is where we wave goodbye to our smallest school goers.Where we tell them to be brave, to be kind, to have a good day. It'swhere we trustthatthis space is safe, familiar, and meantfor growing. And yet my eyes keep drifting past the playground, past the fence line, imagining something entirely different Loomingthere... something heavy, something that doesn't belong in the quiet rhythm of a school morning. I'm trying to be present in this moment, to soak in the normalcy of it all, but it's hard not to feel a knot in my chest. It's hard not to think about what it means to change the landscape around our kids. Notjust physically, but emotionally. This isn't about fear-mongering or ignoring the need for mental health care. But the reality is;this facility isn't about community mental health access. It's about criminals. Mentally unstable criminals. It's about the dissonance of placing something so complex, so serious, next to a place that's supposed to feel light and safe. 1 As my child exits the car and I pull away, I keep thinking: our kids deserve spaces that let them be kids. It's unsettling to wonder how much that view, and that feeling, might change Build the facility, Montana; on another piece of land, much further away from our school. " Thank you for your dedication to this town, 4 ` ARIEL RONAN 0 701-334.2779 ® arellynnronan®gmau.rom 2 Brittney Harakal From: Ward 1A Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 2:05 PM To: Brittney Harakal Cc: Civil Attorney Subject: FW: Forensic Mental Correctional Facility Sara B. Naylor t',xnri lkniki Ch%of L:nn:L AIMI ♦ !<Y5 i9M YlU9 ♦ N rv.I1X.idnvLurt�vn From: Monna Rae Adickes<monnarae@cbthebrokers.com> Sent: Saturday,January 31, 202610:57 PM To:Ward 3A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Forensic Mental Correctional Facility Dear Laurel City Council Members, What tangible benefit does this proposed mental health correctional facility bring to the City of Laurel? What do the Laurel property owners receive in exchange for the inevitable decline in real estate values? Has the State committed to rebuilding all of Laurel's city streets? Upgrading our water and sewer plants? Purchasing a new ambulance for our community? We do not want this facility in its proposed location. It is too close to our elementary school. We have been told this project means "jobs and growth:' Please—laugh out loud. Employees of this facility will not buy homes in Laurel. They will commute from neighboring communities. Meanwhile, our residents will shoulder the risk. Why the secrecy? According to Kurt's letter, Mayor Wagoneer was involved early in this plan. The City Attorney was later informed and warned Council members to remain silent. That should concern every resident. t This feels disturbingly familiar, just like how the NWE gas plant was ramrodded through with little regard for citizen concerns. We urge you to vote NO to the annexation of the approximately 114 acres owned by Miller Trois LLC I Norman Miller. Vote NO to the zoning change that would allow a forensic mental correctional facility to be built on the Miller property north of Old Highway 10. Laurel residents acknowledge that Eastern Montana needs a facility to care for the mentally ill. However, we strongly oppose placing it less than 500 yards from Laurel (West) Elementary School. Please move this project back to the state-owned land, north of town as originally selected. By doing so you will provide the City of Laurel with more growth opportunities and provide a level of safety to the heart of our residential neighborhoods and schools. For the sake of our children please Vote NO to annexation and the proposed zoning change. Respectfully, Monna Rae Adickes 102 8'h Ave # B Laurel MT 59044 MONNA RAE ADICKES Rea/ E+Iue Biuker Q 406-860-4284 ®MM man narae@cbthebrokem.com M 3135 Meadow View Drive ,,gg��,,Billings, MT 59102 POW71��, Qwww.mra406.com ®couaill BANKER THE BROKERS 2 Brittney He kal City Mayor Monday, February 2, 20261:18 PM Brittney Harakal FUJ: Letter of opposition to proposed state hospital nave waggower Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406) 628-8456 extension 5501 From:colleen Maurer<colmaurer@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 202611:54 AM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; michele@meridianlawmt.com; Kurt Markegard <kmarkegard@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; city.planner@laurel.mt.gov; Lee.Deming@legmt.gov; Vince.Rimi@legmt.gov;governor@mt.gov Subject: Letter of opposition to proposed state hospital Colleen Maurer 1416 W Maryland Lane Laurel, MT 59044 colmaurerralemail com 406-530-4166 January 30, 2026 Dear City of Laurel and State of Montana Representatives, I am writing as a concerned resident of Laurel to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed construction of a state mental hospital intended to house the worst violent offenders. While I understand the importance of providing mental health services and rehabilitation, the placement of such a facility in the proposed location for individuals with a history of severe violence presents significant risks and concerns for our city, its residents and our outlying county residents. Placing this facility on the proposed property will be the biggest detriment to the City of Laurel.The 114- acre parcel in question will not provide anytax benefit to our city and will kill the potential of any future commercial or residential development-these businesses and residences would generate tax income that would pay forwater, roads, emergency services, and schools.The State of Montana will not pay any taxes on this property, therefore leaving the city's current residences and business owners to foot the bill. If you are a current resident of Laurel,you already know that these services need tax dollars for ongoing improvement. t The primary responsibility of local and state government is to protect the safety and well-being of its citizens.The proximity of this facility to Laurel Elementary School is troubling. Establishing a facility for violent offenders—regardless of mental health status—poses a direct threat to public safety.The potential for escape, inadequate security measures, and unintended interactions with the community cannot be underestimated. Our residents, businesses, and schools could be put at risk should any security breaches occur. The presence of such a hospital is likely to have a detrimental effect on property values in the surrounding area, discourage new investment, and create a lasting stigma for our community. Families may feel less inclined to settle here, and current residents may consider relocating, undermining the fabric of our neighborhoods and the economic vitality of our city. I, along with many community members, feel that there has not been adequate transparency from state and local officials regarding the selection of the proposed site. Decisions of this magnitude must involve open dialogue with affected communities, thorough impact assessments, and consideration of alternative locations better suited for such specialized facilities. Our Mayor and CAO have been in discussion with the State long before lettingthe city council orthe city's residents know of their two- person plan. It's quite back-handed and has created serious mistrust in the two individuals involved. What gives two people the authority to go behind the backs of a whole community and force this through in such a hush-hush manner? I urge the city and state government to reconsider this proposal and instead explore locations that are more remote and specifically designed forthe secure treatment of high-risk individuals. Additionally, investment in community-based mental health services and preventive programs can yield positive outcomes without placing undue burden on our neighborhoods. In closing, I respectfully request that you take these concerns seriously and prioritize the safety, well- being, and future of Laurel. Looking at the overall picture. Thankyou foryour attention to this matter. Sincerely, Colleen Maurer 2 Brittney Harakal � City Mayor r Monday, February 2, 2026 112 PM BW:rittney February �.: ' F Forensic Mental Healthcare Project nave waggoMr Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Laura Nelson <lauranelson4444@gmaiLcom> Sent:Thursday,January 22, 20261:33 PM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Forensic Mental Healthcare Project Good afternoon, Mayor, Allow me to introduce myself to you. My name is Laura Nelson and I have been in the healthcare development industry for more than 30 years. I am a Montana native born and raised. My specialty has been in rural America. I'm writing to you to give you some positive feedback that I hope you will consider. My corporation PPI has been acquiring funding for building new and renovating old healthcare facilities and working with States, Senators and Congressmen from all over the US. I do live in Billings. However, I come to you as my Son and his Wife live in Laurel along with many friends. When building a hospital, clinic, nursing home, jail, whatever project you have and the State is involved, please maximize your potential by building out in a large area, a vacant field, between Billings and Laurel off of the highway and having the State pay for infrastructure, etc... Always build with the future in mind. This way you can grow, expand or add on services that may be needed in the future for these patients, etc... The land in my projects has always been donated. I have worked with major donors all over the US as well. Once the land is agreed upon, then you will invite blueprints, architectural drawings. You may or may not welcome this information. However, building in any neighborhoods or next to schools does not allow you to expand, grow to maximize your future funding potential. For example, the Red Lodge Hospital was first built up against a mountain with neighbors all around. There was nowhere to make improvements, so you probably noticed that they and the Columbus Hospital are now built on the outside of these towns. So vital. I am currently caring for an elderly parent but am available for questions if you would like to visit. I have assisted the Columbus Hospital, Big Timber, and the like, but am currently slowing down to assist with family affairs. 1 I wish you nothing but the best and do thank you for stepping up to tackle this project. It is needed for Yellowstone Country's ability overall to stay in front of the population's increase in crime. I hope this information is helpful. Sincerely, Laura Nelson Laura Nelson P.O. Box 1854 Billings, MT 59103 (406)670-0339 Mobile (Leave a message or feel free to tent) 2 Brittney Harakal City Mayor Monday, February 2, 2026 1:16 PM Bdttney Harakal .,,..,�. FW: Proposed laurel Forensic Mental Hospital pave Waggower Mayor Cityof Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Kristi Hansen <kristi606@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday,January 28, 2026 11:25 AM To:governor@mt.gov Cc:vince.ricci@legmt.gov; lee.deming@legmt.gov; City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1A <wardla@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1B<wardlb@laureLrnLgov>;Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2B <ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<ward31b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4A <ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4B<ward41b@laureLmt.gov>; Laurel City Planner<cityplanner@laureLmt.gov> Subject: Proposed Laurel Forensic Mental Hospital Greetings from Laurel, I am writing to respectfully urge you to reconsider the proposed location of the Forensic Mental Hospital in Laurel and to relocate it to a more appropriate site. Laurel is a small, close-knit community that takes great pride in being a safe, family-oriented town with strong local values, growing businesses, and a positive future ahead. The placement of a forensic mental health facility in our community raises serious concerns regarding public safety, long-term economic impact, property values, and the overall well-being of residents. These concerns extend to the surrounding subdivisions, nearby neighborhoods, and the elementary school—all of which would become immediate neighbors to the proposed facility. How can this possibly be considered an acceptable option? I ask you to reflect on whether you would be comfortable with this in your own backyard or near your children, and if not, to consider why that answer matters for the families of Laurel. Laurel has worked hard to build momentum for growth and development, and this decision has the potential to halt that progress, deter new investment, and undermine years of effort by local families, business owners, and community leaders. We fully recognize the importance of mental health services and the critical role they play in our state. However, we strongly believe that this type of facility should be placed in a location that is better suited from both an infrastructure and community-impact perspective—one that ensures patient care, staff safety, and public confidence without placing an undue burden on a small town like ours. Laurel residents deserve a voice in decisions that will permanently shape the future of our community. We are not asking that these services be eliminated—only that they be thoughtfully and strategically located in a place that better aligns with public safety, community development, and long-term planning goals for Montana. I respectfully ask that you reconsider this decision and explore alternative locations that will serve both the needs of the state and the well-being of local communities. Respectfully, Kristi Hansen Laurel, Montana z Brittney Harakal From: Civil Attorney Sent: Wednesday,January 28, 2026 2:08 AM To: Brittney Harakal Subject: FW:Community Impact and Professional Concern Regarding Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Please include in the public record to be read at the next meeting. Thanks! Best Regards, A4& C. �-- Michele L. Braukmann Civil City Attorney City of Laurel Cell Phone: 406.671.4333 civ lattornev(a la urel.mt.eov CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This transmission may contain information which is privileged,confidential, and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges. If you are not the addressee,or you are not authorized to disclose the contents herein, please note that any disclosure,copying, distribution,or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,please destroy it and notify me immediately. From:Civil Attorney Sent:Wednesday,January 28, 2026 2:07 AM To: 'Katlyn Gotschall'<katlyngotschall@gmail.com>; City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Kurt Markegard <kmarkegard @lauml.mt.gov> Cc:Ward 1A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@lauml.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 2B <ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4B <ward4b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: RE: Community Impact and Professional Concern Regarding Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Dear Ms. Gotschall: I want to first state, as an attorney,that deals with many issues that are both legal and otherwise in nature, including many that involve mental health issues, I thank you for your perspective and consideration on this issue. As the City Attorney for the City of Laurel, I don't ordinarily individually respond to these matters, because it's just not productive, nor is it often legal. So, I don't want you to take my lack of response on this to be a lack of understanding about the importance of what you are conveying. I also hope that you don't find any lack of CC response to be the same. I have advised CC that they simply cannot respond on these matters, right now, based upon the legal stage of things, and they simply need to hear your comment and process it,as they determine appropriate, and at the necessary time that a formal annexation/zoning matter is in front of them. But, your words struck me deeply tonight, and I want you to know that. It was a long and hard meeting tonight,and it was hard for both constituents,our public, and our City Staff. But, it was incredibly important, because this is exactly how City governance is intended to work. 1 Thank you for your public feedback, and it will be read into the record the next meeting. Please know that you can appear at any upcoming meetings and speak in person. I personally appreciate you. I appreciate your Clinical Work. I appreciate the work that your Husband provides to our Volunteer Fire Department. I hope that you know that you are seen,we hear you, and I have full faith and confidence that our City Council,who are wise and informed individuals, will evaluate all matters that are presented to them in an informed manner with the full record that is presented to them. Best Regards, Lfaf.4 L — Michele L. Braukmann Civil City Attorney City of Laurel Cell Phone: 406.671.4333 civilattornev@laurel mt.gov CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This transmission may contain information which is privileged, confidential,and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges. If you are not the addressee,or you are not authorized to disclose the contents herein, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution,or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,please destroy it and notify me immediately. From: Katlyn Gotschall<kadvngotschail agmall corn> Sent: Tuesday,January 27, 2026 9:50 PM To:City Mayor<citvmavorPlaureLm Leov>; Kurt Markegard <kma rkega rd.�r rnl 7s.a:>; Civil Attorney <civi!a ttor_levau !aurel.mt.=ov> Cc:Ward 1A<ward larJlaureLnst.eov>;Ward Is<wa rd lbld laurel.mca::a>; Ward 2A <_ __ _ _ ..ecv>;Ward 2B <ward2bCdlaurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<mard3a .,D aarel.m[go v>; Ward 4A<wm rd4a(ti F. >; Ward 4B <ward41bCd1aureI.mtaoy>; Ward 3B<wa,d3b PIaurel.mtgov> Subject:Community Impact and Professional Concern Regarding Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Dear Mayor and Members of the Laurel City Council, My name is Katlyn GotschalL, and I am a resident of Laurel, Montana. I am writing this letter following the City Council meeting held this evening(1-27-2026)to formally share my concerns, perspective, and professional opinion regarding the proposed annexation of aforensic mental health facility into the City of Laurel. When I met my husband, I knew Laurelwould become our forever home.We have built our Life here with intention and commitment, purchasing our home, raising our child, establishing our careers, and investing deeply in this community and its people. I am a Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor. While this facility is sometimes framed as an opportunity for mental health employment,the reaLity is that forensic state facilities primarily employ psychiatrists, psychologists, correctional staff, and nursing professionals. Roles for counselors are limited and highly custodial in nature, and they are rarely filled by Local outpatient clinicians.This facility would not meaningfully strengthen Laurel's mental health workforce, increase access to care, or support community based therapy services. My clinicalwork centers around trauma, safety, and trust. What I have observed through this process is 2 that the City has unintentionally activated a collective trauma response within the community. Fight, flight,freeze, and fawn are predictable reactions when people feel unsafe or excluded from decision making. Laurel is responding with fight. When questions are asked with urgency and emotion, it is not hostility. It is fear. Fear emerges when trust has been disrupted. Many residents feel blinds ided and unheard. Rather than prioritizing sustainable growth such as affordable housing for healthcare professionals, investment in localservices, and workforce retention,the City is considering annexing a state run forensic facility that offers little direct benefit to Laurel while introducing Longterm risk. Once annexed, the City of Laurel would assume ongoing responsibility for municipal services tied to this facility.This includes emergency response, fire protection, medical coordination, infrastructure support, and mutual aid response. These responsibilities carry staffing, training, liability, and financial implications that remain even if state priorities or funding structu res change. Community members are not passive observers or social media acquaintances.We are residents who have entrusted our elected officials with transparency, accountability, and honest communication. When information is shared unevenly or appears selectively endorsed through informal platforms, it further erodes trust and deepens community concern. As the spouse of a volunteer firefighter, my concerns deepen further. My home is structured around other people's worst days. I fear that our already stretched first responders may be expected to manage incidents involving a forensic population without specialized, ongoing, and fully funded training. Forensic psychiatric response differs significantly from standard crisis intervention.Without guaranteed preparation and resources, Local responders are placed at risk alongside the communitythey serve. I also feel anxiety knowing my husband may be asked to give more time, energy, and emotional labor to support a decision that does not clearly support him or his fellow responders in return. I feel shock that those entrusted with safeguard!ng this community would consider introducing a high acuity facility without a clearly defined and publicly presented plan for emergency readiness, responder protection, and Longterm sustainability. Montana alreadyfaces critical shortages in healthcare and emergency personnel. Adding a high demand facility without parallel investment in workforce retention increases burnout risk,turnover, and strain on systems that are already operating at capacity. As a mother, I am left asking howwe teach our children to trust leadership when transparency feels absent.The individuals housed in a forensic mental health prison are not there voluntarily, nor are they stabilized for community integration.As a parent, I cannot support a decision that compromises my child's sense of safety. For clarity: A forensic mental health hospital is a secure psychiatric facilitythat evaluates and treats individuals involved in the criminal justice system, often those deemed incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.These facilities operate with correctional Level security and house individuals who have committed serious offenses. 3 Trust is built through consistency, transparency, and mutual respect. Safety is the reasonable assurance that individuals and communities are protected from harm and that adequate systems are in place to respond effectively when risk arises. Communication is the clear,timely, and honest exchange of information that allows informed decision making. To date, there has been no publicly presented community benefit agreement outlining guaranteed funding, staffing ratios, emergency response support, infrastructure investment, or longterm oversight mechanisms that would directly benefit Laurel residents. You have already heard concerns regarding the lack of economic benefit, tax revenue, or expanded services this facility would bring. Other communities have expressed willingness to accept this facility where infrastructure and resources may better support it.This proposal is not comparable to the Billings Clinic Psychiatric Center, which stabilizes individuals in crisis. It is not Warm Springs. It is not Passages. This is a prison for mentally ill offenders. Opposition to this annexation is not opposition to mental health treatment. It is opposition to placing a secure forensic facility in a community without demonstrated benefit, adequate preparation, or transparent collaboration. Tonight,you have heard from manyvoices.This Letter adds the perspective of a mental health professional, a first responder's spouse, a mother, and a committed community member. I respectfully urge you not to annex this facility into Laurel. Sincerely, Katlyn Gotschall, MS, LCPC Resident of Laurel, Montana 406-697-9487 4 Brittney Harakal ®` 1 City Mayor Monday, February 2, 2026 115 PM Brittn7 February FW:Community Impact and Professional Concern Regarding Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility nave Waggoner Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Katlyn Gotschall<katlyngotschall@gmail.mm> Sent:Tuesday,January 27, 2026 9:50 PM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Kurt Markegard <kmarkegard@laurel.mt.gov>; Civil Attorney <civilattorney@ la u m I.mt.gov> Cc:Ward 1A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2B <ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 4B <ward4b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3B<ward3b@laurel.mt.gov> Subject:Community Impact and Professional Concern Regarding Proposed Forensic Mental Health Facility Dear Mayor and Members of the Laurel City Council., My name is Katlyn Gotschall, and I am a resident of Laurel, Montana. I am writing this LetterfoRowing the City Council meeting held this evening(1-27-2026)to formally share my concerns, perspective, and professional opinion regarding the proposed annexation of a forensic mental health facility into the City of Laurel.. When I met my husband, I knew Laurel would become our forever home. We have built our life here with intention and commitment, purchasing our home, raising our child, establishing our careers, and investing deeply in this community and its people. I am a Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor.While this facility is sometimes framed as an opportunity for mental health employment,the reality is that forensic state facilities primarily employ psychiatrists, psychologists, correctional staff, and nursing professionals. Roles for counselors are limited and highly custodial in nature, and they are rarely filled by local outpatient clinicians. This faciLity would not meaningfully strengthen Laurel's mental health workforce, increase access to care, or support community based therapy services. My cLinical work centers around trauma, safety, and trust. What I have observed through this process is that the City has unintentionally activated a collective trauma response within the community. Fight, flight, freeze, and fawn are predictable reactions when people feel unsafe or excluded from decision making. Laurel is responding with fight. 1 When questions are asked with urgency and emotion, it is not hostility. It is fear. Fear emerges when trust has been disrupted. Many residents feel blindsided and unheard. Rather than prioritizingsustainable growth such as affordable housing for healthcare professionals, investment in IocaLservices, and workforce retention,the City is considering annexing a state run forensic facility that offers little direct benefit to Laurel while introducing Longterm risk. Once annexed, the City of Laurel would assume ongoing responsibility for municipal services tied to this facility.This includes emergency response, fire protection, medical coordination, infrastructure support, and mutual aid response. These responsibilities carry staffing,training, liability, and financial implications that remain even if state priorities or funding structures change. Community members are not passive observers or social media acquaintances.We are residents who have entrusted our elected officials with transparency, accountability, and honest communication. When information is shared unevenly or appears selectively endorsed through informal platforms, it further erodes trust and deepens community concern. As the spouse of a volunteer firefighter, my concerns deepen further. My home is structured around other people's worst days. I fear that our already stretched first responders may be expected to manage incidents involving forensic population without specialized, ongoing, and fully funded training. Forensic psychiatric response differs significantly from standard crisis intervention. Without guaranteed preparation and resources, Local responders are placed at risk alongside the community they serve. I also feel anxiety knowing my husband may be asked to give more time, energy, and emotional Labor to support a decision that does not clearly support him or his fellow responders in return. I feel shockthat those entrusted with safeguarding this community would consider introducing a high acuityfacility without a clearly defined and publicly presented plan for emergency readiness, responder protection, and Longterm sustainabiLity. Montana already faces critical shortages in healthcare and emergency personnel. Adding high demand facility without parallel investment in workforce retention increases burnout risk,turnover, and strain on systems that are already operating at capacity. As a mother, I am left asking how we teach our children to trust leadership when transparency feels absent. The individuals housed in a forensic mental health prison are not there voluntarily, nor are they stabilized for community integration. As a parent, I cannot support a decision that compromises my child's sense of safety. For clarity: A forensic mental health hospital is a secure psychiatric facility that evaluates and treats individuals involved in the criminal justice system, often those deemed incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.These facilities operate with correctional Level security and house individuals who have committed serious offenses. Trust is built through consistency,transparency, and mutual respect. Safety is the reasonable assurance that individuals and communities are protected from harm and that adequate systems are in place to respond effectively when risk arises. Communication is the clear,timely, and honest exchange of information that allows informed decision making. To date, there has been no publicly presented community benefit agreement outlining guaranteed funding, staffing ratios, emergency response support, infrastructure investment, or longterm oversight mechanisms that would directly benefit Laurel residents. You have already heard concerns regardingthe lack of economic benefit, tax revenue, or expanded services this facility would bring. Other communities have expressed willingness to accept this facility where infrastructure and resources may better support it. This proposal is not comparable to the Billings Clinic Psychiatric Center, which stabilizes individuals in crisis. It is not Warm Springs. It is not Passages. This is a prison for mentally ill offenders. Opposition to this annexation is not opposition to mental health treatment. It is opposition to placing a secure forensic facility in a community without demonstrated benefit, adequate preparation, or transparent collaboration. Tonight, you have heard from many voices. This letter adds the perspective of a mental health professional, a first responder's spouse, a mother, and a committed community member. I respectfully urge you notto annex this facility into Laurel. Sincerely, Katlyn Gotschall, MS, LCPC Resident of Laurel, Montana 406-697-9487 3 Brittney Harakal City Mayor f Monday, February 2, 2026 1:18 PM Brittney Harakal i� FW: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Attachments: Matt Kuntz Letter to Laurel City Council 30JAN26.pdf nave Waggower Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Matt Kuntz<matt@namimt.org> Sent: Friday,January 30, 202612:37 PM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1A<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 38 <ward3b@laureLmt.gov>;Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Dear Laurel City Council, Please accept the attached letter of appreciation from NAMI Montana foryour support for the new forensic mental health facility. Hopefully, it provides some helpful information about the genesis of this effort at the Legislature and how some of the challenges of Yellowstone County were tied to it from the beginning. NAMI Montana has also been involved with the creation of the Galen facility in 2015. Hopefully some of the things that we've learned over the Last ten years with that facility will be helpful as well. Thankyou, Matt Matt Kuntz JD, MHA Executive Director NAMI Montana NAMI Montana has a resource guide on ourwebsite for every county in Montana. Passe let us know if anything needs to be updated foryour county. httcs•/InamimtorgLmontana-county-mental-heatth- rescurce-guides/ t Brittney Harakal From: Ward 4A Sent: Friday,January 30, 2026 3:40 PM To: Brihney Harakal Subject: FW: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Attachments: Matt Kuntz Letter to Laurel City Council 30JAN26.pdf From: Matt Kuntz<matt@namimt.org> Sent: Friday,January 30, 202612:37 PM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 1A<wardla@laureLmt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@laureLmt.gov>; Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3B <ward3b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Dear Laurel City Council, Please accept the attached letter of appreciation from NAMI Montana for your support for the new forensic mental health facility. Hopefully, it provides some helpful information abcutthe genesis of this effort at the Legislature and how some of the challenges of Yellowstone County were tied to it from the beginning. NAMI Montana has also been involved with the creation of the Galen facility in 2015. Hopefully some of the things that we've learned over the last ten years with that facility will be helpful as well. Thankyou, Matt Matt Kuntz JD, MHA Executive Director NAMI Montana NAMI Montana has a resource guide on our website for every county in Montana. Please let us know if anything needs to be updated for your county. https7llna[oimt.org/montana-county-moolat-heatth- t Brittney Harakal From: Ward 1B Sent: Friday,January 30, 2026 12:44 PM To: Civil Attorney Cc: Kurt Markegard; Brittney Harakal Subject: Fw: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Attachments: Matt Kuntz Letter to Laurel City Council 30JAN26.Pdf From: Matt Kuntz<matt@namimt.org> Sent: Friday,January 30,202612:36 PM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward IA<wardla@laurel.mt.gov>;Ward 1B<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 2A<ward2a@IaureI.mt.gov>; Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3A<ward3a@laurel.mt.gov>; Ward 3B <ward3b@IaureLmt.gov>;Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Letter of Gratitude from NAMI Montana Dear Laurel City Council, Please accept the attached Letter of appreciation from NAMI Montana foryour support forthe new forensic mental health facility. Hopefully, it provides some helpful information about the genesis of this effort at the Legislature and how some of the challenges of Yellowstone County were tied to it from the beginning. NAMI Montana has also been involved with the creation of the Galen facility in 2015. Hopefully some of the things that we've learned over the last ten years with that facility will be helpful as well. Thankyou, Matt Matt Kuntz JD, MHA Executive Director NAMI Montana NAMI Montana has a resource guide on ourwebsite for every county in Montana. Please Let us know if anything needs to be updated for your county. httns//namimt org/montana-cocnN-mental-health- resource-guldes/ t nflini Montana National Alliance on Mental Illness Laurel City Council 115 West 1 at Street Laurel, MT 59044 January 30, 2026 Subject: New Forensic Menta l Health Facility Dear Laurel City Council, NAMI Montana works to improve the lives of Montanans with mental health conditions and theirfamilies through support, education, and advocacy. On behalf of NAMI Montana, I want to thank you far your support in building a forensic facility in your community. As part of our work for Montana families, NAMI Montana tries to improve the interface between mental health conditions and the criminal justice system. It is hard, slow work with progress measured over the course of years. In 2015,we supported building the forensic facility in Galen. This was in response to the state locking offenders with severe mental health conditions in solitary confinement in Montana State Prison because they couldn't manage their medication needs and the behaviors related to their untreated mental health conditions. It was horrible for everyone Involved.There was also a massive lawsuit with the ACLU and Disability Rights Montana. The forensic facility at Galen that came out of that nightmare has been a success for the State of Montana, people served by Galen, and the community that supports it. NAMI Montana and our allies in the Legislature worked to improve the laws around mental health and the criminal justice system in the last decade. I think we have made some slow progress in that, but Montana's population of people needing forensic mental health services continues to grow.Ten years ago,the issue of a dangerous lack of forensic capacity showed up in the Montana State Prison. This time the issue is starkest in county jails across Montana. The reality of the dangerous lack of forensic capacity in Montana came to a head for us and members of the Montana Legislature during the hearing on Representative lames Reavis's bill to make it possible for mental health evaluations to be offered in jails and prisons.This bill was well thought out, but desperate move to try to do something to address the massive backlog of people in jail in need of psychological evaluations. The testimony from NAMI Montana P.O. Box 1021 Helena, MT 59624 jail staff, law enforcement, and county attorneys was incredibly powerful. The message was that Montana's countyjails were overwhelmed with people with complex mental health needs who are waiting for some kind of forensic services. The testimony was excruciating. Jail staff desperateLytrying to serve prisoners that were well outside their facility's ability to safely serve. County Attorney searchingfor answers to move cases forward that were bogged down with either evaluations or treatment requirements to ensure they met their burden for"Fitness to Proceed." Everyone knowing that it is just a matter of time before the state and the counties are hit with a massive Lawsuit. No testimony was more powerful than those given by people in the Legal system in Yellowstone County. Based upon the magnitude of the issue in Yellowstone County alone, it was clear that the State of Montana needed a new forensic facility. It was also clear that it needed to be able to easily serve Yellowstone County and the counties in Eastern Montana. While there were a fewturns ortwo in the hallways of the Capital,thatwas the genesis of the bill that passed the Legislature. NAMI Montana is grateful to the City of Laurel for hosting this facility that is critical to Montana and specifically Yellowstone County. While I understand that there are always concerns about the placement of public health and justice facilities, NAMI Montana expects that this facility will operate similarly to the successful forensic unit at Galen.The 32-bed patient population will be a relatively small facility, in a well-designed building,with good staffing ratios. Most of the patient stays will be a jsrelatively short duration -for either psychological evaluations or restoration of competency. Patients in need of long-term stays will eventually be transitioned to the group homes on the Montana State Hospital campus in Warm Springs. As described bythe Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, most of the jobs in this facility will be for nursing staff and psychiatric assistants. These positions will offer great opportunities forthe citizens of Laurel and also help bring in additional healthcare practitioners to Laurelwho begin byworking at the facility and then later transition to healthcare roles in the community. NAMI Montana P.O. Box 1021 Helena, MT 59624 Thank you for supporting this facility that is so essential for Montana families that have been impacted by mental health conditions and the criminal justice system. We really appreciate any help you can provide in moving it forward. Sincerely, Matthew Kuntz JD, MHA Executive Director NAMI Montana mattCmnamimt.or¢ (406)443-7871 NAMI Montana P.O. Box 1021 Helena, MT 59624 1/29/2026 RE: Formal Opposition to Annexation and Development of the Forensic Mental Health Facility To the Members of the Laurel City Council, I am writing to you today not just as a neighbor to the proposed site, but as a taxpayer who is deeply concerned by the lack of transparency and the disregard for public safety inherent in the State's plan to build a 32-bed Forensic Mental Health Facility in our backyard. I urge this Council to formally oppose the placement of this facility and to commit to denying any future petition for annexation of the land in question. Opposition is based on three undeniable facts:. 1. The Violation of the "Safe Zone" for our Children The proposed site is 451 yards from West Elementary School. This is not a standard medical clinic; it is a forensic facility housing individuals involved in the criminal justice system. The Laurel School District has already issued a public statement opposing this location. I ask you: if the school district responsible for our children's safety says this is a bad idea, why would the City Council even consider facilitating it? 2. Administrative Overreach and Lack of Transparency It is alamring that while the Council was reportedly kept in the dark,the City Planning Director and Mayor were actively courting this project. In a November letter, the Planning Director admitted the City had no suitable land,yet he personally steered the State toward this specific plot because the infrastructure was "remarkably successful" for their needs. This project was fast-tracked behind closed doors, bypassing the public's right to be heard before a buy-sell agreement was ever signed. 3. The Council Holds the Power of Annexation the State of Montana cannot operate this facility without the City of Laurel's water and sewer. Per MCA 7-2-44 and Resolution R08-22, the City Council has the ultimate authority to grant or deny annexation. The State may own the land, but they do not own our community's future. You are the final line of defense for the residents of Laurel. Annexing this land would be a choice to prioritize state infrastructure convenience over the expressed safety concerns of the Laurel Schools and the residents you represent. I respectfully request that the Council adds a formal discussion of this facility to the next agenda d goes on the record in support of our schools and neighborhoods by opposing this location. incerel nJu to on 201 Wes 4P Street 06-671-2 20 Brittney Harakal Cl Mayor !� Monday, February 2, 2026 118 PM Britt Harakal FW: Urgent Safety Concerns Regarding Proposed Mental Health Facility Near West Elementary nave waggower Mayor City of Laurel., Montana (406) 628-8456 extension 5501 From:Jeanette Miner<minerfamilynovl0@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 9:25 PM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Urgent Safety Concerns Regarding Proposed Mental Health Facility Near West Elementary Dear Mayor and Members of the Laurel City Council, My name is Jeanette Miner, and I am a resident of Laurel, Montana and a parent of three children currently enrolled in the Laurel School District, including one child attending West Elementary. I am writingto formally and strongly express my opposition to the proposed mental health hospital being built near West Elementary and surrounding residential neighborhoods.The placement of a secured mental health facility near a school where young children attend daily is a serious safety concern. Schools should be areas of protection, stability, and peace not locations where families are left worrying about potential risks or emergency situations outside their children's classrooms.This decision directly affects the safety of students, school staff, and the entire Laurel.community. Parents should not have to question whether their children are safe at school due to the location of a nearby institutional facility.We already ask our children to Live with lockdown drills and constant safety awareness.Adding this facility only increases fear, anxiety, and risk.Those who approve this project must understand the responsibility that comes with such a decision. If incidents occurthat impact our schools, neighborhoods, or community, the accountabiLity lies with those who chose to move forward despite clear public concern. Families should not be placed in a position where they feel forced to selLtheir homes in order to protect their children. We should not have to leave the communitywe love because of a decision that prioritizes facility placement over resident safety.This hospital, in this Location, WILL not bring peace or security to our neighborhoods. Instead, it will create Long term concern, increased emergency response activity, and lasting worryfor parents and residents. While mental health services are important, their placement must be appropriate and must not compromise school.safety or community well being. I respectfully and earnestly pray that you reconsiderthis decision. Please protect the residents of Laurel. Please protect our children. Our schools should remain places of learning, not areas of fear or uncertainty. 1 I strongly urge the City Cou ncil to pause and reevaluate the location of this facility and to place the safety of our children and families first!!! Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Jeanette Miner Laurel, Montana 2 3:53 \ " ' +1 (406) 403-2725 ) 40 Gre-St Fa!ls, M Uh, this message is for Brent. Um, city council award number 2 councilman. Um, College concerning the state forensics hospital, et cetera, mental hospital that is coming to coming to Laurel, possibly coming to Laurel. I guess my only comment is, is if it does get to a scenario where the city council has an opportunity to vote upon whether or not, For example, a key thing is the annex, you know, the property into the into the city itself. Um, would really, as a councilman, um, I' m just kind of a reminder, I assume that you probably, you know, are in touch with all of your constituents, the people that voted you in, um, that you recontact them and get a good cross section of what they, what they believe, just kind of like when you're out campaigning, asking for their, asking for their support. Uh, now it's asking for their true honest opinion, and, you know, -'' ,, ,i_ contacts Keypad 3:54A rE 39 1of1 .1 ^ +1 (406) 403-2725 c ' cS !MI councilma, i. U1 1 wncerning the state forensics hospital, et cetera, mental hospital that is coming to coming to Laurel, possibly coming to Laurel. I guess my only comment is, is if it does get to a scenario where the city council has an opportunity to vote upon whether or not, For example, a key thing is the annex, you know, the property into the into the city itself. Um, would really, as a councilman, um, I ' m just kind of a reminder, I assume that you probably, you know, are in touch with all of your constituents, the people that voted you in, um, that you recontact them and get a good cross section of what they, what they believe, just kind of like when you 're out campaigning, asking for their, asking for their support. Uh, now it's asking for their true honest opinion, and, you know, voting, voting that direction. Thank you very much and have a great day. Bye. ,. Contacts Keypad Brittney Harakal From: Laurel MT <laurel-mt@munimdeweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 9:26 AM To: Brittney Harakal Subject: Matt & Elizabeth US Submitted on Tuesday, February 3, 2026- 9:26am Submitted by anonymous user: 65.124.101.42 Submitted values are: Name Matt&Elizabeth Gig Address 1200 Cedar Crest Circle Public Comment The state's decision to place a 32-bed forensic mental health facility 459 yards from West Elementary raises serious concerns that this council needs to address. Safety.West Elementary experienced a student safety incident this year driven in part by funding and resource gaps.The school has taken this seriously and is working to improve—but those improvements require resources Laurel simply doesn't have.The Laurel School Board opposes this facility. Adding a forensic facility housing justice-involved individuals within 459 yards compounds risk at a school actively working to close safety gaps. Extraction without compensation.This facilityfollows a pattern this community knows well. Northwestern Energy built a methane plant here without proper zoning approval—asking forgiveness rather than permission--while providing$1.9M in tax revenue that does Little to offset the impacts on our infrastructure and services. CHS Refinery has repeatedly protested their taxes, costing Laurel Public Schools as much as$13 million over fouryears while schools borrowed against escrowed funds just to operate. Now the state places a forensic facility just outside city limits—zero tax revenue to Laurel, sit of the risk. Transparency. Miller Trois LLC, connected to Billings attorney Malcolm Goodrich, has held the selected 114-acre property since 2008. Laurel officials said no suitable city land existed,yet the state selected this specific parcel outside city limits. Local officials learned of the plans from media, not the state. Our newly appointed CAD Kurt Markegard was Planning Director during the Northwestern zoning controversy—the same pattern of opacity is repeating. If Mr. Markegard has nothing to hide,voluntary release of his past 7years of tax documentation and business interests would go a long waytoward rebuilding public trust. Liability.The state is aware of our school's safety challenges, aware of the facility's proximity, and aware of community opposition. Should any incident occur,this documented awareness establishes foreseeable risk. This council has a responsibility to Laurel's residents and our children. I urge you to formally oppose this facility location and demand full transparency from the state regarding the property selection process. Email gilgml2@gmail.com The results of this submission may be viewed at: https:L/r,iIUQfta!jrelmontene.com/nQdeLl6092/submission/ 2�5 t Brittney Harakal From: Ward 1B Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 12:13 PM To: Bnttney Harakal Cc: Civil Attorney; Kurt Markegard Subject: Fw: Vote NO on Annexation - Forensic Mental Health Facility From: Matt<gilgm12@gmail.c0m> Sent:Tuesday, February 3, 202611:16 AM To: Ward SB<wardlb@laurel.mt.gov> Subject:Vote NO on Annexation- Forensic Mental Health Facility Dear Tom Canape, I am a resident of Laurel at 1200 Cedar Crest Circle, and I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed annexation for the forensic mental health facility. This 32-bed facility wou ld house justice-system involved individuals just 459 yards from West Elementary School.. Our community deserves transparency about how this location was selected and what security measures will protect our children and neighborhoods. Key concerns: - No tax revenue to Laurel despite increased burden on emergency services - Proximityto schools and residential areas - Lack of public input in the decision-making process - Inadequate information about security and safety protocols The state cannot proceed without City Council approval of annexation. I urge you to vote NO and demand full transparency from city leadership about this process. Sincerely, Matt Gig 1200 Cedar Crest Circle Matt Gilg mattaila.dev Cell: 86e.771.3511 I t Brittney Harakal II'I City Mayor Monday, February 2, 2026 1:12 PM Brinney Harakal ......�� ': FW: Psychiatric prison nave waggowev Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Amber Zahn<blond1e_1ocks09@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, January 21, 202611:37 PM To: City Mayor<citymayor@Iaurel.mt.gov> Subject: Re: Psychiatric prison Hello sir, I write to you with a heavy heart but as a supporter of you. I live quite literally next door to the site in Laurel, Mt of the psychiatric prison. I have to tellyou, there has been literallyzero transparency about this. So many people have been blind sided bythis facility and what it really is.And now it's being built quite literally in my backyard where I raise my babies.This is absolutely terrifying. It's completely taking away any sense of securitywe have worked so hard to build. Nowthere is a plan to house criminally insane people where I raise my kids. Sir, it is literally in my backyard. It's less than five blocks away from where they go to school. Everything we have worked so hard to secure for them is being ripped away. Please sir, see itfrom my prospective, a terrified motherwho has done everythingto ensure the safety of my children, who has done everything to raise them in a safe home, this is not ok. Please do not let them build this facility here. Yahoo Mail' Search. Organize.Conquer On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 1:42 PM, Amber Zahn <blondie_locks0gayahoo com> wrote: The property circled in blue is where we live. What would you do if it were you? Howwould you feel?We have two small children here.Their school is approximately four blocks away.This is absolutely terrifying. t 1 :35 © c' 00 • u � - j i3 t Yahoo MaKP Search Qwanize,Concuer On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 1:31 PM, Amber Zahn <blondie_Iocks09 a)yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Mayor, My name is Amber Zahn. This is the view from my Living room. The living room in the house where I raise my kids. Approximately four blocks east of here is their elementary school.Their dad was raised here. His mother was raised here. But the view that I show you in these pictures is a farmers field.The same farmers field in process of a buy/sell agreement fora psychiatric prison. I do not oppose the prison, what I oppose is the location. Developing prison here will drive down our propertyvalues. Our neighbor's property values. Even with all of the security, it puts our family at risk. It puts the kids in the school at risk. It puts Laurel at risk. We don't even have the infrastructure to sustain such a facility. We don't have the emergency services.This was a poorly thought out plan only reaching for gain at the cost of the residents.We cannot afford to lose the value we have in our home, both monetary and memory. 3 y 'Sr rb r.. . tiF,Y. I rl / i 1'wll�C 'IL FF dd y�I 1 ` �� ,. �i„' �� / .� . \_�� .- -=: � 5 �.: {��,.�� j ,�,:, . ,� � , i� �� . �,.t r` '� � i � ,, '%�r t i fi ' a eR}( urr � MiN WV if \�•`i i..�.l sy\IICPQ I' �� 1 i ' .4t5ai''.�l�. "�6. ti y ' 6 bZ �MAR a \t t . .9 Ctbj, SSA M.! '► �" a,' YtYrl/ �rV .r Y` cQ��i��1 , �i1 � `�`��v 1��o� "i�3Yr `t•�Alr v ��`" • ��r � , iu� r`�t►O1p �.p. �Ya /�"'�l�tl ��t�� 'Wr ��"� �4s.� �p��'.,•c. `. 'r \� <� � +".` .tP.4 IF Val It IAA IVA ta.� e �"wa�'� �A -Jac � f. �y wV�,� r� 1 t`�• '�t Vv ♦$� -� y R`°s i"r' av'r-f.70 AT'T "`„ \'`i A. ACC. �_�V� � lio wd Ll 44 A!�,�� "RR�" .�":< � • , e'er � i�' I s Yahoo Mail• Search Organize Conquer B Brittney Harakal City Mayor Monday, Feb ruary 2, 2026114 PM Brittney Harakal FW: Laurel Facility Plan Follow Up Dave waggoner Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From:Samantha Mayes<brown.samantham@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,January 26, 2026 8:16 AM To:City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Re: Laurel Facility Plan Follow Up Good morning, I am writing again to follow up on my previous email.regardingthe proposed facility in Laurel. To date, I have not received a response, which is deeply concerning given the scale and impact of this project and the level of opposition and confusion within our community. I am concerned and bothered that I have yet to hear back from any part of the state government involved in this matter. As I outlined previously, after speakingwith Lee Deming, Vince Ricci, and our County Commissioners, it appears that no local representatives were consulted orgave approvalforthis plan.What role did you and Kurt Markeegard play in bringingthis to Laurel?You have been effusive, at best, when it comes to answering this question, and as your constituent, it is deeply troubling. There are also serious concerns about the proposed site itself.The location is in a residential area, adjacentto a school, youth softballfields, a golf course, and a public library. It is also within a mile of the CHS refinery. Given current land values, this raises Legitimate questions about whetherthe state may be overpaying for property that appears poorly suited for this purpose. In addition, I am requesting clarification regardingthe site's proximityto nearby oil refineries or related industrialfackities. Specifically, I would appreciate information on: • Whetherthe proximityto schools, an oil refinery, and public facilities was considered during site selection. • Why did you not loop Rep. Demingand Sen. Ricci into the decision-making process on this plan? Why not listen to our County Commissioners? • Doyou have an evacuation plan in place if somethingwere to happen atthe refinery? How willyou safely remove 32 criminally insane people from the faciLitywithout posing a danger to the community? Have you even spoken to CHS about this? t • Have you been in contact with our school board or superintendent about the placement so close to the school? If not,why?Wouldn't protecting our children be the primary question to be asked here? • Whether any environmental, air quality, or health impact assessments have been conducted in relation to this site. Have you studied water tables? Have you reviewed safety concerns related to the proximity of the refinery? Have you done traffic studies? • Have you done tax studies? Exactly how many dollars will this pull from our already struggling schools?What will happen to the real estate values in the area? • Have you done economic studies?What will this do to expansion in our city?We are limited geographically on where we, as a town, can expand- residentially or commercially. Have you researched whether this will impact future expansion? Most troubling is the apparent breakdown of the local governmental process. The majority of residents oppose this plan, and our city does not have the tax base to absorb the infrastructure demands this facilitywould create. Backdoor deals have been made without consulting the Laurel community. We deserve answers. I am again requesting clarification on your role in this decision, how Laurel was selected over other willing communities, and—most importantly—how the voices of residents and elected officials are intended to be heard. The continued lack of response only reinforces the perception that this process has excluded the community most directly affected. I respectfully request a response addressing these concerns. Thank you for your time and attention. Samantha Mayes On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 9:45 AM Samantha Mayes <brawn.samanthamOgmalt.com>wrote: Mayor Waggoner, I am writing to follow up on my previous correspondence regarding the proposed state facility in Laurel. I have not yet received a response, and given the magnitude of this proposal and the level of public concern, I feel it is important to seek clarity directly from you as our city's chief elected official. As I previously outlined, discussions with Lee Deming,Vince Ricci, and our County Commissioners indicate that this plan moved forward without consultation or approvaLfrom local representatives. City Council members have stated publicly that they were not briefed, that no formal discussion occurred, and that the infrastructure impacts on Laurel were not adequately studied. This is particularly troubling given that other communities—Hardin, Miles City, and Columbus—have offered land and services for this facility. I am also requesting clarification on your personal support forthis project. Publicly,the majority of Laurel residents and our elected representatives have expressed opposition (including Rep. Deming), 2 citing infrastructure limitations, tax base concerns, and the proposed site's proximity to a school, youth sports facilities, a golf course, and a public library. Given these concerns, I would like to understand what factors Led you to support this plan and how you believe it serves the best interests of Laurel. Do you support this plan?What was your role in this project? Has your office completed traffic studies? EnvironmentaL impact surveys? Neighborhood compatibility studies?What research was done to choose this spot,when in Laurel, right now, there are plenty of other plots of land available for sale that would be much more suitable? Additionally, I am concerned byyour activity on social media, specifically your"likes" on Facebook comments that are critical of residents and local officials who oppose this project.These actions give the impression that public concern is being dismissed ratherthan engaged with, and that opposition is being characterized negatively rather than treated as a legitimate part of civic discourse. I would appreciate clarification on how you view the role of public input in this process. At this point, there is a strong perception among residents that decisions are being made without transparency and without respect for the local governmental structure. As mayor, your role in ensuring open communication and accountability is critical. I respectfully request a response addressingyour support for this plan, the process bywhich Laurel was selected, and how residents'voices will be meaningfully considered movingforward. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, 3 Brittney Harakal From: Civil Attorney Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 4:50 PM To: Kurt Markegard; Kelly Strecker; Brittney Harakal; City Mayor Subject: FW: Public Records Request CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This transmission may contain information which is privileged,confidential,and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges. If you are not the addressee,or you are not authorized to disclose the contents herein, please note that any disclosure,copying,distribution,or use of the contents ofthis message is prohibited. If you have received this transmission In error,please destroy it and notify me immediately. From:Samantha Mayes<brown.samantham@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 4:19 PM To: Kelly Strecker<kstrecker@laurel.mt.gov>; Civil Attorney<civilattorney@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Good afternoon- Since the CAD is out sick I want to reiterate the importance of preserving communications. In addition, I wanted to clarify the request. All email, and texts between any of the combination Dave Waggoner,the BOI, Dan Villa, Charlie Bererton, and Kurt Markegard. From 5/1/25-present 1 Altsocial media posts, messages and texts between Dave Waggoner and Kurt markegard regarding the mentathe atth facility from 6/1/25-present I would also like to request phone call logs and text messages between Dave Waggoner and Kurt Markegard between 6/25/25 and 1/27125. If you could plea Please be advised that as of this request, deletion or editing of comments and messages would be spoliation of communication protected by MCA 2-2-1003. On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 11:02 AM Kelly Strecker<kStrecker(nl1aufet.mt.e0v>wrote: Good morning, I have passed your information along. Keu'q .strecleer QP C1er1z1 cisurer G.tld Of l-QureL, MOK&IRK t (406) 628-7431 extension 5100 From:Samantha Mayes<brown samantham@email.com> Sent:Thursday,January 29, 2026 6:39 AM To: Kelly Strecker<kstrecker@laurel.mt.eov> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Good Morning! I would like this to be added tothe public records request- anysocial media messages orcomments in connection with the facility proposal post by Dave Waggonerand Kurt Markegard or between Dave 2 Waggoner and Kurt Markegard. Please be advised that as of this request, deletion or editing of comments and messages would be spoliation of communication protected by MCA 2-2-1003. Thankyou, Samantha Please confirm receipt of this email. On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 12:07 PM Kelly Strecker<kstreckertataurel.mt.aov> wrote: Good afternoon, I will pass this information along. pppp FGEILIJ. StreclQer yW cleriz/Treasurer CLtd of L Qt rel, Mowtawa (406) 628-7431 extension 5100 From:Samantha Mayes<brown.samantharn@grnail.com> Sent:Wednesday,January 28, 202610:36 AM To: Kelly Strecker<kstrecker@laurel.mt.eov> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Good Morning! 3 I would like to amend that public records request. I would like to remove the requests for the emails, as I believe those have already been made public. I would also Like to request phone call logs and text messages between Dave Waggoner and Kurt Markegard between 6/25/25 and 1127/25. If you could please pass this on to the appropriate personnel I would appreciate it. On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 10:07 AM Kelly Strecker<k tr c reel mt=>wrote: Hello, I do not have access to get you the information you have requested. I have forwarded your request to the appropriate personnel. I hope you hear something soon. leel1.0 streaker CLerk/Freasurer CttU of LUUret, MOO W IAA (406( 628-7431 extension 5100 From:Samantha Mayes<brown.samantharri tzmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,January 27,2026 9:42 AM To: Kelly Strecker<kstreckerOlaurel.mt.eov> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Good Morning- not to bother you again but with the time crunch of the speed of all of this, do you have a time frame on when that record request will be reviewed?The state generally gives a response within 2 business days. On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:37 AM Kelly Strecker<kctreckefCrrllalfel mt eov>wrote: Good morning, 4 I have forwarded your message to the appropriate personal. Thanks �� Ke d stree!2er cLerle/Treasurer CLtd of L.AureL, Mowtclwa (406) 628-7431 extension 5100 From:Samantha Mayes<brown.samanthamraema!Lcom> Sent: Monday,January 26,2026 8:26 AM TO:City Clerk<citvclerk@laurel.mt.¢ov>;Civil Attorney<civilattomev laurelmt R0v> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Good Morning! I would like to confirm receipt of this public records request. Thankyou! Samantha Mayes On Fri,Jan 23, 2026 at 1:43 PM Samantha Mayes <brown samantham.dgmait.com>wrote: I am writing in accordance with MCA 2-2-1003 to request all copies of any emails and communications between Mayor Dave Waggoner, City Administrator Kurt Markegard, the city council, or Michelle Baukman regardingthe planning and proposal of the new mental health inpatient facility in Laurel. Including proposals, emails, discussions with the state, and memos. 5 Thankyou, Samantha Mayes Laurel Resident 6 Brittney Harakal 'IpI � City Mayor Sr'Yv Monday, February 2, 2026 1:13 PM Brittney Harakal FW: Laurel Facility Plan Follow Up nave waggower Mayor City of Laurel, Montana (406)628-8456 extension 5501 From: Samantha Mayes<brown.samantham@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,January 23, 2026 1:46 PM To: City Mayor<citymayor@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: Re: Laurel Facility Plan Follow Up Thank you for the statement. However, it failed to answer any of my questions. I am requesting clarification on your personal support for this project. publicly, the majority of Laurel residents and our elected representatives have expressed opposition (including Rep. Deming), citing infrastructure limitations,tax base concerns, and the proposed site's proximity to a school,youth sports facilities, a golf course, and a public Library. Given these concerns, I would like to understand what factors led you to support this plan and how you believe it serves the best interests of Laurel. Do you support this plan? What was your Involvement in this decision?What was your role in this project? Has your office completed traffic studies? Environmental impact surveys? Neighborhood compatibility studies?What research was done to choose this spot, when in Laurel, right now, there are plenty of other plots of land available for sale that would be much more suitable? Additionally, I am concerned byyour activity on social media, specifically your"likes" on Facebook comments that are critical of residents and local officials who oppose this project. These actions give the impression that public concern is being dismissed rather than engaged with, and that opposition is being characterized negatively rather than treated as a legitimate part of civic discourse. I would appreciate clarification on howyou viewthe role of public input in this process. At this point, there is a strong perception among residents that decisions are being made without transparency and without respect for the Local governmental structure. As mayor, your role in ensuring open communication and accountability is critical. I respectfully request a response addressingyour support forthis plan, the process by which Laurel was selected, and how residents'voices will be meaningfully considered movingforward. On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 9:48 AM City Mayor< >wrote: A statement is being prepared 1 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Get Outlook for And raid From: Samantha Mayes <brown.samantham@email.com> Sent: Friday,January 23, 2026 9:45:27 AM To:City Mayor<citvmavor(dlaurel.mt.eov> Subject: Laurel Facility Plan Follow Up Mayor Waggoner, I am writing to follow up on my previous correspondence regarding the proposed state facility in Laurel. I have not yet received a response, and given the magnitude of this proposal and the level of public concern, I feel it is important to seek clarity directly from you as our city's chief elected official. As I previously outlined, discussions with Lee Deming, Vince Ricci, and our County Commissioners indicate that this plan moved forward without consultation or approval from local representatives. City Council members have stated publicly that they were not briefed, that no formal discussion occurred, and that the infrastructure impacts on Laurel were not adequately studied. This is particularly troubling given that other communities—Hardin, Miles City, and Columbus—have offered land and services for this facility. I am also requesting clarification on your personal support for this project. Publicly,the majority of Laurel residents and our elected representatives have expressed opposition (including Rep. Deming), citing infrastructure limitations, tax base concerns, and the proposed site's proximity to a school, youth sports facilities, a golf course, and a public Library. Given these concerns, I would like to understand what factors led you to support this plan and how you believe it serves the best interests of Laurel. Do you support this plan?What was your role in this project? Has your office completed traffic studies? Environmental impact surveys? Neighborhood compatibility studies?What research was done to choose this spot,when in Laurel, right now, there are plenty of other plots of land available for sale that would be much more suitable? Additionally, I am concerned by your activity on social media, specificaLly your"likes" on Facebook comments that are critical of residents and local officials who oppose this project.These actions give the impression that public concern is being dismissed rather than engaged with, and that opposition is being characterized negatively rather than treated as a legitimate part of civic discourse. I would appreciate clarification on howyou view the role of public input in this process. At this point,there is a strong perception among residents that decisions are being made without transparency and without respect for the local governmental structure. As mayor,your role in ensuring open communication and accountability is critical. I respectfully request a response addressing your support for this plan,the process by which Laurel was selected, and how residents'voices will be meaningfully considered moving forward. Thank you foryourtime and attention. Sincerely, 2 Brittney Harakal From: Civil Attorney Sent: Wednesday,January 28, 2026 2:13 AM To: Brittney Harakal Subject: FW: City administrator smalls Best Regards, L/Aiukd L. 1�- Michele L. Braukmann Civil City Attorney City of Laurel Cell Phone: 406.671.4333 civilattornevca lau rel,mt.aov CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This transmission may contain information which is privileged, confidential,and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privileges. If you are not the addressee,or you are not authorized to disclose the contents herein, please note that any disclosure,copying,distribution,or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify me immediately. From: Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mt.gov> Sent: Tuesday,January 27, 2026 5:42 PM To:Civil Attorney<civilattorney@laurel.mt.gov> Subject: FW: City administrator emails I just received this(as did other council members). I can't quite follow what she means so I'm not sure how this would be disclosed. From:Samantha Mayes<brOWn.samantham@Qmall.Com> Sent:Tuesday,January 27, 2026 3:16 PM To:Ward 2B<ward2b@laurel.mt.g0v>; Ward 4A<ward4a@laurel.mtaov>; Ward 1A<ward1a@laurel mt gov>; Ward 1B <wardlb@Iaurel.mt.gov>;Ward 2A<ward2a6Dlaurelmt.eov>;Ward 3A<ward3a@Iaurel.mL¢ov>;Ward 3B <ward3b0aureLmt gov> Subject:City administrator emails On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 3:15 PM Samantha Mayes <brown samantham@p-ma1Lcom> wrote: Good afternoon- I thought you all might find this public record email helpful in understanding what happened with the Land proposal. Here you gave the city administrator, on behalf of land, offering up the woods land to the state. Despite claiming to the press that he had no idea why the state was Looking at Laurel during the December 4th meeting. 1 Tuesday, Chief Administrative Officer Kurt Markegard said the city learned of the decision only after the public announcement was made. "The state did not send me information on it. I had to go seek it once it went to the press," Markegard said during the meeting. z